Hindustan Copper Limited
NSE: HINDCOPPERCopper
Share price
₹467.50
-2.59% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
73
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹45,254 Cr
P/E ratio
37.5
P/B ratio
13.5
ROCE
42.4%
ROE
32.9%
Dividend yield
0.6%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 67.1% over the past year, and 2.6% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 27.8% to 49.3% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 2.6% a year against a sector median of 10.6% — 7.9 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 37.5× earnings it costs 1.6× the market, which pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 18.1×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 53.4×, the 18th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 0.7 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 50%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hindustan Copper Limited — this one | 50%/yr | 37.5× | ₹0.75 |
| Adani Enterprises | — | 141.1× | — |
| JSW Steel | 35%/yr | 23.9× | ₹0.68 |
| Hindustan Zinc | 10%/yr | 13.2× | ₹1.3 |
| Tata Steel | 10%/yr | 18.1× | ₹1.8 |
| Hindalco Industries | 19%/yr | 9.5× | ₹0.50 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies across the whole Metals & Mining sector, it ranks 4 of 61 on returns, 44 of 52 on growth, 2 of 61 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A wide advantage: it earns 42.4% on capital, ahead of 93% of companies across its whole sector. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹4085 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹2165 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹1080 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 8 years, about 258 arrived as cash — well above the profit, more than depreciation and interest account for, so do not count on it repeating. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being paid 19 days before it paid its own suppliers to paid 2 days before it paid its own suppliers.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
9 of 9 checks clear · 100%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue rose 81% year on year and profit rose 163%.
Announced 10 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹937 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+81.5%
Revenue vs last quarter
-19.0%
Net profit
₹352 Cr
Profit vs last year
+163.0%
Profit vs last quarter
-20.6%
Net margin
37.6%
EPS
₹3.64
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹45,254 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹467.50
- 52w High
- ₹760
- 52w Low
- ₹309
- Enterprise value
- ₹44,555 Cr
- Beta
- 1.7
- Price CAGR 1y
- 40.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 48.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 30.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 23.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 19.8%
- PEG ratio
- 0.7
- P/E ratio
- 37.5
- P/B ratio
- 13.5
- EV / EBITDA
- 25.3
- Industry P/E
- 19.4
- ROCE
- 42.4%
- ROCE 5y average
- 24.0%
- ROE
- 32.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.0
- Interest coverage
- 206.5
- Dividend yield
- 0.6%
- ROE 3y average
- 23.0%
- ROE last year
- 33.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹3,078 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹919 Cr
- Operating margin
- 48.0%
- Net profit margin
- 29.9%
- EBITDA margin
- 47.5%
- Sales growth 3y
- 22.4%
- Sales growth 5y
- 11.5%
- Profit growth 3y
- 50.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 55.0%
- EPS
- ₹9.5
- Sales growth TTM
- 67.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 148.0%
- Dividend payout
- 30.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹937 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹352 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 81.4%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 162.7%
- OPM latest quarter
- 54.2%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹34.5
- Face Value
- ₹5.0
- Total debt
- ₹111 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹810 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹111 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 5.9
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹1,474 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹1,019 Cr
- FCF yield
- 2.2%
- Net cash flow
- ₹741 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 66.1%
- FII holding
- 6.0%
- DII holding
- 4.8%
- Public holding
- 23.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hindustan Copper | 479.95 | 38.5 | 46,412 | 0.60 | 352.4 | 162.5 | 936.5 | 81.4 | 42.4 |
| Bhagyanagar Ind | 454.55 | 24.2 | 1,523 | 0.00 | 20.3 | 167.5 | 705.1 | 45.2 | 20.2 |
| Onix Solar | 355.10 | 21.8 | 1,309 | 0.00 | 20.8 | 1962.4 | 93.7 | 107.4 | 10.3 |
| Mardia Samyoung | 52.06 | 117.9 | 414 | 0.00 | 1.1 | 556.5 | 24.8 | 7.0 | |
| N D Metal Inds. | 75.00 | 77.5 | 19 | 0.00 | 0.2 | 200.0 | 0.1 | 4.5 | |
| Median | 404.83 | 31.3 | 1,416 | 0.00 | 20.5 | 362.0 | 399.4 | 81.4 | 15.3 |
Competes with: Bhagyanagar India Limited, Hindustan Zinc, Onix Solar Energy Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 371 | 381 | 399 | 565 | 494 | 518 | 328 | 731 | 516 | 718 | 687 | 1,156 | 937 |
| Expenses | 278 | 260 | 293 | 339 | 305 | 366 | 220 | 465 | 304 | 436 | 347 | 528 | 429 |
| Material Cost | 47 | 11 | 31 | 15 | 18 | 26 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 69 | -31 | -6.28 | -45 | 16 | -37 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 81 | 80 | 92 | 192 | 91 | 106 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 268 | 244 | 319 | 281 | 403 | 334 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 93 | 121 | 107 | 226 | 188 | 152 | 108 | 267 | 212 | 282 | 340 | 628 | 508 |
| OPM % | 25 | 32 | 27 | 40 | 38 | 29 | 33 | 36 | 41 | 39 | 50 | 54 | 54 |
| Other Income | 14 | 11 | 10 | 20 | 7 | 32 | 16 | 46 | 10 | 11 | -78 | 33 | 17 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Depreciation | 41 | 46 | 30 | 59 | 38 | 48 | 38 | 52 | 41 | 44 | 48 | 67 | 50 |
| Profit before tax | 62 | 83 | 82 | 184 | 154 | 135 | 84 | 259 | 179 | 249 | 213 | 592 | 472 |
| Tax % | 24 | 27 | 23 | 32 | 26 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 25 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 25 |
| Net Profit | 47 | 61 | 63 | 124 | 113 | 102 | 63 | 187 | 134 | 184 | 156 | 444 | 352 |
| EPS in Rs | 0.49 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.29 | 1.17 | 1.05 | 0.65 | 1.94 | 1.39 | 1.90 | 1.62 | 4.59 | 3.64 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 1.94 | 1.39 | 1.89 | 1.62 | 4.59 | 3.64 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,816 | 832 | 1,787 | 1,822 | 1,677 | 1,717 | 2,071 | 3,078 | 3,498 |
| Expenses | 1,310 | 1,074 | 1,375 | 1,310 | 1,185 | 1,170 | 1,333 | 1,615 | 1,740 |
| Material Cost | 114 | 75 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -92 | -66 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 313 | 359 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 998 | 1,247 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 506 | -242 | 411 | 512 | 492 | 547 | 738 | 1,463 | 1,758 |
| OPM % | 28 | -29 | 23 | 28 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 48 | 50 |
| Other Income | 37 | 57 | 35 | 50 | 96 | 55 | 77 | -24 | -17 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -96 | |||||||
| Interest | 60 | 62 | 64 | 30 | 17 | 17 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Depreciation | 253 | 291 | 295 | 150 | 175 | 175 | 176 | 200 | 209 |
| Profit before tax | 230 | -538 | 87 | 382 | 396 | 410 | 632 | 1,233 | 1,525 |
| Tax % | 37 | 6 | -26 | 2 | 25 | 28 | 26 | 25 | |
| Net Profit | 145 | -569 | 110 | 374 | 295 | 295 | 465 | 919 | 1,137 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.57 | -6.16 | 1.19 | 3.87 | 3.06 | 3.05 | 4.81 | 9.50 | 12 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 4.81 | 9.50 | |||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 33 | 0 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 11%
- 3 years
- 22%
- TTM
- 67%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 55%
- 3 years
- 50%
- TTM
- 148%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 23%
- 5 years
- 30%
- 3 years
- 48%
- 1 year
- 40%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 22%
- 3 years
- 23%
- Last year
- 33%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 463 | 463 | 463 | 484 | 484 | 484 | 484 | 484 |
| Reserves | 1,174 | 497 | 627 | 1,428 | 1,599 | 1,802 | 2,177 | 2,859 |
| Borrowings | 1,070 | 1,564 | 1,137 | 409 | 156 | 223 | 167 | 111 |
| Other Liabilities | 636 | 802 | 819 | 844 | 956 | 971 | 880 | 1,179 |
| Minority Interest | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | 3,343 | 3,326 | 3,046 | 3,164 | 3,194 | 3,479 | 3,708 | 4,632 |
| Fixed Assets | 317 | 337 | 322 | 282 | 1,326 | 1,430 | 1,731 | 1,922 |
| CWIP | 1,022 | 1,232 | 1,179 | 683 | 731 | 917 | 766 | 741 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 29 | 27 | 25 |
| Other Assets | 2,005 | 1,757 | 1,544 | 2,199 | 1,127 | 1,102 | 1,183 | 1,944 |
| Total Assets | 3,343 | 3,326 | 3,046 | 3,164 | 3,194 | 3,479 | 3,708 | 4,632 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 252 | 86 | 832 | 1,052 | 674 | 341 | 544 | 1,474 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -587 | -430 | -364 | -404 | -337 | -525 | -402 | -434 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 445 | 42 | 133 | -251 | -339 | -39 | -152 | -299 |
| Net Cash Flow | 110 | -302 | 601 | 397 | -3 | -222 | -10 | 741 |
| Free Cash Flow | -341 | -354 | 465 | 633 | 329 | -193 | 131 | 1,020 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 73 | 36 | 34 | 16 | 14 | 29 | 30 | 16 |
| Inventory Days | 1,176 | 409 | 602 | |||||
| Days Payable | 354 | 145 | 378 | |||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 894 | 36 | 298 | 239 | 14 | 29 | 30 | 16 |
| Working Capital Days | 69 | -96 | 18 | -19 | -29 | 35 | 56 | -2 |
| ROCE % | -18 | 6 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 24 | 42 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-699inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
2,66,71,750inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Hindustan Copper Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Uses as raw material
- copper-bearing secondary materials including e-scrap
Depends on the price of
- Gold
- copper
- silver
- sulphuric_acid
Sells to
- Adani Kutch Copper Limited · copper concentrate
- Hindalco Industries · copper concentrate
Buys from
- Bharat Wire Ropes Limited · Mining ropes for copper mines
- Eimco Elecon (India) Limited · Underground mining equipment for copper mines (seed NSE customer, default-kept)
- South West Pinnacle Exploration Limited · Mineral exploration and underground core drilling; named marquee client in Q1 FY27 call
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Metals & Mining
- Industry
- Copper
- Classification
- Metals & Mining › Copper
- ISIN
- INE531E01026
Plants
- Gujarat Copper Project · Jhagadia / Bharuch, Gujarat
- Indian Copper Complex · Ghatsila / East Singhbhum, Jharkhand
- Khetri Copper Complex · Khetrinagar / Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan
- Malanjkhand Copper Project · Malanjkhand / Balaghat, Madhya Pradesh
- Taloja Copper Project · Taloja / Raigad, Maharashtra
News impact
Big market events that reach Hindustan Copper Limited, and how the effect spreads.
11 Sept, 04:38 IST · Market event · medium impact
Copper slips as White House tariff plan stalls but record rally exposes mining-smelting mismatch
Copper dipped as US tariff talk cooled, mildly hurting miners like Hindustan Copper while easing costs for wire and cable makers.
Who it hits first
- Copper miners (Hindustan Copper, Hindalco) face softer realisations
- Wire and cable makers (KEI, Polycab, Finolex, Ram Ratna) get input relief
- Smelters' treatment charges stay squeezed on concentrate shortage
Who may gain
- Cable makers expand margins as copper cost eases
- Electrical-equipment buyers gain on lower input pass-through later
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Cable and winding-wire prices ease with a lag, aiding capital-goods margins.
Upstream
Miners cut spot offers; scrap flows rise as fabricators destock.
Where demand moves
Business
Cheaper copper lowers wire-rod cost for cable plants within weeks; miners defer spot sales hoping for rebound; smelter margins stay thin.
Capital
Money rotates from miners into cable makers on the margin swing.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
cable and equipment makers gain 60-110 bps margin relief
Metals & Mining
producer realisations soften from record levels
Commodity angle
Commodity
copper
Note
Ranker move (-0.45%) sat inside the +/-2% deadband so edge roles were kept as-is; copper's fresh 1M move is -1.18% (a fall), so consumer relief signs below are inverted to positive per the unresolved-move rule.
Shock type
price
When it plays out
Immediate
Miner stocks soften; cable makers firm on margin math.
Medium term
Mining-smelting mismatch keeps structural deficit — dips likely bought.
Short term
Watch White House tariff decision and LME stocks for direction.
26 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · high impact
UPDATE: The Hindustan Copper offer for sale is subscribed 3.41 times and the government exercises the green-shoe, then signals Hindustan Zinc is next in a Rs 80,000 crore FY27 disinvestment push
The government's sale of Hindustan Copper shares was heavily oversubscribed so it is selling even more, and has signalled Hindustan Zinc is next - which means more shares hitting the market and short-term pressure on both stocks.
Who it hits first
- Hindustan Copper faces up to 6% of its equity being sold at a 10.4% discount, holding the price near the Rs 514 floor
- Hindustan Zinc faces the same overhang one step earlier, with a sale signalled but no price fixed
Who may gain
- Institutional buyers get a 10.4% discount on a company earning 42.5% on capital employed
- The exchequer, which is Rs 52,000 crore into an Rs 80,000 crore FY27 disinvestment target
- Private metals producers see no direct benefit - this is an ownership change, not a change in copper or zinc supply
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Unchanged. Copper rod and zinc galvanising customers face no supply disruption; the physical business is untouched by the ownership change. Any share price move here is a market-plumbing effect, not a signal about metal availability.
Upstream
Unchanged. Mining contractors, explosives suppliers and equipment vendors to Hindustan Copper and Hindustan Zinc see no change in order flow from a share sale - the mines keep running to the same plan.
Where demand moves
Business
No business demand changes at all. Neither company mines a kilogram less copper or zinc because the government sold shares - customers, contracts and capacity are untouched. This is purely a change in who owns the shares, which is why the effect fades once the sale clears.
Capital
Money rotates within the metals pocket rather than out of it. Institutional investors sell existing metals holdings to fund the discounted offer for sale, which is why Hindustan Zinc fell on the day Hindustan Copper's floor was announced. Once the sale settles, the freed-up money usually returns to the same names, which is why the one-month record is far less negative than the one-day record.
How it spreads across sectors
Metals & Mining
Short-term pressure across state-owned metals names as investors sell to fund the discounted offer, then a rebound once the sale clears
When it plays out
Immediate
Over the next few days Hindustan Copper trades near the Rs 514 floor while the sale settles, and Hindustan Zinc drifts under the expectation of its own sale.
Medium term
Over one to six months, what actually determines both stocks is the copper and zinc price cycle, not the share sale. Copper is up 4.51% over the past month, which is the more important variable. A larger free float also makes both stocks more liquid and index-eligible, which helps over time.
Short term
Over the next one to four weeks the overhang clears for Hindustan Copper. Watch for the Hindustan Zinc floor price to be announced, which will trigger the same one-day drop pattern.
25 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · high impact
Government offers up to 6% of Hindustan Copper through an offer for sale at a floor price of Rs 514, a 10.4% discount to Monday's close, with a 3% base offer and a 3% green-shoe option
The government is selling up to 6% of state-owned Hindustan Copper at a price about 10% below Monday's market price, so a large block of new shares hits the market cheaply - which usually drags the share price down toward that discounted level for a few days.
Who it hits first
- Hindustan Copper shareholders face an immediate supply overhang as up to 6% of the company is offered at a 10.4% discount
- The government raises cash toward its FY27 disinvestment target and signals more offers to come in Hindustan Zinc, Mazagon Dock and IRCTC
Who may gain
- Institutional and retail buyers who get Hindustan Copper roughly 10% cheaper than the screen price
- Free-float and index weighting improve as government holding falls, which over time supports higher institutional ownership
- Peer copper names that attract investors who want the metal exposure without the block overhang
Along the supply chain
Downstream
No downstream effect - copper cathode and concentrate customers are unaffected by the ownership change. The event is purely a change in who holds the equity.
Upstream
No supply-chain effect - a change in share ownership does not alter what Hindustan Copper buys from its ore and power suppliers.
Where demand moves
Business
There is no business demand change at all here - Hindustan Copper's mines, smelters and customers are unaffected by who owns its shares. The only flow is in the shares themselves: a fixed quantity of stock moves from the government to the market at a set discount.
Capital
Capital is pulled toward Hindustan Copper at the discounted price and away from it at the market price, which is why the stock typically falls toward the floor. Some of the money that would have chased Hindustan Copper in the open market rotates instead into peer copper and base-metal names, and a second wave of demand appears once the block clears and the overhang is gone - which is why the 2021 offer was followed by a 27.5% gain over the next month.
How it spreads across sectors
Metals & Mining
Near-term supply overhang in the one listed pure-play copper miner; a signal that more public-sector offers for sale are coming in FY27
Commodity angle
Commodity
copper
Note
Included for grounding because the analysis cites the copper price. This is an equity-supply event, not a copper price event: neither HINDCOPPER nor HINDALCO carries a DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge to copper in the graph, so impacted_companies is empty and no margin impact in basis points is claimed. Prices are read from the live lowercase 'copper' series ($6.6035/lb, +3.99% over one month); the cased 'Copper' twin node reads flat at 0.00% and was not used.
Shock type
price
When it plays out
Immediate
The stock gravitates toward the Rs 514 floor while the non-retail and retail tranches are absorbed over two sessions.
Medium term
Once the block clears, the improved free float and higher institutional ownership can work in the stock's favour; after the September 2021 offer the stock was 27.5% higher a month later.
Short term
Subscription levels decide the tone - a fully covered book with the green-shoe exercised clears the overhang quickly, tepid non-retail demand extends the pressure, which is what happened in September 2021.
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
India notifies the MMDR Amendment Act 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling unpaid pre-Act state levies - Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh threaten to move the Supreme Court
A new mining law stops state governments charging miners extra taxes on the land their mines sit on and wipes out the unpaid old bills, which saves money for miners like Coal India, NMDC, Tata Steel and SAIL - but the states say they will fight it in the Supreme Court.
Who it hits first
- Companies that own their own mines in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh no longer face open-ended state cess bills. Tata Steel, SAIL, NMDC, Coal India and Hindustan Copper had been staring at instalment payments that were due to start from April 2026, and the unpaid part of those bills is now wiped out.
- Manganese and copper miners with pits in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan get the same certainty, but a smaller one, because those states never levied the aggressive cesses that the eastern states did.
Who may gain
- NMDC and Coal India, which sell ore and coal at administered prices and could not pass a state cess on to buyers, keep the money instead.
- Integrated steel makers that dig their own iron ore and coal - Tata Steel, SAIL, Jindal Steel - see the cost of self-mined ore stop drifting upward.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, aluminium smelters and thermal power stations that buy domestic ore and coal are the end users. Their input bills stop being exposed to a state deciding to add a new cess mid-contract, which makes long-term supply pricing easier to fix.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and mine-developer-operators get more predictable client budgets, because their customers no longer have to set aside cash for disputed state levies. Adani Enterprises, which runs mines for state generators, is the clearest example.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing changes in how much ore or coal India buys. What changes is who keeps the cash: money that would have flowed from miners to state treasuries stays with the miners. Steel mills that buy ore in the open market may eventually see slightly cheaper ore because sellers no longer have to build a state cess into their price.
Capital
If the relief is believed, money rotates into the companies with the biggest cancelled bills - Tata Steel, SAIL, Coal India, NMDC. So far it has not: the group is flat to down over the eight sessions since the Bill passed, which says investors are waiting to see whether the states win in court before paying for it.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and contract-mining order books become easier to plan once miners are not holding cash back for disputed tax bills.
Metals & Mining
Contingent liabilities set aside for state mineral cesses can be written back, and the cash cost of self-mined ore stops rising.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India, which faced some of the largest state demands on coal-bearing land, keeps cash it had provided for.
Power
Thermal generators buying domestic coal get more predictable fuel costs, since coal suppliers no longer need to price in a possible state cess.
When it plays out
Immediate
Little share-price reaction is likely, because the Act was already notified on 17 August and the market has had eight sessions to react and did not. Watch for companies quantifying the write-back in their September-quarter results.
Medium term
If the Act survives, mining project economics improve permanently and captive-mine expansion becomes easier to underwrite. If it is struck down, the twelve-year instalment clock from the 2024 ruling restarts.
Short term
State governments file in the Supreme Court. Any interim order that stays the Act would hand the relief straight back and hit the same shares.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower legal/tax uncertainty for limestone and other mineral-bearing land reduces contingent cost risk for cement producers with captive mines; if states cannot add mineral levies, royalty-linked input inflation risk eases for clinker/cement capacity in mineral-rich states.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for cement companies with captive limestone exposure or large eastern/central India operations.","sector":"Construction Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cost certainty for iron ore, coal and aggregates can reduce pass-through risk in steel, cement and power inputs; lower perceived project-cost inflation supports EPC margins and road/rail/industrial capex execution.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","PNCINFRA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order effect depends on whether miners and metal producers pass cost relief through to customers.","sector":"Infrastructure \u0026 Construction","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If steel and cement cost pressures ease, construction input-cost volatility declines for developers; lower commodity-linked working-capital stress can support project margins and launch economics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect and likely smaller than demand, interest-rate and local approval drivers.","sector":"Realty","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced tax overhang for domestic iron ore, manganese and steel producers improves steel cost visibility; auto OEMs and component makers benefit if flat/long steel price risk moderates.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More visible for steel-intensive vehicles, forgings and components; pass-through contracts may dilute near-term benefit.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty in steel, copper and aluminium supply chains can stabilize input costs for appliances, cables and electrical goods; improved metal availability reduces procurement risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and depends on commodity price transmission rather than the legal change itself.","sector":"Consumer Durables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cancellation of unpaid pre-Act levies lowers contingent liabilities and credit-risk tail events for leveraged miners, steel producers and power-linked borrowers; banks/NBFCs with commodity-sector exposure may see reduced provisioning risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large diversified lenders see diluted impact; project financiers with metals, mining and power exposure are more relevant.","sector":"Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral extraction and dispatch plans become less constrained by tax uncertainty, rail, port and bulk logistics volumes for coal, iron ore, steel and allied minerals may improve; eastern corridor movement benefits most.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume effect requires actual production/dispatch response, not just accounting relief.","sector":"Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mining-cost certainty for coal, limestone, rock phosphate and mineral inputs can marginally improve domestic raw-material availability and energy-cost visibility for fertilizer and industrial chemical producers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","GNFC","CHAMBLFERT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive input-cost effect may be offset by administered pricing, subsidy timing and global commodity trends.","sector":"Chemicals \u0026 Fertilizers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states lose potential retrospective levy collections, which can pressure state capex, receivables discipline or subsidy payments; utilities and contractors exposed to Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh state entities could see mixed fiscal knock-ons.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","IRB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Not a pure NSE sector classification, but relevant as a cross-sector fiscal transmission channel.","sector":"State-Focused Public Finance / Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
Parliament passes the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling uncollected past mineral levies
Parliament has stopped state governments from charging their own taxes on mining, and cancelled old state demands that were never actually collected - a large windfall for miners and steel makers like Tata Steel, Coal India and NMDC, and a revenue loss for mineral-rich states such as Jharkhand and Odisha.
Who it hits first
- Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026, which stops state governments charging their own taxes and cesses on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, and cancels past state demands that were never actually deposited or recovered. This directly reverses the effect of the Supreme Court's July and August 2024 rulings, which had let states tax minerals and recover those taxes going back to April 2005. Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, limestone and copper - and integrated steel makers with their own captive mines - lose a large, open-ended liability from their accounts.
Who may gain
- Integrated steel makers with captive mines, above all Tata Steel, which had disclosed one of the largest provisions against retrospective state mineral demands.
- Iron-ore, coal and manganese miners - NMDC, Coal India, MOIL and Hindustan Copper - whose per-tonne cost becomes predictable again.
- Cement makers with captive limestone quarries, whose cess exposure is now capped by the Centre rather than open to state discretion.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and power stations that buy these minerals get a more predictable delivered cost, because the risk of a state suddenly adding a cess to their input price is now removed. That improves the reliability of their own margin guidance rather than lowering their costs today.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and equipment suppliers gain, because miners freed of a large contingent liability can restart or accelerate expansion projects. Solar Industries and mine-development contractors sit in this queue, though orders typically follow two to three quarters behind the cash release.
Where demand moves
Business
No physical supply is disrupted, so tonnage does not change hands. What changes is money: a contingent tax claim worth tens of thousands of crores across the industry is cancelled, so cash that miners had set aside stays with them. That cash tends to go into paying down debt and into expansion capital spending, which over the next few quarters means more orders for mining equipment, explosives, and mine-development contractors. In the opposite direction, mineral-rich state governments - Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh - lose an expected revenue stream, which can slow their own infrastructure spending and hurt companies dependent on those state budgets.
Capital
Money should rotate into the metals and mining sector generally, and within it towards the companies that had actually provided for the retrospective demand - those get a direct, quantifiable write-back - rather than towards recyclers and traders that never had the liability. Some money may rotate out of state-government-dependent contractors and state-focused lenders in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and explosives makers benefit as freed-up cash funds expansion.
Construction Materials
Cement makers with captive limestone lose an open-ended state cess risk.
Financial Services
Lenders concentrated in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh face a modest negative as those state budgets lose an expected revenue line.
Metals & Mining
A large contingent liability is removed and future mining costs become predictable.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India's state cess exposure is capped, the single largest such exposure in the country.
Power
Thermal generators get more predictable delivered coal costs.
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect mining and metals stocks to open higher, with the biggest moves in the names that had actually disclosed provisions - Tata Steel, Coal India, NMDC. Note the historical precedent runs the other way and is noisy: on the two adverse Supreme Court dates in 2024 these same stocks closed higher the following day, because the bad news had already been absorbed on the ruling day itself.
Medium term
Over one to six months the durable effect is lower and more predictable mining costs, which supports Indian steel and cement margins. The offsetting risk is that mineral-rich states cut their own capital spending, which would hurt regional contractors and state-focused lenders.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch for companies to quantify the write-back in exchange filings - that is what turns a headline into an earnings number. Jharkhand and Odisha are likely to challenge the law or seek compensation, and any credible legal challenge would take some of the gain back.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Removal of contingent mineral-tax liabilities improves cash-flow visibility and credit metrics for mining, steel, cement and power borrowers; lower probability of stressed working-capital drawdowns or covenant breaches benefits lenders and financiers exposed to these sectors.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is indirect and strongest for lenders with commodity, infrastructure, PSU and project-finance exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower tax uncertainty for coal, iron ore, limestone and metal producers can support mine dispatches, steel/cement production planning and bulk commodity movement; higher freight volumes benefit rail-linked logistics and port handlers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on whether producers convert liability relief into higher output rather than balance-sheet repair.","sector":"Railways \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved capex confidence in steel, metals and mining can lift demand for oxygen, nitrogen, argon, acetylene, electrodes and welding consumables used in smelting, fabrication and maintenance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LINDEINDIA","INOXINDIA","ADORWELD"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order capex and utilization play; not an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Industrial Gases \u0026 Welding Consumables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel, cement and non-ferrous producers facing lower mineral-levy risk may run plants at steadier utilization and restart deferred maintenance/capacity programs, increasing demand for refractory bricks, monolithics and kiln/ladle linings.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["RHIM","IFGLEXPOR","VESUVIUS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant if steel and cement producers expand output after cost visibility improves.","sector":"Refractories \u0026 Industrial Ceramics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral-rich states lose expected retrospective levy revenues, their fiscal room for state-funded roads, irrigation and local infrastructure may tighten; however lower steel/cement cost risk can support project economics for contractors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IRB","PNCINFRA","ASHOKA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative state-capex channel versus positive input-cost visibility channel.","sector":"Roads \u0026 Infrastructure Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cement and steel cost uncertainty eases as limestone, iron ore and coal levy risks are capped; this can improve margin visibility for developers and building-material users if input prices stabilize.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","OBEROIRLTY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pass-through and demand conditions matter more than the tax change, so the link is defensible but diluted.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty around steel, aluminium and copper supply costs can reduce input-cost volatility for vehicle makers and component suppliers, especially if metal producers pass through some benefit via prices or stable contracts.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Third-order effect; stronger for metal-intensive CV, tractor, forging and component chains.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states facing weaker revenue expectations may slow payments, local schemes or contractor spending, potentially softening rural liquidity and credit demand in affected regions such as Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CREDITACC","SPANDANA","UJJIVANSFB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regional and fiscal-transmission risk; not a direct balance-sheet hit from the Bill.","sector":"State-Focused NBFCs \u0026 Microfinance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"With retrospective levy overhang reduced, miners may have greater certainty to maintain or expand extraction plans, supporting demand for industrial explosives, blasting services, mine development and contract mining.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SOLARINDS","GOCLCORP","GMDCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most sensitive to actual mine production growth and tender activity after policy clarity.","sector":"Explosives \u0026 Mining Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 16 Sep 2026 | unspecified | ₹1.86 |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb 2026 | interim | ₹1 |
| 18 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹1.46 |
| 19 Sep 2024 | unspecified | ₹0.92 |
| 22 Sep 2023 | unspecified | ₹0.92 |
| 20 Sep 2022 | unspecified | ₹1.16 |
| 14 Sep 2021 | unspecified | ₹0.35 |
| 23 Jul 2019 | unspecified | ₹0.52 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Insider trades
| Disclosed | Who | Type | Shares | Value ₹ Cr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026 | The President of India acting through and represented by Ministry of Mines, Government of India · Promoter | SELL | 5,80,37,605 | 3,044.88 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2627 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2024-2529 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.