Fin Cascade

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

Silver Touch Technologies Limited

NSE: SILVERTUCComputers - Software & Consulting

Share price

₹131.18

+4.13% close of 9 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹1,640 CrP/E 40.0

Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

70

out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹1,640 Cr

P/E ratio

40.0

P/B ratio

9.8

ROCE

29.8%

ROE

24.4%

Dividend yield

0.1%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹209.9952-week low ₹69.53

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Our sales figures for this company step down at Jun 2021 and we hold nothing that says why, so we cannot honestly quote a growth rate across it.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

Our sales figures for this company step down at Jun 2021 and we hold nothing that says why, so there is no honest growth rate of its own to set against its sector.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

At 40.0× earnings it costs 1.7× the market, which pays 24.1× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 25.2×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 49.1×, the 25th percentile of its own range.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

Priced at 0.7 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 56%.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
Silver Touch Technologies Limited — this one56%/yr40.0×₹0.71
Wipro5%/yr12.9×₹2.6
Tech Mahindra1%/yr25.2×₹25.2
LTIMindtree Limited7%/yr21.8×₹3.1
Persistent Systems28%/yr45.8×₹1.6
Coforge33%/yr43.2×₹1.3

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Computers - Software & Consulting), it ranks 12 of 53 on returns, 13 of 49 on growth, 30 of 52 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

A wide advantage: it earns 29.8% on capital, ahead of 77% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

No — Over the last five years it made ₹41 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹64 crore on plant and equipment, ₹23 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹0 crore to ₹33 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 57 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 109 days for its cash to waiting 87 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

8 of 9 checks clear · 89%

Latest result · Q1 FY26

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Announced 12 Sep 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited

Revenue

₹63 Cr

Revenue vs last year

+10.5%

Revenue vs last quarter

-26.8%

Net profit

₹4 Cr

Profit vs last year

+34.5%

Profit vs last quarter

-55.2%

Net margin

6.4%

EPS

₹3.18

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹1,640 Cr
Prev close
₹131.18
52w High
₹217
52w Low
₹67.6
Enterprise value
₹1,660 Cr
Beta
0.6
Price CAGR 1y
82.0%
Price CAGR 3y
31.0%
Price CAGR 5y
52.0%
Price CAGR 10y
—

Ratios

Return on assets
12.2%
PEG ratio
0.7
P/E ratio
40.0
P/B ratio
9.8
EV / EBITDA
23.1
Industry P/E
18.2
ROCE
29.8%
ROCE 5y average
19.8%
ROE
24.4%
Debt / Equity
0.2
Interest coverage
7.9
Dividend yield
0.1%
ROE 3y average
20.0%
ROE last year
24.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹342 Cr
Annual profit
₹36 Cr
Operating margin
18.0%
Net profit margin
10.5%
EBITDA margin
18.1%
Sales growth 3y
27.8%
Sales growth 5y
17.6%
Profit growth 3y
56.0%
Profit growth 5y
106.0%
EPS
₹2.8
Sales growth TTM
21.0%
Profit growth TTM
82.0%
Dividend payout
4.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹78 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹10 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
23.4%
YoY quarterly profit growth
150.0%
OPM latest quarter
21.9%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹13.5
Face Value
₹2.0
Total debt
₹33 Cr
Total cash
₹12 Cr
Borrowings
₹33 Cr
Reserves / Equity
5.8

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
₹17 Cr
Free cash flow
₹13 Cr
FCF yield
0.4%
Net cash flow
-₹6 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
74.7%
FII holding
0.5%
DII holding
0.0%
Public holding
24.9%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
TCS2,105.1014.27,61,6443.0413,420.08.472,275.013.963.0
Infosys999.8013.14,05,7474.797,775.012.348,211.014.040.0
HCL Technologies1,189.5017.83,22,7914.584,626.020.334,579.013.930.4
Wipro160.2512.01,58,7336.893,356.30.724,478.610.617.8
Tech Mahindra1,498.0027.61,46,8283.441,486.328.415,711.917.723.1
LTM3,970.0021.01,17,7591.861,468.616.911,608.018.029.6
Persistent Systems5,500.0043.686,7630.73483.013.74,303.229.134.4
Silver Touch128.3539.11,6280.0710.0147.378.023.429.8
Median212.7518.98470.3310.113.085.717.622.1

Competes with: HCL Technologies, Infosys, LTIMindtree Limited, Persistent Systems, Tata Consultancy Services, Tech Mahindra, Wipro

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales435253795775748663869610178
Expenses40464668506665705472777961
Material Cost00000
Change in Inventories0.87-0.18-0.20-0.080.06
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade111311122.80
Employee Cost3441434643
Other Expenses7.8418242215
Operating Profit46711791015914192217
OPM %8.18121414121213181416202122
Other Income0000000000000
Exceptional items (within Other Income)00000
Interest0000011112212
Depreciation1111222222222
Profit before tax256956712610151813
Tax %23211832263021263022252624
Net Profit1456345947111310
EPS in Rs0.120.280.370.500.260.350.410.730.320.590.871.040.79
Diluted EPS in Rs3.185.898.691.041.58

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales117140123172211190152140164224288342360
Expenses104128111156191177148128147199251280289
Material Cost0
Change in Inventories0.41
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade47
Employee Cost164
Other Expenses71
Operating Profit1312121720134121725386272
OPM %1191010972.7081011131820
Other Income1111111123320
Exceptional items (within Other Income)0
Interest333122211147.027
Depreciation75434423557.058.569
Profit before tax45614158191322304855
Tax %36333239283282727252625
Net Profit3348115161016223642
EPS in Rs0.470.550.720.660.830.410.080.510.761.261.752.823.29
Diluted EPS in Rs2.82
Dividend Payout %23157861264107434

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
9%
5 years
18%
3 years
28%
TTM
21%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
28%
5 years
106%
3 years
56%
TTM
82%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
—
5 years
52%
3 years
31%
1 year
82%

Return on equity

10 years
14%
5 years
16%
3 years
20%
Last year
24%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital666131313131313131325
Reserves303336536368697382100121144
Borrowings22231738101011114333
Other Liabilities274517494941423742496694
Minority Interest0.05
Total Liabilities8510776117133132124123148173243296
Fixed Assets151617161919192231295468
CWIP0000000071570
Investments000000011111
Other Assets70905910111311210499109128181227
Total Assets8510776117133132124123148173243296

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity-15138-70128163-317
Cash from Investing Activity-2-5-3-3-5-3-2-7-19-12-19-3
Cash from Financing Activity4-2-9282-6-87327-20
Net Cash Flow2-218-4-04-74-66-6
Free Cash Flow-3096-12-291-5-10-2213

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days115159102137101115114117123119109122
Inventory Days3028121346612128107
Days Payable711564112582105154308438232132188
Cash Conversion Cycle743173242316-34-179-304-105-13-59
Working Capital Days958951626986113109961087387
ROCE %131524221131116202230

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters757574747474757575757575
FIIs000.0300000.050.100.751.140.48
DIIs0000000000.0400
Public252526262626252525252425
No. of Shareholders1,2331,2621,3971,4491,4411,5371,5701,5822,0113,5219,87310,774

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year +76.7% (₹74.25 → ₹131.18)Brick size ₹9.09 (fixed)Bricks 35
₹100₹150₹200₹131Jan '26Mar '26May '26Jul '26Sep '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹131.18 on 9 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

20.28inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-09-30

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-09-30

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-09-30

News

News and filings about Silver Touch Technologies Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Information Technology
Industry
Computers - Software & Consulting
Classification
Information Technology › Computers - Software & Consulting
ISIN
INE625X01026

Business segments

  • Within India · 87%
  • Outside India · 13%

News impact

Big market events that reach Silver Touch Technologies Limited, and how the effect spreads.

Who it hits first

  • Indian IT-services & AI firms get a favorable policy environment for US-India tech collaboration
  • AI-infrastructure/server (NETWEB), chip-design (MOSCHIP) and design-engineering (TATAELXSI) firms positioned for cross-border AI co-development
  • Soft MEA statement (not a binding deal/contract) -> modest, medium-term, sentiment-led impact

Who may gain

  • AI-compute hardware (NETWEB)
  • Semiconductor/chip-design (MOSCHIP)
  • Engineering R&D/design (TATAELXSI)
  • Govt/e-governance tech (SILVERTUC)
  • Payments/fintech tech (NPST)

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Enterprises and government departments adopting AI become downstream consumers of Indian IT-services and SaaS (TATAELXSI, AMAGI, NPST, SILVERTUC).

Upstream

AI-server/electronics assemblers (NETWEB, TVSELECT) pull demand for imported GPUs/semiconductors and components; deeper India-US ties may ease access to advanced US chips and design tools.

Where demand moves

Business

Favorable India-US AI policy could route US enterprise/government AI workloads, co-development and procurement toward Indian IT-services and AI-infrastructure vendors; domestic AI-server (NETWEB) and chip-design (MOSCHIP) firms gain order-pipeline optionality as localisation is encouraged.

Capital

Thematic India-US AI rotation favours mid/small-cap IT and electronics names; institutional flows likely concentrate first in liquid large-cap IT and proven AI-infra plays before speculative small-caps.

How it spreads across sectors

Defence

dual-use AI/defence-electronics cooperation

Electronics

hardware/electronics localisation (note: no Electronics Company nodes in Neo4j)

IT Services

positive policy tailwind for US deals

Information Technology

AI demand pull

codex additions

  • Data Centres & Digital Infrastructure
  • Telecom & 5G Network Infrastructure
  • Power Utilities & Grid Equipment
  • Capital Goods & Electrical Equipment
  • Cybersecurity & Digital Trust
  • Cloud/SaaS & Digital Platforms
  • Education, Skilling & HR Services
  • Legal, Compliance & Data Governance Services
  • Media, Internet & Ad-Tech

When it plays out

Immediate

Soft MEA statement, not a binding deal -> minimal immediate price reaction; at most a thematic pop in AI-narrative small-caps.

Medium term

Structural tailwind if cooperation translates to US AI workloads, chip access and co-development; benefits accrue to fundamentally strong, reasonably valued names rather than richly-valued narrative plays.

Short term

Watch for concrete iCET/TRUST follow-through (MoUs, AI/chip procurement, US chip-access easing).

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"India-US AI cooperation -\u003e higher enterprise/cloud AI workloads -\u003e need for domestic data-centre capacity, power-dense hosting, cooling and managed infrastructure","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","ESCONET","STLTECH"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Second-order beneficiary from AI compute localisation, distinct from server hardware. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Data Centres \u0026 Digital Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI tie-up -\u003e more cloud/edge AI use cases -\u003e higher data traffic and enterprise private-network demand -\u003e capex in fiber, 5G, edge connectivity","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","INDUSTOWER","TEJASNET"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on actual enterprise AI deployment. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Telecom \u0026 5G Network Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI compute and data-centre expansion -\u003e rising electricity demand and reliability needs -\u003e demand for power supply, grid gear, transformers, backup","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","TRIL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"AI infrastructure is power-intensive; gradual but structurally supportive. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Power Utilities \u0026 Grid Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Strategic-tech cooperation -\u003e more investment in electronics, data centres and semiconductor-adjacent facilities -\u003e demand for automation, switchgear, power systems","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SIEMENS","ABB","CGPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Broader capex enabler, not a direct AI beneficiary. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Capital Goods \u0026 Electrical Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Cross-border AI collaboration -\u003e greater data-sharing, model-security and compliance needs -\u003e demand for cybersecurity, identity, cloud-security, managed security","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUICKHEAL","SAKSOFT","CYIENT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Listed pure-play cybersecurity choices limited in India. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cybersecurity \u0026 Digital Trust","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Favorable India-US AI policy -\u003e easier enterprise AI partnerships and productisation -\u003e SaaS firms embed AI, improve pricing power, address US clients","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NEWGEN","RATEGAIN","INTELLECT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit from product/platform AI monetisation. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cloud/SaaS \u0026 Digital Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI collaboration narrative -\u003e demand for AI talent, reskilling, certifications, hiring support -\u003e training and staffing firms see higher enterprise spend","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","TEAMLEASE","QUESS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Lagged, dependent on corporate training budgets. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Education, Skilling \u0026 HR Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"India-US AI cooperation -\u003e more cross-border data, IP, model-risk and regulatory work -\u003e demand for compliance tech, governance workflows, regtech","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CAMS","KFINTECH","INTELLECT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Mostly indirect; exposure via compliance-heavy fintech platforms. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Legal, Compliance \u0026 Data Governance Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI tools and US partnerships -\u003e faster content generation, personalisation, ad targeting -\u003e productivity upside but disruption to legacy content models","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NAZARA","ZEEL","AFFLE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"AI lowers costs for digital firms while pressuring traditional content economics. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Media, Internet \u0026 Ad-Tech","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Who it hits first

  • Truist cut its price target on Accenture (ACN; US-listed, not in the Indian knowledge graph) after Q3, signaling softer global IT-services discretionary demand. As the sector bellwether, ACN's caution reads through to the largest Indian IT exporters (TCS, INFY, WIPRO, HCLTECH) and richly-valued mid/small-cap IT names — a sentiment overhang, not a hard order-book shock.

Who may gain

  • No material domestic beneficiary — a demand-softness read-through has no clear winner. Within IT, relative preference rotates toward cheaper, stronger-balance-sheet large caps (TCS PE 14.5, INFY PE 14) over richly-valued mid/small caps; domestic-revenue (NPST) and AI-hardware (NETWEB) names are insulated rather than beneficiaries.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream are global enterprise buyers (BFSI, retail, communications). Accenture's caution implies these clients may defer discretionary transformation projects, trimming the incremental deal flow Indian vendors win — the core read-through channel.

Upstream

Indian IT's upstream is talent and subcontractor capacity. A softer demand outlook marginally eases wage and subcontractor cost pressure but also signals slower hiring — no acute upstream supply disruption from this event.

Where demand moves

Business

Softer global IT-services discretionary spend trims incremental deal-flow and pricing for export-led Indian IT (TCS, INFY, WIPRO, HCLTECH and mid-caps like TATAELXSI, SILVERTUC). Domestic-revenue names (NPST UPI payments, TVSELECT hardware) and the AI-hardware capex pool (NETWEB) are largely insulated from this channel.

Capital

Risk-off rotation out of high-beta and richly-valued IT mid/small caps (TATAELXSI PE 251, NETWEB beta 1.72, MOSCHIP) toward cheaper defensive large caps (TCS, INFY); some capital exits the IT sector entirely into non-cyclical defensives until Q1 FY27 results clarify the demand trajectory.

How it spreads across sectors

IT Services

Muted near-term price reaction with a demand-outlook overhang carried into Q1 FY27 results; relative preference for quality large caps.

Information Technology

Sentiment de-rating risk concentrated in richly-valued mid/small caps; domestic and AI-hardware names insulated.

When it plays out

Immediate

Mild negative open for IT large caps (historically within ±1-2% on Accenture read-through days); high-beta mid caps move more on sentiment.

Medium term

Direction set by actual booking/revenue trajectory; a richly-valued IT mid-cap cohort carries the most de-rating risk if softness is confirmed, while quality large caps with cheap valuations have limited downside.

Short term

Demand-outlook overhang persists into Q1 FY27 results season; watch management deal-pipeline and discretionary-spend commentary for confirmation or relief.

Who it hits first

  • No Indian company is NVIDIA; all exposure is second-order. Indian AI-server/HPC integrators (NETWEB) and chip/embedded-design firms (MOSCHIP, TATAELXSI) get a demand tailwind from the next-gen NVIDIA GPU platform.
  • IT services majors (TCS, INFY) face a two-sided impact: more AI-implementation/transformation demand vs faster automation of traditional services.

Who may gain

  • NETWEB — GPU/HPC server integration
  • BBOX — data-center and IT-infrastructure build-out
  • MOSCHIP — semiconductor/ASIC design
  • TATAELXSI — AI/embedded design services

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream, Indian enterprises, data-center operators and cloud/sovereign-AI buyers consume the new compute; cheaper/faster AI compute lowers their input cost and accelerates AI deployment, feeding services demand at TCS/INFY and infrastructure demand at BBOX.

Upstream

Upstream sits offshore — NVIDIA (TSMC-fabbed GPUs) is above every Indian name; Indian AI-server assemblers (NETWEB) and EMS players are downstream GPU buyers, so any advanced-GPU supply tightness or allocation limits could ration their kit availability.

Where demand moves

Business

New demand is created for GPU-server integration (NETWEB), data-center build-out (BBOX), chip/embedded design (MOSCHIP, TATAELXSI) and AI-implementation services (TCS, INFY). No Indian supplier loses business directly because none competes with NVIDIA; the platform is an input that lowers AI compute cost for downstream Indian buyers.

Capital

Capital rotates toward the AI-infrastructure theme — high-beta AI-server and chip-design small/mid-caps (NETWEB beta 1.72, MOSCHIP beta 1.11) absorb momentum flows first, while large-cap IT (TCS, INFY) acts as a cheaply-valued defensive anchor rather than a momentum leader.

How it spreads across sectors

IT Services

Mixed — AI-transformation services opportunity vs automation cannibalization of legacy work

Information Technology

Positive demand for AI-infrastructure build-out and AI services

Power

AI compute capacity expansion lifts data-center electricity demand over the medium term

codex additions

  • Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure
  • Electrical Equipment, Cables & Grid Hardware
  • Cooling, HVAC & Thermal Management
  • Electronics Manufacturing Services & Server Hardware
  • Telecom & Network Infrastructure
  • Industrial Automation & Capital Goods
  • Education, Skilling & Staffing
  • BFSI Technology Users
  • Water Treatment & Utilities for Data Centers

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

  • NVIDIA next-gen GPU platform launch
  • AI-server / GPU-cluster demand rises (NETWEB, EMS)
  • Data-center build-out accelerates (BBOX, data-center developers)
  • Power, cooling and electrical-equipment capex follows
  • Chip/embedded-design services demand rises (MOSCHIP, TATAELXSI)
  • IT-services AI-implementation demand vs automation offset (TCS, INFY)

Pattern name

Semiconductor Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Information Technology
  • IT Services
  • Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure
  • Electronics Manufacturing Services
  • Power
  • Cooling/HVAC
  • Telecom

When it plays out

Immediate

Sentiment pop in Indian AI-infra/server names (NETWEB, MOSCHIP) on the announcement; muted, headline-driven move for large-cap IT given the second-order, US-centric catalyst.

Medium term

A sustained AI-capex cycle lifts data-center, EMS, power and cooling demand; for IT services the automation-vs-implementation balance determines whether AI is net-accretive to revenue.

Short term

Watch for India deployment commitments (sovereign-AI / hyperscaler / enterprise capex) that convert the theme into actual order flow for server assemblers and data-center infrastructure.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Next-gen NVIDIA AI platforms increase demand for high-density GPU clusters -\u003e hyperscalers, enterprises and sovereign-AI programs need more Indian data-center capacity -\u003e listed data-center/infra providers benefit from higher leasing and capex.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","BBOX","TATACOMM"],"magnitude":"large","notes":"Most direct missed sector after IT; benefit depends on actual Indian deployment pace and power availability. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Data Centers \u0026 Digital Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI data centers require higher power density, substations, transformers, switchgear, UPS and cabling -\u003e data-center capex flows into electrical equipment and power-distribution suppliers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SIEMENS","ABB","POLYCAB"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Second-order capex beneficiary; order visibility may lag headlines. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Electrical Equipment, Cables \u0026 Grid Hardware","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher-performance GPUs increase rack power density and heat load -\u003e data centers need advanced cooling, chillers and precision air-conditioning -\u003e HVAC suppliers see incremental demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BLUESTARCO","VOLTAS","AMBER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude rises with liquid-cooling adoption in Indian AI data centers. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Cooling, HVAC \u0026 Thermal Management","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI-server demand grows around the new NVIDIA architecture -\u003e more local assembly, PCB, enclosure, power-module and systems-integration work -\u003e EMS firms benefit from localization tailwinds.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["KAYNES","SYRMA","DIXON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Strongest where firms have enterprise-electronics or server-adjacent manufacturing. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services \u0026 Server Hardware","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI workloads increase data traffic between users, edge nodes, clouds and data centers -\u003e demand rises for fiber, optical gear and data-center interconnects -\u003e telecom and network-equipment suppliers benefit.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","TEJASNET","STLTECH"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Indirect but defensible via cloud connectivity and edge-AI. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Telecom \u0026 Network Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Faster AI compute improves industrial AI, robotics and digital-twin adoption -\u003e manufacturers invest in automation hardware and control systems -\u003e automation/capital-goods suppliers get a demand tailwind.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CGPOWER","HONAUT","SCHNEIDER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Third-order adoption effect, not an immediate catalyst. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Industrial Automation \u0026 Capital Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"New AI infrastructure accelerates enterprise AI adoption -\u003e demand rises for AI engineers, cloud architects and reskilling -\u003e education/staffing platforms see higher course and placement demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","TEAMLEASE","NAUKRI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Offset risk: AI automation can reduce demand for lower-end staffing roles. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Education, Skilling \u0026 Staffing","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"More powerful AI infrastructure enables faster deployment of fraud analytics, underwriting automation and risk models -\u003e banks/insurers gain productivity but also face higher tech spend.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","ICICIBANK","SBILIFE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefits accrue via productivity, not direct NVIDIA-hardware revenue. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"BFSI Technology Users","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI data-center expansion increases requirements for cooling water, wastewater handling and utility-grade treatment -\u003e water-infrastructure firms see project opportunities around large campuses.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["WABAG","IONEXCHANG","THERMAX"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Relevant where data centers use water-intensive cooling. Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5.","sector":"Water Treatment \u0026 Utilities for Data Centers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Who it hits first

  • Indian IT-services / SaaS-automation vendors face a cheaper native agentic-AI substitute for custom automation and RPA-style deliverables
  • ER&D/design-services (TATAELXSI) and SaaS-product automation (CAPILLARY, AMAGI) face commoditization of agentic workflows
  • Note: Alphabet/Google are US-listed and not in the Indian knowledge graph — the India impact is an indirect 2nd-order competitive pressure on the IT cluster, not a direct corporate event on a domestic name

Who may gain

  • AI-infrastructure / HPC server builders (NETWEB) gain from rising AI inference-compute demand
  • Cybersecurity and enterprise adopters benefit as agentic adoption expands the attack surface and lowers automation cost

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream enterprise buyers (BFSI, retail, GCCs) gain a cheaper native automation substitute, pressuring per-seat/per-project pricing on mid-tier IT automation and RPA-style deliverables.

Upstream

Indian IT vendors' upstream is cloud/compute capacity (hyperscaler inference) and AI-model APIs; a cheaper native agentic model raises reliance on hyperscaler compute, shifting value upstream toward compute/data-centre and AI-server providers (NETWEB) and away from custom-automation labour.

Where demand moves

Business

Demand for bespoke agentic-automation builds shifts toward off-the-shelf Gemini computer-use; ER&D/SaaS-automation vendors (TATAELXSI, CAPILLARY, AMAGI) face substitution while AI-infrastructure builders (NETWEB) capture incremental inference-compute demand.

Capital

Capital rotates out of high-multiple Indian IT/tech names on AI-disruption fear (a DeepSeek-style de-rating), favouring AI-infrastructure/compute beneficiaries over labour-arbitrage automation plays.

How it spreads across sectors

IT Services

negative — agentic AI commoditizes mid-tier automation deliverables, pricing pressure on labour-arbitrage models

Information Technology

mixed — negative for pure-automation/services, positive for AI-infrastructure (compute, servers, data centres)

codex additions

  • BPM / BPO / KPO Services
  • Telecom / Connectivity
  • Data Centers / Digital Infrastructure
  • Power Utilities / Grid Equipment
  • Electrical & Cooling Equipment
  • Electronics Manufacturing / EMS
  • Cybersecurity
  • Banking & Financial Services
  • Staffing / Recruitment / HR Services
  • Education / Skilling

When it plays out

Immediate

Limited direct India price reaction expected (US product launch); modest sentiment pressure on high-multiple AI-exposed IT names, partial offset to AI-infra names like NETWEB.

Medium term

Structural commoditization risk for labour-arbitrage automation deliverables; AI-infrastructure and reskilling/cybersecurity beneficiaries strengthen.

Short term

Watch enterprise/GCC commentary on adopting native agentic tools vs custom IT builds; pricing pressure signals on automation deals.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Native computer-use agents automate browser, form-filling, reconciliation, support-ticket and back-office workflows -\u003e enterprises reduce dependence on labor-heavy managed process outsourcing -\u003e margin and volume pressure for routine BPM/KPO providers, partly offset by AI-managed service demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MPHASIS","PERSISTENT","LTIM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Listed pure-play BPO exposure is limited on NSE, so tickers are IT/BPM-adjacent names with enterprise operations exposure. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"BPM / BPO / KPO Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Agentic AI adoption increases API calls, cloud workloads, enterprise SaaS usage and edge connectivity needs -\u003e higher data traffic and enterprise connectivity demand -\u003e telecom operators benefit from network, cloud-connect and enterprise digital services spend.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","IDEA","TATACOMM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is indirect and depends on monetization of enterprise data/cloud connectivity rather than consumer tariffs. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Telecom / Connectivity","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"More agentic workloads shift automation from local/manual execution to cloud-hosted inference and orchestration -\u003e demand rises for data-center capacity, power-dense racks, networking and managed hosting -\u003e Indian digital infra providers see stronger utilization and capex cycles.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","TATACOMM","RAILTEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Strongest for companies with actual or planned data-center/cloud infrastructure exposure. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Data Centers / Digital Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI inference and data-center expansion raise electricity demand and power-quality requirements -\u003e utilities and grid equipment suppliers benefit from incremental load, transmission upgrades and backup-power investments.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","TATAPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Second-order impact; magnitude grows if AI data-center buildout accelerates materially in India. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Power Utilities / Grid Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher AI-server and data-center density increases demand for UPS systems, transformers, switchgear, precision cooling and thermal-management equipment -\u003e order books improve for electrical capital goods and cooling suppliers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","ABB"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"More direct than utilities where data-center capex translates into equipment orders. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Electrical \u0026 Cooling Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Enterprise AI adoption drives demand for servers, endpoints, networking devices and specialized hardware assembly -\u003e domestic EMS players may benefit from localization, PLI-linked manufacturing and enterprise hardware refresh cycles.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","KAYNES","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how much AI hardware assembly is localized versus imported. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing / EMS","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Computer-use agents can interact with browsers, apps and credentials -\u003e attack surface expands through prompt injection, automated phishing, session misuse and data leakage -\u003e enterprises increase spend on identity, endpoint, SOC and application security.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TANLA","NEWGEN","RATEGAIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"India has few pure-play listed cybersecurity names; tickers are security, workflow or enterprise-software adjacent. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Cybersecurity","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Banks, insurers and lenders can use GUI/browser agents for onboarding, KYC checks, claims, collections, reconciliations and customer service -\u003e operating cost improves, but vendor pricing pressure and model-risk/compliance costs rise.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","ICICIBANK","SBIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Large private banks may benefit most from automation scale; near-term impact is more cost-efficiency narrative than immediate earnings. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Banking \u0026 Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Agentic AI reduces demand for routine coding, testing, support and back-office roles while increasing demand for AI governance and integration talent -\u003e IT staffing mix shifts and billable headcount growth may slow.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TEAMLEASE","QUESS","SIS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Pressure is strongest for contract staffing tied to repetitive IT support and process roles. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Staffing / Recruitment / HR Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Rapid commoditization of automation work increases reskilling demand in AI operations, prompt engineering, governance, cybersecurity and cloud infrastructure -\u003e training platforms and education providers can see higher course demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","APTECHT","VERANDA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive but execution-dependent; consumer willingness to pay and placement outcomes matter. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5","sector":"Education / Skilling","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Who it hits first

  • No Indian-listed company is directly named — Anthropic is a US-private firm absent from the knowledge graph (analyzed from article content only).
  • US is close to reversing its June 12, 2026 export-control order that disabled Anthropic's Fable 5 frontier AI model for 15 days, normalizing global frontier-AI tooling availability.

Who may gain

  • Indian IT-services and GenAI-integration plays that build products on frontier models see a marginal, sentiment-level positive as AI delivery pipelines are de-risked — no direct revenue channel.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream Indian IT/GenAI integrators that embed frontier models in client deliverables (design engineering, cloud SI, media-SaaS) regain uninterrupted tooling; impact is delivery-continuity, not volume shortage.

Upstream

No physical upstream supply chain — frontier AI models are a software/API input; the only 'upstream' is access to the US-developed model itself, which restoration normalizes for Indian developer-consumers.

Where demand moves

Business

Restored frontier-AI model access removes a 15-day supply overhang on AI tooling used by Indian GenAI integrators (TATAELXSI, SILVERTUC, BBOX) for delivery; demand effect is indirect and accrues to AI-services pipelines rather than any disrupted physical supply chain.

Capital

Mild risk-on rotation into Indian AI-themed IT names as a US AI-policy overhang lifts; flows are sentiment-driven and likely concentrate in liquid mid/small-cap IT (NETWEB, TATAELXSI) rather than producing durable capital reallocation.

How it spreads across sectors

IT Services

Mild positive — AI-led delivery pipelines de-risked

Information Technology

Mild positive — frontier-AI tooling supply normalizes for GenAI-integration plays

codex additions

  • Data centres and digital infrastructure
  • Telecom and internet connectivity
  • Electronics manufacturing and AI hardware
  • Power equipment, cooling and electrical infrastructure
  • Cybersecurity and digital risk management
  • Banking and financial services
  • Education, skilling and training
  • Media, advertising and digital content
  • Pharma R&D and contract research

When it plays out

Immediate

Marginal positive sentiment for liquid AI-themed Indian IT names on the headline; no direct earnings impact.

Medium term

Normalized frontier-AI access supports the structural Indian GenAI-services and data-centre buildout theme; effect is diffuse and not company-specific.

Short term

If the reversal is confirmed, GenAI-integration narratives firm up; watch for AI-deal commentary in IT-services Q1 results.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Restored frontier-AI access -\u003e Indian enterprises resume GenAI pilots -\u003e higher cloud inference, storage and hosting demand -\u003e incremental demand for data-centre capacity and managed infrastructure","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","TATACOMM","NETWEB"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most impact is sentiment and demand-expectation led; stronger for companies already linked to data centres or AI compute.","sector":"Data centres and digital infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"AI tooling normalization -\u003e more enterprise AI workloads and API usage -\u003e higher data traffic, leased lines, edge connectivity and enterprise network demand","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","INDUSTOWER","TATACOMM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely diffuse, not a direct earnings trigger, but supports enterprise connectivity narratives.","sector":"Telecom and internet connectivity","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Frontier-model availability improves confidence in AI deployment -\u003e enterprises and cloud vendors expand servers, edge devices and high-end electronics procurement -\u003e benefits EMS and AI-server supply-chain names","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","KAYNES","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"India-listed exposure is mostly indirect through EMS and specialized electronics rather than frontier GPUs.","sector":"Electronics manufacturing and AI hardware","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"More AI compute adoption -\u003e higher data-centre power density and cooling needs -\u003e demand for electrical systems, automation, HVAC and backup power infrastructure","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ABB","SIEMENS","BLUESTAR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order capex linkage; materiality depends on actual data-centre buildout.","sector":"Power equipment, cooling and electrical infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Restored powerful AI tools -\u003e faster enterprise GenAI adoption plus greater phishing, code-generation and data-leak risks -\u003e demand for endpoint security, audits and secure AI governance","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUICKHEAL","TANLA","ROUTE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive for security demand, but also raises operational-risk concerns for AI-exposed firms.","sector":"Cybersecurity and digital risk management","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Stable access to frontier models -\u003e banks and insurers restart AI automation in underwriting, customer service, fraud detection and document processing -\u003e productivity and digital-transformation sentiment improves","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","ICICIBANK","SBIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large institutions benefit through efficiency optionality; near-term earnings impact is limited.","sector":"Banking and financial services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Frontier-AI availability normalizes -\u003e demand for GenAI training, corporate upskilling and AI-assisted learning products resumes -\u003e benefits listed education and training providers","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","APTECHT","VERANDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Smaller sector, so sentiment sensitivity can be higher despite indirect linkage.","sector":"Education, skilling and training","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Restored generative models -\u003e lower creative production costs and faster ad/content workflows -\u003e benefits digital content and ad-tech users, while increasing competitive pressure on legacy content economics","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NAZARA","ZEEL","PVRINOX"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Productivity upside is offset by IP, authenticity and content-commoditization risks.","sector":"Media, advertising and digital content","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Frontier-AI access normalizes -\u003e AI-assisted molecule screening, literature review and trial analytics workflows face less disruption -\u003e marginal positive for R\u0026D-heavy pharma and CRAMS names","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SUNPHARMA","DRREDDY","SYNGENE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Causal link is plausible but slow-moving; not an immediate trading catalyst.","sector":"Pharma R\u0026D and contract research","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

17 Aug 2026unspecified₹0.1
6 Mar 2026split₹0
6 Mar 2026bonus₹0
19 Aug 2025unspecified₹0.5
5 Sep 2024unspecified₹0.5
9 Sep 2022unspecified₹0.5
9 Jun 2022interim₹0.5

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 32 rows from NSE's archive (replace 25, delete 1, insert 6), 2018-09-17..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 17 Sep 2018

Insider trades

DisclosedWhoTypeSharesValue ₹ Cr
1 Oct 2026Vipul Haridas Thakkar · Promoter and DirectorBUY6000.01
11 Sep 2026Vipul Haridas Thakkar · Promoter and DirectorBUY1,0000.02
3 Sep 2026Vipul Haridas Thakkar · Promoter and DirectorBUY35,0000.59
1 Sep 2026Vipul Haridas Thakkar · Promoter and DirectorBUY14,0000.24
26 Aug 2026Vipul Haridas Thakkar · Promoter and DirectorBUY14,0000.25

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.