LTIMindtree Limited
NSE: LTMComputers - Software & Consulting
Share price
₹3,915.00
-0.38% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
75
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹1.17L Cr
P/E ratio
20.9
P/B ratio
4.8
ROCE
29.6%
ROE
23.1%
Dividend yield
1.9%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 13.9% over the past year, and 25.6% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 19.7% to 18.1% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 25.6% a year against a sector median of 14.5% — 11.1 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 20.9× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 14.0×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 35.0×, the 1st percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 3.0 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 7%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LTIMindtree Limited — this one | 7%/yr | 20.9× | ₹3.0 |
| Tata Consultancy Services | 8%/yr | 14.0× | ₹1.7 |
| Infosys | 8%/yr | 12.9× | ₹1.6 |
| HCL Technologies | 6%/yr | 17.6× | ₹2.9 |
| Wipro | 5%/yr | 12.6× | ₹2.5 |
| Tech Mahindra | 1%/yr | 24.9× | ₹24.9 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Computers - Software & Consulting), it ranks 13 of 53 on returns, 10 of 49 on growth, 30 of 52 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A wide advantage: it earns 29.6% on capital, ahead of 75% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹21361 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹4665 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹11381 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 97 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 37 days for its cash to waiting 26 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
9 of 9 checks clear · 100%
Latest result
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Results are expected soon.
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹1.17L Cr
- Prev close
- ₹3,915.00
- 52w High
- ₹6,430
- 52w Low
- ₹3,528
- Enterprise value
- ₹1.05L Cr
- Beta
- 1.1
- Price CAGR 1y
- -26.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- -9.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- -8.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 20.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 13.4%
- PEG ratio
- 3.0
- P/E ratio
- 20.9
- P/B ratio
- 4.8
- EV / EBITDA
- 13.2
- Industry P/E
- 18.1
- ROCE
- 29.6%
- ROCE 5y average
- 35.2%
- ROE
- 23.1%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.1
- Interest coverage
- 25.6
- Dividend yield
- 1.9%
- ROE 3y average
- 23.0%
- ROE last year
- 23.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹42,308 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹4,983 Cr
- Operating margin
- 18.0%
- Net profit margin
- 11.8%
- EBITDA margin
- 17.9%
- Sales growth 3y
- 8.4%
- Sales growth 5y
- 27.9%
- Profit growth 3y
- 7.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 23.0%
- EPS
- ₹169
- Sales growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 19.0%
- Dividend payout
- 44.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹11,608 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹1,469 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 18.0%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 17.1%
- OPM latest quarter
- 17.8%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹801
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹2,310 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹2,812 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹2,310 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 799.8
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹4,799 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹3,890 Cr
- FCF yield
- 3.1%
- Net cash flow
- ₹269 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 68.5%
- FII holding
- 6.3%
- DII holding
- 16.7%
- Public holding
- 8.3%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCS | 2,122.35 | 14.3 | 7,67,885 | 3.01 | 13,420.0 | 8.4 | 72,275.0 | 13.9 | 63.0 |
| Infosys | 1,004.40 | 13.1 | 4,07,613 | 4.80 | 7,775.0 | 12.3 | 48,211.0 | 14.0 | 40.0 |
| HCL Technologies | 1,208.40 | 18.1 | 3,27,919 | 4.46 | 4,626.0 | 20.3 | 34,579.0 | 13.9 | 30.4 |
| Wipro | 161.15 | 12.1 | 1,59,625 | 6.83 | 3,356.3 | 0.7 | 24,478.6 | 10.6 | 17.8 |
| Tech Mahindra | 1,514.90 | 27.9 | 1,48,484 | 3.36 | 1,486.3 | 28.4 | 15,711.9 | 17.7 | 23.1 |
| LTM | 3,965.00 | 21.0 | 1,17,610 | 1.90 | 1,468.6 | 16.9 | 11,608.0 | 18.0 | 29.6 |
| Persistent Systems | 5,578.00 | 44.2 | 87,993 | 0.73 | 483.0 | 13.7 | 4,303.2 | 29.1 | 34.4 |
| Median | 218.65 | 19.1 | 862 | 0.33 | 10.1 | 13.0 | 85.7 | 17.6 | 22.1 |
Competes with: 3i Infotech Limited, 63 moons technologies limited, Accelya Solutions India Limited, Aurionpro Solutions Limited, BIRLASOFT LIMITED, CG Vak Software & Exports Limited, CSM Technologies Limited, California Software Company Limited, Cambridge Technology Enterprises Limited, Ceinsys Tech Limited, Coforge, Cura Technologies Limited, Cybertech Systems And Software Limited, DRC Systems India Limited, Empower India Limited, Fractal Analytics Limited, GVP Infotech Limited, HCL Technologies, Happiest Minds Technologies Limited, Hexaware Technologies Limited, InfoBeans Technologies Limited, Infosys, Innovana Thinklabs Limited, Intellect Design Arena Limited, KPIT Technologies Limited, Ksolves India Limited, Latent View Analytics Limited, Magellanic Cloud Limited, Mastek Limited, Mindteck (India) Limited, Mphasis, NINtec Systems Limited, Newgen Software Technologies Limited, Orchasp Limited, Persistent Systems, Quintegra Solutions Limited, R. S. Software (India) Limited, Rategain Travel Technologies Limited, Saksoft Limited, SecMark Consultancy Limited, Silver Touch Technologies Limited, Softtech Engineers Limited, Sonata Software Limited, TREJHARA SOLUTIONS LIMITED, Tata Consultancy Services, Tata Elxsi Limited, Tech Mahindra, Trigyn Technologies Limited, Wipro, Xchanging Solutions Limited, Xtglobal Infotech Limited, Zensar Technologies Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 8,702 | 8,905 | 9,017 | 8,893 | 9,143 | 9,433 | 9,661 | 9,772 | 9,841 | 10,394 | 10,781 | 11,292 | 11,608 |
| Expenses | 7,067 | 7,274 | 7,432 | 7,357 | 7,536 | 7,734 | 8,068 | 8,176 | 8,191 | 8,464 | 8,778 | 9,319 | 9,547 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 6,467 | 6,381 | 6,468 | 6,549 | 6,890 | 6,962 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 1,709 | 1,811 | 1,997 | 2,229 | 2,429 | 2,586 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 1,636 | 1,631 | 1,585 | 1,536 | 1,606 | 1,699 | 1,593 | 1,596 | 1,649 | 1,930 | 2,003 | 1,973 | 2,061 |
| OPM % | 19 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 19 | 17 | 18 |
| Other Income | 132 | 143 | 220 | 208 | 227 | 299 | 212 | 251 | 392 | 300 | -363 | 237 | 255 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | -590 | 62 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 46 | 47 | 61 | 68 | 72 | 70 | 69 | 67 | 72 | 69 | 69 | 65 | 76 |
| Depreciation | 185 | 208 | 199 | 227 | 235 | 241 | 264 | 251 | 243 | 282 | 266 | 264 | 261 |
| Profit before tax | 1,536 | 1,519 | 1,545 | 1,448 | 1,526 | 1,687 | 1,472 | 1,529 | 1,726 | 1,879 | 1,305 | 1,881 | 1,978 |
| Tax % | 25 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 27 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
| Net Profit | 1,152 | 1,162 | 1,169 | 1,101 | 1,135 | 1,252 | 1,087 | 1,129 | 1,255 | 1,381 | 960 | 1,387 | 1,469 |
| EPS in Rs | 39 | 39 | 39 | 37 | 38 | 42 | 37 | 38 | 42 | 47 | 33 | 47 | 49 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 38 | 42 | 47 | 33 | 47 | 49 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,978 | 5,846 | 6,501 | 7,306 | 9,446 | 10,879 | 12,370 | 26,109 | 33,183 | 35,517 | 38,008 | 42,308 | 44,075 |
| Expenses | 3,973 | 4,819 | 5,271 | 6,119 | 7,562 | 8,849 | 9,645 | 20,860 | 27,075 | 29,130 | 31,513 | 34,752 | 36,109 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 24,623 | 26,287 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 6,891 | 8,466 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 1,005 | 1,028 | 1,230 | 1,187 | 1,883 | 2,029 | 2,725 | 5,249 | 6,108 | 6,387 | 6,495 | 7,555 | 7,966 |
| OPM % | 20 | 18 | 19 | 16 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 20 | 18 | 18 | 17 | 18 | 18 |
| Other Income | 99 | 187 | 187 | 426 | 302 | 329 | 274 | 766 | 557 | 702 | 990 | 566 | 430 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -528 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 10 | 6 | 3 | 16 | 11 | 83 | 79 | 123 | 150 | 222 | 279 | 276 | 280 |
| Depreciation | 158 | 174 | 178 | 156 | 147 | 273 | 332 | 597 | 723 | 819 | 992 | 1,054 | 1,072 |
| Profit before tax | 936 | 1,035 | 1,236 | 1,442 | 2,028 | 2,003 | 2,588 | 5,294 | 5,792 | 6,049 | 6,214 | 6,791 | 7,043 |
| Tax % | 18 | 19 | 21 | 23 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 26 | 27 | |
| Net Profit | 769 | 836 | 971 | 1,112 | 1,516 | 1,520 | 1,938 | 3,950 | 4,410 | 4,585 | 4,602 | 4,983 | 5,197 |
| EPS in Rs | 238 | 49 | 57 | 65 | 87 | 87 | 111 | 225 | 149 | 155 | 155 | 169 | 176 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 155 | 169 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 63 | 72 | 29 | 33 | 32 | 32 | 36 | 41 | 40 | 42 | 42 | 44 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 22%
- 5 years
- 28%
- 3 years
- 8%
- TTM
- 14%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 20%
- 5 years
- 23%
- 3 years
- 7%
- TTM
- 19%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 20%
- 5 years
- -8%
- 3 years
- -9%
- 1 year
- -26%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 27%
- 5 years
- 26%
- 3 years
- 23%
- Last year
- 23%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 16 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 18 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Reserves | 2,010 | 2,108 | 3,127 | 3,843 | 4,876 | 5,387 | 7,286 | 14,258 | 16,562 | 19,988 | 22,669 | 23,995 |
| Borrowings | 218 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 912 | 798 | 258 | 354 | 2,071 | 2,187 | 2,310 |
| Other Liabilities | 734 | 958 | 1,273 | 1,477 | 1,770 | 2,499 | 2,604 | 6,027 | 6,535 | 5,456 | 5,712 | 10,814 |
| Minority Interest | 13 | 83 | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 2,978 | 3,137 | 4,417 | 5,337 | 6,664 | 8,815 | 10,706 | 20,572 | 23,481 | 27,544 | 30,598 | 37,148 |
| Fixed Assets | 683 | 638 | 542 | 681 | 930 | 1,920 | 1,906 | 3,473 | 3,679 | 4,981 | 5,285 | 5,626 |
| CWIP | 25 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 59 | 66 | 503 | 902 | 551 | 681 | 922 |
| Investments | 104 | 43 | 941 | 1,264 | 1,740 | 2,219 | 3,730 | 6,048 | 5,458 | 8,744 | 9,845 | 12,568 |
| Other Assets | 2,166 | 2,437 | 2,934 | 3,385 | 3,982 | 4,617 | 5,004 | 10,548 | 13,442 | 13,269 | 14,787 | 18,033 |
| Total Assets | 2,978 | 3,137 | 4,417 | 5,337 | 6,664 | 8,815 | 10,706 | 20,572 | 23,481 | 27,544 | 30,630 | 37,196 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 642 | 858 | 1,170 | 844 | 1,395 | 1,644 | 2,400 | 3,251 | 3,095 | 5,670 | 4,546 | 4,799 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -103 | -40 | -961 | -452 | -749 | -643 | -1,657 | -1,643 | -271 | -3,918 | -1,729 | -1,604 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -497 | -817 | -33 | -408 | -594 | -890 | -509 | -1,680 | -1,932 | -2,269 | -2,574 | -2,926 |
| Net Cash Flow | 42 | 2 | 176 | -16 | 52 | 110 | 234 | -73 | 892 | -518 | 242 | 269 |
| Free Cash Flow | 448 | 744 | 1,101 | 746 | 1,242 | 1,401 | 2,133 | 2,198 | 2,160 | 4,836 | 3,612 | 3,890 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 80 | 73 | 66 | 70 | 71 | 78 | 61 | 64 | 62 | 59 | 56 | 64 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 80 | 73 | 66 | 70 | 71 | 78 | 61 | 64 | 62 | 59 | 56 | 64 |
| Working Capital Days | 58 | 49 | 43 | 60 | 53 | 42 | 33 | 37 | 44 | 36 | 39 | 26 |
| ROCE % | 48 | 47 | 46 | 42 | 47 | 37 | 37 | 48 | 38 | 32 | 28 | 30 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
attrition %
13.30pct
2026-06-30
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
client concentration top 10 pct
32.00pct
2026-06-30
revenue share of the top 20 clients
42.80pct
2026-06-30
revenue share of the top 5 clients
23.50pct
2026-06-30
clients above US$1 million of revenue
407count
2026-06-30
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
total loans / revolving facilities outstanding at period end, the base of loan_default_cr
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-12,538inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
48,10,460inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about LTIMindtree Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- 3i Infotech Limited
- 63 moons technologies limited
- Accelya Solutions India Limited
- Aurionpro Solutions Limited
- BIRLASOFT LIMITED
- CG Vak Software & Exports Limited
- CSM Technologies Limited
- California Software Company Limited
- Cambridge Technology Enterprises Limited
- Ceinsys Tech Limited
- Coforge
- Cura Technologies Limited
- Cybertech Systems And Software Limited
- DRC Systems India Limited
- Empower India Limited
- Fractal Analytics Limited
- GVP Infotech Limited
- HCL Technologies
- Happiest Minds Technologies Limited
- Hexaware Technologies Limited
- InfoBeans Technologies Limited
- Infosys
- Innovana Thinklabs Limited
- Intellect Design Arena Limited
- KPIT Technologies Limited
- Ksolves India Limited
- Latent View Analytics Limited
- Magellanic Cloud Limited
- Mastek Limited
- Mindteck (India) Limited
Buys from
- Adroit Infotech Limited · SAP delivery / subcontracted consulting capacity. Logo is the pre-merger 'L&T Infotech' ma…
- L&T Technology Services Limited
Sells to
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Information Technology
- Industry
- Computers - Software & Consulting
- Classification
- Information Technology › Computers - Software & Consulting
- ISIN
- INE214T01019
Business segments
- Banking, Financial Services & Insurance · 35%
- Technology, Media & Communications · 23%
- Manufacturing & Resources · 20%
- Consumer Business · 15%
- Healthcare, Life Sciences & Public Services · 6%
News impact
Big market events that reach LTIMindtree Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 15:03 IST · Market event · medium impact
Infosys shares recover from 52-week low after ABN AMRO deal extension
Infosys extended its ABN AMRO bank deal and its shares rose 0.71% to Rs 1001.20 off a 52-week low, helping Infosys holders while rivals and suppliers gain nothing.
Who it hits first
- Infosys, a large software-services firm, extended its deal with Dutch bank ABN AMRO.
- Its shares traded at Rs 1001.20, up 0.71% (Rs 7.10) from the Rs 994.10 previous close, recovering from a 52-week low.
- The pack carries no deal value or tenure, so the size of the retained revenue is unknown.
Who may gain
- Infosys (software services): keeps ABN AMRO revenue and steadies off its 52-week low.
- ABN AMRO (Dutch bank client): keeps its existing vendor instead of a risky switch.
- Infosys shareholders who bought near the 52-week low: up 0.71% on the day.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
ABN AMRO, the Dutch bank client, keeps its vendor; Infosys' listed downstream clients in the pack are two Indian banks, Axis Bank and ICICI Bank, whose own business this Dutch extension does not touch.
Upstream
Vendors that sell to Infosys — its listed suppliers in the pack — see no change, since extending an existing bank deal continues current work rather than placing new orders.
Where demand moves
Business
ABN AMRO keeps buying Infosys software services instead of rebidding the work — demand retained, not new — and no extra work flows to rivals or suppliers from an extension alone.
Capital
Investors nibbled Infosys up 0.71% off its 52-week low; there is no sympathy-buying case for peers since sector readthrough is nil.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
None for the banks: ABN AMRO is not listed here and Infosys' Indian bank clients are untouched by a Dutch extension.
Information Technology
Negligible: a single retained deal lifts only Infosys (+0.71%); rivals gain no business and the pack flags sector readthrough false.
When it plays out
Immediate
Infosys steadies near Rs 1000 over 1-7 days as extension relief offsets the 52-week-low overhang; peers drift on their own news.
Medium term
European bank renewals and client budgets over 1-6 months decide whether Infosys re-rates beyond this relief bounce.
Short term
Without a disclosed deal value, the stock needs quarterly results or fresh wins in 1-4 weeks to extend the recovery.
22 Sept, 19:22 IST · Market event · high impact
Persistent Systems Arm Raises Nagarro Stake To 83.25%, Aims To Delist From Frankfurt Stock Exchange
Persistent Systems is buying more of Nagarro to own 83.25% and delist it, which helps Persistent tighten control while IT rivals see no gain or loss.
Who it hits first
- Persistent Systems, an IT services company, is raising its holding in Nagarro to 83.25% through its arm.
- It plans to remove Nagarro shares from Frankfurt trading (a delist), moving toward full ownership and simpler control.
- The move uses cash for the buyout but lets Persistent fully steer Nagarro and combine its results.
Who may gain
- Persistent Systems gains tighter control and future profit pooling from owning 83.25% of Nagarro.
- Nagarro minority holders may get a buyout offer as part of the Frankfurt delisting.
- IT rivals see no direct benefit since no client work or orders shift to them.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, Persistent Systems lists no direct customers in this pack and Nagarro clients face no change, so no downstream demand shifts.
Upstream
Upstream, firms that supply Persistent Systems — SMARTWORKS and UDS for offices and facilities, ZAGGLE for expense tools — get no extra orders because buying shares does not use more office or support services.
Where demand moves
Business
No new business demand is created — this is an ownership change, not a fresh client order, so no extra work flows to Persistent or its peers.
Capital
Capital flows from Persistent to Nagarro minority holders for the extra shares, with mild positive sentiment for Persistent shares and no capital rotation to other IT names.
How it spreads across sectors
Information Technology
Peers like Infosys, TCS and others see no demand change; only light sentiment that Indian IT is consolidating, with no earnings impact.
When it plays out
Immediate
Persistent shares react to the 83.25% stake and delist aim; Nagarro minorities assess the offer.
Medium term
If delisted, Persistent consolidates Nagarro fully; integration progress drives any lasting gain.
Short term
Delist terms, funding and German approvals come into focus; peers drift with the market.
27 Aug, 04:35 IST · Market event · medium impact
US core inflation holds at 3.3% and headline edges to 3.7%, pushing Fed rate-hike bets higher and the dollar to its biggest gain in two weeks, while foreign funds cut India equity allocations and MUFG forecasts the rupee at 94 to the dollar
American inflation came in hotter than hoped, so traders now think the US central bank may raise interest rates. That makes the dollar stronger and the rupee weaker - good for Indian software and drug exporters who are paid in dollars, and a headwind for Indian shares that foreign investors are already selling.
Who it hits first
- Indian IT exporters are the direct beneficiaries. They bill clients in dollars and pay costs in rupees, so a weaker rupee widens the gap almost mechanically. MUFG's forecast of 94 to the dollar implies a further move from current levels.
- Indian equities as an asset class face the direct hit. Foreign funds have already cut their India allocation, and a higher US policy rate raises the return they can earn without leaving home.
Who may gain
- Dollar-earning exporters across IT and pharmaceuticals. Within IT, Tech Mahindra has the most percentage leverage because its margin is thinnest, while TCS has the largest absolute dollar base.
- The Reserve Bank of India's roughly $73 billion of accumulated inflows gives it ammunition to smooth rupee moves, which caps how far the currency gain can run.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US and European clients of Indian IT firms see no price change, since contracts are already in dollars. Indian consumers face slightly higher imported-goods prices, though the fall in crude below $90 a barrel offsets most of the imported-inflation effect that a weaker rupee would normally cause.
Upstream
Indian IT firms have no material dollar cost base other than onsite salaries in the United States, so a weaker rupee raises revenue far more than it raises cost - that asymmetry is the whole trade. Commercial landlords and telecom providers that serve IT campuses bill in rupees and see no change. Importers of electronics and capital equipment pay more rupees for the same goods.
Where demand moves
Business
No physical supply chain moves here - this is a price and currency effect. Indian exporters get more rupees for the same dollar of work billed, and Indian importers pay more rupees for the same dollar of goods. Because crude has separately fallen below $90 a barrel, the usual oil-import penalty from a weaker rupee is largely offset this time, which is why oil marketing companies are not flagged as losers. Electronics and capital equipment importers still pay more.
Capital
Foreign institutional money leaves Indian equities for higher-yielding dollar assets, and within India it concentrates in the largest and most liquid names first - State Bank of India, Reliance Industries and the large private banks. That money partly rotates into Indian IT, which is both a rupee hedge and a dollar earner, which is why IT can rise on the same news that pulls the index down.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Foreign outflows pressure large-cap banks; bond yields rise on the rate differential
Healthcare
Pharmaceutical exporters gain on the same dollar-revenue translation as IT
Information Technology
Rupee depreciation adds directly to reported revenue and margin
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
A weaker rupee raises the import bill, but crude falling below $90 a barrel offsets most of it this time
codex additions
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- US core PCE holds at 3.3% and headline reaches 3.7%
- Fed rate-hike bets rise and the dollar posts its biggest gain in two weeks
- The rupee weakens toward MUFG's 94 forecast
- Indian IT and pharmaceutical exporters gain on dollar revenue translated into more rupees
- Foreign institutional investors cut India equity exposure, hitting large-cap financials
- Indian bond yields rise on the widened rate differential
- The usual oil-import penalty is muted because crude has fallen below $90 a barrel
Pattern name
US Fed Cascade + Rupee Cascade (compound)
Sectors queried
- Information Technology
- Financial Services
- Healthcare
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
When it plays out
Immediate
IT stocks outperform on the rupee, while the index is dragged by foreign selling in large-cap financials. This divergence is the signature of the trade.
Medium term
The Reserve Bank's roughly $73 billion of accumulated inflows means it can defend the rupee, which limits how far the IT currency gain runs. The structural driver for Indian IT remains client spending, not the exchange rate.
Short term
Watch the next US inflation print and the Federal Reserve's September guidance. If the hike bets fade, the rupee tailwind for IT reverses quickly.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher Fed-hike expectations -\u003e stronger USD and weaker INR -\u003e imported inputs, chips, steel-linked components and crude-linked logistics become costlier -\u003e margin pressure for OEMs and auto ancillaries; higher domestic yields can also dampen vehicle financing demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MARUTI","M\u0026M","MOTHERSON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Export-heavy ancillaries may partly offset pressure through dollar revenues, so impact is not uniform.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"INR depreciation -\u003e imported feedstock and intermediates become costlier -\u003e margin compression for specialty and commodity chemical producers unless export pricing power offsets it; risk-off FII flows also pressure mid-cap cyclicals.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SRF","AARTIIND","NAVINFLUOR"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Export-oriented specialty names may benefit from translation gains, while import-dependent players face input-cost pressure.","sector":"Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stronger dollar and higher US real-rate expectations -\u003e pressure on global industrial commodity prices and EM risk appetite -\u003e weaker realizations for metal producers; INR weakness can cushion export realizations but raises imported coal/coking coal costs.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","HINDALCO","JSWSTEEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Aluminium and steel names face both global price and input-cost transmission.","sector":"Metals \u0026 Mining","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Fed-hike repricing -\u003e FII outflows and higher domestic yields -\u003e valuation compression for long-duration capex plays; weaker INR raises cost of imported machinery, electronics and components for project execution.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["LT","SIEMENS","ABB"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order books may remain healthy, but FX and discount-rate effects can pressure multiples.","sector":"Capital Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher global rates -\u003e upward pressure on Indian bond yields and funding costs -\u003e mortgage affordability and developer financing conditions weaken; FII risk reduction can also hit rate-sensitive domestic cyclicals.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Luxury demand may be more resilient, but listed real estate is sensitive to rate expectations.","sector":"Real Estate","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Weaker INR -\u003e aircraft leases, maintenance, fuel and dollar-linked costs rise in rupee terms -\u003e airline margins compress, especially if crude also stays firm or fare hikes lag cost inflation.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","SPICEJET"],"magnitude":"large","notes":"Sector has high USD cost exposure; limited NSE listed pure-play choices.","sector":"Aviation","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"INR depreciation -\u003e imported network equipment, spectrum-related vendor obligations and foreign-currency liabilities become costlier -\u003e capex intensity and leverage concerns rise; higher yields can also pressure highly indebted operators.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","IDEA","INDUSTOWER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large operators with pricing power may absorb pressure better than leveraged players.","sector":"Telecommunications","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stronger USD -\u003e imported components, compressors, panels, semiconductors and finished goods become costlier -\u003e gross margin pressure or price hikes; higher rates and weaker equity wealth effects can slow discretionary demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Electronics manufacturing services may see mixed effects depending on import content versus export incentives.","sector":"Consumer Durables","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Weaker INR -\u003e improves export competitiveness and dollar realizations for garment and home-textile exporters -\u003e potential order recovery from US buyers, though higher US rates may soften end-consumer demand.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["WELSPUNLIV","TRIDENT","GOKEX"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Currency benefit is real, but demand elasticity in the US retail channel caps magnitude.","sector":"Textiles \u0026 Apparel","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"INR weakness -\u003e imported coal, LNG and equipment costs rise -\u003e fuel-cost pass-through timing and working-capital needs worsen; higher bond yields raise financing costs for regulated and renewable projects.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["NTPC","TATAPOWER","JSWENERGY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Regulated utilities may pass through fuel costs eventually, but timing and leverage matter.","sector":"Power \u0026 Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
25 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · high impact
US proposes an extra $103,265 fee on every cap-subject H-1B petition, opening a 30-day comment window that could make the charge final by the end of 2026
America wants to charge more than $103,000 extra for each new H-1B work visa, the permit Indian software firms use to send engineers to US client sites - so sending an engineer becomes far dearer, and the companies that still rely on it face thinner profits until they hire more Americans or move the work back to India.
Who it hits first
- Every Indian IT services firm that files cap-subject H-1B petitions faces a $103,265 charge per new visa, on top of existing fees
- Tech Mahindra is the most exposed liquid name in the data ranking, followed by the rest of the large caps
- Onsite-heavy mid-caps - Coforge, Persistent, L&T Technology Services - carry more visas per rupee of revenue than the large caps
- Indian IT's already-elevated subcontracting bill rises further as firms hire costly local US contractors instead of moving people
Who may gain
- Firms with the highest offshore delivery mix - Infosys and HCLTech in this group - because the fee never touches work done from India
- Indian office-park landlords and data-centre operators, because work pushed back offshore needs seats and compute in India
- Staffing and flexi-hiring firms that supply local US contractors as a visa substitute
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, US enterprise clients of Indian IT face higher rate cards or slower project starts at renewal, and Indian office parks and data centres pick up the seats and compute for work that shifts back offshore.
Upstream
Upstream of the IT firms sit the immigration law firms, visa processing agents and relocation providers whose per-case volume falls as filings drop; Indian campus hiring also slows because the onsite career path that justified premium salaries narrows.
Where demand moves
Business
Work that needed an engineer on a US client site becomes roughly $103,000 more expensive to staff, so the same demand gets rerouted three ways: to offshore delivery centres in India, to locally-hired American staff, and to US-based subcontractors. The client's project does not disappear - it just gets served from a different chair, and the extra cost is split between the vendor's margin and the client's bill.
Capital
Money exits the onsite-heavy mid-caps (Coforge, Persistent, LTTS) first because their exposure per rupee of revenue is highest, and rotates into the offshore-heavy, cheaply-valued large caps - Infosys at PE 14.73 and HCLTech at 19.76 against a sector median of 24.01. Some rotates entirely out of IT into domestic-demand sectors while the comment period runs.
How it spreads across sectors
IT Services
Mid-caps with the heaviest onsite mix take the largest hit
Information Technology
Onsite delivery cost inflation, margin pressure at renewal, faster offshore shift
Services
Staffing, visa processing and relocation volumes fall while US subcontracting demand rises
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
IT stocks trade lower on the headline; the September 2025 precedent says a 2-4% one-day drop for large caps and 4%-plus for onsite-heavy mid-caps.
Medium term
If finalised by end-2026, expect a structural acceleration of offshore delivery, more local US hiring and a permanently higher subcontracting bill - a margin headwind of a few tenths of a percent rather than a revenue cliff.
Short term
The 30-day comment period is the live variable - Nasscom and US industry bodies will argue the fee is unlawful or unworkable, and any signal of dilution reverses the move quickly, exactly as it did in 2025.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher H-1B costs accelerate offshore delivery and GCC expansion in India, increasing demand for Grade-A office space in Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Pune and NCR.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","OBEROIRLTY","PHOENIXLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on whether firms add India seats rather than only absorb margin pressure.","sector":"Commercial real estate and office parks","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"More offshore delivery raises enterprise demand for secure connectivity, leased lines, cloud access and campus bandwidth for Indian delivery centers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","TATACOMM","INDUSTOWER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Incremental demand is plausible but spread across many large clients.","sector":"Telecom and digital connectivity infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Offshoring more work and expanding India-based GCC operations increases local hosting, colocation, cybersecurity and compute infrastructure needs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NETWEB","ANANTRAJ","TATACOMM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for companies exposed to enterprise infrastructure rather than pure consumer internet.","sector":"Data centers and enterprise cloud infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Visa-cost uncertainty pushes firms to rebalance staffing models, hire locally in India, use contractors, and expand recruitment/process outsourcing.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUESS","TEAMLEASE","SIS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Draft mentions staffing generally, but listed HR outsourcing/flexi-staffing could be a distinct tradable ripple.","sector":"HR outsourcing and flexi staffing","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower long-duration onsite deployment may reduce India-US relocation travel, but visa uncertainty can increase short business trips, transition visits and client-management travel.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["INDIGO","IXIGO","EASEMYTRIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Net effect is ambiguous because fewer deputations may be partly offset by more short-term travel.","sector":"Aviation and corporate travel","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If US work-visa economics worsen, Indian tech workers may redirect toward domestic upskilling, alternative geographies, management programs or certification-led career shifts.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","APTECHT","VERANDA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order and sentiment-driven; strongest if policy finalisation looks likely.","sector":"Education, upskilling and test-prep","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"More senior technology roles retained or created in India can support housing demand in IT-heavy cities, while weaker IT margins could hurt bonuses and affordability.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["PRESTIGE","BRIGADE","SOBHA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive seat-growth effect competes with potential pressure on IT employee compensation.","sector":"Urban residential real estate","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"IT-sector margin pressure and slower onsite wage growth can weigh on salary-linked consumption, mortgages and unsecured credit in tech-heavy urban borrower pools.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","ICICIBANK","KOTAKBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is diluted at large banks, but relevant through urban salaried borrower sentiment.","sector":"Banking and retail credit","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If IT exporters protect margins through slower hikes or hiring caution, discretionary spending by technology employees may soften in metros.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","M\u0026M","MARUTI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More likely a sentiment ripple than an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Consumer discretionary and autos","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
12 Aug, 04:23 IST · Market event · medium impact
US Homeland Security extends the 9-11 Response and Biometric Entry-Exit Fee to H-1B and L-1 extension-of-stay petitions, raising the running cost of keeping Indian IT staff in the US
America now charges Indian IT firms an extra fee every time they renew a worker's US visa, not just for new ones - a small but permanent cost that nibbles at profit margins at TCS, Infosys, Wipro and Tech Mahindra, and hits hardest at firms keeping the most staff on US soil.
Who it hits first
- Every Indian IT firm renewing a US-based worker's stay pays an additional per-petition fee, compounding across thousands of filings a year.
- Tech Mahindra, with the highest share of work done on US soil among the large caps, files the most extensions per rupee of revenue and so carries the highest cost intensity.
- The fee lands on operating margin because it cannot easily be re-billed to clients under fixed-price contracts already signed.
Who may gain
- Firms with the lowest onsite mix - HCLTech in particular - gain relative cost advantage, because the fee scales with how many people a firm keeps inside the United States.
- Global capability centres and offshore delivery models become relatively cheaper than onsite deployment, accelerating a shift Indian IT has been making for a decade.
- Nearshore delivery locations such as Mexico, Canada and Latin America gain share of work that would otherwise sit on a US visa.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US enterprise clients ultimately absorb some of this at contract renewal through higher onsite rates, or accept more offshore delivery in the same contract. Clients in regulated industries - banking, healthcare - that require onsite presence have the least flexibility and will pay the most.
Upstream
Indian IT's upstream is people. Campus hiring and offshore-centre capacity in India become relatively more attractive than deputing staff to the US, so Indian staffing and training providers see steadier demand while US-based subcontractor and visa-processing costs rise.
Where demand moves
Business
No customer demand is created or destroyed by this - the same US clients still need the same work done. What changes is where the work physically sits. A per-petition fee makes each onsite seat more expensive, so firms shift billable hours offshore to India or nearshore to Canada and Mexico. Indian delivery centres therefore gain headcount while US-based project teams shrink, and immigration law firms and visa processing vendors get more, not less, work.
Capital
Investors treat visa cost news as a margin story rather than a growth story, so the reaction is a mild de-rating of the most onsite-heavy names rather than a sector exit. Money rotates within IT toward the offshore-heavy, high-margin names - HCLTech and TCS - and away from Tech Mahindra and Wipro. The weaker rupee at 95.43 per dollar is a simultaneous tailwind for all six that partly cancels this out.
How it spreads across sectors
Information Technology
A recurring per-head cost lands on operating margin, concentrated in the firms with the largest US-onsite footprint, and accelerates the structural shift of billable work offshore.
When it plays out
Immediate
A modest, mostly sentiment-driven markdown of the onsite-heavy names; nothing like the September 2025 shock because the per-head amount is far smaller.
Medium term
A permanent nudge toward offshore and nearshore delivery. Combined with rising US immigration costs generally, it strengthens the case for global capability centres in India and erodes the traditional onsite-heavy staffing model.
Short term
Firms quantify the annual cost in September-quarter commentary. Watch for guidance on onsite mix reduction and any move to re-price contracts at renewal.
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 25 May 2026 | unspecified | ₹53 |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2025 | interim | ₹22 |
| 23 May 2025 | unspecified | ₹45 |
| 25 Oct 2024 | interim | ₹20 |
| 19 Jun 2024 | unspecified | ₹45 |
| 27 Oct 2023 | interim | ₹20 |
| 10 Jul 2023 | unspecified | ₹40 |
| 31 Jan 2023 | interim | ₹20 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 6 rows from NSE's archive (replace 0, delete 0, insert 6), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
- nse-rename-history fill: 1578 NSE bars before cutoff, ISIN INE214T01019@2016-07-21, symbols LTI (docs/nse_rename_history.md)1× · 5 Dec 2022
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call11 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Annual report · 2025-268 May 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.