Solara Active Pharma Sciences Limited
NSE: SOLARAPharmaceuticals
Share price
₹654.90
-4.21% close of 8 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 5 Oct 2026, the close above is 8 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
37
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹2,947 Cr
P/E ratio
736.8
P/B ratio
1.9
ROCE
4.9%
ROE
-0.2%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 15.5% over the past year, and -1.6% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from -17.8% to 13.2% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew -1.6% a year against a sector median of 13.1% — 14.6 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Its profit has collapsed to almost nothing, so the current price-to-profit number is meaningless — there is no honest multiple to compare with its past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its profit has collapsed to almost nothing, so the price-to-profit number is meaningless — growth cannot be weighed against a price like that.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solara Active Pharma Sciences Limited — this one | 25%/yr | — | — |
| Divi's Laboratories | 13%/yr | 83.3× | ₹6.4 |
| Torrent Pharmaceuticals | 22%/yr | 78.7× | ₹3.6 |
| Zydus Lifesciences | 32%/yr | 23.1× | ₹0.72 |
| Laurus Labs Limited | 4%/yr | 98.6× | ₹24.7 |
| Cipla | 10%/yr | 29.6× | ₹3.0 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Pharmaceuticals), it ranks 103 of 130 on returns, 120 of 127 on growth, 84 of 130 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 4.9% on capital, ahead of 21% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹389 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹451 crore on plant and equipment, ₹62 crore more than it made, paid from its own cash and investments. It has not made a profit over 9 years.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
5 of 9 checks clear · 56%
Latest result
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Results are expected soon.
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹2,947 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹654.90
- 52w High
- ₹774
- 52w Low
- ₹422
- Enterprise value
- ₹3,581 Cr
- Beta
- 0.9
- Price CAGR 1y
- 16.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 31.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- -13.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- -0.3%
- PEG ratio
- 29.8
- P/E ratio
- 736.8
- P/B ratio
- 1.9
- EV / EBITDA
- 18.7
- Industry P/E
- 38.0
- ROCE
- 4.9%
- ROCE 5y average
- 0.8%
- ROE
- -0.2%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.5
- Interest coverage
- 0.9
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- -12.0%
- ROE last year
- 0.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹1,369 Cr
- Annual profit
- -₹7 Cr
- Operating margin
- 14.0%
- Net profit margin
- -0.5%
- EBITDA margin
- 13.7%
- Sales growth 3y
- -1.8%
- Sales growth 5y
- -3.3%
- Profit growth 3y
- 25.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- —
- EPS
- ₹-2.1
- Sales growth TTM
- 15.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -83.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹382 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹16 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 19.6%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 45.5%
- OPM latest quarter
- 16.2%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹278
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹687 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹50 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹687 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 26.8
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹153 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹101 Cr
- FCF yield
- 0.2%
- Net cash flow
- ₹1 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 41.9%
- FII holding
- 11.5%
- DII holding
- 3.7%
- Public holding
- 42.8%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun Pharma.Inds. | 1,782.00 | 33.9 | 4,27,562 | 0.89 | 2,901.2 | 6.0 | 15,299.9 | 10.5 | 20.5 |
| Divi's Lab. | 9,212.85 | 82.1 | 2,44,572 | 0.32 | 902.0 | 65.5 | 3,080.0 | 27.8 | 22.0 |
| Torrent Pharma. | 4,755.15 | 81.1 | 1,80,871 | 0.80 | 566.0 | 5.8 | 4,921.0 | 54.9 | 15.2 |
| Zydus Lifesci. | 1,138.50 | 23.3 | 1,13,610 | 0.09 | 990.2 | -35.1 | 8,017.0 | 22.0 | 21.1 |
| Cipla | 1,335.50 | 30.1 | 1,07,663 | 0.97 | 785.6 | -39.2 | 7,119.3 | 2.3 | 15.5 |
| Laurus Labs | 1,964.00 | 97.0 | 1,06,117 | 0.10 | 362.1 | 125.5 | 2,026.3 | 29.1 | 17.8 |
| Mankind Pharma | 2,479.95 | 48.1 | 1,02,433 | 0.04 | 574.1 | 29.6 | 4,030.6 | 12.9 | 13.5 |
| Solara Active | 678.00 | 770.6 | 3,290 | 0.00 | 16.3 | 55.0 | 381.6 | 19.6 | 4.9 |
| Median | 404.00 | 34.2 | 2,150 | 0.06 | 13.2 | 29.6 | 160.3 | 18.6 | 14.9 |
Competes with: Cipla, Divi's Laboratories, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Laurus Labs Limited, Lupin, Mankind Pharma Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical, Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Zydus Lifesciences
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 352 | 425 | 212 | 299 | 363 | 347 | 300 | 273 | 319 | 314 | 349 | 387 | 382 |
| Expenses | 333 | 388 | 374 | 290 | 322 | 286 | 243 | 228 | 262 | 279 | 312 | 330 | 320 |
| Material Cost | 144 | 165 | 150 | 176 | 182 | 181 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -31 | -19 | 4.31 | 8.17 | 14 | 15 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 5.05 | 0 | 0 | 2.72 | 0.77 | 0.86 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 52 | 54 | 55 | 55 | 55 | 56 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 57 | 62 | 70 | 70 | 77 | 67 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 19 | 38 | -162 | 10 | 42 | 61 | 58 | 45 | 57 | 35 | 37 | 58 | 62 |
| OPM % | 5.43 | 8.85 | -76 | 3.26 | 12 | 18 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 16 |
| Other Income | 2 | -4 | -62 | -120 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 0 | -7 | 6 | 3 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | -6.75 | 0.86 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 25 | 24 | 25 | 31 | 31 | 28 | 27 | 29 | 24 | 21 | 22 | 28 | 22 |
| Depreciation | 26 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 26 | 26 | 27 |
| Profit before tax | -29 | -17 | -275 | -167 | -13 | 8 | 8 | -2 | 11 | -10 | -17 | 10 | 16 |
| Tax % | -35 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net Profit | -19 | -17 | -275 | -255 | -13 | 8 | 8 | -2 | 11 | -10 | -17 | 10 | 16 |
| EPS in Rs | -4.07 | -3.58 | -57 | -53 | -3.74 | 2.22 | 2.24 | -0.58 | 2.91 | -2.79 | -4.82 | 2.65 | 3.38 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -0.93 | 2.46 | -2.36 | -3.98 | 2.20 | 3.52 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 521 | 1,387 | 1,322 | 1,617 | 1,268 | 1,444 | 1,289 | 1,284 | 1,369 | 1,431 |
| Expenses | 464 | 1,174 | 1,062 | 1,231 | 1,188 | 1,309 | 1,384 | 1,077 | 1,182 | 1,240 |
| Material Cost | 582 | 673 | ||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 39 | 8.25 | ||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 5.75 | 3.49 | ||||||||
| Employee Cost | 212 | 219 | ||||||||
| Other Expenses | 239 | 279 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 57 | 213 | 260 | 386 | 81 | 134 | -95 | 206 | 187 | 192 |
| OPM % | 11 | 15 | 20 | 24 | 6 | 9 | -7 | 16 | 14 | 13 |
| Other Income | 2 | 12 | 27 | 29 | 16 | 22 | -185 | 8 | 0 | 2 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -5.89 | ||||||||
| Interest | 25 | 82 | 78 | 84 | 75 | 90 | 105 | 115 | 95 | 92 |
| Depreciation | 34 | 83 | 94 | 109 | 112 | 111 | 103 | 99 | 100 | 103 |
| Profit before tax | 0 | 60 | 115 | 222 | -91 | -45 | -488 | 0.54 | -7.41 | -2 |
| Tax % | -70 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -36 | -50 | 16 | 0 | 0 | |
| Net Profit | 0 | 59 | 115 | 221 | -58 | -22 | -567 | 0.54 | -7.41 | -2 |
| EPS in Rs | 17 | 32 | 46 | -12 | -4.62 | -118 | 0.15 | -2.05 | -1.58 | |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.14 | -1.68 | ||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 22 | 5 | 11 | 0 | -49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -3%
- 3 years
- -2%
- TTM
- 15%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 25%
- TTM
- -83%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -13%
- 3 years
- 31%
- 1 year
- 16%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -7%
- 3 years
- -12%
- Last year
- 0%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 25 | 26 | 27 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 40 | 45 |
| Reserves | 739 | 930 | 1,059 | 1,553 | 1,489 | 1,464 | 898 | 1,054 | 1,208 |
| Borrowings | 633 | 538 | 722 | 621 | 1,037 | 1,013 | 1,012 | 796 | 687 |
| Other Liabilities | 425 | 466 | 346 | 404 | 383 | 386 | 406 | 342 | 393 |
| Minority Interest | 2.67 | 2.67 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities | 1,821 | 1,960 | 2,153 | 2,614 | 2,945 | 2,899 | 2,351 | 2,232 | 2,333 |
| Fixed Assets | 1,086 | 1,218 | 1,397 | 1,382 | 1,356 | 1,364 | 1,268 | 1,193 | 1,238 |
| CWIP | 71 | 40 | 40 | 88 | 239 | 238 | 256 | 280 | 205 |
| Investments | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Other Assets | 663 | 701 | 716 | 1,144 | 1,350 | 1,295 | 825 | 757 | 886 |
| Total Assets | 1,821 | 1,960 | 2,153 | 2,614 | 2,945 | 2,899 | 2,351 | 2,232 | 2,333 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 49 | 166 | 242 | 155 | -242 | 156 | 109 | 213 | 153 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -85 | -113 | -359 | -106 | -243 | -81 | -4 | -37 | -99 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 68 | -23 | 97 | 92 | 334 | -113 | -106 | -180 | -54 |
| Net Cash Flow | 31 | 30 | -20 | 142 | -151 | -38 | -0 | -4 | 1 |
| Free Cash Flow | 14 | 108 | -25 | -16 | -451 | 46 | 69 | 173 | 101 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 184 | 76 | 63 | 109 | 141 | 136 | 99 | 93 | 117 |
| Inventory Days | 252 | 111 | 170 | 149 | 321 | 258 | 163 | 185 | 170 |
| Days Payable | 420 | 127 | 132 | 156 | 154 | 142 | 142 | 144 | 146 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 16 | 60 | 101 | 102 | 308 | 252 | 120 | 134 | 140 |
| Working Capital Days | -124 | -22 | -32 | 16 | 37 | 20 | -128 | -62 | -24 |
| ROCE % | 10 | 12 | 15 | -0 | 2 | -9 | 6 | 5 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
total loans / revolving facilities outstanding at period end, the base of loan_default_cr
483cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
634inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
82,02,397inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Solara Active Pharma Sciences Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Key Starting Materials (KSMs) and API intermediates
- Process solvents (acetone, etc.)
Sells drug ingredients to
Sells to
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Industry
- Pharmaceuticals
- Classification
- Healthcare › Pharmaceuticals
- ISIN
- INE624Z01016
Plants
- Ambernath API facility · Ambernath, Maharashtra
- Cuddalore API facility · Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu
- Mangaluru API facility · Mangaluru, Karnataka
- Mysuru intermediate facility · Mysuru, Karnataka
- Puducherry API facility · Puducherry, Puducherry
- Visakhapatnam API facility
News impact
Big market events that reach Solara Active Pharma Sciences Limited, and how the effect spreads.
30 Sept, 15:02 IST · Market event · high impact
Apollo, Max Health, Yatharth, KIMS hospital stocks under pressure after SC remarks on drug prices
The top court suggested capping hospital medicine margins at 16%, hurting hospital shares like Apollo and Max while patients would pay less.
Who it hits first
- The top court remarked that medicines sold inside hospitals should carry only a 16% margin cap, which would cut the profit hospitals make when they give drugs to admitted patients.
- Apollo Hospitals, a large hospital chain, Max Healthcare, a hospital operator, Yatharth Hospital, a hospital group, and Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, a hospital chain, all saw their shares come under pressure as investors priced in thinner drug margins.
- Other hospital operators that compete with these four face the same margin question even though they were not named in the headlines.
Who may gain
- Patients admitted to private hospitals, who would pay less for medicines if the 16% cap is enforced
- Employers and public bodies that reimburse staff hospital bills, such as the large public firms Yatharth Hospital serves, which would face smaller drug bills
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Hospital pharmacies sell to admitted patients and to the employers that reimburse staff care, so lower drug prices leave patients and payers with smaller bills while the hospitals absorb the margin loss.
Upstream
No direct drug-supplier hit is evidenced since the pack shows no medicine maker supplying the four hospitals, though drug makers broadly could face price pressure if hospitals push costs back up the chain.
Where demand moves
Business
Hospitals keep less profit on every medicine given to admitted patients, so income per patient falls even though patients still need the same drugs.
Capital
Investors sell hospital shares and shift money toward parts of Healthcare less tied to in-hospital drug sales, keeping Apollo, Max, Yatharth, KIMS and their listed hospital peers under near-term pressure.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
Hospital operators face a shared squeeze on in-hospital drug profits that drags peer shares lower, while drug makers see an unclear read-through with no maker-specific hit evidenced.
When it plays out
Immediate
Hospital shares stay under pressure over the next few days as traders sell first and ask how much profit comes from drug sales.
Medium term
If a 16% cap is enforced over the coming months, hospitals rework billing and press suppliers while investors reset earnings, but if the remarks are diluted the fear-driven part of the fall reverses.
Short term
Moves over the next few weeks depend on whether the court turns remarks into a written order and which medicines it covers, with hospital managers likely to guide on drug-profit share.
30 Sept, 03:15 IST · Market event · medium impact
Top court seeks 16% MRP cap on medicines
India's top court has proposed capping medicine retail prices at 16% over cost, which would squeeze drug makers' profits while making medicines cheaper for patients.
Who it hits first
- India's top court has asked for a rule that would cap the shop price of medicines at 16% above cost, which would directly cut how much drug makers earn on each strip sold in India.
- Sun Pharmaceutical, India's largest medicine maker, and Cipla, a big maker of breathing and everyday drugs, were named in the story and would feel the squeeze first on their home-market sales.
- The proposal is still a court suggestion, not a final price order, so the immediate hit is fear and headlines rather than actual bills changing at chemists.
Who may gain
- Patients and families buying daily medicines, who would pay less at the chemist if prices are capped.
- Government health schemes and bulk buyers, whose drug bills would fall if the cap sticks.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream chemists, distributors and hospital pharmacies, including hospital chain Apollo Hospitals, would earn thinner markups per pack but could see more footfall as lower prices make treatment more affordable.
Upstream
Upstream ingredient makers such as Divi's Laboratories and Laurus Labs, which supply bulk ingredients to Sun Pharmaceutical and Cipla, face second-hand pressure as pill makers try to push price cuts back onto suppliers, though cheaper pills needing the same ingredients could keep order volumes steady.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand shifts from price to volume: chemists sell more strips as pills get cheaper, but drug makers collect fewer rupees per strip, so revenue depends on whether extra sales make up for lower prices.
Capital
Investor money turns cautious on home-focused drug makers like Sun Pharmaceutical and Cipla, pausing fresh buying until the court clarifies the scope, while export-heavy ingredient makers see little change in orders.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
Drug makers face margin pressure on India sales, ingredient suppliers feel mild second-hand haggling, and hospitals see small pharmacy drag offset by steadier patient flow.
When it plays out
Immediate
1-7 days: drug stocks wobble on headlines as traders price in fear, with Sun Pharmaceutical and Cipla slipping a few percent while details stay unclear.
Medium term
1-6 months: if a final cap lands, home-market margins reset lower and makers push volumes, cost cuts and new launches; if diluted, prices and shares drift back to normal.
Short term
1-4 weeks: focus shifts to court hearings and government reply; if the scope narrows to a few essential drugs, shares steady, but talk of a broad cap keeps pressure on.
22 Sept, 19:57 IST · Market event · medium impact
Fortis audit order could drag listed firms into promoters' personal debt cases: InGovern
Delhi court ordered a forensic audit of hospital chain Fortis, spooking investors about promoter-debt risk in high-pledge healthcare stocks while rival hospitals see only mixed fallout.
Who it hits first
- Fortis Healthcare, the hospital chain, faces a court-ordered forensic audit, meaning outside accountants will dig through its books while investors price in governance risk.
- InGovern, the governance adviser, warns the order could let lenders chase listed companies for their promoters' (founding owners') personal debts, blurring the line between a company and its owners.
- Hospital shares with heavy promoter pledging (founders' shares posted as loan collateral), like Aster DM at 40.66% pledged and Cohance at 94.56% pledged, face the sharpest sentiment hit.
- Stronger hospital operators such as Apollo and Max, with solid returns and low pledges, face only a mild sector-wide discount rather than a direct hit.
Who may gain
- Rival hospital chains like Apollo Hospitals and Max Healthcare could pick up a few patients if Fortis managers are distracted by the audit, though the pack shows no booking shift yet.
- Governance advisers and law firms that run forensic audits and promoter-debt opinions may win fresh mandates from cautious boards.
- Low-pledge, high-return drug makers may look relatively safer as cautious investors rotate away from pledged names.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Fortis sells care directly to patients rather than to companies (the pack lists no downstream customers), so there is no buyer order chain to disrupt — the hit lands on patient confidence and the share price, not on a customer.
Upstream
NephroPlus, the dialysis operator named as a Fortis supplier, plus Interarch, the building-products supplier, face no direct order cut since a book audit cancels no dialysis sessions or hospital buildings, though a long probe could slow Fortis expansion orders.
Where demand moves
Business
Hospital visits and planned surgeries at Fortis could soften if patients and referring doctors turn cautious during the audit, with a small spillover of footfall to nearby Apollo, Max and Aster hospitals; drug and lab-equipment orders show no direct change since the order targets books, not prescriptions.
Capital
Investors are likely to trim Fortis and high-pledge healthcare names and rotate toward low-pledge, high-return peers or cash, widening the gap between PE 63.48 Fortis and names nearer sector median 44.03.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Lenders and NBFCs (shadow banks) watch whether courts let them reach listed-company assets for promoter loans, which could reshape collateral terms over months.
Healthcare
Hospital stocks trade with a wider governance discount, sharpest for high-pledge names, while drug makers with no hospital link barely move.
When it plays out
Immediate
Fortis shares wobble on audit headlines and governance commentary while high-pledge peers slip in sympathy.
Medium term
Audit findings decide the path — a clean report unwinds the discount, while adverse findings or an upheld precedent invite fresh risk talk.
Short term
Lawyers parse the court order's scope; any clarification limiting the precedent calms peers, while talk of wider enforcement keeps pledged names soft.
15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · medium impact
New norms for faster drug rollout proposed; industry hails move
India plans to approve new medicines faster — good for drug makers like Sun Pharma that launch the most products.
Who it hits first
- Launch-heavy drug makers (Sun, Cipla) gain months of extra sales per approval.
- API suppliers and CDMOs see more client molecules to make.
- Hospitals unaffected — approvals do not fill beds.
Who may gain
- Sun Pharma most in absolute terms; quality API makers (Gujarat Themis) on volumes.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Distributors and pharmacies stock more new products; hospitals mostly unaffected.
Upstream
API and intermediate makers gain volumes as more launches need ingredients.
Where demand moves
Business
Approval queues shorten; API/CDMO order books lengthen; patients access drugs sooner.
Capital
Money rotates into launch-heavy pharma and quality API names; avoids weak-balance-sheet theme traps.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
Pharma and CDMO positive with a lag; hospitals neutral; weak names are value traps.
When it plays out
Immediate
Pharma stocks firm 1-3% on sentiment; weak names jump most (sell the jump).
Medium term
Actual approval acceleration over 1-3 years compounds launch-heavy winners.
Short term
Draft details and implementation dates decide how much is real vs hope.
15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · high impact
Piramal Pharma Morpeth UK facility gets 7 FDA observations after Sep 3-11 inspection
A US drug watchdog found seven problems at Piramal Pharma UK factory — bad for its shares, while rival drug makers should barely feel it.
Who it hits first
- Piramal Pharma faces CDMO order pauses, deeper client audits and remediation costs at Morpeth.
- Seven observations exceed its own 4-observation precedents, signaling a tougher inspection outcome.
- Small pharma peers derate on sentiment as investors re-check Indian plant quality systems.
Who may gain
- Large quality leaders (Sun, Divi) may pick up marginal CDMO inquiries — too small to trade.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US clients of Morpeth qualify backup suppliers slowly; no drug shortages indicated.
Upstream
No direct supply-chain link — this is a plant-quality event, not a supply disruption; API suppliers to Morpeth see minor order delays.
Where demand moves
Business
CDMO clients slow new Piramal orders and audit harder; no demand transfers at scale to peers.
Capital
Money trims small-pharma exposure on regulatory headlines; rotates to large quality pharma and hospitals-on-facts.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
CDMO/API sentiment hit; hospitals untouched operationally; large pharma flat per precedent.
When it plays out
Immediate
Piramal stock down 2-5% on the headline; small peers dip 1-3% on sentiment.
Medium term
Clean re-inspection closes the episode; warning letter or import alert would extend damage to quarters.
Short term
Company corrective-action response and FDA classification (VAI vs OAI) decide whether this fades or escalates.
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 18 Aug 2021 | unspecified | ₹3 |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Nov 2020 | interim | ₹4 |
| 28 Jul 2020 | unspecified | ₹2 |
| 6 Aug 2019 | unspecified | ₹5 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 6), 2020-02-01..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 1 Feb 2020
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 2,83,420 | ₹626.19 |
| 20 Aug 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 2,82,513 | ₹626.82 |
| 10 Jul 2026 | TPG GROWTH IV SF PTE LTD | SELL | 3,00,000 | ₹573.20 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2625 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY2723 Jul 2026
- Annual report · 2024-252 Sep 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.