Fin Cascade

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

Themis Medicare Limited

NSE: THEMISMEDPharmaceuticals

Share price

₹108.57

-0.13% close of 9 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹977 CrP/E —

Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

29

out of 100 · worked out 9 Oct 2026

How the business score works

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹977 Cr

P/E ratio

—

P/B ratio

2.5

ROCE

2.7%

ROE

0.5%

Dividend yield

0.5%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹137.7152-week low ₹66.07

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Sales fell 12.8% over the past year. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 19.9% to -12.1% over the last four years.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

It grew 4.4% a year against a sector median of 13.1% — 8.7 percentage points slower.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

It has no earnings, so there is no price-to-earnings to compare.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

It has no earnings to weigh the price against.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
Themis Medicare Limited — this one-69%/yr——
Dr Reddy's Laboratories-4%/yr31.2×—
Mankind Pharma Limited17%/yr45.5×₹2.7
Aurobindo Pharma23%/yr26.0×₹1.1
Lupin140%/yr14.9×—
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited61%/yr20.6×₹0.34

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Pharmaceuticals), it ranks 112 of 130 on returns, 106 of 127 on growth, 120 of 130 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 2.7% on capital, ahead of 14% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹104 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹85 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹49 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 73 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 72 days for its cash to waiting 138 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

6 of 10 checks clear · 60%

How the profit check works

Latest result · Q1 FY27

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Announced 13 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited

Revenue

₹87 Cr

Revenue vs last year

-10.9%

Revenue vs last quarter

+13.6%

Net profit

₹25 Cr

Profit vs last quarter

+176.8%

Net margin

28.3%

EPS

₹2.67

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹977 Cr
Prev close
₹108.57
52w High
₹141
52w Low
₹64.9
Enterprise value
₹1,068 Cr
Beta
1.6
Price CAGR 1y
-7.0%
Price CAGR 3y
-14.0%
Price CAGR 5y
4.0%
Price CAGR 10y
7.0%

Ratios

Return on assets
0.2%
PEG ratio
-9.8
P/E ratio
—
P/B ratio
2.5
EV / EBITDA
—
Industry P/E
37.6
ROCE
2.7%
ROCE 5y average
15.4%
ROE
0.5%
Debt / Equity
0.3
Interest coverage
1.2
Dividend yield
0.5%
ROE 3y average
6.0%
ROE last year
0.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹342 Cr
Annual profit
₹1 Cr
Operating margin
0.1%
Net profit margin
0.3%
EBITDA margin
0.0%
Sales growth 3y
-1.1%
Sales growth 5y
8.2%
Profit growth 3y
-69.0%
Profit growth 5y
-46.0%
EPS
₹0.1
Sales growth TTM
-13.0%
Profit growth TTM
-321.0%
Dividend payout
404.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹87 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹25 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
-10.9%
YoY quarterly profit growth
—
OPM latest quarter
-60.3%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹44.2
Face Value
₹1.0
Total debt
₹100 Cr
Total cash
₹9 Cr
Borrowings
₹100 Cr
Reserves / Equity
43.2

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
-₹3 Cr
Free cash flow
-₹8 Cr
FCF yield
-1.9%
Net cash flow
-₹2 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
67.1%
FII holding
0.0%
DII holding
0.0%
Public holding
32.9%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
Sun Pharma.Inds.1,751.8533.24,20,3280.902,901.26.015,299.910.520.5
Divi's Lab.9,395.9583.72,49,4330.31902.065.53,080.027.822.0
Torrent Pharma.4,613.7078.71,75,4900.81566.05.84,921.054.915.2
Zydus Lifesci.1,117.0022.91,11,4210.09990.2-35.18,017.022.021.1
Laurus Labs2,011.7099.41,08,6950.10362.1125.52,026.329.117.8
Cipla1,296.0029.31,04,7000.98785.6-39.27,119.32.315.5
Dr Reddy's Labs1,178.2030.598,3420.67435.6-68.78,099.8-5.513.0
Themis Medicare108.409980.4524.6-282.387.0-10.92.7
Median415.9034.12,1210.0713.529.5164.018.415.0

Competes with: Aurobindo Pharma, Cipla, Divi's Laboratories, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Laurus Labs Limited, Lupin, Mankind Pharma Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical, Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Zydus Lifesciences

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales97105839812311794729878907787
Expenses75927489941008879108818073139
Material Cost16141418
Change in Inventories-103.05-1.98-9.46
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade18121150
Employee Cost25232122
Other Expenses32282859
Operating Profit22128929176-8-10-3104-52
OPM %22129.769.5024156.36-11-10-3.97114.91-60
Other Income676576121561197
Exceptional items (within Other Income)0-0.87093
Interest2232223223333
Depreciation3333223333333
Profit before tax23148931182-11-14-310939
Tax %19191024212069-13153236
Net Profit18117725141-10-14-410925
EPS in Rs1.981.230.800.722.681.550.06-1.05-1.54-0.391.100.972.67
Diluted EPS in Rs-0.391.090.962.67

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales202232217210184202231395354382406342332
Expenses184194184184181166181299287330356342374
Material Cost57
Change in Inventories9.17
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade63
Employee Cost94
Other Expenses119
Operating Profit1838332523649966752490-42
OPM %91615121.201821241913120.10-13
Other Income13346512131825241123118
Exceptional items (within Other Income)-0.87
Interest151212121213139109101111
Depreciation111277889910129.931010
Profit before tax5171811-13274195735340255
Tax %-201191-158142322192540
Net Profit6161611-11253673574430140
EPS in Rs0.731.911.771.23-1.172.703.887.926.184.733.240.124.35
Diluted EPS in Rs0.12
Dividend Payout %259000611681115404

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
4%
5 years
8%
3 years
-1%
TTM
-13%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
-20%
5 years
-46%
3 years
-69%
TTM
-321%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
7%
5 years
4%
3 years
-14%
1 year
-7%

Return on equity

10 years
11%
5 years
12%
3 years
6%
Last year
0%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital8999999999.209.209
Reserves5166143160149174209278330368393389
Borrowings1401288280821008780929683100
Other Liabilities7773545674676561829310299
Minority Interest-0.00
Total Liabilities277275289305314350371428514566588598
Fixed Assets122117124126123116133144162168172167
CWIP469228233332
Investments56232427354556708995109
Other Assets146146133153162191191225279307318320
Total Assets277275289305314350371428514566588598

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity1926-281105734162235-3
Cash from Investing Activity-6-7-4-0-4-5-16-16-24-16-12-3
Cash from Financing Activity-18-135-9-107-26-180-9-264
Net Cash Flow-55-0-1-32161-8-3-3-2
Free Cash Flow1318-755-53915-13421-8

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days82758112014518612393149170159190
Inventory Days246243250253287315272150213188233229
Days Payable23714516315618717114379123126142143
Cash Conversion Cycle91172168216244330251164239232250275
Working Capital Days-20-17-1619-1375172110114121138
ROCE %9151310-11518302014103

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters676767676767676767676767
FIIs0.050.010.030.050.100.100.140.090.060.050.110.01
DIIs0.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.010.01
Public333333333333333333333333
No. of Shareholders6,97011,24411,29511,32214,27017,77317,88919,33522,49022,57621,81821,267

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year -17.0% (₹130.81 → ₹108.57)Brick size ₹6.16 (fixed)Bricks 23
₹80.00₹100₹120₹109Nov '25Mar '26Jun '26Sep '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹108.57 on 9 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

91.00inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-03-31

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)

25,53,996inr

2026-03-31

News

News and filings about Themis Medicare Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

Uses as raw material

  • Active pharmaceutical ingredients (outsourced) for formulations
  • Fermentation media (glucose, starch, corn steep liquor, soybean/peanut meal) for Simvastatin/Lovastatin API
  • Organic solvents (acetone, ethanol, methanol) for API purification/extraction
  • Pharmaceutical excipients (MCC, lactose, HPMC, talc) for formulations

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Healthcare
Industry
Pharmaceuticals
Classification
Healthcare › Pharmaceuticals
ISIN
INE083B01024

Plants

  • Themis Medicare Haridwar Formulations Plant
  • Themis Medicare Hyderabad API Plant (Artemis Biotech)

News impact

Big market events that reach Themis Medicare Limited, and how the effect spreads.

Who it hits first

  • Fortis Healthcare, the hospital chain, faces a court-ordered forensic audit, meaning outside accountants will dig through its books while investors price in governance risk.
  • InGovern, the governance adviser, warns the order could let lenders chase listed companies for their promoters' (founding owners') personal debts, blurring the line between a company and its owners.
  • Hospital shares with heavy promoter pledging (founders' shares posted as loan collateral), like Aster DM at 40.66% pledged and Cohance at 94.56% pledged, face the sharpest sentiment hit.
  • Stronger hospital operators such as Apollo and Max, with solid returns and low pledges, face only a mild sector-wide discount rather than a direct hit.

Who may gain

  • Rival hospital chains like Apollo Hospitals and Max Healthcare could pick up a few patients if Fortis managers are distracted by the audit, though the pack shows no booking shift yet.
  • Governance advisers and law firms that run forensic audits and promoter-debt opinions may win fresh mandates from cautious boards.
  • Low-pledge, high-return drug makers may look relatively safer as cautious investors rotate away from pledged names.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Fortis sells care directly to patients rather than to companies (the pack lists no downstream customers), so there is no buyer order chain to disrupt — the hit lands on patient confidence and the share price, not on a customer.

Upstream

NephroPlus, the dialysis operator named as a Fortis supplier, plus Interarch, the building-products supplier, face no direct order cut since a book audit cancels no dialysis sessions or hospital buildings, though a long probe could slow Fortis expansion orders.

Where demand moves

Business

Hospital visits and planned surgeries at Fortis could soften if patients and referring doctors turn cautious during the audit, with a small spillover of footfall to nearby Apollo, Max and Aster hospitals; drug and lab-equipment orders show no direct change since the order targets books, not prescriptions.

Capital

Investors are likely to trim Fortis and high-pledge healthcare names and rotate toward low-pledge, high-return peers or cash, widening the gap between PE 63.48 Fortis and names nearer sector median 44.03.

How it spreads across sectors

Financial Services

Lenders and NBFCs (shadow banks) watch whether courts let them reach listed-company assets for promoter loans, which could reshape collateral terms over months.

Healthcare

Hospital stocks trade with a wider governance discount, sharpest for high-pledge names, while drug makers with no hospital link barely move.

When it plays out

Immediate

Fortis shares wobble on audit headlines and governance commentary while high-pledge peers slip in sympathy.

Medium term

Audit findings decide the path — a clean report unwinds the discount, while adverse findings or an upheld precedent invite fresh risk talk.

Short term

Lawyers parse the court order's scope; any clarification limiting the precedent calms peers, while talk of wider enforcement keeps pledged names soft.

Who it hits first

  • Launch-heavy drug makers (Sun, Cipla) gain months of extra sales per approval.
  • API suppliers and CDMOs see more client molecules to make.
  • Hospitals unaffected — approvals do not fill beds.

Who may gain

  • Sun Pharma most in absolute terms; quality API makers (Gujarat Themis) on volumes.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Distributors and pharmacies stock more new products; hospitals mostly unaffected.

Upstream

API and intermediate makers gain volumes as more launches need ingredients.

Where demand moves

Business

Approval queues shorten; API/CDMO order books lengthen; patients access drugs sooner.

Capital

Money rotates into launch-heavy pharma and quality API names; avoids weak-balance-sheet theme traps.

How it spreads across sectors

Healthcare

Pharma and CDMO positive with a lag; hospitals neutral; weak names are value traps.

When it plays out

Immediate

Pharma stocks firm 1-3% on sentiment; weak names jump most (sell the jump).

Medium term

Actual approval acceleration over 1-3 years compounds launch-heavy winners.

Short term

Draft details and implementation dates decide how much is real vs hope.

Who it hits first

  • Piramal Pharma faces CDMO order pauses, deeper client audits and remediation costs at Morpeth.
  • Seven observations exceed its own 4-observation precedents, signaling a tougher inspection outcome.
  • Small pharma peers derate on sentiment as investors re-check Indian plant quality systems.

Who may gain

  • Large quality leaders (Sun, Divi) may pick up marginal CDMO inquiries — too small to trade.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

US clients of Morpeth qualify backup suppliers slowly; no drug shortages indicated.

Upstream

No direct supply-chain link — this is a plant-quality event, not a supply disruption; API suppliers to Morpeth see minor order delays.

Where demand moves

Business

CDMO clients slow new Piramal orders and audit harder; no demand transfers at scale to peers.

Capital

Money trims small-pharma exposure on regulatory headlines; rotates to large quality pharma and hospitals-on-facts.

How it spreads across sectors

Healthcare

CDMO/API sentiment hit; hospitals untouched operationally; large pharma flat per precedent.

When it plays out

Immediate

Piramal stock down 2-5% on the headline; small peers dip 1-3% on sentiment.

Medium term

Clean re-inspection closes the episode; warning letter or import alert would extend damage to quarters.

Short term

Company corrective-action response and FDA classification (VAI vs OAI) decide whether this fades or escalates.

Who it hits first

  • AbbVie (ABBV) and Apogee Therapeutics are US-listed; neither is in the Indian knowledge graph — zero direct impact on Indian listed companies.

Who may gain

  • Sentiment-level read-across to Indian biologics/biosimilar innovators (immunology-biologics theme stays in focus) and, as a diffuse long-term theme, the CDMO/CRO category as global pharma deploys M&A capital.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

No downstream supply-chain link — a US biotech acquisition does not change product flows to or from any Indian listed company.

Upstream

No upstream supply-chain link — AbbVie and Apogee are US entities; no Indian listed company supplies APIs, intermediates or services into this specific transaction.

Where demand moves

Business

No direct business-demand flow — the AbbVie-Apogee deal neither creates nor destroys orders for any Indian company. Any effect (global pharma capital deployment lifting long-term outsourcing demand for Indian CDMO/CRO players) is a diffuse second-order theme, not a measurable order shift.

Capital

Capital-flow read-across only — a global immunology M&A reinforces a positive innovator-pharma narrative that can support Indian pharma valuations at the margin; the effect is sentiment-level and strongest for biologics/biosimilar names such as Biocon.

How it spreads across sectors

Healthcare

negligible — hospital operators have no business channel to a US drug-developer acquisition

Pharma

mild positive sentiment from the global pharma M&A consolidation/innovation theme

Who it hits first

  • Health-IT / digital-health software vendors and system integrators that build the registries, citizen apps and interoperability layers (TATAELXSI, NETWEB, PROTEAN) see anticipatory demand
  • National drug registry adds batch-level traceability/serialization compliance obligations for pharma makers (e.g. THEMISMED)

Who may gain

  • TATAELXSI - healthcare digital-engineering vertical
  • NETWEB - HPC / data-centre / AI-server backbone for registries and analytics
  • PROTEAN - builder/operator of govt digital public infrastructure (closest fit to the health stack)

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream, hospitals and diagnostics chains (HCG) must integrate interoperable records (near-term integration cost, gradual efficiency benefit) and pharma manufacturers/distributors (THEMISMED) must adapt dispensing, serialization and recall workflows to the national drug registry.

Upstream

Registry/app build-out pulls demand to upstream compute and connectivity suppliers - HPC servers and data-centre hardware (NETWEB) and last-mile/rural connectivity (NELCO) - plus cybersecurity and cloud-hosting vendors that secure sensitive health data.

Where demand moves

Business

Govt digital-health platform build-out creates new orders for health-IT software vendors, system integrators and digital-public-infrastructure operators (TATAELXSI, PROTEAN), and for the compute/data-centre backbone (NETWEB); pharma makers face new drug-registry compliance/serialization spend that flows to packaging, track-and-trace and pharma-IT vendors.

Capital

Anticipatory, theme-driven buying rotates toward listed health-IT and digital-public-infrastructure proxies (TATAELXSI, NETWEB, PROTEAN) on the launch news; given rich valuations and no awarded tenders, flows are likely shallow and selective rather than a broad sector re-rating.

How it spreads across sectors

Healthcare

Hospitals and diagnostics adopt interoperable records; near-term integration cost, gradual efficiency benefit (mixed)

Information Technology

Demand for govt health-IT build-out, system integration and digital-public-infrastructure platforms (positive, anticipatory)

Pharma

Drug registry drives serialization/traceability compliance spend; near-term cost, medium-term formalization (mixed)

codex additions

When it plays out

Immediate

June 29 launch generates theme-driven, anticipatory interest in listed health-IT / digital-public-infrastructure proxies; little fundamental change until tenders/contracts are awarded

Medium term

If the digital-health stack scales (registries, interoperability, AI workloads), structural demand builds for health-IT, data-centre/compute, cybersecurity and track-and-trace vendors; formalization may modestly favour organized pharma

Short term

Watch for actual procurement, tenders and system-integrator awards (incl. govt cloud/NIC routing) that would convert the theme into revenue; pharma begins assessing drug-registry compliance load

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Interoperable health records and registries can reduce claims friction, improve underwriting data, enable faster pre-authorisation and fraud checks; insurers may need integration spend but benefit from cleaner digital rails over time.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["STARHEALTH","ICICIGI","NIACL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Near-term compliance/integration cost; medium-term operating efficiency and product-design upside.","sector":"Health Insurance / Insurtech","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Citizen apps, telemedicine, provider registries and rural digital-health access increase dependence on reliable mobile data, broadband, enterprise connectivity and last-mile uptime.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","TATACOMM","INDUSTOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most visible where public-health workflows extend into rural clinics, pharmacies and district hospitals.","sector":"Telecom Connectivity / Broadband Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"National registries, health IDs, consent systems, analytics and AI workloads require secure hosting, storage, uptime, cooling and backup-power infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","BLUESTARCO","CUMMINSIND"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Indirect capex beneficiary; demand may route through cloud/data-centre operators and government system integrators.","sector":"Data Centres, Power Backup and Cooling","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Large-scale health records and drug registries raise privacy, identity, consent-management and cyber-risk requirements, creating demand for endpoint security, audits, encryption and incident-response services.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUICKHEAL","TAC","63MOONS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Health data sensitivity makes security spend politically and operationally hard to defer.","sector":"Cybersecurity / Digital Trust","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"A national drug registry can push manufacturers and distributors toward better batch-level traceability, QR/barcode labelling, anti-counterfeit packaging and serialization workflows.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","EPL","TCPLPACK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how mandatory and granular registry compliance becomes.","sector":"Packaging, Labelling and Track-and-Trace","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Drug registry integration can change inventory verification, recall management, substitution checks and dispensing workflows for wholesalers, chains and online pharmacies.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["MEDPLUS","APOLLOHOSP","ENTERO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Compliance burden initially negative; larger organised players may gain share from better ability to integrate.","sector":"Pharma Distribution / Retail Pharmacy","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Better drug traceability and digital inventory records can increase formal logistics requirements, especially for temperature-sensitive medicines, vaccines and recall-ready supply chains.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant if registry rules extend into distribution-chain reporting and batch-level movement tracking.","sector":"Logistics and Cold Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Provider-focused digital solutions and interoperable records increase demand for connected devices, hospital IT-linked equipment, patient monitoring systems and digitised clinical workflows.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["POLYMED","BPL","KRSNAA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect beneficiary through hospitals upgrading devices and workflow capture around digital records.","sector":"Medical Devices and Hospital Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Citizen health apps, digital claims, teleconsultations, pharmacy purchases and public-health benefit flows can increase embedded payment, reconciliation and identity-linked transaction use cases.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["PAYTM","NSDL","CAMS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely second-order; strongest if government health apps include payments, reimbursements or benefit-transfer layers.","sector":"Digital Payments / Fintech Rails","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

23 Sep 2026unspecified₹0.5
4 Sep 2025unspecified₹0.5
12 Jul 2024unspecified₹0.5
10 Oct 2023split₹0
1 Sep 2023unspecified₹5
8 Sep 2022unspecified₹5
8 Sep 2021unspecified₹4.3
17 Sep 2020unspecified₹1.75

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.