Themis Medicare Limited
NSE: THEMISMEDPharmaceuticals
Share price
₹108.57
-0.13% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
29
out of 100 · worked out 9 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹977 Cr
P/E ratio
—
P/B ratio
2.5
ROCE
2.7%
ROE
0.5%
Dividend yield
0.5%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales fell 12.8% over the past year. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 19.9% to -12.1% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 4.4% a year against a sector median of 13.1% — 8.7 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
It has no earnings, so there is no price-to-earnings to compare.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
It has no earnings to weigh the price against.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Themis Medicare Limited — this one | -69%/yr | — | — |
| Dr Reddy's Laboratories | -4%/yr | 31.2× | — |
| Mankind Pharma Limited | 17%/yr | 45.5× | ₹2.7 |
| Aurobindo Pharma | 23%/yr | 26.0× | ₹1.1 |
| Lupin | 140%/yr | 14.9× | — |
| Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited | 61%/yr | 20.6× | ₹0.34 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Pharmaceuticals), it ranks 112 of 130 on returns, 106 of 127 on growth, 120 of 130 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 2.7% on capital, ahead of 14% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹104 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹85 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹49 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 73 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 72 days for its cash to waiting 138 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
6 of 10 checks clear · 60%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Announced 13 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹87 Cr
Revenue vs last year
-10.9%
Revenue vs last quarter
+13.6%
Net profit
₹25 Cr
Profit vs last quarter
+176.8%
Net margin
28.3%
EPS
₹2.67
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹977 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹108.57
- 52w High
- ₹141
- 52w Low
- ₹64.9
- Enterprise value
- ₹1,068 Cr
- Beta
- 1.6
- Price CAGR 1y
- -7.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- -14.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 4.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 7.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 0.2%
- PEG ratio
- -9.8
- P/E ratio
- —
- P/B ratio
- 2.5
- EV / EBITDA
- —
- Industry P/E
- 37.6
- ROCE
- 2.7%
- ROCE 5y average
- 15.4%
- ROE
- 0.5%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.3
- Interest coverage
- 1.2
- Dividend yield
- 0.5%
- ROE 3y average
- 6.0%
- ROE last year
- 0.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹342 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹1 Cr
- Operating margin
- 0.1%
- Net profit margin
- 0.3%
- EBITDA margin
- 0.0%
- Sales growth 3y
- -1.1%
- Sales growth 5y
- 8.2%
- Profit growth 3y
- -69.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- -46.0%
- EPS
- ₹0.1
- Sales growth TTM
- -13.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -321.0%
- Dividend payout
- 404.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹87 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹25 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- -10.9%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- —
- OPM latest quarter
- -60.3%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹44.2
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹100 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹9 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹100 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 43.2
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- -₹3 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹8 Cr
- FCF yield
- -1.9%
- Net cash flow
- -₹2 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 67.1%
- FII holding
- 0.0%
- DII holding
- 0.0%
- Public holding
- 32.9%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun Pharma.Inds. | 1,751.85 | 33.2 | 4,20,328 | 0.90 | 2,901.2 | 6.0 | 15,299.9 | 10.5 | 20.5 |
| Divi's Lab. | 9,395.95 | 83.7 | 2,49,433 | 0.31 | 902.0 | 65.5 | 3,080.0 | 27.8 | 22.0 |
| Torrent Pharma. | 4,613.70 | 78.7 | 1,75,490 | 0.81 | 566.0 | 5.8 | 4,921.0 | 54.9 | 15.2 |
| Zydus Lifesci. | 1,117.00 | 22.9 | 1,11,421 | 0.09 | 990.2 | -35.1 | 8,017.0 | 22.0 | 21.1 |
| Laurus Labs | 2,011.70 | 99.4 | 1,08,695 | 0.10 | 362.1 | 125.5 | 2,026.3 | 29.1 | 17.8 |
| Cipla | 1,296.00 | 29.3 | 1,04,700 | 0.98 | 785.6 | -39.2 | 7,119.3 | 2.3 | 15.5 |
| Dr Reddy's Labs | 1,178.20 | 30.5 | 98,342 | 0.67 | 435.6 | -68.7 | 8,099.8 | -5.5 | 13.0 |
| Themis Medicare | 108.40 | 998 | 0.45 | 24.6 | -282.3 | 87.0 | -10.9 | 2.7 | |
| Median | 415.90 | 34.1 | 2,121 | 0.07 | 13.5 | 29.5 | 164.0 | 18.4 | 15.0 |
Competes with: Aurobindo Pharma, Cipla, Divi's Laboratories, Dr Reddy's Laboratories, Laurus Labs Limited, Lupin, Mankind Pharma Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical, Torrent Pharmaceuticals, Zydus Lifesciences
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 97 | 105 | 83 | 98 | 123 | 117 | 94 | 72 | 98 | 78 | 90 | 77 | 87 |
| Expenses | 75 | 92 | 74 | 89 | 94 | 100 | 88 | 79 | 108 | 81 | 80 | 73 | 139 |
| Material Cost | 16 | 14 | 14 | 18 | |||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -10 | 3.05 | -1.98 | -9.46 | |||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 18 | 12 | 11 | 50 | |||||||||
| Employee Cost | 25 | 23 | 21 | 22 | |||||||||
| Other Expenses | 32 | 28 | 28 | 59 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 22 | 12 | 8 | 9 | 29 | 17 | 6 | -8 | -10 | -3 | 10 | 4 | -52 |
| OPM % | 22 | 12 | 9.76 | 9.50 | 24 | 15 | 6.36 | -11 | -10 | -3.97 | 11 | 4.91 | -60 |
| Other Income | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 97 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -0.87 | 0 | 93 | |||||||||
| Interest | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Depreciation | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Profit before tax | 23 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 31 | 18 | 2 | -11 | -14 | -3 | 10 | 9 | 39 |
| Tax % | 19 | 19 | 10 | 24 | 21 | 20 | 69 | -13 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 36 |
| Net Profit | 18 | 11 | 7 | 7 | 25 | 14 | 1 | -10 | -14 | -4 | 10 | 9 | 25 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.98 | 1.23 | 0.80 | 0.72 | 2.68 | 1.55 | 0.06 | -1.05 | -1.54 | -0.39 | 1.10 | 0.97 | 2.67 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -0.39 | 1.09 | 0.96 | 2.67 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 202 | 232 | 217 | 210 | 184 | 202 | 231 | 395 | 354 | 382 | 406 | 342 | 332 |
| Expenses | 184 | 194 | 184 | 184 | 181 | 166 | 181 | 299 | 287 | 330 | 356 | 342 | 374 |
| Material Cost | 57 | ||||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 9.17 | ||||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 63 | ||||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 94 | ||||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 119 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 18 | 38 | 33 | 25 | 2 | 36 | 49 | 96 | 67 | 52 | 49 | 0 | -42 |
| OPM % | 9 | 16 | 15 | 12 | 1.20 | 18 | 21 | 24 | 19 | 13 | 12 | 0.10 | -13 |
| Other Income | 13 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 25 | 24 | 11 | 23 | 118 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | -0.87 | ||||||||||||
| Interest | 15 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 13 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| Depreciation | 11 | 12 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 12 | 9.93 | 10 | 10 |
| Profit before tax | 5 | 17 | 18 | 11 | -13 | 27 | 41 | 95 | 73 | 53 | 40 | 2 | 55 |
| Tax % | -20 | 11 | 9 | 1 | -15 | 8 | 14 | 23 | 22 | 19 | 25 | 40 | |
| Net Profit | 6 | 16 | 16 | 11 | -11 | 25 | 36 | 73 | 57 | 44 | 30 | 1 | 40 |
| EPS in Rs | 0.73 | 1.91 | 1.77 | 1.23 | -1.17 | 2.70 | 3.88 | 7.92 | 6.18 | 4.73 | 3.24 | 0.12 | 4.35 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.12 | ||||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 25 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 404 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 4%
- 5 years
- 8%
- 3 years
- -1%
- TTM
- -13%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- -20%
- 5 years
- -46%
- 3 years
- -69%
- TTM
- -321%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 7%
- 5 years
- 4%
- 3 years
- -14%
- 1 year
- -7%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 11%
- 5 years
- 12%
- 3 years
- 6%
- Last year
- 0%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9.20 | 9.20 | 9 |
| Reserves | 51 | 66 | 143 | 160 | 149 | 174 | 209 | 278 | 330 | 368 | 393 | 389 |
| Borrowings | 140 | 128 | 82 | 80 | 82 | 100 | 87 | 80 | 92 | 96 | 83 | 100 |
| Other Liabilities | 77 | 73 | 54 | 56 | 74 | 67 | 65 | 61 | 82 | 93 | 102 | 99 |
| Minority Interest | -0.00 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 277 | 275 | 289 | 305 | 314 | 350 | 371 | 428 | 514 | 566 | 588 | 598 |
| Fixed Assets | 122 | 117 | 124 | 126 | 123 | 116 | 133 | 144 | 162 | 168 | 172 | 167 |
| CWIP | 4 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Investments | 5 | 6 | 23 | 24 | 27 | 35 | 45 | 56 | 70 | 89 | 95 | 109 |
| Other Assets | 146 | 146 | 133 | 153 | 162 | 191 | 191 | 225 | 279 | 307 | 318 | 320 |
| Total Assets | 277 | 275 | 289 | 305 | 314 | 350 | 371 | 428 | 514 | 566 | 588 | 598 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 19 | 26 | -2 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 57 | 34 | 16 | 22 | 35 | -3 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -6 | -7 | -4 | -0 | -4 | -5 | -16 | -16 | -24 | -16 | -12 | -3 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -18 | -13 | 5 | -9 | -10 | 7 | -26 | -18 | 0 | -9 | -26 | 4 |
| Net Cash Flow | -5 | 5 | -0 | -1 | -3 | 2 | 16 | 1 | -8 | -3 | -3 | -2 |
| Free Cash Flow | 13 | 18 | -7 | 5 | 5 | -5 | 39 | 15 | -13 | 4 | 21 | -8 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 82 | 75 | 81 | 120 | 145 | 186 | 123 | 93 | 149 | 170 | 159 | 190 |
| Inventory Days | 246 | 243 | 250 | 253 | 287 | 315 | 272 | 150 | 213 | 188 | 233 | 229 |
| Days Payable | 237 | 145 | 163 | 156 | 187 | 171 | 143 | 79 | 123 | 126 | 142 | 143 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 91 | 172 | 168 | 216 | 244 | 330 | 251 | 164 | 239 | 232 | 250 | 275 |
| Working Capital Days | -20 | -17 | -16 | 19 | -1 | 37 | 51 | 72 | 110 | 114 | 121 | 138 |
| ROCE % | 9 | 15 | 13 | 10 | -1 | 15 | 18 | 30 | 20 | 14 | 10 | 3 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
91.00inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
25,53,996inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Themis Medicare Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
8 Sept, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in Themis Medicare Limited.
7 Sept, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in Themis Medicare Limited.
13 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · medium impact
Themis Medicare Limited — Resignation of Mr. Nagraj Mogaveera as Company Secretary & Compliance Officer of the company w.e.f. August 13, 2026.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Active pharmaceutical ingredients (outsourced) for formulations
- Fermentation media (glucose, starch, corn steep liquor, soybean/peanut meal) for Simvastatin/Lovastatin API
- Organic solvents (acetone, ethanol, methanol) for API purification/extraction
- Pharmaceutical excipients (MCC, lactose, HPMC, talc) for formulations
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Industry
- Pharmaceuticals
- Classification
- Healthcare › Pharmaceuticals
- ISIN
- INE083B01024
Plants
- Themis Medicare Haridwar Formulations Plant
- Themis Medicare Hyderabad API Plant (Artemis Biotech)
News impact
Big market events that reach Themis Medicare Limited, and how the effect spreads.
22 Sept, 19:57 IST · Market event · medium impact
Fortis audit order could drag listed firms into promoters' personal debt cases: InGovern
Delhi court ordered a forensic audit of hospital chain Fortis, spooking investors about promoter-debt risk in high-pledge healthcare stocks while rival hospitals see only mixed fallout.
Who it hits first
- Fortis Healthcare, the hospital chain, faces a court-ordered forensic audit, meaning outside accountants will dig through its books while investors price in governance risk.
- InGovern, the governance adviser, warns the order could let lenders chase listed companies for their promoters' (founding owners') personal debts, blurring the line between a company and its owners.
- Hospital shares with heavy promoter pledging (founders' shares posted as loan collateral), like Aster DM at 40.66% pledged and Cohance at 94.56% pledged, face the sharpest sentiment hit.
- Stronger hospital operators such as Apollo and Max, with solid returns and low pledges, face only a mild sector-wide discount rather than a direct hit.
Who may gain
- Rival hospital chains like Apollo Hospitals and Max Healthcare could pick up a few patients if Fortis managers are distracted by the audit, though the pack shows no booking shift yet.
- Governance advisers and law firms that run forensic audits and promoter-debt opinions may win fresh mandates from cautious boards.
- Low-pledge, high-return drug makers may look relatively safer as cautious investors rotate away from pledged names.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Fortis sells care directly to patients rather than to companies (the pack lists no downstream customers), so there is no buyer order chain to disrupt — the hit lands on patient confidence and the share price, not on a customer.
Upstream
NephroPlus, the dialysis operator named as a Fortis supplier, plus Interarch, the building-products supplier, face no direct order cut since a book audit cancels no dialysis sessions or hospital buildings, though a long probe could slow Fortis expansion orders.
Where demand moves
Business
Hospital visits and planned surgeries at Fortis could soften if patients and referring doctors turn cautious during the audit, with a small spillover of footfall to nearby Apollo, Max and Aster hospitals; drug and lab-equipment orders show no direct change since the order targets books, not prescriptions.
Capital
Investors are likely to trim Fortis and high-pledge healthcare names and rotate toward low-pledge, high-return peers or cash, widening the gap between PE 63.48 Fortis and names nearer sector median 44.03.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Lenders and NBFCs (shadow banks) watch whether courts let them reach listed-company assets for promoter loans, which could reshape collateral terms over months.
Healthcare
Hospital stocks trade with a wider governance discount, sharpest for high-pledge names, while drug makers with no hospital link barely move.
When it plays out
Immediate
Fortis shares wobble on audit headlines and governance commentary while high-pledge peers slip in sympathy.
Medium term
Audit findings decide the path — a clean report unwinds the discount, while adverse findings or an upheld precedent invite fresh risk talk.
Short term
Lawyers parse the court order's scope; any clarification limiting the precedent calms peers, while talk of wider enforcement keeps pledged names soft.
15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · medium impact
New norms for faster drug rollout proposed; industry hails move
India plans to approve new medicines faster — good for drug makers like Sun Pharma that launch the most products.
Who it hits first
- Launch-heavy drug makers (Sun, Cipla) gain months of extra sales per approval.
- API suppliers and CDMOs see more client molecules to make.
- Hospitals unaffected — approvals do not fill beds.
Who may gain
- Sun Pharma most in absolute terms; quality API makers (Gujarat Themis) on volumes.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Distributors and pharmacies stock more new products; hospitals mostly unaffected.
Upstream
API and intermediate makers gain volumes as more launches need ingredients.
Where demand moves
Business
Approval queues shorten; API/CDMO order books lengthen; patients access drugs sooner.
Capital
Money rotates into launch-heavy pharma and quality API names; avoids weak-balance-sheet theme traps.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
Pharma and CDMO positive with a lag; hospitals neutral; weak names are value traps.
When it plays out
Immediate
Pharma stocks firm 1-3% on sentiment; weak names jump most (sell the jump).
Medium term
Actual approval acceleration over 1-3 years compounds launch-heavy winners.
Short term
Draft details and implementation dates decide how much is real vs hope.
15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · high impact
Piramal Pharma Morpeth UK facility gets 7 FDA observations after Sep 3-11 inspection
A US drug watchdog found seven problems at Piramal Pharma UK factory — bad for its shares, while rival drug makers should barely feel it.
Who it hits first
- Piramal Pharma faces CDMO order pauses, deeper client audits and remediation costs at Morpeth.
- Seven observations exceed its own 4-observation precedents, signaling a tougher inspection outcome.
- Small pharma peers derate on sentiment as investors re-check Indian plant quality systems.
Who may gain
- Large quality leaders (Sun, Divi) may pick up marginal CDMO inquiries — too small to trade.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US clients of Morpeth qualify backup suppliers slowly; no drug shortages indicated.
Upstream
No direct supply-chain link — this is a plant-quality event, not a supply disruption; API suppliers to Morpeth see minor order delays.
Where demand moves
Business
CDMO clients slow new Piramal orders and audit harder; no demand transfers at scale to peers.
Capital
Money trims small-pharma exposure on regulatory headlines; rotates to large quality pharma and hospitals-on-facts.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
CDMO/API sentiment hit; hospitals untouched operationally; large pharma flat per precedent.
When it plays out
Immediate
Piramal stock down 2-5% on the headline; small peers dip 1-3% on sentiment.
Medium term
Clean re-inspection closes the episode; warning letter or import alert would extend damage to quarters.
Short term
Company corrective-action response and FDA classification (VAI vs OAI) decide whether this fades or escalates.
28 Jun, 02:05 IST · Market event · medium impact
AbbVie (ABBV) to Acquire Apogee Therapeutics
Who it hits first
- AbbVie (ABBV) and Apogee Therapeutics are US-listed; neither is in the Indian knowledge graph — zero direct impact on Indian listed companies.
Who may gain
- Sentiment-level read-across to Indian biologics/biosimilar innovators (immunology-biologics theme stays in focus) and, as a diffuse long-term theme, the CDMO/CRO category as global pharma deploys M&A capital.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
No downstream supply-chain link — a US biotech acquisition does not change product flows to or from any Indian listed company.
Upstream
No upstream supply-chain link — AbbVie and Apogee are US entities; no Indian listed company supplies APIs, intermediates or services into this specific transaction.
Where demand moves
Business
No direct business-demand flow — the AbbVie-Apogee deal neither creates nor destroys orders for any Indian company. Any effect (global pharma capital deployment lifting long-term outsourcing demand for Indian CDMO/CRO players) is a diffuse second-order theme, not a measurable order shift.
Capital
Capital-flow read-across only — a global immunology M&A reinforces a positive innovator-pharma narrative that can support Indian pharma valuations at the margin; the effect is sentiment-level and strongest for biologics/biosimilar names such as Biocon.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
negligible — hospital operators have no business channel to a US drug-developer acquisition
Pharma
mild positive sentiment from the global pharma M&A consolidation/innovation theme
27 Jun, 18:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
Aarogya Setu 2.0 to drug registry: Govt to launch various digital healthcare initiatives on June 29
Who it hits first
- Health-IT / digital-health software vendors and system integrators that build the registries, citizen apps and interoperability layers (TATAELXSI, NETWEB, PROTEAN) see anticipatory demand
- National drug registry adds batch-level traceability/serialization compliance obligations for pharma makers (e.g. THEMISMED)
Who may gain
- TATAELXSI - healthcare digital-engineering vertical
- NETWEB - HPC / data-centre / AI-server backbone for registries and analytics
- PROTEAN - builder/operator of govt digital public infrastructure (closest fit to the health stack)
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, hospitals and diagnostics chains (HCG) must integrate interoperable records (near-term integration cost, gradual efficiency benefit) and pharma manufacturers/distributors (THEMISMED) must adapt dispensing, serialization and recall workflows to the national drug registry.
Upstream
Registry/app build-out pulls demand to upstream compute and connectivity suppliers - HPC servers and data-centre hardware (NETWEB) and last-mile/rural connectivity (NELCO) - plus cybersecurity and cloud-hosting vendors that secure sensitive health data.
Where demand moves
Business
Govt digital-health platform build-out creates new orders for health-IT software vendors, system integrators and digital-public-infrastructure operators (TATAELXSI, PROTEAN), and for the compute/data-centre backbone (NETWEB); pharma makers face new drug-registry compliance/serialization spend that flows to packaging, track-and-trace and pharma-IT vendors.
Capital
Anticipatory, theme-driven buying rotates toward listed health-IT and digital-public-infrastructure proxies (TATAELXSI, NETWEB, PROTEAN) on the launch news; given rich valuations and no awarded tenders, flows are likely shallow and selective rather than a broad sector re-rating.
How it spreads across sectors
Healthcare
Hospitals and diagnostics adopt interoperable records; near-term integration cost, gradual efficiency benefit (mixed)
Information Technology
Demand for govt health-IT build-out, system integration and digital-public-infrastructure platforms (positive, anticipatory)
Pharma
Drug registry drives serialization/traceability compliance spend; near-term cost, medium-term formalization (mixed)
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
June 29 launch generates theme-driven, anticipatory interest in listed health-IT / digital-public-infrastructure proxies; little fundamental change until tenders/contracts are awarded
Medium term
If the digital-health stack scales (registries, interoperability, AI workloads), structural demand builds for health-IT, data-centre/compute, cybersecurity and track-and-trace vendors; formalization may modestly favour organized pharma
Short term
Watch for actual procurement, tenders and system-integrator awards (incl. govt cloud/NIC routing) that would convert the theme into revenue; pharma begins assessing drug-registry compliance load
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Interoperable health records and registries can reduce claims friction, improve underwriting data, enable faster pre-authorisation and fraud checks; insurers may need integration spend but benefit from cleaner digital rails over time.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["STARHEALTH","ICICIGI","NIACL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Near-term compliance/integration cost; medium-term operating efficiency and product-design upside.","sector":"Health Insurance / Insurtech","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Citizen apps, telemedicine, provider registries and rural digital-health access increase dependence on reliable mobile data, broadband, enterprise connectivity and last-mile uptime.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","TATACOMM","INDUSTOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most visible where public-health workflows extend into rural clinics, pharmacies and district hospitals.","sector":"Telecom Connectivity / Broadband Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"National registries, health IDs, consent systems, analytics and AI workloads require secure hosting, storage, uptime, cooling and backup-power infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","BLUESTARCO","CUMMINSIND"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Indirect capex beneficiary; demand may route through cloud/data-centre operators and government system integrators.","sector":"Data Centres, Power Backup and Cooling","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large-scale health records and drug registries raise privacy, identity, consent-management and cyber-risk requirements, creating demand for endpoint security, audits, encryption and incident-response services.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUICKHEAL","TAC","63MOONS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Health data sensitivity makes security spend politically and operationally hard to defer.","sector":"Cybersecurity / Digital Trust","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"A national drug registry can push manufacturers and distributors toward better batch-level traceability, QR/barcode labelling, anti-counterfeit packaging and serialization workflows.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","EPL","TCPLPACK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how mandatory and granular registry compliance becomes.","sector":"Packaging, Labelling and Track-and-Trace","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Drug registry integration can change inventory verification, recall management, substitution checks and dispensing workflows for wholesalers, chains and online pharmacies.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["MEDPLUS","APOLLOHOSP","ENTERO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Compliance burden initially negative; larger organised players may gain share from better ability to integrate.","sector":"Pharma Distribution / Retail Pharmacy","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Better drug traceability and digital inventory records can increase formal logistics requirements, especially for temperature-sensitive medicines, vaccines and recall-ready supply chains.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant if registry rules extend into distribution-chain reporting and batch-level movement tracking.","sector":"Logistics and Cold Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Provider-focused digital solutions and interoperable records increase demand for connected devices, hospital IT-linked equipment, patient monitoring systems and digitised clinical workflows.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["POLYMED","BPL","KRSNAA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect beneficiary through hospitals upgrading devices and workflow capture around digital records.","sector":"Medical Devices and Hospital Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Citizen health apps, digital claims, teleconsultations, pharmacy purchases and public-health benefit flows can increase embedded payment, reconciliation and identity-linked transaction use cases.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["PAYTM","NSDL","CAMS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely second-order; strongest if government health apps include payments, reimbursements or benefit-transfer layers.","sector":"Digital Payments / Fintech Rails","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 23 Sep 2026 | unspecified | ₹0.5 |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹0.5 |
| 12 Jul 2024 | unspecified | ₹0.5 |
| 10 Oct 2023 | split | ₹0 |
| 1 Sep 2023 | unspecified | ₹5 |
| 8 Sep 2022 | unspecified | ₹5 |
| 8 Sep 2021 | unspecified | ₹4.3 |
| 17 Sep 2020 | unspecified | ₹1.75 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2024-2518 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.