SG Mart Limited
NSE: SGMARTTrading - Metals
Share price
₹775.60
+4.32% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
43
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹10,083 Cr
P/E ratio
81.1
P/B ratio
6.1
ROCE
10.2%
ROE
7.9%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Our sales figures for this company step up at Sep 2023 and we hold nothing that says why, so we cannot honestly quote a growth rate across it.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
Our sales figures for this company step up at Sep 2023 and we hold nothing that says why, so there is no honest growth rate of its own to set against its sector.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
It has no steady three-year profit record yet, so growth cannot be weighed against the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SG Mart Limited — this one | — | 77.7× | — |
| Lloyds Enterprises Limited | -40%/yr | 98.5× | — |
| Mangalam Worldwide Limited | 54%/yr | 23.6× | ₹0.44 |
| Nupur Recyclers Limited | 5%/yr | 64.5× | ₹12.9 |
| BMW Ventures Limited | 5%/yr | 10.6× | ₹2.1 |
| Abans Enterprises Limited | -38%/yr | 6.2× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Trading - Metals), it ranks 4 of 7 on returns, 2 of 7 on growth, 6 of 7 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 10.2% on capital, ahead of 43% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years the business itself consumed ₹96 crore of cash before any plant spend, funded from lenders and shareholders. And the profit is not backed by cash: it reported a profit over 7 years and consumed cash from the business. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being paid 685 days before it paid its own suppliers to waiting 7 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
6 of 9 checks clear · 67%
Latest result
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Results are expected soon.
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹10,083 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹775.60
- 52w High
- ₹861
- 52w Low
- ₹313
- Enterprise value
- ₹9,367 Cr
- Beta
- 0.8
- Price CAGR 1y
- 113.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 32.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 112.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 87.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 4.9%
- PEG ratio
- —
- P/E ratio
- 81.1
- P/B ratio
- 6.1
- EV / EBITDA
- 58.5
- Industry P/E
- 23.8
- ROCE
- 10.2%
- ROCE 5y average
- 9.5%
- ROE
- 7.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.2
- Interest coverage
- 3.8
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 8.0%
- ROE last year
- 8.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹6,315 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹111 Cr
- Operating margin
- 2.2%
- Net profit margin
- 1.8%
- EBITDA margin
- 2.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- 1181.6%
- Sales growth 5y
- 270.9%
- Profit growth 3y
- —
- Profit growth 5y
- —
- EPS
- ₹8.8
- Sales growth TTM
- 10.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹1,309 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹46 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 14.4%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 43.8%
- OPM latest quarter
- 4.5%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹123
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹268 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹984 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹268 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 121.8
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹258 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹27 Cr
- FCF yield
- -0.2%
- Net cash flow
- ₹396 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 57.9%
- FII holding
- 1.9%
- DII holding
- 4.1%
- Public holding
- 36.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyds Enterpris | 74.97 | 100.5 | 11,461 | 0.19 | 110.0 | -74.5 | 563.0 | 70.2 | 3.7 |
| SG Mart | 734.45 | 74.5 | 9,260 | 0.00 | 45.6 | 41.1 | 1,308.6 | 14.4 | 10.2 |
| Mangalam World. | 41.24 | 23.6 | 1,225 | 0.07 | 12.0 | 17.7 | 316.2 | 14.7 | 17.7 |
| Nupur Recyclers | 160.90 | 64.8 | 1,111 | 0.00 | 7.4 | 83.0 | 79.3 | 55.6 | 15.1 |
| BMW Ventures | 50.37 | 10.9 | 437 | 2.99 | 10.6 | 31.8 | 608.9 | 25.6 | 11.9 |
| ABans Enterprise | 28.24 | 6.2 | 197 | 0.00 | 32.7 | 598.5 | 1,889.4 | 39.3 | 4.9 |
| Emergent Indust. | 413.00 | 124.2 | 189 | 0.00 | 0.7 | 56.8 | 176.1 | 230.0 | 11.4 |
| Median | 62.67 | 44.2 | 774 | 0.00 | 11.3 | 44.4 | 439.6 | 46.9 | 11.7 |
Competes with: Abans Enterprises Limited, Ashoka Metcast Limited, BMW Ventures Limited, Lloyds Enterprises Limited, Mangalam Worldwide Limited, Nupur Recyclers Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 151 | 506 | 748 | 1,278 | 1,134 | 1,793 | 1,335 | 1,595 | 1,144 | 1,704 | 1,644 | 1,823 | 1,309 |
| Expenses | 149 | 495 | 731 | 1,246 | 1,109 | 1,778 | 1,313 | 1,558 | 1,108 | 1,676 | 1,628 | 1,767 | 1,250 |
| Material Cost | 101 | 153 | 134 | 135 | |||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -100 | 93 | 7.59 | 71 | |||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 1,652 | 1,360 | 1,597 | 1,014 | |||||||||
| Employee Cost | 8.14 | 8.43 | 7.95 | 8.30 | |||||||||
| Other Expenses | 15 | 13 | 21 | 21 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 2 | 11 | 17 | 32 | 25 | 15 | 22 | 37 | 36 | 28 | 17 | 56 | 59 |
| OPM % | 1.21 | 2.22 | 2.28 | 2.48 | 2.18 | 0.83 | 1.63 | 2.32 | 3.14 | 1.64 | 1.02 | 3.07 | 4.49 |
| Other Income | 0 | 1 | 10 | 21 | 19 | 20 | 26 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 12 | 10 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 13 | 10 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 10 | 6 |
| Depreciation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Profit before tax | 2 | 12 | 23 | 44 | 36 | 22 | 37 | 42 | 43 | 33 | 14 | 54 | 58 |
| Tax % | 26 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 21 | 24 | 20 | 21 | 23 | 22 |
| Net Profit | 1 | 9 | 17 | 34 | 26 | 16 | 28 | 33 | 32 | 27 | 11 | 41 | 46 |
| EPS in Rs | 0.64 | 1.12 | 1.53 | 3.01 | 2.36 | 1.42 | 2.50 | 2.95 | 2.56 | 2.11 | 0.85 | 3.29 | 3.62 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 2.11 | 0.85 | 3.29 | 3.61 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 2,683 | 5,856 | 6,315 | 6,480 |
| Expenses | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2,621 | 5,753 | 6,179 | 6,321 |
| Material Cost | 423 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -2.71 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 5,666 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 31 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 61 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 1 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 62 | 103 | 137 | 160 |
| OPM % | 54 | 89 | 70 | 56 | 2.30 | 1.80 | 2.20 | 2.50 |
| Other Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 32 | 80 | 69 | 58 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 44 | 51 | 45 |
| Depreciation | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.51 | 2.08 | 12 | 14 |
| Profit before tax | -0 | 5 | 1 | -1 | 81 | 137 | 143 | 159 |
| Tax % | -700 | 4 | 31 | -225 | 25 | 25 | 22 | |
| Net Profit | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 61 | 103 | 111 | 124 |
| EPS in Rs | 0.06 | 2.56 | 0.30 | 0.44 | 5.46 | 9.20 | 8.81 | 9.87 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 8.92 | |||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 38 | 2 | 16 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 139%
- 5 years
- 271%
- 3 years
- 1182%
- TTM
- 10%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 96%
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- —
- TTM
- 14%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 87%
- 5 years
- 112%
- 3 years
- 32%
- 1 year
- 113%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 8%
- Last year
- 8%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 13 |
| Reserves | 5 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 1,076 | 1,197 | 1,584 |
| Borrowings | 18 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 182 | 722 | 268 |
| Other Liabilities | 3 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 218 | 368 | 385 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | ||||||
| Total Liabilities | 27 | 30 | 26 | 12 | 1,487 | 2,298 | 2,250 |
| Fixed Assets | 25 | 24 | 23 | 1 | 39 | 216 | 385 |
| CWIP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 76 | 20 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 2 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 1,431 | 2,006 | 1,845 |
| Total Assets | 27 | 30 | 26 | 12 | 1,487 | 2,298 | 2,250 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 0 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 30 | -391 | 258 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 0 | 0 | -0 | 16 | -1,104 | -87 | 404 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 0 | -5 | -5 | -12 | 1,186 | 479 | -266 |
| Net Cash Flow | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 111 | 1 | 396 |
| Free Cash Flow | 0 | 5 | 6 | 20 | -75 | -549 | 27 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 207 | 117 | 30 | 27 | 12 | 20 | 15 |
| Inventory Days | 10 | 16 | 18 | ||||
| Days Payable | 28 | 21 | 24 | ||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 207 | 117 | 30 | 27 | -6 | 15 | 10 |
| Working Capital Days | -1,216 | 41 | -685 | 278 | -20 | -13 | 7 |
| ROCE % | 28 | 9 | 8 | 11 | 10 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-716inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
31,30,12,429inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about SG Mart Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- hot rolled coils / HR sheets
- raw steel for solar module mounting structures
- steel billets
- zinc ingots
Depends on the price of
- steel
- zinc
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Metals & Mining
- Industry
- Trading - Metals
- Classification
- Metals & Mining › Trading - Metals
- ISIN
- INE385F01024
Plants
- Bangalore Service Centre cum Warehouse
- Dujana / North Service Centre cum Warehouse
- Pune Service Centre cum Warehouse
- Raipur Service Centre cum Warehouse
- SG Mart Dubai Service Centre (SG Marts FZE)
News impact
Big market events that reach SG Mart Limited, and how the effect spreads.
15 Sept, 19:30 IST · Market event · medium impact
EU votes to scrap carbon levy brake
The EU parliament voted to remove the pause button on its carbon import levy, so Indian steel and aluminium sellers to Europe face higher costs and thinner profits, while EU-based producers gain shelter from cheaper imports.
Who it hits first
- The EU parliament voted to scrap the emergency brake in its carbon border levy (CBAM) — the safety clause that could pause the duty during a crisis. Without that brake, the levy lands firmly on carbon-heavy imports, chiefly steel and aluminium. For Indian steel and aluminium makers that sell into Europe, this means paying the carbon charge in full: either EU buyers pay more and order less, or Indian exporters swallow the cost and earn less per tonne. The vote is not yet law — member states disagree, so weeks of negotiation lie ahead — but the direction is toward a stricter, not softer, levy.
Who may gain
- Steel and aluminium producers based inside the EU gain shelter, since imported metal now carries a fuller carbon cost and their own output looks more competitive. Among Indian names, the relatively insulated are domestic-focused makers with little EU exposure, and Hindalco partly: its European arm (Novelis) sits inside the shelter even as its Indian aluminium exports face the levy. No Indian company clearly gains sales from this vote.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
European end-users of steel and aluminium — car makers, builders, packaging firms — pay more for metal, while Indian engineering and construction buyers could see marginally cheaper domestic steel if export volumes get diverted home.
Upstream
If EU-bound steel output softens, miners of steel inputs (iron ore, coking coal) see slightly weaker order books from steel plants over the coming quarter, though domestic and Asian demand cushions most of the hit.
Where demand moves
Business
EU buyers of Indian steel and aluminium face higher all-in prices as the carbon charge firms up, so they order less from India or demand discounts; displaced Indian metal gets pushed toward home, Middle East and Asian buyers, which can soften domestic steel prices and trim margins even for makers that never export to Europe.
Capital
Short-term money is likely to step back from export-exposed steel and aluminium names and rotate toward domestic-demand metals, capital-goods users of cheaper steel, or defensive sectors until the parliament-council negotiation clarifies how strict the final levy will be.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mild positive at the margin: diverted steel supply could mean steadier, cheaper domestic steel for equipment and project makers.
Metals & Mining
Direct negative: steel and aluminium exporters face higher EU costs or lower EU volumes; sentiment weighs on the whole sector near term.
Power
Neutral to slightly soft: any dip in steel-plant output trims power and coal demand a touch, but the effect is small against total consumption.
Services
Neutral to slightly soft: lower EU-bound metals volumes mean marginally less freight and port handling on those routes.
Commodity angle
Commodity
steel
Note
Demand/realisation shock, not input-cost: the EU parliament vote removes the CBAM pause mechanism, raising EU landed costs for Indian steel and aluminium. Direction is set from policy (negative for exporters). No steel edge carries cost_weight_pct, so no margin bps is computable and none is invented. The vote faces a member-state clash and is not final.
Price updated at
2026-09-15T11:56:57.642Z
Shock type
demand
Unit
USD/short ton
When it plays out
Immediate
1-7 days: export-exposed steel and aluminium stocks slip 1-3% on sentiment as markets price a stricter levy; watch for member-state responses and EU buyer commentary.
Medium term
1-6 months: final CBAM terms settle; exporters adjust pricing and destinations, margin impact shows in quarterly results, and talk of low-carbon (green steel) upgrades picks up.
Short term
1-4 weeks: parliament-council negotiation signals how much of the brake removal survives; exporters comment on EU order books and whether they will absorb, pass through, or reroute volumes.
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
India notifies the MMDR Amendment Act 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling unpaid pre-Act state levies - Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh threaten to move the Supreme Court
A new mining law stops state governments charging miners extra taxes on the land their mines sit on and wipes out the unpaid old bills, which saves money for miners like Coal India, NMDC, Tata Steel and SAIL - but the states say they will fight it in the Supreme Court.
Who it hits first
- Companies that own their own mines in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh no longer face open-ended state cess bills. Tata Steel, SAIL, NMDC, Coal India and Hindustan Copper had been staring at instalment payments that were due to start from April 2026, and the unpaid part of those bills is now wiped out.
- Manganese and copper miners with pits in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan get the same certainty, but a smaller one, because those states never levied the aggressive cesses that the eastern states did.
Who may gain
- NMDC and Coal India, which sell ore and coal at administered prices and could not pass a state cess on to buyers, keep the money instead.
- Integrated steel makers that dig their own iron ore and coal - Tata Steel, SAIL, Jindal Steel - see the cost of self-mined ore stop drifting upward.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, aluminium smelters and thermal power stations that buy domestic ore and coal are the end users. Their input bills stop being exposed to a state deciding to add a new cess mid-contract, which makes long-term supply pricing easier to fix.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and mine-developer-operators get more predictable client budgets, because their customers no longer have to set aside cash for disputed state levies. Adani Enterprises, which runs mines for state generators, is the clearest example.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing changes in how much ore or coal India buys. What changes is who keeps the cash: money that would have flowed from miners to state treasuries stays with the miners. Steel mills that buy ore in the open market may eventually see slightly cheaper ore because sellers no longer have to build a state cess into their price.
Capital
If the relief is believed, money rotates into the companies with the biggest cancelled bills - Tata Steel, SAIL, Coal India, NMDC. So far it has not: the group is flat to down over the eight sessions since the Bill passed, which says investors are waiting to see whether the states win in court before paying for it.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and contract-mining order books become easier to plan once miners are not holding cash back for disputed tax bills.
Metals & Mining
Contingent liabilities set aside for state mineral cesses can be written back, and the cash cost of self-mined ore stops rising.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India, which faced some of the largest state demands on coal-bearing land, keeps cash it had provided for.
Power
Thermal generators buying domestic coal get more predictable fuel costs, since coal suppliers no longer need to price in a possible state cess.
When it plays out
Immediate
Little share-price reaction is likely, because the Act was already notified on 17 August and the market has had eight sessions to react and did not. Watch for companies quantifying the write-back in their September-quarter results.
Medium term
If the Act survives, mining project economics improve permanently and captive-mine expansion becomes easier to underwrite. If it is struck down, the twelve-year instalment clock from the 2024 ruling restarts.
Short term
State governments file in the Supreme Court. Any interim order that stays the Act would hand the relief straight back and hit the same shares.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower legal/tax uncertainty for limestone and other mineral-bearing land reduces contingent cost risk for cement producers with captive mines; if states cannot add mineral levies, royalty-linked input inflation risk eases for clinker/cement capacity in mineral-rich states.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for cement companies with captive limestone exposure or large eastern/central India operations.","sector":"Construction Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cost certainty for iron ore, coal and aggregates can reduce pass-through risk in steel, cement and power inputs; lower perceived project-cost inflation supports EPC margins and road/rail/industrial capex execution.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","PNCINFRA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order effect depends on whether miners and metal producers pass cost relief through to customers.","sector":"Infrastructure \u0026 Construction","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If steel and cement cost pressures ease, construction input-cost volatility declines for developers; lower commodity-linked working-capital stress can support project margins and launch economics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect and likely smaller than demand, interest-rate and local approval drivers.","sector":"Realty","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced tax overhang for domestic iron ore, manganese and steel producers improves steel cost visibility; auto OEMs and component makers benefit if flat/long steel price risk moderates.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More visible for steel-intensive vehicles, forgings and components; pass-through contracts may dilute near-term benefit.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty in steel, copper and aluminium supply chains can stabilize input costs for appliances, cables and electrical goods; improved metal availability reduces procurement risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and depends on commodity price transmission rather than the legal change itself.","sector":"Consumer Durables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cancellation of unpaid pre-Act levies lowers contingent liabilities and credit-risk tail events for leveraged miners, steel producers and power-linked borrowers; banks/NBFCs with commodity-sector exposure may see reduced provisioning risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large diversified lenders see diluted impact; project financiers with metals, mining and power exposure are more relevant.","sector":"Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral extraction and dispatch plans become less constrained by tax uncertainty, rail, port and bulk logistics volumes for coal, iron ore, steel and allied minerals may improve; eastern corridor movement benefits most.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume effect requires actual production/dispatch response, not just accounting relief.","sector":"Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mining-cost certainty for coal, limestone, rock phosphate and mineral inputs can marginally improve domestic raw-material availability and energy-cost visibility for fertilizer and industrial chemical producers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","GNFC","CHAMBLFERT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive input-cost effect may be offset by administered pricing, subsidy timing and global commodity trends.","sector":"Chemicals \u0026 Fertilizers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states lose potential retrospective levy collections, which can pressure state capex, receivables discipline or subsidy payments; utilities and contractors exposed to Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh state entities could see mixed fiscal knock-ons.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","IRB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Not a pure NSE sector classification, but relevant as a cross-sector fiscal transmission channel.","sector":"State-Focused Public Finance / Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
Parliament passes the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling uncollected past mineral levies
Parliament has stopped state governments from charging their own taxes on mining, and cancelled old state demands that were never actually collected - a large windfall for miners and steel makers like Tata Steel, Coal India and NMDC, and a revenue loss for mineral-rich states such as Jharkhand and Odisha.
Who it hits first
- Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026, which stops state governments charging their own taxes and cesses on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, and cancels past state demands that were never actually deposited or recovered. This directly reverses the effect of the Supreme Court's July and August 2024 rulings, which had let states tax minerals and recover those taxes going back to April 2005. Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, limestone and copper - and integrated steel makers with their own captive mines - lose a large, open-ended liability from their accounts.
Who may gain
- Integrated steel makers with captive mines, above all Tata Steel, which had disclosed one of the largest provisions against retrospective state mineral demands.
- Iron-ore, coal and manganese miners - NMDC, Coal India, MOIL and Hindustan Copper - whose per-tonne cost becomes predictable again.
- Cement makers with captive limestone quarries, whose cess exposure is now capped by the Centre rather than open to state discretion.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and power stations that buy these minerals get a more predictable delivered cost, because the risk of a state suddenly adding a cess to their input price is now removed. That improves the reliability of their own margin guidance rather than lowering their costs today.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and equipment suppliers gain, because miners freed of a large contingent liability can restart or accelerate expansion projects. Solar Industries and mine-development contractors sit in this queue, though orders typically follow two to three quarters behind the cash release.
Where demand moves
Business
No physical supply is disrupted, so tonnage does not change hands. What changes is money: a contingent tax claim worth tens of thousands of crores across the industry is cancelled, so cash that miners had set aside stays with them. That cash tends to go into paying down debt and into expansion capital spending, which over the next few quarters means more orders for mining equipment, explosives, and mine-development contractors. In the opposite direction, mineral-rich state governments - Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh - lose an expected revenue stream, which can slow their own infrastructure spending and hurt companies dependent on those state budgets.
Capital
Money should rotate into the metals and mining sector generally, and within it towards the companies that had actually provided for the retrospective demand - those get a direct, quantifiable write-back - rather than towards recyclers and traders that never had the liability. Some money may rotate out of state-government-dependent contractors and state-focused lenders in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and explosives makers benefit as freed-up cash funds expansion.
Construction Materials
Cement makers with captive limestone lose an open-ended state cess risk.
Financial Services
Lenders concentrated in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh face a modest negative as those state budgets lose an expected revenue line.
Metals & Mining
A large contingent liability is removed and future mining costs become predictable.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India's state cess exposure is capped, the single largest such exposure in the country.
Power
Thermal generators get more predictable delivered coal costs.
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect mining and metals stocks to open higher, with the biggest moves in the names that had actually disclosed provisions - Tata Steel, Coal India, NMDC. Note the historical precedent runs the other way and is noisy: on the two adverse Supreme Court dates in 2024 these same stocks closed higher the following day, because the bad news had already been absorbed on the ruling day itself.
Medium term
Over one to six months the durable effect is lower and more predictable mining costs, which supports Indian steel and cement margins. The offsetting risk is that mineral-rich states cut their own capital spending, which would hurt regional contractors and state-focused lenders.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch for companies to quantify the write-back in exchange filings - that is what turns a headline into an earnings number. Jharkhand and Odisha are likely to challenge the law or seek compensation, and any credible legal challenge would take some of the gain back.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Removal of contingent mineral-tax liabilities improves cash-flow visibility and credit metrics for mining, steel, cement and power borrowers; lower probability of stressed working-capital drawdowns or covenant breaches benefits lenders and financiers exposed to these sectors.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is indirect and strongest for lenders with commodity, infrastructure, PSU and project-finance exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower tax uncertainty for coal, iron ore, limestone and metal producers can support mine dispatches, steel/cement production planning and bulk commodity movement; higher freight volumes benefit rail-linked logistics and port handlers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on whether producers convert liability relief into higher output rather than balance-sheet repair.","sector":"Railways \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved capex confidence in steel, metals and mining can lift demand for oxygen, nitrogen, argon, acetylene, electrodes and welding consumables used in smelting, fabrication and maintenance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LINDEINDIA","INOXINDIA","ADORWELD"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order capex and utilization play; not an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Industrial Gases \u0026 Welding Consumables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel, cement and non-ferrous producers facing lower mineral-levy risk may run plants at steadier utilization and restart deferred maintenance/capacity programs, increasing demand for refractory bricks, monolithics and kiln/ladle linings.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["RHIM","IFGLEXPOR","VESUVIUS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant if steel and cement producers expand output after cost visibility improves.","sector":"Refractories \u0026 Industrial Ceramics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral-rich states lose expected retrospective levy revenues, their fiscal room for state-funded roads, irrigation and local infrastructure may tighten; however lower steel/cement cost risk can support project economics for contractors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IRB","PNCINFRA","ASHOKA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative state-capex channel versus positive input-cost visibility channel.","sector":"Roads \u0026 Infrastructure Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cement and steel cost uncertainty eases as limestone, iron ore and coal levy risks are capped; this can improve margin visibility for developers and building-material users if input prices stabilize.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","OBEROIRLTY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pass-through and demand conditions matter more than the tax change, so the link is defensible but diluted.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty around steel, aluminium and copper supply costs can reduce input-cost volatility for vehicle makers and component suppliers, especially if metal producers pass through some benefit via prices or stable contracts.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Third-order effect; stronger for metal-intensive CV, tractor, forging and component chains.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states facing weaker revenue expectations may slow payments, local schemes or contractor spending, potentially softening rural liquidity and credit demand in affected regions such as Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CREDITACC","SPANDANA","UJJIVANSFB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regional and fiscal-transmission risk; not a direct balance-sheet hit from the Bill.","sector":"State-Focused NBFCs \u0026 Microfinance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"With retrospective levy overhang reduced, miners may have greater certainty to maintain or expand extraction plans, supporting demand for industrial explosives, blasting services, mine development and contract mining.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SOLARINDS","GOCLCORP","GMDCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most sensitive to actual mine production growth and tender activity after policy clarity.","sector":"Explosives \u0026 Mining Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
11 Aug, 04:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
Government introduces the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026 barring states from levying their own taxes on mining and expanding central control over mineral-bearing land
A new Bill would stop state governments charging their own extra taxes on mining, which makes digging up iron ore, coal and manganese cheaper and more predictable for miners, while state governments lose a source of revenue.
Who it hits first
- Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, copper and lignite stop facing state-specific cesses on top of central royalty, so the cost per tonne becomes predictable again.
- The retrospective-demand risk created by the Supreme Court ruling is capped, removing a contingent liability that had been sitting over the sector.
- State governments in Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Gujarat lose a revenue tool, and state-owned miners like GMDC sit awkwardly on both sides.
Who may gain
- Steel makers with captive iron ore and coal mines, such as Jindal Steel & Power, get cheaper internal raw material.
- Pure-play miners with clean balance sheets - Hindustan Copper and MOIL, both effectively debt-free - keep more of the saving.
- New bidders for mineral blocks gain cost certainty, which is what the Bill is explicitly designed to encourage.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and thermal power stations downstream of the mines get more predictable input costs; those with captive mines capture the saving directly, while merchant buyers only benefit if miners pass it through. Cement makers gain limestone-levy certainty and thermal generators gain better visibility on delivered coal cost, which feeds into tariff filings.
Upstream
Mining equipment makers, explosives suppliers and mine-development contractors upstream of the miners gain, because predictable levies revive stalled block development and auction participation. State governments, which sit upstream as the levying authority, lose the revenue and may litigate, which is the main risk to the whole chain.
Where demand moves
Business
No new demand for minerals is created - the same tonnes get mined - but the cost of mining each tonne falls and becomes predictable, which makes marginal blocks economic and should bring more auction bids over time. Downstream, steel makers with captive mines see the saving inside their own cost line, while merchant ore buyers see it only if miners choose to pass it on rather than keep it.
Capital
Money rotates within Metals & Mining toward companies that actually own and operate mines and can bank the saving - Hindustan Copper, MOIL, Jindal Steel & Power - and away from downstream converters and traders like Arfin India and SG Mart, whose benefit is second-hand. Investors will also reprice the contingent-liability discount that had been applied to miners exposed to retrospective state demands.
How it spreads across sectors
Construction Materials
Limestone levy certainty helps cement makers plan captive-mine economics.
Metals & Mining
Lower and more predictable landed ore cost; the retrospective-demand overhang is capped.
Power
Coal cost visibility improves for thermal generators, feeding into more stable tariff filings.
codex additions
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- State mining levies capped
- Cost per tonne of ore falls and becomes predictable
- Captive-mine steel makers widen margins
- Mineral block auctions attract more bidders
- Mining equipment and explosives order books rise
Pattern name
Govt Capex Cascade
Sectors queried
- Metals & Mining
- Power
- Construction Materials
When it plays out
Immediate
Mining and captive-mine steel names open firm; state-owned miners whose owners lose revenue, like GMDC, trade mixed.
Medium term
If the Bill becomes law and survives challenge, expect stronger participation in mineral block auctions and a structural narrowing of the risk discount applied to Indian mining assets.
Short term
Watch the Bill's passage through both Houses and whether mineral-bearing states challenge it - a constitutional challenge would reinstate the uncertainty the Bill removes.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty on iron ore, manganese and other mineral levies improves raw-material cost visibility for steel and alloy producers, especially firms buying ore from merchant miners or bidding for mines.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JSWSTEEL","JINDALSTEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Already adjacent to mining, but the separate downstream steel margin effect is worth tracking.","sector":"Steel \u0026 Alloy Producers","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"More commercially attractive mining projects and clearer central control over mineral-bearing land can revive mine expansion, equipment orders, crushing systems, conveyors and heavy earthmoving demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BEML","LT","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book impact is likely lagged rather than immediate.","sector":"Mining Equipment \u0026 Capital Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher mineral output and new mine auctions increase bulk movement of coal, iron ore, bauxite and limestone through rail corridors, ports and inland logistics networks.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefits depend on actual volume growth, not just lower tax uncertainty.","sector":"Logistics, Rail Freight \u0026 Ports","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower mineral and metal cost uncertainty can reduce input-cost volatility for roads, bridges, urban infrastructure and industrial projects while supporting faster mine-linked capex.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","KNRCON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect benefit through steel, cement and project execution economics.","sector":"Infrastructure EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced retrospective levy risk improves cash-flow visibility for miners and metal companies, lowering credit-risk perception and making mining-linked capex easier to finance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","BANKBARODA","CANBK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant for lenders with PSU, infrastructure and commodity-sector exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Project Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower and more predictable steel, aluminium and battery-mineral input costs can support margins for vehicle makers and component suppliers if commodity prices soften.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Transmission is indirect and may be offset by global metal prices.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Greater central control and improved mining economics can support domestic availability of copper, aluminium, zinc and critical minerals used in cables, transmission equipment and renewable infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["POLYCAB","KEI","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More structural than immediate; depends on mineral-specific auction and production follow-through.","sector":"Electrical Equipment, Cables \u0026 Renewables Supply Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral levy caps reduce volatility in cement, steel and aggregates, construction cost inflation pressure can ease for developers and building-product firms.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and diluted by land, financing and demand factors.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Clearer rules for mineral-bearing land and lower levy risk may improve economics for domestic mining or processing of mineral inputs such as rock phosphate, limestone and other industrial minerals used in agri-input value chains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["COROMANDEL","CHAMBLFERT","GNFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"India still relies heavily on imported fertilizer minerals, so the link is defensible but limited.","sector":"Fertilizers \u0026 Agri Inputs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
27 Jun, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
India opens anti-dumping probe into cheap steel imports from China, Japan and Russia
Who it hits first
- Domestic integrated steel producers (Tata Steel, SAIL, JSW Steel, Jindal Steel, Jai Balaji) gain from import protection and firmer realisations
Who may gain
- Domestic primary steel producers; iron-ore-light integrated mills as ore prices soften
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel-consuming pipe/fabrication/auto/appliance makers face higher input cost as protected domestic prices hold
Upstream
Iron ore miners (NMDC) and coking-coal suppliers see firmer domestic steel demand; ore prices soft (-8% MoM) so upstream pricing power limited
Where demand moves
Business
Cheaper imported steel curbed -> demand shifts to domestic mills (positive producers); steel-consuming fabricators (SG Mart, Hi-Tech Pipes, JTL) face higher input costs and margin compression
Capital
Rotation into large-cap steel producers (Tata Steel, SAIL) on protection theme; selective exit from steel-consuming small/mid-cap fabricators
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
mild margin pressure from firmer steel input
Capital Goods
negative for steel pipe/fabrication on input-cost rise
Construction
higher rebar/structural steel cost
Metals & Mining
positive for domestic steel producers on import protection
Commodity angle
Commodity
steel
Shock type
price
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Anti-dumping on Chinese/Japanese/Russian steel
- Domestic steel prices protected
- Producers gain / fabricators face input-cost rise
Pattern name
China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Metals & Mining
- Capital Goods
- Automobile and Auto Components
- Construction
When it plays out
Immediate
Steel producer stocks firm on protection sentiment; consuming fabricators soften
Medium term
If duties confirmed (5-yr precedent), structural margin support for domestic mills; consumers reset pricing
Short term
Provisional duty decision watched; domestic spreads widen with soft iron ore
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Potential anti-dumping duties -\u003e domestic flat steel prices stay firm -\u003e higher reinforcement/structural/fixtures cost for residential and commercial projects -\u003e margin pressure or delayed launches if costs cannot be passed through","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DLF","GODREJPROP","LODHA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Construction is already noted, but listed real estate developers are a distinct pass-through/margin channel.","sector":"Real Estate Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Protected steel pricing -\u003e higher cost for bridges, metros, highways, transmission towers and industrial EPC -\u003e working-capital needs rise and fixed-price contracts face margin pressure","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["LT","KEC","PNCINFRA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is stronger where contracts have limited price-escalation clauses.","sector":"Infrastructure EPC and Roads","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Flat steel import restrictions -\u003e domestic steel availability/pricing becomes more important for rolling stock, wagons, shipbuilding and defence fabrication -\u003e order execution margins can compress unless procurement is indexed","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TITAGARH","BEML","MAZDOCK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Demand remains policy-supported, but input-cost risk rises for fabricators.","sector":"Railways and Defence Manufacturing","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Firmer flat steel prices -\u003e higher input cost for refrigerators, washing machines, AC outdoor units and kitchen appliances -\u003e gross-margin pressure or price hikes affecting demand elasticity","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Steel is one of several inputs, so impact is usually smaller than for pure fabricators.","sector":"Consumer Durables and Appliances","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Potential duties on flat products -\u003e tinplate/cold-rolled steel cost support -\u003e higher packaging cost for cans, closures and industrial containers -\u003e margin pressure for metal packaging users and converters","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TINPLATE","UFLEX","JINDALPOLY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Listed pure-play metal packaging options are limited; impact may appear through input-cost sensitivity.","sector":"Packaging and Metal Containers","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher steel plate/coil prices -\u003e pipe and pipeline project costs rise -\u003e CGD expansion, refinery pipelines and gas transmission capex face cost inflation -\u003e EPC margins and project IRRs affected","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["GAIL","GUJGASLTD","IGL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Utilities may pass through some costs over time, but near-term capex economics can weaken.","sector":"Oil \u0026 Gas Transmission and City Gas Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel price support -\u003e towers, module mounting structures, wind turbine towers and balance-of-plant costs rise -\u003e renewable EPC and transmission equipment margins face pressure","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["SUZLON","INOXWIND","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Wind and transmission structures have meaningful steel intensity.","sector":"Power Transmission and Renewables Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower finished-steel imports from China/Japan/Russia if duties follow -\u003e reduced import cargo volumes at ports and lower inbound container/bulk movement -\u003e partially offset by higher domestic steel dispatches","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Net effect depends on whether domestic steel movement replaces lost import volumes.","sector":"Logistics, Ports and Shipping","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel producer margins improve from firmer prices and lower ore costs -\u003e better cash flows for leveraged metal borrowers; downstream MSME fabricators face working-capital stress from higher inputs -\u003e asset-quality impact diverges by borrower mix","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SBIN","PNB","CANBK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Public-sector banks have historically meaningful exposure to metals and infrastructure borrowers.","sector":"Banking and NBFC Credit Exposure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 1 rows from NSE's archive (replace 0, delete 0, insert 1), 2026-02-01..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 1 Feb 2026
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2625 Aug 2026
- Earnings call20 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.