BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED
NSE: BORORENEWGlass - Industrial
Share price
₹430.40
+0.07% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 7 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
68
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹6,026 Cr
P/E ratio
16.2
P/B ratio
4.0
ROCE
25.3%
ROE
25.7%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 11.0% over the past year, and 12.8% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 12.7% to 31.2% over the last three years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 12.8% a year against a sector median of 10.6% — 2.2 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 0.2 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 68%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED — this one | 68%/yr | 16.2× | ₹0.24 |
| Hindustan Aeronautics | 16%/yr | 33.4× | ₹2.1 |
| Bharat Electronics | 27%/yr | 43.8× | ₹1.6 |
| Bharat Heavy Electricals | 36%/yr | 62.0× | ₹1.7 |
| Tata Motors Limited | — | 20.3× | — |
| ABB India | — | 92.4× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies across the whole Capital Goods sector, it ranks 80 of 411 on returns, 166 of 390 on growth, 27 of 410 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A wide advantage: it earns 25.3% on capital, ahead of 81% of companies across its whole sector. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹561 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹1056 crore on plant and equipment, ₹495 crore more than it made; the gap was from lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 10 years, about 179 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 69 days for its cash to waiting 17 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
8 of 9 checks clear · 89%
Latest result
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Results are expected soon.
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹6,026 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹430.40
- 52w High
- ₹721
- 52w Low
- ₹374
- Enterprise value
- ₹5,532 Cr
- Beta
- 1.4
- Price CAGR 1y
- -27.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 0.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 6.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 27.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 7.0%
- PEG ratio
- 0.2
- P/E ratio
- 16.2
- P/B ratio
- 4.0
- EV / EBITDA
- 11.0
- Industry P/E
- 30.7
- ROCE
- 25.3%
- ROCE 5y average
- 6.8%
- ROE
- 25.7%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.1
- Interest coverage
- 11.1
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 5.0%
- ROE last year
- 26.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹1,556 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹127 Cr
- Operating margin
- 28.0%
- Net profit margin
- 8.2%
- EBITDA margin
- 28.3%
- Sales growth 3y
- 20.4%
- Sales growth 5y
- 19.7%
- Profit growth 3y
- 68.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- —
- EPS
- ₹9.2
- Sales growth TTM
- 11.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 751.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹406 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹87 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 17.1%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- —
- OPM latest quarter
- 31.4%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹108
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹162 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹78 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹162 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 106.9
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹423 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹226 Cr
- FCF yield
- 3.5%
- Net cash flow
- ₹8 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 56.0%
- FII holding
- 5.6%
- DII holding
- 3.3%
- Public holding
- 35.0%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borosil Renew. | 438.10 | 17.3 | 6,435 | 0.00 | 86.6 | 16939.4 | 405.7 | 17.1 | 25.3 |
| Borosil Scienti. | 115.03 | 23.1 | 1,027 | 0.00 | 4.4 | 94.0 | 106.8 | 11.2 | 12.1 |
| Sejal Glass | 680.55 | 24.8 | 781 | 0.00 | 7.2 | 63.4 | 118.0 | 52.9 | 18.6 |
| Agarwal Toughene | 175.55 | 15.7 | 339 | 0.00 | 9.3 | -12.1 | 49.0 | 48.5 | 23.0 |
| Agarwal Float | 24.35 | 12.0 | 18 | 0.00 | 0.0 | -98.1 | 26.9 | -32.2 | 10.1 |
| Agarwal Fortune | 19.89 | 113.8 | 7 | 0.00 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | -81.8 | 11.2 |
| Median | 306.83 | 20.2 | 904 | 0.00 | 8.3 | 78.7 | 112.4 | 32.8 | 20.8 |
Competes with: Borosil Scientific Limited, Sejal Glass Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 355 | 402 | 330 | 283 | 371 | 373 | 361 | 374 | 347 | 379 | 390 | 440 | 406 |
| Expenses | 328 | 369 | 310 | 309 | 349 | 344 | 372 | 358 | 284 | 260 | 268 | 304 | 279 |
| Material Cost | 89 | 86 | 90 | 85 | 85 | 91 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 55 | 11 | -12 | 4.70 | 29 | -9.13 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0.80 | 2.75 | 0.00 | 1.84 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 44 | 36 | 22 | 24 | 28 | 26 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 170 | 151 | 160 | 150 | 162 | 169 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 26 | 32 | 20 | -26 | 22 | 29 | -10 | 15 | 63 | 118 | 123 | 136 | 127 |
| OPM % | 7.47 | 8.09 | 6.10 | -9.02 | 5.97 | 7.88 | -2.79 | 4.11 | 18 | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 |
| Other Income | 8 | 37 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 15 | 12 | -216 | -6 | 25 | 9 | 15 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -222 | -7.75 | 17 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 9 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| Depreciation | 32 | 31 | 35 | 34 | 34 | 33 | 32 | 36 | 30 | 22 | 22 | 21 | 22 |
| Profit before tax | -7 | 29 | -18 | -57 | -16 | -8 | -32 | -18 | -187 | 87 | 122 | 120 | 118 |
| Tax % | 71 | -4 | -13 | -7 | -9 | 58 | -6 | 60 | 9 | 29 | 18 | -41 | 27 |
| Net Profit | -12 | 30 | -16 | -53 | -14 | -13 | -30 | -30 | -203 | 62 | 100 | 169 | 87 |
| EPS in Rs | -0.64 | 1.92 | -1.19 | -3.68 | -0.99 | -0.75 | -2.05 | -1.52 | -13 | 1.98 | 7.14 | 12 | 6.19 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -1.53 | -13 | 1.97 | 7.15 | 12 | 6.19 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 156 | 325 | 415 | 557 | 633 | 762 | 891 | 1,371 | 1,479 | 1,556 | 1,615 |
| Expenses | 146 | 296 | 368 | 495 | 541 | 653 | 748 | 1,313 | 1,418 | 1,115 | 1,110 |
| Material Cost | 391 | 345 | |||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 37 | 32 | |||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 3.56 | |||||||||
| Employee Cost | 210 | 111 | |||||||||
| Other Expenses | 784 | 623 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 9 | 30 | 46 | 62 | 92 | 109 | 143 | 58 | 58 | 440 | 504 |
| OPM % | 6 | 9 | 11 | 11 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 4.20 | 3.90 | 28 | 31 |
| Other Income | 36 | 56 | 14 | 135 | 28 | 34 | 19 | 50 | 34 | -188 | 42 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -213 | |||||||||
| Interest | 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 29 | 32 | 14 | 12 |
| Depreciation | 4 | 18 | 21 | 32 | 37 | 45 | 54 | 132 | 135 | 95 | 87 |
| Profit before tax | 41 | 65 | 36 | 156 | 76 | 92 | 101 | -53 | -74 | 142 | 447 |
| Tax % | 11 | 23 | 18 | 12 | 35 | 35 | 30 | -5 | 17 | 11 | |
| Net Profit | 39 | 51 | 29 | 137 | 49 | 60 | 71 | -50 | -87 | 127 | 418 |
| EPS in Rs | 3.27 | 4.12 | 2.68 | 14 | 4.89 | 5.90 | 5.34 | -3.59 | -5.25 | 9.21 | 27 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -5.32 | 9.46 | |||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 15 | 15 | 23 | 5 | 13 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 14%
- 5 years
- 20%
- 3 years
- 20%
- TTM
- 11%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 24%
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 68%
- TTM
- 751%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 27%
- 5 years
- 6%
- 3 years
- 0%
- 1 year
- -27%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 5%
- Last year
- 26%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 14 |
| Reserves | 656 | 695 | 615 | 763 | 814 | 839 | 906 | 860 | 984 | 1,497 |
| Borrowings | 1 | 34 | 100 | 67 | 50 | 114 | 421 | 576 | 252 | 162 |
| Other Liabilities | 33 | 85 | 114 | 156 | 199 | 227 | 292 | 235 | 205 | 152 |
| Minority Interest | 2.29 | -1.21 | ||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 693 | 817 | 832 | 989 | 1,065 | 1,189 | 1,632 | 1,684 | 1,454 | 1,825 |
| Fixed Assets | 173 | 264 | 334 | 308 | 383 | 377 | 977 | 928 | 777 | 614 |
| CWIP | 6 | 8 | 8 | 43 | 16 | 137 | 70 | 126 | 135 | 108 |
| Investments | 381 | 341 | 226 | 264 | 350 | 230 | 11 | 12 | 50 | 606 |
| Other Assets | 134 | 203 | 264 | 374 | 317 | 444 | 574 | 618 | 493 | 497 |
| Total Assets | 693 | 817 | 832 | 989 | 1,065 | 1,189 | 1,632 | 1,684 | 1,454 | 1,825 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 1 | 24 | 32 | 43 | 103 | -25 | -6 | 69 | 100 | 423 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 8 | -3 | 162 | 20 | -67 | -26 | -116 | -215 | -142 | -738 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -8 | -22 | -193 | -64 | -31 | 40 | 238 | 168 | -53 | 323 |
| Net Cash Flow | 1 | -1 | 2 | -1 | 6 | -10 | 115 | 21 | -95 | 8 |
| Free Cash Flow | -71 | 58 | 11 | 54 | 87 | -212 | -353 | -148 | -8 | 226 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2014 | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 68 | 59 | 68 | 61 | 71 | 55 | 38 | 33 | 32 | 28 |
| Inventory Days | 123 | 153 | 169 | 168 | 137 | 265 | 617 | 247 | 203 | 115 |
| Days Payable | 23 | 52 | 57 | 65 | 96 | 76 | 208 | 84 | 61 | 48 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 168 | 160 | 180 | 165 | 111 | 245 | 447 | 196 | 174 | 96 |
| Working Capital Days | 136 | 80 | 58 | 89 | 62 | 69 | 42 | 28 | 34 | 17 |
| ROCE % | 6 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 10 | -4 | -4 | 25 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
exports as % of revenue
5.40
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-493inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
volume growth %
8.00pct
2026-06-30
News
News and filings about BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED. Open one to see why it matters.
22 Sept, 16:09 IST · Company event · medium impact
BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED — Update on Capacity expansion
14 Aug, 17:27 IST · Company event · medium impact
BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED — allotment of 5338840 Equity Shares upon conversion of Warrants allotted on Preferential Basis on August 14 2026
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- dolomite / limestone
- natural gas / RLNG
- silica sand / low-iron sand
- soda ash
Depends on the price of
- Natural gas
- soda_ash
Sells to
- Adani Solar · low-iron textured solar glass for PV modules
- Premier Energies Limited · low-iron textured solar glass for PV modules
- Tata Power Company · solar glass for PV modules (Tata Power Solar)
- Vikram Solar Limited · low-iron textured solar glass for PV modules
- Waaree Energies Limited · low-iron textured solar glass for PV modules
Buys from
- Clean Max Enviro Energy Solutions Limited · Renewable electricity from 185 MW Kalavad wind-solar hybrid project
- GHCL Limited · soda ash (solar glass)
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Capital Goods
- Industry
- Glass - Industrial
- Classification
- Capital Goods › Glass - Industrial
- ISIN
- INE666D01022
Plants
- Borosil Renewables Bharuch solar glass plant
- GMB Glasmanufaktur Brandenburg solar glass plant
News impact
Big market events that reach BOROSIL RENEWABLES LIMITED, and how the effect spreads.
29 Sept, 11:33 IST · Market event · high impact
Vikram Solar shares rise 3% after securing 400 MW module order from leading EPC company
Vikram Solar won a 400 MW solar module order for Maharashtra farm-power projects, helping Vikram and its glass supplier while rival module makers see only sentiment support and power buyers see no direct gain.
Who it hits first
- Vikram Solar, the solar panel maker, won a 400 MW order to supply high-power 620 Wp panels from October 2026 to March 2027 for farm-feeder solar projects in Maharashtra.
- The order adds near-term sales visibility and filled factory time, which is why its shares rose about 3% on the news.
- Rival panel makers did not win this order, so they get only a sentiment lift from proof that decentralised solar demand is strong.
Who may gain
- Vikram Solar, the module maker, which books the 400 MW sale
- Borosil Renewables, the solar glass supplier upstream of module makers
- The unnamed EPC buyer and Maharashtra farm-feeder projects, which secure panel supply
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, the EPC company and Maharashtra farm-feeder projects gain secure panel supply for decentralised plants, while large power owners like NTPC and Adani Green see no direct flow since they did not place this order.
Upstream
Upstream, input sellers like Borosil Renewables, the solar glass maker, benefit because each panel needs glass, so a 400 MW build raises glass pull-through over October to March.
Where demand moves
Business
Real business demand flows to Vikram Solar as 400 MW of panels to build and ship over six months; a smaller pull flows upstream to glass and component suppliers as Vikram buys inputs to fill the order.
Capital
Investor money chased the winner first, lifting Vikram Solar about 3%, with lighter sympathy buying in listed solar peers on stronger demand hopes rather than new sales.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Solar equipment makers enjoy stronger demand mood, but only Vikram books sales, so peers see sentiment not earnings.
Power
Power developers see smoother farm-solar execution in Maharashtra, with no tariff or capacity change, so the lift is mild.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- 400 MW module order → Capital Goods order books strengthen
- Module supply Oct-Mar → Power farm-feeder solar build advances in Maharashtra
- Distributed solar adds up → lower daytime farm-grid load, mild relief for Oil & Gas peaking
Pattern name
Govt Capex Cascade
Patterns
- Govt Capex Cascade
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Banking
- Cement
- Infrastructure
- Oil & Gas
- Steel
When it plays out
Immediate
Vikram shares hold gains and trading stays active as the 400 MW win is digested; peers drift with sentiment.
Medium term
Panel shipments through March 2027 turn into sales and cash; repeat orders would extend the benefit.
Short term
Focus shifts to execution start in October and any follow-on EPC orders in the farm-feeder pipeline.
23 Sept, 22:12 IST · Market event · high impact
Waaree Energies board approves Indosolar merger; public shareholders to get 1 share for every 11
Waaree Energies will absorb Indosolar to cut costs, helping its own holders and suppliers while squeezing smaller solar rivals.
Who it hits first
- Waaree Energies, the large solar panel maker, will absorb its Indosolar unit after its board approved the merger.
- Public holders of Indosolar get 1 Waaree Energies share for every 11 Indosolar shares they own.
- The company says the deal will cut duplicate paperwork, legal and compliance costs and let it use its money better.
Who may gain
- Waaree Energies holders gain from lower overhead and simpler accounts over time.
- Indosolar minority holders get shares in a larger, listed solar maker instead of a small unit.
- Borosil Renewables, which supplies solar glass to Waaree, could see steadier orders as capital is used better.
- Waaree Renewable Technologies, the group solar project arm, gains from a simpler group structure.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, power buyers like Tata Power, Adani Power, NTPC and Adani Green buy Waaree modules, but the pack states no change to supply terms or prices, so they see no direct gain or loss.
Upstream
Upstream, Borosil Renewables supplies solar glass to Waaree Energies, so steadier, better-funded module output helps it; other parts makers see no stated order change.
Where demand moves
Business
No new solar orders are created; the business gain is lower internal costs and steadier module output, which helps Waaree keep prices keen and supports its glass supplier.
Capital
Money should drift toward Waaree Energies and the swap-linked Indosolar line as the 1-for-11 exchange becomes clear, with a small sympathy bid for the group project arm; rival solar makers may see mild selling as Waaree gets leaner.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Solar equipment makers face a leaner leader, squeezing smaller module rivals while helping the glass supplier.
Power
Power producers and green developers see no supply shock, only steadier module supply over time.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Waaree-Indosolar merger → lower solar overhead
- Lower overhead → steadier module supply for Power developers
- Steadier supply → stable solar project costs, small support for energy transition spend
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Patterns
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Oil & Gas
When it plays out
Immediate
Waaree and Indosolar lines adjust to the 1-for-11 swap talk; rivals drift flat to soft.
Medium term
Cost savings and simpler compliance show up if the merger clears approvals and integrates cleanly.
Short term
Swap arithmetic settles; supplier and group arm see small sympathy moves if approvals progress.
13 Sept, 04:28 IST · Market event · high impact
US finalizes steep duties on solar imports from India, Indonesia, Laos
America has locked in steep import taxes on Indian solar panels, so Indian solar makers selling to the US earn less while US-based plants and domestic orders matter more.
Who it hits first
- Waaree Energies (WAAREEENER): biggest US-exposed module maker faces higher landed prices in its key export market
- Premier Energies (PREMIERENE): US growth pillar taxed; leveraged balance sheet limits cushion
- Vikram Solar (VIKRAMSOLR): export hit softened by cheaper valuation and clean cash
Who may gain
- US-based manufacturers (including Waaree's Texas plant); domestic-order-focused players; import-competing US petitioners
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US developers pay more for panels near term; Indian developers unaffected, still buying domestic supply.
Upstream
Solar-glass (Borosil Renewables) and cell suppliers see softer export-linked pull at the margin.
Where demand moves
Business
US buyers shift orders from taxed Indian panels toward US-made and non-targeted-country supply; Indian makers redirect to domestic DCR and non-US export markets.
Capital
Growth multiples compress on exporters; money rotates to domestic-capex plays within Capital Goods.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
solar exporters derate 2-5%; domestic power-equipment makers unaffected
When it plays out
Immediate
Solar stocks drop 2-5% on growth reset; analysts cut US contribution
Medium term
US-plant expansions (Waaree Texas) and supply-chain shifts re-route trade
Short term
Order-cancellation watch; domestic DCR pipeline decides backfill
22 Aug, 04:30 IST · Market event · medium impact
India plans a capex-subsidy scheme for polysilicon, targeting at least 30 GW of capacity by 2030 at about Rs 850 crore per GW - the missing first link in the domestic solar chain
India wants to make the raw purified silicon that solar panels start from, instead of importing it, and will pay part of the factory cost - which over years helps Indian panel makers become self-sufficient but does nothing for their earnings yet.
Who it hits first
- Waaree Energies and Premier Energies are the two listed companies with a credible route to building polysilicon capacity, since both already run downstream cell and module plants and have announced upstream integration ambitions.
- No listed Indian company makes polysilicon today, so the scheme does not reward an existing business - it funds one that does not yet exist.
- Chinese polysilicon exporters, who currently supply essentially all of India's requirement, are the intended loser over the second half of this decade.
- The immediate financial impact on every listed name is zero, because no subsidy amount has been set and no plant has been sanctioned.
Who may gain
- Industrial-gas, specialty-chemical and effluent-treatment suppliers, because polysilicon production consumes large volumes of chlorine chemistry, high-purity gases and water treatment.
- Engineering and construction contractors, since Rs 850 crore per GW across 30 GW implies roughly Rs 25,500 crore of plant construction.
- Quartz and metallurgical-grade silicon miners, which supply the raw feedstock the chain begins with.
- Project lenders and infrastructure financiers, who would fund the debt portion of that Rs 25,500 crore build-out.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Solar cell and module makers, then engineering and construction firms building plants, then the power producers who own them. Each step down gets a smaller and later benefit: the module maker gains supply security, the plant builder gains a lower bill of materials, and the power producer gains a marginally lower tariff - all from roughly 2028 onward.
Upstream
Quartz and metallurgical-grade silicon become the binding raw materials, and India has domestic quartz reserves but almost no metallurgical-grade silicon capacity - which is precisely why the Secretary's Rs 850 crore per GW figure covers both the polysilicon plant and the metallurgical-grade silicon step. Chlorine and high-purity industrial gas suppliers, and water and effluent-treatment providers, become critical inputs.
Where demand moves
Business
Demand is created at a link in the chain that does not exist in India today. If the plants get built, module makers such as Waaree and Premier Energies replace imported polysilicon with domestic supply, which shifts purchase orders from Chinese exporters to Indian producers. That in turn creates upstream demand for quartz, metallurgical-grade silicon, chlorine chemistry and high-purity gases. None of this flow starts until a scheme is approved and plants are commissioned, which on a 2030 target means orders from roughly 2027-28.
Capital
Capital rotates toward the integrated solar manufacturers and away from pure module assemblers. An investor reading this correctly buys the companies that can plausibly build upstream - Waaree at a PE of 19.09 and Premier Energies at 28.69, both below the Capital Goods sector median PE of 32.21 - and avoids paying up for anyone whose only business is buying imported cells and framing them. The risk is that the market buys the whole solar basket indiscriminately on the headline, which is what the April 2024 ALMM precedent suggests happens and then unwinds.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Solar manufacturers with upstream ambitions get a route to full integration they could not previously afford.
Chemicals
Chlorine chemistry, high-purity gases and effluent treatment become required inputs at industrial scale.
Power
Long-run module supply security lowers project risk for solar developers, though not before the end of the decade.
codex additions
- Non-Ferrous Metals / Aluminium
- Cement & Building Materials
- Logistics & Ports
- Engineering, Construction & Infrastructure EPC
- Electrical Equipment & Grid Infrastructure
- Mining & Minerals
- Water & Waste Management
- Banks & Infrastructure Finance
- Specialty Manufacturing Consumables / Packaging
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- India funds domestic polysilicon capacity to close the solar supply chain
- Module makers integrate backwards and cut import dependence on China
- Quartz, metallurgical silicon, chlorine chemistry and industrial gas demand builds
- Solar project module costs fall from the late 2020s
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Capital Goods
- Power
- Chemicals
When it plays out
Immediate
Little. This is a secretary-level statement with no subsidy amount attached, and on the April 2024 ALMM precedent the listed solar names moved -0.43% and +0.20% on day one.
Medium term
Over one to six months watch for a notified scheme and for the first company to announce a polysilicon plant. On a 2030 capacity target, land acquisition and orders would need to start in 2027, so any credible announcement before then would be the genuine signal.
Short term
Over one to four weeks the market will look for the cabinet note and the subsidy quantum. Until a number exists, any rally is sentiment. The ALMM precedent had Borosil Renewables down 0.54% and Sterling and Wilson down 5.38% over exactly this window.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Polysilicon and broader solar manufacturing expansion raises demand for aluminium frames, module mounting structures, conductors and renewable-grid hardware; domestic solar scale-up can support upstream aluminium volumes.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["HINDALCO","NATIONALUM","VEDL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on actual capacity ordering and whether module makers localize frame and structural sourcing. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Non-Ferrous Metals / Aluminium","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"New polysilicon and integrated solar manufacturing facilities require industrial construction, foundations, utilities, worker housing and associated infrastructure, lifting demand for cement and building materials near project clusters.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","AMBUJACEM","SHREECEM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely diffuse unless large plants are concentrated in specific states. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cement \u0026 Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Polysilicon plants import or move quartz, metallurgical-grade silicon inputs, equipment, industrial chemicals and later ship wafers/cells/modules; higher domestic solar manufacturing increases bulk and container logistics intensity.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Ports benefit more if key inputs or machinery remain import-linked during ramp-up. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Logistics \u0026 Ports","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large upstream solar manufacturing plants require civil EPC, utilities, cleanroom-style industrial facilities, water systems, captive power and grid evacuation infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","KEC","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Separate from solar project EPC; this is factory and enabling-infrastructure EPC. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Engineering, Construction \u0026 Infrastructure EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cheaper and more secure domestic module supply can accelerate solar project execution, increasing demand for transformers, cables, switchgear, inverters, substations and transmission upgrades.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SIEMENS","ABB","CGPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Grid bottlenecks can make this a stronger second-order beneficiary than module manufacturing itself. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Electrical Equipment \u0026 Grid Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Polysilicon manufacturing begins with quartz/silica and metallurgical-grade silicon feedstock; policy support can increase domestic interest in silica mining, beneficiation and mineral processing chains.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["MOIL","NMDC","ASHAPURMIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Ticker linkage is imperfect because listed pure-play silica exposure is limited in India. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Mining \u0026 Minerals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Polysilicon production is water- and effluent-treatment intensive, involving acid handling, wastewater treatment, recycling and environmental compliance systems.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VAWATER","IONEXCHANG","WABAG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Could become medium if scheme mandates domestic plants with strict recycling or zero-liquid-discharge requirements. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Water \u0026 Waste Management","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rs 850 crore per GW implies large project debt needs for 30 GW capacity, creating lending, underwriting and working-capital opportunities for banks and renewable-focused financiers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","IREDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Credit risk depends on subsidy clarity, offtake contracts and global polysilicon price cycles. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Banks \u0026 Infrastructure Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Domestic wafer-cell-module scale-up raises demand for EVA films, backsheets, junction boxes, packaging films and related manufacturing consumables around the solar value chain.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SUPREMEIND","UFLEX","JINDALPOLY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefits are indirect and depend on localization of the broader module bill of materials. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Specialty Manufacturing Consumables / Packaging","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
8 Aug, 04:32 IST · Market event · high impact
Trump signs Section 232 proclamation putting a 15% tariff and minimum import prices on polysilicon, wafers, solar cells and modules from any country - Indian exporters not exempted
America will charge a 15% tax and enforce a minimum selling price on every imported solar panel and cell from December, whoever makes them - which raises the cost for Indian solar exporters like Vikram Solar and Waaree, though it also strips away the price advantage their Chinese rivals had.
Who it hits first
- Vikram Solar and Saatvik Green Energy assemble modules from bought-in cells, so they pay the $0.22 per watt cell floor on the way in and face the $0.38 per watt module floor on the way out - the worst structural position
- Waaree Energies, India's largest module exporter to the US, sees its India-made cells and modules become dearer to land there
- EMMVEE and Webel Solar, smaller module makers with US export exposure, face the same landed-cost step-up with less balance-sheet room
Who may gain
- Premier Energies, which makes its own cells as well as modules and therefore does not have to buy cells across the tariff line
- Waaree Energies again on the other side of the trade - it assembles panels inside the United States, which is exactly what this rule is designed to reward
- Indian makers relative to Chinese and South-East Asian rivals, because the floor price applies to every origin and so removes the cheapest competitors' price advantage
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US solar developers and utilities face higher panel prices, which slows US project pipelines and lowers total import volume - so Indian exporters lose on price and on volume together. Indian developers gain, because modules that can no longer clear the US floor get sold domestically at softer prices, lowering the capital cost of Indian solar farms.
Upstream
Polysilicon and wafer suppliers to Indian cell makers face a redirected market: polysilicon itself is exempt from the 15% tariff, so raw polysilicon can still move freely, but wafers cannot. That tilts the economics toward doing more ingot and wafer conversion inside India or inside the US. Solar-glass, aluminium-frame, encapsulant and junction-box suppliers to Indian module makers see order softness if US-bound volumes shrink - the channel by which Borosil Renewables is affected without being tariffed itself.
Where demand moves
Business
Every imported solar product entering the US must now clear a price floor roughly three times the current world module price. That destroys the low-cost import channel for everyone at once - Chinese, South-East Asian and Indian alike. Demand therefore shifts toward US-domiciled cell and module assembly, which is precisely the intent. Indian makers with US plants (Waaree) capture part of that shift; pure Indian exporters (Vikram Solar, Saatvik, EMMVEE) lose volume. Displaced Indian module output is redirected to the domestic Indian market and to Europe, which softens domestic module prices and pressures margins at home too.
Capital
Money rotates within Indian solar from pure exporters toward integrated cell-plus-module makers and toward names with US manufacturing footprints. Today's tape shows exactly that split - Vikram Solar fell 5.53% while Waaree rose 2.11% and Webel Solar rose 2.96% - so the market is already discriminating between the two business models rather than selling the sector wholesale.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Indian module and cell makers face a higher landed cost in their largest export market from December 2026
Power
Domestic Indian solar developers benefit from cheaper modules redirected from the US market
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- US Section 232 tariff and minimum import price on all polysilicon-derived solar products
- Imported panel prices in the US rise roughly threefold against the world reference
- US project pipelines slow and import volumes shrink
- Indian pure module assemblers lose the US channel
- Integrated cell-plus-module makers and US-footprint assemblers gain relative share
- Displaced Indian module output redirects domestically, softening Indian module prices
- Indian solar developers gain from cheaper modules
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade (trade-barrier variant)
Sectors queried
- Capital Goods
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
Split reaction already visible - Vikram Solar -5.5%, EMMVEE -2.8%, Saatvik -0.9%, while Waaree +2.1%, Webel +3.0% and Premier +0.5%. The market is separating integrated and US-footprint names from pure exporters
Medium term
The floor prices only bite from 4 December 2026, giving four months of pull-forward shipments. Beyond that, expect Indian exporters to accelerate US assembly plans and to redirect volume domestically, and expect Indian module prices to soften as that volume comes home
Short term
Over one to four weeks watch for clarification of the rule's scope - pv-tech reports Section 232 polysilicon tariffs could be clarified 'by end of the month', and the details of how the minimum import price is enforced matter more than the 15% headline
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 6 Mar 2020 | demerger | ₹0 |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Dec 2019 | unspecified | ₹0.65 |
| 2 Aug 2018 | bonus | ₹0 |
| 11 Jul 2018 | unspecified | ₹2.5 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 6), 2020-02-01..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 1 Feb 2020
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2630 Jul 2026
- Earnings call17 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.