The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited
NSE: GESHIPShipping
Share price
₹1,529.70
-2.44% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
67
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹21,875 Cr
P/E ratio
5.8
P/B ratio
1.3
ROCE
15.8%
ROE
15.9%
Dividend yield
2.2%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 23.9% over the past year, and 4.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 46.0% to 61.3% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 4.0% a year against a sector median of 9.8% — 5.8 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 5.8× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 15.3×, across 3 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 6.5×, the 36th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited — this one | 0%/yr | 5.8× | — |
| Shipping Corporation Of India Limited | 15%/yr | 8.1× | ₹0.54 |
| Shreeji Shipping Global Limited | 10%/yr | 81.7× | ₹8.2 |
| Seamec Limited | 105%/yr | 15.3× | — |
| TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES LIMITED | — | — | — |
| Essar Shipping Limited | -20%/yr | — | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Shipping), it ranks 3 of 6 on returns, 4 of 5 on growth, 1 of 6 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 15.8% on capital, ahead of 50% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹12607 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹2799 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹7856 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 156 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being paid 55 days before it paid its own suppliers to waiting 33 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
7 of 9 checks clear · 78%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Reported its most profitable quarter while keeping capacity growth selective and mostly spot-linked.
Announced 3 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹2,005 Cr
Net profit
₹1,309 Cr
EPS
₹91.68
Earnings call transcript · 4 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹21,875 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹1,529.70
- 52w High
- ₹1,798
- 52w Low
- ₹1,003
- Enterprise value
- ₹17,413 Cr
- Beta
- 0.8
- Price CAGR 1y
- 51.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 23.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 34.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 15.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 15.1%
- PEG ratio
- —
- P/E ratio
- 5.8
- P/B ratio
- 1.3
- EV / EBITDA
- 7.3
- Industry P/E
- 19.9
- ROCE
- 15.8%
- ROCE 5y average
- 15.4%
- ROE
- 15.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.1
- Interest coverage
- 23.3
- Dividend yield
- 2.2%
- ROE 3y average
- 17.0%
- ROE last year
- 16.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹5,409 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹2,943 Cr
- Operating margin
- 58.0%
- Net profit margin
- 54.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 58.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- -1.7%
- Sales growth 5y
- 10.1%
- Profit growth 3y
- 0.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 24.0%
- EPS
- ₹206
- Sales growth TTM
- 24.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 126.0%
- Dividend payout
- 17.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹2,005 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹1,309 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 66.9%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 159.7%
- OPM latest quarter
- 66.7%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹1,186
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹1,087 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹5,511 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹1,087 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 117.6
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹2,854 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹1,276 Cr
- FCF yield
- 5.2%
- Net cash flow
- ₹225 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 30.1%
- FII holding
- 31.0%
- DII holding
- 12.8%
- Public holding
- 26.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Shipping Co | 1,567.90 | 6.0 | 22,384 | 2.24 | 1,308.8 | 159.4 | 2,005.4 | 66.9 | 15.8 |
| S C I | 285.35 | 8.2 | 13,292 | 2.63 | 619.3 | 74.9 | 1,846.6 | 40.3 | 13.9 |
| Shreeji Ship. Gl | 802.10 | 81.8 | 13,068 | 0.12 | 44.3 | 19.1 | 208.9 | 29.6 | 27.9 |
| SEAMEC Ltd | 1,610.90 | 15.9 | 4,096 | 0.12 | 81.3 | 7.2 | 296.9 | 40.8 | 19.7 |
| ABS Marine | 324.35 | 10.1 | 796 | 0.00 | 49.5 | 154.9 | 183.1 | 83.5 | 20.7 |
| Essar Shipping | 16.66 | 345 | 0.00 | 230.4 | -200.9 | 0.0 | -97.6 | ||
| Transworld Shipp | 155.05 | 340 | 0.00 | 29.5 | 427.9 | 102.5 | -25.9 | -4.5 | |
| Median | 285.35 | 11.2 | 796 | 0.00 | 49.5 | 61.5 | 183.1 | 40.5 | 14.9 |
Competes with: Essar Shipping Limited, Seamec Limited, Shipping Corporation Of India Limited, Shreeji Shipping Global Limited, TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES LIMITED
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,284 | 1,229 | 1,245 | 1,497 | 1,508 | 1,354 | 1,237 | 1,223 | 1,201 | 1,242 | 1,454 | 1,511 | 2,005 |
| Expenses | 492 | 586 | 595 | 561 | 597 | 701 | 626 | 721 | 559 | 514 | 619 | 570 | 668 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 228 | 221 | 215 | 246 | 250 | 260 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 493 | 338 | 299 | 372 | 320 | 408 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 792 | 643 | 650 | 937 | 911 | 654 | 611 | 502 | 643 | 728 | 836 | 941 | 1,338 |
| OPM % | 62 | 52 | 52 | 63 | 60 | 48 | 49 | 41 | 54 | 59 | 57 | 62 | 67 |
| Other Income | 51 | 232 | 151 | 229 | 195 | 225 | 264 | 150 | 135 | 140 | 282 | 346 | 281 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 62 | 77 | 67 | 59 | 61 | 64 | 61 | 51 | 45 | 44 | 25 | 23 | 20 |
| Depreciation | 180 | 187 | 194 | 166 | 197 | 206 | 205 | 205 | 197 | 224 | 246 | 222 | 234 |
| Profit before tax | 601 | 612 | 540 | 942 | 848 | 610 | 608 | 396 | 536 | 601 | 847 | 1,043 | 1,365 |
| Tax % | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 4 | -0 | 4 |
| Net Profit | 576 | 595 | 538 | 905 | 812 | 576 | 594 | 363 | 504 | 581 | 813 | 1,044 | 1,309 |
| EPS in Rs | 40 | 42 | 38 | 63 | 57 | 40 | 42 | 25 | 35 | 41 | 57 | 73 | 92 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 25 | 35 | 41 | 57 | 73 | 91 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 3,438 | 3,808 | 3,117 | 3,038 | 3,547 | 3,687 | 3,337 | 3,509 | 5,690 | 5,255 | 5,323 | 5,409 | 6,213 |
| Expenses | 2,005 | 1,823 | 1,686 | 1,838 | 2,480 | 2,470 | 1,683 | 1,969 | 2,563 | 2,234 | 2,646 | 2,261 | 2,370 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 944 | 932 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 1,701 | 1,329 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 1,433 | 1,985 | 1,431 | 1,200 | 1,067 | 1,217 | 1,653 | 1,540 | 3,128 | 3,022 | 2,677 | 3,148 | 3,843 |
| OPM % | 42 | 52 | 46 | 40 | 30 | 33 | 50 | 44 | 55 | 58 | 50 | 58 | 62 |
| Other Income | 276 | 119 | 506 | 102 | 269 | 211 | 232 | 148 | 481 | 664 | 834 | 903 | 1,049 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 301 | 288 | 378 | 455 | 521 | 450 | 242 | 370 | 343 | 265 | 236 | 136 | 111 |
| Depreciation | 610 | 608 | 678 | 769 | 773 | 743 | 700 | 698 | 712 | 726 | 813 | 889 | 926 |
| Profit before tax | 798 | 1,208 | 882 | 79 | 42 | 235 | 943 | 620 | 2,554 | 2,694 | 2,462 | 3,026 | 3,855 |
| Tax % | 6 | 9 | 14 | 367 | 151 | 12 | 3 | -2 | -1 | 3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Net Profit | 748 | 1,097 | 755 | -210 | -21 | 207 | 919 | 630 | 2,575 | 2,614 | 2,344 | 2,943 | 3,747 |
| EPS in Rs | 50 | 73 | 50 | -14 | -1.42 | 14 | 63 | 44 | 180 | 183 | 164 | 206 | 262 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 164 | 206 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 22 | 19 | 20 | -52 | -380 | 57 | 14 | 22 | 16 | 20 | 18 | 17 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 4%
- 5 years
- 10%
- 3 years
- -2%
- TTM
- 24%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 10%
- 5 years
- 24%
- 3 years
- 0%
- TTM
- 126%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 15%
- 5 years
- 34%
- 3 years
- 23%
- 1 year
- 51%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 12%
- 5 years
- 17%
- 3 years
- 17%
- Last year
- 16%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 151 | 151 | 151 | 151 | 151 | 147 | 147 | 143 | 143 | 143 | 143 | 143 |
| Reserves | 7,280 | 6,413 | 7,073 | 6,777 | 6,659 | 6,649 | 7,557 | 7,909 | 10,133 | 12,255 | 14,116 | 16,820 |
| Borrowings | 6,540 | 5,759 | 6,816 | 6,213 | 5,999 | 5,295 | 5,047 | 4,655 | 3,649 | 3,048 | 2,163 | 1,087 |
| Other Liabilities | 1,565 | 1,610 | 1,363 | 1,523 | 1,562 | 1,742 | 1,394 | 1,262 | 1,284 | 1,362 | 1,233 | 1,411 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 15,535 | 13,933 | 15,402 | 14,664 | 14,370 | 13,833 | 14,145 | 13,969 | 15,209 | 16,808 | 17,656 | 19,460 |
| Fixed Assets | 10,888 | 8,925 | 10,304 | 9,809 | 9,617 | 9,123 | 9,042 | 8,877 | 8,450 | 8,329 | 8,247 | 9,339 |
| CWIP | 227 | 328 | 22 | 13 | 14 | 123 | 24 | 24 | 35 | 59 | 21 | 46 |
| Investments | 1,250 | 912 | 875 | 856 | 601 | 963 | 1,350 | 1,157 | 1,510 | 1,970 | 2,289 | 2,392 |
| Other Assets | 3,170 | 3,768 | 4,201 | 3,986 | 4,138 | 3,624 | 3,729 | 3,910 | 5,215 | 6,450 | 7,099 | 7,684 |
| Total Assets | 15,535 | 13,933 | 15,402 | 14,664 | 14,370 | 13,833 | 14,145 | 13,969 | 15,209 | 16,808 | 17,656 | 19,460 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 1,445 | 2,151 | 1,522 | 969 | 1,096 | 1,481 | 1,534 | 1,323 | 2,975 | 2,808 | 2,647 | 2,854 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -725 | -440 | -1,548 | -412 | 429 | 622 | -882 | -337 | 39 | -868 | -148 | -860 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -228 | -1,677 | 713 | -1,158 | -1,020 | -1,872 | -505 | -1,189 | -1,893 | -1,330 | -1,675 | -1,769 |
| Net Cash Flow | 491 | 34 | 687 | -602 | 505 | 230 | 147 | -203 | 1,120 | 610 | 824 | 225 |
| Free Cash Flow | 210 | 1,588 | -389 | 498 | 481 | 1,385 | 1,013 | 911 | 2,776 | 2,373 | 2,472 | 1,276 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 36 | 30 | 24 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 30 | 33 | 37 | 45 | 33 | 43 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 36 | 30 | 24 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 30 | 33 | 37 | 45 | 33 | 43 |
| Working Capital Days | -211 | -161 | -207 | -163 | -132 | -36 | -67 | -55 | -16 | -16 | -21 | 33 |
| ROCE % | 8 | 11 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 21 | 19 | 14 | 16 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
15,77,17,241inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Lubricants, engine spares, paints, chemicals and general ship stores
Depends on the price of
- fuel
Buys from
- Bharat Wire Ropes Limited · Marine wire ropes for offshore & shipping
Sells to
- Oil & Natural Gas Corporation · Offshore drilling rigs & offshore support vessels (via subsidiary Greatship India) for E&P
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Services
- Industry
- Shipping
- Classification
- Services › Shipping
- ISIN
- INE017A01032
Business segments
- Shipping · 76%
- Offshore · 24%
News impact
Big market events that reach The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited, and how the effect spreads.
2 Oct, 15:13 IST · Market event · medium impact
Government extends RELIEF scheme to shield exporters from West Asia logistics disruption
The government extended shipping-cost relief for exporters hit by West Asia disruptions, helping exporters and cargo carriers keep volumes steady while taxpayers cover the support cost.
Who it hits first
- The government extended Part II of its RELIEF scheme for exporters through a September 30 notice, so help with high shipping costs continues.
- Exporters sending goods through West Asia routes keep getting support instead of facing the full jump in freight bills alone.
- Cargo carriers, ports and freight handlers keep steadier export volumes because subsidised exporters keep shipping.
Who may gain
- Indian exporters who ship goods through West Asia sea and air routes — their freight bills shrink.
- Cargo shipowners such as the Shipping Corporation of India and the Great Eastern Shipping Company — steadier sailings and charter demand.
- Freight movers such as Transport Corporation of India and Container Corporation of India — fuller trucks and container trains.
- Port operators such as Adani Ports — steadier export cargo passing through their terminals.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Makers of exported goods keep orders moving and overseas buyers keep receiving Indian shipments on time, so the downstream effect is continuity of trade rather than new demand.
Upstream
Steadier sailings support demand for ship fuel, vessel charters, containers and port handling services, though the scheme pays exporters rather than buying these inputs directly.
Where demand moves
Business
Exporters facing lower net freight costs keep booking shipments instead of delaying them, so demand flows from exporters to shipping lines, freight forwarders, rail-container movers and ports as steadier cargo volumes over the next few weeks.
Capital
Investors are likely to favour listed shipping, logistics and port shares on steadier volume hopes, while exporters themselves save working capital that would otherwise sit in freight bills.
How it spreads across sectors
Services
Positive for logistics, shipping and port members as RELIEF keeps export cargo flowing through West Asia routes; IT, staffing and facility-service members see no real spillover.
When it plays out
Immediate
In the next 1-7 days, exporter sentiment steadies and shipping and logistics shares may edge up on hopes of steadier cargo.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months, the benefit lasts only while the extension runs and West Asia disruption persists; if freight rates normalise, the effect fades.
Short term
Over 1-4 weeks, exporters file for relief and keep shipment schedules, showing up as steadier port and freight volumes.
31 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · medium impact
Shipping ministry retains cabotage relaxations for foreign-flag vessels in Indian coastal trade, leaving Indian-flag shipowners facing continued competition
The shipping ministry will keep letting foreign ships carry cargo between Indian ports. Indian shipowners such as Shipping Corporation keep facing cheaper foreign competition, while ports that handle those ships are unaffected or mildly better off.
Who it hits first
- Indian-flag coastal vessel operators - Shipping Corporation of India most directly - keep facing foreign-flag competition on domestic routes and lose the policy relief they had lobbied for.
- Great Eastern Shipping is affected in principle but far less in practice, because most of its fleet earns internationally and from offshore services.
Who may gain
- Cargo owners - refiners, cement makers, steel mills and fertiliser companies moving bulk along the coast - keep access to cheaper foreign tonnage, so their inbound freight cost stays lower.
- Ports and terminal operators are neutral to mildly better off, because they earn per tonne handled regardless of the ship's flag and more vessels are free to call.
- Coastal logistics and multimodal operators benefit from cheaper sea legs when planning road-versus-sea routings.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Bulk cargo owners that move coal, cement, steel, fertiliser and petroleum products along the Indian coast keep paying lower freight than they would under a protected regime, which is a small but persistent cost advantage. Ports and terminal operators handle the same or slightly higher vessel calls, so their throughput is unaffected.
Upstream
Indian shipyards and ship-repair yards lose the second-order order flow that a cabotage rollback would have triggered, since domestic owners have less reason to add Indian-flag tonnage. Indian maritime crewing agencies and marine insurers similarly forgo the volume growth that flag-protected domestic tonnage would have generated.
Where demand moves
Business
Coastal freight demand keeps flowing to whoever quotes cheapest, which under continued relaxation is disproportionately foreign-flag tonnage. Indian shipowners lose the volume they had expected to recapture, so their charter demand and fleet utilisation stay under pressure. Cargo owners - refiners, cement, steel and fertiliser shippers - keep the benefit of lower coastal freight rates, which slightly improves their landed cost. Ports see the same or marginally more cargo either way.
Capital
Money stays away from Indian-flag coastal shipowners, where the policy call removes the catalyst that a re-rating case rested on, and continues to favour port and terminal operators, whose earnings are flag-agnostic and volume-linked. Within shipping, capital prefers internationally-earning fleets such as Great Eastern Shipping over coastal-dependent tonnage.
How it spreads across sectors
Services
Indian-flag coastal shipowners keep losing share to foreign tonnage; ports and cargo owners neutral to positive
When it plays out
Immediate
Minimal price reaction - this is the continuation of an existing policy, and the disappointment is the absence of a change rather than a new negative.
Medium term
Without flag protection, Indian coastal tonnage growth stays slow and domestic owners keep prioritising international routes. The structural loser is the Indian shipbuilding and coastal fleet ambition; the structural winner is landed freight cost for Indian manufacturers.
Short term
Watch for industry-body representations and any partial carve-out for specific cargo types, which is how this policy has been adjusted before.
25 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · high impact
UPDATE: US fires its 'economic D-Day' at Iran - Treasury broadens secondary sanctions to any entity trading with Tehran and warns third countries they will lose dollar access, the rial hits a record low, and yet Brent slips on the day to $93
America has told the whole world to stop doing business with Iran or be cut off from the US dollar, but oil actually dipped because traders had already assumed Iran's barrels were gone - so Indian refiners and plastic, paint and polyester makers still pay a high oil bill, while state-run oil producers and tanker owners collect more.
Who it hits first
- Indian refiners that own no oil fields - Chennai Petroleum above all - pay full price for a $93 barrel while the price they charge lags
- Anyone shipping cargo through the Strait of Hormuz now pays roughly $20 million per voyage in insurance and freight, which lands on Indian importers and exporters
- Indian exporters to Iran - rice, tea, pharmaceuticals and engineering goods - lose a market as Dubai halts re-exports and banks refuse the paperwork
- Plastic, paint, tyre and polyester makers face dearer crude-linked raw materials
Who may gain
- State oil marketing companies BPCL and HPCL, which have historically captured a wider margin between crude they buy at a discount and pump prices that move slowly
- Tanker owners Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India, as war-risk premia and longer routes tighten the supply of usable ships
- Domestic crude producers ONGC and Oil India earn more per barrel, though past sanctions rounds show the government often claws part of that back
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream of the refiners, PVC pipe makers like Apollo Pipes, polyester spinners like Filatex and lubricant blenders like Savita Oil all buy crude-derived inputs and cannot raise their own prices as fast, so the cost stops with them for a quarter or two.
Upstream
Crude and naphtha suppliers keep their volumes but sell at a war premium; shipowners and marine insurers upstream of every cargo raise their price, and the roughly $20 million Hormuz transit cost is passed straight down to Indian refiners and chemical importers.
Where demand moves
Business
Iranian barrels leave the open market, so Indian refiners buy from Saudi, Iraqi, US and Russian sellers who discount to keep the volume; that discount is captured by the refiners rather than by the producers. At the same time exporters who sold rice, tea and medicines into Iran lose those orders outright and must find buyers in Africa and South-East Asia at lower prices.
Capital
Money rotates out of crude-consuming manufacturers - plastics, paints, tyres, polyester - and into the two places that gain from the same barrel: state oil marketing companies and tanker owners. Some also parks in defensive consumer names while the sanctions detail is unclear, which is what dragged the Sensex 172 points lower on the day.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
PVC and polymer costs rise for pipe and fitting makers
Chemicals
Naphtha-linked feedstock costs rise across the specialty chain
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Refiners squeezed on input cost, marketing companies helped by discounted barrels, producers helped on realisation but exposed to subsidy sharing
Services
Tanker charter rates and war-risk insurance both rise, helping shipowners and hurting anyone who charters
Textiles
Polyester feedstock rises with crude, squeezing yarn spinners
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Crude Oil Brent
Note
Brent is 4.46% higher over the ranker's roughly-weekly window but fell on the announcement day itself. Cost-weight percentages are null on every DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge in the graph, so a margin impact in basis points cannot be computed without inventing a number.
Shock type
price
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Brent held near $93 by sanctions
- Refiner input cost up, marketing margin up for OMCs
- Polyester and PVC feedstock up
- Paints, tyres and packaging input cost up
- Freight and marine insurance up ~$20mn per Hormuz cargo
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
- Services
- Textiles
- Chemicals
- Capital Goods
When it plays out
Immediate
Indian shares fell as investors waited for the sanctions text; oil-consuming manufacturers and Chennai Petroleum lead the drop while state oil marketing companies hold up.
Medium term
If Iranian barrels stay off the market, discounts from Saudi, Iraqi and Russian sellers widen and Indian refiners' margins improve structurally - the pattern that produced double-digit gains for BPCL and HPCL after every past sanctions round.
Short term
The detail of which banks, shippers and insurers are named decides whether Indian exporters to Iran are formally shut out; watch tanker charter rates and the Hormuz insurance quote.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Iran/West Asia escalation raises LNG, ammonia, sulphur and freight costs; sanctions also complicate regional procurement and payment routes; subsidy timing may lag cost inflation for urea and complex fertilizer makers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","GNFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant if gas or sulphur prices stay elevated rather than only a one-day crude move.","sector":"Fertilizers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher crude lifts ATF costs; Gulf airspace and insurance risk can lengthen routes or raise operating costs; outbound Middle East traffic may soften if regional risk rises.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","SPICEJET","TAJGVK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"IndiGo is the cleanest listed airline exposure; airport/hotel names are secondary demand exposures.","sector":"Aviation","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude-linked derivatives such as solvents, monomers, titanium dioxide logistics and packaging costs rise; margin pressure appears if companies cannot pass through input inflation quickly.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","BERGEPAINT","PIDILITIND"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Often reacts with a lag as inventory and pricing cycles reset.","sector":"Paints, Adhesives \u0026 Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude-linked synthetic rubber, carbon black and freight costs rise; replacement-demand pricing power may offset part of the pressure but OEM-linked volumes face margin risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["APOLLOTYRE","CEATLTD","JKTYRE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Direction depends on ability to pass through higher raw-material costs.","sector":"Tyres \u0026 Rubber Products","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"India's humanitarian exports to Iran face banking, shipping and Dubai re-export disruption; receivables, route costs and compliance friction rise even where goods are exempt.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CIPLA","SUNPHARMA","DRREDDY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Iran is not usually a dominant revenue market, so this is more compliance/logistics than earnings-wide unless sanctions broaden.","sector":"Pharmaceuticals Exporters","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Iran is a buyer of Indian tea, rice and food items; Dubai re-export halt and payment constraints reduce shipment visibility and raise working-capital risk for exporters.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","MCLEODRUSS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Company impact varies sharply by Iran exposure; rice and tea names are most directly linked.","sector":"Tea, Rice \u0026 Agri Exporters","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Secondary-sanctions risk makes banks more cautious on letters of credit, remittances and dollar clearing involving Iran-linked counterparties; exporter financing and compliance costs rise.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SBIN","BANKBARODA","ICICIBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large banks may avoid losses through conservative compliance, but fee income and exporter credit flows can be disrupted.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Trade Finance","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"UAE is a major re-export and financing hub for precious stones and gold; wider scrutiny of Iran/UAE flows can tighten compliance, insurance and logistics across regional trading channels.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant to trade-flow disruption and gold volatility than direct Iran demand.","sector":"Gems \u0026 Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher LNG, imported coal freight and fuel-oil prices raise variable power costs; discom pass-through and merchant tariffs may move unevenly, creating mixed effects across generators and distributors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","TATAPOWER","JSWENERGY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regulated generators are less exposed; merchant and fuel-import-sensitive assets are more exposed.","sector":"Power Utilities \u0026 Merchant Generators","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · medium impact
Ultra-large container ships return to the Suez Canal - the 17,200-TEU Bangkok Maersk transits on an Italy-Singapore run - shortening Asia-Europe routes for Indian exporters even as Hormuz stays disrupted
The biggest container ships are sailing through the Suez Canal again instead of going the long way round Africa, which cuts about two weeks and some freight cost off shipping Indian clothes, linen and chemicals to Europe - helpful for exporters, unhelpful for shipowners who were paid for the longer trip.
Who it hits first
- Indian exporters shipping to Europe - garments, home textiles, chemicals and engineering goods - pay less per container and get paid sooner, because the goods reach the buyer around two weeks earlier.
- Container shipping lines lose the other side of that trade: a shorter voyage means the same cargo absorbs fewer ship-days, so effective capacity rises and freight rates fall.
Who may gain
- Export-heavy apparel and home-textile makers whose European customers price on landed cost - Pearl Global, KPR Mill, Trident, Welspun Living.
- Container terminals, inland container depots and rail container operators, which handle more boxes per month when sailings speed up.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
European retailers and brands are the end buyers and capture part of the freight saving through renegotiated landed-cost contracts, so Indian exporters will not keep all of it. Container liners and charter owners sit on the losing side, as shorter voyages release effective capacity and soften rates.
Upstream
Yarn and fabric mills, dyeing units and chemical intermediate makers that feed the exporters see steadier order flow, because a shorter shipping cycle lets brands place repeat orders inside the same season rather than committing once a year.
Where demand moves
Business
The same volume of Indian goods now travels a shorter route. Exporters gain because freight is a real line item in a garment's landed cost and a two-week faster delivery lets European buyers reorder within a season. Shipping lines lose, because the industry sells ship-days: when every voyage gets shorter, the same fleet can carry more cargo, so freight rates fall. Container handlers in between gain on throughput.
Capital
Money rotates towards export-facing manufacturers with European exposure and away from container shipowners whose freight rates were being propped up by the longer Cape route. Indian shipowners are a partial exception because Great Eastern Shipping is mostly tankers, whose rates are still being set by the separate Hormuz disruption.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Bulk and specialty chemical exporters to Europe get lower delivered cost and faster working-capital turns.
Pharma
Formulation exporters to the EU see shorter cold-chain and shipping cycles, a modest working-capital benefit on an already air-freight-heavy trade.
Services
Container shipping tonne-mile demand falls as the Cape detour ends, which pressures freight and charter rates; container terminals and rail container operators gain throughput.
Textiles
Freight cost per container to Europe falls and lead times shorten, improving Indian competitiveness against Bangladesh and Vietnam on EU orders.
When it plays out
Immediate
One ship transit is a signal, not a trend. Expect no measurable earnings impact this quarter and only a sentiment nudge for export names.
Medium term
If Suez routing normalises through FY27, Indian exporters to Europe carry a structurally lower landed cost, while container freight rates give back the war-premium they have held since 2024.
Short term
Watch whether major carriers publish Suez-routed Asia-Europe schedules for the next sailing season. That, not a single transit, is what actually resets freight rates.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization reduces Asia-Europe container transit time and freight volatility, improving delivery reliability and landed margins for Indian auto-component exporters supplying European OEMs and aftermarket channels.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BOSCHLTD","UNOMINDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit strongest for exporters with meaningful Europe exposure and containerized shipments.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Shorter India-Europe routing lowers logistics cost for project equipment, industrial components and machinery exports, improving quote competitiveness and execution timelines for export orders.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ABB","SIEMENS","BHEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Draft mentions engineering exporters but not the sector; impact depends on export mix and contract pass-through terms.","sector":"Capital Goods \u0026 Engineering","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower Europe-bound freight friction and faster logistics support export turnaround for finished jewellery and precious-stone shipments, while reduced uncertainty helps inventory planning for seasonal European demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Air freight is important for high-value goods, so ocean-route normalization is a secondary benefit.","sector":"Gems \u0026 Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced transit time to Europe improves cold-chain reliability and lowers spoilage or working-capital risk for containerized food exports, especially frozen seafood and processed agri products.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","VENKEYS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant where Europe is a meaningful export market and reefer-container availability improves.","sector":"Seafood \u0026 Processed Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Return of large vessels through Suez can normalize Asia-Europe schedules, lifting predictability and container handling volumes at Indian ports linked to Europe trade lanes, though fewer Cape-related tonne-miles may reduce some transshipment distortions.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive for throughput and schedule reliability; mixed if freight-rate normalization reduces ancillary congestion-related gains.","sector":"Ports \u0026 Port Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved vessel schedules increase container evacuation predictability from ports to ICDs and manufacturing clusters, supporting rail/container movement and reducing dwell-time disruptions.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","TCI","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Complements CFS/ICD beneficiaries but extends to inland rail and trucking logistics.","sector":"Surface Logistics \u0026 Rail Freight","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cheaper and faster Asia-Europe/Asia-Med container flows can ease imported component availability and shipping costs for electronics and appliance supply chains, while European export channels for finished goods improve modestly.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect because many inputs are Asia-sourced, but global container normalization can still reduce freight premia.","sector":"Consumer Durables \u0026 Electronics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization helps container trade but Hormuz disruption keeps crude and LNG risk premia elevated; refiners and OMCs face margin and working-capital pressure if energy freight or crude prices remain volatile.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"This is a parallel negative ripple from the unresolved Hormuz disruption rather than a Suez beneficiary.","sector":"Oil \u0026 Gas Marketing / Refining","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Hormuz and West Asia disruption can affect feedstock, ammonia, sulphur and energy-linked input costs, while Suez normalization only partly offsets logistics pressure on non-energy cargoes.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","GNFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive freight normalization may be outweighed by gas/feedstock volatility for some producers.","sector":"Fertilisers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
13 Aug, 04:28 IST · Market event · high impact
Ocean freight rates to the US and Europe surge three to four times, with Indian exporters now paying over $9,000 per container
Shipping a container from India to America or Europe now costs over $9,000, three to four times what it did, so Indian exporters of clothes, chemicals and machinery lose price competitiveness, while shipping companies that own the vessels earn much more.
Who it hits first
- Exporters of bulky, low-value-density goods - garments, agrochemicals, essential oils, engineering goods - lose price competitiveness because freight is charged per container regardless of contents
- Working capital cycles stretch as voyages lengthen and payment against delivery gets pushed out by weeks
- Perishable and refrigerated exports such as seafood face the sharpest hit, since longer voyages raise both cost and spoilage risk
Who may gain
- Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge directly - Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India own the vessels earning the higher rates
- Air cargo and express logistics gain share as exporters of high-value, time-sensitive goods switch from sea to air
- Freight forwarders and multimodal operators earn more on routing complexity, though their margin depends on passing carrier surcharges through without losing volume
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream buyers are US and European Union retailers, distributors and formulators. They face higher landed costs and respond by reordering from nearer suppliers or demanding a price concession from the Indian supplier. Ports and container terminals see mixed effects - longer dwell times and transshipment work rise, but underlying export volumes fall.
Upstream
Indian exporters' upstream suppliers - cotton ginners and spinners feeding garment makers, basic chemical producers feeding formulators - lose order volume with a one-to-two-month lag as export orders slow. Container availability at Indian ports is the binding constraint: empty boxes are stranded on longer rotations, so even exporters willing to pay struggle to book space.
Where demand moves
Business
Overseas demand for Indian goods does not disappear - it relocates. Under free-on-board terms the buyer pays the freight, so the buyer sees a higher landed cost for Indian cargo and reorders from suppliers closer to home: Mexico and Eastern Europe for the US and European Union markets, Vietnam and Bangladesh for garments. Indian exporters keep the order only by conceding on price, which is the real margin hit. In the opposite direction, demand flows to whoever owns vessel capacity - carriers and ship owners - and to air cargo for high-value goods that can absorb the airfreight premium.
Capital
Money rotates out of export-dependent manufacturers - textiles, agrochemicals, engineering goods, seafood - and into the asset owners who capture the surcharge: Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India. Some also rotates into domestic-demand businesses that have no export exposure at all, since this is a purely trade-side shock.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Agrochemical and pigment exporters face freight that is a large share of delivered price on high-volume cargo
Pharma
Least affected of the exporters - formulations are high value per container, so freight is a small share of the invoice
Services
Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge; freight forwarders gain routing work
Textiles
Garment exports lose landed-cost competitiveness against Vietnam and Bangladesh just as US tariff pressure had begun to ease
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
fuel
Note
Freight itself is not a tracked Commodity node. What is tracked, and what matters here, is bunker fuel: ship owners capture the freight surcharge but pay 11.41 percent more for fuel than a month ago, so the fuel edge is the cost offset against the revenue gain. Only Great Eastern Shipping carries a recorded fuel cost weight (13.39 percent); Shipping Corporation of India has the edge with no weight.
Shock type
cost_offset
Unit
USD/gallon
When it plays out
Immediate
Shipping stocks lead - the December 2023 Red Sea precedent had Great Eastern Shipping up 6.41% in a day. Exporters drift lower as buyers begin renegotiating.
Medium term
The January 2024 precedent shows the shipping trade has the longer legs - Shipping Corporation of India was up 31.01% a month later while Gokaldas Exports was down 2.67%. Rates normalise only when the chokepoint disruptions ease, which is tied to the Hormuz situation.
Short term
Watch export order books and the container availability position at Nhava Sheva and Mundra. Exporters will flag freight in their next quarterly commentary; the government may be pressed for a freight subsidy or interest-equalisation extension.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"High container freight to US/EU raises landed cost for exported components, reducing buyer margins and order competitiveness versus Mexico/Eastern Europe suppliers; working-capital cycle can stretch if shipments are delayed by rerouting.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BHARATFORG","SONACOMS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for export-oriented component makers with meaningful Europe/US exposure.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Although high-value shipments can use air freight, bulkier jewellery exports and importer replenishment still face logistics cost inflation and delivery uncertainty; weak buyer resistance can compress exporter margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is smaller than low-value bulky goods because value density is high, but export demand and delivery reliability can still be hit.","sector":"Gems and Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Longer voyages and higher refrigerated container costs raise delivered prices for shrimp and seafood exports to US/EU; cold-chain delays increase spoilage and rejection risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","WATERBASE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Shrimp exporters are sensitive to both freight rates and transit-time reliability.","sector":"Seafood and Aquaculture Exports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight spike raises landed costs for rice, spices, tea, coffee and processed foods; lower-value or bulky exports lose competitiveness fastest, especially where contracts are price-sensitive.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","TATACONSUM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on product value density and ability to pass through freight surcharges.","sector":"Agricultural and Processed Food Exports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exported machinery, forgings, castings and industrial products face higher container costs and delayed delivery windows, hurting competitiveness and execution timelines for overseas orders.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CGPOWER","SKFINDIA","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book execution may be affected more than immediate demand if delays persist.","sector":"Engineering Goods and Industrial Machinery","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight volatility increases demand for forwarding, route planning, warehousing and multimodal alternatives; however, margin benefit depends on ability to pass carrier surcharges without volume loss.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Asset-light forwarders may gain on spreads and volumes, while exporters cutting shipments can cap upside.","sector":"Freight Forwarders and Multimodal Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rerouting and schedule disruptions can increase dwell time, transshipment complexity and demand for container handling/storage; but weaker export volumes can offset handling gains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Beneficiaries mainly if congestion/storage revenues rise without a sharp fall in throughput.","sector":"Ports and Container Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters of high-value or time-sensitive goods may shift from sea to air to protect delivery commitments, supporting air cargo and express logistics demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INDIGO","BLUEDART","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Only viable for high-value, low-weight products; not a broad substitute for container freight.","sector":"Air Cargo and Express Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US/EU-bound leather goods and footwear are price-sensitive exports; freight inflation raises landed costs and can shift incremental orders toward closer or cheaper competing suppliers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BATAINDIA","RELAXO","MIRZAINT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Listed pure-play export exposure is limited, but the sector-level causal link is defensible.","sector":"Footwear and Leather Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 7 Aug 2026 | interim | ₹14.4 |
|---|---|---|
| 20 May 2026 | interim | ₹11.7 |
| 4 Feb 2026 | interim | ₹9 |
| 13 Nov 2025 | interim | ₹7.2 |
| 6 Aug 2025 | interim | ₹7.2 |
| 15 May 2025 | interim | ₹5.4 |
| 3 Feb 2025 | interim | ₹8.1 |
| 19 Nov 2024 | interim | ₹7.2 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 May 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 9,10,927 | ₹1,687.46 |
| 18 May 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 9,10,927 | ₹1,688.11 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call4 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-269 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call15 May 2026
- Earnings call30 Jan 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.