Shipping Corporation Of India Limited
NSE: SCIShipping
Share price
₹280.75
-1.61% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
64
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹13,083 Cr
P/E ratio
8.1
P/B ratio
1.4
ROCE
13.9%
ROE
15.0%
Dividend yield
2.7%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 16.7% over the past year, and 1.9% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 27.6% to 39.4% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 1.9% a year against a sector median of 9.8% — 7.9 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 8.1× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 15.3×, across 3 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 9.4×, the 33rd percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 0.5 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 15%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shipping Corporation Of India Limited — this one | 15%/yr | 8.1× | ₹0.54 |
| The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited | 0%/yr | 5.8× | — |
| Shreeji Shipping Global Limited | 10%/yr | 81.7× | ₹8.2 |
| Seamec Limited | 105%/yr | 15.3× | — |
| TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES LIMITED | — | — | — |
| Essar Shipping Limited | -20%/yr | — | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Shipping), it ranks 4 of 6 on returns, 5 of 5 on growth, 3 of 6 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 13.9% on capital, ahead of 33% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹6296 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹3205 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹3234 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 197 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 74 days for its cash to waiting 140 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
6 of 9 checks clear · 67%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Profit rose 75% to ₹619 crore on 40% higher revenue
Announced 6 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹1,847 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+40.3%
Revenue vs last quarter
+22.0%
Net profit
₹619 Cr
Profit vs last year
+75.0%
Profit vs last quarter
+52.9%
Net margin
33.5%
EPS
₹13.30
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹13,083 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹280.75
- 52w High
- ₹369
- 52w Low
- ₹196
- Enterprise value
- ₹15,327 Cr
- Beta
- 1.4
- Price CAGR 1y
- 31.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 26.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 24.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 18.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 10.2%
- PEG ratio
- 0.5
- P/E ratio
- 8.1
- P/B ratio
- 1.4
- EV / EBITDA
- 6.1
- Industry P/E
- 19.9
- ROCE
- 13.9%
- ROCE 5y average
- 10.0%
- ROE
- 15.0%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.3
- Interest coverage
- 9.2
- Dividend yield
- 2.7%
- ROE 3y average
- 12.0%
- ROE last year
- 15.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹5,780 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹1,353 Cr
- Operating margin
- 38.0%
- Net profit margin
- 23.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 37.8%
- Sales growth 3y
- -0.1%
- Sales growth 5y
- 9.3%
- Profit growth 3y
- 15.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 14.0%
- EPS
- ₹29.1
- Sales growth TTM
- 17.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 79.0%
- Dividend payout
- 26.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹1,847 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹619 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 40.3%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 74.9%
- OPM latest quarter
- 45.4%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹195
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹2,679 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹349 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹2,679 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 18.5
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹1,343 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹154 Cr
- FCF yield
- -2.5%
- Net cash flow
- -₹25 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 63.8%
- FII holding
- 9.0%
- DII holding
- 2.1%
- Public holding
- 25.2%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE Shipping Co | 1,539.25 | 5.9 | 21,975 | 2.25 | 1,308.8 | 159.4 | 2,005.4 | 66.9 | 15.8 |
| Shreeji Ship. Gl | 804.10 | 82.0 | 13,100 | 0.12 | 44.3 | 19.1 | 208.9 | 29.6 | 27.9 |
| S C I | 277.80 | 8.0 | 12,940 | 2.73 | 619.3 | 74.9 | 1,846.6 | 40.3 | 13.9 |
| SEAMEC Ltd | 1,576.95 | 15.6 | 4,009 | 0.12 | 81.3 | 7.2 | 296.9 | 40.8 | 19.7 |
| ABS Marine | 315.25 | 9.8 | 774 | 0.00 | 49.5 | 154.9 | 183.1 | 83.5 | 20.7 |
| Essar Shipping | 16.28 | 337 | 0.00 | 230.4 | -200.9 | 0.0 | -97.6 | ||
| Transworld Shipp | 153.35 | 337 | 0.00 | 29.5 | 427.9 | 102.5 | -25.9 | -4.5 | |
| Median | 277.80 | 11.0 | 774 | 0.00 | 49.5 | 61.5 | 183.1 | 40.5 | 14.9 |
Competes with: Essar Shipping Limited, Seamec Limited, Shreeji Shipping Global Limited, TRANSWORLD SHIPPING LINES LIMITED, The Great Eastern Shipping Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,200 | 1,093 | 1,341 | 1,413 | 1,514 | 1,451 | 1,316 | 1,325 | 1,316 | 1,339 | 1,612 | 1,513 | 1,847 |
| Expenses | 837 | 858 | 924 | 1,005 | 1,005 | 918 | 958 | 961 | 827 | 932 | 934 | 910 | 1,009 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 163 | 127 | 132 | 154 | 171 | 144 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 797 | 700 | 800 | 779 | 731 | 820 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 363 | 236 | 417 | 407 | 510 | 533 | 357 | 365 | 489 | 406 | 678 | 603 | 837 |
| OPM % | 30 | 22 | 31 | 29 | 34 | 37 | 27 | 28 | 37 | 30 | 42 | 40 | 45 |
| Other Income | 51 | 94 | 25 | 113 | 49 | 43 | 45 | 88 | 157 | 111 | 69 | 147 | 110 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 35 | 56 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 43 | 64 | 39 | 31 | 47 | 48 | 47 | 37 |
| Depreciation | 197 | 200 | 251 | 241 | 220 | 234 | 255 | 243 | 250 | 256 | 271 | 287 | 282 |
| Profit before tax | 182 | 74 | 151 | 239 | 298 | 298 | 84 | 171 | 366 | 214 | 427 | 416 | 628 |
| Tax % | 5 | 11 | 11 | -29 | 2 | 2 | 10 | -8 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Net Profit | 172 | 66 | 134 | 307 | 291 | 291 | 76 | 185 | 354 | 189 | 405 | 405 | 619 |
| EPS in Rs | 3.68 | 1.41 | 2.88 | 6.60 | 6.26 | 6.26 | 1.62 | 3.97 | 7.60 | 4.06 | 8.69 | 8.69 | 13 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 3.97 | 7.60 | 4.06 | 8.69 | 8.69 | 13 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,311 | 4,050 | 3,447 | 3,469 | 3,873 | 4,425 | 3,703 | 4,995 | 5,794 | 5,047 | 5,606 | 5,780 | 6,310 |
| Expenses | 3,396 | 2,688 | 2,667 | 2,793 | 3,160 | 3,283 | 2,544 | 3,465 | 4,237 | 3,624 | 3,841 | 3,593 | 3,785 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 568 | 584 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 3,273 | 3,010 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 916 | 1,362 | 780 | 677 | 713 | 1,143 | 1,159 | 1,530 | 1,557 | 1,423 | 1,765 | 2,186 | 2,525 |
| OPM % | 21 | 34 | 23 | 20 | 18 | 26 | 31 | 31 | 27 | 28 | 31 | 38 | 40 |
| Other Income | 395 | 193 | 185 | 196 | 292 | 277 | 204 | 175 | 184 | 283 | 225 | 474 | 436 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 239 | 195 | 174 | 180 | 362 | 367 | 22 | 161 | 185 | 171 | 187 | 173 | 180 |
| Depreciation | 801 | 542 | 566 | 610 | 658 | 671 | 628 | 635 | 753 | 889 | 951 | 1,064 | 1,096 |
| Profit before tax | 270 | 818 | 226 | 82 | -16 | 382 | 713 | 909 | 803 | 645 | 852 | 1,423 | 1,685 |
| Tax % | 28 | 4 | 19 | -273 | 304 | 12 | 2 | 5 | -8 | -5 | 1 | 5 | |
| Net Profit | 195 | 782 | 182 | 306 | -63 | 336 | 696 | 865 | 870 | 679 | 844 | 1,353 | 1,618 |
| EPS in Rs | 4.19 | 17 | 3.92 | 6.58 | -1.35 | 7.22 | 15 | 19 | 19 | 15 | 18 | 29 | 35 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 18 | 29 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 36 | 26 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 4%
- 5 years
- 9%
- 3 years
- -0%
- TTM
- 17%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 5%
- 5 years
- 14%
- 3 years
- 15%
- TTM
- 79%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 18%
- 5 years
- 24%
- 3 years
- 26%
- 1 year
- 31%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 8%
- 5 years
- 11%
- 3 years
- 12%
- Last year
- 15%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 | 466 |
| Reserves | 6,053 | 6,272 | 6,428 | 6,769 | 6,717 | 7,018 | 7,702 | 8,631 | 6,437 | 7,074 | 7,846 | 8,630 |
| Borrowings | 7,739 | 5,845 | 5,492 | 5,585 | 5,277 | 4,767 | 3,679 | 3,200 | 2,605 | 2,914 | 2,228 | 2,679 |
| Other Liabilities | 1,580 | 2,148 | 2,162 | 1,686 | 1,896 | 1,668 | 1,556 | 1,956 | 1,936 | 1,646 | 1,161 | 1,543 |
| Total Liabilities | 15,839 | 14,731 | 14,549 | 14,506 | 14,357 | 13,919 | 13,403 | 14,253 | 11,443 | 12,100 | 11,701 | 13,318 |
| Fixed Assets | 12,280 | 11,827 | 11,411 | 11,348 | 11,119 | 10,653 | 10,174 | 7,625 | 7,403 | 7,004 | 6,711 | 7,199 |
| CWIP | 567 | 0 | 27 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 33 | 58 | 34 | 42 | 4 | 5 |
| Investments | 77 | 80 | 136 | 269 | 279 | 298 | 354 | 476 | 611 | 657 | 826 | 774 |
| Other Assets | 2,915 | 2,824 | 2,975 | 2,882 | 2,951 | 2,964 | 2,841 | 6,094 | 3,395 | 4,397 | 4,159 | 5,341 |
| Total Assets | 15,839 | 14,731 | 14,549 | 14,506 | 14,357 | 13,919 | 13,403 | 14,253 | 11,443 | 12,100 | 11,701 | 13,319 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 2,197 | 1,490 | 683 | 228 | 712 | 945 | 1,340 | 1,644 | 1,465 | 994 | 850 | 1,343 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -308 | -11 | -86 | -471 | 7 | 324 | -206 | -1,079 | -501 | -573 | -316 | -850 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -1,675 | -1,095 | -522 | -87 | -866 | -1,120 | -1,154 | -653 | -930 | 103 | -1,236 | -518 |
| Net Cash Flow | 214 | 384 | 74 | -329 | -146 | 149 | -20 | -88 | 34 | 524 | -702 | -25 |
| Free Cash Flow | 1,538 | 976 | 508 | -241 | 594 | 959 | 1,144 | 1,151 | 990 | 546 | 558 | -154 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 68 | 61 | 70 | 70 | 56 | 50 | 62 | 47 | 64 | 102 | 78 | 75 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 68 | 61 | 70 | 70 | 56 | 50 | 62 | 47 | 64 | 102 | 78 | 75 |
| Working Capital Days | -161 | -143 | -290 | -236 | -264 | -255 | -115 | 74 | -41 | -42 | 77 | 140 |
| ROCE % | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 14 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
total loans / revolving facilities outstanding at period end, the base of loan_default_cr
2,394cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
2,244inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
4,00,42,481inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Shipping Corporation Of India Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Bunker fuel / low-sulphur marine fuel oil
- Lubricants
- Ship stores, spares & paints
Depends on the price of
- fuel
Sells to
- Bharat Heavy Electricals · Break-bulk / project heavy-cargo shipping
- Bharat Petroleum Corporation · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Chennai Petroleum Corporation Limited · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Indian Oil Corporation · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Limited · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Oil & Natural Gas Corporation · Offshore support vessels & crude shipping
- Petronet LNG · LNG carrier shipping (Dahej/Kochi imports)
- Reliance Industries · Crude & product tanker shipping
- Steel Authority of India · Dry-bulk shipping (coking coal / iron ore imports)
Buys from
- Bharat Wire Ropes Limited · Marine, towing, mooring & ship-crane wire ropes
- Cochin Shipyard Limited · double-hull Aframax tankers, merchant-ship repair services, MR product tanker bids
- Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders Limited · 3000 DWT methanol dual-fuel-diesel-electric PSV
- Shipping Corporation of India Land and Assets Limited · Leased real estate — residential apartments, office space and SCI premises held as non-cor…
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Services
- Industry
- Shipping
- Classification
- Services › Shipping
- ISIN
- INE109A01011
Business segments
- Tanker · 68%
- Bulk Carrier · 14%
- Liner · 14%
- Technical & Offshore · 5%
News impact
Big market events that reach Shipping Corporation Of India Limited, and how the effect spreads.
2 Oct, 15:13 IST · Market event · medium impact
Government extends RELIEF scheme to shield exporters from West Asia logistics disruption
The government extended shipping-cost relief for exporters hit by West Asia disruptions, helping exporters and cargo carriers keep volumes steady while taxpayers cover the support cost.
Who it hits first
- The government extended Part II of its RELIEF scheme for exporters through a September 30 notice, so help with high shipping costs continues.
- Exporters sending goods through West Asia routes keep getting support instead of facing the full jump in freight bills alone.
- Cargo carriers, ports and freight handlers keep steadier export volumes because subsidised exporters keep shipping.
Who may gain
- Indian exporters who ship goods through West Asia sea and air routes — their freight bills shrink.
- Cargo shipowners such as the Shipping Corporation of India and the Great Eastern Shipping Company — steadier sailings and charter demand.
- Freight movers such as Transport Corporation of India and Container Corporation of India — fuller trucks and container trains.
- Port operators such as Adani Ports — steadier export cargo passing through their terminals.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Makers of exported goods keep orders moving and overseas buyers keep receiving Indian shipments on time, so the downstream effect is continuity of trade rather than new demand.
Upstream
Steadier sailings support demand for ship fuel, vessel charters, containers and port handling services, though the scheme pays exporters rather than buying these inputs directly.
Where demand moves
Business
Exporters facing lower net freight costs keep booking shipments instead of delaying them, so demand flows from exporters to shipping lines, freight forwarders, rail-container movers and ports as steadier cargo volumes over the next few weeks.
Capital
Investors are likely to favour listed shipping, logistics and port shares on steadier volume hopes, while exporters themselves save working capital that would otherwise sit in freight bills.
How it spreads across sectors
Services
Positive for logistics, shipping and port members as RELIEF keeps export cargo flowing through West Asia routes; IT, staffing and facility-service members see no real spillover.
When it plays out
Immediate
In the next 1-7 days, exporter sentiment steadies and shipping and logistics shares may edge up on hopes of steadier cargo.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months, the benefit lasts only while the extension runs and West Asia disruption persists; if freight rates normalise, the effect fades.
Short term
Over 1-4 weeks, exporters file for relief and keep shipment schedules, showing up as steadier port and freight volumes.
11 Sept, 04:38 IST · Market event · high impact
Brent crude surges past $105-107 on Red Sea tanker attacks, Houthi capture of Mocha and Saudi output cut as US-Iran war escalates
Oil jumped past $105 as war hit more tankers, so fuel users like airlines, paints and refiners pay more for now, while oil producers like ONGC earn more.
Who it hits first
- Chennai Petroleum's Manali refinery faces gross-refining-margin squeeze as crude jumps 5-6% in a day
- OMCs (IOC, BPCL, Hindustan Petroleum) face marketing losses as pump prices cannot rise as fast as crude
- ONGC and Oil India gain on higher crude realisations on every barrel sold
- IndiGo's jet-fuel bill jumps just as festive-season demand builds
Who may gain
- ONGC and Oil India earn more per barrel on higher Brent
- Coal India gains as IEA sees coal demand rising on the Middle East conflict
- Shipping Corp benefits from spiking tanker rates on Red Sea disruption
- NTPC gains thermal dispatch as costly oil/gas back out of the merit order
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Refiners absorb margin squeeze first; petrochemical, paint, tyre and plastic makers follow with 1-2 quarter lags; airlines and logistics pass fuel costs to travellers and shippers within weeks.
Upstream
Oilfield service firms gain as ONGC/Oil push output; Coal India gains substitution demand as IEA flags higher coal burn; gas utilities face costlier LNG cargoes.
Where demand moves
Business
Crude supply disrupted at Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb raises refiners' input costs; paint, tyre and chemical makers face a cost push they can pass on only with a lag; airlines raise fares and freight operators add fuel surcharges, pushing costs onto FMCG and e-commerce deliveries.
Capital
Money exits oil-sensitive consumers (airlines, paints, tyres, OMCs) and rotates into upstream producers (ONGC, Oil India), defensives (pharma, staples) and large-cap banks on dips; foreign selling pressure rises as India's import bill widens.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
fuel-price drag on demand; freight inflation lifts input costs
Chemicals
naphtha and feedstock costs up 5-10%; margins compress before pass-through
Consumer Durables
paint makers face crude-linked input inflation near 40% of costs
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GRMs squeezed near term; inventory gains partly offset; upstream realisations jump
Power
thermal dispatch rises as oil/gas peakers turn expensive; coal demand up
Services
airlines and logistics add fuel surcharges; tanker rates spike
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Crude Oil Brent
Shock type
price
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Brent +5-6% past $105 on tanker attacks
- OMC marketing margins squeezed; GRMs compress
- Paint/tyre/chemical input costs up with 1-2 quarter pass-through lag
- Airlines raise fares; logistics add fuel surcharge
- Capital rotates to upstream, coal, defensives
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
- Power
- Chemicals
- Automobile and Auto Components
- Consumer Durables
- Services
When it plays out
Immediate
Brent volatility keeps OMC, paint, tyre and airline stocks under pressure while ONGC/Oil India outperform; rupee stays weak near 95.5.
Medium term
If Hormuz stays threatened, structural freight and feedstock inflation feeds RBI caution; a ceasefire unwinds the shock fast — upstream gains fade first.
Short term
Watch fare and freight hikes, weekly GRM prints, and whether OMCs get excise relief; inventory gains cushion refiners' Q2 numbers.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher crude raises diesel freight costs and the prices of petroleum coke and imported coal; delivered cement costs rise, while inflation-driven interest-rate pressure can subsequently weaken construction demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","AMBUJACEM","SHREECEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Producers with captive power, efficient logistics and stronger regional pricing power should be relatively resilient.","sector":"Cement and Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude-linked plastic packaging, surfactant and transport costs rise; price increases lag input inflation, compressing margins, while higher fuel spending reduces rural and urban discretionary consumption.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HINDUNILVR","DABUR","BRITANNIA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Staples demand is defensive, but low-priced packs make rapid cost pass-through difficult.","sector":"Fast-Moving Consumer Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"An oil shock lifts natural-gas, ammonia, sulphur, freight and imported feedstock costs; regulated fertilizer prices shift the burden toward producer working capital or government subsidy, while crop-protection firms face margin pressure.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","PARADEEP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"The effect could become mixed if higher global crop prices improve farm economics and agrochemical volumes.","sector":"Fertilizers and Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher crude increases polyester, nylon, dyes, chemicals and transport costs; exporters also face longer or more expensive Red Sea routes to Europe, squeezing margins before contract repricing.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KPRMILL","TRIDENT","WELSPUNLIV"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Cotton-focused firms have lower direct synthetic-feedstock exposure but still face freight and processing-energy inflation.","sector":"Textiles and Apparel","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude and naphtha inflation flows into polymers, resins, films and adhesives; packaging converters face a timing mismatch between immediate raw-material increases and delayed customer pass-through.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["UFLEX","POLYPLEX","COSMOFIRST"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Inventory gains and contractual pass-through clauses may cushion some producers.","sector":"Packaging and Plastic Products","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Costlier oil widens India's inflation and current-account risks, potentially delaying rate cuts and lifting bond yields; funding costs and borrower stress rise, particularly in vehicle, transport and consumption-linked lending.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","BAJFINANCE","SHRIRAMFIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Banks may initially benefit from higher yields, but prolonged oil prices above $100 would raise asset-quality and growth risks.","sector":"Banks and Non-Bank Financial Companies","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Oil-driven inflation raises construction-material and logistics costs; if it delays monetary easing, mortgage affordability and housing demand weaken while developer financing remains expensive.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DLF","GODREJPROP","PRESTIGE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Premium developers with low leverage and strong presales should withstand the shock better.","sector":"Real Estate","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher diesel, explosives, shipping and smelting-energy costs pressure miners and metal producers; however, supply-route disruption and broader commodity inflation can lift selling prices, producing divergent company effects.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HINDALCO","TATASTEEL","NMDC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Energy-intensive aluminium and steel producers face cost pressure, while ore miners and firms with captive energy may benefit from commodity-price inflation.","sector":"Metals and Mining","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"A sustained oil shock weakens Indian growth and the rupee; rupee depreciation improves exporters' translated revenue and margins, though global risk aversion and weaker client budgets can later reduce discretionary technology spending.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","HCLTECH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"The currency benefit is relatively immediate, while demand deterioration would emerge with a lag.","sector":"Information Technology Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Persistently expensive imported hydrocarbons strengthen the economic and policy case for solar, wind, storage, grid upgrades and electrification, accelerating orders and investment despite near-term freight inflation.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SUZLON","WAAREEENER","POWERGRID"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefits require the oil shock to persist long enough to influence procurement and capital-allocation decisions.","sector":"Renewable Energy and Electrical Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
31 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · medium impact
Shipping ministry retains cabotage relaxations for foreign-flag vessels in Indian coastal trade, leaving Indian-flag shipowners facing continued competition
The shipping ministry will keep letting foreign ships carry cargo between Indian ports. Indian shipowners such as Shipping Corporation keep facing cheaper foreign competition, while ports that handle those ships are unaffected or mildly better off.
Who it hits first
- Indian-flag coastal vessel operators - Shipping Corporation of India most directly - keep facing foreign-flag competition on domestic routes and lose the policy relief they had lobbied for.
- Great Eastern Shipping is affected in principle but far less in practice, because most of its fleet earns internationally and from offshore services.
Who may gain
- Cargo owners - refiners, cement makers, steel mills and fertiliser companies moving bulk along the coast - keep access to cheaper foreign tonnage, so their inbound freight cost stays lower.
- Ports and terminal operators are neutral to mildly better off, because they earn per tonne handled regardless of the ship's flag and more vessels are free to call.
- Coastal logistics and multimodal operators benefit from cheaper sea legs when planning road-versus-sea routings.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Bulk cargo owners that move coal, cement, steel, fertiliser and petroleum products along the Indian coast keep paying lower freight than they would under a protected regime, which is a small but persistent cost advantage. Ports and terminal operators handle the same or slightly higher vessel calls, so their throughput is unaffected.
Upstream
Indian shipyards and ship-repair yards lose the second-order order flow that a cabotage rollback would have triggered, since domestic owners have less reason to add Indian-flag tonnage. Indian maritime crewing agencies and marine insurers similarly forgo the volume growth that flag-protected domestic tonnage would have generated.
Where demand moves
Business
Coastal freight demand keeps flowing to whoever quotes cheapest, which under continued relaxation is disproportionately foreign-flag tonnage. Indian shipowners lose the volume they had expected to recapture, so their charter demand and fleet utilisation stay under pressure. Cargo owners - refiners, cement, steel and fertiliser shippers - keep the benefit of lower coastal freight rates, which slightly improves their landed cost. Ports see the same or marginally more cargo either way.
Capital
Money stays away from Indian-flag coastal shipowners, where the policy call removes the catalyst that a re-rating case rested on, and continues to favour port and terminal operators, whose earnings are flag-agnostic and volume-linked. Within shipping, capital prefers internationally-earning fleets such as Great Eastern Shipping over coastal-dependent tonnage.
How it spreads across sectors
Services
Indian-flag coastal shipowners keep losing share to foreign tonnage; ports and cargo owners neutral to positive
When it plays out
Immediate
Minimal price reaction - this is the continuation of an existing policy, and the disappointment is the absence of a change rather than a new negative.
Medium term
Without flag protection, Indian coastal tonnage growth stays slow and domestic owners keep prioritising international routes. The structural loser is the Indian shipbuilding and coastal fleet ambition; the structural winner is landed freight cost for Indian manufacturers.
Short term
Watch for industry-body representations and any partial carve-out for specific cargo types, which is how this policy has been adjusted before.
25 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · high impact
UPDATE: US fires its 'economic D-Day' at Iran - Treasury broadens secondary sanctions to any entity trading with Tehran and warns third countries they will lose dollar access, the rial hits a record low, and yet Brent slips on the day to $93
America has told the whole world to stop doing business with Iran or be cut off from the US dollar, but oil actually dipped because traders had already assumed Iran's barrels were gone - so Indian refiners and plastic, paint and polyester makers still pay a high oil bill, while state-run oil producers and tanker owners collect more.
Who it hits first
- Indian refiners that own no oil fields - Chennai Petroleum above all - pay full price for a $93 barrel while the price they charge lags
- Anyone shipping cargo through the Strait of Hormuz now pays roughly $20 million per voyage in insurance and freight, which lands on Indian importers and exporters
- Indian exporters to Iran - rice, tea, pharmaceuticals and engineering goods - lose a market as Dubai halts re-exports and banks refuse the paperwork
- Plastic, paint, tyre and polyester makers face dearer crude-linked raw materials
Who may gain
- State oil marketing companies BPCL and HPCL, which have historically captured a wider margin between crude they buy at a discount and pump prices that move slowly
- Tanker owners Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India, as war-risk premia and longer routes tighten the supply of usable ships
- Domestic crude producers ONGC and Oil India earn more per barrel, though past sanctions rounds show the government often claws part of that back
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream of the refiners, PVC pipe makers like Apollo Pipes, polyester spinners like Filatex and lubricant blenders like Savita Oil all buy crude-derived inputs and cannot raise their own prices as fast, so the cost stops with them for a quarter or two.
Upstream
Crude and naphtha suppliers keep their volumes but sell at a war premium; shipowners and marine insurers upstream of every cargo raise their price, and the roughly $20 million Hormuz transit cost is passed straight down to Indian refiners and chemical importers.
Where demand moves
Business
Iranian barrels leave the open market, so Indian refiners buy from Saudi, Iraqi, US and Russian sellers who discount to keep the volume; that discount is captured by the refiners rather than by the producers. At the same time exporters who sold rice, tea and medicines into Iran lose those orders outright and must find buyers in Africa and South-East Asia at lower prices.
Capital
Money rotates out of crude-consuming manufacturers - plastics, paints, tyres, polyester - and into the two places that gain from the same barrel: state oil marketing companies and tanker owners. Some also parks in defensive consumer names while the sanctions detail is unclear, which is what dragged the Sensex 172 points lower on the day.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
PVC and polymer costs rise for pipe and fitting makers
Chemicals
Naphtha-linked feedstock costs rise across the specialty chain
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Refiners squeezed on input cost, marketing companies helped by discounted barrels, producers helped on realisation but exposed to subsidy sharing
Services
Tanker charter rates and war-risk insurance both rise, helping shipowners and hurting anyone who charters
Textiles
Polyester feedstock rises with crude, squeezing yarn spinners
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Crude Oil Brent
Note
Brent is 4.46% higher over the ranker's roughly-weekly window but fell on the announcement day itself. Cost-weight percentages are null on every DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge in the graph, so a margin impact in basis points cannot be computed without inventing a number.
Shock type
price
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Brent held near $93 by sanctions
- Refiner input cost up, marketing margin up for OMCs
- Polyester and PVC feedstock up
- Paints, tyres and packaging input cost up
- Freight and marine insurance up ~$20mn per Hormuz cargo
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
- Services
- Textiles
- Chemicals
- Capital Goods
When it plays out
Immediate
Indian shares fell as investors waited for the sanctions text; oil-consuming manufacturers and Chennai Petroleum lead the drop while state oil marketing companies hold up.
Medium term
If Iranian barrels stay off the market, discounts from Saudi, Iraqi and Russian sellers widen and Indian refiners' margins improve structurally - the pattern that produced double-digit gains for BPCL and HPCL after every past sanctions round.
Short term
The detail of which banks, shippers and insurers are named decides whether Indian exporters to Iran are formally shut out; watch tanker charter rates and the Hormuz insurance quote.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Iran/West Asia escalation raises LNG, ammonia, sulphur and freight costs; sanctions also complicate regional procurement and payment routes; subsidy timing may lag cost inflation for urea and complex fertilizer makers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","GNFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant if gas or sulphur prices stay elevated rather than only a one-day crude move.","sector":"Fertilizers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher crude lifts ATF costs; Gulf airspace and insurance risk can lengthen routes or raise operating costs; outbound Middle East traffic may soften if regional risk rises.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","SPICEJET","TAJGVK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"IndiGo is the cleanest listed airline exposure; airport/hotel names are secondary demand exposures.","sector":"Aviation","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude-linked derivatives such as solvents, monomers, titanium dioxide logistics and packaging costs rise; margin pressure appears if companies cannot pass through input inflation quickly.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","BERGEPAINT","PIDILITIND"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Often reacts with a lag as inventory and pricing cycles reset.","sector":"Paints, Adhesives \u0026 Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crude-linked synthetic rubber, carbon black and freight costs rise; replacement-demand pricing power may offset part of the pressure but OEM-linked volumes face margin risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["APOLLOTYRE","CEATLTD","JKTYRE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Direction depends on ability to pass through higher raw-material costs.","sector":"Tyres \u0026 Rubber Products","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"India's humanitarian exports to Iran face banking, shipping and Dubai re-export disruption; receivables, route costs and compliance friction rise even where goods are exempt.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CIPLA","SUNPHARMA","DRREDDY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Iran is not usually a dominant revenue market, so this is more compliance/logistics than earnings-wide unless sanctions broaden.","sector":"Pharmaceuticals Exporters","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Iran is a buyer of Indian tea, rice and food items; Dubai re-export halt and payment constraints reduce shipment visibility and raise working-capital risk for exporters.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","MCLEODRUSS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Company impact varies sharply by Iran exposure; rice and tea names are most directly linked.","sector":"Tea, Rice \u0026 Agri Exporters","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Secondary-sanctions risk makes banks more cautious on letters of credit, remittances and dollar clearing involving Iran-linked counterparties; exporter financing and compliance costs rise.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SBIN","BANKBARODA","ICICIBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large banks may avoid losses through conservative compliance, but fee income and exporter credit flows can be disrupted.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Trade Finance","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"UAE is a major re-export and financing hub for precious stones and gold; wider scrutiny of Iran/UAE flows can tighten compliance, insurance and logistics across regional trading channels.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant to trade-flow disruption and gold volatility than direct Iran demand.","sector":"Gems \u0026 Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher LNG, imported coal freight and fuel-oil prices raise variable power costs; discom pass-through and merchant tariffs may move unevenly, creating mixed effects across generators and distributors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","TATAPOWER","JSWENERGY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regulated generators are less exposed; merchant and fuel-import-sensitive assets are more exposed.","sector":"Power Utilities \u0026 Merchant Generators","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · medium impact
Ultra-large container ships return to the Suez Canal - the 17,200-TEU Bangkok Maersk transits on an Italy-Singapore run - shortening Asia-Europe routes for Indian exporters even as Hormuz stays disrupted
The biggest container ships are sailing through the Suez Canal again instead of going the long way round Africa, which cuts about two weeks and some freight cost off shipping Indian clothes, linen and chemicals to Europe - helpful for exporters, unhelpful for shipowners who were paid for the longer trip.
Who it hits first
- Indian exporters shipping to Europe - garments, home textiles, chemicals and engineering goods - pay less per container and get paid sooner, because the goods reach the buyer around two weeks earlier.
- Container shipping lines lose the other side of that trade: a shorter voyage means the same cargo absorbs fewer ship-days, so effective capacity rises and freight rates fall.
Who may gain
- Export-heavy apparel and home-textile makers whose European customers price on landed cost - Pearl Global, KPR Mill, Trident, Welspun Living.
- Container terminals, inland container depots and rail container operators, which handle more boxes per month when sailings speed up.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
European retailers and brands are the end buyers and capture part of the freight saving through renegotiated landed-cost contracts, so Indian exporters will not keep all of it. Container liners and charter owners sit on the losing side, as shorter voyages release effective capacity and soften rates.
Upstream
Yarn and fabric mills, dyeing units and chemical intermediate makers that feed the exporters see steadier order flow, because a shorter shipping cycle lets brands place repeat orders inside the same season rather than committing once a year.
Where demand moves
Business
The same volume of Indian goods now travels a shorter route. Exporters gain because freight is a real line item in a garment's landed cost and a two-week faster delivery lets European buyers reorder within a season. Shipping lines lose, because the industry sells ship-days: when every voyage gets shorter, the same fleet can carry more cargo, so freight rates fall. Container handlers in between gain on throughput.
Capital
Money rotates towards export-facing manufacturers with European exposure and away from container shipowners whose freight rates were being propped up by the longer Cape route. Indian shipowners are a partial exception because Great Eastern Shipping is mostly tankers, whose rates are still being set by the separate Hormuz disruption.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Bulk and specialty chemical exporters to Europe get lower delivered cost and faster working-capital turns.
Pharma
Formulation exporters to the EU see shorter cold-chain and shipping cycles, a modest working-capital benefit on an already air-freight-heavy trade.
Services
Container shipping tonne-mile demand falls as the Cape detour ends, which pressures freight and charter rates; container terminals and rail container operators gain throughput.
Textiles
Freight cost per container to Europe falls and lead times shorten, improving Indian competitiveness against Bangladesh and Vietnam on EU orders.
When it plays out
Immediate
One ship transit is a signal, not a trend. Expect no measurable earnings impact this quarter and only a sentiment nudge for export names.
Medium term
If Suez routing normalises through FY27, Indian exporters to Europe carry a structurally lower landed cost, while container freight rates give back the war-premium they have held since 2024.
Short term
Watch whether major carriers publish Suez-routed Asia-Europe schedules for the next sailing season. That, not a single transit, is what actually resets freight rates.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization reduces Asia-Europe container transit time and freight volatility, improving delivery reliability and landed margins for Indian auto-component exporters supplying European OEMs and aftermarket channels.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BOSCHLTD","UNOMINDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit strongest for exporters with meaningful Europe exposure and containerized shipments.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Shorter India-Europe routing lowers logistics cost for project equipment, industrial components and machinery exports, improving quote competitiveness and execution timelines for export orders.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ABB","SIEMENS","BHEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Draft mentions engineering exporters but not the sector; impact depends on export mix and contract pass-through terms.","sector":"Capital Goods \u0026 Engineering","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower Europe-bound freight friction and faster logistics support export turnaround for finished jewellery and precious-stone shipments, while reduced uncertainty helps inventory planning for seasonal European demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Air freight is important for high-value goods, so ocean-route normalization is a secondary benefit.","sector":"Gems \u0026 Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced transit time to Europe improves cold-chain reliability and lowers spoilage or working-capital risk for containerized food exports, especially frozen seafood and processed agri products.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","VENKEYS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant where Europe is a meaningful export market and reefer-container availability improves.","sector":"Seafood \u0026 Processed Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Return of large vessels through Suez can normalize Asia-Europe schedules, lifting predictability and container handling volumes at Indian ports linked to Europe trade lanes, though fewer Cape-related tonne-miles may reduce some transshipment distortions.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive for throughput and schedule reliability; mixed if freight-rate normalization reduces ancillary congestion-related gains.","sector":"Ports \u0026 Port Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved vessel schedules increase container evacuation predictability from ports to ICDs and manufacturing clusters, supporting rail/container movement and reducing dwell-time disruptions.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","TCI","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Complements CFS/ICD beneficiaries but extends to inland rail and trucking logistics.","sector":"Surface Logistics \u0026 Rail Freight","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cheaper and faster Asia-Europe/Asia-Med container flows can ease imported component availability and shipping costs for electronics and appliance supply chains, while European export channels for finished goods improve modestly.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect because many inputs are Asia-sourced, but global container normalization can still reduce freight premia.","sector":"Consumer Durables \u0026 Electronics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization helps container trade but Hormuz disruption keeps crude and LNG risk premia elevated; refiners and OMCs face margin and working-capital pressure if energy freight or crude prices remain volatile.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"This is a parallel negative ripple from the unresolved Hormuz disruption rather than a Suez beneficiary.","sector":"Oil \u0026 Gas Marketing / Refining","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Hormuz and West Asia disruption can affect feedstock, ammonia, sulphur and energy-linked input costs, while Suez normalization only partly offsets logistics pressure on non-energy cargoes.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","GNFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive freight normalization may be outweighed by gas/feedstock volatility for some producers.","sector":"Fertilisers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 4 Sep 2026 | unspecified | ₹1 |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Feb 2026 | interim | ₹3.5 |
| 19 Nov 2025 | interim | ₹3 |
| 4 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹6.59 |
| 6 Sep 2024 | unspecified | ₹0.5 |
| 1 Sep 2023 | unspecified | ₹0.44 |
| 31 Mar 2023 | demerger | ₹0 |
| 22 Sep 2022 | unspecified | ₹0.33 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Apr 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 38,60,665 | ₹310.41 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 38,60,665 | ₹310.57 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 33,63,990 | ₹308.93 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 33,52,443 | ₹308.76 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 32,09,072 | ₹310.32 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 32,09,072 | ₹310.19 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | SELL | 24,91,664 | ₹309.23 |
| 17 Apr 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | BUY | 24,66,830 | ₹309.38 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2626 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2611 May 2026
- Annual report · 2024-2518 Sep 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.