Fin Cascade

Prices as of 8 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited

NSE: NYKAAE-Retail/ E-Commerce

Share price

₹332.30

-2.62% close of 8 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹95,038 CrP/E 357.3

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

71

out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹95,038 Cr

P/E ratio

357.3

P/B ratio

66.2

ROCE

17.2%

ROE

15.3%

Dividend yield

0.0%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 8 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹349.5552-week low ₹234.70

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Sales grew 27.4% over the past year, and 29.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 4.4% to 7.9% over the last four years.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

It grew 29.0% a year against a sector median of 13.9% — 15.1 percentage points faster.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

Priced at 2.9 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 122%.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited — this one122%/yr357.3×—
ETERNAL LIMITED28%/yr——
Meesho Limited6%/yr——
Swiggy Limited0%/yr——
Urban Company Limited8%/yr——
Cartrade Tech Limited89%/yr57.0×₹0.64

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (E-Retail/ E-Commerce), it ranks 2 of 12 on returns, 6 of 11 on growth, 3 of 12 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

A narrow advantage: it earns 17.2% on capital, ahead of 83% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

No — Over the last five years it made ₹617 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹692 crore on plant and equipment, ₹75 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹593 crore to ₹1238 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 9 years, about 156 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 67 days for its cash to waiting 4 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

8 of 9 checks clear · 89%

Latest result · Q1 FY27

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Revenue grew 29% and profit more than tripled as Beauty and Fashion both accelerated.

Announced 4 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited

Revenue

₹2,782 Cr

Revenue vs last year

+29.1%

Revenue vs last quarter

+5.1%

Net profit

₹80 Cr

Profit vs last year

+232.3%

Profit vs last quarter

+1.0%

Net margin

2.9%

EPS

₹0.28

Earnings call transcript · 4 Aug 2026

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹95,038 Cr
Prev close
₹332.30
52w High
₹350
52w Low
₹232
Enterprise value
₹95,956 Cr
Beta
0.8
Price CAGR 1y
33.0%
Price CAGR 3y
32.0%
Price CAGR 5y
—
Price CAGR 10y
—

Ratios

Return on assets
4.4%
PEG ratio
2.9
P/E ratio
357.3
P/B ratio
66.2
EV / EBITDA
113.2
Industry P/E
57.2
ROCE
17.2%
ROCE 5y average
9.4%
ROE
15.3%
Debt / Equity
0.9
Interest coverage
3.8
Dividend yield
0.0%
ROE 3y average
8.0%
ROE last year
15.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹10,022 Cr
Annual profit
₹204 Cr
Operating margin
8.0%
Net profit margin
2.0%
EBITDA margin
7.5%
Sales growth 3y
24.9%
Sales growth 5y
32.6%
Profit growth 3y
122.0%
Profit growth 5y
28.0%
EPS
₹0.7
Sales growth TTM
27.0%
Profit growth TTM
234.0%
Dividend payout
0.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹2,782 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹80 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
29.1%
YoY quarterly profit growth
233.3%
OPM latest quarter
8.5%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹5.0
Face Value
₹1.0
Total debt
₹1,238 Cr
Total cash
₹320 Cr
Borrowings
₹1,238 Cr
Reserves / Equity
4.0

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
₹644 Cr
Free cash flow
₹493 Cr
FCF yield
0.4%
Net cash flow
₹52 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
52.1%
FII holding
13.7%
DII holding
24.1%
Public holding
10.1%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
Eternal323.60721.23,12,2850.0092.0268.020,211.0182.02.5
Meesho231.151,06,9880.00-132.838.53,712.848.3-40.0
FSN E-Commerce339.45365.397,2290.0079.8243.12,782.029.117.2
Swiggy240.0566,2610.00-791.033.96,812.037.3-24.1
Urban Company162.7025,0910.00-92.1-1359.1528.343.9-7.8
Cartrade Tech2,866.3058.513,9340.0056.824.4201.216.311.8
Shiprocket128.609,3570.00-13.724.0592.133.8-2.7
Median199.4354.49,0560.004.529.1560.234.41.5

Competes with: AceVector Limited, Brainbees Solutions Limited, Cartrade Tech Limited, Digidrive Distributors Limited, ETERNAL LIMITED, Intrasoft Technologies Limited, Meesho Limited, RattanIndia Enterprises Limited, Rentomojo Limited, Shiprocket Limited, Swiggy Limited, Urban Company Limited

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales1,4221,5071,7891,6681,7461,8752,2672,0622,1552,3462,8732,6482,782
Expenses1,3481,4261,6901,5751,6501,7712,1261,9282,0142,1872,6442,4252,546
Material Cost1.283.330.342.218.734.14
Change in Inventories11-2549669-137-256
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade1,1401,4441,1971,5051,5731,758
Employee Cost174182183203204225
Other Expenses602639712865777815
Operating Profit7381999396104141133141159230223236
OPM %5.175.355.525.595.505.536.216.476.536.7888.428.48
Other Income7987756997-1099
Exceptional items (within Other Income)00-1.04-1600
Interest19212221212432303031292627
Depreciation52555860606470737679818489
Profit before tax10132620222145404455110122129
Tax %34303150363739524440383538
Net Profit58179141326192433687980
EPS in Rs0.010.020.060.020.030.040.090.070.080.120.220.270.28
Diluted EPS in Rs0.070.080.120.220.270.28

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales5741,1111,7682,4413,7745,1446,3867,95010,02210,649
Expenses6011,0911,6852,2833,6104,8876,0397,4759,2699,802
Material Cost8.1015
Change in Inventories-219-227
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade4,6835,719
Employee Cost666772
Other Expenses2,3372,992
Operating Profit-272183158164257347475753848
OPM %-4.601.904.7064.3055688
Other Income451012273030271515
Exceptional items (within Other Income)0-17
Interest7274632477684108117114
Depreciation731607296173224266320334
Profit before tax-37-32-1266473869127330416
Tax %-25-233171335374238
Net Profit-28-25-166241214072204259
EPS in Rs-3.47-2.87-1.906.820.140.070.110.230.700.89
Diluted EPS in Rs0.230.70
Dividend Payout %-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
—
5 years
33%
3 years
25%
TTM
27%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
—
5 years
28%
3 years
122%
TTM
234%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
—
5 years
—
3 years
32%
1 year
33%

Return on equity

10 years
—
5 years
6%
3 years
8%
Last year
15%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital1414151547285286286286
Reserves1082163074751,2921,0939771,0151,152
Borrowings833104133335937989691,3211,238
Other Liabilities1482353904797147731,1691,3581,936
Minority Interest4164
Total Liabilities3537761,1241,3022,6462,9503,4013,9804,611
Fixed Assets341402272314836996688351,008
CWIP0022243130379
Investments1013841-0383400
Other Assets3084978921,0672,1382,1822,6683,1083,594
Total Assets3537761,1241,3022,6462,9503,4013,9804,611

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity-79-1006133-354-1400467644
Cash from Investing Activity31-16215-130-603140-10-205-159
Cash from Financing Activity8223669-38927544-212-433
Net Cash Flow33-2690-34-304344952
Free Cash Flow-106-135-4091-448-348-110339492

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days45192011912141111
Inventory Days114135160122150128119116109
Days Payable123100113776234395249
Cash Conversion Cycle3554685697106947571
Working Capital Days0-16-53674010144
ROCE %-15137671017

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters525252525252525252525252
FIIs9.84111010109.058.831213121214
DIIs141517182224252425252524
Public242220191615141310101010
No. of Shareholders5,65,1915,08,9365,20,7884,79,3944,73,2134,84,2564,72,4624,36,3594,15,7234,16,7603,95,6773,83,806

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year +25.8% (₹264.11 → ₹332.30)Brick size ₹9.64 (fixed)Bricks 24
₹250₹300₹332Dec '25Mar '26Jun '26Sep '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹332.30 on 8 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

918inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-03-31

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)

17,57,939inr

2026-03-31

News

News and filings about FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

No recent news for this company.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

Buys from

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Consumer Services
Industry
E-Retail/ E-Commerce
Classification
Consumer Services › E-Retail/ E-Commerce
ISIN
INE388Y01029

Business segments

  • Beauty · 91%
  • Fashion · 8%
  • Others · 1%

News impact

Big market events that reach FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited, and how the effect spreads.

Who it hits first

  • Telangana food-safety officers suspended the licences of Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto dark stores after finding expired food, pest-infested articles and rotting vegetables.
  • A dark store is a small warehouse that packs 10-minute grocery deliveries, so a suspended licence means zero sales from that store until it passes re-inspection.
  • Swiggy is the only listed name directly hit, since Flipkart and Zepto are unlisted and carry no stock signal.

Who may gain

  • Avenue Supermarts, the DMART grocery-store chain, catches weekly baskets diverted from shut dark stores in Telangana neighbourhoods.
  • Vishal Mega Mart, the budget grocery and clothing retailer, picks up price-sensitive shoppers avoiding suspended quick-commerce apps.
  • No supplier or rider gains — snack makers lose a sales channel and delivery riders lose shifts while stores stay shut.
  • Flipkart and Zepto are unlisted, so their share of the pain carries no stock signal here.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Delivery riders attached to shut dark stores lose shifts and payouts, while shoppers fall back on kirana shops, DMART and Vishal Mega Mart for the weekly basket.

Upstream

Snack and staple suppliers that fed the shut stores — Bikaji Foods (packaged snacks) and KRBL (rice) are named Swiggy suppliers in the graph — lose a Telangana sales channel, though neither has a fundamentals row here so no signal can be written for them.

Where demand moves

Business

Grocery orders that flowed through Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto apps in Telangana reroute to DMART stores, Vishal Mega Mart outlets and kirana shops until licences return.

Capital

Investors mark down quick-commerce exposure on regulatory risk while nudging grocery-retail names up on the diverted demand, keeping food-delivery multiples under watch.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Quick-commerce and food-delivery names face licence and headline risk, QSR chains wear mild spillover scrutiny, while store-based grocers absorb the diverted weekly shop.

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

Pattern name

Crude Oil Cascade

Patterns

  • Crude Oil Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Cement
  • Chemicals
  • FMCG
  • Power

When it plays out

Immediate

In 1-7 days Swiggy slips on the headline while grocers firm; watch for the re-inspection schedule and any extension to other cities.

Medium term

In 1-6 months the episode fades if licences return fast, but a wider hygiene drive would raise compliance costs across quick commerce.

Short term

In 1-4 weeks QSR and delivery names trade on whether copycat raids appear in other states or the matter stays a Telangana-only cleanup.

Who it hits first

  • India's food safety authority (FSSAI) has named Amazon, Flipkart, Swiggy Instamart, Zepto and BigBasket in penal action over risky food listings.
  • The flagged items include Happilo date bites, Milky Mist dairy products and Dhatura (a toxic plant) fruits and seeds.
  • Named platforms face fines, delistings and tougher listing checks; among listed firms Swiggy (Instamart's owner) is directly hit.
  • Milky Mist, a listed dairy maker whose items were flagged, faces brand and recall risk.

Who may gain

  • Avenue Supermarts (DMart): shoppers worried about online food safety may shift to trusted offline stores.
  • Bikaji Foods: a rival snack brand could gain shelf space if Happilo listings are pulled, partly offset by sector-wide scrutiny.
  • Compliant food brands and testing labs: stricter checks reward clean supply chains.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream, delivery riders and dark-store operators see fewer orders on delisted items, while shoppers gain safer listings at the cost of narrower choice.

Upstream

Upstream, snack and dairy suppliers to quick commerce, including Bikaji Foods (a pack-listed Swiggy supplier), face extra compliance checks and possible order pauses on flagged lines.

Where demand moves

Business

Grocery demand may leak from quick-commerce apps toward offline stores and compliant sellers while flagged listings are delisted and checks tighten.

Capital

Capital is likely to shun the directly named platforms and the flagged dairy brand short-term, favouring profitable offline retail and unaffected staples.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Negative for food-delivery and quick-commerce platforms via fines and compliance costs; neutral for travel, hotels and edtech.

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

Negative for the flagged dairy brand; neutral-to-negative for packaged foods on wider FSSAI scrutiny; alcohol and personal care untouched.

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

Pattern name

Crude Oil Cascade

Patterns

  • Crude Oil Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Cement
  • Chemicals
  • FMCG
  • Power

When it plays out

Immediate

Named platforms and Milky Mist slip as fines, delistings and inspection headlines dominate the next few days.

Medium term

Over 1-6 months compliance upgrades and restored listings decide whether the damage was a blip or a lasting cost.

Short term

Over 1-4 weeks the fine quantum and any listing bans set the size of the hit; peers stay under watch.

Who it hits first

  • EaseMyTrip faces ~10% pledge-supply overhang plus forced-sale risk on any margin call.
  • Small travel peers (Yatra, Ixigo, TBO) derate on sentiment contagion despite clean holdings.
  • Consumer-services small-caps broadly soften as promoter-finance headlines spook the tape.

Who may gain

  • Zero-pledge travel peers (Ixigo, Yatra, TBO) may attract rotation once the dust settles.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Travelers and agents see zero impact; bookings, refunds and service run normally.

Upstream

No direct supply-chain link — a promoter-financing event, not an operations event.

Where demand moves

Business

No business-demand impact — travel bookings do not change on promoter financing; this is purely a share-supply event.

Capital

Money exits EaseMyTrip on overhang fears; trims small travel broadly; rotates to clean-holding peers on dips.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Online-travel sub-segment derates on pledge contagion; wider consumer-services mood softens.

When it plays out

Immediate

EaseMyTrip down 3-6% on overhang; travel peers dip 1-3% on association.

Medium term

Pledge stays an overhang until released; company must grow into a derated multiple.

Short term

Shareholding filings confirm the final pledged tally; any release filing reverses part of the fall.

Who it hits first

  • Quick-commerce and food-delivery platforms (Eternal/Zomato, Swiggy) face listing and discount curbs
  • Nykaa's beauty marketplace playbook of brand-funded discounts needs rework
  • Large sellers lose preferential search placement; small sellers gain visibility

Who may gain

  • Small and offline sellers gain a level playing field on search and pricing
  • Compliant large FMCG brands (ITC, HUL) lose less than discount-led rivals

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Consumers see fewer deep discounts but more genuine prices; order volumes dip mildly before stabilising.

Upstream

No supply-chain disruption — sellers keep supplying; only promotion economics and listing rules change.

Where demand moves

Business

Platforms must rewire search ranking, sponsored-label disclosures and discount funding; sellers renegotiate who funds promotions; logistics demand is unaffected but per-order economics tighten.

Capital

Money trims high-multiple platform stocks (Eternal, Nykaa, Swiggy) and rotates to profitable FMCG sellers that benefit from cleaner competition.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

quick-commerce and food delivery absorb compliance cost; growth-over-profit models questioned

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

big brands gain share as discount-led small labels lose placement edge

When it plays out

Immediate

Platform stocks de-rate on regulatory overhang; FMCG largely unmoved.

Medium term

Cleaner competition favours profitable sellers; platforms pass compliance cost via take rates within a year.

Short term

Watch platform disclosures on compliance readiness and any extension lobbying before Jan 1.

9 Aug, 04:35 IST · Market event · medium impact

UPDATE: Finance Ministry narrows the UPI merchant-fee plan - consumers and the vast majority of merchants stay free, with MDR applying only to select large merchants

The government says ordinary people and most shops will never pay a fee on UPI payments - only a small set of big merchants might - which means the new income that payment companies were expecting from this week's law is far smaller than the market assumed.

Financial ServicesConsumer ServicesTelecommunication

Who it hits first

  • Consumer-facing payment apps - Paytm, MobiKwik - get a far smaller monetisable base than the 6 August Bill implied, because person-to-person and small-merchant transactions stay free
  • Large-merchant acquirers such as Pine Labs are the only payment businesses positioned inside the chargeable segment
  • Large digital merchants - quick commerce, food delivery, online marketplaces, organised retail - face a possible new cost line on high transaction volumes
  • Acquiring banks would collect the fee where it applies, a small positive that is immaterial against their overall lending income

Who may gain

  • Consumers and small merchants, who are explicitly protected and keep using UPI free
  • Large-merchant acquirers such as Pine Labs, positioned on the chargeable side of the line
  • Acquiring banks, which would earn the fee where it is levied, though the amount is trivial relative to their lending income

Along the supply chain

Downstream

The merchants are the customers here. Small merchants - kirana stores, street vendors, service providers - are explicitly protected and see no change, which preserves UPI's reach. Large merchants that do fall inside the chargeable set will push the cost back either by steering buyers to their own wallets and cards or by negotiating with acquirers, so the eventual incidence of the fee is likely to be shared rather than borne wholly by the merchant.

Upstream

UPI runs on NPCI's rails with banks providing the accounts and settlement. Because the government has confirmed most transactions stay free, banks continue to carry the processing cost without a matching fee, which is why they have lobbied for MDR in the first place. The narrowed rule means their cost-recovery is partial, so the incentive to under-invest in UPI capacity relative to card rails remains.

Where demand moves

Business

Payment volume itself does not change - UPI stays free for the people making almost all of it. What changes is where value is created. The revenue the market expected to flow from merchants to payment companies has been cut to a narrow slice at the top of the merchant pyramid. Consumer-facing wallets, whose volume sits mostly in the free segments, capture almost none of it; large-merchant acquirers capture what little there is. On the merchant side, the cost lands only on the biggest platforms, who will respond by steering customers toward payment rails they control or negotiating fee terms.

Capital

Money leaves the payment names that were re-rated on the 6 August Bill, because the earnings upgrade that justified the move no longer exists at the assumed size. It does not rotate into large-merchant acquirers in any size either, because those businesses fail basic quality screens - Pine Labs earns 2.46% on shareholder money against a Financial Services sector ROE median of 11.05%. The most likely outcome is that the money simply exits the payments theme rather than rotating within it.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Large digital merchants - quick commerce, food delivery, marketplaces - may face a new per-transaction cost

Financial Services

Cuts the expected MDR revenue pool for fintechs and acquiring banks to a narrow top-of-market slice

Telecommunication

Telco-linked payment arms see little change, since their volume sits in the protected segments

codex additions

When it plays out

Immediate

Expect the payment names that re-rated on the 6 August Bill to give back part of that move, with Paytm most exposed given its PE of 112.99 against a Financial Services sector PE median of 20.43.

Medium term

Over one to six months, if MDR is genuinely confined to a narrow band, the payment industry's route to profitability stays dependent on lending and cross-selling rather than on transaction fees. That keeps the pressure on the fintechs whose valuations already assume a fee-driven model.

Short term

Over one to four weeks the definition of a 'select large merchant' is the whole story. Watch for the notification that sets the turnover threshold - a low threshold would restore much of the revenue pool, a high one confirms this is a token measure.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Selective MDR on large merchants increases demand for payment-routing, reconciliation, fraud controls, POS integration and cost-optimization software among enterprise merchants and banks.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and project-led, not a broad sector rerating driver.","sector":"Information Technology","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Large organized retailers are more likely to fall inside the chargeable merchant set, creating a small new payments cost line or incentive to steer customers toward lower-cost rails.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DMART","TRENT","V2RETAIL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact depends on threshold definition and ability to pass costs to suppliers or customers.","sector":"Retail","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Large chain restaurants, food-service operators and delivery-linked merchants may face MDR on high-volume UPI collections, modestly pressuring transaction margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","SAPPHIRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Consumer UPI remains free, so demand impact should be limited; margin impact is the main channel.","sector":"Restaurants and Food Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Airlines, hotels and online travel-facing large merchants process high-ticket digital payments; selective MDR could raise payment acceptance costs and encourage payment-mode steering.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","EIHOTEL","CHALET"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Higher ticket sizes make MDR visibility greater, but final rules may exempt many merchant categories.","sector":"Travel and Hospitality","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Large online marketplaces and platform merchants are likely candidates for MDR applicability, reducing contribution margins or increasing reliance on wallet, card, net-banking or co-branded payment incentives.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["NYKAA","INDIAMART","MSTCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most listed exposure is partial; direct quick-commerce names may be limited on NSE.","sector":"E-commerce and Internet Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"If large modern-trade and distributor payments face MDR, retailers may seek supplier support, better trade terms or payment discounts, indirectly affecting FMCG channel economics.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HINDUNILVR","NESTLEIND","BRITANNIA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative through retailer cost pass-through pressure; positive if digital payment persistence improves working-capital visibility.","sector":"FMCG and Consumer Staples Distribution","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Fuel retailers handle very high transaction volumes and low-margin sales; if classified as large merchants, UPI MDR could pressure retail outlet economics or revive payment-mode steering.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regulatory treatment of fuel payments is often specific, so applicability is uncertain.","sector":"Oil Marketing and Fuel Retail","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Merchants trying to optimize payment acceptance may invest in smarter POS terminals, QR orchestration, billing integration and multi-rail acceptance infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["HONAUT","KAYNES","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Link is second-order and depends on whether MDR creates enough incentive to upgrade payment infrastructure.","sector":"Capital Goods and POS Hardware","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Large merchants facing UPI MDR may adjust cash-on-delivery, prepaid incentives, reconciliation flows and refund handling, affecting logistics partners tied to e-commerce and retail payment workflows.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["DELHIVERY","TCI","BLUEDART"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Could be positive if prepaid digital payments remain attractive versus COD, but negative if platforms cut logistics subsidies to offset MDR.","sector":"Logistics and Delivery Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

10 Nov 2022bonus₹0

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.