FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited
NSE: NYKAAE-Retail/ E-Commerce
Share price
₹332.30
-2.62% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
71
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹95,038 Cr
P/E ratio
357.3
P/B ratio
66.2
ROCE
17.2%
ROE
15.3%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 27.4% over the past year, and 29.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 4.4% to 7.9% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 29.0% a year against a sector median of 13.9% — 15.1 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 2.9 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 122%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited — this one | 122%/yr | 357.3× | — |
| ETERNAL LIMITED | 28%/yr | — | — |
| Meesho Limited | 6%/yr | — | — |
| Swiggy Limited | 0%/yr | — | — |
| Urban Company Limited | 8%/yr | — | — |
| Cartrade Tech Limited | 89%/yr | 57.0× | ₹0.64 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (E-Retail/ E-Commerce), it ranks 2 of 12 on returns, 6 of 11 on growth, 3 of 12 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 17.2% on capital, ahead of 83% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹617 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹692 crore on plant and equipment, ₹75 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹593 crore to ₹1238 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 9 years, about 156 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 67 days for its cash to waiting 4 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
8 of 9 checks clear · 89%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue grew 29% and profit more than tripled as Beauty and Fashion both accelerated.
Announced 4 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹2,782 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+29.1%
Revenue vs last quarter
+5.1%
Net profit
₹80 Cr
Profit vs last year
+232.3%
Profit vs last quarter
+1.0%
Net margin
2.9%
EPS
₹0.28
Earnings call transcript · 4 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹95,038 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹332.30
- 52w High
- ₹350
- 52w Low
- ₹232
- Enterprise value
- ₹95,956 Cr
- Beta
- 0.8
- Price CAGR 1y
- 33.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 32.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- —
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 4.4%
- PEG ratio
- 2.9
- P/E ratio
- 357.3
- P/B ratio
- 66.2
- EV / EBITDA
- 113.2
- Industry P/E
- 57.2
- ROCE
- 17.2%
- ROCE 5y average
- 9.4%
- ROE
- 15.3%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.9
- Interest coverage
- 3.8
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 8.0%
- ROE last year
- 15.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹10,022 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹204 Cr
- Operating margin
- 8.0%
- Net profit margin
- 2.0%
- EBITDA margin
- 7.5%
- Sales growth 3y
- 24.9%
- Sales growth 5y
- 32.6%
- Profit growth 3y
- 122.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 28.0%
- EPS
- ₹0.7
- Sales growth TTM
- 27.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 234.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹2,782 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹80 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 29.1%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 233.3%
- OPM latest quarter
- 8.5%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹5.0
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹1,238 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹320 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹1,238 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 4.0
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹644 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹493 Cr
- FCF yield
- 0.4%
- Net cash flow
- ₹52 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 52.1%
- FII holding
- 13.7%
- DII holding
- 24.1%
- Public holding
- 10.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eternal | 323.60 | 721.2 | 3,12,285 | 0.00 | 92.0 | 268.0 | 20,211.0 | 182.0 | 2.5 |
| Meesho | 231.15 | 1,06,988 | 0.00 | -132.8 | 38.5 | 3,712.8 | 48.3 | -40.0 | |
| FSN E-Commerce | 339.45 | 365.3 | 97,229 | 0.00 | 79.8 | 243.1 | 2,782.0 | 29.1 | 17.2 |
| Swiggy | 240.05 | 66,261 | 0.00 | -791.0 | 33.9 | 6,812.0 | 37.3 | -24.1 | |
| Urban Company | 162.70 | 25,091 | 0.00 | -92.1 | -1359.1 | 528.3 | 43.9 | -7.8 | |
| Cartrade Tech | 2,866.30 | 58.5 | 13,934 | 0.00 | 56.8 | 24.4 | 201.2 | 16.3 | 11.8 |
| Shiprocket | 128.60 | 9,357 | 0.00 | -13.7 | 24.0 | 592.1 | 33.8 | -2.7 | |
| Median | 199.43 | 54.4 | 9,056 | 0.00 | 4.5 | 29.1 | 560.2 | 34.4 | 1.5 |
Competes with: AceVector Limited, Brainbees Solutions Limited, Cartrade Tech Limited, Digidrive Distributors Limited, ETERNAL LIMITED, Intrasoft Technologies Limited, Meesho Limited, RattanIndia Enterprises Limited, Rentomojo Limited, Shiprocket Limited, Swiggy Limited, Urban Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,422 | 1,507 | 1,789 | 1,668 | 1,746 | 1,875 | 2,267 | 2,062 | 2,155 | 2,346 | 2,873 | 2,648 | 2,782 |
| Expenses | 1,348 | 1,426 | 1,690 | 1,575 | 1,650 | 1,771 | 2,126 | 1,928 | 2,014 | 2,187 | 2,644 | 2,425 | 2,546 |
| Material Cost | 1.28 | 3.33 | 0.34 | 2.21 | 8.73 | 4.14 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 11 | -254 | 96 | 69 | -137 | -256 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 1,140 | 1,444 | 1,197 | 1,505 | 1,573 | 1,758 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 174 | 182 | 183 | 203 | 204 | 225 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 602 | 639 | 712 | 865 | 777 | 815 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 73 | 81 | 99 | 93 | 96 | 104 | 141 | 133 | 141 | 159 | 230 | 223 | 236 |
| OPM % | 5.17 | 5.35 | 5.52 | 5.59 | 5.50 | 5.53 | 6.21 | 6.47 | 6.53 | 6.78 | 8 | 8.42 | 8.48 |
| Other Income | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 7 | -10 | 9 | 9 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | -1.04 | -16 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 19 | 21 | 22 | 21 | 21 | 24 | 32 | 30 | 30 | 31 | 29 | 26 | 27 |
| Depreciation | 52 | 55 | 58 | 60 | 60 | 64 | 70 | 73 | 76 | 79 | 81 | 84 | 89 |
| Profit before tax | 10 | 13 | 26 | 20 | 22 | 21 | 45 | 40 | 44 | 55 | 110 | 122 | 129 |
| Tax % | 34 | 30 | 31 | 50 | 36 | 37 | 39 | 52 | 44 | 40 | 38 | 35 | 38 |
| Net Profit | 5 | 8 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 13 | 26 | 19 | 24 | 33 | 68 | 79 | 80 |
| EPS in Rs | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.28 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 574 | 1,111 | 1,768 | 2,441 | 3,774 | 5,144 | 6,386 | 7,950 | 10,022 | 10,649 |
| Expenses | 601 | 1,091 | 1,685 | 2,283 | 3,610 | 4,887 | 6,039 | 7,475 | 9,269 | 9,802 |
| Material Cost | 8.10 | 15 | ||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -219 | -227 | ||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 4,683 | 5,719 | ||||||||
| Employee Cost | 666 | 772 | ||||||||
| Other Expenses | 2,337 | 2,992 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | -27 | 21 | 83 | 158 | 164 | 257 | 347 | 475 | 753 | 848 |
| OPM % | -4.60 | 1.90 | 4.70 | 6 | 4.30 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| Other Income | 4 | 5 | 10 | 12 | 27 | 30 | 30 | 27 | 15 | 15 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -17 | ||||||||
| Interest | 7 | 27 | 46 | 32 | 47 | 76 | 84 | 108 | 117 | 114 |
| Depreciation | 7 | 31 | 60 | 72 | 96 | 173 | 224 | 266 | 320 | 334 |
| Profit before tax | -37 | -32 | -12 | 66 | 47 | 38 | 69 | 127 | 330 | 416 |
| Tax % | -25 | -23 | 31 | 7 | 13 | 35 | 37 | 42 | 38 | |
| Net Profit | -28 | -25 | -16 | 62 | 41 | 21 | 40 | 72 | 204 | 259 |
| EPS in Rs | -3.47 | -2.87 | -1.90 | 6.82 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.89 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.23 | 0.70 | ||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 | -0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 33%
- 3 years
- 25%
- TTM
- 27%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 28%
- 3 years
- 122%
- TTM
- 234%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 32%
- 1 year
- 33%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 6%
- 3 years
- 8%
- Last year
- 15%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 14 | 14 | 15 | 15 | 47 | 285 | 286 | 286 | 286 |
| Reserves | 108 | 216 | 307 | 475 | 1,292 | 1,093 | 977 | 1,015 | 1,152 |
| Borrowings | 83 | 310 | 413 | 333 | 593 | 798 | 969 | 1,321 | 1,238 |
| Other Liabilities | 148 | 235 | 390 | 479 | 714 | 773 | 1,169 | 1,358 | 1,936 |
| Minority Interest | 41 | 64 | |||||||
| Total Liabilities | 353 | 776 | 1,124 | 1,302 | 2,646 | 2,950 | 3,401 | 3,980 | 4,611 |
| Fixed Assets | 34 | 140 | 227 | 231 | 483 | 699 | 668 | 835 | 1,008 |
| CWIP | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 24 | 31 | 30 | 37 | 9 |
| Investments | 10 | 138 | 4 | 1 | -0 | 38 | 34 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 308 | 497 | 892 | 1,067 | 2,138 | 2,182 | 2,668 | 3,108 | 3,594 |
| Total Assets | 353 | 776 | 1,124 | 1,302 | 2,646 | 2,950 | 3,401 | 3,980 | 4,611 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -79 | -100 | 6 | 133 | -354 | -140 | 0 | 467 | 644 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 31 | -162 | 15 | -130 | -603 | 140 | -10 | -205 | -159 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 82 | 236 | 69 | -38 | 927 | 5 | 44 | -212 | -433 |
| Net Cash Flow | 33 | -26 | 90 | -34 | -30 | 4 | 34 | 49 | 52 |
| Free Cash Flow | -106 | -135 | -40 | 91 | -448 | -348 | -110 | 339 | 492 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 45 | 19 | 20 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 |
| Inventory Days | 114 | 135 | 160 | 122 | 150 | 128 | 119 | 116 | 109 |
| Days Payable | 123 | 100 | 113 | 77 | 62 | 34 | 39 | 52 | 49 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 35 | 54 | 68 | 56 | 97 | 106 | 94 | 75 | 71 |
| Working Capital Days | 0 | -16 | -5 | 3 | 67 | 40 | 10 | 14 | 4 |
| ROCE % | -1 | 5 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 10 | 17 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
918inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
17,57,939inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Buys from
- Brand Concepts Limited · bags, travel gear and fashion accessories sold through the platform; FY25 AR: 'strong part…
- Campus Activewear Limited · sports & athleisure footwear via online marketplace
- Delhivery Limited · E-commerce logistics services
- Honasa Consumer Limited · Beauty & personal care finished goods (Mamaearth, The Derma Co.) sold via Nykaa marketplac…
- Monte Carlo Fashions Limited · Branded Monte Carlo apparel
- Nandani Creation Limited · Jaipur Kurti women's ethnic wear - online marketplace; nandanicreation.com/about-us.php: '…
- Redtape Limited · footwear, garments & accessories via Nykaa Fashion marketplace
- Shadowfax Technologies Limited · E-commerce logistics services
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Consumer Services
- Industry
- E-Retail/ E-Commerce
- Classification
- Consumer Services › E-Retail/ E-Commerce
- ISIN
- INE388Y01029
Business segments
- Beauty · 91%
- Fashion · 8%
- Others · 1%
News impact
Big market events that reach FSN E-Commerce Ventures Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 12:36 IST · Market event · medium impact
Food Safety Crackdown: Licences Of Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart, Zepto Dark Stores Suspended In Telangana
Telangana shut Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto dark stores over rotten food and pests, hurting Swiggy and clouding food stocks while nearby grocers pick up the slack.
Who it hits first
- Telangana food-safety officers suspended the licences of Swiggy Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto dark stores after finding expired food, pest-infested articles and rotting vegetables.
- A dark store is a small warehouse that packs 10-minute grocery deliveries, so a suspended licence means zero sales from that store until it passes re-inspection.
- Swiggy is the only listed name directly hit, since Flipkart and Zepto are unlisted and carry no stock signal.
Who may gain
- Avenue Supermarts, the DMART grocery-store chain, catches weekly baskets diverted from shut dark stores in Telangana neighbourhoods.
- Vishal Mega Mart, the budget grocery and clothing retailer, picks up price-sensitive shoppers avoiding suspended quick-commerce apps.
- No supplier or rider gains — snack makers lose a sales channel and delivery riders lose shifts while stores stay shut.
- Flipkart and Zepto are unlisted, so their share of the pain carries no stock signal here.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Delivery riders attached to shut dark stores lose shifts and payouts, while shoppers fall back on kirana shops, DMART and Vishal Mega Mart for the weekly basket.
Upstream
Snack and staple suppliers that fed the shut stores — Bikaji Foods (packaged snacks) and KRBL (rice) are named Swiggy suppliers in the graph — lose a Telangana sales channel, though neither has a fundamentals row here so no signal can be written for them.
Where demand moves
Business
Grocery orders that flowed through Instamart, Flipkart and Zepto apps in Telangana reroute to DMART stores, Vishal Mega Mart outlets and kirana shops until licences return.
Capital
Investors mark down quick-commerce exposure on regulatory risk while nudging grocery-retail names up on the diverted demand, keeping food-delivery multiples under watch.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Quick-commerce and food-delivery names face licence and headline risk, QSR chains wear mild spillover scrutiny, while store-based grocers absorb the diverted weekly shop.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Patterns
- Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Cement
- Chemicals
- FMCG
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days Swiggy slips on the headline while grocers firm; watch for the re-inspection schedule and any extension to other cities.
Medium term
In 1-6 months the episode fades if licences return fast, but a wider hygiene drive would raise compliance costs across quick commerce.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks QSR and delivery names trade on whether copycat raids appear in other states or the matter stays a Telangana-only cleanup.
23 Sept, 22:02 IST · Market event · medium impact
Amazon, Instamart, BigBasket, Flipkart, Zepto Face Penal Action Over Happilo Dates, Dhatura Sales
India's food safety body is punishing quick-delivery apps and sellers over risky food listings, hurting Swiggy and dairy maker Milky Mist with fines and checks while offline stores may gain shoppers.
Who it hits first
- India's food safety authority (FSSAI) has named Amazon, Flipkart, Swiggy Instamart, Zepto and BigBasket in penal action over risky food listings.
- The flagged items include Happilo date bites, Milky Mist dairy products and Dhatura (a toxic plant) fruits and seeds.
- Named platforms face fines, delistings and tougher listing checks; among listed firms Swiggy (Instamart's owner) is directly hit.
- Milky Mist, a listed dairy maker whose items were flagged, faces brand and recall risk.
Who may gain
- Avenue Supermarts (DMart): shoppers worried about online food safety may shift to trusted offline stores.
- Bikaji Foods: a rival snack brand could gain shelf space if Happilo listings are pulled, partly offset by sector-wide scrutiny.
- Compliant food brands and testing labs: stricter checks reward clean supply chains.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, delivery riders and dark-store operators see fewer orders on delisted items, while shoppers gain safer listings at the cost of narrower choice.
Upstream
Upstream, snack and dairy suppliers to quick commerce, including Bikaji Foods (a pack-listed Swiggy supplier), face extra compliance checks and possible order pauses on flagged lines.
Where demand moves
Business
Grocery demand may leak from quick-commerce apps toward offline stores and compliant sellers while flagged listings are delisted and checks tighten.
Capital
Capital is likely to shun the directly named platforms and the flagged dairy brand short-term, favouring profitable offline retail and unaffected staples.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Negative for food-delivery and quick-commerce platforms via fines and compliance costs; neutral for travel, hotels and edtech.
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Negative for the flagged dairy brand; neutral-to-negative for packaged foods on wider FSSAI scrutiny; alcohol and personal care untouched.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Patterns
- Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Cement
- Chemicals
- FMCG
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
Named platforms and Milky Mist slip as fines, delistings and inspection headlines dominate the next few days.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months compliance upgrades and restored listings decide whether the damage was a blip or a lasting cost.
Short term
Over 1-4 weeks the fine quantum and any listing bans set the size of the hit; peers stay under watch.
15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · medium impact
EaseMyTrip co-founder pledges 34.51cr shares to Motilal Oswal Financial Services
A founder of travel website EaseMyTrip has pawned a tenth of the company for a loan — a red flag that usually pushes the shares down.
Who it hits first
- EaseMyTrip faces ~10% pledge-supply overhang plus forced-sale risk on any margin call.
- Small travel peers (Yatra, Ixigo, TBO) derate on sentiment contagion despite clean holdings.
- Consumer-services small-caps broadly soften as promoter-finance headlines spook the tape.
Who may gain
- Zero-pledge travel peers (Ixigo, Yatra, TBO) may attract rotation once the dust settles.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Travelers and agents see zero impact; bookings, refunds and service run normally.
Upstream
No direct supply-chain link — a promoter-financing event, not an operations event.
Where demand moves
Business
No business-demand impact — travel bookings do not change on promoter financing; this is purely a share-supply event.
Capital
Money exits EaseMyTrip on overhang fears; trims small travel broadly; rotates to clean-holding peers on dips.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Online-travel sub-segment derates on pledge contagion; wider consumer-services mood softens.
When it plays out
Immediate
EaseMyTrip down 3-6% on overhang; travel peers dip 1-3% on association.
Medium term
Pledge stays an overhang until released; company must grow into a derated multiple.
Short term
Shareholding filings confirm the final pledged tally; any release filing reverses part of the fall.
11 Sept, 04:38 IST · Market event · medium impact
Centre amends e-commerce rules on fake discounts, search ranking and sponsored listings; norms effective Jan 1
India tightened online-shopping rules on discounts and listings from January, raising compliance costs for Swiggy, Zomato and Nykaa while levelling the field for small sellers.
Who it hits first
- Quick-commerce and food-delivery platforms (Eternal/Zomato, Swiggy) face listing and discount curbs
- Nykaa's beauty marketplace playbook of brand-funded discounts needs rework
- Large sellers lose preferential search placement; small sellers gain visibility
Who may gain
- Small and offline sellers gain a level playing field on search and pricing
- Compliant large FMCG brands (ITC, HUL) lose less than discount-led rivals
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Consumers see fewer deep discounts but more genuine prices; order volumes dip mildly before stabilising.
Upstream
No supply-chain disruption — sellers keep supplying; only promotion economics and listing rules change.
Where demand moves
Business
Platforms must rewire search ranking, sponsored-label disclosures and discount funding; sellers renegotiate who funds promotions; logistics demand is unaffected but per-order economics tighten.
Capital
Money trims high-multiple platform stocks (Eternal, Nykaa, Swiggy) and rotates to profitable FMCG sellers that benefit from cleaner competition.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
quick-commerce and food delivery absorb compliance cost; growth-over-profit models questioned
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
big brands gain share as discount-led small labels lose placement edge
When it plays out
Immediate
Platform stocks de-rate on regulatory overhang; FMCG largely unmoved.
Medium term
Cleaner competition favours profitable sellers; platforms pass compliance cost via take rates within a year.
Short term
Watch platform disclosures on compliance readiness and any extension lobbying before Jan 1.
9 Aug, 04:35 IST · Market event · medium impact
UPDATE: Finance Ministry narrows the UPI merchant-fee plan - consumers and the vast majority of merchants stay free, with MDR applying only to select large merchants
The government says ordinary people and most shops will never pay a fee on UPI payments - only a small set of big merchants might - which means the new income that payment companies were expecting from this week's law is far smaller than the market assumed.
Who it hits first
- Consumer-facing payment apps - Paytm, MobiKwik - get a far smaller monetisable base than the 6 August Bill implied, because person-to-person and small-merchant transactions stay free
- Large-merchant acquirers such as Pine Labs are the only payment businesses positioned inside the chargeable segment
- Large digital merchants - quick commerce, food delivery, online marketplaces, organised retail - face a possible new cost line on high transaction volumes
- Acquiring banks would collect the fee where it applies, a small positive that is immaterial against their overall lending income
Who may gain
- Consumers and small merchants, who are explicitly protected and keep using UPI free
- Large-merchant acquirers such as Pine Labs, positioned on the chargeable side of the line
- Acquiring banks, which would earn the fee where it is levied, though the amount is trivial relative to their lending income
Along the supply chain
Downstream
The merchants are the customers here. Small merchants - kirana stores, street vendors, service providers - are explicitly protected and see no change, which preserves UPI's reach. Large merchants that do fall inside the chargeable set will push the cost back either by steering buyers to their own wallets and cards or by negotiating with acquirers, so the eventual incidence of the fee is likely to be shared rather than borne wholly by the merchant.
Upstream
UPI runs on NPCI's rails with banks providing the accounts and settlement. Because the government has confirmed most transactions stay free, banks continue to carry the processing cost without a matching fee, which is why they have lobbied for MDR in the first place. The narrowed rule means their cost-recovery is partial, so the incentive to under-invest in UPI capacity relative to card rails remains.
Where demand moves
Business
Payment volume itself does not change - UPI stays free for the people making almost all of it. What changes is where value is created. The revenue the market expected to flow from merchants to payment companies has been cut to a narrow slice at the top of the merchant pyramid. Consumer-facing wallets, whose volume sits mostly in the free segments, capture almost none of it; large-merchant acquirers capture what little there is. On the merchant side, the cost lands only on the biggest platforms, who will respond by steering customers toward payment rails they control or negotiating fee terms.
Capital
Money leaves the payment names that were re-rated on the 6 August Bill, because the earnings upgrade that justified the move no longer exists at the assumed size. It does not rotate into large-merchant acquirers in any size either, because those businesses fail basic quality screens - Pine Labs earns 2.46% on shareholder money against a Financial Services sector ROE median of 11.05%. The most likely outcome is that the money simply exits the payments theme rather than rotating within it.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Large digital merchants - quick commerce, food delivery, marketplaces - may face a new per-transaction cost
Financial Services
Cuts the expected MDR revenue pool for fintechs and acquiring banks to a narrow top-of-market slice
Telecommunication
Telco-linked payment arms see little change, since their volume sits in the protected segments
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect the payment names that re-rated on the 6 August Bill to give back part of that move, with Paytm most exposed given its PE of 112.99 against a Financial Services sector PE median of 20.43.
Medium term
Over one to six months, if MDR is genuinely confined to a narrow band, the payment industry's route to profitability stays dependent on lending and cross-selling rather than on transaction fees. That keeps the pressure on the fintechs whose valuations already assume a fee-driven model.
Short term
Over one to four weeks the definition of a 'select large merchant' is the whole story. Watch for the notification that sets the turnover threshold - a low threshold would restore much of the revenue pool, a high one confirms this is a token measure.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Selective MDR on large merchants increases demand for payment-routing, reconciliation, fraud controls, POS integration and cost-optimization software among enterprise merchants and banks.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and project-led, not a broad sector rerating driver.","sector":"Information Technology","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large organized retailers are more likely to fall inside the chargeable merchant set, creating a small new payments cost line or incentive to steer customers toward lower-cost rails.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DMART","TRENT","V2RETAIL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact depends on threshold definition and ability to pass costs to suppliers or customers.","sector":"Retail","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large chain restaurants, food-service operators and delivery-linked merchants may face MDR on high-volume UPI collections, modestly pressuring transaction margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","SAPPHIRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Consumer UPI remains free, so demand impact should be limited; margin impact is the main channel.","sector":"Restaurants and Food Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Airlines, hotels and online travel-facing large merchants process high-ticket digital payments; selective MDR could raise payment acceptance costs and encourage payment-mode steering.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","EIHOTEL","CHALET"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Higher ticket sizes make MDR visibility greater, but final rules may exempt many merchant categories.","sector":"Travel and Hospitality","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large online marketplaces and platform merchants are likely candidates for MDR applicability, reducing contribution margins or increasing reliance on wallet, card, net-banking or co-branded payment incentives.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["NYKAA","INDIAMART","MSTCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most listed exposure is partial; direct quick-commerce names may be limited on NSE.","sector":"E-commerce and Internet Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If large modern-trade and distributor payments face MDR, retailers may seek supplier support, better trade terms or payment discounts, indirectly affecting FMCG channel economics.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HINDUNILVR","NESTLEIND","BRITANNIA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative through retailer cost pass-through pressure; positive if digital payment persistence improves working-capital visibility.","sector":"FMCG and Consumer Staples Distribution","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Fuel retailers handle very high transaction volumes and low-margin sales; if classified as large merchants, UPI MDR could pressure retail outlet economics or revive payment-mode steering.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regulatory treatment of fuel payments is often specific, so applicability is uncertain.","sector":"Oil Marketing and Fuel Retail","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Merchants trying to optimize payment acceptance may invest in smarter POS terminals, QR orchestration, billing integration and multi-rail acceptance infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["HONAUT","KAYNES","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Link is second-order and depends on whether MDR creates enough incentive to upgrade payment infrastructure.","sector":"Capital Goods and POS Hardware","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large merchants facing UPI MDR may adjust cash-on-delivery, prepaid incentives, reconciliation flows and refund handling, affecting logistics partners tied to e-commerce and retail payment workflows.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["DELHIVERY","TCI","BLUEDART"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Could be positive if prepaid digital payments remain attractive versus COD, but negative if platforms cut logistics subsidies to offset MDR.","sector":"Logistics and Delivery Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 10 Nov 2022 | bonus | ₹0 |
|---|
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call · Q1FY274 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-261 Aug 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2621 May 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY265 Feb 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.