Gokaldas Exports Limited
NSE: GOKEXGarments & Apparels
Share price
₹667.70
+2.35% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
40
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹4,941 Cr
P/E ratio
48.0
P/B ratio
2.3
ROCE
7.7%
ROE
3.1%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 7.7% over the past year, and 21.8% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 12.0% to 8.8% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 21.8% a year against a sector median of 7.2% — 14.6 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 48.0× earnings it costs 2.0× the market, which pays 24.1× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 37.7×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 42.1×, the 70th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gokaldas Exports Limited — this one | -25%/yr | 48.0× | — |
| Page Industries Limited | 11%/yr | 53.6× | ₹4.9 |
| Arvind Limited | 6%/yr | 30.5× | ₹5.1 |
| Pearl Global Industries Limited | 25%/yr | 37.7× | ₹1.5 |
| Lux Industries Limited | -9%/yr | 31.9× | — |
| SBC Exports Limited | 54%/yr | 78.9× | ₹1.5 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Garments & Apparels), it ranks 23 of 34 on returns, 2 of 32 on growth, 16 of 34 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 7.7% on capital, ahead of 32% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹418 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹1303 crore on plant and equipment, ₹885 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹193 crore to ₹1273 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 112 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 55 days for its cash to waiting 30 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
5 of 9 checks clear · 56%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue grew 21% year on year, with management now saying full-year growth should be better than the earlier 15%-plus target.
Announced 11 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹1,154 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+20.7%
Revenue vs last quarter
+7.9%
Net profit
₹44 Cr
Profit vs last year
+8.0%
Profit vs last quarter
+23.1%
Net margin
3.8%
EPS
₹6.05
Earnings call transcript · 12 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹4,941 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹667.70
- 52w High
- ₹955
- 52w Low
- ₹531
- Enterprise value
- ₹5,789 Cr
- Beta
- 1.5
- Price CAGR 1y
- -8.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- -4.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 25.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 23.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 2.3%
- PEG ratio
- -1.9
- P/E ratio
- 48.0
- P/B ratio
- 2.3
- EV / EBITDA
- 15.6
- Industry P/E
- 21.2
- ROCE
- 7.7%
- ROCE 5y average
- 13.8%
- ROE
- 3.1%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.6
- Interest coverage
- 2.8
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 6.0%
- ROE last year
- 3.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹3,988 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹100 Cr
- Operating margin
- 9.0%
- Net profit margin
- 2.5%
- EBITDA margin
- 9.0%
- Sales growth 3y
- 21.5%
- Sales growth 5y
- 26.9%
- Profit growth 3y
- -25.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 21.0%
- EPS
- ₹13.7
- Sales growth TTM
- 8.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -40.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹1,154 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹44 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 20.7%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 7.3%
- OPM latest quarter
- 9.8%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹292
- Face Value
- ₹5.0
- Total debt
- ₹1,273 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹136 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹1,273 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 57.4
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹52 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹170 Cr
- FCF yield
- -5.4%
- Net cash flow
- -₹30 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 9.2%
- FII holding
- 14.5%
- DII holding
- 43.4%
- Public holding
- 33.0%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page Industries | 37,570.00 | 53.6 | 41,905 | 1.46 | 192.8 | -4.0 | 1,420.5 | 7.9 | 64.4 |
| Arvind Ltd | 529.30 | 32.8 | 14,399 | 0.85 | 57.8 | 25.9 | 2,501.0 | 24.6 | 14.7 |
| Pearl Global Ind | 1,273.10 | 37.5 | 11,761 | 0.57 | 99.2 | 50.9 | 1,528.3 | 24.5 | 19.9 |
| Gokaldas Exports | 673.00 | 47.9 | 4,932 | 0.00 | 44.3 | 6.8 | 1,153.5 | 20.7 | 7.7 |
| Lux Industries | 1,157.50 | 33.6 | 3,481 | 0.17 | 22.0 | -8.1 | 615.3 | 1.8 | 7.7 |
| SBC Exports | 61.77 | 86.6 | 2,941 | 0.00 | 9.4 | 269.8 | 106.0 | 72.8 | 16.8 |
| Kewal Kir.Cloth. | 475.55 | 19.8 | 2,931 | 0.84 | 41.0 | 21.5 | 279.0 | 19.4 | 17.2 |
| Median | 120.20 | 21.6 | 424 | 0.00 | 6.9 | 15.8 | 111.9 | 9.9 | 14.0 |
Competes with: Addi Industries Limited, Arvind Limited, Bang Overseas Limited, Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited, Cantabil Retail India Limited, Celebrity Fashions Limited, Dollar Industries Limited, Filatex Fashions Limited, Indian Terrain Fashions Limited, Iris Clothings Limited, Kewal Kiran Clothing Limited, Kitex Garments Limited, Libas Consumer Products Limited, Lorenzini Apparels Limited, Lovable Lingerie Limited, Lux Industries Limited, Mittal Life Style Limited, Monte Carlo Fashions Limited, Nandani Creation Limited, Page Industries Limited, Pearl Global Industries Limited, Rupa & Company Limited, S. P. Apparels Limited, SBC Exports Limited, Saraswati Saree Depot Limited, Thomas Scott (India) Limited, VIP Clothing Limited, Vaxtex Cotfab Limited, Vinny Overseas Limited, Virat Industries Limited, Visagar Polytex Limited, Vishal Fabrics Limited, Zodiac Clothing Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 515 | 500 | 552 | 812 | 932 | 929 | 988 | 1,015 | 956 | 984 | 979 | 1,069 | 1,154 |
| Expenses | 454 | 453 | 489 | 728 | 857 | 859 | 884 | 893 | 858 | 920 | 902 | 952 | 1,041 |
| Material Cost | 497 | 500 | 464 | 514 | 499 | 601 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 7.84 | -58 | 49 | -68 | 21 | -53 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 2.01 | 0.78 | 0.97 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 315 | 322 | 326 | 350 | 332 | 376 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 72 | 95 | 80 | 104 | 100 | 116 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 60 | 47 | 62 | 84 | 75 | 70 | 104 | 123 | 97 | 65 | 77 | 117 | 112 |
| OPM % | 12 | 9.40 | 11 | 10 | 8.04 | 7.49 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 6.56 | 7.86 | 11 | 9.75 |
| Other Income | 8 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 20 | 18 | 27 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 6 | 6 | 5 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 31 |
| Depreciation | 19 | 21 | 22 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 42 | 39 | 43 | 46 | 39 | 46 |
| Profit before tax | 43 | 29 | 44 | 43 | 36 | 36 | 67 | 79 | 57 | 19 | 26 | 70 | 63 |
| Tax % | 25 | 19 | 30 | -3 | 25 | 21 | 25 | 33 | 27 | 57 | 44 | 49 | 29 |
| Net Profit | 33 | 24 | 30 | 44 | 27 | 28 | 50 | 53 | 41 | 8 | 15 | 36 | 44 |
| EPS in Rs | 5.37 | 3.91 | 5.02 | 6.99 | 3.82 | 3.94 | 7.04 | 7.40 | 5.67 | 1.10 | 1.99 | 4.91 | 6.05 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 7.09 | 5.56 | 1.06 | 1.89 | 4.64 | 5.75 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,090 | 1,143 | 930 | 1,031 | 1,175 | 1,371 | 1,211 | 1,790 | 2,222 | 2,379 | 3,864 | 3,988 | 4,185 |
| Expenses | 1,065 | 1,106 | 962 | 1,055 | 1,113 | 1,285 | 1,109 | 1,585 | 1,951 | 2,125 | 3,493 | 3,631 | 3,815 |
| Material Cost | 1,957 | 1,977 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -29 | -56 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 2.15 | 3.23 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 1,227 | 1,329 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 336 | 378 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 25 | 37 | -32 | -23 | 62 | 86 | 101 | 206 | 271 | 254 | 371 | 357 | 371 |
| OPM % | 2.30 | 3.30 | -3.40 | -2.30 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
| Other Income | 91 | 78 | 42 | 47 | 15 | 36 | 12 | 11 | 31 | 30 | 53 | 77 | 84 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 47 | 40 | 36 | 37 | 33 | 37 | 34 | 40 | 26 | 36 | 77 | 95 | 103 |
| Depreciation | 33 | 22 | 18 | 16 | 19 | 55 | 53 | 59 | 72 | 89 | 128 | 167 | 173 |
| Profit before tax | 36 | 53 | -45 | -30 | 25 | 30 | 27 | 117 | 204 | 159 | 218 | 172 | 178 |
| Tax % | 2 | -15 | 5 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 0 | -0 | 15 | 18 | 27 | 42 | |
| Net Profit | 35 | 61 | -47 | -31 | 26 | 30 | 26 | 117 | 173 | 131 | 159 | 100 | 103 |
| EPS in Rs | 10 | 18 | -14 | -8.87 | 5.97 | 7.10 | 6.18 | 20 | 29 | 21 | 22 | 14 | 14 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 21 | 13 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 13%
- 5 years
- 27%
- 3 years
- 22%
- TTM
- 8%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 15%
- 5 years
- 21%
- 3 years
- -25%
- TTM
- -40%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 23%
- 5 years
- 25%
- 3 years
- -4%
- 1 year
- -8%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 8%
- 5 years
- 9%
- 3 years
- 6%
- Last year
- 3%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 29 | 30 | 32 | 36 | 37 |
| Reserves | 142 | 198 | 152 | 113 | 219 | 205 | 269 | 679 | 856 | 1,260 | 2,045 | 2,124 |
| Borrowings | 311 | 343 | 474 | 472 | 381 | 442 | 479 | 193 | 154 | 805 | 845 | 1,273 |
| Other Liabilities | 189 | 177 | 157 | 178 | 188 | 256 | 221 | 310 | 301 | 645 | 611 | 921 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 659 | 736 | 801 | 781 | 809 | 925 | 990 | 1,211 | 1,342 | 2,741 | 3,537 | 4,354 |
| Fixed Assets | 135 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 107 | 172 | 237 | 288 | 280 | 1,136 | 1,399 | 1,539 |
| CWIP | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 108 | 128 | 17 | 117 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 37 | 154 | 344 | 159 | 497 | 590 |
| Other Assets | 522 | 638 | 702 | 685 | 700 | 716 | 716 | 758 | 610 | 1,318 | 1,624 | 2,108 |
| Total Assets | 659 | 736 | 801 | 781 | 809 | 925 | 990 | 1,211 | 1,342 | 2,741 | 3,537 | 4,354 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 68 | 83 | 12 | 25 | 51 | 99 | 119 | 117 | 369 | -177 | 57 | 52 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -16 | -83 | 26 | -14 | 0 | -39 | -32 | -52 | -291 | -537 | -420 | -284 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -37 | 4 | -54 | -40 | -57 | -45 | -86 | -43 | -75 | 753 | 473 | 203 |
| Net Cash Flow | 15 | 4 | -17 | -28 | -6 | 15 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 40 | 110 | -30 |
| Free Cash Flow | 73 | 119 | -0 | 13 | 29 | 91 | 85 | 39 | 242 | -865 | -131 | -170 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 28 | 27 | 84 | 77 | 50 | 38 | 54 | 19 | 22 | 54 | 40 | 55 |
| Inventory Days | 144 | 122 | 132 | 121 | 183 | 153 | 156 | 178 | 91 | 194 | 129 | 166 |
| Days Payable | 69 | 66 | 58 | 67 | 60 | 60 | 52 | 48 | 26 | 59 | 45 | 66 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 102 | 84 | 157 | 131 | 174 | 130 | 159 | 149 | 87 | 189 | 124 | 155 |
| Working Capital Days | -25 | -53 | -60 | -59 | -15 | -40 | -25 | 55 | 27 | 14 | 38 | 30 |
| ROCE % | 8 | 9 | -1 | 1 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 18 | 21 | 11 | 11 | 8 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
848inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
9,69,161inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Gokaldas Exports Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- Addi Industries Limited
- Arvind Limited
- Bang Overseas Limited
- Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited
- Cantabil Retail India Limited
- Celebrity Fashions Limited
- Dollar Industries Limited
- Filatex Fashions Limited
- Indian Terrain Fashions Limited
- Iris Clothings Limited
- Kewal Kiran Clothing Limited
- Kitex Garments Limited
- Libas Consumer Products Limited
- Lorenzini Apparels Limited
- Lovable Lingerie Limited
- Lux Industries Limited
- Mittal Life Style Limited
- Monte Carlo Fashions Limited
- Nandani Creation Limited
- Page Industries Limited
- Pearl Global Industries Limited
- Rupa & Company Limited
- S. P. Apparels Limited
- SBC Exports Limited
- Saraswati Saree Depot Limited
- Thomas Scott (India) Limited
- VIP Clothing Limited
- Vaxtex Cotfab Limited
- Vinny Overseas Limited
- Virat Industries Limited
Uses as raw material
- cotton woven & knitted fabric
- synthetic/polyester (MMF) fabric
- trims & accessories (buttons, zippers, labels, thread)
Depends on the price of
- cotton
- cotton yarn
Sells to
- Adidas · apparel
- Carhartt · apparel
- Columbia Sportswear · apparel
- Gap Inc. · garments
- H&M Group · apparel
- Inditex / Zara · apparel
- JCPenney · apparel
- Levi Strauss & Co. · apparel
- Nike Inc. · apparel
- Puma SE · apparel
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Textiles
- Industry
- Garments & Apparels
- Classification
- Textiles › Garments & Apparels
- ISIN
- INE887G01027
Plants
- Acharpura sewing factory
- Atraco Group manufacturing facilities · Multiple, Kenya and Ethiopia
- Gokaldas Core India sewing units
- Matrix Design & Industries manufacturing facilities · Gurgaon and Ranchi, Haryana and Jharkhand
- Perundurai fabric processing unit · Perundurai, Tamil Nadu
News impact
Big market events that reach Gokaldas Exports Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 00:12 IST · Market event · medium impact
RoSCTL scheme extended by three months till December 31 for textile exporters
The government kept tax refunds for textile exporters till December 31, helping exporters like Sportking and Trident protect margins, with no direct losers.
Who it hits first
- The government extended the RoSCTL export refund scheme by three months till December 31, so textile exporters keep getting refunds of hidden taxes built into their costs.
- Gokaldas Exports and Kitex Garments, which stitch clothes for foreign brands, keep a tax refund on every export order for three more months.
- Welspun Living and Trident, which make bedsheets and towels for world retailers like IKEA, keep their export margins instead of losing the refund.
- Vardhman Textiles and K.P.R. Mill, which spin yarn and make fabric for export, also keep the refund benefit through December.
Who may gain
- Sportking India (spins yarn, 50% exports) — keeps refunds on half its sales
- Vardhman Textiles (spins yarn, 47% exports) — keeps tax refunds on export sales
- Trident (towels and bedsheets, 53% exports) — keeps refunds on majority-export sales
- Welspun Living (bedsheets, 41% exports) — keeps refunds, though the promoter sold shares recently
- K.P.R. Mill (yarn and garments) — keeps refunds on export orders
- Gokaldas Exports and Kitex Garments (garment stitchers) — keep refunds but weak finances cap the cheer
- Jindal Worldwide (90% exports) and Nitin Spinners (65.2% exports) — top exporters keep refunds
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, world retailers such as IKEA, which buys bedsheets from Welspun Living and Trident, keep getting Indian goods at steady prices, so no price or supply change for foreign shoppers.
Upstream
Upstream, yarn and fabric suppliers such as Sanathan Textiles and GHCL Textiles, which sell thread and cloth to exporters like Welspun Living, see steady orders as exporters keep shipping through December.
Where demand moves
Business
Foreign clothing brands keep placing orders with Indian stitchers and mills, and the refund keeps Indian prices competitive, so export orders hold up through December.
Capital
Investors are likely to add to shares of high-export textile mills such as Vardhman, Trident and Sportking as three more months of refunds protect profits, while domestic-focused clothing sellers see little fresh interest.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Steady exporter output keeps demand for spinning machines and looms stable through December.
Textiles
Garment, home-textile and yarn exporters keep refund margins for three more months; domestic-only sellers unaffected.
When it plays out
Immediate
Textile exporter shares edge up as the refund safety net stays till December; high-export names move first.
Medium term
Effect fades after December unless extended again; mills then face the same refund cliff in January.
Short term
Exporters ship December orders with refunds intact and book slightly better margins for the quarter.
30 Sept, 21:00 IST · Market event · high impact
India hikes anti-dumping duty on jute goods from Bangladesh, Nepal
India put higher taxes on jute bags from Bangladesh and Nepal, helping Indian jute mills sell more while bag buyers pay more; the listed generic textile names see no direct lift.
Who it hits first
- India raised the extra import tax (anti-dumping duty) on jute bags and jute goods coming from Bangladesh and Nepal.
- Orders for jute bags should shift from foreign suppliers to Indian jute mills, lifting their sales and factory use.
- The trade-remedy office (DGTR) is also considering extra countervailing duties, which could protect local mills further.
- The 29 ranked textile names are mostly cotton, synthetic and garment makers with no jute-bag business, so they get no direct lift.
- True jute makers Cheviot Company and Gloster Limited have no fundamentals row in this pack, so no signal is emitted for them.
Who may gain
- Indian jute mills such as Cheviot Company and Gloster Limited, makers of jute bags — more orders as imported bags get costlier (no signal: no Layer 7 row).
- Jute fibre farmers — steadier demand from busy domestic mills.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, bulk buyers of jute bags such as cement, grain and food packers (for example Birla Corporation, a cement maker, and Kohinoor Foods, a food maker) face higher bag prices.
Upstream
Upstream, jute growers and raw-jute suppliers should see steadier pull from Indian mills running at higher capacity.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand shifts from imported jute bags to bags made by Indian mills; garment, cotton and synthetic makers see no order change.
Capital
Investment interest may tilt toward domestic jute mills rather than the ranked generic textile stocks.
How it spreads across sectors
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Food and grain packers that buy jute bags face slightly higher packaging costs.
Forest Materials
Home to jute-bag makers Cheviot Company and Gloster Limited, which should gain sales (no signal for lack of data row).
Textiles
Jute segment gains orders; cotton, synthetic and garment makers in the ranked pool see no direct change.
Commodity angle
Commodity
jute
Move series
Note
Jute carries a demand shock from the duty, but prices are stale with no usable move, so no margin bps were available and every signal carries null commodity impact.
Shock
demand
Unit
INR/quintal
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Anti-dumping duty hike → Bangladesh/Nepal jute bags costlier in India
- Costlier imports → domestic jute-mill orders and capacity use rise
- Dearer bags → cement, grain and food packers face higher packaging cost
Pattern name
China Cascade
Patterns
- China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Chemicals
- Pharma
When it plays out
Immediate
1–7 days: jute-bag import orders pause as buyers check the new duty cost; domestic mill enquiries pick up.
Medium term
1–6 months: if countervailing duties follow, local mills hold gains; otherwise imports adjust and the lift fades.
Short term
1–4 weeks: domestic mills report higher bookings and capacity use; bag buyers pass some cost onward.
30 Sept, 19:18 IST · Market event · medium impact
Karnataka approves Rs 4,000 cr textile policy
Karnataka approved a Rs 4,000 crore plan to support textile factories, which helps clothes makers and workers, with no direct harm to others except state spending.
Who it hits first
- Karnataka cabinet cleared a Rs 4,000 crore textile policy that aims to attract Rs 20,000 crore of investment into mills, parks and garment units.
- Textile makers get cheaper expansion through subsidies on land, power and buildings, which should lift their growth hopes.
- No company gets cash today; gains come later only if firms actually build Karnataka factories and claim the sops.
Who may gain
- Karnataka-based textile firms and any listed mills that build new units in the state gain most from subsidies.
- Large listed textile makers like Page Industries, Vardhman Textiles and Welspun Living get a mild sentiment lift as sector investment hopes rise.
- Textile workers and cotton and yarn suppliers in Karnataka benefit if Rs 20,000 crore of projects create jobs and orders.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream are garment sewers, home-textile brands and retail shops that get cheaper cloth and more stitching capacity if Karnataka factories come up, plus export buyers who gain another supply base.
Upstream
Upstream are cotton farmers, yarn spinners and textile-machine makers who sell more if new Karnataka mills get built, though no machine order is named yet so this is future hope rather than booked sales.
Where demand moves
Business
Textile firms give business to builders and machine sellers: to claim Karnataka sops they must build spinning, weaving and garment units, ordering construction, textile machinery and power hookups, which later buys more cotton and yarn.
Capital
Investors may pay a little more for textile shares on stronger growth hopes, while Karnataka state commits Rs 4,000 crore of public money to pull Rs 20,000 crore of private factory spending.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mildly positive as new textile mills would order spinning and weaving machines, though no order is announced yet.
Textiles
Positive as Rs 4,000 crore of sops and a Rs 20,000 crore investment target lift growth hopes for mills and garment makers.
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days textile shares trade mildly higher on the policy headline with no earnings change.
Medium term
In 1-6 months actual investment proposals and groundbreakings show whether the Rs 20,000 crore target is real.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks firms study the fine print on subsidies and announce any Karnataka memorandums or land plans.
24 Sept, 23:47 IST · Market event · high impact
India-US trade deal ‘done and dusted’, execution awaits competitive advantage: Goyal
India and the US have finalised a trade deal, which should help Indian textiles, drug and software exporters win more US orders, while domestic-focused firms see little change.
Who it hits first
- Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal says the India-US trade deal is done and dusted, with only execution and final competitive-advantage details left.
- Lower US duties would directly cut costs for Indian exporters of clothes, bedsheets, generic drugs and software services.
- The five map seeds (Coal India, Oil India, GAIL, ABB India and Dabur) are domestic businesses with no US sales channel, so the deal barely touches them.
- Textiles exporters such as Welspun Living and Jindal Worldwide, which sell 41% and 90% of revenue abroad, stand first in line for new orders.
Who may gain
- US-facing textiles makers (bedsheets, garments, fabrics) through lower American tariffs.
- Generic-drug and drug-ingredient exporters through smoother US market access.
- Software and IT hardware firms through friendlier US tech ties and sentiment.
- Cotton, yarn and fabric suppliers at home as exporter order books refill.
- Domestic giants like Coal India, GAIL, Oil India, ABB India and Dabur see no direct gain.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US retail chains, apparel brands, hospitals and technology buyers receive cheaper Indian goods and services, while Indian exporters expand shipping, warehousing and compliance work.
Upstream
Cotton growers, spinners, weavers and dyeing units, plus drug-ingredient and packaging suppliers, get second-order demand as exporters such as Welspun Living and Jindal Worldwide run fuller order books.
Where demand moves
Business
American retailers and importers place bigger clothing and home-textile orders as duties fall; US drug distributors pull more Indian generics; US firms keep outsourcing software and hardware work — business demand moves from US buyers to Indian exporters.
Capital
Investors rotate toward export-led textiles, pharma and IT shares on better earnings hopes, funding capacity additions; domestic defensives see no such inflow.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Neutral — factory equipment demand follows domestic capex, not export duties.
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Neutral — household brands live on Indian demand, not US trade.
Healthcare
Mildly positive — smoother US access helps drug exporters; hospitals and domestic diagnostics feel nothing.
Information Technology
Mildly positive on sentiment and services continuity; hardware makers gain if tech trade eases.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Neutral — refiners and gas utilities sell at home and face no tariff channel.
Textiles
Positive first-order lift — lower US tariffs directly raise exporter volumes and margins.
When it plays out
Immediate
Export shares gap up on headlines; textiles names with confirmed US exposure lead while domestic seeds drift flat.
Medium term
Real order flows and margins decide — exporters with strong balance sheets convert the deal into earnings; pledged or leveraged names lag.
13 Aug, 04:28 IST · Market event · high impact
Ocean freight rates to the US and Europe surge three to four times, with Indian exporters now paying over $9,000 per container
Shipping a container from India to America or Europe now costs over $9,000, three to four times what it did, so Indian exporters of clothes, chemicals and machinery lose price competitiveness, while shipping companies that own the vessels earn much more.
Who it hits first
- Exporters of bulky, low-value-density goods - garments, agrochemicals, essential oils, engineering goods - lose price competitiveness because freight is charged per container regardless of contents
- Working capital cycles stretch as voyages lengthen and payment against delivery gets pushed out by weeks
- Perishable and refrigerated exports such as seafood face the sharpest hit, since longer voyages raise both cost and spoilage risk
Who may gain
- Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge directly - Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India own the vessels earning the higher rates
- Air cargo and express logistics gain share as exporters of high-value, time-sensitive goods switch from sea to air
- Freight forwarders and multimodal operators earn more on routing complexity, though their margin depends on passing carrier surcharges through without losing volume
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream buyers are US and European Union retailers, distributors and formulators. They face higher landed costs and respond by reordering from nearer suppliers or demanding a price concession from the Indian supplier. Ports and container terminals see mixed effects - longer dwell times and transshipment work rise, but underlying export volumes fall.
Upstream
Indian exporters' upstream suppliers - cotton ginners and spinners feeding garment makers, basic chemical producers feeding formulators - lose order volume with a one-to-two-month lag as export orders slow. Container availability at Indian ports is the binding constraint: empty boxes are stranded on longer rotations, so even exporters willing to pay struggle to book space.
Where demand moves
Business
Overseas demand for Indian goods does not disappear - it relocates. Under free-on-board terms the buyer pays the freight, so the buyer sees a higher landed cost for Indian cargo and reorders from suppliers closer to home: Mexico and Eastern Europe for the US and European Union markets, Vietnam and Bangladesh for garments. Indian exporters keep the order only by conceding on price, which is the real margin hit. In the opposite direction, demand flows to whoever owns vessel capacity - carriers and ship owners - and to air cargo for high-value goods that can absorb the airfreight premium.
Capital
Money rotates out of export-dependent manufacturers - textiles, agrochemicals, engineering goods, seafood - and into the asset owners who capture the surcharge: Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India. Some also rotates into domestic-demand businesses that have no export exposure at all, since this is a purely trade-side shock.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Agrochemical and pigment exporters face freight that is a large share of delivered price on high-volume cargo
Pharma
Least affected of the exporters - formulations are high value per container, so freight is a small share of the invoice
Services
Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge; freight forwarders gain routing work
Textiles
Garment exports lose landed-cost competitiveness against Vietnam and Bangladesh just as US tariff pressure had begun to ease
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
fuel
Note
Freight itself is not a tracked Commodity node. What is tracked, and what matters here, is bunker fuel: ship owners capture the freight surcharge but pay 11.41 percent more for fuel than a month ago, so the fuel edge is the cost offset against the revenue gain. Only Great Eastern Shipping carries a recorded fuel cost weight (13.39 percent); Shipping Corporation of India has the edge with no weight.
Shock type
cost_offset
Unit
USD/gallon
When it plays out
Immediate
Shipping stocks lead - the December 2023 Red Sea precedent had Great Eastern Shipping up 6.41% in a day. Exporters drift lower as buyers begin renegotiating.
Medium term
The January 2024 precedent shows the shipping trade has the longer legs - Shipping Corporation of India was up 31.01% a month later while Gokaldas Exports was down 2.67%. Rates normalise only when the chokepoint disruptions ease, which is tied to the Hormuz situation.
Short term
Watch export order books and the container availability position at Nhava Sheva and Mundra. Exporters will flag freight in their next quarterly commentary; the government may be pressed for a freight subsidy or interest-equalisation extension.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"High container freight to US/EU raises landed cost for exported components, reducing buyer margins and order competitiveness versus Mexico/Eastern Europe suppliers; working-capital cycle can stretch if shipments are delayed by rerouting.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BHARATFORG","SONACOMS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for export-oriented component makers with meaningful Europe/US exposure.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Although high-value shipments can use air freight, bulkier jewellery exports and importer replenishment still face logistics cost inflation and delivery uncertainty; weak buyer resistance can compress exporter margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is smaller than low-value bulky goods because value density is high, but export demand and delivery reliability can still be hit.","sector":"Gems and Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Longer voyages and higher refrigerated container costs raise delivered prices for shrimp and seafood exports to US/EU; cold-chain delays increase spoilage and rejection risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","WATERBASE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Shrimp exporters are sensitive to both freight rates and transit-time reliability.","sector":"Seafood and Aquaculture Exports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight spike raises landed costs for rice, spices, tea, coffee and processed foods; lower-value or bulky exports lose competitiveness fastest, especially where contracts are price-sensitive.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","TATACONSUM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on product value density and ability to pass through freight surcharges.","sector":"Agricultural and Processed Food Exports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exported machinery, forgings, castings and industrial products face higher container costs and delayed delivery windows, hurting competitiveness and execution timelines for overseas orders.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CGPOWER","SKFINDIA","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book execution may be affected more than immediate demand if delays persist.","sector":"Engineering Goods and Industrial Machinery","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight volatility increases demand for forwarding, route planning, warehousing and multimodal alternatives; however, margin benefit depends on ability to pass carrier surcharges without volume loss.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Asset-light forwarders may gain on spreads and volumes, while exporters cutting shipments can cap upside.","sector":"Freight Forwarders and Multimodal Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rerouting and schedule disruptions can increase dwell time, transshipment complexity and demand for container handling/storage; but weaker export volumes can offset handling gains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Beneficiaries mainly if congestion/storage revenues rise without a sharp fall in throughput.","sector":"Ports and Container Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters of high-value or time-sensitive goods may shift from sea to air to protect delivery commitments, supporting air cargo and express logistics demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INDIGO","BLUEDART","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Only viable for high-value, low-weight products; not a broad substitute for container freight.","sector":"Air Cargo and Express Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US/EU-bound leather goods and footwear are price-sensitive exports; freight inflation raises landed costs and can shift incremental orders toward closer or cheaper competing suppliers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BATAINDIA","RELAXO","MIRZAINT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Listed pure-play export exposure is limited, but the sector-level causal link is defensible.","sector":"Footwear and Leather Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 13 Sep 2023 | unspecified | ₹1 |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Feb 2007 | split | ₹0 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Jun 2026 | SBI LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD | BUY | 4,00,000 | ₹814.79 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call13 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY2712 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY262 Feb 2026
- Annual report · 2024-2525 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.