Pearl Global Industries Limited
NSE: PGILGarments & Apparels
Share price
₹1,281.10
+0.69% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
67
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹11,832 Cr
P/E ratio
37.7
P/B ratio
8.1
ROCE
19.9%
ROE
21.0%
Dividend yield
0.6%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Our sales figures for this company step down at Jun 2014 and we hold nothing that says why, so we cannot honestly quote a growth rate across it.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
Our sales figures for this company step down at Jun 2014 and we hold nothing that says why, so there is no honest growth rate of its own to set against its sector.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 37.4× earnings it costs 1.6× the market, which pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 46.9×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 20.5×, the 99th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 1.5 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 25%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearl Global Industries Limited — this one | 25%/yr | 37.4× | ₹1.5 |
| Page Industries Limited | 11%/yr | 53.0× | ₹4.8 |
| Arvind Limited | 6%/yr | 30.5× | ₹5.1 |
| Gokaldas Exports Limited | -25%/yr | 46.9× | — |
| Lux Industries Limited | -9%/yr | 31.3× | — |
| SBC Exports Limited | 54%/yr | 79.8× | ₹1.5 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Garments & Apparels), it ranks 3 of 34 on returns, 23 of 32 on growth, 13 of 34 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 19.9% on capital, ahead of 91% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹1199 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹503 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹144 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 137 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 25 days for its cash to waiting 6 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
7 of 9 checks clear · 78%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue rose 24.5% and profit rose 50.4% as Q1 profit margin came in above the full-year target.
Announced 5 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹1,528 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+24.5%
Revenue vs last quarter
+16.3%
Net profit
₹99 Cr
Profit vs last year
+50.4%
Profit vs last quarter
+22.5%
Net margin
6.5%
EPS
₹21.77
Earnings call transcript · 6 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹11,832 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹1,281.10
- 52w High
- ₹1,358
- 52w Low
- ₹606
- Enterprise value
- ₹12,028 Cr
- Beta
- 1.3
- Price CAGR 1y
- 109.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 71.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 76.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 40.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 8.3%
- PEG ratio
- 1.5
- P/E ratio
- 37.7
- P/B ratio
- 8.1
- EV / EBITDA
- 23.4
- Industry P/E
- 21.2
- ROCE
- 19.9%
- ROCE 5y average
- 18.8%
- ROE
- 21.0%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.6
- Interest coverage
- 3.5
- Dividend yield
- 0.6%
- ROE 3y average
- 22.0%
- ROE last year
- 21.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹5,025 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹270 Cr
- Operating margin
- 10.0%
- Net profit margin
- 5.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 9.6%
- Sales growth 3y
- 16.7%
- Sales growth 5y
- 27.5%
- Profit growth 3y
- 25.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 101.0%
- EPS
- ₹30.1
- Sales growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 24.0%
- Dividend payout
- 24.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹1,528 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹99 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 24.5%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 50.0%
- OPM latest quarter
- 10.7%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹158
- Face Value
- ₹5.0
- Total debt
- ₹943 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹747 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹943 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 62.5
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹398 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹203 Cr
- FCF yield
- 0.7%
- Net cash flow
- ₹194 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 59.9%
- FII holding
- 6.8%
- DII holding
- 20.1%
- Public holding
- 13.2%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page Industries | 36,450.00 | 52.1 | 40,709 | 1.51 | 192.8 | -4.0 | 1,420.5 | 7.9 | 64.4 |
| Arvind Ltd | 510.50 | 31.6 | 13,876 | 0.88 | 57.8 | 25.9 | 2,501.0 | 24.6 | 14.7 |
| Pearl Global Ind | 1,272.30 | 37.5 | 11,748 | 0.57 | 99.2 | 50.9 | 1,528.3 | 24.5 | 19.9 |
| Gokaldas Exports | 652.35 | 46.4 | 4,779 | 0.00 | 44.3 | 6.8 | 1,153.5 | 20.7 | 7.7 |
| Lux Industries | 1,108.50 | 32.1 | 3,321 | 0.18 | 22.0 | -8.1 | 615.3 | 1.8 | 7.7 |
| SBC Exports | 63.21 | 88.6 | 3,007 | 0.00 | 9.4 | 269.8 | 106.0 | 72.8 | 16.8 |
| Kewal Kir.Cloth. | 472.50 | 19.7 | 2,915 | 0.85 | 41.0 | 21.5 | 279.0 | 19.4 | 17.2 |
| Median | 124.07 | 22.0 | 427 | 0.00 | 7.1 | 16.1 | 114.0 | 10.0 | 14.0 |
Competes with: Addi Industries Limited, Arvind Limited, Bang Overseas Limited, Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited, Cantabil Retail India Limited, Celebrity Fashions Limited, Dollar Industries Limited, Filatex Fashions Limited, Gokaldas Exports Limited, Indian Terrain Fashions Limited, Iris Clothings Limited, Kewal Kiran Clothing Limited, Kitex Garments Limited, Libas Consumer Products Limited, Lorenzini Apparels Limited, Lovable Lingerie Limited, Lux Industries Limited, Mittal Life Style Limited, Monte Carlo Fashions Limited, Nandani Creation Limited, Page Industries Limited, Rupa & Company Limited, S. P. Apparels Limited, SBC Exports Limited, Saraswati Saree Depot Limited, Thomas Scott (India) Limited, VIP Clothing Limited, Vaxtex Cotfab Limited, Vinny Overseas Limited, Virat Industries Limited, Visagar Polytex Limited, Vishal Fabrics Limited, Zodiac Clothing Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 894 | 961 | 704 | 877 | 1,053 | 1,202 | 1,023 | 1,229 | 1,228 | 1,313 | 1,170 | 1,314 | 1,528 |
| Expenses | 811 | 883 | 639 | 796 | 954 | 1,105 | 931 | 1,112 | 1,116 | 1,192 | 1,074 | 1,179 | 1,364 |
| Material Cost | 476 | 534 | 537 | 519 | 554 | 687 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -2.16 | -7.29 | 20 | -66 | 21 | -139 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 175 | 136 | 167 | 121 | 97 | 192 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 221 | 219 | 232 | 251 | 254 | 271 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 242 | 233 | 235 | 249 | 253 | 352 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 83 | 77 | 65 | 81 | 98 | 97 | 91 | 117 | 112 | 121 | 96 | 134 | 164 |
| OPM % | 9.33 | 8.06 | 9.29 | 9.29 | 9.34 | 8.05 | 8.93 | 9.54 | 9.16 | 9.22 | 8.20 | 10 | 11 |
| Other Income | 7 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 3.16 | -0.32 | 0.02 | -0.40 | -0.53 | -2.73 | |||||||
| Interest | 20 | 24 | 17 | 22 | 23 | 25 | 24 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 22 | 26 | 27 |
| Depreciation | 14 | 16 | 16 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 20 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 26 |
| Profit before tax | 58 | 46 | 35 | 54 | 73 | 63 | 54 | 78 | 76 | 79 | 59 | 95 | 120 |
| Tax % | 18 | 14 | 2 | 10 | 15 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 17 |
| Net Profit | 47 | 39 | 34 | 49 | 62 | 56 | 48 | 65 | 66 | 72 | 52 | 81 | 99 |
| EPS in Rs | 5.55 | 4.58 | 4.10 | 5.89 | 7.49 | 6.38 | 6.13 | 7.43 | 7.38 | 7.97 | 5.78 | 9.02 | 11 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 15 | 15 | 16 | 12 | 18 | 22 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,024 | 1,393 | 1,538 | 1,496 | 1,758 | 1,685 | 1,491 | 2,714 | 3,158 | 3,436 | 4,506 | 5,025 | 5,325 |
| Expenses | 974 | 1,333 | 1,465 | 1,450 | 1,657 | 1,603 | 1,424 | 2,555 | 2,883 | 3,111 | 4,089 | 4,541 | 4,810 |
| Material Cost | 1,856 | 2,144 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -65 | -32 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 581 | 522 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 839 | 956 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 891 | 970 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 50 | 61 | 73 | 46 | 100 | 82 | 67 | 159 | 275 | 325 | 417 | 484 | 515 |
| OPM % | 4.80 | 4.30 | 4.70 | 3.10 | 6 | 4.90 | 4.50 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Other Income | 24 | 24 | 30 | 47 | 51 | 44 | 36 | 37 | 34 | 31 | 38 | 36 | 33 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 4.56 | -1.23 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 23 | 21 | 35 | 38 | 43 | 53 | 47 | 61 | 82 | 100 | 112 | 123 | 102 |
| Depreciation | 16 | 17 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 42 | 44 | 48 | 51 | 64 | 75 | 87 | 93 |
| Profit before tax | 34 | 47 | 49 | 32 | 83 | 31 | 11 | 86 | 176 | 192 | 267 | 309 | 353 |
| Tax % | 29 | 23 | 15 | 29 | 19 | 30 | -54 | 18 | 13 | 12 | 14 | 13 | |
| Net Profit | 24 | 37 | 42 | 23 | 67 | 22 | 17 | 70 | 153 | 169 | 231 | 270 | 304 |
| EPS in Rs | 2.89 | 4.23 | 4.69 | 2.78 | 7.77 | 2.49 | 1.99 | 7.87 | 17 | 20 | 27 | 30 | 34 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 53 | 60 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 19 | 18 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 11 | 44 | 21 | 24 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 14%
- 5 years
- 28%
- 3 years
- 17%
- TTM
- 14%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 23%
- 5 years
- 101%
- 3 years
- 25%
- TTM
- 24%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 40%
- 5 years
- 76%
- 3 years
- 71%
- 1 year
- 109%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 16%
- 5 years
- 21%
- 3 years
- 22%
- Last year
- 21%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 23 | 23 |
| Reserves | 296 | 323 | 359 | 373 | 448 | 479 | 496 | 577 | 701 | 780 | 1,133 | 1,437 |
| Borrowings | 167 | 217 | 253 | 315 | 333 | 463 | 440 | 645 | 558 | 588 | 773 | 943 |
| Other Liabilities | 250 | 264 | 282 | 226 | 298 | 288 | 339 | 538 | 501 | 595 | 667 | 842 |
| Minority Interest | -9.21 | -22 | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 734 | 825 | 916 | 937 | 1,100 | 1,252 | 1,296 | 1,781 | 1,781 | 1,986 | 2,595 | 3,245 |
| Fixed Assets | 213 | 210 | 256 | 274 | 338 | 422 | 390 | 448 | 500 | 612 | 727 | 818 |
| CWIP | 3 | 11 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 36 | 47 | 15 | 33 | 35 | 44 | 113 |
| Investments | 11 | 19 | 13 | 37 | 33 | 38 | 55 | 55 | 60 | 30 | 24 | 36 |
| Other Assets | 507 | 585 | 630 | 617 | 722 | 756 | 804 | 1,263 | 1,188 | 1,309 | 1,800 | 2,278 |
| Total Assets | 734 | 825 | 916 | 937 | 1,100 | 1,252 | 1,296 | 1,781 | 1,781 | 1,986 | 2,596 | 3,245 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 32 | 25 | 15 | 33 | 75 | 64 | 95 | -92 | 365 | 352 | 176 | 398 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -55 | -22 | -49 | -58 | -59 | -85 | -26 | -40 | -26 | -128 | -104 | -158 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 2 | 24 | 11 | 31 | -14 | 15 | -62 | 153 | -200 | -152 | 101 | -46 |
| Net Cash Flow | -20 | 27 | -23 | 6 | 2 | -6 | 7 | 22 | 139 | 72 | 174 | 194 |
| Free Cash Flow | 2 | 5 | -49 | 8 | 4 | -32 | 64 | -142 | 325 | 229 | 81 | 203 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 43 | 50 | 38 | 35 | 46 | 48 | 59 | 49 | 24 | 28 | 26 | 30 |
| Inventory Days | 119 | 80 | 93 | 93 | 99 | 119 | 133 | 131 | 115 | 108 | 108 | 122 |
| Days Payable | 113 | 82 | 51 | 48 | 76 | 82 | 117 | 106 | 88 | 105 | 86 | 97 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 49 | 48 | 80 | 79 | 69 | 85 | 76 | 74 | 52 | 32 | 49 | 55 |
| Working Capital Days | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 16 | 17 | 29 | 25 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| ROCE % | 6 | 12 | 13 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 20 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
exports as % of revenue
26.00
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
196inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
10,54,298inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Pearl Global Industries Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- Addi Industries Limited
- Arvind Limited
- Bang Overseas Limited
- Bella Casa Fashion & Retail Limited
- Cantabil Retail India Limited
- Celebrity Fashions Limited
- Dollar Industries Limited
- Filatex Fashions Limited
- Gokaldas Exports Limited
- Indian Terrain Fashions Limited
- Iris Clothings Limited
- Kewal Kiran Clothing Limited
- Kitex Garments Limited
- Libas Consumer Products Limited
- Lorenzini Apparels Limited
- Lovable Lingerie Limited
- Lux Industries Limited
- Mittal Life Style Limited
- Monte Carlo Fashions Limited
- Nandani Creation Limited
- Page Industries Limited
- Rupa & Company Limited
- S. P. Apparels Limited
- SBC Exports Limited
- Saraswati Saree Depot Limited
- Thomas Scott (India) Limited
- VIP Clothing Limited
- Vaxtex Cotfab Limited
- Vinny Overseas Limited
- Virat Industries Limited
Uses as raw material
- knitted fabric
- labels, trims and accessories
- woven fabric
- woven polyester fabric
Depends on the price of
- cotton
- cotton yarn
- fuel
Sells to
- Aritzia · apparel/garments
- Big W · apparel/garments
- Calvin Klein · apparel/garments
- Chico's · apparel/garments
- GAP / Old Navy · apparel/garments
- Inditex (Zara, Bershka) · apparel/garments
- Knitwell Group · apparel/garments
- Kohl's · apparel/garments
- Macy's · apparel/garments
- Muji · apparel/garments
- PVH (Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger) · apparel/garments
- Polo Ralph Lauren · apparel/garments
- Primark · apparel/garments
- Talbots · apparel/garments
- Target Australia · apparel/garments
- Tommy Hilfiger · apparel/garments
- Walmart Canada and Mexico · apparel/garments
- Zara · apparel/garments
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Textiles
- Industry
- Garments & Apparels
- Classification
- Textiles › Garments & Apparels
- ISIN
- INE940H01022
Business segments
- Hong Kong · 48%
- Bangladesh · 21%
- India · 13%
- Vietnam · 12%
- Others · 6%
Plants
- Bangladesh manufacturing units
- Guatemala manufacturing unit
- India manufacturing units
- Indonesia manufacturing units
- Vietnam manufacturing units
News impact
Big market events that reach Pearl Global Industries Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 00:12 IST · Market event · medium impact
RoSCTL scheme extended by three months till December 31 for textile exporters
The government kept tax refunds for textile exporters till December 31, helping exporters like Sportking and Trident protect margins, with no direct losers.
Who it hits first
- The government extended the RoSCTL export refund scheme by three months till December 31, so textile exporters keep getting refunds of hidden taxes built into their costs.
- Gokaldas Exports and Kitex Garments, which stitch clothes for foreign brands, keep a tax refund on every export order for three more months.
- Welspun Living and Trident, which make bedsheets and towels for world retailers like IKEA, keep their export margins instead of losing the refund.
- Vardhman Textiles and K.P.R. Mill, which spin yarn and make fabric for export, also keep the refund benefit through December.
Who may gain
- Sportking India (spins yarn, 50% exports) — keeps refunds on half its sales
- Vardhman Textiles (spins yarn, 47% exports) — keeps tax refunds on export sales
- Trident (towels and bedsheets, 53% exports) — keeps refunds on majority-export sales
- Welspun Living (bedsheets, 41% exports) — keeps refunds, though the promoter sold shares recently
- K.P.R. Mill (yarn and garments) — keeps refunds on export orders
- Gokaldas Exports and Kitex Garments (garment stitchers) — keep refunds but weak finances cap the cheer
- Jindal Worldwide (90% exports) and Nitin Spinners (65.2% exports) — top exporters keep refunds
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, world retailers such as IKEA, which buys bedsheets from Welspun Living and Trident, keep getting Indian goods at steady prices, so no price or supply change for foreign shoppers.
Upstream
Upstream, yarn and fabric suppliers such as Sanathan Textiles and GHCL Textiles, which sell thread and cloth to exporters like Welspun Living, see steady orders as exporters keep shipping through December.
Where demand moves
Business
Foreign clothing brands keep placing orders with Indian stitchers and mills, and the refund keeps Indian prices competitive, so export orders hold up through December.
Capital
Investors are likely to add to shares of high-export textile mills such as Vardhman, Trident and Sportking as three more months of refunds protect profits, while domestic-focused clothing sellers see little fresh interest.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Steady exporter output keeps demand for spinning machines and looms stable through December.
Textiles
Garment, home-textile and yarn exporters keep refund margins for three more months; domestic-only sellers unaffected.
When it plays out
Immediate
Textile exporter shares edge up as the refund safety net stays till December; high-export names move first.
Medium term
Effect fades after December unless extended again; mills then face the same refund cliff in January.
Short term
Exporters ship December orders with refunds intact and book slightly better margins for the quarter.
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · medium impact
Ultra-large container ships return to the Suez Canal - the 17,200-TEU Bangkok Maersk transits on an Italy-Singapore run - shortening Asia-Europe routes for Indian exporters even as Hormuz stays disrupted
The biggest container ships are sailing through the Suez Canal again instead of going the long way round Africa, which cuts about two weeks and some freight cost off shipping Indian clothes, linen and chemicals to Europe - helpful for exporters, unhelpful for shipowners who were paid for the longer trip.
Who it hits first
- Indian exporters shipping to Europe - garments, home textiles, chemicals and engineering goods - pay less per container and get paid sooner, because the goods reach the buyer around two weeks earlier.
- Container shipping lines lose the other side of that trade: a shorter voyage means the same cargo absorbs fewer ship-days, so effective capacity rises and freight rates fall.
Who may gain
- Export-heavy apparel and home-textile makers whose European customers price on landed cost - Pearl Global, KPR Mill, Trident, Welspun Living.
- Container terminals, inland container depots and rail container operators, which handle more boxes per month when sailings speed up.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
European retailers and brands are the end buyers and capture part of the freight saving through renegotiated landed-cost contracts, so Indian exporters will not keep all of it. Container liners and charter owners sit on the losing side, as shorter voyages release effective capacity and soften rates.
Upstream
Yarn and fabric mills, dyeing units and chemical intermediate makers that feed the exporters see steadier order flow, because a shorter shipping cycle lets brands place repeat orders inside the same season rather than committing once a year.
Where demand moves
Business
The same volume of Indian goods now travels a shorter route. Exporters gain because freight is a real line item in a garment's landed cost and a two-week faster delivery lets European buyers reorder within a season. Shipping lines lose, because the industry sells ship-days: when every voyage gets shorter, the same fleet can carry more cargo, so freight rates fall. Container handlers in between gain on throughput.
Capital
Money rotates towards export-facing manufacturers with European exposure and away from container shipowners whose freight rates were being propped up by the longer Cape route. Indian shipowners are a partial exception because Great Eastern Shipping is mostly tankers, whose rates are still being set by the separate Hormuz disruption.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Bulk and specialty chemical exporters to Europe get lower delivered cost and faster working-capital turns.
Pharma
Formulation exporters to the EU see shorter cold-chain and shipping cycles, a modest working-capital benefit on an already air-freight-heavy trade.
Services
Container shipping tonne-mile demand falls as the Cape detour ends, which pressures freight and charter rates; container terminals and rail container operators gain throughput.
Textiles
Freight cost per container to Europe falls and lead times shorten, improving Indian competitiveness against Bangladesh and Vietnam on EU orders.
When it plays out
Immediate
One ship transit is a signal, not a trend. Expect no measurable earnings impact this quarter and only a sentiment nudge for export names.
Medium term
If Suez routing normalises through FY27, Indian exporters to Europe carry a structurally lower landed cost, while container freight rates give back the war-premium they have held since 2024.
Short term
Watch whether major carriers publish Suez-routed Asia-Europe schedules for the next sailing season. That, not a single transit, is what actually resets freight rates.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization reduces Asia-Europe container transit time and freight volatility, improving delivery reliability and landed margins for Indian auto-component exporters supplying European OEMs and aftermarket channels.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BOSCHLTD","UNOMINDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit strongest for exporters with meaningful Europe exposure and containerized shipments.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Shorter India-Europe routing lowers logistics cost for project equipment, industrial components and machinery exports, improving quote competitiveness and execution timelines for export orders.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ABB","SIEMENS","BHEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Draft mentions engineering exporters but not the sector; impact depends on export mix and contract pass-through terms.","sector":"Capital Goods \u0026 Engineering","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower Europe-bound freight friction and faster logistics support export turnaround for finished jewellery and precious-stone shipments, while reduced uncertainty helps inventory planning for seasonal European demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Air freight is important for high-value goods, so ocean-route normalization is a secondary benefit.","sector":"Gems \u0026 Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced transit time to Europe improves cold-chain reliability and lowers spoilage or working-capital risk for containerized food exports, especially frozen seafood and processed agri products.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","VENKEYS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant where Europe is a meaningful export market and reefer-container availability improves.","sector":"Seafood \u0026 Processed Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Return of large vessels through Suez can normalize Asia-Europe schedules, lifting predictability and container handling volumes at Indian ports linked to Europe trade lanes, though fewer Cape-related tonne-miles may reduce some transshipment distortions.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive for throughput and schedule reliability; mixed if freight-rate normalization reduces ancillary congestion-related gains.","sector":"Ports \u0026 Port Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved vessel schedules increase container evacuation predictability from ports to ICDs and manufacturing clusters, supporting rail/container movement and reducing dwell-time disruptions.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","TCI","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Complements CFS/ICD beneficiaries but extends to inland rail and trucking logistics.","sector":"Surface Logistics \u0026 Rail Freight","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cheaper and faster Asia-Europe/Asia-Med container flows can ease imported component availability and shipping costs for electronics and appliance supply chains, while European export channels for finished goods improve modestly.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect because many inputs are Asia-sourced, but global container normalization can still reduce freight premia.","sector":"Consumer Durables \u0026 Electronics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Suez normalization helps container trade but Hormuz disruption keeps crude and LNG risk premia elevated; refiners and OMCs face margin and working-capital pressure if energy freight or crude prices remain volatile.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"This is a parallel negative ripple from the unresolved Hormuz disruption rather than a Suez beneficiary.","sector":"Oil \u0026 Gas Marketing / Refining","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Hormuz and West Asia disruption can affect feedstock, ammonia, sulphur and energy-linked input costs, while Suez normalization only partly offsets logistics pressure on non-energy cargoes.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","COROMANDEL","GNFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive freight normalization may be outweighed by gas/feedstock volatility for some producers.","sector":"Fertilisers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
26 Jul, 04:23 IST · Market event · high impact
US imposes 10% Section 301 forced-labour tariff on Indian gems & jewellery and broad exports; India secures lower 10% tier vs 12.5% rivals
The US put a new 10% import tax on Indian jewellery and other goods sold to America, so India's export jewellers and clothing makers (like Vaibhav Global and Pearl Global) earn less there, while jewellers who sell mainly inside India (like Titan) are barely touched.
Who it hits first
- Indian gems & jewellery exporters that sell into the US now pay a 10% Section 301 duty on goods (cut & polished diamonds, gemstones, jewellery) that used to enter the US duty-free.
- The biggest listed US-facing names are Vaibhav Global (US retail via Shop LC) and Goldiam (US lab-grown-diamond jewellery); garment and home-textile exporters (Pearl Global, Indo Count) face the same 10% duty.
Who may gain
- Domestic-focused jewellers such as Titan (Tanishq) and Kalyan Jewellers are largely insulated because they sell mostly to Indian buyers, not the US, and can attract money rotating out of hit exporters.
- India is relatively better off than rivals: it got the lower 10% tier while China, Vietnam, UAE, Turkey and others face 12.5% — a small competitive cushion, though Belgium/Antwerp keeps duty-free access.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US retailers and jewellery brands (Shop LC, Signet and others) face higher landed costs on India-origin goods and may pass some of it to US shoppers or trim India sourcing.
Upstream
Lower US order volumes flow back to India's gem-cutting and garment clusters (Surat diamonds, Tiruppur/Mumbai apparel), softening work for small job-workers and packaging/logistics vendors that serve exporters.
Where demand moves
Business
US buyers of Indian jewellery and apparel now pay 10% more at the border, so some orders shift to duty-free Belgium (diamonds) or get renegotiated on price; domestic Indian jewellery demand is unaffected.
Capital
Investors sell export-heavy jewellery/textile names and rotate into insulated domestic-facing jewellers (Titan, Kalyan) and defensives, exactly as happened in the July-2025 tariff shock.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Specialty/dye chemical exporters to the US fall under the same broad forced-labour duty, a smaller second-order drag.
Consumer Durables
US-exporting jewellers face a duty/volume hit; domestic-facing jewellers are insulated and may see relative-safety buying.
Textiles
Apparel and home-textile US-exporters lose price competitiveness under the same 10% duty.
codex additions
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- US 10% forced-labour duty on India-origin goods
- Gems & jewellery + textile US-exporters lose price edge
- Order re-routing to duty-free Belgium (diamonds)
- Domestic-facing jewellers insulated / relative beneficiaries
Pattern name
China Cascade (trade/tariff variant)
Sectors queried
- Consumer Durables
- Textiles
- Chemicals
When it plays out
Immediate
Export-exposed jewellery and textile stocks (Vaibhav Global, Pearl Global, Indo Count) drift lower on the duty headline; domestic jewellers hold up or firm.
Medium term
Exporters diversify away from the US or absorb the duty into margins; India's 2.5pp tier advantage vs Asian rivals may cushion market-share loss over 1-6 months.
Short term
Companies quantify US revenue at risk and pass-through ability on Q1 calls; order re-routing via Belgium and price renegotiation become clearer over 1-4 weeks.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower US-bound export volumes in gems, jewellery, textiles and other tariff-hit goods reduce container throughput, air-cargo demand and freight forwarding activity; near-term rerouting via Belgium/Antwerp may also shift logistics lanes away from India-origin direct exports.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is stronger for export-linked container and air-cargo handlers than bulk port operators.","sector":"Logistics \u0026 Ports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"High-value gems and jewellery often move by air; tariff-led order deferrals, smaller shipment sizes, or rerouting through duty-free hubs can reduce premium air-freight and secure-logistics demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DELHIVERY","BLUEDART","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely a niche but visible second-order effect because jewellery has high value density.","sector":"Air Cargo \u0026 Express Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters facing margin compression and slower US orders may see working-capital stress, delayed receivables, higher packing-credit utilization and some asset-quality risk in MSME-heavy export clusters.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["SBIN","BANKBARODA","FEDERALBNK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large diversified banks dilute the effect; regional/export-cluster exposure matters more than headline loan books.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Trade Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Pressure on jewellery exporters and small manufacturers can tighten cash flows in gems/jewellery clusters, increasing short-term borrowing and collateralized gold-loan demand; stress risk may also rise for unsecured MSME lenders.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["MUTHOOTFIN","MANAPPURAM","AAVAS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Gold-loan lenders may benefit from demand, while MSME-focused credit can face weaker borrower cash flows.","sector":"NBFCs \u0026 Gold Loans","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Forced-labour tariff enforcement raises demand for supply-chain traceability, vendor audits, documentation automation and ERP/compliance upgrades among exporters trying to preserve US access.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large IT names only see a diffuse benefit, but the causal link is defensible through compliance digitization.","sector":"IT Services \u0026 Compliance Tech","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters need stronger origin, labour-compliance and chain-of-custody documentation to contest or avoid forced-labour penalties, lifting demand for audits, certification and inspection services.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SYNGENE","LTTS","BUREAUCRAT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play listed TIC exposure is limited in India; use only where compliance/testing revenue is material or adjacent.","sector":"Testing, Inspection \u0026 Certification","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters unable to pass through tariffs may divert jewellery, apparel and home-textile inventory into the domestic market, increasing discounting and pressuring realizations for discretionary retailers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TRENT","ABFRL","SHOPERSTOP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Consumers may benefit from discounts, but listed retailers face margin pressure if promotional intensity rises.","sector":"Retail \u0026 Domestic Consumption","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Sustained pressure on Surat, Mumbai, Jaipur, Tiruppur and textile/jewellery export clusters can reduce hiring, wage growth and small-business confidence, softening local commercial and residential demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["LODHA","OBEROIRLTY","PHOENIXLTD"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Mostly localized; more relevant for developers or malls with exposure to export-linked urban consumption pools.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Export Clusters","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower outbound shipments of jewellery, garments, home textiles and broad goods exports reduce demand for export cartons, labels, specialty packaging and protective materials.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["UFLEX","TCPLPACK","JKPAPER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Broad domestic demand offsets the hit, but export-packaging volumes can soften in affected categories.","sector":"Packaging \u0026 Paper","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Weaker export receipts from tariff-hit categories can add pressure to the trade balance and INR; rupee depreciation would raise costs for import-heavy sectors while supporting non-US or services exporters.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["INDIGO","BPCL","HINDUNILVR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a macro transmission channel, likely modest unless the tariff shock broadens materially.","sector":"Currency-Sensitive Importers / FX Beneficiaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
28 Jun, 14:51 IST · Market event · low impact
Commerce ministry convenes stakeholders meet on June 30 on SEZ issues
Who it hits first
- Export-oriented companies operating in SEZs / EOUs (IT delivery campuses, pharma formulation units, textile-apparel exporters) could see a marginal benefit IF the June 30 consultation later yields easier SEZ rules or harmonized export-promotion schemes. As of now it is a pre-decisional meeting - no policy, no company named.
Who may gain
- IT SEZ majors: TCS, INFY, HCLTECH, WIPRO (large SEZ-based delivery footprints)
- Pharma exporters: DRREDDY, CIPLA, SUNPHARMA (export-oriented formulation units)
- Textile/apparel exporters: PGIL (70% export rev), TRIDENT (53%), VTL (44%)
Along the supply chain
Downstream
No direct downstream shortage - the consultation does not alter current production or deliveries. Downstream export customers are unaffected at this stage; any benefit is a future, policy-contingent margin/incentive effect, not a volume disruption.
Upstream
No direct supply-chain disruption - this is a policy consultation, not a physical or output shock. Indirectly, export logistics providers (ports, container freight, warehousing) would see higher upstream volumes only if SEZ/export-scheme reforms later materialize and lift trade throughput.
Where demand moves
Business
No immediate business-demand shift - the meeting decides nothing yet. If export-promotion schemes are later harmonized, export-oriented SEZ/EOU units (IT delivery, pharma formulations, textile apparel) would gain marginal incentive/cost relief that lifts order economics; this is contingent and not yet actionable.
Capital
Mild speculative positive bias toward export-oriented IT/Pharma/Textile names as some traders position ahead of June 30; the catalyst is too soft to drive genuine sector rotation, so realized capital impact pre-decision is negligible.
How it spreads across sectors
IT Services
SEZ tax/compliance harmonization is structurally relevant to large SEZ delivery campuses (mild positive, contingent)
Pharma
Export-promotion-scheme harmonization aids export-oriented formulation/SEZ units (mild positive, contingent)
Textiles
Export promotion scheme harmonization aids EOU/SEZ apparel & yarn exporters (mild positive, contingent)
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
June 30 stakeholder meeting; likely no binding decision - headlines only. Minimal, if any, price reaction in export-oriented names.
Medium term
If SEZ reforms + export-scheme harmonization are actually notified (1-6 months), export-oriented IT/Pharma/Textile units could see modest incentive/cost-structure improvement; until then this stays a watch-item.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"SEZ reforms/export scheme harmonization could raise export-import throughput for SEZ units -\u003e higher container volumes, warehousing, customs handling and multimodal logistics demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact depends on actual policy easing; ports/logistics benefit indirectly from higher trade volumes rather than the consultation itself. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Ports \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Clearer SEZ rules and scheme harmonization could improve occupancy economics for SEZ campuses -\u003e higher demand for compliant office/industrial space and lease renewals in export zones.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","PHOENIXLTD","BRIGADE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for developers/REIT-like landlords with IT park or industrial park exposure; listed pure-play SEZ exposure is limited. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Industrial Parks \u0026 Commercial Real Estate","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If reforms revive SEZ investment or expansion plans -\u003e new industrial sheds, utilities, roads, effluent systems and logistics infrastructure -\u003e higher EPC order opportunities.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","KALPATARU","KEC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Consultation stage makes timing uncertain; orders would lag policy clarity. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Engineering, Procurement \u0026 Construction","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"SEZ/export-promotion harmonization may improve competitiveness of export-oriented chemical units -\u003e better capacity utilization and potential capex in chemical clusters.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["AARTIIND","DEEPAKNTR","NAVINFLUOR"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Chemical exporters are sensitive to compliance, duty remission and input-credit mechanics. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Specialty Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"SEZ rule easing plus export scheme alignment could support electronics export manufacturing -\u003e improved unit economics for assembly, components and contract manufacturing.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","KAYNES","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Link is strongest if reforms address customs, DTA sales, duty remission or operational flexibility for export units. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Export promotion harmonization could reduce friction for component exporters operating from industrial/export zones -\u003e improved competitiveness in global supply chains.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BOSCHLTD","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Effect likely modest because global auto demand and OEM cycles dominate near-term earnings. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"SEZ reforms can matter for high-value export processing zones -\u003e smoother import of inputs, export documentation and duty treatment -\u003e potential benefit to jewellery export units.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Listed tickers are not pure SEZ exporters; benefits are indirect and policy-detail dependent. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Gems, Jewellery \u0026 Precious Metal Exporters","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Export-oriented SEZ activity may increase working-capital, trade finance, forex hedging and capex borrowing needs -\u003e incremental fee and credit opportunities for lenders.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ICICIBANK","HDFCBANK","SBIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"System-level impact is likely diluted for large banks unless reforms materially lift export activity. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Trade Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher SEZ occupancy/capacity utilization would raise industrial power demand -\u003e benefits power suppliers, grid operators and captive/renewable energy providers serving industrial clusters.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","TATAPOWER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive demand effect may be offset by tariff regulation, fuel costs and state-level power policy. | Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5 breadth.","sector":"Power Utilities \u0026 Industrial Energy","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 11 Sep 2026 | bonus | ₹0 |
|---|---|---|
| 21 May 2026 | interim | ₹8.5 |
| 17 Nov 2025 | interim | ₹6 |
| 26 May 2025 | interim | ₹6.5 |
| 27 Nov 2024 | interim | ₹5 |
| 5 Jan 2024 | split | ₹0 |
| 22 Nov 2023 | interim | ₹12.5 |
| 1 Sep 2023 | interim | ₹5 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- subject0.5× · 11 Sep 2026
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call · Q1FY276 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2625 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2615 May 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY267 Feb 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.