Manappuram Finance Limited
NSE: MANAPPURAMNon Banking Financial Company (NBFC)
Share price
₹304.15
-1.54% close of 8 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 5 Oct 2026, the close above is 8 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
55
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹28,590 Cr
P/E ratio
19.7
P/B ratio
1.8
ROCE
8.3%
ROE
7.0%
Dividend yield
0.7%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 4.7% over the past year, and 30.3% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps on lending slipped from 34.8% to 21.3% over the last two years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 30.3% a year against a sector median of 16.0% — 14.3 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 19.7× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 22.8×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 8.8×, the 73rd percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manappuram Finance Limited — this one | -13%/yr | 19.7× | — |
| Bajaj Finance | 19%/yr | 29.0× | ₹1.5 |
| Shriram Finance Limited | 19%/yr | 19.1× | ₹1.0 |
| Tata Capital Limited | 17%/yr | 24.4× | ₹1.4 |
| Cholamandalam Investment & Finance | 25%/yr | 22.8× | ₹0.91 |
| Muthoot Finance | 43%/yr | 9.0× | ₹0.21 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC)), it ranks 42 of 73 on returns, 21 of 68 on growth. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 7.0% on capital, ahead of 42% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
This question does not fit a lender: the money it lends out is its day-to-day outflow and the deposits or premiums it takes are the inflow, so a cash bridge cannot say whether its growth pays for itself. Look at the return on owners' money instead.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
Not enough filed accounts to run these checks yet.
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Profit more than quadrupled from a year ago, when the microfinance arm was loss-making
Announced 11 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹3,034 Cr
Net profit
₹585 Cr
Profit vs last year
+343.0%
Profit vs last quarter
+44.4%
Net margin
19.3%
EPS
₹6.23
Earnings call transcript · 11 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹28,590 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹304.15
- 52w High
- ₹382
- 52w Low
- ₹245
- Enterprise value
- —
- Beta
- 1.1
- Price CAGR 1y
- 8.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 29.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 11.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 13.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 1.3%
- PEG ratio
- -1.5
- P/E ratio
- 19.7
- P/B ratio
- 1.8
- EV / EBITDA
- —
- Industry P/E
- 16.8
- ROCE
- 8.3%
- ROCE 5y average
- —
- ROE
- 7.0%
- Debt / Equity
- 3.6
- Interest coverage
- —
- Dividend yield
- 0.7%
- ROE 3y average
- 12.0%
- ROE last year
- 7.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹9,509 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹993 Cr
- Operating margin
- 16.0%
- Net profit margin
- 10.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 16.4%
- Sales growth 3y
- 12.4%
- Sales growth 5y
- 8.5%
- Profit growth 3y
- -13.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- -10.0%
- EPS
- ₹10.7
- Sales growth TTM
- 5.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 81.0%
- Dividend payout
- 19.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹3,034 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹585 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 34.1%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 343.2%
- OPM latest quarter
- 28.0%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹171
- Face Value
- ₹2.0
- Total debt
- ₹57,837 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹6,149 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹57,837 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 84.4
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- -₹20,238 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹20,427 Cr
- FCF yield
- —
- Net cash flow
- ₹1,965 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 41.7%
- FII holding
- 22.3%
- DII holding
- 14.8%
- Public holding
- 21.2%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bajaj Finance | 948.30 | 28.8 | 5,90,407 | 0.57 | 6,080.6 | 27.4 | 23,165.5 | 18.6 | 10.9 |
| Shriram Finance | 945.00 | 19.6 | 2,22,363 | 1.14 | 3,452.8 | 59.9 | 13,400.4 | 16.2 | 11.5 |
| Tata Capital | 319.30 | 24.9 | 1,35,539 | 0.18 | 1,628.2 | 56.3 | 8,821.9 | 15.1 | 8.6 |
| Cholaman.Inv.&Fn | 1,580.00 | 23.5 | 1,34,990 | 0.13 | 1,656.2 | 45.6 | 8,856.3 | 21.9 | 9.7 |
| Muthoot Finance | 2,697.10 | 9.5 | 1,08,280 | 1.11 | 2,824.8 | 38.8 | 8,671.6 | 34.4 | 15.8 |
| L&T Finance Ltd | 264.35 | 20.7 | 66,255 | 1.04 | 916.0 | 28.7 | 5,212.9 | 22.4 | 8.4 |
| SBI Cards | 563.20 | 23.6 | 53,597 | 0.44 | 664.4 | 19.5 | 5,040.6 | 3.4 | 10.1 |
| Manappuram Fin. | 308.90 | 20.0 | 29,016 | 0.65 | 584.8 | 322.4 | 3,034.2 | 34.1 | 8.3 |
| Median | 134.80 | 19.6 | 468 | 0.00 | 11.1 | 38.3 | 49.1 | 28.3 | 9.5 |
Competes with: Bajaj Finance, Cholamandalam Investment & Finance, HDB Financial Services Limited, L&T Finance Limited, Muthoot Finance, SBI Cards & Payment Services, Shriram Finance Limited, Tata Capital Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 2,030 | 2,161 | 2,305 | 2,348 | 2,488 | 2,633 | 2,560 | 2,361 | 2,262 | 2,273 | 2,354 | 2,614 | 3,034 |
| Expenses | 671 | 675 | 729 | 773 | 846 | 892 | 1,191 | 1,637 | 1,233 | 1,018 | 1,034 | 877 | 906 |
| Financing Profit | 710 | 796 | 827 | 796 | 793 | 835 | 444 | -172 | 174 | 380 | 375 | 627 | 854 |
| Financing Margin % | 35 | 37 | 36 | 34 | 32 | 32 | 17 | -7 | 8 | 17 | 16 | 24 | 28 |
| Other Income | 27 | 13 | 21 | 14 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 6 |
| Interest | 648 | 689 | 749 | 779 | 848 | 906 | 925 | 895 | 855 | 876 | 945 | 1,109 | 1,274 |
| Depreciation | 56 | 62 | 62 | 65 | 64 | 67 | 70 | 66 | 75 | 79 | 77 | 75 | 78 |
| Profit before tax | 681 | 747 | 786 | 746 | 753 | 773 | 376 | -236 | 102 | 302 | 303 | 564 | 782 |
| Tax % | 27 | 25 | 27 | 24 | 26 | 26 | 26 | -14 | -30 | 28 | 21 | 28 | 25 |
| Net Profit | 498 | 561 | 575 | 564 | 557 | 572 | 278 | -203 | 132 | 217 | 239 | 405 | 585 |
| EPS in Rs | 5.86 | 6.60 | 6.77 | 6.63 | 6.55 | 6.74 | 3.33 | -2.26 | 1.63 | 2.60 | 2.85 | 4.30 | 6.22 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1,988 | 2,369 | 3,406 | 3,421 | 4,180 | 5,465 | 6,331 | 6,061 | 6,700 | 8,848 | 10,012 | 9,509 | 10,275 |
| Expenses | 648 | 820 | 1,011 | 1,344 | 1,365 | 1,547 | 1,669 | 2,133 | 2,317 | 2,848 | 4,557 | 4,162 | 3,835 |
| Financing Profit | 462 | 601 | 1,225 | 1,047 | 1,469 | 2,086 | 2,443 | 1,916 | 2,195 | 3,134 | 1,913 | 1,561 | 2,236 |
| Financing Margin % | 23 | 25 | 36 | 31 | 35 | 38 | 39 | 32 | 33 | 35 | 19 | 16 | 22 |
| Other Income | 5 | 3 | 3 | 58 | 63 | 86 | 44 | 65 | 50 | 72 | 20 | 15 | 25 |
| Interest | 877 | 947 | 1,169 | 1,030 | 1,345 | 1,832 | 2,219 | 2,011 | 2,188 | 2,866 | 3,541 | 3,786 | 4,204 |
| Depreciation | 54 | 56 | 63 | 68 | 75 | 164 | 171 | 198 | 204 | 246 | 267 | 307 | 310 |
| Profit before tax | 414 | 548 | 1,166 | 1,037 | 1,457 | 2,007 | 2,316 | 1,784 | 2,041 | 2,960 | 1,666 | 1,270 | 1,950 |
| Tax % | 34 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 35 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 22 | |
| Net Profit | 271 | 355 | 758 | 676 | 949 | 1,480 | 1,725 | 1,329 | 1,500 | 2,197 | 1,204 | 993 | 1,445 |
| EPS in Rs | 3.23 | 4.20 | 8.98 | 8.04 | 11 | 17 | 20 | 16 | 18 | 26 | 14 | 11 | 16 |
| Dividend Payout % | 42 | 54 | 17 | 25 | 19 | 16 | 10 | 19 | 17 | 13 | 28 | 19 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 15%
- 5 years
- 8%
- 3 years
- 12%
- TTM
- 5%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 11%
- 5 years
- -10%
- 3 years
- -13%
- TTM
- 81%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 13%
- 5 years
- 11%
- 3 years
- 29%
- 1 year
- 8%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 17%
- 5 years
- 13%
- 3 years
- 12%
- Last year
- 7%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 168 | 168 | 168 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 169 | 188 |
| Reserves | 2,465 | 2,590 | 3,193 | 3,645 | 4,378 | 5,577 | 7,138 | 8,199 | 9,476 | 11,379 | 12,263 | 15,863 |
| Borrowing | 8,632 | 9,638 | 10,986 | 12,607 | 15,297 | 23,022 | 23,327 | 24,816 | 29,167 | 34,320 | 36,077 | 57,837 |
| Other Liabilities | 352 | 443 | 804 | 609 | 602 | 767 | 703 | 623 | 693 | 880 | 695 | 672 |
| Total Liabilities | 11,616 | 12,839 | 15,152 | 17,030 | 20,446 | 29,535 | 31,338 | 33,808 | 39,504 | 46,748 | 49,205 | 74,559 |
| Fixed Assets | 206 | 230 | 222 | 310 | 367 | 803 | 926 | 1,052 | 1,094 | 1,070 | 1,134 | 1,057 |
| CWIP | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 17 | 33 | 11 | 27 |
| Investments | 217 | 49 | 5 | 5 | 174 | 90 | 338 | 421 | 534 | 726 | 790 | 2,051 |
| Other Assets | 11,193 | 12,560 | 14,925 | 16,715 | 19,904 | 28,639 | 30,066 | 32,322 | 37,860 | 44,918 | 47,269 | 71,424 |
| Total Assets | 11,616 | 12,839 | 15,152 | 17,030 | 20,446 | 29,535 | 31,338 | 33,808 | 39,504 | 46,748 | 49,205 | 74,559 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -888 | -1,042 | -1,271 | -33 | -1,661 | -3,620 | -619 | -423 | -3,103 | -3,450 | -467 | -20,238 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 649 | 72 | -25 | -148 | -371 | 26 | -186 | -193 | -616 | -601 | -125 | -1,632 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 265 | 772 | 1,211 | 293 | 2,388 | 6,049 | 59 | 438 | 3,849 | 4,092 | 1,132 | 23,834 |
| Net Cash Flow | 26 | -198 | -84 | 112 | 356 | 2,455 | -747 | -177 | 130 | 41 | 541 | 1,965 |
| Free Cash Flow | -912 | -1,121 | -1,324 | -193 | -1,787 | -3,716 | -672 | -585 | -3,275 | -3,585 | -662 | -20,427 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE % | 11 | 13 | 25 | 19 | 22 | 28 | 26 | 17 | 17 | 21 | 10 | 7 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
capital adequacy (CRAR) %
21.30pct
2026-06-30
cost-to-income %
42.98
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
gross NPA %
1.56pct
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
total loans / revolving facilities outstanding at period end, the base of loan_default_cr
8,391cr
2025-12-31
net NPA %
1.10
net interest margin %
18.50
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
31,86,591inr
2026-03-31
return on assets %
3.50
News
News and filings about Manappuram Finance Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Depends on the price of
- Gold
- Interest Rates
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC)
- Classification
- Financial Services › Non Banking Financial Company (NBFC)
- ISIN
- INE522D01027
Business segments
- Gold loan and others · 87%
- Micro Finance · 13%
News impact
Big market events that reach Manappuram Finance Limited, and how the effect spreads.
3 Sept, 04:32 IST · Market event · high impact
Gold slides for a seventh straight session to a three-week low - MCX gold breaks below Rs 1.50 lakh per 10 grams on a firm US dollar and Fed rate-hike bets
Gold has fallen for seven days in a row to a three-week low because the US dollar is strong and traders expect the US Fed to raise rates. Cheaper gold cuts jewellers' raw-material bills but also devalues their stock and makes shoppers wait, while gold-loan lenders can lend less against the same jewellery.
Who it hits first
- Jewellery makers and retailers - Sky Gold, Senco Gold, Kalyan Jewellers and Titan - see their main raw material get cheaper, but the gold already sitting in their stores and factories is simultaneously worth less than they paid for it.
- Shoppers postpone jewellery purchases when the price is falling because they expect a better price next week, so volumes soften in the run-up to the festive season.
- Gold-loan lenders Muthoot Finance and Manappuram Finance can lend less against the same pledged jewellery, so new loan growth slows and some existing loans move toward their allowed loan-to-value ceiling.
Who may gain
- Buyers of finished jewellery, who pay less per gram - this is the only unambiguous winner.
- Jewellers with fast inventory turnover and a large share of revenue from making charges rather than metal value, of which Titan is the clearest example and the only jeweller that was positive at one month in the closest past episode.
- Importers and the rupee generally, since gold is one of India's largest import items after crude, so a cheaper gold bill narrows the trade deficit.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream is the Indian household buying jewellery for weddings and festivals. Falling prices delay that purchase - buyers wait for the price to stabilise. Retailers respond with gold-rate protection schemes and advance-booking offers, which pull demand forward but at lower realised margin. The festive quarter is the single largest selling window of the year, so the timing of this slide is unhelpful.
Upstream
The upstream input is gold bullion, imported and bought from bullion dealers such as MMTC. A falling price means jewellers buy their next consignment cheaper, which is worth roughly 593 basis points of input cost for Sky Gold and Senco Gold, where gold is about 90% of the cost of goods. But because jewellers must hold weeks of gold inventory to display and manufacture, that same fall writes down what they already own.
Where demand moves
Business
Cheaper gold flows down the chain as lower input cost for jewellery makers, but the benefit is largely cancelled by two forces. Their existing inventory revalues lower, which is a real loss, and customers defer purchases in a falling market, which is a volume loss. On the lending side the flow runs the other way: less valuable collateral means gold-loan companies simply cannot write as large a loan against the same necklace, so credit demand they would otherwise have served goes unserved or moves to unsecured lenders and banks.
Capital
Money is rotating out of the gold complex as a whole rather than between winners and losers within it. Over the last three sessions Sky Gold fell about 6.7%, Kalyan Jewellers and Thangamayl fell, and PC Jeweller fell 7.4% - the tape shows investors selling the theme, not repositioning inside it. The gold-loan lenders are the cleanest short: they were down at one week in three of three past gold slumps. Capital exiting this cluster is going to defensives and to large private banks rather than back into any part of the jewellery chain.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Durables
Jewellery retailers see input relief offset by inventory revaluation losses and deferred customer purchases
Financial Services
Gold-loan lenders face shrinking collateral value, lower loan-to-value headroom and slower loan book growth
Services
Bullion dealers and gold importers see lower value per unit of the same physical volume
Commodity angle
Commodity
Gold
Note
The Commodity node's one-month change is positive (+6.42%) because gold rallied earlier; the affectedness ranker's five-day window resolved -6.587%, which is the move this event describes (a seventh straight down session to a three-week low). Margin impact is computed off the -6.587% five-day move.
Shock type
price
Unit
USD/oz
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Firm US dollar plus Fed rate-hike bets
- Gold sells off for seven straight sessions
- Jewellery input cost falls but inventory revalues lower and buyers defer
- Gold-loan collateral value falls, lending headroom shrinks
Pattern name
US Fed Cascade
Sectors queried
- Consumer Durables
- Financial Services
When it plays out
Immediate
Jewellery and gold-loan stocks move together with the metal over the next few sessions. Historically the reaction has been sharpest when a gold fall coincides with a broad risk-off move, which is the case here given the US-Iran escalation.
Medium term
Over one to six months, a sustained lower gold price is structurally positive for jewellery volumes - affordability improves - but negative for gold-loan book growth, which is a function of collateral value. The two halves of this cluster diverge over that horizon.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch whether gold stabilises before the festive season begins. If it does, deferred purchases return as a volume bulge; if it keeps sliding, the deferral extends and the festive quarter is at risk. The gold-loan lenders' one-week weakness is the most reliable pattern in the record.
30 Aug, 04:23 IST · Market event · high impact
Gold drops 3% as new Fed chair Kevin Warsh's inflation warning lifts September US rate-hike bets
Gold fell 3% in a day after the new US central bank chief warned inflation is still too high, hinting at a rate rise - that makes gold jewellery slightly cheaper to buy, but it mainly hurts lenders like Muthoot and Manappuram who lend money against gold that is now worth less.
Who it hits first
- Muthoot Finance and Manappuram Finance lend against pledged gold jewellery, so a lower gold price shrinks how much they can lend per gram and thins the cushion on loans already outstanding
- Sky Gold and Senco Gold, with gold at 90% of input cost, see a gross input relief of about 270 basis points - most of which passes to customers because jewellery is quoted off the live gold rate
Who may gain
- Jewellery buyers rather than jewellery companies: cheaper gold improves festive-season affordability and supports volumes even where it does not lift margin
- Titan carries the least gold-price sensitivity of the listed jewellers because a larger share of its value sits in watches, eyewear and brand
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Jewellery retailers pass the lower gold rate straight into shelf prices, so the customer captures the saving. Below them, gold-loan lenders are the true downstream casualty: their entire product is priced off the value of the gold their borrowers hand over, so a lower gold price directly compresses loan size, loan growth and the safety margin on the existing book.
Upstream
Bullion importers, refiners and the banks that finance gold consignments hold inventory bought at higher prices and mark it down when gold falls. Because most Indian jewellers buy on gold-metal-loan terms that price at delivery, the inventory risk sits largely with these intermediaries rather than with the retailers - which is exactly why the retailers do not keep the 270 basis points either.
Where demand moves
Business
Cheaper gold raises physical demand at the retail counter - Indian buyers are famously price-sensitive and step in on dips ahead of the festive season - so jewellers sell more grams even as the rupee value per gram falls. That demand flows back up to bullion importers and refiners. In the opposite direction, gold-loan lenders see loan demand fall in rupee terms because the same pledged chain now supports a smaller loan, and existing borrowers may face top-up calls.
Capital
A hawkish Fed lifts real US yields, which pulls money out of gold and out of the high-valuation equities that behave like long-duration assets. Within India that means selling in expensive consumer names such as Titan at a PE of 78.60, and rotation toward cheaper, rate-insensitive value. Gold-loan lenders lose the collateral-appreciation tailwind that drove their earnings upgrades, so the money that chased that theme rotates to lenders whose growth does not depend on a rising commodity.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Durables
Jewellery input cost falls but is largely passed through; the affordability boost supports festive volumes
Financial Services
Gold-loan lenders face slower loan growth and thinner collateral cover - the clearest and most consistent effect
Metals & Mining
Precious-metal traders and refiners mark down inventory
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Gold
Move window note
Commodity node move is stale for this event - the five-day reading of -0.11% sits inside the ranker's plus-or-minus 2% deadband and commodity_move_resolved came back false. Basis-point impacts below are computed on the article-reported one-day fall of 3%, and the propagated tail signs carry raw edge roles that may be inverted.
Note
TITAN, KALYANKJIL, MUTHOOTFIN and MANAPPURAM also carry DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edges to Gold but the edges record no cost_weight_pct, so no basis-point impact is computable and none is asserted. The 270 bps figures are GROSS input relief; Layer 8 established that jewellers pass most of it to customers, which is why both signals are mixed rather than positive.
Shock type
price
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Warsh signals a possible September hike
- US real yields and the dollar rise
- Gold falls 3% in a day
- Gold-loan collateral values and loan growth compress
- High-valuation Indian consumer names de-rate
- Jewellery becomes more affordable, supporting festive volumes
Pattern name
US Fed Cascade
Sectors queried
- Consumer Durables
- Financial Services
- Metals & Mining
When it plays out
Immediate
Gold-loan lenders should open weakest; jewellers are genuinely two-sided. The measured record shows jewellers ranged from +4.19% to -6.56% on day one across three past gold drops, with the sign set by whether the drop came alone or with a broad risk-off.
Medium term
Context matters more than the drop. Gold is still up 13.65% over a month, so this is a give-back inside an uptrend, not a regime change. A genuine gold downtrend would be needed before jewellers see durable margin relief or lenders see real credit stress.
Short term
The one-week window is where the pattern is reliable: Muthoot Finance and Manappuram were both down at one week in all three precedents. Watch the September Fed meeting - if a hike is delivered, the pressure extends; if Warsh softens, gold retraces and this reverses.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher US rate-hike odds -\u003e stronger dollar and tighter global liquidity -\u003e FII outflow pressure and higher funding-cost sensitivity for Indian lenders; banks with gold-loan books may also tighten LTVs if gold stays weak.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HDFCBANK","ICICIBANK","SBIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is broader macro-liquidity led, not only gold-collateral led. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Banking","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gold correction -\u003e lower collateral cushion for secured gold lending -\u003e more conservative disbursements and margin calls; stronger dollar/rate expectations can also pressure wholesale borrowing costs for NBFCs.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BAJFINANCE","CHOLAFIN","IIFL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Separate from pure gold-loan names because diversified NBFC funding spreads and risk appetite can still be affected. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Non-Banking Financial Companies","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gold price drop inside a strong uptrend -\u003e tactical profit-taking in gold ETFs and commodity-linked allocations -\u003e possible rotation into equity, debt, or hybrid products depending on risk sentiment.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HDFCAMC","NAM-INDIA","360ONE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for gold ETF flows, potentially positive for non-gold financial-product flows. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Asset Management \u0026 Wealth Management","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Sharp gold move plus Fed-rate repricing -\u003e higher volatility across commodities, currency, and equities -\u003e increased trading volumes but weaker risk appetite if FII outflows dominate.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ANGELONE","IEX","BSE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Brokerages may benefit from volatility-led activity even if market direction is adverse. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Capital Markets \u0026 Brokerages","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stronger dollar after higher US rate-hike expectations -\u003e INR depreciation pressure -\u003e translation benefit for export-heavy IT firms, partly offset by US macro slowdown concerns.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","HCLTECH"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Currency benefit is faster; demand-risk impact would be slower and depends on US growth expectations. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Information Technology Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stronger dollar and tighter global rates -\u003e INR pressure -\u003e higher rupee cost of dollar-linked aviation fuel, aircraft leases, maintenance, and debt service.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["INDIGO","SPICEJET","GMRINFRA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Gold is not the driver here; the Fed-dollar channel is. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Airlines \u0026 Aviation","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"US rate-hike bets -\u003e stronger dollar -\u003e higher landed rupee cost of crude and petroleum products even if dollar crude is stable; this can pressure OMC margins if retail pricing lags.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on crude direction and government pricing policy. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Oil \u0026 Gas Marketing","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stronger dollar -\u003e higher rupee cost for imported crude-linked inputs, solvents, additives, and specialty chemicals; tighter liquidity can also weigh on discretionary housing repaint demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","BERGEPAINT","PIDILITIND"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order currency and input-cost effect rather than direct gold exposure. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Paints \u0026 Specialty Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher global rate expectations -\u003e pressure on domestic yields and funding costs -\u003e softer affordability and risk appetite; lower gold prices may marginally reduce wealth-effect support in gold-heavy households.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Effect is plausible but indirect; domestic RBI stance and housing demand matter more. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Real Estate","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gold import affordability changes and stronger-dollar trade repricing -\u003e shifts in jewellery export/import working capital, air-cargo movement, and customs-linked logistics activity around festive inventory cycles.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BLUEDART","TCI","CONCOR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant if jewellers alter import timing or export orders after the gold correction. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Logistics \u0026 Trade Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
6 Aug, 04:31 IST · Market event · medium impact
Gold posts its biggest one-day jump since February to $4,235/oz as central-bank buying, a technical breakout and softer US data lift the metal
Gold jumped about 3% in a day to $4,235 an ounce, so jewellery gets dearer just before the festive buying season - that squeezes jewellers who must fund costlier stock, while gold-loan lenders gain because the jewellery pledged with them is now worth more.
Who it hits first
- Gold jumped 3.49% in a day to $4,235 an ounce, its biggest single-day move since February
- Jewellers must fund the same inventory at a higher price, so working capital tightens just before the festive season
- Retail buyers typically defer purchases or buy lighter pieces when gold spikes, so jewellery volumes soften even if rupee sales hold
- Gold-loan lenders see the jewellery pledged with them revalue upward, which supports bigger loan tickets and lowers loss risk
Who may gain
- Gold-loan lenders (Muthoot Finance, Manappuram Finance) - collateral is worth more, so ticket sizes rise and loss-given-default falls
- Jewellery makers carrying unhedged gold inventory (Radhika Jeweltech) - existing stock revalues upward
- Holders of physical gold and gold-backed savings products
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream is the retail jewellery buyer, who responds to a price spike by postponing, buying lighter, or switching to studded pieces where the metal is a smaller share of the ticket. That response passes back to the business-to-business manufacturers who make the pieces for retail chains. Gold-loan borrowers sit on a separate downstream branch and are helped rather than hurt, because their pledged jewellery now covers a larger loan.
Upstream
The upstream is imported gold bullion, since India mines almost none of its own. A higher dollar gold price raises the import bill directly and widens the trade deficit, and it raises the financing cost of the gold-metal-loan arrangements that jewellers use to fund inventory. Refiners and bullion dealers see the value but not the volume of their throughput rise.
Where demand moves
Business
Dearer gold destroys jewellery demand at the retail counter - the same rupee budget buys a lighter chain, so grammage falls even when the bill value does not. That lost volume flows back up to the business-to-business manufacturers who supply the retail chains, which is why Sky Gold is ranked as affected as the retailers. In the opposite direction, dearer gold creates lending demand: the same pledged necklace now supports a larger loan, so gold-loan books grow. Demand also shifts within jewellery from plain gold towards studded pieces, where the making charge and the diamond rather than the metal drive the price.
Capital
Money rotates out of plain-gold jewellery retailers and into gold-loan financiers, and within jewellery towards studded-mix players such as Titan that are less exposed to the metal price. Central-bank buying - the World Gold Council reported the highest of 2026 in June, and the Bank of Korea bought for the first time in 13 years - is itself the capital flow driving the underlying move, and it is price-insensitive official-sector demand rather than investment demand.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Durables
Jewellery volumes soften and working capital tightens ahead of the festive season; studded-mix players are cushioned
Financial Services
Gold-loan collateral revalues upward, supporting ticket sizes and lowering loss-given-default for gold financiers
Commodity angle
Commodity
Gold
Edges without cost weight
- TITAN (consumer role)
- KALYANKJIL (consumer role)
- MUTHOOTFIN (beneficiary role)
- MANAPPURAM (beneficiary role)
Note
Gold rose 3.49% in a day. Basis points below are GROSS input inflation for jewellers, not net margin pressure, because the metal price is largely passed through to the buyer; the real negative is volume and working capital.
Shock type
price
When it plays out
Immediate
Jewellery shares fell and gold-loan lenders firmed; Kalyan Jewellers was already down 11% in four days after a weak first quarter
Medium term
If central-bank buying continues at June's pace the higher price level persists, which structurally shifts jewellery demand towards studded and lightweight ranges and grows the gold-loan book
Short term
Watch festive-season footfall and grammage data. A spike this close to the buying season is the worst timing for plain-gold retailers, and it is exactly when gold-loan disbursements accelerate
25 Jun, 16:25 IST · Market event · high impact
UPDATE: Gold at 7-month low + silver crashes ~14%/week on Fed rate-hike bets; gold-loan financiers Muthoot/Manappuram fall 3.5%, Hindustan Zinc -9%
Who it hits first
- Gold-loan NBFCs MUTHOOTFIN, MANAPPURAM: falling gold collateral erodes LTV headroom, slows AUM growth, raises auction/LGD risk
- Gold-loan-heavy bank CSBBANK (~40% gold book): same LTV/growth pressure
- HINDZINC silver by-product margin hit from silver crash
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Gold-loan NBFC borrowers face margin/top-up calls; jewellers mark down inventory while benefiting from cheaper future input
Upstream
Lower silver by-product realisations for silver/zinc miner Hindustan Zinc
Where demand moves
Business
Gold-loan demand softens as collateral value falls and borrowers face top-up calls; pledged-gold liquidity to rural households shrinks
Capital
Risk-off rotation out of gold/precious-metal proxies; selective safety bid into large-cap banks/IT away from gold-loan NBFCs
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Durables
jewellery inventory markdown vs cheaper input
Financial Services
gold-loan AUM/LTV pressure
Metals & Mining
silver-segment margin hit
codex additions
- Solar & renewable-energy equipment
- Electronics manufacturing services
- Capital markets infrastructure & commodity exchanges
- Asset management companies
- Banks with gold-loan or NBFC exposure
- Rural consumption & FMCG
- Real estate & high-ticket discretionary consumption
- Airlines and import-sensitive sectors
- Paints, industrial coatings & specialty chemicals
Commodity angle
Commodity
Gold
Note
Gold acts as loan collateral (not a cost input) for gold financiers, so margin_impact_bps is not computable as a cost-weight; impact is via LTV/AUM. Silver has no priced Commodity node -> HINDZINC handled as narrative-inferred.
Shock type
price_and_demand
When it plays out
Immediate
Gold-loan NBFCs and gold-loan banks de-rate 2-5%; HINDZINC silver-led weakness
Medium term
If gold stabilises, gold-loan franchises recover (as in Oct-2025 precedent); sustained fall extends pressure (Jan-2026 precedent)
Short term
AUM growth guidance and LTV/top-up commentary watched; silver realisation impact on HINDZINC Q earnings
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Silver selloff lowers silver-paste and module input-cost expectations for solar cell/module makers, improving margin headroom if contract prices lag commodity costs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["PREMIERENE","WEBELSOLAR","BORORENEW"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on inventory cycle and pass-through in module pricing.","sector":"Solar \u0026 renewable-energy equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Silver is used in contacts, soldering, connectors and circuit components; lower precious-metal input costs can modestly ease BOM costs for EMS players.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","KAYNES","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Silver is usually a small share of total cost, so margin effect is limited but directionally favorable.","sector":"Electronics manufacturing services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Sharp precious-metal volatility can lift hedging/speculative turnover in bullion futures and options, while ETF price declines may hurt AUM-linked economics.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["MCX","BSE","CDSL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"MCX may benefit from volumes; depositories/market platforms may see mixed effects from ETF redemptions versus trading activity.","sector":"Capital markets infrastructure \u0026 commodity exchanges","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gold and silver ETF NAV declines reduce AUM and fee base; risk-off flows may also trigger redemptions from commodity ETFs, partly offset by bargain-buying inflows.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HDFCAMC","NAM-INDIA","UTIAMC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on share of passive commodity ETF AUM in each AMC.","sector":"Asset management companies","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower collateral values can increase top-up collateral calls and refinancing stress for borrowers, while banks exposed to gold loans or gold-loan NBFC funding may face tighter risk controls.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["FEDERALBNK","CSBBANK","CANBK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is less concentrated than in gold-loan NBFCs but still plausible through secured retail lending and wholesale exposure.","sector":"Banks with gold-loan or NBFC exposure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Falling gold prices reduce household wealth perception and borrowing capacity against pledged gold, potentially weighing on rural liquidity and discretionary FMCG demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HINDUNILVR","DABUR","MARICO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Offset possible if lower jewellery prices free cash for other consumption, so effect is not one-way everywhere.","sector":"Rural consumption \u0026 FMCG","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gold is a household savings asset; a sharp price decline can create negative wealth effect for affluent and semi-urban households, delaying property or premium purchase decisions.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","SOBHA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely second-order and sentiment-driven, strongest where gold holdings are an important store of savings.","sector":"Real estate \u0026 high-ticket discretionary consumption","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower gold prices can reduce India’s gold import bill, easing CAD/INR pressure at the margin; a steadier rupee helps dollar-cost importers such as airlines.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INDIGO","SPICEJET","CONCOR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is macro-mediated and can be overwhelmed by crude oil, USD rates and demand trends.","sector":"Airlines and import-sensitive sectors","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Silver and precious-metal compounds are used in select industrial coatings, catalysts and specialty applications; lower metal prices can ease niche input costs and working-capital needs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","PIDILITIND","AARTIIND"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Only a marginal cost driver for most listed names, but defensible as a third-order input-cost ripple.","sector":"Paints, industrial coatings \u0026 specialty chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
11 Jun, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
RBI cancels registration certificates of 135 NBFCs — sector cleanup positive for top-tier
Who it hits first
- RBI cancels 135 NBFC registrations — sector cleanup; small/non-compliant players exit; top tier consolidates share
Who may gain
- BAJFINANCE
- CHOLAFIN
- MUTHOOTFIN
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Borrowers reassigned to compliant lenders; small business may face tighter access
Upstream
Bank funding to top NBFCs remains stable; weaker NBFCs face liquidity squeeze
Where demand moves
Business
Consumer/SME lending demand redirects to top-tier NBFCs; pricing power improves on weaker competition
Capital
Quality NBFC names see PE re-rating; weak NBFCs see further derating
How it spreads across sectors
Banking
neutral - selective lending opportunity
NBFC
positive consolidation
When it plays out
Immediate
Top NBFCs gain 1-2%
Medium term
Acquisition opportunities for top NBFCs
Short term
Sector hierarchy tightens
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 17 Aug 2026 | interim | ₹1 |
|---|---|---|
| 11 May 2026 | interim | ₹0.5 |
| 6 Feb 2026 | interim | ₹0.5 |
| 7 Nov 2025 | interim | ₹0.5 |
| 14 Aug 2025 | interim | ₹0.5 |
| 15 May 2025 | interim | ₹0.5 |
| 21 Feb 2025 | interim | ₹1 |
| 18 Nov 2024 | interim | ₹1 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Insider trades
| Disclosed | Who | Type | Shares | Value ₹ Cr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2026 | V.P. Nandakumar · Promoter and Director | UNKNOWN | 17,18,750 | 55.00 |
| 2 Sep 2026 | Satheeshkumar M · Designated Person | BUY | 2,780 | 0.10 |
| 2 Sep 2026 | Satheeshkumar M · Designated Person | BUY | 1,415 | 0.05 |
| 19 Aug 2026 | Lekshmy E · Employees Immediate Relative | SELL | 19,000 | 0.66 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call13 Aug 2026
- Earnings call11 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2620 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY264 May 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.