Network People Services Technologies Limited
NSE: NPSTFinancial Technology (Fintech)
Share price
₹1,752.20
-2.12% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
64
out of 100 · worked out 9 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹3,680 Cr
P/E ratio
81.8
P/B ratio
8.3
ROCE
19.7%
ROE
15.0%
Dividend yield
0.1%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 47.2% over the past year, and 69.5% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 19.8% to 25.4% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 69.5% a year against a sector median of 16.0% — 53.5 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 81.8× earnings it costs 3.4× the market, which pays 24.1× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 62.9×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 109.5×, the 22nd percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 1.0 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 84%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network People Services Technologies Limited — this one | 84%/yr | 81.8× | ₹0.97 |
| One 97 Communications Limited | 34%/yr | 129.1× | ₹3.8 |
| PB Fintech Limited | 50%/yr | 62.9× | ₹1.3 |
| Pine Labs Limited | 36%/yr | 144.3× | ₹4.0 |
| Moneyview Limited | 34%/yr | 28.0× | ₹0.82 |
| Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Limited | — | 32.9× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Financial Technology (Fintech)), it ranks 3 of 11 on returns, 1 of 9 on growth, 4 of 11 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 19.7% on capital, ahead of 73% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹52 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹74 crore on plant and equipment, ₹22 crore more than it made; the gap was from lenders and shareholders. But only about 48 of every 100 rupees of profit it reported over 9 years arrived as cash — the rest is tied up. Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 196 days for its cash to waiting 140 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
Not enough filed accounts to run these checks yet.
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Announced 11 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹56 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+66.1%
Revenue vs last quarter
-8.9%
Net profit
₹11 Cr
Profit vs last year
+57.9%
Profit vs last quarter
-7.9%
Net margin
19.6%
EPS
₹5.26
Earnings call transcript · 12 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹3,680 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹1,752.20
- 52w High
- ₹2,058
- 52w Low
- ₹847
- Enterprise value
- ₹3,385 Cr
- Beta
- 1.5
- Price CAGR 1y
- -3.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 53.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 139.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 8.1%
- PEG ratio
- 1.0
- P/E ratio
- 81.8
- P/B ratio
- 8.3
- EV / EBITDA
- 61.5
- Industry P/E
- 62.6
- ROCE
- 19.7%
- ROCE 5y average
- 43.6%
- ROE
- 15.0%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.0
- Interest coverage
- 56.0
- Dividend yield
- 0.1%
- ROE 3y average
- 29.0%
- ROE last year
- 15.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹195 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹41 Cr
- Operating margin
- 26.0%
- Net profit margin
- 21.0%
- EBITDA margin
- 26.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- 68.2%
- Sales growth 5y
- 67.0%
- Profit growth 3y
- 84.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 107.0%
- EPS
- ₹19.6
- Sales growth TTM
- 47.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 25.0%
- Dividend payout
- 10.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹56 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹11 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 68.0%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 57.1%
- OPM latest quarter
- 24.5%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹210
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹14 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹309 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹14 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 20.0
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- -₹45 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹93 Cr
- FCF yield
- -2.6%
- Net cash flow
- ₹208 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 60.5%
- FII holding
- 0.1%
- DII holding
- 10.0%
- Public holding
- 29.4%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One 97 | 1,661.60 | 131.5 | 1,06,693 | 0.00 | 220.0 | 57.6 | 2,448.0 | 27.6 | 5.0 |
| PB Fintech. | 1,015.00 | 62.8 | 46,969 | 0.00 | 162.9 | 92.5 | 1,888.3 | 40.1 | 10.3 |
| Pine Labs | 170.60 | 152.2 | 19,700 | 0.00 | 19.6 | 308.6 | 736.9 | 19.6 | 4.2 |
| Moneyview | 59.92 | 26.9 | 10,547 | 0.00 | 18.3 | ||||
| Manipal Payment | 354.15 | 28.4 | 8,209 | 0.00 | 76.0 | 120.6 | 409.3 | 44.3 | 43.3 |
| Seshaasai Tech. | 365.40 | 22.0 | 5,912 | 0.69 | 61.8 | 68.3 | 376.2 | 21.0 | 28.0 |
| AvenuesAI | 15.27 | 18.0 | 5,328 | 0.00 | 84.8 | 24.3 | 2,680.4 | 109.4 | 7.7 |
| Network People | 1,785.15 | 83.4 | 3,724 | 0.11 | 11.1 | 53.7 | 56.5 | 68.0 | 19.7 |
| Median | 205.22 | 28.4 | 5,620 | 0.00 | 19.6 | 63.0 | 376.2 | 33.7 | 14.1 |
Competes with: Affle 3i Limited, AvenuesAI Limited, Cyient Limited, Inventurus Knowledge Solutions Limited, L&T Technology Services Limited, Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Limited, Moneyview Limited, Netweb Technologies India Limited, One 97 Communications Limited, One Mobikwik Systems Limited, PB Fintech Limited, Pine Labs Limited, SAGILITY LIMITED, Seshaasai Technologies Limited, Suvidhaa Infoserve Limited, Tata Technologies Limited, Turtlemint Fintech Solutions Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 24 | 28 | 31 | 44 | 59 | 67 | 21 | 26 | 34 | 47 | 53 | 62 | 56 |
| Expenses | 17 | 19 | 21 | 29 | 38 | 44 | 15 | 18 | 24 | 33 | 38 | 49 | 43 |
| Material Cost | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 0 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 2.03 | 17 | ||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Employee Cost | 9.45 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
| Other Expenses | 14 | 22 | 27 | 37 | 15 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 8 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 21 | 23 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| OPM % | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 35 | 31 | 33 | 29 | 29 | 27 | 21 | 25 |
| Other Income | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Depreciation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Profit before tax | 6 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 24 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 16 | 14 |
| Tax % | 17 | 32 | 25 | 24 | 26 | 24 | 25 | 37 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 23 | 24 |
| Net Profit | 5 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 16 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 11 |
| EPS in Rs | 2.66 | 2.58 | 3.37 | 5.18 | 8.06 | 9.36 | 2.65 | 2.69 | 3.71 | 4.72 | 5.53 | 5.87 | 5.30 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 3.70 | 4.40 | 5.92 | 6.17 | 5.26 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 18 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 19 | 41 | 128 | 173 | 195 | 218 |
| Expenses | 15 | 15 | 13 | 12 | 16 | 29 | 85 | 113 | 144 | 163 |
| Material Cost | 0 | |||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 2.04 | |||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | |||||||||
| Employee Cost | 41 | |||||||||
| Other Expenses | 101 | |||||||||
| Operating Profit | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 43 | 60 | 51 | 55 |
| OPM % | 14 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 18 | 30 | 34 | 35 | 26 | 25 |
| Other Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 18 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | |||||||||
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.34 | 1 | 1 |
| Depreciation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9.60 | 6.88 | 9 | 12 |
| Profit before tax | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 36 | 60 | 55 | 60 |
| Tax % | 28 | 28 | 27 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 26 | |
| Net Profit | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 27 | 45 | 41 | 45 |
| EPS in Rs | 4.17 | 4.50 | 3.47 | 0.80 | 0.77 | 3.36 | 14 | 23 | 20 | 21 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 21 | |||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 67%
- 3 years
- 68%
- TTM
- 47%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 107%
- 3 years
- 84%
- TTM
- 25%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 139%
- 3 years
- 53%
- 1 year
- -3%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 28%
- 3 years
- 29%
- Last year
- 15%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 19 | 19 | 21 |
| Reserves | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 22 | 38 | 84 | 420 |
| Borrowings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 14 |
| Other Liabilities | 5 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 33 | 54 |
| Minority Interest | 0.75 | ||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 8 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 30 | 39 | 80 | 146 | 508 |
| Fixed Assets | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 13 | 30 |
| CWIP | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 25 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other Assets | 6 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 20 | 26 | 70 | 132 | 452 |
| Total Assets | 8 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 30 | 39 | 80 | 146 | 508 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | -7 | 24 | 51 | 29 | -45 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -3 | -2 | -3 | -3 | -5 | -6 | -33 | 8 | -42 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -0 | -0 | -0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | -0 | 7 | 296 |
| Net Cash Flow | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 44 | 208 |
| Free Cash Flow | -1 | -1 | 0 | -0 | -13 | 18 | 48 | 18 | -93 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 57 | 51 | 52 | 175 | 95 | 8 | 3 | 67 | 195 |
| Inventory Days | 4 | ||||||||
| Days Payable | 153 | ||||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 57 | 51 | 52 | 175 | 95 | 8 | 3 | 67 | 195 |
| Working Capital Days | -11 | 17 | -6 | -4 | 196 | -31 | -43 | -4 | 140 |
| ROCE % | 48 | 28 | 23 | 14 | 35 | 80 | 69 | 20 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-295inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
54,85,028inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Network People Services Technologies Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
16 Sept, 18:30 IST · Company event · medium impact
A promoter bought Rs 4.80 crore of Network People Services Technologies Limited
16 Sept, 18:30 IST · Company event · medium impact
A promoter bought Rs 7.76 crore of Network People Services Technologies Limited
31 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in Network People Services Technologies Limited.
26 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in Network People Services Technologies Limited.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- Affle 3i Limited
- AvenuesAI Limited
- Cyient Limited
- Inventurus Knowledge Solutions Limited
- L&T Technology Services Limited
- Manipal Payment and Identity Solutions Limited
- Moneyview Limited
- Netweb Technologies India Limited
- One 97 Communications Limited
- One Mobikwik Systems Limited
- PB Fintech Limited
- Pine Labs Limited
- SAGILITY LIMITED
- Seshaasai Technologies Limited
- Suvidhaa Infoserve Limited
- Tata Technologies Limited
- Turtlemint Fintech Solutions Limited
Uses as raw material
- Cloud / hosted infrastructure, servers
- QR and Soundbox payment devices (via device OEM partnerships)
- Software development & engineering capacity
Sells to
- Banks, cooperative banks, payment aggregators, NBFCs & merchants · TSP + PPaaS: UPI switch, IMPS switch, EVOK payment platform, RegTech, merchant acquiring (…
- Canara Bank · Delivered a Super App / UPI payment infrastructure to Canara Bank (large PSU bank) — TSP +…
- Indian Overseas Bank · Voice-based UPI payments mandate; UPI/payment technology
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- Financial Technology (Fintech)
- Classification
- Financial Services › Financial Technology (Fintech)
- ISIN
- INE0FFK01017
News impact
Big market events that reach Network People Services Technologies Limited, and how the effect spreads.
24 Sept, 15:11 IST · Market event · medium impact
UPI may fetch Rs 15,000 crore with 0.4% MDR
A report says a 0.4% UPI merchant fee could create Rs 15,000 crore yearly, helping big banks and payment firms while leaving shops and shoppers to foot the bill.
Who it hits first
- A report estimates a small 0.4% merchant fee (MDR) on UPI shop payments could create a Rs 15,000 crore yearly pool.
- State Bank of India, the country's largest public bank, and HDFC Bank, the largest private bank, handle huge UPI volumes and would share in that fee income.
- Payment firms such as Paytm, Pine Labs and MobiKwik, which provide UPI apps and shop checkout machines, would also gain a slice if fees are shared.
Who may gain
- Big UPI banks such as State Bank of India and HDFC Bank, which would earn fees on merchant payments they process
- Payment firms such as Paytm, Pine Labs and MobiKwik, which run UPI apps and shop checkout machines that share in fees
- Payment-tech vendors such as NPST, which sell processing software to banks riding a fee-funded upgrade
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, small shops and merchants who accept UPI would pay the new fee, while shoppers could face pass-through costs if stores raise prices.
Upstream
Upstream, tech vendors that feed the banks, including Pine Labs for checkout machines plus software and messaging firms like TCS, KFintech and Tanla, could see more orders if fee-funded UPI investment rises.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand turns paid: shops pay a small cut on each UPI sale, and that fee flows to the banks and payment firms that move the money.
Capital
Investor money leans toward large UPI banks and proven payment firms on fee hopes, while staying selective on loss-making apps.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Banks and payment firms rise on new fee income while insurers, asset managers, exchanges and lenders without UPI links stay flat.
When it plays out
Immediate
In the first week banks and payment shares firm on the fee math while merchants complain about new costs.
Medium term
If a fee is approved in coming months, acquirers book steady fee income and payment-tech orders pick up.
Short term
Over the next few weeks policy signals show whether the government will allow paid UPI or keep it free.
23 Sept, 21:59 IST · Market event · medium impact
SBI expects surplus from new UPI MDR charges
SBI expects extra fee income from new UPI transaction charges, which helps big UPI banks and payment firms but can raise costs for merchants and shoppers who bear the charges.
Who it hits first
- State Bank of India, the country's biggest lender and UPI player, expects to earn a surplus from newly introduced UPI transaction (MDR) charges.
- The charge turns UPI volumes from a cost centre into fee income for acquiring and issuing banks.
- Payment intermediaries such as Paytm, MobiKwik, Pine Labs and NPST sit in the same chain but must share the fee pool with banks.
- Merchants and possibly shoppers ultimately bear the charge, which could slightly dampen small-ticket digital payments.
Who may gain
- State Bank of India: direct fee-income surplus on its outsized UPI volumes.
- Other UPI acquirer banks such as RBL Bank and IndusInd Bank: smaller but real fee readthrough.
- UPI software and terminal providers (NPST, KFin Technologies, Pine Labs): steadier customer tech spend.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, merchants accepting UPI absorb the new charge or pass it to shoppers, slightly raising the cost of small digital sales.
Upstream
SBI technology and service suppliers such as Pine Labs (payment terminals) and KFin Technologies (registrar and software) could see steadier orders if SBI reinvests its surplus in platforms.
Where demand moves
Business
Payment-fee demand flows from merchants (who pay the MDR charge) through acquirer banks like SBI to their technology suppliers such as Pine Labs, NPST and KFin Technologies.
Capital
Investors are likely to rotate modestly toward large UPI-exposed banks on the fee-income upgrade, while richly priced fintech names see sympathy moves without earnings support.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Positive for banks with UPI scale through new fee income; neutral for insurers, asset managers and exchanges with no MDR link.
When it plays out
Immediate
Bank stocks with big UPI books firm as the surplus headline is priced; fintech names see a sympathy bounce.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months SBI quarterly fee income shows whether the surplus is material or competed away.
Short term
Moves fade or extend over 1-4 weeks as actual MDR rates, the sharing split and merchant reaction become clear.
21 Sept, 21:47 IST · Market event · high impact
Mastercard to exit Pine Labs in $93 million block deal
Mastercard is selling up to 49.7 million Pine Labs shares for Rs 893 crore, pressing Pine Labs stock and softening fintech peers like Paytm, while block buyers pick up shares at a discount.
Who it hits first
- Mastercard, the global card network, will sell up to 49.7 million shares of Pine Labs (a payment-terminal company) for up to Rs 893 crore, about $93 million, through a block deal (a large pre-arranged share sale).
- Pine Labs, which supplies card machines to HDFC Bank, SBI, Axis Bank and ICICI Bank, faces near-term share pressure as this large parcel hits the market.
- Payment rivals One 97 Communications (Paytm), PB Fintech (Policybazaar), MobiKwik and NPST soften in sympathy as fintech investors mark down the sector.
- The business itself is untouched: terminals keep working, banks keep paying fees, and only the shareholder list changes.
Who may gain
- Institutional block buyers - pick up a large Pine Labs parcel at a discount to market
- Vanguard index funds - already bought 8.235 million and 8.533 million Pine Labs shares and can absorb more
- No business beneficiary - Pine Labs operations and its bank customers are unaffected, so gains flow only to buyers of the discounted shares
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, Pine Labs customers HDFC Bank, SBI, Axis Bank and ICICI Bank keep using its terminals with no disruption - an investor exit does not switch off machines or change processing fees.
Upstream
Upstream, Pine Labs hardware and service vendors (Optiemus, EFCIL) see no order change, since Pine Labs keeps buying and deploying terminals as before.
Where demand moves
Business
No business demand change: Pine Labs still runs payment terminals for HDFC Bank, SBI, Axis Bank and ICICI Bank, shoppers still pay the same way, and Mastercard cards keep working - this is an investor selling shares, not a customer cancelling orders.
Capital
Capital flows from Mastercard (selling up to 49.7 million shares) to block buyers such as index funds; Pine Labs stock dips on the extra supply and fintech peers (Paytm, Policybazaar, MobiKwik, NPST) soften in sympathy until the parcel is absorbed.
How it spreads across sectors
Banking
Pine Labs bank customers (HDFC Bank, SBI, Axis, ICICI) see no service change; terminal fees and volumes continue as normal.
Financial Services
Pine Labs dips on block supply while payment peers (Paytm, MobiKwik, NPST, Policybazaar) soften in sympathy; sentiment steadies once the parcel clears.
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days, Pine Labs stock trades weak on the block discount and placement news while peers drift soft; the discount size sets the floor.
Medium term
In 1-6 months, the overhang clears, the shareholder base broadens toward index funds, and Pine Labs trades on terminal growth and profits again.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks, the block is absorbed by institutions, Pine Labs stabilises, and peer fintech names recover as sentiment normalises.
28 Jun, 10:41 IST · Market event · medium impact
Private sector key to India-US AI tie-up: K Nagaraj Naidu, Addl Secy, MEA
Who it hits first
- Indian IT-services & AI firms get a favorable policy environment for US-India tech collaboration
- AI-infrastructure/server (NETWEB), chip-design (MOSCHIP) and design-engineering (TATAELXSI) firms positioned for cross-border AI co-development
- Soft MEA statement (not a binding deal/contract) -> modest, medium-term, sentiment-led impact
Who may gain
- AI-compute hardware (NETWEB)
- Semiconductor/chip-design (MOSCHIP)
- Engineering R&D/design (TATAELXSI)
- Govt/e-governance tech (SILVERTUC)
- Payments/fintech tech (NPST)
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Enterprises and government departments adopting AI become downstream consumers of Indian IT-services and SaaS (TATAELXSI, AMAGI, NPST, SILVERTUC).
Upstream
AI-server/electronics assemblers (NETWEB, TVSELECT) pull demand for imported GPUs/semiconductors and components; deeper India-US ties may ease access to advanced US chips and design tools.
Where demand moves
Business
Favorable India-US AI policy could route US enterprise/government AI workloads, co-development and procurement toward Indian IT-services and AI-infrastructure vendors; domestic AI-server (NETWEB) and chip-design (MOSCHIP) firms gain order-pipeline optionality as localisation is encouraged.
Capital
Thematic India-US AI rotation favours mid/small-cap IT and electronics names; institutional flows likely concentrate first in liquid large-cap IT and proven AI-infra plays before speculative small-caps.
How it spreads across sectors
Defence
dual-use AI/defence-electronics cooperation
Electronics
hardware/electronics localisation (note: no Electronics Company nodes in Neo4j)
IT Services
positive policy tailwind for US deals
Information Technology
AI demand pull
codex additions
- Data Centres & Digital Infrastructure
- Telecom & 5G Network Infrastructure
- Power Utilities & Grid Equipment
- Capital Goods & Electrical Equipment
- Cybersecurity & Digital Trust
- Cloud/SaaS & Digital Platforms
- Education, Skilling & HR Services
- Legal, Compliance & Data Governance Services
- Media, Internet & Ad-Tech
When it plays out
Immediate
Soft MEA statement, not a binding deal -> minimal immediate price reaction; at most a thematic pop in AI-narrative small-caps.
Medium term
Structural tailwind if cooperation translates to US AI workloads, chip access and co-development; benefits accrue to fundamentally strong, reasonably valued names rather than richly-valued narrative plays.
Short term
Watch for concrete iCET/TRUST follow-through (MoUs, AI/chip procurement, US chip-access easing).
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"India-US AI cooperation -\u003e higher enterprise/cloud AI workloads -\u003e need for domestic data-centre capacity, power-dense hosting, cooling and managed infrastructure","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ANANTRAJ","ESCONET","STLTECH"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Second-order beneficiary from AI compute localisation, distinct from server hardware. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Data Centres \u0026 Digital Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"AI tie-up -\u003e more cloud/edge AI use cases -\u003e higher data traffic and enterprise private-network demand -\u003e capex in fiber, 5G, edge connectivity","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","INDUSTOWER","TEJASNET"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on actual enterprise AI deployment. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Telecom \u0026 5G Network Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"AI compute and data-centre expansion -\u003e rising electricity demand and reliability needs -\u003e demand for power supply, grid gear, transformers, backup","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","TRIL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"AI infrastructure is power-intensive; gradual but structurally supportive. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Power Utilities \u0026 Grid Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Strategic-tech cooperation -\u003e more investment in electronics, data centres and semiconductor-adjacent facilities -\u003e demand for automation, switchgear, power systems","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SIEMENS","ABB","CGPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Broader capex enabler, not a direct AI beneficiary. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Capital Goods \u0026 Electrical Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cross-border AI collaboration -\u003e greater data-sharing, model-security and compliance needs -\u003e demand for cybersecurity, identity, cloud-security, managed security","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["QUICKHEAL","SAKSOFT","CYIENT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Listed pure-play cybersecurity choices limited in India. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cybersecurity \u0026 Digital Trust","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Favorable India-US AI policy -\u003e easier enterprise AI partnerships and productisation -\u003e SaaS firms embed AI, improve pricing power, address US clients","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NEWGEN","RATEGAIN","INTELLECT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit from product/platform AI monetisation. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cloud/SaaS \u0026 Digital Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"AI collaboration narrative -\u003e demand for AI talent, reskilling, certifications, hiring support -\u003e training and staffing firms see higher enterprise spend","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NIITLTD","TEAMLEASE","QUESS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Lagged, dependent on corporate training budgets. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Education, Skilling \u0026 HR Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"India-US AI cooperation -\u003e more cross-border data, IP, model-risk and regulatory work -\u003e demand for compliance tech, governance workflows, regtech","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CAMS","KFINTECH","INTELLECT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Mostly indirect; exposure via compliance-heavy fintech platforms. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Legal, Compliance \u0026 Data Governance Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"AI tools and US partnerships -\u003e faster content generation, personalisation, ad targeting -\u003e productivity upside but disruption to legacy content models","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NAZARA","ZEEL","AFFLE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"AI lowers costs for digital firms while pressuring traditional content economics. (Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Media, Internet \u0026 Ad-Tech","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
28 Jun, 01:56 IST · Market event · medium impact
Truist Cuts PT on Accenture (ACN) Following Q3 Report
Who it hits first
- Truist cut its price target on Accenture (ACN; US-listed, not in the Indian knowledge graph) after Q3, signaling softer global IT-services discretionary demand. As the sector bellwether, ACN's caution reads through to the largest Indian IT exporters (TCS, INFY, WIPRO, HCLTECH) and richly-valued mid/small-cap IT names — a sentiment overhang, not a hard order-book shock.
Who may gain
- No material domestic beneficiary — a demand-softness read-through has no clear winner. Within IT, relative preference rotates toward cheaper, stronger-balance-sheet large caps (TCS PE 14.5, INFY PE 14) over richly-valued mid/small caps; domestic-revenue (NPST) and AI-hardware (NETWEB) names are insulated rather than beneficiaries.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream are global enterprise buyers (BFSI, retail, communications). Accenture's caution implies these clients may defer discretionary transformation projects, trimming the incremental deal flow Indian vendors win — the core read-through channel.
Upstream
Indian IT's upstream is talent and subcontractor capacity. A softer demand outlook marginally eases wage and subcontractor cost pressure but also signals slower hiring — no acute upstream supply disruption from this event.
Where demand moves
Business
Softer global IT-services discretionary spend trims incremental deal-flow and pricing for export-led Indian IT (TCS, INFY, WIPRO, HCLTECH and mid-caps like TATAELXSI, SILVERTUC). Domestic-revenue names (NPST UPI payments, TVSELECT hardware) and the AI-hardware capex pool (NETWEB) are largely insulated from this channel.
Capital
Risk-off rotation out of high-beta and richly-valued IT mid/small caps (TATAELXSI PE 251, NETWEB beta 1.72, MOSCHIP) toward cheaper defensive large caps (TCS, INFY); some capital exits the IT sector entirely into non-cyclical defensives until Q1 FY27 results clarify the demand trajectory.
How it spreads across sectors
IT Services
Muted near-term price reaction with a demand-outlook overhang carried into Q1 FY27 results; relative preference for quality large caps.
Information Technology
Sentiment de-rating risk concentrated in richly-valued mid/small caps; domestic and AI-hardware names insulated.
When it plays out
Immediate
Mild negative open for IT large caps (historically within ±1-2% on Accenture read-through days); high-beta mid caps move more on sentiment.
Medium term
Direction set by actual booking/revenue trajectory; a richly-valued IT mid-cap cohort carries the most de-rating risk if softness is confirmed, while quality large caps with cheap valuations have limited downside.
Short term
Demand-outlook overhang persists into Q1 FY27 results season; watch management deal-pipeline and discretionary-spend commentary for confirmation or relief.
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 18 Sep 2026 | unspecified | ₹2 |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹2 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 22 rows from NSE's archive (replace 17, delete 0, insert 5), 2021-10-25..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 25 Oct 2021
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Sep 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 1,32,924 | ₹1,847.16 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | JUNOMONETA FINSOL PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 1,32,453 | ₹1,846.25 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 1,26,954 | ₹1,858.50 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 1,26,954 | ₹1,859.89 |
Insider trades
| Disclosed | Who | Type | Shares | Value ₹ Cr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 Sep 2026 | SAVITA VASHIST · Promoter and Director | SELL | 82,313 | 13.00 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | DEEPAK CHAND THAKUR · Promoter and Director | BUY | 49,032 | 7.76 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | ASHISH AGGARWAL · Promoter and Director | BUY | 30,491 | 4.80 |
| 16 Sep 2026 | DEEPAK CHAND THAKUR · Promoter and Director | BUY | 1,246 | 0.20 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call13 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY2712 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY2612 Feb 2026
- Annual report · 2024-256 Sep 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.