NMDC Steel Limited
NSE: NSLNISPIron & Steel
Share price
₹39.10
-3.58% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
58
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹11,460 Cr
P/E ratio
136.4
P/B ratio
0.9
ROCE
3.1%
ROE
0.4%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Our sales figures for this company step up at Dec 2023 and we hold nothing that says why, so we cannot honestly quote a growth rate across it.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
Our sales figures for this company step up at Dec 2023 and we hold nothing that says why, so there is no honest growth rate of its own to set against its sector.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
It has no steady three-year profit record yet, so growth cannot be weighed against the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMDC Steel Limited — this one | — | 136.4× | — |
| JSW Steel | 35%/yr | 23.9× | ₹0.68 |
| Tata Steel | 10%/yr | 18.1× | ₹1.8 |
| JINDAL STEEL LIMITED | 1%/yr | 33.4× | ₹33.4 |
| Steel Authority of India | 26%/yr | 14.2× | ₹0.55 |
| Jindal Stainless Limited | 15%/yr | 17.7× | ₹1.2 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Iron & Steel), it ranks 12 of 13 on returns, 9 of 13 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 3.1% on capital, ahead of 8% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹3196 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹5329 crore on plant and equipment, ₹2133 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹1691 crore to ₹4613 crore. It has not made a profit over 7 years.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
6 of 8 checks clear · 75%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Net profit nearly doubled from a year earlier to ₹50.5 crore on 8.8% higher revenue.
Announced 15 Aug 2026 · Standalone · Unaudited
Revenue
₹3,662 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+8.8%
Revenue vs last quarter
-5.6%
Net profit
₹51 Cr
Profit vs last year
+94.3%
Profit vs last quarter
-87.1%
Net margin
1.4%
EPS
₹0.19
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹11,460 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹39.10
- 52w High
- ₹53.8
- 52w Low
- ₹33.0
- Enterprise value
- ₹15,273 Cr
- Beta
- 1.3
- Price CAGR 1y
- -10.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- -8.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- —
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 0.2%
- PEG ratio
- —
- P/E ratio
- 136.4
- P/B ratio
- 0.9
- EV / EBITDA
- 10.1
- Industry P/E
- 16.5
- ROCE
- 3.1%
- ROCE 5y average
- -3.8%
- ROE
- 0.4%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.4
- Interest coverage
- 1.2
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- -9.0%
- ROE last year
- 0.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹13,642 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹59 Cr
- Operating margin
- 11.0%
- Net profit margin
- 0.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 11.1%
- Sales growth 3y
- —
- Sales growth 5y
- —
- Profit growth 3y
- —
- Profit growth 5y
- 468.0%
- EPS
- ₹0.2
- Sales growth TTM
- 42.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 105.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹3,662 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹51 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 8.8%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 96.2%
- OPM latest quarter
- 10.9%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹44.9
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹4,613 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹800 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹4,613 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 3.5
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹1,796 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹1,538 Cr
- FCF yield
- 9.2%
- Net cash flow
- ₹2 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 60.8%
- FII holding
- 5.5%
- DII holding
- 15.8%
- Public holding
- 17.9%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JSW Steel | 1,181.50 | 24.0 | 2,88,930 | 0.58 | 4,696.0 | 113.0 | 47,364.0 | 9.8 | 11.0 |
| Tata Steel | 172.70 | 18.2 | 2,15,590 | 2.30 | 2,385.2 | 16.8 | 60,794.3 | 14.3 | 12.5 |
| Jindal Steel | 1,017.40 | 33.6 | 1,03,784 | 0.19 | 843.8 | -43.5 | 15,482.1 | 25.9 | 9.7 |
| S A I L | 169.70 | 14.5 | 70,095 | 1.35 | 1,644.1 | 134.3 | 26,245.7 | 1.3 | 7.9 |
| Jindal Stain. | 717.95 | 18.0 | 59,189 | 0.55 | 768.7 | 7.7 | 11,278.5 | 10.5 | 19.3 |
| Sarda Energy | 495.60 | 15.5 | 17,464 | 0.40 | 478.1 | 5.5 | 1,608.0 | -1.5 | 16.9 |
| NMDC Steel | 39.88 | 139.7 | 11,687 | 0.00 | 50.5 | 97.6 | 3,661.8 | 8.8 | 3.1 |
| Median | 143.02 | 18.0 | 11,416 | 0.24 | 174.4 | 32.7 | 2,672.2 | 12.7 | 9.7 |
Competes with: JINDAL STEEL LIMITED, JSW Steel, Jai Balaji Industries Limited, Jindal Stainless Limited, Manaksia Steels Limited, Mukand Limited, Prakash Industries Limited, Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Limited, Sarda Energy & Minerals Limited, Scan Steels Limited, Steel Authority of India, Tata Steel, Vedanta Iron and Steel Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 0 | 277 | 926 | 1,846 | 2,023 | 1,522 | 2,120 | 2,838 | 3,365 | 3,390 | 3,008 | 3,879 | 3,662 |
| Expenses | 0 | 350 | 1,335 | 2,801 | 2,424 | 1,963 | 2,776 | 3,129 | 2,958 | 3,183 | 2,910 | 3,073 | 3,262 |
| Material Cost | 1,865 | 2,046 | 2,014 | 2,237 | 2,298 | 2,509 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 440 | 102 | 357 | -149 | -12 | -121 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 27 | 22 | 22 | 52 | 41 | 31 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 796 | 788 | 790 | 770 | 747 | 843 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 0 | -72 | -409 | -956 | -401 | -441 | -656 | -291 | 408 | 207 | 98 | 806 | 400 |
| OPM % | -26 | -44 | -52 | -20 | -29 | -31 | -10 | 12 | 6.11 | 3.24 | 21 | 11 | |
| Other Income | 0 | 13 | 16 | 90 | 21 | 13 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 19 | 26 | 43 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 0 | 41 | 134 | 155 | 153 | 161 | 165 | 172 | 134 | 128 | 128 | 96 | 126 |
| Depreciation | 0 | 75 | 226 | 252 | 239 | 240 | 253 | 221 | 258 | 283 | 252 | 249 | 242 |
| Profit before tax | 0 | -175 | -753 | -1,273 | -772 | -829 | -1,056 | -664 | 36 | -183 | -264 | 486 | 74 |
| Tax % | -25 | -25 | -32 | -29 | -28 | -28 | -29 | 29 | -37 | -8 | 19 | 32 | |
| Net Profit | 0 | -131 | -568 | -861 | -547 | -595 | -758 | -473 | 26 | -115 | -244 | 392 | 51 |
| EPS in Rs | 0 | -0.45 | -1.94 | -2.94 | -1.87 | -2.03 | -2.59 | -1.62 | 0.09 | -0.39 | -0.83 | 1.34 | 0.17 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -1.62 | 0.09 | -0.39 | -0.83 | 1.34 | 0.19 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3,049 | 8,503 | 13,642 | 13,938 |
| Expenses | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,485 | 10,291 | 12,123 | 12,428 |
| Material Cost | 7,256 | 8,594 | ||||||
| Change in Inventories | 281 | 298 | ||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Employee Cost | 95 | 137 | ||||||
| Other Expenses | 2,659 | 3,095 | ||||||
| Operating Profit | -0 | -0 | 0 | 0 | -1,436 | -1,788 | 1,518 | 1,510 |
| OPM % | -47 | -21 | 11 | 11 | ||||
| Other Income | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 119 | 72 | 86 | 109 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 331 | 652 | 487 | 479 |
| Depreciation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 553 | 953 | 1,042 | 1,026 |
| Profit before tax | -0 | -0 | 0 | 0 | -2,201 | -3,322 | 76 | 114 |
| Tax % | 0 | 0 | -29 | -29 | 23 | |||
| Net Profit | -0 | -0 | 0 | 0 | -1,560 | -2,374 | 59 | 84 |
| EPS in Rs | 0 | -5.32 | -8.10 | 0.20 | 0.29 | |||
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -8.10 | 0.20 | ||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- —
- TTM
- 42%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 468%
- 3 years
- —
- TTM
- 105%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- -8%
- 1 year
- -10%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -5%
- 3 years
- -9%
- Last year
- 0%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0 | 2,931 | 2,931 | 2,931 | 2,931 |
| Reserves | -0 | -0 | 17,049 | 14,118 | 12,558 | 10,184 | 10,243 |
| Borrowings | 0 | 0 | 1,691 | 3,842 | 6,662 | 5,909 | 4,613 |
| Other Liabilities | 0 | 0 | 1,765 | 4,678 | 7,218 | 9,444 | 10,451 |
| Total Liabilities | 0 | 0 | 20,504 | 25,568 | 29,368 | 28,467 | 28,237 |
| Fixed Assets | 0 | 0 | 1,132 | 1,118 | 20,273 | 20,131 | 19,452 |
| CWIP | 0 | 0 | 17,038 | 19,545 | 1,215 | 717 | 570 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 0 | 0 | 2,334 | 4,904 | 7,881 | 7,619 | 8,215 |
| Total Assets | 0 | 0 | 20,504 | 25,568 | 29,368 | 28,470 | 28,237 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -0 | -0 | 743 | 1,516 | -2,825 | 1,966 | 1,796 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 0 | 0 | -1,891 | -2,189 | -228 | -506 | 109 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 0 | 0 | 1,144 | 1,293 | 2,439 | -1,460 | -1,902 |
| Net Cash Flow | -0 | -0 | -4 | 620 | -614 | 0 | 2 |
| Free Cash Flow | -0 | -0 | -1,148 | -639 | -3,409 | 1,538 | 1,525 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 4 | 8 | 5 | ||||
| Inventory Days | 420 | 148 | 160 | ||||
| Days Payable | 284 | 234 | 248 | ||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 141 | -77 | -83 | ||||
| Working Capital Days | -92 | -213 | -175 | ||||
| ROCE % | -200 | 0 | 0 | -9 | -13 | 3 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
3,813inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
13,05,45,455inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about NMDC Steel Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
28 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in NMDC Steel Limited.
28 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Significant increase in volume has been observed in NMDC Steel Limited.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Dolomite
- Limestone
Depends on the price of
- Coking Coal
- Iron Ore
- steel
Buys from
- Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Limited · oxygen, nitrogen, argon — on-site O&M of ASU plants at Nagarnar, Chhattisgarh
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Metals & Mining
- Industry
- Iron & Steel
- Classification
- Metals & Mining › Iron & Steel
- ISIN
- INE0NNS01018
Plants
- Nagarnar Integrated Steel Plant
News impact
Big market events that reach NMDC Steel Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 22:37 IST · Market event · medium impact
Tata Steel receives tribunal approval for subsidiary merger
Tata Steel won tribunal approval to merge its subsidiaries into itself, trimming costs and simplifying the group for its shareholders, with no effect on rival steelmakers.
Who it hits first
- Tata Steel, one of India's biggest steelmakers, won tribunal approval to merge its subsidiaries into itself.
- The cleanup cuts duplicate costs and paperwork and pools cash across the group, but adds no steel output or customers.
- Rival steelmakers, steel buyers and raw-material suppliers feel no direct change from this internal reshuffle.
Who may gain
- Tata Steel (steelmaker): lower overheads and simpler accounts once the merger completes.
- Tata Steel shareholders: a leaner group structure that can lift earnings per share over time.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, car, truck and construction buyers of Tata Steel pay the same prices, as steel supply is unchanged.
Upstream
Upstream, miners and equipment suppliers to Tata Steel see no order change, since the merger adds no furnace or mine.
Where demand moves
Business
No new steel demand is created: the same mills, customers and volumes, just owned more simply, so business demand flow is flat.
Capital
Investors may pay a small premium for a simpler Tata Steel with lower costs, but no fresh money flows to rivals or suppliers.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
No link: vehicle makers buying Tata steel see no price or supply change.
Capital Goods
No link: equipment suppliers to steel plants gain no new orders from paperwork.
Metals & Mining
Neutral: an internal Tata cleanup moves no steel price, volume or input cost for peers.
When it plays out
Immediate
In the first week, expect a mild positive drift in Tata Steel shares on the cleared overhang, with peers unmoved.
Medium term
Over one to six months, actual cost savings and cleaner accounts decide whether the market rewards the simpler structure.
Short term
Over the next few weeks, watch for the merger record date and share-swap details that set the final terms.
30 Sept, 17:36 IST · Market event · medium impact
India's SAIL airlifts coking coal from Mongolia in first test to diversify supplies
Steel Authority of India test-flew steel-making coal from Mongolia to cut reliance on Australia, mildly helping SAIL and steel peers while hurting no one.
Who it hits first
- Steel Authority of India, the government-owned steelmaker, test-flew a small load of coking coal (the special coal that fuels blast furnaces) from Mongolia to try a new source beyond Australia.
- The test is a first trial only, so it lowers worry about supply shocks but does not cut costs or raise steel output yet.
- Rival steelmakers such as Tata Steel and JSW Steel, both large steelmakers, get no coal from this flight, only proof that a Mongolia route can work.
Who may gain
- Steel Authority of India, the steelmaker running the trial, gains a little supply safety and positive attention.
- Other steelmakers that burn imported coking coal, like Tata Steel, JSW Steel and Jindal Steel, get a faint hope that Mongolia could one day serve them too.
- Mongolian coal miners gain a possible future buyer in India, though one airlift means no real sales yet.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, buyers of Steel Authority of India steel such as Mazagon Dock Shipbuilders, the shipbuilder, Larsen and Toubro, the engineering and construction group, and Garden Reach Shipbuilders, the shipbuilder, see no change in steel price or delivery from one coal test.
Upstream
Upstream, coking coal today comes mostly from Australia for importers like Steel Authority of India, and Mongolian mines send only this test load, so Australian sellers lose no volume and mine-equipment or coal firms see no new orders.
Where demand moves
Business
No new demand for steel appears — steel buyers order the same tons; the change sits on the input side, where Steel Authority of India tests a backup coal source to keep its furnaces running if Australian supply tightens.
Capital
Investors may pay a touch more for Steel Authority of India and steel peers as supply-risk worry eases, but with only a test flight and no cost saving, no broad buying wave follows.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Neutral for heavy users and makers of plant gear, since steel output and input costs do not move on a coal test.
Metals & Mining
Small positive mood as steelmakers show they can look beyond Australia for coking coal, but with one airlift the effect on earnings stays near zero.
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days, Steel Authority of India shares may firm a touch on the trial news while traders wait for details on cost and coal quality.
Medium term
In 1-6 months, only a shift from costly air freight to rail and sea shipments with steady volumes would turn the test into real supply safety or savings.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks, follow-up notes on whether the Mongolian coal suited the furnaces decide if the route gets a second, larger trial.
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
India notifies the MMDR Amendment Act 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling unpaid pre-Act state levies - Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh threaten to move the Supreme Court
A new mining law stops state governments charging miners extra taxes on the land their mines sit on and wipes out the unpaid old bills, which saves money for miners like Coal India, NMDC, Tata Steel and SAIL - but the states say they will fight it in the Supreme Court.
Who it hits first
- Companies that own their own mines in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh no longer face open-ended state cess bills. Tata Steel, SAIL, NMDC, Coal India and Hindustan Copper had been staring at instalment payments that were due to start from April 2026, and the unpaid part of those bills is now wiped out.
- Manganese and copper miners with pits in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan get the same certainty, but a smaller one, because those states never levied the aggressive cesses that the eastern states did.
Who may gain
- NMDC and Coal India, which sell ore and coal at administered prices and could not pass a state cess on to buyers, keep the money instead.
- Integrated steel makers that dig their own iron ore and coal - Tata Steel, SAIL, Jindal Steel - see the cost of self-mined ore stop drifting upward.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, aluminium smelters and thermal power stations that buy domestic ore and coal are the end users. Their input bills stop being exposed to a state deciding to add a new cess mid-contract, which makes long-term supply pricing easier to fix.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and mine-developer-operators get more predictable client budgets, because their customers no longer have to set aside cash for disputed state levies. Adani Enterprises, which runs mines for state generators, is the clearest example.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing changes in how much ore or coal India buys. What changes is who keeps the cash: money that would have flowed from miners to state treasuries stays with the miners. Steel mills that buy ore in the open market may eventually see slightly cheaper ore because sellers no longer have to build a state cess into their price.
Capital
If the relief is believed, money rotates into the companies with the biggest cancelled bills - Tata Steel, SAIL, Coal India, NMDC. So far it has not: the group is flat to down over the eight sessions since the Bill passed, which says investors are waiting to see whether the states win in court before paying for it.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and contract-mining order books become easier to plan once miners are not holding cash back for disputed tax bills.
Metals & Mining
Contingent liabilities set aside for state mineral cesses can be written back, and the cash cost of self-mined ore stops rising.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India, which faced some of the largest state demands on coal-bearing land, keeps cash it had provided for.
Power
Thermal generators buying domestic coal get more predictable fuel costs, since coal suppliers no longer need to price in a possible state cess.
When it plays out
Immediate
Little share-price reaction is likely, because the Act was already notified on 17 August and the market has had eight sessions to react and did not. Watch for companies quantifying the write-back in their September-quarter results.
Medium term
If the Act survives, mining project economics improve permanently and captive-mine expansion becomes easier to underwrite. If it is struck down, the twelve-year instalment clock from the 2024 ruling restarts.
Short term
State governments file in the Supreme Court. Any interim order that stays the Act would hand the relief straight back and hit the same shares.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower legal/tax uncertainty for limestone and other mineral-bearing land reduces contingent cost risk for cement producers with captive mines; if states cannot add mineral levies, royalty-linked input inflation risk eases for clinker/cement capacity in mineral-rich states.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for cement companies with captive limestone exposure or large eastern/central India operations.","sector":"Construction Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cost certainty for iron ore, coal and aggregates can reduce pass-through risk in steel, cement and power inputs; lower perceived project-cost inflation supports EPC margins and road/rail/industrial capex execution.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","PNCINFRA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order effect depends on whether miners and metal producers pass cost relief through to customers.","sector":"Infrastructure \u0026 Construction","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If steel and cement cost pressures ease, construction input-cost volatility declines for developers; lower commodity-linked working-capital stress can support project margins and launch economics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect and likely smaller than demand, interest-rate and local approval drivers.","sector":"Realty","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced tax overhang for domestic iron ore, manganese and steel producers improves steel cost visibility; auto OEMs and component makers benefit if flat/long steel price risk moderates.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More visible for steel-intensive vehicles, forgings and components; pass-through contracts may dilute near-term benefit.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty in steel, copper and aluminium supply chains can stabilize input costs for appliances, cables and electrical goods; improved metal availability reduces procurement risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and depends on commodity price transmission rather than the legal change itself.","sector":"Consumer Durables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cancellation of unpaid pre-Act levies lowers contingent liabilities and credit-risk tail events for leveraged miners, steel producers and power-linked borrowers; banks/NBFCs with commodity-sector exposure may see reduced provisioning risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large diversified lenders see diluted impact; project financiers with metals, mining and power exposure are more relevant.","sector":"Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral extraction and dispatch plans become less constrained by tax uncertainty, rail, port and bulk logistics volumes for coal, iron ore, steel and allied minerals may improve; eastern corridor movement benefits most.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume effect requires actual production/dispatch response, not just accounting relief.","sector":"Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mining-cost certainty for coal, limestone, rock phosphate and mineral inputs can marginally improve domestic raw-material availability and energy-cost visibility for fertilizer and industrial chemical producers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","GNFC","CHAMBLFERT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive input-cost effect may be offset by administered pricing, subsidy timing and global commodity trends.","sector":"Chemicals \u0026 Fertilizers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states lose potential retrospective levy collections, which can pressure state capex, receivables discipline or subsidy payments; utilities and contractors exposed to Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh state entities could see mixed fiscal knock-ons.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","IRB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Not a pure NSE sector classification, but relevant as a cross-sector fiscal transmission channel.","sector":"State-Focused Public Finance / Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
Parliament passes the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling uncollected past mineral levies
Parliament has stopped state governments from charging their own taxes on mining, and cancelled old state demands that were never actually collected - a large windfall for miners and steel makers like Tata Steel, Coal India and NMDC, and a revenue loss for mineral-rich states such as Jharkhand and Odisha.
Who it hits first
- Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026, which stops state governments charging their own taxes and cesses on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, and cancels past state demands that were never actually deposited or recovered. This directly reverses the effect of the Supreme Court's July and August 2024 rulings, which had let states tax minerals and recover those taxes going back to April 2005. Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, limestone and copper - and integrated steel makers with their own captive mines - lose a large, open-ended liability from their accounts.
Who may gain
- Integrated steel makers with captive mines, above all Tata Steel, which had disclosed one of the largest provisions against retrospective state mineral demands.
- Iron-ore, coal and manganese miners - NMDC, Coal India, MOIL and Hindustan Copper - whose per-tonne cost becomes predictable again.
- Cement makers with captive limestone quarries, whose cess exposure is now capped by the Centre rather than open to state discretion.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and power stations that buy these minerals get a more predictable delivered cost, because the risk of a state suddenly adding a cess to their input price is now removed. That improves the reliability of their own margin guidance rather than lowering their costs today.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and equipment suppliers gain, because miners freed of a large contingent liability can restart or accelerate expansion projects. Solar Industries and mine-development contractors sit in this queue, though orders typically follow two to three quarters behind the cash release.
Where demand moves
Business
No physical supply is disrupted, so tonnage does not change hands. What changes is money: a contingent tax claim worth tens of thousands of crores across the industry is cancelled, so cash that miners had set aside stays with them. That cash tends to go into paying down debt and into expansion capital spending, which over the next few quarters means more orders for mining equipment, explosives, and mine-development contractors. In the opposite direction, mineral-rich state governments - Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh - lose an expected revenue stream, which can slow their own infrastructure spending and hurt companies dependent on those state budgets.
Capital
Money should rotate into the metals and mining sector generally, and within it towards the companies that had actually provided for the retrospective demand - those get a direct, quantifiable write-back - rather than towards recyclers and traders that never had the liability. Some money may rotate out of state-government-dependent contractors and state-focused lenders in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and explosives makers benefit as freed-up cash funds expansion.
Construction Materials
Cement makers with captive limestone lose an open-ended state cess risk.
Financial Services
Lenders concentrated in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh face a modest negative as those state budgets lose an expected revenue line.
Metals & Mining
A large contingent liability is removed and future mining costs become predictable.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India's state cess exposure is capped, the single largest such exposure in the country.
Power
Thermal generators get more predictable delivered coal costs.
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect mining and metals stocks to open higher, with the biggest moves in the names that had actually disclosed provisions - Tata Steel, Coal India, NMDC. Note the historical precedent runs the other way and is noisy: on the two adverse Supreme Court dates in 2024 these same stocks closed higher the following day, because the bad news had already been absorbed on the ruling day itself.
Medium term
Over one to six months the durable effect is lower and more predictable mining costs, which supports Indian steel and cement margins. The offsetting risk is that mineral-rich states cut their own capital spending, which would hurt regional contractors and state-focused lenders.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch for companies to quantify the write-back in exchange filings - that is what turns a headline into an earnings number. Jharkhand and Odisha are likely to challenge the law or seek compensation, and any credible legal challenge would take some of the gain back.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Removal of contingent mineral-tax liabilities improves cash-flow visibility and credit metrics for mining, steel, cement and power borrowers; lower probability of stressed working-capital drawdowns or covenant breaches benefits lenders and financiers exposed to these sectors.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is indirect and strongest for lenders with commodity, infrastructure, PSU and project-finance exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower tax uncertainty for coal, iron ore, limestone and metal producers can support mine dispatches, steel/cement production planning and bulk commodity movement; higher freight volumes benefit rail-linked logistics and port handlers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on whether producers convert liability relief into higher output rather than balance-sheet repair.","sector":"Railways \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved capex confidence in steel, metals and mining can lift demand for oxygen, nitrogen, argon, acetylene, electrodes and welding consumables used in smelting, fabrication and maintenance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LINDEINDIA","INOXINDIA","ADORWELD"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order capex and utilization play; not an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Industrial Gases \u0026 Welding Consumables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel, cement and non-ferrous producers facing lower mineral-levy risk may run plants at steadier utilization and restart deferred maintenance/capacity programs, increasing demand for refractory bricks, monolithics and kiln/ladle linings.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["RHIM","IFGLEXPOR","VESUVIUS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant if steel and cement producers expand output after cost visibility improves.","sector":"Refractories \u0026 Industrial Ceramics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral-rich states lose expected retrospective levy revenues, their fiscal room for state-funded roads, irrigation and local infrastructure may tighten; however lower steel/cement cost risk can support project economics for contractors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IRB","PNCINFRA","ASHOKA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative state-capex channel versus positive input-cost visibility channel.","sector":"Roads \u0026 Infrastructure Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cement and steel cost uncertainty eases as limestone, iron ore and coal levy risks are capped; this can improve margin visibility for developers and building-material users if input prices stabilize.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","OBEROIRLTY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pass-through and demand conditions matter more than the tax change, so the link is defensible but diluted.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty around steel, aluminium and copper supply costs can reduce input-cost volatility for vehicle makers and component suppliers, especially if metal producers pass through some benefit via prices or stable contracts.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Third-order effect; stronger for metal-intensive CV, tractor, forging and component chains.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states facing weaker revenue expectations may slow payments, local schemes or contractor spending, potentially softening rural liquidity and credit demand in affected regions such as Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CREDITACC","SPANDANA","UJJIVANSFB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regional and fiscal-transmission risk; not a direct balance-sheet hit from the Bill.","sector":"State-Focused NBFCs \u0026 Microfinance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"With retrospective levy overhang reduced, miners may have greater certainty to maintain or expand extraction plans, supporting demand for industrial explosives, blasting services, mine development and contract mining.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SOLARINDS","GOCLCORP","GMDCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most sensitive to actual mine production growth and tender activity after policy clarity.","sector":"Explosives \u0026 Mining Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
11 Aug, 04:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
Government introduces the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026 barring states from levying their own taxes on mining and expanding central control over mineral-bearing land
A new Bill would stop state governments charging their own extra taxes on mining, which makes digging up iron ore, coal and manganese cheaper and more predictable for miners, while state governments lose a source of revenue.
Who it hits first
- Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, copper and lignite stop facing state-specific cesses on top of central royalty, so the cost per tonne becomes predictable again.
- The retrospective-demand risk created by the Supreme Court ruling is capped, removing a contingent liability that had been sitting over the sector.
- State governments in Odisha, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Gujarat lose a revenue tool, and state-owned miners like GMDC sit awkwardly on both sides.
Who may gain
- Steel makers with captive iron ore and coal mines, such as Jindal Steel & Power, get cheaper internal raw material.
- Pure-play miners with clean balance sheets - Hindustan Copper and MOIL, both effectively debt-free - keep more of the saving.
- New bidders for mineral blocks gain cost certainty, which is what the Bill is explicitly designed to encourage.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and thermal power stations downstream of the mines get more predictable input costs; those with captive mines capture the saving directly, while merchant buyers only benefit if miners pass it through. Cement makers gain limestone-levy certainty and thermal generators gain better visibility on delivered coal cost, which feeds into tariff filings.
Upstream
Mining equipment makers, explosives suppliers and mine-development contractors upstream of the miners gain, because predictable levies revive stalled block development and auction participation. State governments, which sit upstream as the levying authority, lose the revenue and may litigate, which is the main risk to the whole chain.
Where demand moves
Business
No new demand for minerals is created - the same tonnes get mined - but the cost of mining each tonne falls and becomes predictable, which makes marginal blocks economic and should bring more auction bids over time. Downstream, steel makers with captive mines see the saving inside their own cost line, while merchant ore buyers see it only if miners choose to pass it on rather than keep it.
Capital
Money rotates within Metals & Mining toward companies that actually own and operate mines and can bank the saving - Hindustan Copper, MOIL, Jindal Steel & Power - and away from downstream converters and traders like Arfin India and SG Mart, whose benefit is second-hand. Investors will also reprice the contingent-liability discount that had been applied to miners exposed to retrospective state demands.
How it spreads across sectors
Construction Materials
Limestone levy certainty helps cement makers plan captive-mine economics.
Metals & Mining
Lower and more predictable landed ore cost; the retrospective-demand overhang is capped.
Power
Coal cost visibility improves for thermal generators, feeding into more stable tariff filings.
codex additions
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- State mining levies capped
- Cost per tonne of ore falls and becomes predictable
- Captive-mine steel makers widen margins
- Mineral block auctions attract more bidders
- Mining equipment and explosives order books rise
Pattern name
Govt Capex Cascade
Sectors queried
- Metals & Mining
- Power
- Construction Materials
When it plays out
Immediate
Mining and captive-mine steel names open firm; state-owned miners whose owners lose revenue, like GMDC, trade mixed.
Medium term
If the Bill becomes law and survives challenge, expect stronger participation in mineral block auctions and a structural narrowing of the risk discount applied to Indian mining assets.
Short term
Watch the Bill's passage through both Houses and whether mineral-bearing states challenge it - a constitutional challenge would reinstate the uncertainty the Bill removes.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty on iron ore, manganese and other mineral levies improves raw-material cost visibility for steel and alloy producers, especially firms buying ore from merchant miners or bidding for mines.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JSWSTEEL","JINDALSTEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Already adjacent to mining, but the separate downstream steel margin effect is worth tracking.","sector":"Steel \u0026 Alloy Producers","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"More commercially attractive mining projects and clearer central control over mineral-bearing land can revive mine expansion, equipment orders, crushing systems, conveyors and heavy earthmoving demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BEML","LT","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book impact is likely lagged rather than immediate.","sector":"Mining Equipment \u0026 Capital Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher mineral output and new mine auctions increase bulk movement of coal, iron ore, bauxite and limestone through rail corridors, ports and inland logistics networks.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefits depend on actual volume growth, not just lower tax uncertainty.","sector":"Logistics, Rail Freight \u0026 Ports","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower mineral and metal cost uncertainty can reduce input-cost volatility for roads, bridges, urban infrastructure and industrial projects while supporting faster mine-linked capex.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","KNRCON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect benefit through steel, cement and project execution economics.","sector":"Infrastructure EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced retrospective levy risk improves cash-flow visibility for miners and metal companies, lowering credit-risk perception and making mining-linked capex easier to finance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","BANKBARODA","CANBK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant for lenders with PSU, infrastructure and commodity-sector exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Project Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower and more predictable steel, aluminium and battery-mineral input costs can support margins for vehicle makers and component suppliers if commodity prices soften.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Transmission is indirect and may be offset by global metal prices.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Greater central control and improved mining economics can support domestic availability of copper, aluminium, zinc and critical minerals used in cables, transmission equipment and renewable infrastructure.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["POLYCAB","KEI","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More structural than immediate; depends on mineral-specific auction and production follow-through.","sector":"Electrical Equipment, Cables \u0026 Renewables Supply Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral levy caps reduce volatility in cement, steel and aggregates, construction cost inflation pressure can ease for developers and building-product firms.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and diluted by land, financing and demand factors.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Clearer rules for mineral-bearing land and lower levy risk may improve economics for domestic mining or processing of mineral inputs such as rock phosphate, limestone and other industrial minerals used in agri-input value chains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["COROMANDEL","CHAMBLFERT","GNFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"India still relies heavily on imported fertilizer minerals, so the link is defensible but limited.","sector":"Fertilizers \u0026 Agri Inputs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2024-256 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.