Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limited
NSE: FACTFertilizers
Share price
₹717.75
-3.91% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
34
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹46,438 Cr
P/E ratio
—
P/B ratio
34.3
ROCE
4.0%
ROE
-2.9%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Our sales figures for this company step up at Jun 2008 and we hold nothing that says why, so we cannot honestly quote a growth rate across it.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
Our sales figures for this company step up at Jun 2008 and we hold nothing that says why, so there is no honest growth rate of its own to set against its sector.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
It has no earnings, so there is no price-to-earnings to compare.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
It has no earnings to weigh the price against.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limited — this one | -63%/yr | — | — |
| Coromandel International Limited | -1%/yr | 26.9× | — |
| Paradeep Phosphates Limited | 48%/yr | 14.4× | ₹0.30 |
| Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited | 24%/yr | 7.9× | ₹0.33 |
| Madhya Bharat Agro Products Limited | 6%/yr | 46.4× | ₹7.7 |
| Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited | -19%/yr | 8.5× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Fertilizers), it ranks 19 of 20 on returns, 12 of 19 on growth, 18 of 20 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 4.0% on capital, ahead of 5% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹214 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹563 crore on plant and equipment, ₹349 crore more than it made, paid from its own cash and investments. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 96 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being paid 159 days before it paid its own suppliers to paid 123 days before it paid its own suppliers.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
6 of 9 checks clear · 67%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue rose 20%, but net profit swung to a Rs 61.94 Cr loss.
Announced 14 Aug 2026 · Standalone · Unaudited
Revenue
₹1,253 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+20.2%
Net profit
-₹62 Cr
Profit vs last year
-1648.5%
Net margin
-4.9%
EPS
₹-0.96
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹46,438 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹717.75
- 52w High
- ₹1,059
- 52w Low
- ₹652
- Enterprise value
- ₹47,648 Cr
- Beta
- 1.5
- Price CAGR 1y
- -16.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 13.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 41.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 41.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- -0.7%
- PEG ratio
- —
- P/E ratio
- —
- P/B ratio
- 34.3
- EV / EBITDA
- 730.8
- Industry P/E
- 10.1
- ROCE
- 4.0%
- ROCE 5y average
- 18.2%
- ROE
- -2.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 3.0
- Interest coverage
- 0.8
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 8.0%
- ROE last year
- -3.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹5,724 Cr
- Annual profit
- -₹40 Cr
- Operating margin
- 1.2%
- Net profit margin
- -0.7%
- EBITDA margin
- 1.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- -2.6%
- Sales growth 5y
- 11.9%
- Profit growth 3y
- -63.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 45.0%
- EPS
- ₹-0.6
- Sales growth TTM
- 32.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -231.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹1,253 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- -₹62 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 20.2%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- -1650.0%
- OPM latest quarter
- -2.4%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹20.9
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹3,985 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹1,671 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹3,985 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 1.1
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- -₹996 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹1,106 Cr
- FCF yield
- -2.9%
- Net cash flow
- -₹49 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 90.0%
- FII holding
- 0.2%
- DII holding
- 0.1%
- Public holding
- 0.8%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coromandel Inter | 1,745.50 | 27.6 | 51,495 | 0.63 | 381.6 | -24.6 | 8,164.8 | 15.9 | 22.1 |
| F A C T | 746.95 | 48,333 | 0.00 | -61.9 | -1547.2 | 1,253.4 | 20.2 | 4.0 | |
| Paradeep Phosph. | 155.38 | 14.8 | 16,137 | 0.97 | 392.5 | 18.8 | 6,124.3 | 36.0 | 15.3 |
| Chambal Fert. | 396.35 | 8.2 | 15,880 | 2.78 | 523.6 | -4.6 | 5,027.0 | -11.8 | 25.2 |
| M B Agro Prod. | 168.02 | 49.8 | 7,710 | 0.06 | 33.0 | 16.8 | 416.3 | 1.6 | 19.3 |
| G S F C | 149.73 | 8.6 | 5,966 | 3.34 | 158.5 | 14.4 | 3,583.2 | 64.0 | 7.2 |
| R C F | 107.58 | 14.3 | 5,935 | 2.18 | 73.5 | 35.1 | 3,585.7 | 6.4 | 10.4 |
| Median | 115.17 | 13.5 | 1,284 | 0.10 | 34.6 | 6.4 | 615.2 | 18.1 | 15.3 |
Competes with: Agro Phos India Limited, Aries Agro Limited, Bohra Industries Limited, Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited, Coromandel International Limited, Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited, Khaitan Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited, Kothari Industrial Corporation Limited, Krishana Phoschem Limited, Madhya Bharat Agro Products Limited, Madras Fertilizers Limited, Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited, National Fertilizers Limited, Nova Agritech Limited, Paradeep Phosphates Limited, Rama Phosphates Limited, Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited, Shiva Global Agro Industries Limited, Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Limited, Zuari Agro Chemicals Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,233 | 1,663 | 1,097 | 1,058 | 600 | 1,449 | 949 | 1,053 | 1,043 | 1,629 | 1,568 | 1,484 | 1,253 |
| Expenses | 1,086 | 1,531 | 1,054 | 1,023 | 656 | 1,414 | 918 | 968 | 1,019 | 1,590 | 1,611 | 1,435 | 1,283 |
| Material Cost | 706 | 602 | 832 | 1,015 | 993 | 861 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -19 | -176 | 13 | -148 | 131 | -368 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | -16 | 331 | 434 | 424 | 3.01 | 509 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 54 | 74 | 82 | 69 | 74 | 76 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 245 | 187 | 230 | 250 | 234 | 205 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 147 | 132 | 43 | 36 | -57 | 35 | 32 | 85 | 24 | 39 | -43 | 49 | -30 |
| OPM % | 12 | 7.96 | 3.92 | 3.50 | -9.44 | 2.42 | 3.32 | 8.05 | 2.30 | 2.42 | -2.73 | 3.30 | -2.40 |
| Other Income | -7 | 39 | 54 | -129 | 60 | 48 | 57 | 76 | 52 | 51 | 39 | 34 | 34 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 63 | 61 | 62 | 61 | 62 | 61 | 62 | 60 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 64 | 62 |
| Depreciation | 5 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 7 |
| Profit before tax | 72 | 105 | 30 | -166 | -64 | 15 | 15 | 88 | 7 | 21 | -74 | 6 | -64 |
| Tax % | 0 | 0 | 0 | -52 | -24 | 28 | 46 | 20 | 40 | 2 | -8 | 46 | -4 |
| Net Profit | 72 | 105 | 30 | -79 | -49 | 11 | 8 | 71 | 4 | 21 | -68 | 3 | -62 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.11 | 1.63 | 0.47 | -1.22 | -0.75 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 1.09 | 0.07 | 0.32 | -1.05 | 0.05 | -0.96 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 1.09 | 0.07 | 0.32 | -1.05 | 0.05 | -0.96 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,979 | 1,736 | 1,867 | 1,927 | 1,955 | 2,770 | 3,259 | 4,425 | 6,198 | 5,051 | 4,051 | 5,724 | 5,934 |
| Expenses | 2,157 | 1,959 | 1,821 | 1,759 | 1,945 | 2,491 | 2,708 | 3,829 | 5,443 | 4,693 | 3,956 | 5,655 | 5,919 |
| Material Cost | 2,260 | 3,442 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 137 | -180 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 478 | 1,192 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 275 | 299 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 808 | 900 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | -178 | -223 | 45 | 168 | 10 | 279 | 551 | 596 | 755 | 358 | 95 | 69 | 15 |
| OPM % | -9 | -13 | 2.40 | 9 | 0.50 | 10 | 17 | 13 | 12 | 7 | 2.30 | 1.20 | 0.30 |
| Other Income | -6 | 41 | 18 | 42 | 457 | 1,004 | 68 | 22 | 136 | -42 | 241 | 176 | 159 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 25 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 196 | 252 | 305 | 321 | 281 | 289 | 245 | 244 | 248 | 247 | 246 | 250 | 250 |
| Depreciation | 20 | 18 | 21 | 17 | 23 | 18 | 23 | 27 | 30 | 27 | 37 | 36 | 35 |
| Profit before tax | -400 | -452 | -263 | -129 | 163 | 976 | 350 | 346 | 613 | 42 | 54 | -40 | -111 |
| Tax % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -206 | 23 | -1 | |
| Net Profit | -400 | -452 | -263 | -129 | 163 | 976 | 350 | 346 | 613 | 128 | 41 | -40 | -106 |
| EPS in Rs | -6.18 | -6.99 | -4.06 | -1.99 | 2.51 | 15 | 5.42 | 5.35 | 9.47 | 1.98 | 0.64 | -0.61 | -1.64 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.64 | 0.61 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 49 | 61 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 13%
- 5 years
- 12%
- 3 years
- -3%
- TTM
- 32%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 7%
- 5 years
- 45%
- 3 years
- -63%
- TTM
- -231%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 41%
- 5 years
- 41%
- 3 years
- 13%
- 1 year
- -16%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 26%
- 3 years
- 8%
- Last year
- -3%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 | 647 |
| Reserves | -1,504 | -1,956 | -2,159 | -2,286 | -2,119 | -1,139 | -827 | 15 | 627 | 711 | 724 | 703 |
| Borrowings | 1,074 | 1,811 | 2,402 | 2,278 | 2,274 | 1,821 | 1,822 | 1,838 | 1,842 | 1,810 | 3,717 | 3,985 |
| Other Liabilities | 1,449 | 1,167 | 715 | 1,215 | 1,547 | 1,317 | 1,756 | 2,276 | 2,379 | 2,682 | 948 | 681 |
| Total Liabilities | 1,667 | 1,668 | 1,605 | 1,854 | 2,348 | 2,646 | 3,399 | 4,775 | 5,494 | 5,850 | 6,036 | 6,017 |
| Fixed Assets | 282 | 270 | 297 | 295 | 296 | 258 | 286 | 816 | 814 | 827 | 951 | 949 |
| CWIP | 25 | 22 | 25 | 18 | 18 | 39 | 55 | 43 | 105 | 224 | 216 | 294 |
| Investments | 4 | 4 | 46 | 59 | 69 | 78 | 86 | 98 | 113 | 130 | 158 | 185 |
| Other Assets | 1,357 | 1,373 | 1,238 | 1,482 | 1,966 | 2,271 | 2,972 | 3,819 | 4,463 | 4,669 | 4,710 | 4,589 |
| Total Assets | 1,667 | 1,668 | 1,605 | 1,854 | 2,348 | 2,646 | 3,399 | 4,775 | 5,494 | 5,850 | 6,036 | 6,017 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 192 | -206 | 31 | 224 | -410 | 214 | 1,021 | 152 | 638 | 280 | 140 | -996 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -9 | -3 | 75 | -3 | 416 | 336 | -854 | -157 | -765 | 213 | -282 | 952 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -180 | 224 | -94 | -207 | -45 | -508 | -36 | 8 | -5 | -107 | -75 | -6 |
| Net Cash Flow | 3 | 15 | 12 | 14 | -40 | 42 | 130 | 3 | -132 | 386 | -217 | -49 |
| Free Cash Flow | 183 | -209 | 24 | 215 | 0 | 1,144 | 988 | 88 | 556 | 126 | -13 | -1,106 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 2 | 1 | 99 | 69 | 76 | 51 | 12 | 14 | 28 | 11 | 26 | 22 |
| Inventory Days | 146 | 123 | 158 | 184 | 197 | 138 | 112 | 93 | 103 | 134 | 128 | 106 |
| Days Payable | 180 | 166 | 109 | 150 | 120 | 49 | 76 | 77 | 37 | 54 | 60 | 20 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | -32 | -41 | 148 | 102 | 152 | 141 | 47 | 30 | 94 | 91 | 94 | 109 |
| Working Capital Days | -157 | 26 | -1 | -20 | 13 | -60 | -228 | -159 | -120 | -175 | -239 | -123 |
| ROCE % | -41 | -61 | 6 | 25 | 1 | 27 | 40 | 33 | 30 | 17 | 7 | 4 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
3,86,23,482inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- Agro Phos India Limited
- Aries Agro Limited
- Bohra Industries Limited
- Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
- Coromandel International Limited
- Gujarat State Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited
- Khaitan Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited
- Kothari Industrial Corporation Limited
- Krishana Phoschem Limited
- Madhya Bharat Agro Products Limited
- Madras Fertilizers Limited
- Nagarjuna Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited
- National Fertilizers Limited
- Nova Agritech Limited
- Paradeep Phosphates Limited
- Rama Phosphates Limited
- Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited
- Shiva Global Agro Industries Limited
- Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Limited
- Zuari Agro Chemicals Limited
Uses as raw material
- ammonia
- benzene
- muriate of potash (MOP)
- phosphoric acid
- rock phosphate
- sulphur
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Chemicals
- Industry
- Fertilizers
- Classification
- Chemicals › Fertilizers
- ISIN
- INE188A01015
Business segments
- Fertiliser · 100%
- Petrochemical · 0%
Plants
- Cochin Division · Ambalamedu, Kochi, Kerala
- Udyogamandal Complex - Caprolactam/Petrochemical Plants
- Udyogamandal Complex - Fertiliser Plants · Kochi/Eloor-Udyogamandal, Kerala
- Willingdon Island raw-material installation · Kochi, Kerala
News impact
Big market events that reach Fertilizers and Chemicals Travancore Limited, and how the effect spreads.
23 Sept, 07:38 IST · Market event · medium impact
India starts anti-dumping probe into Chinese Glycine imports
India is probing cheap Chinese glycine imports, which could help home chemical makers later but may raise costs for food, drug and farm buyers if an import tax follows.
Who it hits first
- India's trade investigator (DGTR, the body that checks unfair imports) opened a probe into cheap glycine, a simple chemical used in food, drugs and farm sprays, arriving from China.
- If the probe finds harm to local makers, India can add an import tax (anti-dumping duty) that makes Chinese glycine costlier and helps home producers sell more.
- No listed glycine maker is named in the evidence, so any stock lift today is hope of future protection, while buyers of glycine could later pay more.
Who may gain
- Indian glycine and nearby specialty makers, if a duty lifts local prices (no single listed maker confirmed in the pack)
- Farm-chemical sellers such as PI Industries and GSP Crop, if protection spreads to agro inputs
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Indian food, drug and farm-spray makers that buy glycine could face higher input costs if cheap Chinese supply is taxed.
Upstream
Chinese glycine exporters face the probe; if a duty follows, their shipments to India shrink.
Where demand moves
Business
No extra orders yet — the probe only starts the case; real business gain comes months later if a duty curbs Chinese supply and buyers switch to home makers.
Capital
No fresh funds flow; investors may bid up chemical shares on protection hopes, but cash gains arrive only if duties lift prices and profits.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Small positive mood for home makers on protection hopes; real gains only if a duty lands.
Pharma
Mild cost worry since glycine feeds drugs; dearer supply would squeeze pill makers later.
Textiles
Negligible near-term link; fibre makers watch only for broader China-duty mood.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- DGTR probes Chinese glycine dumping → possible import duty
- Duty curbs cheap imports → domestic glycine prices firm
- Chemical makers gain share → pharma and textile buyers face higher costs
Pattern name
China Cascade
Patterns
- China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Pharma
- Textiles
When it plays out
Immediate
1–7 days: chemical shares drift on protection hopes with no order change.
Medium term
1–6 months: probe findings decide any duty; only then do prices, orders and margins move.
Short term
1–4 weeks: filings and hearing news set expectations; buyers watch for price hints.
1 Sept, 04:32 IST · Market event · high impact
August monsoon ends 16% deficient in India's hottest August since 1901 and the IMD sees September rainfall below 91% of normal as the kharif sowing window closes with lower acreage
India got 16% less rain than normal in August and September is expected to be dry too, so farmers planted less. That means weaker farm incomes and fewer sales for fertiliser, pesticide and rural consumer companies, and less water for hydro dams - which pushes more electricity generation onto coal plants like NTPC.
Who it hits first
- Fertiliser makers FACT, Coromandel and Chambal Fertilisers lose back-half season volumes as farmers cut application on smaller planted area.
- Bayer CropScience loses its crop protection spray window, because pests and fungal disease need moisture to appear.
- NHPC generates fewer units as reservoir inflows fall, with almost no variable cost to save in return.
- Marico and Dabur, the two most rural-exposed packaged-goods companies, see volume growth slow as farm incomes fall.
Who may gain
- NTPC and other coal-fired generators pick up the dispatch that hydro cannot supply, and a hot dry September raises air-conditioning demand at the same time.
- Sugar mills including Balrampur Chini rose up to 11% in the session as the government released 13 lakh tonnes for September sale, showing the policy channel currently outweighs the acreage channel.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
The farmer is the downstream customer for fertiliser and crop protection, and a smaller planted area means a smaller order. Further down, weaker harvests raise food prices for packaged-goods makers who buy agricultural inputs, and lower farm incomes reduce what rural households can spend on hair oil, ayurvedic products, two-wheelers and tractors.
Upstream
Fertiliser and agrochemical makers cut their own purchasing when farm demand falls - urea and phosphate feedstock imports, packaging and rural distribution logistics all see lower order books. Chambal Fertilisers also consumes water directly in urea production, so a drought squeezes its own manufacturing input, not just its customers' wallets.
Where demand moves
Business
Demand is destroyed rather than displaced - a field that was never sown never needs fertiliser or pesticide, and there is no competitor who picks that order up. The one genuine transfer is in electricity: the megawatt-hours hydro cannot generate must still be produced, so they flow to coal-fired generators, with NTPC the largest recipient.
Capital
Money exits rural-facing names - fertiliser, agrochemical, rural packaged goods, tractors and two-wheelers - and rotates into thermal power, which is the direct beneficiary, and into urban-facing consumption where farm incomes are irrelevant. Because a bad monsoon also raises food inflation, some money also rotates defensively out of consumer discretionary altogether.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Tractor and two-wheeler demand, which tracks farm income closely, softens.
Chemicals
Fertiliser and agrochemical volumes fall for the rest of the season.
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Rural volume growth slows while agricultural input costs rise - a squeeze from both ends.
Power
Hydro generation falls and thermal utilisation rises to fill the gap.
codex additions
Commodity angle
Basis
Fired on the demand-shock limb of the Layer 6.2 rule: a rainfall deficit is a water-availability shock even though no traded price moved on this news. Two affected companies carry explicit DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edges to the water node - NHPC (producer-side, so less water is negative for it) and Chambal Fertilisers (consumer-side, water used in urea production). Margin impact in basis points is NOT computed for either, because neither edge carries a cost_weight_pct, and the stored water price is a US irrigation index that is not a valid proxy for Indian monsoon rainfall. Quantifying it from that series would be fabrication.
Commodity
water
Price as of
2026-08-31T12:13:43Z
Shock type
demand
Unit
USD/acre-foot
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- August rainfall -16%, September forecast below 91% of normal
- Kharif acreage down for paddy, sugarcane and oilseeds
- Fertiliser and agrochemical volumes fall
- Farm incomes fall, rural consumption slows
- Reservoir inflows fall, hydro generation drops
- Thermal dispatch rises to fill the gap
- Food inflation builds into winter
Pattern name
Monsoon Cascade
Sectors queried
- Fast Moving Consumer Goods
- Chemicals
- Automobile and Auto Components
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
Rural-facing and fertiliser names open weaker; thermal generators firm up.
Medium term
If the deficit holds, expect food inflation to build into the winter, which in turn makes it harder for the RBI to cut rates - compounding the rate-sensitive pressure described in the concurrent bond yield event in this same scan.
Short term
Watch actual September rainfall against the below-91% forecast, and watch reservoir storage levels. The 2023 precedent shows that if the rain arrives after all, the same names rebound 1-7% within a month.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Weak monsoon -\u003e lower farm output and rural cash flows -\u003e higher agri/tractor/two-wheeler loan stress and softer rural credit demand","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["SBIN","M\u0026MFIN","CHOLAFIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is stronger for lenders with higher rural, agri, vehicle-finance or microfinance exposure. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Banks and Rural-Focused NBFCs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Crop-income shock -\u003e weaker repayment capacity for rural borrower groups -\u003e collection pressure and possible credit-cost rise","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CREDITACC","SPANDANA","BANDHANBNK"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Stress may appear with a lag after harvest-income disappointment rather than immediately. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Microfinance Institutions","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rainfall deficit -\u003e higher need for groundwater extraction, micro-irrigation, pipes and farm pumps -\u003e demand support from farmers and government schemes","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["KSB","KIRLOSBROS","JISLJALEQS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit depends on farmer affordability and state-level subsidy execution. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Irrigation, Pumps and Water Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower sugarcane acreage and moisture stress -\u003e cane yield risk -\u003e tighter sugar supply, possible policy curbs, and volatility in ethanol feedstock availability","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","EIDPARRY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Sugar prices can benefit, but volume loss and government intervention can cap upside. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Sugar and Ethanol","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower paddy acreage and food-inflation risk -\u003e tighter domestic grain balance -\u003e export restrictions or higher procurement controls -\u003e margin and volume pressure","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["LTFOODS","KRBL","KOHINOOR"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Policy risk is central because food security often takes priority over export realization. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Rice and Agri Commodity Exporters","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower oilseed acreage -\u003e higher import dependence and raw-material cost pressure -\u003e margin squeeze for processors unless price hikes pass through","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ADANIWILMAR","PATANJALI","GODREJAGRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Companies with stronger brands may pass through costs better than commodity processors. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Edible Oil and Food Processing","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Weak monsoon and heat stress -\u003e cotton yield/quality risk and rural wage pressure -\u003e higher input costs for spinners and fabric makers","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["VTL","TRIDENT","WELSPUNLIV"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on cotton geography, inventory coverage and export demand. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Textiles and Apparel","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Hotter weather supports cooling-product demand, but weak rural incomes reduce discretionary purchases -\u003e divergent impact across AC-focused and rural-facing categories","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","CROMPTON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Near-term heat can help cooling sales, while broader rural demand weakness is a drag. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Consumer Durables and Appliances","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Weak farm incomes -\u003e slower rural housing, repairs and small construction -\u003e softer cement, pipes and building-material demand in rural markets","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","RAMCOCEM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Government infrastructure spending may offset part of the rural private-demand weakness. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Cement and Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
26 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · high impact
Fertiliser shares rally up to 14% after Russia assures India of uninterrupted urea and complex fertiliser supply
Russia promised India it will keep sending fertiliser despite US sanctions pressure, so fertiliser makers jumped up to 14% - but every similar supply-relief announcement this year has faded within a month.
Who it hits first
- Urea and complex fertiliser makers get certainty that imported raw material will keep arriving before rabi sowing: FACT, RCF, NFL, Chambal Fertilisers, Coromandel, GSFC
- The risk that was removed was a physical supply break, not a price change - subsidy-capped state makers see their output protected but not their margin
Who may gain
- Farmers, who avoid a urea shortage in the October-to-March rabi season
- Coromandel and Chambal, the two private makers whose margin is not capped by the subsidy formula
- Rural-facing businesses - tractor makers, two-wheeler makers and rural lenders - if a normal rabi crop follows
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Farmers get assured urea and DAP availability for the rabi sowing season starting October, which protects wheat and mustard acreage. That in turn protects the demand that flows to seed companies, crop-protection makers, tractor and two-wheeler dealers and rural lenders through the winter.
Upstream
Russian urea and phosphate exporters keep their India volumes, and the shipping and port handling chain serving that trade keeps its cargo. Indian importers avoid having to scramble for costlier alternative cargoes from West Asia, which had been disrupted by the Hormuz situation earlier this year.
Where demand moves
Business
This removes a threatened supply cut rather than creating new demand. Fertiliser volumes were always going to be sold - the question was whether the raw material would arrive. With that answered, Indian plants keep running at plan and the import trade with Russia continues. The genuinely new demand is one step downstream: farmers who were holding back sowing plans on input uncertainty can now commit, which supports seed, crop-protection and farm-equipment orders into the rabi season.
Capital
Money rushed into the whole fertiliser pocket on the headline, pushing shares up as much as 14% in a single session regardless of individual company quality - FACT, which earns 1.60% on equity, rose alongside Coromandel, which earns 16.41%. The measured record says that indiscriminate flow reverses within a month, rotating back out of the subsidy-capped state names and, at best, staying in the two private makers.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Tractor and two-wheeler demand is rural-led and benefits from an uninterrupted sowing season
Chemicals
Fertiliser makers rerate on the headline, though state-owned names stay subsidy-capped
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
A normal rabi crop supports rural incomes and staples demand into the winter
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
The 14% move has already happened. Over the next week the risk is give-back rather than continuation, since the news is now in the price.
Medium term
Over one to six months the real driver is the rabi sowing data from October onwards and the FY27 subsidy allocation in the Budget. If sowing is normal, the rural demand chain - tractors, two-wheelers, staples - benefits more durably than the fertiliser makers themselves.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch whether Russian cargoes actually arrive and whether US sanctions enforcement touches the payment channel. All four comparable events this year faded within this window.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Assured fertiliser availability reduces rabi sowing risk -\u003e farmers are more willing to invest in pumps, tillers, irrigation equipment and replacement farm machinery -\u003e order visibility improves for agri-equipment suppliers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ESCORTS","VSTTILLERS","SHAKTIPUMP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Effect depends on monsoon reservoir levels and crop price expectations.","sector":"Capital Goods - Farm Equipment and Irrigation","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower input-shortage risk -\u003e better crop-cycle confidence -\u003e higher demand for crop loans, tractor/equipment finance and rural working-capital credit -\u003e lower perceived stress in agri-linked lending books.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","M\u0026MFIN","CHOLAFIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive is stronger for lenders with high rural or semi-urban exposure.","sector":"Financial Services - Rural and Agri Credit","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stable fertiliser supply supports sowing and farm income expectations -\u003e rural households defer fewer purchases -\u003e apparel, value retail and small-ticket discretionary demand sentiment improves.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VMART","V2RETAIL","DMART"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order demand effect and will need actual crop realization to sustain.","sector":"Retailing - Rural Discretionary Consumption","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Assured fertiliser availability supports cane nutrition and yield expectations -\u003e steadier sugarcane supply for mills -\u003e better operating leverage and ethanol feedstock visibility.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","EIDPARRY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant if key cane-growing regions also have adequate rainfall and water availability.","sector":"Sugar and Ethanol","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Fertiliser supply continuity reduces risk to cotton output -\u003e improved raw cotton availability and potentially softer cotton prices -\u003e margin relief for yarn, fabric and home-textile producers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VARDHACRLC","ARVIND","WELSPUNLIV"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is clearer for cotton-consuming textile firms than for upstream cotton-linked traders.","sector":"Textiles","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Uninterrupted fertiliser imports and domestic distribution -\u003e higher rail, port, warehousing and last-mile movement of fertilisers into rabi season -\u003e volume support for logistics operators.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","TCI","GATI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is volume-led, but fertiliser logistics is only one part of these companies' business mix.","sector":"Logistics and Warehousing","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower risk of fertiliser shortage -\u003e better crop-output visibility for grains, pulses and oilseeds -\u003e improved sourcing confidence for processors and agri-commodity companies.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LTFOODS","KRBL","AWL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Margin impact can be mixed if higher output lowers procurement cost but also pressures inventory values.","sector":"Food Processing and Agri Commodities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Russian fertiliser supply assurance reduces fear of emergency domestic production ramp-ups or costly spot LNG dependency for fertiliser plants -\u003e stabilizes gas-linked input planning and energy procurement assumptions.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["GAIL","PETRONET","ONGC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive for macro input-cost stability, but potentially negative for any expectation of incremental domestic gas demand from fertiliser producers.","sector":"Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
16 Jul, 04:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
Cabinet approves new investment policy for Urea — 8 new units to add 10 MT capacity
Who it hits first
- Domestic urea producers — CHAMBLFERT, RCF, NFL, FACT, GNFC — gain from policy support for ~10 MT of new capacity across 8 units.
Who may gain
- Urea makers via volume/capex visibility and lower import dependence; NPK/complex players (COROMANDEL, DEEPAKFERT) benefit indirectly via sector sentiment.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Farmers and the agri-input distribution chain gain from more assured, import-independent domestic urea availability.
Upstream
More urea capacity raises structural demand for natural gas/LNG feedstock (producers' key input) and plant/EPC equipment for the 8 new units.
Where demand moves
Business
New policy-backed urea units add domestic supply, substituting imports and giving producers volume growth; because urea MRP is administered, the gain accrues via throughput and subsidy-supported economics rather than price.
Capital
Modest rotation into cheap, cash-generative fertiliser names (CHAMBLFERT, GNFC) on improved capex/volume visibility; weak-balance-sheet PSUs (FACT) are value-trap risks despite the tailwind.
How it spreads across sectors
Agriculture
improved input security
Fertilizers
volume/capex tailwind, margins policy-capped
Oil & Gas
higher long-run gas/LNG feedstock demand
Commodity angle
Commodity
Urea
Note
New urea investment policy adds ~10 MT domestic capacity via 8 units. Urea MRP is administered/subsidised (NBS + fixed retail price), so producer realisations are policy-set, not market-priced — margin_impact_bps=0. Fertiliser producers have DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY->Natural gas (input) edges but this event is a capacity-investment policy, not a gas price/demand shock. Upside is volume/capex-led.
Price updated at
2026-04-26 (stale >7d — using policy context, not price)
Shock type
supply_capacity_policy
When it plays out
Immediate
Mild positive for urea producers on policy clarity
Medium term
Capacity comes online over years; import substitution and gas-feedstock demand build gradually
Short term
Attention on which players win new-unit allocations
23 Jun, 04:40 IST · Market event · critical impact
Tamil Nadu ammonia leak kills seven and hospitalises 68
Who it hits first
- Fatal ammonia leak creates immediate shutdown, investigation, remediation and regulatory-enforcement risk for the Tamil Nadu facility involved.
- No affected company is identified, so listed fertiliser and chemical tickers face sector-wide sentiment and compliance-cost risk rather than confirmed direct operational exposure.
- Seven deaths and 68 hospitalisations materially increase legal, compensation and reputational risk around ammonia handling.
Who may gain
- Industrial safety-equipment, gas-detection, plant-audit and environmental-compliance providers may receive additional demand.
- Fertiliser producers without exposure to the affected facility may gain temporary volumes if a shutdown constrains regional supply.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Fertiliser distributors and agricultural customers may face local dispatch delays, but unaffected producers can substitute supply if the shutdown remains contained.
Upstream
Reduced operation at the affected ammonia-linked facility can temporarily lower demand for natural gas and other feedstocks, while inspections disrupt tanker, storage and handling activity.
Where demand moves
Business
A shutdown can redirect fertiliser and chemical orders to unaffected producers, while mandatory inspections may temporarily defer ammonia-linked production and procurement.
Capital
Capital is likely to rotate toward operators with stronger balance sheets and operating returns, while highly leveraged, loss-making or richly valued chemical companies face greater de-rating risk.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Negative safety-risk premium, possible inspections and higher compliance spending across hazardous-gas facilities.
Fertilisers
Mixed impact: shutdown risk for the affected operator, but possible volume transfer and firmer local supply conditions for unaffected producers.
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Natural gas
Shock type
demand
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Fatal ammonia leak triggers shutdown and investigation
- Hazardous-gas facilities face inspections and compliance spending
- Ammonia-linked production and natural-gas demand may decline locally
- Orders can shift toward unaffected fertiliser producers
- Higher safety capex and liability risk pressure sector valuations
Pattern name
Industrial Ammonia Safety Cascade
Sectors queried
- Chemicals
- Fertilisers
When it plays out
Immediate
Emergency response, plant isolation, casualty assessment, investigation and potential shutdown dominate price discovery.
Medium term
One to six months may bring higher safety capex, insurance costs and operating procedures, with the final impact dependent on shutdown duration and liability findings.
Short term
Regulatory inspections, compensation provisions, operating-permit reviews and order diversion may affect sector sentiment over one to four weeks.
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 19 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹0.39 |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Sep 2024 | unspecified | ₹0.97 |
| 22 Sep 2023 | unspecified | ₹1 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2024-252 Sep 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.