Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited
NSE: DEEPAKFERTCommodity Chemicals
Share price
₹1,390.20
-1.78% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
56
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹17,517 Cr
P/E ratio
17.8
P/B ratio
2.6
ROCE
11.4%
ROE
10.9%
Dividend yield
0.7%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 13.6% over the past year, and 15.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 19.8% to 16.4% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 15.0% a year against a sector median of 10.2% — 4.9 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 17.8× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 20.7×, across 4 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 14.5×, the 68th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited — this one | -16%/yr | 17.8× | — |
| SRF Limited | -4%/yr | 32.9× | — |
| Tata Chemicals Limited | -51%/yr | — | — |
| Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited | -18%/yr | 8.5× | — |
| Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited | — | 66.0× | — |
| GHCL Limited | -25%/yr | 7.5× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Commodity Chemicals), it ranks 17 of 30 on returns, 4 of 27 on growth, 12 of 30 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 11.4% on capital, ahead of 43% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹4522 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹5733 crore on plant and equipment, ₹1211 crore more than it made; the gap was mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹2656 crore to ₹5670 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 159 arrived as cash — well above the profit; depreciation and interest are the reason, not a windfall. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being paid 18 days before it paid its own suppliers to waiting 30 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
8 of 9 checks clear · 89%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Profit doubled to INR490 crore with both new plants over 90% built
Announced 30 Jul 2026 · Consolidated
Revenue
₹3,256 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+22.5%
Revenue vs last quarter
+8.1%
Net profit
₹490 Cr
Profit vs last year
+100.8%
Profit vs last quarter
+252.5%
Net margin
15.0%
EPS
₹38.82
Earnings call transcript · 31 Jul 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹17,517 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹1,390.20
- 52w High
- ₹1,681
- 52w Low
- ₹866
- Enterprise value
- ₹22,689 Cr
- Beta
- 1.4
- Price CAGR 1y
- -8.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 31.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 27.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 21.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 4.5%
- PEG ratio
- -1.1
- P/E ratio
- 17.8
- P/B ratio
- 2.6
- EV / EBITDA
- 13.8
- Industry P/E
- 19.4
- ROCE
- 11.4%
- ROCE 5y average
- 16.4%
- ROE
- 10.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.8
- Interest coverage
- 3.9
- Dividend yield
- 0.7%
- ROE 3y average
- 11.0%
- ROE last year
- 11.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹11,506 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹739 Cr
- Operating margin
- 15.0%
- Net profit margin
- 6.4%
- EBITDA margin
- 14.6%
- Sales growth 3y
- 0.6%
- Sales growth 5y
- 14.7%
- Profit growth 3y
- -16.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 12.0%
- EPS
- ₹58.4
- Sales growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 0.0%
- Dividend payout
- 17.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹3,256 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹490 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 22.5%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 100.8%
- OPM latest quarter
- 26.0%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹543
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹5,670 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹536 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹5,670 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 53.3
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹206 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹1,386 Cr
- FCF yield
- -9.9%
- Net cash flow
- ₹24 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 45.6%
- FII holding
- 10.0%
- DII holding
- 14.7%
- Public holding
- 29.7%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRF | 2,460.00 | 32.5 | 72,921 | 0.37 | 758.9 | 75.5 | 5,033.3 | 31.8 | 14.6 |
| Deepak Fertilis. | 1,415.40 | 18.2 | 17,868 | 0.71 | 490.0 | 101.5 | 3,256.3 | 22.5 | 11.4 |
| Tata Chemicals | 609.80 | 15,535 | 1.80 | 60.0 | -106.8 | 4,255.0 | 14.4 | 3.4 | |
| G N F C | 618.20 | 8.8 | 9,084 | 3.40 | 312.0 | 275.9 | 2,238.0 | 39.8 | 12.0 |
| Tanfac Inds. | 3,168.50 | 101.3 | 6,855 | 0.14 | 16.9 | -12.9 | 187.2 | 6.3 | 23.9 |
| Gujarat Alkalies | 616.00 | 68.2 | 4,524 | 2.87 | 55.0 | 499.0 | 1,244.9 | 12.7 | 1.4 |
| Grauer & Weil | 81.05 | 22.9 | 3,675 | 0.62 | 39.8 | -8.7 | 298.7 | 17.9 | 20.6 |
| Median | 198.00 | 20.0 | 724 | 0.28 | 7.3 | 59.0 | 106.4 | 14.4 | 10.3 |
Competes with: ARCL Organics Limited, Alufluoride Limited, Amines & Plasticizers Limited, Chemfab Alkalis Limited, Chemplast Sanmar Limited, GHCL Limited, Grauer & Weil India Limited, Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited, Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited, IG Petrochemicals Limited, Indo Borax & Chemicals Limited, J.G.Chemicals Limited, Jocil Limited, Kanchi Karpooram Limited, Lords Chloro Alkali Limited, Mangalam Organics Limited, OCCL Limited, POCL Enterprises Limited, Primo Chemicals Limited, SRF Limited, Sadhana Nitrochem Limited, Shanti Inorganics Limited, Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Limited, TECIL Chemicals and Hydro Power Limited, TGV Sraac Limited, Tata Chemicals Limited, The Andhra Sugars Limited, Thirumalai Chemicals Limited, Transpek Industry Limited, Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 2,313 | 2,424 | 1,853 | 2,086 | 2,281 | 2,747 | 2,579 | 2,667 | 2,659 | 3,006 | 2,830 | 3,011 | 3,256 |
| Expenses | 2,032 | 2,138 | 1,570 | 1,648 | 1,817 | 2,253 | 2,093 | 2,187 | 2,146 | 2,542 | 2,477 | 2,657 | 2,411 |
| Material Cost | 1,466 | 1,493 | 1,595 | 1,737 | 1,596 | 1,526 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 151 | -24 | -144 | -294 | 251 | -141 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 152 | 262 | 631 | 574 | 324 | 501 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 115 | 155 | 151 | 155 | 162 | 199 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 303 | 260 | 309 | 305 | 325 | 325 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 281 | 286 | 282 | 438 | 464 | 494 | 486 | 480 | 513 | 464 | 353 | 354 | 845 |
| OPM % | 12 | 12 | 15 | 21 | 20 | 18 | 19 | 18 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 26 |
| Other Income | 20 | 19 | 11 | 72 | 12 | 7 | 13 | 50 | 24 | 27 | 46 | 6 | 6 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 79 | 107 | 106 | 112 | 111 | 103 | 98 | 101 | 88 | 75 | 96 | 93 | 95 |
| Depreciation | 59 | 81 | 91 | 102 | 95 | 100 | 100 | 109 | 103 | 106 | 108 | 106 | 105 |
| Profit before tax | 162 | 117 | 97 | 296 | 270 | 299 | 301 | 320 | 345 | 310 | 195 | 161 | 651 |
| Tax % | 30 | 46 | 37 | 22 | 26 | 28 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 31 | 27 | 13 | 25 |
| Net Profit | 114 | 63 | 61 | 230 | 200 | 214 | 253 | 278 | 244 | 214 | 141 | 139 | 490 |
| EPS in Rs | 8.72 | 4.76 | 4.56 | 18 | 15 | 17 | 20 | 22 | 19 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 39 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 22 | 19 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 39 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 3,808 | 4,309 | 4,150 | 5,995 | 6,742 | 4,685 | 5,808 | 7,663 | 11,301 | 8,676 | 10,274 | 11,506 | 12,104 |
| Expenses | 3,512 | 3,952 | 3,676 | 5,451 | 6,285 | 4,221 | 4,848 | 6,307 | 9,135 | 7,389 | 8,350 | 9,821 | 10,087 |
| Material Cost | 5,697 | 6,421 | |||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 159 | -211 | |||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 814 | 1,790 | |||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 583 | 623 | |||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 1,097 | 1,199 | |||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 297 | 358 | 474 | 544 | 457 | 465 | 961 | 1,356 | 2,165 | 1,287 | 1,925 | 1,685 | 2,016 |
| OPM % | 8 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 15 | 19 | 15 | 17 |
| Other Income | 37 | 71 | 13 | 23 | 54 | 95 | 27 | 44 | 84 | 123 | 81 | 102 | 85 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Interest | 111 | 130 | 121 | 173 | 229 | 243 | 188 | 155 | 195 | 404 | 413 | 353 | 359 |
| Depreciation | 124 | 122 | 135 | 163 | 171 | 214 | 212 | 233 | 239 | 334 | 403 | 424 | 425 |
| Profit before tax | 98 | 177 | 230 | 230 | 110 | 103 | 588 | 1,013 | 1,816 | 672 | 1,189 | 1,010 | 1,316 |
| Tax % | 32 | 34 | 33 | 29 | 33 | 14 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 30 | 21 | 27 | |
| Net Profit | 67 | 116 | 155 | 164 | 73 | 89 | 406 | 687 | 1,221 | 468 | 945 | 739 | 985 |
| EPS in Rs | 6.71 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 6.97 | 8.50 | 39 | 56 | 96 | 36 | 74 | 58 | 78 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 74 | 58 | |||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 52 | 38 | 34 | 33 | 37 | 31 | 19 | 16 | 10 | 24 | 14 | 17 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 10%
- 5 years
- 15%
- 3 years
- 1%
- TTM
- 14%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 25%
- 5 years
- 12%
- 3 years
- -16%
- TTM
- 0%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 21%
- 5 years
- 27%
- 3 years
- 31%
- 1 year
- -8%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 13%
- 5 years
- 15%
- 3 years
- 11%
- Last year
- 11%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 88 | 89 | 103 | 121 | 126 | 126 | 126 | 126 |
| Reserves | 1,384 | 1,439 | 1,928 | 1,958 | 2,010 | 2,092 | 2,600 | 3,764 | 4,941 | 5,416 | 6,110 | 6,718 |
| Borrowings | 1,384 | 1,970 | 2,013 | 3,532 | 3,032 | 3,015 | 2,593 | 2,656 | 3,699 | 4,149 | 4,152 | 5,670 |
| Other Liabilities | 584 | 957 | 1,019 | 1,413 | 1,988 | 1,735 | 1,865 | 2,204 | 2,655 | 2,226 | 2,516 | 3,766 |
| Minority Interest | 17 | 619 | ||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 3,440 | 4,454 | 5,048 | 6,991 | 7,118 | 6,931 | 7,161 | 8,744 | 11,421 | 11,917 | 12,905 | 16,281 |
| Fixed Assets | 1,384 | 1,317 | 2,056 | 2,189 | 2,209 | 2,712 | 2,621 | 2,644 | 2,678 | 6,258 | 6,292 | 6,151 |
| CWIP | 152 | 396 | 385 | 654 | 1,370 | 1,310 | 1,619 | 2,428 | 3,528 | 754 | 1,408 | 3,053 |
| Investments | 253 | 72 | 154 | 388 | 252 | 12 | 449 | 879 | 600 | 261 | 186 | 133 |
| Other Assets | 1,651 | 2,668 | 2,453 | 3,761 | 3,286 | 2,897 | 2,472 | 2,794 | 4,615 | 4,644 | 5,018 | 6,944 |
| Total Assets | 3,440 | 4,454 | 5,048 | 6,991 | 7,118 | 6,931 | 7,161 | 8,744 | 11,421 | 11,917 | 12,905 | 16,281 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -54 | -110 | 796 | -132 | 1,310 | 578 | 1,248 | 1,211 | 493 | 732 | 1,880 | 206 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -189 | -62 | -840 | -1,139 | -576 | -156 | -634 | -1,430 | -979 | -376 | -1,062 | -1,559 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 205 | 330 | -81 | 1,269 | -737 | -354 | -613 | 221 | 604 | -410 | -689 | 1,376 |
| Net Cash Flow | -38 | 157 | -125 | -1 | -3 | 69 | 1 | 3 | 118 | -54 | 129 | 24 |
| Free Cash Flow | -213 | -458 | 51 | -1,073 | 588 | 227 | 1,014 | 222 | -716 | -94 | 763 | -1,387 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 91 | 131 | 115 | 120 | 76 | 99 | 58 | 30 | 55 | 62 | 57 | 74 |
| Inventory Days | 51 | 66 | 63 | 62 | 57 | 75 | 61 | 76 | 60 | 74 | 58 | 79 |
| Days Payable | 30 | 51 | 54 | 73 | 102 | 143 | 124 | 103 | 85 | 80 | 94 | 98 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 112 | 146 | 124 | 108 | 30 | 32 | -5 | 3 | 30 | 56 | 22 | 55 |
| Working Capital Days | 5 | 4 | -50 | -72 | -32 | -28 | -17 | -18 | 15 | 20 | 2 | 30 |
| ROCE % | 7 | 8 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 14 | 19 | 25 | 11 | 16 | 11 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
4,08,01,418inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
1 Oct, 17:00 IST · Company event · low impact
Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited: Action(s) taken or orders passed
28 Sept, 18:30 IST · Company event · medium impact
Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited — Resignation of Mr Rabindra Purohit, Vice President - Legal, Company Secretary & Compliance Officer (Key Managerial Personnel) w.e.f. September 28, 2026.
20 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · medium impact
Chambal Fertilizers & Chemicals Limited has begun commercial production
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- ARCL Organics Limited
- Alufluoride Limited
- Amines & Plasticizers Limited
- Chemfab Alkalis Limited
- Chemplast Sanmar Limited
- GHCL Limited
- Grauer & Weil India Limited
- Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Limited
- Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizers and Chemicals Limited
- IG Petrochemicals Limited
- Indo Borax & Chemicals Limited
- J.G.Chemicals Limited
- Jocil Limited
- Kanchi Karpooram Limited
- Lords Chloro Alkali Limited
- Mangalam Organics Limited
- OCCL Limited
- POCL Enterprises Limited
- Primo Chemicals Limited
- SRF Limited
- Sadhana Nitrochem Limited
- Shanti Inorganics Limited
- Sree Rayalaseema Hi-Strength Hypo Limited
- TECIL Chemicals and Hydro Power Limited
- TGV Sraac Limited
- Tata Chemicals Limited
- The Andhra Sugars Limited
- Thirumalai Chemicals Limited
- Transpek Industry Limited
- Tuticorin Alkali Chemicals & Fertilizers Limited
Uses as raw material
- Ammonia (partly imported; backward-integrated at Taloja 510k MTPA)
- Muriate of potash (MOP)
- Phosphoric acid
- Sulphur
Depends on the price of
- LNG
- Natural gas
- propylene
Sells to
- ACC Limited · Ammonium nitrate / explosives for limestone quarrying
- Ambuja Cements · Ammonium nitrate for limestone quarrying
- Coal India · Technical/prilled ammonium nitrate (LDAN/HDAN) for coal mining & blasting
- GOCL Corporation Limited · Technical ammonium nitrate (TAN) supply to IDL Explosives / GOCL
- Hindustan Zinc · Ammonium nitrate for zinc/lead mining & blasting
- Solar Industries India Limited · Technical ammonium nitrate (TAN) merchant supply to explosives manufacturer
- Tata Steel · Ammonium nitrate for captive iron-ore/coal mining & blasting
- UltraTech Cement · Ammonium nitrate for limestone quarrying
Buys from
- Adroit Infotech Limited · SAP consulting / implementation services; matches the site testimonial 'CIO, Leading Ferti…
- Crown Lifters Limited · Crane rental for chemical/fertiliser plant projects
- Ganesh Benzoplast Limited · bulk liquid storage and handling services for chemicals and petroleum products
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Chemicals
- Industry
- Commodity Chemicals
- Classification
- Chemicals › Commodity Chemicals
- ISIN
- INE501A01019
Business segments
- Fertilisers · 54%
- Chemical · 46%
- Realty · 0%
- Others · 0%
Plants
- Dahej nitric acid facility · Dahej / Vagra / Bharuch, Gujarat
- Gopalpur greenfield TAN plant · Gopalpur, Odisha
- Taloja manufacturing complex · Taloja / Raigad, Maharashtra
News impact
Big market events that reach Deepak Fertilizers and Petrochemicals Corporation Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 09:18 IST · Market event · high impact
Solar Industries’ Omnia acquisition to reshape growth, debt outlook
Solar Industries plans to buy Omnia Holdings, boosting long-term sales but adding debt that may dent near-term profit, with small sympathy upside for rivals and suppliers.
Who it hits first
- Solar Industries India, which makes explosives for mines and builders, plans to buy Omnia Holdings to grow much bigger by FY28.
- The deal should lift long-term sales and profit, but new loans to pay for it may squeeze profit in the next few quarters.
- Rival makers and parts suppliers are in focus, though no new orders or prices are named yet.
- The 'solar' name is a coincidence — Solar Industries makes explosives, not solar panels, so no power-sector chain follows.
Who may gain
- Solar Industries India (explosives maker) — bigger sales base after Omnia in the long run
- Paras Defence and Jyoti CNC Automation (parts and machine suppliers) — steadier orders if Solar expands
- Deepak Fertilisers (chemical supplier) — firmer input volumes on a larger Solar
- GOCL Corp and Premier Explosives (rival explosives makers) — possible sympathy buying on sector news
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, Coal India, the big coal miner, buys Solar's explosives to blast rock; the deal does not change its mines or digging plans, so demand stays flat.
Upstream
Upstream, Paras Defence, Jyoti CNC Automation, Deepak Fertilisers and Adroit Info send parts, machines and chemicals to Solar; a larger Solar could order more over time, but no fresh order is named.
Where demand moves
Business
Mines and builders need the same explosives today, so real business demand barely moves; any lift comes later if the bigger Solar wins more mine work after Omnia.
Capital
Investors may pay more for Solar on the growth story while also charging for the extra debt, and some money may drift to GOCL Corp and Premier Explosives as related bets.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Machine and parts makers like Paras Defence and Jyoti CNC could gain later if Solar orders more kit.
Chemicals
Leader Solar's buyout talk lifts mood for explosives makers; rivals GOCL Corp and Premier Explosives may see sympathy interest.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India, the miner customer, is barely touched as digging plans do not change.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Patterns
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Oil & Gas
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days Solar's stock may swing on deal talk while rivals and suppliers see small sympathy moves.
Medium term
In 1-6 months progress on approvals and debt plans decides whether the long road to FY28 growth looks worth the cost.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks focus shifts to deal price, loans and profit impact, capping big gains until terms are clear.
26 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · high impact
Fertiliser shares rally up to 14% after Russia assures India of uninterrupted urea and complex fertiliser supply
Russia promised India it will keep sending fertiliser despite US sanctions pressure, so fertiliser makers jumped up to 14% - but every similar supply-relief announcement this year has faded within a month.
Who it hits first
- Urea and complex fertiliser makers get certainty that imported raw material will keep arriving before rabi sowing: FACT, RCF, NFL, Chambal Fertilisers, Coromandel, GSFC
- The risk that was removed was a physical supply break, not a price change - subsidy-capped state makers see their output protected but not their margin
Who may gain
- Farmers, who avoid a urea shortage in the October-to-March rabi season
- Coromandel and Chambal, the two private makers whose margin is not capped by the subsidy formula
- Rural-facing businesses - tractor makers, two-wheeler makers and rural lenders - if a normal rabi crop follows
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Farmers get assured urea and DAP availability for the rabi sowing season starting October, which protects wheat and mustard acreage. That in turn protects the demand that flows to seed companies, crop-protection makers, tractor and two-wheeler dealers and rural lenders through the winter.
Upstream
Russian urea and phosphate exporters keep their India volumes, and the shipping and port handling chain serving that trade keeps its cargo. Indian importers avoid having to scramble for costlier alternative cargoes from West Asia, which had been disrupted by the Hormuz situation earlier this year.
Where demand moves
Business
This removes a threatened supply cut rather than creating new demand. Fertiliser volumes were always going to be sold - the question was whether the raw material would arrive. With that answered, Indian plants keep running at plan and the import trade with Russia continues. The genuinely new demand is one step downstream: farmers who were holding back sowing plans on input uncertainty can now commit, which supports seed, crop-protection and farm-equipment orders into the rabi season.
Capital
Money rushed into the whole fertiliser pocket on the headline, pushing shares up as much as 14% in a single session regardless of individual company quality - FACT, which earns 1.60% on equity, rose alongside Coromandel, which earns 16.41%. The measured record says that indiscriminate flow reverses within a month, rotating back out of the subsidy-capped state names and, at best, staying in the two private makers.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Tractor and two-wheeler demand is rural-led and benefits from an uninterrupted sowing season
Chemicals
Fertiliser makers rerate on the headline, though state-owned names stay subsidy-capped
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
A normal rabi crop supports rural incomes and staples demand into the winter
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
The 14% move has already happened. Over the next week the risk is give-back rather than continuation, since the news is now in the price.
Medium term
Over one to six months the real driver is the rabi sowing data from October onwards and the FY27 subsidy allocation in the Budget. If sowing is normal, the rural demand chain - tractors, two-wheelers, staples - benefits more durably than the fertiliser makers themselves.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch whether Russian cargoes actually arrive and whether US sanctions enforcement touches the payment channel. All four comparable events this year faded within this window.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Assured fertiliser availability reduces rabi sowing risk -\u003e farmers are more willing to invest in pumps, tillers, irrigation equipment and replacement farm machinery -\u003e order visibility improves for agri-equipment suppliers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ESCORTS","VSTTILLERS","SHAKTIPUMP"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Effect depends on monsoon reservoir levels and crop price expectations.","sector":"Capital Goods - Farm Equipment and Irrigation","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower input-shortage risk -\u003e better crop-cycle confidence -\u003e higher demand for crop loans, tractor/equipment finance and rural working-capital credit -\u003e lower perceived stress in agri-linked lending books.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","M\u0026MFIN","CHOLAFIN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive is stronger for lenders with high rural or semi-urban exposure.","sector":"Financial Services - Rural and Agri Credit","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stable fertiliser supply supports sowing and farm income expectations -\u003e rural households defer fewer purchases -\u003e apparel, value retail and small-ticket discretionary demand sentiment improves.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VMART","V2RETAIL","DMART"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order demand effect and will need actual crop realization to sustain.","sector":"Retailing - Rural Discretionary Consumption","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Assured fertiliser availability supports cane nutrition and yield expectations -\u003e steadier sugarcane supply for mills -\u003e better operating leverage and ethanol feedstock visibility.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","EIDPARRY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant if key cane-growing regions also have adequate rainfall and water availability.","sector":"Sugar and Ethanol","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Fertiliser supply continuity reduces risk to cotton output -\u003e improved raw cotton availability and potentially softer cotton prices -\u003e margin relief for yarn, fabric and home-textile producers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VARDHACRLC","ARVIND","WELSPUNLIV"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is clearer for cotton-consuming textile firms than for upstream cotton-linked traders.","sector":"Textiles","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Uninterrupted fertiliser imports and domestic distribution -\u003e higher rail, port, warehousing and last-mile movement of fertilisers into rabi season -\u003e volume support for logistics operators.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","TCI","GATI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is volume-led, but fertiliser logistics is only one part of these companies' business mix.","sector":"Logistics and Warehousing","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower risk of fertiliser shortage -\u003e better crop-output visibility for grains, pulses and oilseeds -\u003e improved sourcing confidence for processors and agri-commodity companies.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LTFOODS","KRBL","AWL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Margin impact can be mixed if higher output lowers procurement cost but also pressures inventory values.","sector":"Food Processing and Agri Commodities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Russian fertiliser supply assurance reduces fear of emergency domestic production ramp-ups or costly spot LNG dependency for fertiliser plants -\u003e stabilizes gas-linked input planning and energy procurement assumptions.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["GAIL","PETRONET","ONGC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive for macro input-cost stability, but potentially negative for any expectation of incremental domestic gas demand from fertiliser producers.","sector":"Oil, Gas and Consumable Fuels","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
22 Aug, 04:30 IST · Market event · high impact
India buys its most expensive LNG in years as the Iran war reroutes cargoes - spot gas is $22.61 per MMBtu, up 20% in three months, and city gas distributors get only short-term policy relief
Imported gas has become the dearest in years because the Iran conflict is diverting shipments, so companies that pipe gas to homes, cars and factories are paying much more for it while being slow to raise prices - and Petronet, which handles most of India's imports, sees buyers defer cargoes.
Who it hits first
- Petronet LNG carries the heaviest exposure of any company in the knowledge graph, a 95.2% cost weight on the LNG link, and sees it as deferred cargoes and lower terminal utilisation rather than as a direct margin cut.
- City gas distributors - Indraprastha Gas, Mahanagar Gas, Gujarat Gas and Adani Total Gas - are squeezed from both sides: their cheap administered domestic gas allocation keeps shrinking while the imported gas replacing it costs 20.2% more than three months ago.
- Gas-fed chemical and fertiliser plants, led by Deepak Fertilisers, take the cost rise straight into manufacturing margin with no substitute feedstock available.
- Gas-based power generators become uneconomic against coal at these prices and simply stop dispatching.
Who may gain
- Domestic gas producers ONGC and Oil India, whose own output is worth more when the imported alternative is dear.
- Coal and fuel-oil suppliers, because industrial users with dual-fuel boilers switch away from gas when the spread gets this wide - and the tracked thermal coal price has been flat at $96 a tonne for three months, which makes the switch more attractive.
- Pipeline construction contractors, from the separate PNGRB authorisation of 1,800 km of LPG pipelines carrying about Rs 7,000 crore of investment - a genuine order pipeline, though it is unrelated to today's gas price and converts over years.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Compressed-natural-gas vehicle owners and piped-gas households face price rises the distributors have so far been slow to pass on. Industrial gas users - ceramics, glass, textiles, fertiliser - either absorb the cost or switch fuel, and the ones that switch do not come back quickly, which turns a price spike into a lasting volume loss for the distributors.
Upstream
Qatari and US LNG suppliers and the shipowners carrying the cargoes capture the price rise. Hormuz risk lengthens voyages and pushes up charter rates and war-risk insurance, so a growing slice of the delivered cost is freight and insurance rather than the molecule itself, which is exactly why India is paying the most in years even though US Henry Hub gas at $2.79 per MMBtu is down 3.29% over the month.
Where demand moves
Business
Expensive imported gas destroys demand before it destroys margin. Industrial customers with dual-fuel boilers - ceramics kilns in Morbi, textile dyeing units, glass furnaces - switch to coal or fuel oil within weeks, so GAIL and the city gas distributors lose volume first. That lost volume flows backwards to Petronet, whose terminals then handle fewer cargoes, and forwards to coal and fuel-oil suppliers who pick up the switched demand. Compressed natural gas for vehicles is the stickiest segment because cars cannot switch fuel, which is why the distributors' retail books hold up better than their industrial books.
Capital
Money rotates out of the gas chain and toward domestic energy producers. Investors sell the buyers of imported gas - the distributors and Petronet - and buy the domestic producers whose realisations rise, which is the standard rotation on any imported-energy cost shock. Within the gas names the rotation favours those with the thickest operating margins, so Mahanagar Gas at an 18% operating margin against a sector median of 13% holds up better than GAIL at 8%.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Gas-fed ammonia, fertiliser and industrial chemical plants take a direct feedstock cost rise.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Importers and distributors squeezed, domestic producers benefit, refiners unaffected.
Power
Gas-based generation stops being economic against coal and is simply not dispatched.
Services
Longer voyages and higher war-risk insurance lift shipping and port handling revenue per cargo.
codex additions
- Ceramics & Tiles
- Glass & Building Materials
- Automobiles - CNG Vehicles
- Oil Marketing Companies
- Shipping & Ports
- Textiles & Apparel
- Cement & Construction Materials
- Metals & Mining
- Paints & Adhesives
Commodity angle
Basis note
margin_impact_bps is computed against the three-month move of 20.20%, which is the move that makes this newsworthy - the one-month move is only 2.77%. Formula: change_pct x cost_weight_pct / 100 x 100.
Commodity
LNG
Edge coverage note
Fifteen other companies hold a DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge to LNG (CHEMFAB, IRMENERGY, GUJENERGY, SWANCORP, MGL, GSPL, DEEPAKFERT, IGL, GUJGASLTD, CONCOR, TORNTPOWER, ATGL, GAIL, RELIANCE and IOC) but none carries a cost_weight_pct on the edge, so no margin impact can be computed for them. IOC's edge direction is positive, the others negative.
Price updated at
2026-08-21T11:56:59Z
Shock type
price
Unit
USD/MMBtu
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Hormuz risk reroutes LNG cargoes and lengthens voyages
- Delivered LNG cost rises to $22.61 per MMBtu, up 20.2% in three months
- City gas distributors lose margin, industrial users switch to coal and fuel oil
- Petronet terminal throughput falls as buyers defer cargoes
- Gas-fed chemicals and fertiliser take a direct feedstock cost rise
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
- Chemicals
- Power
- Services
When it plays out
Immediate
Distributors typically do not fall hard on day one - Indraprastha Gas was actually up 0.42% the day after the August 2024 price event. The selling comes in the following days as the volume implication sinks in.
Medium term
Over one to six months the questions are whether the Hormuz risk premium persists, whether the government restores administered domestic gas allocation to the distributors, and whether lost industrial volume returns. Petronet's -9.91% one-month move after August 2024 shows the volume risk takes weeks to price.
Short term
Over one to four weeks watch for industrial customers switching to coal and fuel oil, and for the first retail price hikes from the distributors. The August 2024 precedent had Indraprastha Gas down 3.99% and Mahanagar Gas down 2.80% over exactly this window.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"High spot LNG raises gas cost for kilns and process heat; Morbi/Gujarat tile clusters face margin pressure or price hikes; demand may soften if real estate buyers resist pass-through.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KAJARIACER","SOMANYCERA","CERA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Gas is a material firing fuel for tiles/sanitaryware, making this a clean second-order margin channel. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Ceramics \u0026 Tiles","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"LNG-linked gas costs lift furnace/process-heat expenses for float glass, solar glass and packaging glass; higher input costs pressure spreads unless construction/solar demand absorbs price hikes.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASAHIINDIA","BORORENEW","LAOPALA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact varies by fuel contracts and ability to pass through costs. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Glass \u0026 Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"City gas distributors using more expensive imported LNG may raise CNG prices; CNG running-cost advantage narrows versus petrol/diesel; CNG vehicle demand and fleet conversion economics weaken.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MARUTI","TATAMOTORS","BAJAJ-AUTO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for OEMs with meaningful CNG or three-wheeler exposure. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Automobiles - CNG Vehicles","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher LNG and LPG-linked import costs plus new LPG pipeline capex can raise working-capital needs and subsidy/under-recovery risk if retail LPG prices are politically constrained.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Pipeline investment is structurally positive for logistics efficiency, but near-term commodity-cost absorption risk is negative. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Oil Marketing Companies","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Hormuz risk and LNG cargo rerouting increase voyage distances, charter rates, insurance premia and port handling complexity; Indian ports and shipping firms may see higher activity but also disruption risk.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SCI","GESHIP","ADANIPORTS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Beneficial for freight rates and handling volumes, negative if conflict disrupts flows. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Shipping \u0026 Ports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gas and alternate fuel costs rise for dyeing, processing, captive steam and industrial heat; export-oriented mills face margin pressure if global buyers resist pass-through.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ARVIND","KPRMILL","VTL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More acute for processing-heavy units than pure garment assemblers. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Textiles \u0026 Apparel","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Expensive gas pushes industrial users toward coal, petcoke and other fuels; broader energy-cost inflation can lift freight and kiln fuel costs while construction demand faces price pass-through.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Gas is not the main cement fuel, so linkage is indirect through the wider fuel basket and substitution demand. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Cement \u0026 Construction Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher gas prices raise process-heat costs for some metal producers while increasing substitution demand for coal/coke; integrated coal-linked producers may be relatively advantaged versus gas-exposed users.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JSWSTEEL","JINDALSTEL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on captive fuel access, furnace route and power procurement. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Metals \u0026 Mining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Gas-price spike lifts petrochemical and solvent-chain costs through energy-intensive intermediates; building-material inflation can also delay repainting or construction-linked demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","BERGEPAINT","PIDILITIND"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a downstream chemical derivative channel rather than direct LNG consumption. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Paints \u0026 Adhesives","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
2 Aug, 04:33 IST · Market event · high impact
Adani Total Gas raises CNG by Rs 4/kg as spot LNG jumps about 33% in a month to USD 21.4/MMBtu; jet fuel hiked about Rs 5 while commercial LPG is cut about Rs 200
The gas India imports has become about a third more expensive in a month, so companies that pipe gas to cars and homes are raising CNG prices; airlines pay more for jet fuel too, while restaurants get a small break because commercial cooking-gas cylinders became cheaper.
Who it hits first
- City gas distributors — Adani Total Gas, Indraprastha Gas, Mahanagar Gas, Gujarat Gas — are paying much more for the gas they sell, because the imported spot benchmark rose from USD 16.05 to USD 21.375 per million British thermal units in a month, and Adani Total Gas has already raised compressed natural gas (CNG) by Rs 4 per kg.
- Petronet LNG, whose cost base is 95.2% linked to that benchmark, faces the risk that Indian buyers defer cargoes when spot gas is this dear, cutting how much gas flows through its terminals.
- Airlines are hit separately: jet fuel (aviation turbine fuel) was raised about Rs 5 in the same revision.
- Gas-fed manufacturers — ceramic-tile makers in Morbi, glass makers, fertiliser and chemical plants like Deepak Fertilisers — face a straight increase in input cost with no quick substitute.
Who may gain
- Restaurant and hotel operators, whose commercial 19-kg cooking-gas cylinder became about Rs 200 cheaper — Jubilant FoodWorks, Devyani International, Westlife and Sapphire Foods all run on these.
- Domestic gas producers ONGC and Oil India, whose gas realisations rise with the global benchmark.
- Alternative fuels: when CNG's price advantage over petrol narrows, some fleet demand shifts back to petrol and diesel, which helps fuel retailers' volumes even as their crude costs rise.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
CNG buyers — taxi fleets, autorickshaws, city buses and increasingly Maruti's CNG car customers — pay Rs 4 more per kg at Adani Total Gas pumps, and the other distributors are likely to follow. Piped-gas households pay more for cooking. Ceramic, glass, fertiliser and chemical plants pay more for process gas and either raise product prices or run their kilns less. Airline passengers eventually pay through fares as the Rs 5 jet-fuel increase works into ticket prices.
Upstream
India imports the marginal molecule of gas as liquefied natural gas from Qatar, the United States and the spot market, and that price has risen about 33% in a month partly because of the same West Asia tensions lifting crude. Domestic administered-price gas is cheaper but rationed, so any growth in demand must be met at spot prices. Petronet LNG's terminals and GAIL's pipelines sit in the middle of that chain and see volumes fall when the imported price spikes.
Where demand moves
Business
Expensive imported gas moves cash from Indian gas buyers to global LNG sellers. City gas distributors try to recover it by raising CNG prices, which pushes taxi, autorickshaw and fleet operators back towards petrol and diesel, so volume leaks from the gas chain to the liquid-fuel chain. Industrial gas users go further — Morbi's ceramic kilns switch to coal gasifiers when gas gets uncompetitive, so Gujarat Gas loses the volume outright rather than just the margin. Meanwhile the Rs 200 cut in commercial cooking-gas cylinders sends a small amount of cash the other way, from fuel retailers to restaurant and hotel operators.
Capital
Investors sell the expensively-valued growth story in the city-gas group first — Adani Total Gas at a PE of 113 has the furthest to fall — and rotate towards the cheap, debt-free distributors (Indraprastha Gas at a PE of 13.8, Mahanagar Gas at 13.1) that can survive a squeezed quarter. A second flow moves out of gas-exposed names entirely and into domestic gas producers ONGC and Oil India, which capture the price rise rather than paying it. Restaurant operators see only token buying because the cooking-gas saving is too small to change their earnings.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Restaurant and hotel chains get a small cost break from the roughly Rs 200 cut in commercial cooking-gas cylinders.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
City gas distributors face a margin-versus-volume trade-off; Petronet LNG faces terminal-utilisation risk; domestic gas producers gain on realisation.
Power
Gas-fired generation becomes uneconomic to dispatch, shifting the load towards coal and renewables.
Services
Airlines absorb a roughly Rs 5 jet-fuel increase they cannot immediately pass into already-sold tickets.
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
LNG
Note
The rank-affectedness ranker resolved the LNG move as -2.061% over its own short lookback window and therefore inverted every edge role, marking gas consumers 'positive'. That window is wrong for this event: commodity_prices shows LNG at USD 16.05/MMBtu on 30 June 2026 and USD 21.375/MMBtu on 30 July 2026, a rise of 33.2%, and the Neo4j Commodity node records change_1m_pct of 33.39. All directions below are hand-inverted back to the rising-price case (gas consumers negative, producers positive).
Price updated at
2026-07-30
Shock type
price
Unit
USD/MMBtu
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- West Asia supply risk lifts crude and, with it, spot LNG about 33% in a month
- City gas distributors raise CNG by Rs 4/kg, narrowing CNG's advantage over petrol
- Jet fuel up about Rs 5, hitting airline cost base
- Gas-fired power becomes uneconomic, load shifts to coal and renewables
- Ceramic, glass and fertiliser plants face higher process-gas costs
- Commercial LPG cut about Rs 200 gives restaurants a partial offset
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
- Oil & Gas
- Services
- Power
- Consumer Services
When it plays out
Immediate
CNG hike days have historically produced muted or negative moves for distributors rather than a pricing-power rally: on the April 2025 gas-allocation revision Mahanagar Gas fell 5.11% and Indraprastha Gas 2.93% on day one. Expect a similar first-day reaction plus a knock to the airline.
Medium term
If spot gas stays above USD 20/MMBtu, expect Morbi's ceramic cluster to shift back to coal gasifiers, gas-fired power to be dispatched less, and the government to face pressure to allocate more cheap domestic gas to city gas distributors — the same policy lever that was tightened in April 2025.
Short term
Over the next four weeks watch whether the other distributors follow Adani Total Gas with their own CNG hikes, and whether CNG vehicle conversions slow. Watch Petronet LNG's cargo bookings, since a sustained USD 21/MMBtu spot price deters spot buying.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher CNG prices reduce running-cost advantage for CNG passenger cars, three-wheelers and commercial vehicles, potentially softening demand mix and aftermarket conversion demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MARUTI","TATAMOTORS","MOTHERSON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is sharper where CNG variants are a meaningful volume driver; partly offset if petrol/diesel remain expensive.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"CNG price hike raises operating costs for urban delivery fleets, taxis, buses and last-mile logistics; pass-through may lag, pressuring margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["VRLLOG","TCI","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for city-heavy fleets and contracted logistics where fuel escalation clauses are delayed or absent.","sector":"Logistics \u0026 Surface Transport","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher LNG/natural gas costs raise fuel and feedstock costs for gas-intensive chemical producers, especially those using gas for process heat or intermediates.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","GNFC","DEEPAKNTR"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on ability to pass through costs and exposure to imported versus domestic gas.","sector":"Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Natural gas is a key input for urea and ammonia-linked products; higher LNG prices can lift subsidy burden, working-capital needs, or margin pressure depending on policy pass-through.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["CHAMBLFERT","GNFC","RCF"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Negative for input costs and working capital; policy support can soften P\u0026L impact.","sector":"Fertilizers \u0026 Agrochemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher LNG and fuel costs increase kiln, captive power and logistics expenses; commercial LPG cut gives little offset versus industrial energy intensity.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Coal/petcoke remain more important, but LNG spikes can still affect blended fuel costs and sentiment.","sector":"Cement \u0026 Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Ceramic tile and sanitaryware manufacturing is gas-intensive; LNG/CNG price escalation can directly raise firing and processing costs.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KAJARIACER","CERA","SOMANYCERA"],"magnitude":"large","notes":"One of the clearer non-oil second-order impacts because gas is a major production fuel.","sector":"Ceramics, Tiles \u0026 Sanitaryware","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Glass furnaces and some packaging operations use substantial natural gas; higher LNG costs pressure energy margins unless passed to FMCG, pharma and beverage customers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASAHIINDIA","BOROLTD","UFLEX"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Pass-through is contract-dependent; specialty glass may absorb better than commodity packaging.","sector":"Glass \u0026 Packaging","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher gas and petrochemical-linked input costs can lift resin, solvent and manufacturing expenses while weaker construction affordability from fuel inflation may weigh on demand.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ASIANPAINT","BERGEPAINT","KANSAINER"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Crude derivatives matter more than gas directly, so this is a secondary input-cost and demand-sentiment channel.","sector":"Paints \u0026 Consumer Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Commercial LPG cut lowers cooking and processing costs for food-service-linked packaged players, but CNG/logistics inflation can raise distribution costs.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NESTLEIND","BRITANNIA","HINDUNILVR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Net effect varies by fuel mix, cold-chain exposure and freight pass-through.","sector":"Consumer Staples \u0026 Packaged Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Commercial LPG reduction supports store-level kitchen economics, but CNG-linked delivery and distribution costs rise for city networks.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","WESTLIFE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Your draft captures restaurants broadly; listed QSR and retail operators may also see mixed cost effects through delivery and commissary logistics.","sector":"Retail \u0026 QSR Supply Chain","time_horizon":"immediate"}
16 Jul, 04:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
Cabinet approves new investment policy for Urea — 8 new units to add 10 MT capacity
Who it hits first
- Domestic urea producers — CHAMBLFERT, RCF, NFL, FACT, GNFC — gain from policy support for ~10 MT of new capacity across 8 units.
Who may gain
- Urea makers via volume/capex visibility and lower import dependence; NPK/complex players (COROMANDEL, DEEPAKFERT) benefit indirectly via sector sentiment.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Farmers and the agri-input distribution chain gain from more assured, import-independent domestic urea availability.
Upstream
More urea capacity raises structural demand for natural gas/LNG feedstock (producers' key input) and plant/EPC equipment for the 8 new units.
Where demand moves
Business
New policy-backed urea units add domestic supply, substituting imports and giving producers volume growth; because urea MRP is administered, the gain accrues via throughput and subsidy-supported economics rather than price.
Capital
Modest rotation into cheap, cash-generative fertiliser names (CHAMBLFERT, GNFC) on improved capex/volume visibility; weak-balance-sheet PSUs (FACT) are value-trap risks despite the tailwind.
How it spreads across sectors
Agriculture
improved input security
Fertilizers
volume/capex tailwind, margins policy-capped
Oil & Gas
higher long-run gas/LNG feedstock demand
Commodity angle
Commodity
Urea
Note
New urea investment policy adds ~10 MT domestic capacity via 8 units. Urea MRP is administered/subsidised (NBS + fixed retail price), so producer realisations are policy-set, not market-priced — margin_impact_bps=0. Fertiliser producers have DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY->Natural gas (input) edges but this event is a capacity-investment policy, not a gas price/demand shock. Upside is volume/capex-led.
Price updated at
2026-04-26 (stale >7d — using policy context, not price)
Shock type
supply_capacity_policy
When it plays out
Immediate
Mild positive for urea producers on policy clarity
Medium term
Capacity comes online over years; import substitution and gas-feedstock demand build gradually
Short term
Attention on which players win new-unit allocations
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 25 Aug 2026 | unspecified | ₹10 |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sep 2025 | unspecified | ₹10 |
| 3 Sep 2024 | unspecified | ₹8.5 |
| 25 Aug 2023 | unspecified | ₹10 |
| 25 Aug 2022 | unspecified | ₹9 |
| 17 Aug 2021 | unspecified | ₹7.5 |
| 16 Sep 2020 | unspecified | ₹3 |
| 5 Aug 2019 | unspecified | ₹3 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Insider trades
| Disclosed | Who | Type | Shares | Value ₹ Cr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 Apr 2026 | Robust Marketing Services Private Limited · Promoters | EQUITY SHARES | 1,29,16,67,644 | — |
| 22 Apr 2026 | SCM Commercial Private Limited · Promoter Group | EQUITY SHARES | 1,29,16,67,644 | — |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-269 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY2731 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2629 May 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY2630 Jan 2026
- Earnings call · Q2FY266 Nov 2025
- Annual report · 2024-2518 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.