Gem Aromatics Limited
NSE: GEMAROMASpecialty Chemicals
Share price
₹148.11
+1.06% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
35
out of 100 · worked out 9 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹741 Cr
P/E ratio
—
P/B ratio
1.7
ROCE
3.4%
ROE
0.3%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Fewer than three years of filings — too early to judge growth.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew -24.0% a year against a sector median of 10.2% — 34.2 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
It has no earnings, so there is no price-to-earnings to compare.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
It has no earnings to weigh the price against.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gem Aromatics Limited — this one | -68%/yr | — | — |
| Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited | -24%/yr | 79.7× | — |
| Navin Fluorine International Limited | 21%/yr | 52.6× | ₹2.5 |
| Aether Industries Limited | 20%/yr | 96.9× | ₹4.8 |
| Deepak Nitrite Limited | -13%/yr | 27.6× | — |
| Atul Limited | 9%/yr | 21.5× | ₹2.4 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Specialty Chemicals), it ranks 65 of 73 on returns, 72 of 72 on growth, 44 of 73 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 3.4% on capital, ahead of 11% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹55 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹267 crore on plant and equipment, ₹212 crore more than it made; the gap was from lenders and shareholders. But only about 27 of every 100 rupees of profit it reported over 6 years arrived as cash — the rest is tied up. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 110 days for its cash to waiting 179 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
9 of 10 checks clear · 90%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue rose 13% but the new Dahej plant's costs turned the quarter into a ₹7.9 crore consolidated loss
Announced 13 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹99 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+12.8%
Revenue vs last quarter
-10.5%
Net profit
-₹8 Cr
Profit vs last year
-198.7%
Profit vs last quarter
-879.6%
Net margin
-8.0%
EPS
₹-1.56
Earnings call transcript · 14 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹741 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹148.11
- 52w High
- ₹254
- 52w Low
- ₹133
- Enterprise value
- ₹877 Cr
- Beta
- 1.2
- Price CAGR 1y
- -36.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- —
- Price CAGR 5y
- —
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 0.2%
- PEG ratio
- —
- P/E ratio
- —
- P/B ratio
- 1.7
- EV / EBITDA
- 30.1
- Industry P/E
- 31.9
- ROCE
- 3.4%
- ROCE 5y average
- 19.2%
- ROE
- 0.3%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.3
- Interest coverage
- 1.5
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- 13.0%
- ROE last year
- 0.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹366 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹1 Cr
- Operating margin
- 11.0%
- Net profit margin
- 0.3%
- EBITDA margin
- 11.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- -4.9%
- Sales growth 5y
- 3.6%
- Profit growth 3y
- -68.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- -43.0%
- EPS
- ₹0.3
- Sales growth TTM
- -24.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -127.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹99 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- -₹8 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 12.8%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- -198.6%
- OPM latest quarter
- 3.3%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹89.8
- Face Value
- ₹2.0
- Total debt
- ₹152 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹16 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹152 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 43.9
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹30 Cr
- Free cash flow
- -₹65 Cr
- FCF yield
- -10.5%
- Net cash flow
- ₹5 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 57.4%
- FII holding
- 0.8%
- DII holding
- 4.8%
- Public holding
- 37.0%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pidilite Inds. | 1,488.50 | 57.2 | 1,51,610 | 0.77 | 883.5 | 28.2 | 4,551.6 | 21.3 | 31.0 |
| Gujarat Fluoroch | 4,555.90 | 81.0 | 50,047 | 0.07 | 219.0 | 21.4 | 1,588.0 | 24.0 | 9.6 |
| Navin Fluo.Intl. | 8,490.00 | 54.8 | 43,566 | 0.18 | 243.3 | 107.7 | 1,045.1 | 44.1 | 21.0 |
| Aether Industri. | 1,787.60 | 98.9 | 23,727 | 0.00 | 62.8 | 28.0 | 326.6 | 27.3 | 11.9 |
| Deepak Nitrite | 1,553.90 | 26.8 | 21,194 | 0.48 | 345.0 | 207.5 | 2,577.6 | 36.4 | 11.4 |
| Aarti Industries | 491.25 | 34.1 | 17,820 | 0.20 | 155.0 | 256.5 | 2,387.0 | 42.5 | 6.9 |
| Atul | 5,999.50 | 22.2 | 17,664 | 0.50 | 253.9 | 92.0 | 1,848.0 | 25.0 | 14.9 |
| Gem Aromatics | 153.20 | 800 | 0.00 | -7.9 | -198.6 | 98.9 | 12.8 | 3.4 | |
| Median | 367.30 | 29.7 | 1,102 | 0.24 | 13.5 | 52.2 | 175.3 | 26.4 | 13.8 |
Competes with: Aarti Industries Limited, Aether Industries Limited, Atul Limited, Deepak Nitrite Limited, Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited, Navin Fluorine International Limited, Pidilite Industries
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 93 | 112 | 97 | 202 | 88 | 90 | 79 | 110 | 99 |
| Expenses | 78 | 97 | 84 | 156 | 73 | 86 | 72 | 95 | 96 |
| Material Cost | 72 | 95 | 81 | 76 | 99 | ||||
| Change in Inventories | -9.86 | -18 | -20 | 0.45 | -17 | ||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Employee Cost | 4.06 | 1.92 | 4.28 | 6.16 | 7.06 | ||||
| Other Expenses | 6.96 | 7.62 | 6.88 | 12 | 6.14 | ||||
| Operating Profit | 14 | 15 | 13 | 46 | 15 | 3.05 | 7.02 | 16 | 3.30 |
| OPM % | 15 | 14 | 13 | 23 | 17 | 3.41 | 8.90 | 14 | 3.34 |
| Other Income | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.50 | -0.43 | 1.27 | 0.98 | -1.66 | 0.30 | 0.16 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| Interest | 1.10 | 1.33 | 2.22 | 3.44 | 3.52 | 3.50 | 2.58 | 2.97 | 2.88 |
| Depreciation | 1.69 | 1.84 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 3.05 | 8.71 | 9.01 | 9.13 |
| Profit before tax | 12 | 13 | 9.42 | 40 | 11 | -2.52 | -5.93 | 4.03 | -8.55 |
| Tax % | 30 | 25 | 21 | 31 | 26 | 2.38 | -16 | 75 | -7.84 |
| Net Profit | 8.59 | 9.74 | 7.46 | 28 | 7.98 | -2.58 | -4.99 | 1.01 | -7.87 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.83 | 2.08 | 1.59 | 5.89 | 1.70 | -0.49 | -0.96 | 0.19 | -1.51 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 1.70 | -0.04 | -1.04 | 0.19 | -1.56 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 306 | 314 | 425 | 452 | 504 | 366 | 378 |
| Expenses | 275 | 265 | 359 | 374 | 415 | 326 | 349 |
| Material Cost | 324 | ||||||
| Change in Inventories | -47 | ||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 0 | ||||||
| Employee Cost | 16 | ||||||
| Other Expenses | 33 | ||||||
| Operating Profit | 31 | 49 | 66 | 78 | 88 | 41 | 29 |
| OPM % | 10 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 11 | 8 |
| Other Income | 4 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -0 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | ||||||
| Interest | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 13 | 12 |
| Depreciation | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7.34 | 23 | 30 |
| Profit before tax | 30 | 44 | 56 | 68 | 74 | 6.36 | -13 |
| Tax % | 23 | 30 | 20 | 26 | 28 | 78 | |
| Net Profit | 23 | 31 | 45 | 50 | 53 | 1.43 | -14 |
| EPS in Rs | 130 | 175 | 250 | 11 | 11 | 0.27 | -2.77 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.28 | ||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 4%
- 3 years
- -5%
- TTM
- -24%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -43%
- 3 years
- -68%
- TTM
- -127%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- —
- 1 year
- -36%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 16%
- 3 years
- 13%
- Last year
- 0%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9.37 | 10 |
| Reserves | 108 | 136 | 178 | 221 | 275 | 439 |
| Borrowings | 55 | 78 | 90 | 112 | 227 | 152 |
| Other Liabilities | 20 | 23 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 40 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | |||||
| Total Liabilities | 186 | 240 | 296 | 369 | 536 | 642 |
| Fixed Assets | 24 | 36 | 36 | 50 | 54 | 253 |
| CWIP | 2 | 1 | 11 | 30 | 126 | 6 |
| Investments | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Assets | 160 | 203 | 249 | 289 | 356 | 382 |
| Total Assets | 186 | 240 | 296 | 369 | 536 | 642 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -0 | -5 | 15 | 40 | -25 | 30 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -5 | -15 | -18 | -50 | -92 | -102 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | 7 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 105 | 78 |
| Net Cash Flow | 2 | -2 | 4 | 5 | -13 | 5 |
| Free Cash Flow | -6 | -19 | 1 | 1 | -130 | -65 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 63 | 46 | 68 | 37 | 102 | 76 |
| Inventory Days | 120 | 206 | 164 | 187 | 160 | 309 |
| Days Payable | 23 | 27 | 24 | 20 | 16 | 25 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 160 | 225 | 208 | 203 | 246 | 360 |
| Working Capital Days | 90 | 110 | 102 | 121 | 115 | 179 |
| ROCE % | 25 | 25 | 24 | 19 | 3 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
exports as % of revenue
97.00
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
136inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Gem Aromatics Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Mentha Arvensis
- crude clove leaf oil
- crude clove oil
- lemongrass oil
- mentha arvensis oil (mint oil)
- mentha piperita oil
Depends on the price of
- Medicinal Herbs
- mentha
Exports to
- Brazil
- China
- USA
Sells to
- Anhui Hautian Spices Company · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- Colgate-Palmolive India · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- Dabur India · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- Patanjali Ayurved Limited · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- Rossari Biotech Limited · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- S H Kelkar and Company Limited · aroma chemicals / fragrance ingredients
- Symrise · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- Ventos So Brasil Eireli · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
- doTERRA · specialty ingredients (essential oils, aroma chemicals and derivatives)
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Chemicals
- Industry
- Specialty Chemicals
- Classification
- Chemicals › Specialty Chemicals
- ISIN
- INE06XZ01023
Plants
- Budaun Facility · Budaun, Uttar Pradesh
- Dahej Facility · Dahej, Gujarat
- Gem Aromatics Silvassa (Site I)
- Silvassa Facility · Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
News impact
Big market events that reach Gem Aromatics Limited, and how the effect spreads.
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
White House names India a Tier-1 hub in China's shadow transshipment network, with $67bn routed via India, Mexico and Vietnam in 2025
The White House has publicly accused India of being one of the top three places where Chinese goods are re-routed to dodge US tariffs, and says new US trade deals will police this - which means slower US customs clearance and more paperwork for Indian exporters, especially small electronics, chemical and jewellery firms that sell mainly to America.
Who it hits first
- The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy has published a report naming India a Tier-1 hub in what it calls China's shadow transshipment network - meaning Chinese goods being routed through India to avoid US tariffs. The report puts $67 billion of transshipment through India, Mexico and Vietnam in 2025, costing the US $28 billion in tariff revenue. Trade adviser Peter Navarro named India directly, and anti-transshipment clauses will now be written into every new US trade deal. This lands in the middle of India-US tariff negotiations that were already complicated by US pressure over India's Russian oil purchases. Indian exporters to the US face more origin documentation, slower customs clearance and a harder negotiating backdrop.
Who may gain
- Exporters with fully domestic supply chains and verifiable origin paperwork, which can now differentiate themselves from competitors that rely on Chinese inputs.
- Testing, inspection and certification providers, and customs and trade-compliance software vendors, whose services become mandatory rather than optional.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US buyers of Indian goods face longer lead times and possible retroactive duty demands if origin is later challenged, so some will hold larger safety stock and others will dual-source outside India. Indian exporters' order books therefore see slower conversion rather than outright cancellation.
Upstream
Indian exporters that buy Chinese intermediates - dyes, pigments, aroma chemicals and electronic components - must now trace and document those purchases, which raises compliance cost and may force some to switch to costlier domestic or third-country suppliers. That is a demand transfer towards Indian intermediate makers over the next two to four quarters.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing physically stops moving, but the cost and time of moving it rises. Indian exporters must now document the origin of components on more shipments, which lengthens the cash cycle and ties up working capital. Demand does not disappear - it shifts towards exporters that can prove domestic content, and away from those whose products contain significant Chinese intermediates. Electronics assemblers and specialty chemical makers that buy Chinese inputs are most exposed; aerospace suppliers, whose origin rules were already strict and pre-audited, are least exposed.
Capital
Money is likely to rotate out of high-export, US-concentrated small and mid-cap manufacturers and towards domestically focused businesses, which is the pattern seen on the 31 July 2025 US tariff announcement. Within exporters, capital should favour those with either a US manufacturing footprint (Polyplex) or genuinely domestic value chains, over those reselling Chinese-origin content.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Component exporters with Chinese sub-assemblies face origin questions.
Capital Goods
Electronics assemblers face the heaviest scrutiny, since that is where Chinese components most often enter.
Chemicals
Exporters using Chinese intermediates face origin audits and slower clearance.
Consumer Durables
Gems and jewellery exports face diamond and gold origin scrutiny.
Services
Testing, certification and trade-compliance providers gain work.
Textiles
Garment and home-textile exporters to the US face documentation load and a harder tariff negotiation.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- US flags Chinese-origin content routed through India
- Indian exporters must document component origin on more shipments
- Working-capital cycles lengthen and US clearance slows
- Chemicals and electronics assemblers with Chinese intermediates take the largest hit
- Demand shifts to exporters with verifiable domestic value chains
- Testing, inspection and trade-compliance providers gain work
Pattern name
China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Textiles
- Chemicals
- Capital Goods
- Consumer Durables
- Automobile and Auto Components
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect high-export small and mid-caps to underperform. On the closest precedent - the 31 July 2025 US announcement of 25% tariffs on India - chemical and textile exporters fell 1% to 9% on the day, though aerospace-linked exporters actually rose.
Medium term
Over one to six months, exporters that can genuinely prove domestic content should recover and gain share from those that cannot. The structural risk is that India's China-plus-one advantage is partly neutralised if US buyers conclude that Indian origin is no longer a safe harbour.
Short term
Over one to four weeks the market will watch whether the India-US trade talks produce a deal that includes anti-transshipment clauses, and how onerous those clauses are. Any concrete US enforcement action against a named Indian exporter would sharply widen the sell-off.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"US trade enforcement tightens origin checks on India exports -\u003e pharma formulations/API exporters using Chinese KSMs/intermediates face documentation burden and possible shipment delays -\u003e firms with backward-integrated or India-sourced API chains gain relative advantage","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SUNPHARMA","DIVISLAB","LAURUSLABS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"India is a major generic drug supplier to the US, while parts of the API/KSM chain remain China-linked.","sector":"Pharmaceuticals and APIs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"India named as a transshipment hub -\u003e US scrutiny rises on electronics assembled in India with Chinese subassemblies -\u003e EMS exporters face higher compliance costs, slower clearance, and pressure to localize components","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KAYNES","DIXON","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Separate from broad capital goods; risk is concentrated in assembly-led electronics value chains.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rules-of-origin checks and anti-transshipment enforcement increase documentation and inspection intensity -\u003e container dwell times and rerouting risk rise -\u003e logistics operators may see volume friction but also demand for compliance-heavy forwarding and warehousing","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Near-term operational disruption could be offset by higher demand for traceable logistics services.","sector":"Ports, Shipping and Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US targets Chinese-origin transshipment -\u003e Indian exporters of steel, aluminium, fasteners, pipes and engineered metal products using Chinese inputs face origin challenges -\u003e mills with domestic sourcing benefit from substitution demand","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JINDALSTEL","APLAPOLLO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Metal goods are common anti-dumping and circumvention targets globally.","sector":"Metals and Metal Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters face delayed customs clearance and higher documentation demands -\u003e working-capital cycles stretch and receivable risk rises -\u003e banks with export credit exposure may see higher demand but also elevated monitoring risk","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ICICIBANK","SBIN","AXISBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect, via exporter liquidity and LC/documentary trade flows.","sector":"Banks and Trade Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters need auditable origin records, supplier traceability and customs documentation -\u003e demand rises for ERP, supply-chain traceability, analytics and compliance automation -\u003e IT firms serving manufacturing/export clients benefit","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More likely a services-demand tailwind than a near-term earnings driver.","sector":"IT Services and Compliance Technology","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"US anti-transshipment clauses raise burden of proof on origin -\u003e exporters need third-party certification, material testing, audit trails and supplier verification -\u003e TIC providers see higher demand","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INTERTEK","BUREAUVERITAS","SIS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play NSE exposure is limited; SIS is an imperfect proxy, while many TIC leaders are not NSE-listed.","sector":"Testing, Inspection and Certification","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Origin verification becomes more stringent -\u003e exporters revise labelling, batch tracking, barcoding and packaging documentation -\u003e demand improves for compliant packaging and traceability-linked materials","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","TCPLPACK","HUHTAMAKI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order beneficiary through compliance adaptation rather than direct trade exposure.","sector":"Packaging and Labelling","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Report lands during India-US tariff talks already strained by Russian oil pressure -\u003e broader trade negotiation risk raises probability of scrutiny or concessions around refined-product flows and crude sourcing -\u003e refiners with export exposure face policy uncertainty","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["RELIANCE","IOC","BPCL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Not a pure transshipment link, but connected through the same India-US trade enforcement channel.","sector":"Oil and Gas Refining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
13 Aug, 04:28 IST · Market event · high impact
Ocean freight rates to the US and Europe surge three to four times, with Indian exporters now paying over $9,000 per container
Shipping a container from India to America or Europe now costs over $9,000, three to four times what it did, so Indian exporters of clothes, chemicals and machinery lose price competitiveness, while shipping companies that own the vessels earn much more.
Who it hits first
- Exporters of bulky, low-value-density goods - garments, agrochemicals, essential oils, engineering goods - lose price competitiveness because freight is charged per container regardless of contents
- Working capital cycles stretch as voyages lengthen and payment against delivery gets pushed out by weeks
- Perishable and refrigerated exports such as seafood face the sharpest hit, since longer voyages raise both cost and spoilage risk
Who may gain
- Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge directly - Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India own the vessels earning the higher rates
- Air cargo and express logistics gain share as exporters of high-value, time-sensitive goods switch from sea to air
- Freight forwarders and multimodal operators earn more on routing complexity, though their margin depends on passing carrier surcharges through without losing volume
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream buyers are US and European Union retailers, distributors and formulators. They face higher landed costs and respond by reordering from nearer suppliers or demanding a price concession from the Indian supplier. Ports and container terminals see mixed effects - longer dwell times and transshipment work rise, but underlying export volumes fall.
Upstream
Indian exporters' upstream suppliers - cotton ginners and spinners feeding garment makers, basic chemical producers feeding formulators - lose order volume with a one-to-two-month lag as export orders slow. Container availability at Indian ports is the binding constraint: empty boxes are stranded on longer rotations, so even exporters willing to pay struggle to book space.
Where demand moves
Business
Overseas demand for Indian goods does not disappear - it relocates. Under free-on-board terms the buyer pays the freight, so the buyer sees a higher landed cost for Indian cargo and reorders from suppliers closer to home: Mexico and Eastern Europe for the US and European Union markets, Vietnam and Bangladesh for garments. Indian exporters keep the order only by conceding on price, which is the real margin hit. In the opposite direction, demand flows to whoever owns vessel capacity - carriers and ship owners - and to air cargo for high-value goods that can absorb the airfreight premium.
Capital
Money rotates out of export-dependent manufacturers - textiles, agrochemicals, engineering goods, seafood - and into the asset owners who capture the surcharge: Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India. Some also rotates into domestic-demand businesses that have no export exposure at all, since this is a purely trade-side shock.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Agrochemical and pigment exporters face freight that is a large share of delivered price on high-volume cargo
Pharma
Least affected of the exporters - formulations are high value per container, so freight is a small share of the invoice
Services
Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge; freight forwarders gain routing work
Textiles
Garment exports lose landed-cost competitiveness against Vietnam and Bangladesh just as US tariff pressure had begun to ease
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
fuel
Note
Freight itself is not a tracked Commodity node. What is tracked, and what matters here, is bunker fuel: ship owners capture the freight surcharge but pay 11.41 percent more for fuel than a month ago, so the fuel edge is the cost offset against the revenue gain. Only Great Eastern Shipping carries a recorded fuel cost weight (13.39 percent); Shipping Corporation of India has the edge with no weight.
Shock type
cost_offset
Unit
USD/gallon
When it plays out
Immediate
Shipping stocks lead - the December 2023 Red Sea precedent had Great Eastern Shipping up 6.41% in a day. Exporters drift lower as buyers begin renegotiating.
Medium term
The January 2024 precedent shows the shipping trade has the longer legs - Shipping Corporation of India was up 31.01% a month later while Gokaldas Exports was down 2.67%. Rates normalise only when the chokepoint disruptions ease, which is tied to the Hormuz situation.
Short term
Watch export order books and the container availability position at Nhava Sheva and Mundra. Exporters will flag freight in their next quarterly commentary; the government may be pressed for a freight subsidy or interest-equalisation extension.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"High container freight to US/EU raises landed cost for exported components, reducing buyer margins and order competitiveness versus Mexico/Eastern Europe suppliers; working-capital cycle can stretch if shipments are delayed by rerouting.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BHARATFORG","SONACOMS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for export-oriented component makers with meaningful Europe/US exposure.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Although high-value shipments can use air freight, bulkier jewellery exports and importer replenishment still face logistics cost inflation and delivery uncertainty; weak buyer resistance can compress exporter margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is smaller than low-value bulky goods because value density is high, but export demand and delivery reliability can still be hit.","sector":"Gems and Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Longer voyages and higher refrigerated container costs raise delivered prices for shrimp and seafood exports to US/EU; cold-chain delays increase spoilage and rejection risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","WATERBASE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Shrimp exporters are sensitive to both freight rates and transit-time reliability.","sector":"Seafood and Aquaculture Exports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight spike raises landed costs for rice, spices, tea, coffee and processed foods; lower-value or bulky exports lose competitiveness fastest, especially where contracts are price-sensitive.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","TATACONSUM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on product value density and ability to pass through freight surcharges.","sector":"Agricultural and Processed Food Exports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exported machinery, forgings, castings and industrial products face higher container costs and delayed delivery windows, hurting competitiveness and execution timelines for overseas orders.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CGPOWER","SKFINDIA","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book execution may be affected more than immediate demand if delays persist.","sector":"Engineering Goods and Industrial Machinery","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight volatility increases demand for forwarding, route planning, warehousing and multimodal alternatives; however, margin benefit depends on ability to pass carrier surcharges without volume loss.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Asset-light forwarders may gain on spreads and volumes, while exporters cutting shipments can cap upside.","sector":"Freight Forwarders and Multimodal Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rerouting and schedule disruptions can increase dwell time, transshipment complexity and demand for container handling/storage; but weaker export volumes can offset handling gains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Beneficiaries mainly if congestion/storage revenues rise without a sharp fall in throughput.","sector":"Ports and Container Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters of high-value or time-sensitive goods may shift from sea to air to protect delivery commitments, supporting air cargo and express logistics demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INDIGO","BLUEDART","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Only viable for high-value, low-weight products; not a broad substitute for container freight.","sector":"Air Cargo and Express Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US/EU-bound leather goods and footwear are price-sensitive exports; freight inflation raises landed costs and can shift incremental orders toward closer or cheaper competing suppliers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BATAINDIA","RELAXO","MIRZAINT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Listed pure-play export exposure is limited, but the sector-level causal link is defensible.","sector":"Footwear and Leather Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 3 rows from NSE's archive (replace 0, delete 2, insert 1), 2026-01-15..2026-05-28 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 15 Jan 2026
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Jul 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 8,04,521 | ₹217.85 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 8,04,521 | ₹217.74 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 5,12,900 | ₹221.06 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | MICROCURVES TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 5,12,900 | ₹221.19 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | BUY | 5,12,884 | ₹213.39 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | SELL | 5,02,921 | ₹217.49 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | GRT STRATEGIC VENTURES LLP | SELL | 4,06,103 | ₹217.37 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | GRT STRATEGIC VENTURES LLP | BUY | 4,06,103 | ₹217.28 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | SILVERLEAF CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 3,48,469 | ₹217.17 |
| 8 Jul 2026 | SILVERLEAF CAPITAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 3,48,469 | ₹216.85 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call · Q1FY2714 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2628 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call22 May 2026
- Earnings call27 Jan 2026
- Earnings call14 Nov 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.