ICICI Lombard General Insurance
NSE: ICICIGIGeneral Insurance
Share price
₹1,624.00
+2.14% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
69
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹80,875 Cr
P/E ratio
33.3
P/B ratio
4.8
ROCE
21.9%
ROE
17.8%
Dividend yield
0.8%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 11.8% over the past year, and 15.7% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 6.6% to 11.3% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 15.7% a year against a sector median of 16.0% — 0.3 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 33.3× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 38.0×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 41.5×, the 12th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 2.4 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 14%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Lombard General Insurance — this one | 14%/yr | 33.3× | ₹2.4 |
| General Insurance Corporation of India | 12%/yr | 6.1× | ₹0.51 |
| Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited | -3%/yr | 38.0× | — |
| The New India Assurance Company Limited | 99%/yr | 33.9× | ₹0.34 |
| Go Digit General Insurance Limited | 148%/yr | 49.1× | — |
| Niva Bupa Health Insurance Company Limited | 127%/yr | 82.6× | — |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (General Insurance), it ranks 1 of 6 on returns, 3 of 6 on growth. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 17.8% on capital, ahead of 83% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
This question does not fit a lender: the money it lends out is its day-to-day outflow and the deposits or premiums it takes are the inflow, so a cash bridge cannot say whether its growth pays for itself. Look at the return on owners' money instead.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
Not enough filed accounts to run these checks yet.
Latest result
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Results are expected soon.
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹80,875 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹1,624.00
- 52w High
- ₹2,065
- 52w Low
- ₹1,423
- Enterprise value
- —
- Beta
- 0.7
- Price CAGR 1y
- -15.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 7.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 1.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 3.6%
- PEG ratio
- 2.4
- P/E ratio
- 33.3
- P/B ratio
- 4.8
- EV / EBITDA
- —
- Industry P/E
- 35.9
- ROCE
- 21.9%
- ROCE 5y average
- 21.8%
- ROE
- 17.8%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.0
- Interest coverage
- —
- Dividend yield
- 0.8%
- ROE 3y average
- 17.0%
- ROE last year
- 17.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹26,994 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹2,772 Cr
- Operating margin
- 14.0%
- Net profit margin
- 10.3%
- EBITDA margin
- 13.8%
- Sales growth 3y
- 14.7%
- Sales growth 5y
- 17.3%
- Profit growth 3y
- 14.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 12.0%
- EPS
- ₹55.6
- Sales growth TTM
- 12.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- -9.0%
- Dividend payout
- 24.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹7,088 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹403 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 10.8%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- -46.1%
- OPM latest quarter
- 7.4%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹334
- Face Value
- ₹10.0
- Total debt
- ₹0 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹776 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹0 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 32.4
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹2,622 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹2,380 Cr
- FCF yield
- 2.9%
- Net cash flow
- ₹554 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 51.2%
- FII holding
- 21.4%
- DII holding
- 20.6%
- Public holding
- 6.6%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICICI Lombard | 1,590.00 | 32.7 | 79,439 | 0.85 | 403.2 | -46.0 | 7,088.2 | 10.8 | 21.9 |
| General Insuranc | 316.55 | 6.3 | 55,536 | 4.19 | 1,743.7 | -31.1 | 14,400.9 | -1.5 | 17.4 |
| Star Health Insu | 553.85 | 38.6 | 32,601 | 0.00 | 549.7 | 25.5 | 5,522.1 | 13.2 | 9.7 |
| New India Assura | 159.29 | 34.1 | 26,251 | 0.94 | -239.2 | -160.6 | 11,899.7 | 1.5 | 4.3 |
| Go Digit General | 264.75 | 49.7 | 24,493 | 0.00 | 86.4 | -37.5 | 2,427.0 | 8.5 | 13.1 |
| Niva Bupa Health | 77.38 | 82.1 | 14,309 | 0.00 | 137.8 | 92.9 | 2,471.3 | 27.9 | 3.1 |
| Median | 290.65 | 36.4 | 29,426 | 0.42 | 270.5 | -34.3 | 6,305.2 | 9.7 | 11.4 |
Competes with: General Insurance Corporation of India, Go Digit General Insurance Limited, Niva Bupa Health Insurance Company Limited, Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited, The New India Assurance Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,716 | 5,271 | 5,194 | 5,391 | 5,601 | 6,147 | 6,161 | 6,051 | 6,396 | 6,869 | 6,905 | 6,825 | 7,088 |
| Expenses | 4,206 | 4,509 | 4,639 | 4,701 | 4,831 | 5,207 | 5,199 | 5,443 | 5,415 | 5,825 | 6,051 | 6,138 | 6,566 |
| Operating Profit | 510 | 762 | 555 | 690 | 770 | 940 | 962 | 609 | 981 | 1,044 | 854 | 686 | 522 |
| OPM % | 11 | 14 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 10 | 7.37 |
| Other Income | 10 | 2 | 19 | 8 | 4 | -21 | -2 | 60 | 13 | 33 | 16 | 32 | 14 |
| Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Depreciation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Profit before tax | 520 | 764 | 574 | 698 | 774 | 919 | 960 | 668 | 994 | 1,077 | 870 | 718 | 536 |
| Tax % | 25 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 25 |
| Net Profit | 390 | 577 | 431 | 520 | 580 | 694 | 724 | 510 | 747 | 820 | 659 | 547 | 403 |
| EPS in Rs | 7.95 | 12 | 8.76 | 11 | 12 | 14 | 15 | 10 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 11 | 8.08 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,234 | 6,033 | 7,520 | 6,912 | 11,163 | 11,517 | 12,161 | 16,026 | 17,876 | 20,572 | 23,961 | 26,994 | 27,687 |
| Expenses | 4,456 | 5,269 | 6,601 | 7,174 | 9,494 | 9,745 | 10,090 | 15,010 | 16,612 | 17,918 | 20,554 | 23,264 | 24,581 |
| Operating Profit | -221 | 764 | 919 | -262 | 1,669 | 1,772 | 2,072 | 1,016 | 1,264 | 2,654 | 3,407 | 3,731 | 3,107 |
| OPM % | -5 | 13 | 12 | -3.80 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 11 |
| Other Income | 992 | 0 | -2 | 1,569 | -2 | 15 | 12 | 809 | 991 | 35 | 39 | 93 | 94 |
| Interest | 12 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Depreciation | 54 | 57 | 7 | 51 | 0 | 90 | 130 | 141 | 142 | 134 | 124 | 165 | 0 |
| Profit before tax | 705 | 708 | 910 | 1,196 | 1,598 | 1,697 | 1,954 | 1,684 | 2,113 | 2,555 | 3,321 | 3,659 | 3,201 |
| Tax % | 17 | 28 | 23 | 28 | 34 | 30 | 25 | 24 | 18 | 25 | 24 | 24 | |
| Net Profit | 585 | 507 | 702 | 862 | 1,049 | 1,194 | 1,473 | 1,271 | 1,729 | 1,919 | 2,508 | 2,772 | 2,428 |
| EPS in Rs | 13 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 23 | 26 | 32 | 26 | 35 | 39 | 51 | 56 | 49 |
| Dividend Payout % | 15 | 26 | 22 | 17 | 26 | 13 | 25 | 35 | 28 | 28 | 25 | 24 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 16%
- 5 years
- 17%
- 3 years
- 15%
- TTM
- 12%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 18%
- 5 years
- 12%
- 3 years
- 14%
- TTM
- -9%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 1%
- 3 years
- 7%
- 1 year
- -15%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 18%
- 5 years
- 17%
- 3 years
- 17%
- Last year
- 17%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 447 | 448 | 451 | 454 | 454 | 454 | 455 | 491 | 491 | 493 | 496 | 498 |
| Reserves | 2,439 | 2,789 | 3,450 | 4,087 | 4,946 | 5,680 | 7,144 | 8,702 | 9,953 | 11,712 | 13,989 | 16,135 |
| Borrowings | 0 | 0 | 485 | 485 | 485 | 485 | 485 | 255 | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 |
| Other Liabilities | 11,760 | 12,440 | 18,965 | 24,723 | 27,517 | 30,423 | 31,214 | 41,401 | 44,607 | 51,068 | 54,660 | 59,477 |
| Total Liabilities | 14,646 | 15,676 | 23,351 | 29,750 | 33,403 | 37,042 | 39,298 | 50,848 | 55,086 | 63,308 | 69,145 | 76,111 |
| Fixed Assets | 381 | 510 | 516 | 368 | 1,965 | 664 | 717 | 941 | 883 | 930 | 728 | 834 |
| CWIP | 9 | 10 | 11 | 38 | 17 | 12 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 94 | 74 | 88 |
| Investments | 10,200 | 11,426 | 14,806 | 18,193 | 20,714 | 26,327 | 30,788 | 38,412 | 42,836 | 48,584 | 53,508 | 58,338 |
| Other Assets | 4,056 | 3,730 | 8,018 | 11,151 | 10,707 | 10,039 | 7,779 | 11,485 | 11,342 | 13,700 | 14,835 | 16,851 |
| Total Assets | 14,646 | 15,676 | 23,351 | 29,750 | 33,403 | 37,042 | 39,298 | 50,848 | 55,086 | 63,308 | 69,145 | 76,111 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | -98 | 511 | 1,628 | 2,390 | 2,976 | 3,433 | 1,774 | 809 | 2,290 | 2,407 | 1,147 | 2,622 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 171 | -310 | -1,990 | -1,896 | -2,856 | -3,382 | -1,367 | 135 | -1,685 | -1,921 | -1,137 | -1,733 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -93 | -148 | 361 | -96 | -310 | -420 | -212 | -879 | -695 | -355 | -257 | -336 |
| Net Cash Flow | -20 | 53 | -1 | 398 | -190 | -369 | 195 | 65 | -90 | 131 | -247 | 554 |
| Free Cash Flow | -150 | 459 | 1,574 | 2,315 | 2,860 | 3,130 | 1,695 | 737 | 2,170 | 2,217 | 918 | 2,380 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 292 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Working Capital Days | -576 | -532 | -521 | -720 | -564 | -670 | -705 | -690 | -685 | -661 | -603 | -599 |
| ROCE % | 27 | 23 | 24 | 17 | 31 | 27 | 27 | 19 | 21 | 23 | 24 | 22 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
incurred claims ratio % (general insurer)
76.40pct
2026-06-30
combined ratio %
107pct
2026-06-30
gross written premium per quarter of a general insurer (standalone), incl. inward reinsurance
8,860inr_cr
2026-06-30
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
1,79,86,407inr
2026-03-31
solvency ratio (multiple)
2.71x
2026-06-30
News
News and filings about ICICI Lombard General Insurance. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Depends on the price of
- Interest Rates
Products sold by
Buys from
- Intense Technologies Limited · Insurance customer communications management software
- Medi Assist Healthcare Services Limited · TPA / health-benefits claims administration services
- R K Swamy Limited · full-service market research services; carried-forward seed (IPO RHP client list). The FY2…
- Reliable Data Services Limited · back-office processing and policy/claims support services
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Financial Services
- Industry
- General Insurance
- Classification
- Financial Services › General Insurance
- ISIN
- INE765G01017
News impact
Big market events that reach ICICI Lombard General Insurance, and how the effect spreads.
22 Sept, 09:48 IST · Market event · high impact
Anup Bagchi Emerges As Front-Runner For HDFC Bank MD And CEO: Sources
Sources say ICICI veteran Anup Bagchi may lead HDFC Bank as next chief, likely steadying HDFC Bank shares a little while ICICI group names stay roughly flat pending confirmation.
Who it hits first
- Sources told NDTV Profit that Anup Bagchi, a long-time ICICI group manager, is the front-runner to become the next boss (MD and CEO) of HDFC Bank, India's largest private bank.
- If confirmed, clearer leadership could steady confidence in HDFC Bank, while HDFC Life Insurance, the life insurer, and HDFC Asset Management, the fund manager, see only a small shared-brand halo.
- ICICI Bank, the large private bank, plus ICICI Lombard general insurance, ICICI Prudential Life Insurance and ICICI Prudential Asset Management face no business change, only brief talk about a senior manager possibly leaving.
Who may gain
- HDFC Bank, India's largest private bank, if investors welcome a clear successor.
- HDFC Life Insurance, the life insurer, and HDFC Asset Management, the fund manager, could see a tiny sentiment lift from the shared HDFC name.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
No direct supply-chain link downstream — HDFC Bank names no customer firms in the pack, and borrowers feel no change from a leadership report.
Upstream
No direct supply-chain link upstream — technology and service vendors to HDFC Bank, such as Infosys and Tanla, face no order change from a CEO rumor.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand for loans, deposits and fee services does not move on a CEO rumor — customers of HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank keep borrowing and saving as before.
Capital
Capital may tilt slightly toward HDFC Bank on succession clarity, with brief steady buying, while ICICI group names stay roughly flat until any exit is confirmed.
How it spreads across sectors
Banking
Large private banks steady a touch as HDFC Bank succession talk clears, with no change in loans or deposits.
Financial Services
HDFC and ICICI group insurers and fund managers stay flat, moving only on shared-name sentiment.
When it plays out
Immediate
1–7 days: HDFC Bank steadies modestly on the report; ICICI names trade flat as investors wait for confirmation.
Medium term
1–6 months: new CEO plans for growth and bad loans matter more than the appointment headline.
Short term
1–4 weeks: price holds only if the board or bank confirms the pick; silence lets the lift fade.
13 Aug, 04:28 IST · Market event · medium impact
Supreme Court rulings will raise general insurers' third-party motor liability exposure
Court rulings mean insurers must pay bigger compensation on motor accident claims, which raises costs for general insurers with large motor books and, if premiums rise to cover it, for truck and fleet operators too.
Who it hits first
- General insurers with large motor third-party books face higher claim severity on a premium they cannot reprice, because the rate is regulator-set
- Reserves must be strengthened for claims already incurred but not yet settled, which hits reported profit in the quarter it is recognised
- The national reinsurer takes a proportionate share of the same severity increase
Who may gain
- Insurers with a low motor mix and a high health or commercial mix - the effect is concentrated in motor, so a diversified book is a relative shelter
- Telematics, driver-scoring and claims-analytics providers gain as insurers invest to control claim leakage
- Accident-trauma hospital operators gain from a larger compensation pool backing medico-legal billing
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream sit vehicle owners and fleet operators, who eventually pay any premium increase, and the industries that depend on road freight. Cement and fast-moving consumer goods distribution are the most road-freight-intensive, so they absorb a small distribution-cost increase with a lag of two to four quarters, and only if the regulator actually revises rates.
Upstream
Insurers' upstream input is reinsurance capacity. Higher claim severity raises reinsurance pricing at renewal, which is a cost for the primary insurers and revenue for the reinsurer - so the effect partly rotates within the industry rather than leaving it. Actuarial and claims-technology vendors see more demand.
Where demand moves
Business
Insurance demand is compulsory for motor third-party cover, so volumes do not fall - the cost per unit rises. If the regulator raises third-party premium rates in response, the increase passes to vehicle owners, and most sharply to commercial fleet operators who carry the highest third-party exposure per vehicle. Those operators then seek higher freight rates, which pushes the cost into road-freight-dependent industries - cement, steel, fast-moving consumer goods distribution. Until a rate revision comes, the cost sits entirely with the insurers.
Capital
Money rotates within general insurance from the motor-heavy state-owned insurers toward the diversified private insurers, and out of general insurance toward life insurance and asset managers, which have no motor exposure. The move is small: this is a rulings-driven, slow-burn cost increase rather than an event with a single dated impact.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Higher third-party premiums raise total cost of ownership, marginally denting commercial vehicle demand
Financial Services
General insurer combined ratios worsen on the motor line; the reinsurer absorbs part and reprices at renewal
Insurance & NBFC
Motor-heavy books de-rate relative to diversified health and commercial books
codex additions
When it plays out
Immediate
Minimal - this is a rulings-driven cost increase without a single dated event, so it is absorbed gradually rather than in one session.
Medium term
If a rate revision follows, insurers recover over two to four quarters and the cost moves to fleet operators and then to freight rates. If no revision comes, the motor line's structural losses widen and state-owned insurers' solvency gets more attention.
Short term
Watch insurers' next quarterly disclosures for motor loss ratios and any reserve strengthening. Watch the insurance regulator for signals on a third-party rate revision, which is the offsetting lever.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Higher motor third-party claims can translate into higher TP premiums for commercial vehicles; fleet operators face higher operating costs and may need to pass through freight-rate increases.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["VRLLOG","TCIEXP","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Impact is larger for owned-fleet operators than asset-light logistics platforms.","sector":"Transportation \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher accident-compensation burden increases pressure on road-safety upgrades, signage, black-spot remediation and highway maintenance spending by public agencies and concessionaires.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["IRB","PNCINFRA","ASHOKA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect policy-spend linkage; not an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Roads, Highways \u0026 Infrastructure EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Larger claim compensation pools can improve recovery prospects for trauma care, accident treatment documentation and medico-legal hospital billing tied to motor accident cases.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["APOLLOHOSP","FORTIS","MAXHEALTH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Ruling does not increase accident frequency, only the economics around compensation and claim settlement.","sector":"Healthcare Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"General insurers facing higher claims severity may invest more in claims analytics, fraud detection, automation, actuarial tooling and policy administration upgrades.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit likely accrues through BFSI technology budgets rather than a sector-wide demand shock.","sector":"IT Services and Insurance Technology","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Commercial fleets and insurers may adopt telematics, driver scoring, GPS tracking and usage-based risk monitoring to reduce accident severity and claims leakage.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["BHARTIARTL","TATACOMM","TEJASNET"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most visible if insurers respond with risk-based underwriting or fleet-safety incentives.","sector":"Telecom and IoT Connectivity","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If TP premium hikes raise truck ownership and freight costs, bulk commodity logistics costs for steel, cement, coal and minerals can rise, pressuring margins where pass-through is delayed.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JSWSTEEL","NMDC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order cost effect through road freight intensity.","sector":"Metals and Mining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cement has high road-freight dependence; higher commercial vehicle insurance costs can feed into freight rates and distribution costs.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","AMBUJACEM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on whether transporters can pass higher premiums into freight contracts.","sector":"Cement and Building Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher trucking and last-mile fleet insurance costs can marginally raise distribution expenses for high-volume consumer goods companies.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["HINDUNILVR","ITC","DABUR"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Likely diluted by scale and pass-through, but defensible as a broad logistics-cost channel.","sector":"FMCG and Consumer Distribution","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
5 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · high impact
Supreme Court orders longer compulsory motor insurance — four years for new cars, six for new two-wheelers — and asks the Centre to plan denying fuel to uninsured vehicles
Buyers of new cars and bikes must now pay for one extra year of compulsory accident insurance upfront, which makes vehicles slightly costlier and locks insurers into prices they cannot raise for up to six years — bad for insurers, mildly bad for two-wheeler makers, and good for accident victims.
Who it hits first
- Motor insurers must now sell four-year (car) and six-year (two-wheeler) accident cover at a price the regulator fixes on the day of sale, and cannot raise it until the policy expires — while repair bills, hospital costs and court awards keep climbing. That is why the industry's own body, the General Insurance Council, asked the court not to do it.
- New India Assurance carries the largest motor book and the thinnest cushion, already running an operating margin of -1.65% against a Financial Services sector operating-margin median of 36.4.
- New cars and two-wheelers get more expensive on the road, because the whole extra year of premium is collected upfront at purchase.
Who may gain
- Accident victims and their families, who are the point of the order — the court acted because roughly 56 out of every 100 vehicles on Indian roads carry no insurance at all.
- If the government actually builds the no-insurance-no-fuel system the court asked for, every general insurer gains an enormous new pool of customers — but that is a plan the court has requested, not a rule that exists yet.
- Insurers collect several years of premium upfront and earn investment income on that cash while claims trickle out over the policy's life, which partly offsets the frozen pricing.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream sit vehicle dealers and online insurance distributors. Dealers must now collect a larger upfront insurance payment as part of the on-road price, which lengthens the paperwork and financing at the point of sale. Distributors such as Policybazaar lose renewal transactions, because a policy that lasts six years generates far fewer commission events than six annual ones.
Upstream
GIC Re sits upstream of every motor insurer, because Indian general insurers must cede a fixed share of their motor accident business to the national reinsurer. The frozen multi-year pricing therefore flows up to GIC Re's book without it having written a single policy itself.
Where demand moves
Business
Demand does not disappear, it shifts in time: instead of a customer buying motor cover once a year, the insurer collects four to six years of premium in one go at the showroom. That front-loads cash into insurers but removes the annual chance to reprice, and it removes renewal transactions from online distributors such as Policybazaar who earn a commission on each one. Two-wheeler and small-car buyers see a higher on-road price, which nudges a slice of entry-level demand toward the used-vehicle market, where the mandate does not apply.
Capital
Money moved out of listed general insurers on 4 August — New India Assurance -2.10%, ICICI Lombard -1.80% and PB Fintech -3.21% on a day the Nifty fell about 0.6% — and toward the better-capitalised private underwriters and away from the state-owned book with the weakest margins. Within autos, capital favoured Hero MotoCorp, which rose 1.61%, because a one-year extension is a far smaller shock than the original 2018 jump.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
The on-road price of new vehicles rises by one extra year of premium, felt most on entry-level two-wheelers where the premium is the largest share of the purchase price.
Financial Services
General insurers lose the ability to reprice their compulsory motor book annually, and the reinsurer inherits the same risk through mandatory cessions.
When it plays out
Immediate
Insurance and two-wheeler stocks reprice over the first few sessions — the selling on 4 August was concentrated in New India Assurance, ICICI Lombard and PB Fintech. Attention now turns to how fast IRDAI issues the implementing circular, since the court asked it to act immediately.
Medium term
Over six months the bigger question is whether the government actually builds the fuel-for-insurance system. India has roughly 56% of vehicles uninsured, so linking petrol pumps to insurance records would be the single largest expansion of the general insurance market in decades — a large positive that would swamp the pricing problem. Watch also whether IRDAI wins the ability to reprice long-tenure policies mid-term.
Short term
Over the next few weeks IRDAI must notify the new tenures and, critically, decide what price to set for four- and six-year cover. If it allows a meaningful loading for the extra year of inflation risk, most of the damage to insurers is undone; if it does not, the pressure is real. Dealers rework on-road price lists.
2 Aug, 04:33 IST · Market event · medium impact
IRDAI tightens insurer ownership norms — prior approval now needed for any shareholding change above 5% and for promoter-group transfers — while easing the rules for injecting fresh capital
India's insurance regulator now wants to approve anyone buying or selling more than 5% of an insurer, but has made it easier for insurers to raise fresh money — which slows down ownership deals while helping insurers fund growth.
Who it hits first
- Anyone wanting to buy or sell more than 5% of an Indian insurer must now get the regulator's approval first, which slows down and adds conditionality to every stake sale, private-equity exit and strategic partnership.
- The requirement now extends to transfers inside a promoter group, closing the route companies previously used to reshuffle holdings without regulatory review.
- Dilution caused by an existing shareholder simply not participating in a capital raise is now itself treated as a transfer needing approval — a significant tightening for insurers with reluctant minority holders.
- Working the other way, the rules for injecting fresh capital into insurers have been eased, so funding growth becomes simpler even as changing ownership becomes harder.
Who may gain
- Insurers with settled ownership and a clear need for growth capital — ICICI Lombard and Bajaj Finserv's insurance subsidiaries — which get the easing without the friction.
- LIC, where the government's dominant holding means the 5% approval threshold is effectively irrelevant.
- Existing minority shareholders in insurers generally, because prior scrutiny of large stake changes reduces the risk of a disorderly ownership shift.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Policyholders are largely unaffected in the near term, though better-capitalised insurers can price more competitively and settle claims more reliably. Distribution partners — banks selling insurance at the counter, online aggregators such as Policybazaar, and agent networks — benefit from insurers having more capital to support new policy volume. Corporate buyers of insurance see marginally better capacity as underwriting capital expands.
Upstream
Insurers are funded by shareholder capital and premium float. Easier capital-infusion rules reduce the frictional cost of the first, which helps promoters and foreign partners top up capital when growth demands it. Reinsurers see modestly higher demand as policy books grow. Investment banks and legal advisers, which earn fees arranging insurance-sector stake deals, face a slower pipeline because every material transaction now needs prior clearance.
Where demand moves
Business
Easier capital infusion means insurers can write more policies sooner, so demand flows to the distribution channels that sell those policies — bank branches under bancassurance arrangements, online aggregators like Policybazaar, and agency networks. Insurers that can now fund growth faster will also buy more reinsurance and invest more premium float into government and corporate bonds. On the restrictive side, demand for insurance-sector deal-making falls: private-equity firms and foreign partners looking to enter or exit face a slower, more conditional process, so investment-banking and advisory activity in the sector cools.
Capital
Money moves towards insurers whose ownership is already settled and whose growth is capital-constrained rather than approval-constrained — ICICI Lombard, LIC and the Bajaj insurance businesses. It moves away from insurers whose investment case depends on an unresolved stake restructuring, because the path to resolution just got longer; Max Financial is the clearest example. There is no meaningful rotation out of the sector as a whole, because the easing and the tightening roughly offset in aggregate.
How it spreads across sectors
Financial Services
Banks that promote insurance subsidiaries face slower stake-rebalancing but easier capital support; advisory and investment-banking fee pipelines in the sector cool.
Insurance & NBFC
Deal-making in insurance stakes slows while organic growth funding gets easier — a shift in favour of operators over consolidators.
When it plays out
Immediate
Little price reaction is expected — this is a regulatory amendment, not a shock. Insurers with pending or rumoured stake transactions may see the widest spreads as the market recalculates deal odds.
Medium term
Over six months the easing on capital infusion should show up as faster growth in policy volumes at well-run insurers, while the tightening shows up as fewer and slower ownership transactions across the sector.
Short term
Over the following weeks watch whether any announced insurance stake transaction is delayed or re-cut to fit the new approval requirement, which would be the first concrete evidence of the friction.
16 Jul, 04:25 IST · Market event · medium impact
ICICI Lombard Q1 profit falls 46% on commercial-insurance slowdown and higher claims
Who it hits first
- ICICIGI Q1 PAT fell 46% YoY on a commercial-insurance slowdown and higher claims, partly offset by strong retail-health and motor growth.
Who may gain
- Retail-health-focused insurers on the strong-demand read-through (STARHEALTH); no clear direct beneficiary of the miss itself.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Corporate/commercial insurance buyers may face firmer pricing as insurers re-rate commercial risk after the claims spike.
Upstream
Higher claims raise reinsurance cessions/costs, linking primary general insurers to reinsurers (GIC Re).
Where demand moves
Business
Weak commercial-lines underwriting and elevated claims pressure general insurers' profitability, while resilient retail-health demand keeps premium growth intact for health-focused players.
Capital
Near-term de-rating risk for richly-valued general insurers on the earnings miss; defensive interest in cheap reinsurers (GIC Re, P/B 0.91) and selective rotation toward retail-health growth stories.
How it spreads across sectors
Insurance & NBFC
commercial-lines profitability pressure; retail-health resilient
When it plays out
Immediate
Negative reaction risk for ICICIGI on the 46% PAT drop
Medium term
Commercial pricing cycle and claims normalisation determine recovery
Short term
Read-through to PSU/commercial-heavy insurers (NIACL) vs retail-health (STARHEALTH)
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 29 May 2026 | unspecified | ₹7 |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2025 | interim | ₹6.5 |
| 6 Jun 2025 | unspecified | ₹7 |
| 28 Oct 2024 | interim | ₹5.5 |
| 7 Jun 2024 | unspecified | ₹6 |
| 27 Oct 2023 | interim | ₹5 |
| 12 Jun 2023 | unspecified | ₹5.5 |
| 27 Oct 2022 | interim | ₹4.5 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 6), 2020-02-01..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 1 Feb 2020
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call · Q1FY2720 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2627 May 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.