Fin Cascade

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Limited

NSE: ARE&MAuto Components & Equipments

Share price

₹721.00

+0.10% close of 9 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹12,978 CrP/E 17.8

Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 7 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

70

out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹12,978 Cr

P/E ratio

17.8

P/B ratio

1.6

ROCE

12.2%

ROE

7.2%

Dividend yield

1.4%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹1,016.4552-week low ₹672.45

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Sales grew 12.7% over the past year, and 17.3% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 11% to 10.6% over the last four years.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

It grew 17.3% a year against a sector median of 10.5% — 6.8 percentage points faster.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

At 17.8× earnings against a market that pays 24.1× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 52.1×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 20.1×, the 25th percentile of its own range.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Limited — this one-10%/yr17.8×—
Samvardhana Motherson International Limited40%/yr35.3×₹0.88
Bosch Limited14%/yr55.3×₹3.9
Bharat Forge Limited33%/yr86.4×₹2.6
UNO Minda Limited23%/yr52.1×₹2.3
Schaeffler India Limited10%/yr45.4×₹4.5

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Auto Components & Equipments), it ranks 72 of 101 on returns, 19 of 99 on growth, 63 of 101 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 12.2% on capital, ahead of 29% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹5313 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹4668 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹853 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 8 years, about 135 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 51 days for its cash to waiting 37 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

8 of 9 checks clear · 89%

Latest result · Q1 FY27

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Revenue rose 24% and profit 16%, with margins squeezed by costlier alloy and acid.

Announced 10 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited

Revenue

₹4,215 Cr

Revenue vs last year

+23.9%

Revenue vs last quarter

+19.2%

Net profit

₹191 Cr

Profit vs last year

+15.7%

Profit vs last quarter

-39.2%

Net margin

4.5%

EPS

₹10.43

Earnings call transcript · 11 Aug 2026

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹12,978 Cr
Prev close
₹721.00
52w High
₹1,023
52w Low
₹670
Enterprise value
₹13,013 Cr
Beta
1.0
Price CAGR 1y
-27.0%
Price CAGR 3y
4.0%
Price CAGR 5y
-1.0%
Price CAGR 10y
-4.0%

Ratios

Return on assets
7.8%
PEG ratio
-1.8
P/E ratio
17.8
P/B ratio
1.6
EV / EBITDA
8.5
Industry P/E
32.0
ROCE
12.2%
ROCE 5y average
16.6%
ROE
7.2%
Debt / Equity
0.1
Interest coverage
27.8
Dividend yield
1.4%
ROE 3y average
11.0%
ROE last year
7.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹13,814 Cr
Annual profit
₹896 Cr
Operating margin
11.0%
Net profit margin
6.5%
EBITDA margin
10.9%
Sales growth 3y
10.0%
Sales growth 5y
14.1%
Profit growth 3y
-10.0%
Profit growth 5y
-3.0%
EPS
₹48.9
Sales growth TTM
13.0%
Profit growth TTM
-7.0%
Dividend payout
22.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹4,215 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹191 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
23.9%
YoY quarterly profit growth
15.8%
OPM latest quarter
9.6%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹450
Face Value
₹1.0
Total debt
₹406 Cr
Total cash
₹259 Cr
Borrowings
₹406 Cr
Reserves / Equity
448.9

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
₹1,118 Cr
Free cash flow
-₹220 Cr
FCF yield
-2.0%
Net cash flow
₹68 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
32.9%
FII holding
17.3%
DII holding
15.3%
Public holding
34.5%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
Samvardh. Mothe.159.2036.81,67,9220.381,075.781.535,243.816.613.4
Bosch44,410.0055.41,30,9300.61706.15.25,841.922.021.5
Bharat Forge1,841.8089.190,0030.46-89.9-57.74,639.918.712.6
Uno Minda1,104.8052.363,8900.24315.51.85,556.923.819.6
Schaeffler India3,797.0046.059,4550.92336.713.72,681.417.527.9
Sona BLW Precis.810.5065.550,9560.42220.173.41,157.250.815.1
Tube Investments2,388.0074.046,3620.15294.0-15.36,215.317.117.1
Amara Raja Ener.733.2518.413,4221.45190.915.94,214.523.912.2
Median462.1030.01,6320.3212.322.3265.521.416.4

Competes with: Bharat Forge Limited, Bosch Limited, Samvardhana Motherson International Limited, Schaeffler India Limited, Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited, Tube Investments of India Limited, UNO Minda Limited

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales2,7962,9603,0452,9083,2633,2513,2723,0603,4013,4673,4103,5364,215
Expenses2,4292,5342,5892,4982,8262,8182,8672,7193,0383,0933,0363,1503,809
Material Cost1,7161,8012,0962,2472,2052,352
Change in Inventories-57-0.87-82-15611233
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade392584288175207391
Employee Cost201222251236246267
Other Expenses466431540535481566
Operating Profit367425456410437433406341364374374386406
OPM %1314151413131211111111119.63
Other Income2429243330251462618150-1520820
Exceptional items (within Other Income)00122-481810
Interest888119141110119101512
Depreciation117122122123123127132144142150157158159
Profit before tax266325350309335317409213229365192421255
Tax %25272326262627242824272525
Net Profit198238268230249236298162165276140314191
EPS in Rs121416131413168.839157.661710
Diluted EPS in Rs8.839157.661710

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales6,7936,8397,1508,69710,39211,70812,84613,81414,627
Expenses5,8385,7416,0337,6668,94510,04611,22512,30913,088
Material Cost7,2878,350
Change in Inventories-164-228
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade1,5561,254
Employee Cost823955
Other Expenses1,7271,987
Operating Profit9551,0991,1171,0311,4471,6621,6221,5051,539
OPM %141616121414131111
Other Income4355867129106222353362
Exceptional items (within Other Income)111255
Interest71211153034444546
Depreciation261301319396450484526607624
Profit before tax7308418736919971,2501,2731,2071,233
Tax %3421262627252626
Net Profit483661647513731934945896922
EPS in Rs283938304351524950
Diluted EPS in Rs5249
Dividend Payout %2528291514192022

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
—
5 years
14%
3 years
10%
TTM
13%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
—
5 years
-3%
3 years
-10%
TTM
-7%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
-4%
5 years
-1%
3 years
4%
1 year
-27%

Return on equity

10 years
—
5 years
11%
3 years
11%
Last year
7%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital1717171717181818
Reserves3,3183,6384,1934,5355,9906,7807,3718,081
Borrowings588492126201157261406
Other Liabilities1,1021,2611,4951,6981,7532,0212,5112,914
Minority Interest00
Total Liabilities4,4965,0005,7976,3767,9618,97610,16111,419
Fixed Assets1,8131,8292,4552,4923,7473,8074,0144,657
CWIP3158273998302496411,2981,658
Investments2015628077427714682464
Other Assets2,3482,1892,6632,9773,5383,8144,1674,641
Total Assets4,4965,0005,7976,3767,9618,97610,16811,457

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity5411,1778026339451,2661,3511,118
Cash from Investing Activity-448-830-616-482-773-1,020-1,132-924
Cash from Financing Activity-92-364-122-213-112-242-160-126
Net Cash Flow2-1864-626035968
Free Cash Flow13477306-126435397159-220

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days4134403331353633
Inventory Days839411110890909298
Days Payable4050574840404646
Cash Conversion Cycle8577939382868385
Working Capital Days6749535160524137
ROCE %23221620191612

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters282833333333333333333333
FIIs252424242222211918171717
DIIs171815151515151416171715
Public313027292931323433333335
No. of Shareholders5,60,9875,52,8945,63,8716,62,4287,34,1518,07,6578,62,0598,71,5848,49,2228,20,4608,09,1448,18,619

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year -27.7% (₹997.70 → ₹721.00)Brick size ₹18.72 (fixed)Bricks 67
₹800₹900₹1,000₹721Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26Jul '26Sep '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹721.00 on 9 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

exports as % of revenue

5.00

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

35.06inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-03-31

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)

1,25,88,368inr

2026-03-31

News

News and filings about Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

Uses as raw material

  • lead and lead alloys
  • lithium-ion cells and cell components for battery packs
  • nickel, manganese, cobalt and graphite-bearing lithium cell cathode/anode materials
  • polypropylene / plastic battery containers and components
  • used lead-acid batteries / battery scrap (recycling feedstock)

Depends on the price of

  • sulphuric_acid

Buys from

Sells to

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Automobile and Auto Components
Industry
Auto Components & Equipments
Classification
Automobile and Auto Components › Auto Components & Equipments
ISIN
INE885A01032

Business segments

  • Lead acid batteries and allied products · 94%
  • New energy business · 6%

Plants

  • Amara Raja Giga Corridor Gigafactory & Battery Pack Assembly Plant
  • Amara Raja Growth Corridor (ARGC) (4-Wheeler, 2-Wheeler, Tubular, MVRLA plants)
  • Amara Raja lead-acid battery recycling plant (Circular Solutions)
  • Karakambadi Battery Complex (4-Wheeler, 2-Wheeler, LVRLA plants)

News impact

Big market events that reach Amara Raja Energy & Mobility Limited, and how the effect spreads.

Who it hits first

  • Switch Mobility, the electric-bus unit of truck and bus maker Ashok Leyland, won an order for 840 electric buses for Delhi under PM E-Drive.
  • The order covers 420 nine-metre and 420 twelve-metre air-conditioned electric buses, placed via Antony Road Transport Solutions for the Delhi Transport Corporation.

Who may gain

  • Ashok Leyland shareholders, whose e-bus unit gains 840 buses of order inflow
  • Battery and parts suppliers to Ashok Leyland, which could see small follow-on orders for batteries, electrical parts, and suspension

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream, Antony Road Transport Solutions places the order and the Delhi Transport Corporation deploys the 840 buses for public transport in Delhi.

Upstream

Upstream, Ashok Leyland's suppliers of batteries, electrical parts, forgings, tyres, and steel stand to feed the 840-bus build, though each supplier's share is small.

Where demand moves

Business

New business demand flows to Switch Mobility and Ashok Leyland for 840 electric buses, with a thin trickle to battery, electrical, and suspension suppliers; rival bus makers win nothing from this round.

Capital

Capital flow should favour Ashok Leyland shares modestly on the order news, with light sympathy buying in e-bus suppliers and mild pressure on rival bus makers that missed out.

How it spreads across sectors

Automobile and Auto Components

Mild positive readthrough for e-bus and EV suppliers on the 840-bus Delhi order, while rival commercial-vehicle makers see a small competitive miss; the wider auto sector is unaffected.

When it plays out

Immediate

In 1–7 days Ashok Leyland shares react to the 840-bus win while rivals and suppliers adjust modestly.

Medium term

In 1–6 months execution and any follow-on Delhi e-bus lots decide whether this win grows into a bigger order book.

Short term

In 1–4 weeks focus shifts to delivery timelines, pricing, and margins on the 420 nine-metre and 420 twelve-metre buses.

5 Sept, 04:29 IST · Market event · medium impact

Central Electricity Authority draft would make co-located battery storage of at least 10% of capacity mandatory for solar and wind projects commissioned from July 2027, rising to four-hour duration by 2029-31

India's power regulator wants every new solar and wind farm to come with its own batteries so the electricity can be stored and released when needed - which costs developers more to build but creates a large new market for battery and grid-equipment makers.

PowerCapital GoodsMetals & Mining

Who it hits first

  • Every developer of new solar and wind capacity in India - NTPC Green, Adani Green, ACME Solar, JSW Energy, Tata Power and their unlisted peers - would have to buy and install batteries worth at least 10% of project capacity
  • Project cost per megawatt rises, which changes bid tariffs on every tender awarded from now on for projects commissioning after July 2027

Who may gain

  • Battery, power-conversion-system and grid-forming inverter makers such as HBL Engineering, Amara Raja and Exide, who gain a compulsory rather than optional market
  • Electrical equipment makers supplying switchyards, transformers and protection systems for the additional battery yards
  • Developers that already own storage capability or manufacture the equipment, notably Tata Power and JSW Energy

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Distribution companies and the grid operator get firmer, more predictable renewable supply, which reduces their need to buy expensive evening peak power and lowers the amount of thermal capacity they must keep on standby.

Upstream

Lithium cells, battery management systems, thermal management, enclosures, power conversion systems and grid-forming inverters all see step-change demand; most cells are still imported, so this widens India's battery import bill until domestic cell capacity from Amara Raja, Exide and others ramps up.

Where demand moves

Business

The rule creates demand that does not exist today: batteries equal to 10% of every new solar and wind project, stepping up to four-hour duration for 2029-31 commissioning. That demand flows first to cell and pack suppliers and power-conversion-system makers, then to the electrical balance-of-plant chain - switchgear, transformers, protection relays, cabling - and then to civil contractors building the battery yards. Working the other way, demand is destroyed for diesel and gas peaking capacity, because stored solar power displaces the expensive evening top-up generation the grid buys today.

Capital

Money should rotate from pure renewable developers, whose capex per megawatt rises before tariffs catch up, towards the equipment makers who capture that spend as revenue; because this is a draft under consultation until 4 October, the rotation is likely to be gradual and to reverse partially if the requirement is diluted in the final notification.

How it spreads across sectors

Capital Goods

battery, inverter, switchgear and transformer makers gain a compulsory new order stream

Metals & Mining

lithium, nickel, copper and aluminium content per megawatt of renewable capacity rises materially

Power

renewable developers absorb higher capex up front but win firmer, better-priced dispatchable tariffs later; thermal peaking economics weaken

codex additions

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

  • Mandatory co-located storage from July 2027
  • Renewable project capex per megawatt rises about 10-15%
  • Battery, power-conversion-system and grid-forming inverter demand steps up
  • Firm dispatchable renewable supply displaces evening peaking generation
  • Thermal peaking and diesel backup economics weaken over the medium term

Pattern name

Energy Transition Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Power
  • Capital Goods
  • Metals & Mining
  • Automobile and Auto Components

When it plays out

Immediate

Battery and grid-equipment names get a sentiment lift; developers face a modest cost overhang, but nothing binds until the rule is notified.

Medium term

If notified as drafted, every renewable tender bid from 2027 carries storage in the tariff, and the 2029-31 four-hour step creates a second, larger order wave.

Short term

The comment window closes on 4 October - watch developer associations lobbying to dilute the 10% requirement or push out the July 2027 date.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Mandatory co-located BESS raises domestic demand for cells, battery packs, thermal management, enclosures and battery-management systems beyond EV demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["EXIDEIND","ARE\u0026M","HBLPOWER"],"magnitude":"large","notes":"Benefit strongest if developers prefer domestic sourcing or PLI-linked suppliers. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Battery manufacturing / auto ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"More battery installations increase demand for electrolyte salts, solvents, binders, separators, fluorochemicals and other battery-grade chemicals.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","SRF","FLUOROCHEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Link depends on how much of the battery supply chain localizes in India versus imported cells/packs. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Specialty chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher renewable project capex increases debt requirement, refinancing needs and structured lending for hybrid renewable-plus-storage assets.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["PFC","RECLTD","IREDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Credit risk may also rise for weaker developers if tariffs do not compensate for storage capex. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Financial services / project finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"BESS co-location requires extra civil works, switchyards, protection systems, evacuation upgrades and grid-interface engineering at renewable sites.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","KEC","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Some benefit overlaps with capital goods, but construction and grid-integration EPC are separate ripple channels. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Infrastructure construction / transmission EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Storage mandates increase need for forecasting, energy-management systems, SCADA integration, grid-forming controls, dispatch optimization and digital O\u0026M.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","LTTS","KPITTECH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More likely a second-order benefit through utilities, OEMs and renewable operators than a direct revenue shock. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"IT services / energy software","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"BESS containers, imported cells, power electronics and heavy electrical equipment raise project cargo movement through ports, roads and container logistics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on import share and pace of project ordering before the July 2027 cutoff. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Logistics / ports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Co-located batteries add fire, thermal runaway, warranty, business interruption and performance-risk exposure, increasing need for project insurance and risk engineering.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ICICIGI","GICRE","NIACL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Premium opportunity may be partly offset by higher underwriting caution for BESS-heavy assets. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Insurance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"More grid-scale storage can reduce future reliance on gas or liquid-fuel peaking and backup generation, though gas may still be used for longer-duration balancing.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["GAIL","PETRONET","IGL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for long-term peaking-fuel optionality; neutral to mildly positive if gas remains a complement for multi-hour or seasonal balancing. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Oil \u0026 gas / gas utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Additional BESS yards, foundations, control rooms, roads, fencing and substations modestly increase construction-material intensity per renewable project.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","AMBUJACEM","JKCEMENT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"A diffuse third-order effect, but defensible for large solar and wind parks adding storage infrastructure. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Cement and building materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

28 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact

India readies a Rs 13,000 crore incentive scheme for advanced battery cell components - anode and cathode materials, electrolytes, separator film and copper foil - to close the cost gap with China

The government plans Rs 13,000 crore of subsidies to make battery parts in India instead of importing them from China, which over time makes electric vehicles cheaper to build and helps Indian battery and chemical makers.

Automobile and Auto ComponentsChemicalsMetals & MiningCapital Goods

Who it hits first

  • Listed battery makers Exide Industries and Amara Raja Energy & Mobility would get cheaper domestic supply of the five subsidised cell inputs
  • Electric vehicle makers including Ola Electric would see their largest cost item fall over time
  • The scheme is still pre-approval, sitting with the Expenditure Finance Committee, so nothing changes commercially yet

Who may gain

  • Speciality chemical makers that could produce electrolytes and cathode precursors
  • Copper processors, since copper foil is one of the five covered components
  • Capital goods suppliers that build the plants, as new component lines are ordered

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Cell makers get cheaper inputs, which passes into lower pack costs for electric two-wheelers, cars and grid storage; energy-storage developers and electric vehicle makers are the eventual beneficiaries, though only after component plants are actually built, which is a multi-year lag.

Upstream

Lithium, cobalt, nickel and graphite sourcing becomes the next bottleneck since the scheme covers processing rather than mining; speciality chemical makers gain a route into electrolyte and cathode precursor supply, and copper producers gain a foil customer base that currently buys from China.

Where demand moves

Business

Demand shifts away from Chinese component imports and towards whichever Indian firms build qualifying capacity, and that new domestic component demand flows upstream into speciality chemicals, copper rolling and plant equipment. Cell makers capture the cost saving first and electric vehicle makers capture it second, once cheaper cells reach them.

Capital

Money rotates towards the clearest direct beneficiaries with real profitability rather than towards every name with a battery association. The March 2024 policy precedent shows the split sharply: genuine beneficiaries held their gains while richly valued sub-scale assemblers faded within a month.

How it spreads across sectors

Automobile and Auto Components

Battery and cell makers gain a cost advantage; electric vehicle economics improve with a lag

Capital Goods

Component plant equipment orders

Chemicals

An electrolyte and cathode precursor opportunity opens for speciality chemical makers

Metals & Mining

Copper foil demand creates a new domestic customer base

codex additions

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

  • Battery component subsidy proposed
  • Domestic cell input cost falls
  • Cell and pack costs decline
  • Electric vehicle and grid storage economics improve
  • Thermal and oil demand faces a longer-term structural headwind

Pattern name

Energy Transition Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Automobile and Auto Components
  • Chemicals
  • Metals & Mining
  • Capital Goods

When it plays out

Immediate

Sentiment-driven moves in battery and electric vehicle names on the headline, with no commercial change

Medium term

Component plants take two to three years to build, so cost benefits reach cell and vehicle makers from 2028 onwards

Short term

Expenditure Finance Committee review and cabinet approval determine whether the scheme is real; eligibility thresholds decide who qualifies

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Localized battery component incentives -\u003e lower battery storage costs over time -\u003e faster grid-scale storage adoption for renewable balancing and peak management -\u003e higher capex and storage-linked tender activity for utilities and transmission players","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","TATAPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Policy improves economics for stationary storage, though benefits depend on actual cell and pack cost pass-through.","sector":"Power Utilities and Grid Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Cheaper domestic battery inputs -\u003e better economics for solar-plus-storage and round-the-clock renewable projects -\u003e improved bidding competitiveness and project pipeline visibility","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIGREEN","JSWENERGY","SJVN"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Storage cost decline supports firm renewable power contracts and hybrid tenders.","sector":"Renewable Energy Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Battery component localization scheme -\u003e new manufacturing plants and working-capital needs -\u003e higher project finance, capex lending and supply-chain credit demand","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Credit demand is plausible but depends on project approvals, promoter quality and subsidy disbursement clarity.","sector":"Banks and Infrastructure Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Incentives for anode, cathode, electrolyte, separator and copper foil plants -\u003e demand for compliant industrial land, warehousing, hazardous-material storage and manufacturing clusters -\u003e benefit to logistics park and industrial asset operators","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","MAHLOG","TCI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Ripple is indirect but defensible as battery supply chains require specialized storage and regional clustering.","sector":"Industrial Real Estate and Logistics Parks","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Domestic component manufacturing ramp-up -\u003e higher imports of precursor minerals, equipment and intermediate chemicals plus domestic movement of battery materials -\u003e volume upside for ports and logistics operators","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Even import substitution can initially raise inbound volumes of raw materials and machinery.","sector":"Ports, Shipping and Multimodal Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Battery cost curve improves -\u003e EV adoption becomes more economical over time -\u003e long-run pressure on petrol and diesel demand growth, partly offset by EV charging opportunities","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative fuel-demand effect is gradual; near-term impact may be muted and charging infrastructure can create partial offsets.","sector":"Oil Marketing and Fuel Retail","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Lower battery input costs -\u003e faster EV and stationary-storage deployment -\u003e higher demand for chargers, inverters, converters, BMS-adjacent electronics and grid interface equipment","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ABB","SIEMENS","CGPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefits accrue to firms supplying electrification, automation and grid-interface hardware.","sector":"Power Electronics and EV Charging Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Localized advanced battery components -\u003e improved domestic cell ecosystem -\u003e lower sourcing risk and eventual cost benefits for battery-powered appliances, backup systems, wearables and electronics assembly","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DIXON","VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More second-order than EVs, but reduced battery import dependence can support electronics localization.","sector":"Consumer Durables and Electronics Manufacturing","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Expansion of domestic battery cell and component ecosystem -\u003e larger future battery scrap and process waste streams -\u003e demand for recycling, material recovery and environmental compliance services","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["GRAVITA","ECORECO","PONDYOXIDE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is back-ended but policy strengthens the case for circular battery-material supply chains.","sector":"Recycling and Waste Management","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Domestic cathode and anode material incentives -\u003e increased demand for lithium, graphite, nickel, manganese and related mineral processing capability -\u003e strategic push for domestic beneficiation and overseas mineral linkages","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NMDC","MOIL","HINDZINC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"India lacks large-scale reserves for some battery minerals, so benefits are more likely in beneficiation, partnerships and selected minerals.","sector":"Mining and Mineral Beneficiation","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

5 Aug, 04:36 IST · Market event · medium impact

Tata's battery arm Agratas gives up on a Chinese technology licence and will build lithium cells on its own process at Sanand, as Beijing's export curbs harden

China has effectively stopped selling battery-making know-how to Indian firms, so Tata is now developing its own — which is slower and dearer, keeps electric vehicles costly for longer, and puts Indian battery makers who license Chinese technology, like Exide, in an awkward spot.

Automobile and Auto ComponentsCapital GoodsPower

Who it hits first

  • Agratas will build lithium iron phosphate cells at Sanand using process technology it develops itself, because it concluded no Chinese firm will license it under Beijing's export restrictions. Developing a cell process from scratch means low yields for longer and a higher cost per kilowatt-hour than a licensed line would deliver.
  • Exide Energy Solutions is the most directly exposed listed company, because its lithium cell plan runs on a licence from China's SVOLT — the exact channel being closed.
  • Amara Raja licenses Gotion technology through an EU-domiciled entity, GIB EnergyX Slovakia, which is a partial shield, but it has already delayed cell production to FY2027.

Who may gain

  • Japanese, Korean and European technology licensors, whose licences remain available — Agratas' nickel-manganese-cobalt line already runs on technology from Japan's Automotive Energy Supply Corp, proving the non-Chinese route works.
  • Battery makers with no Chinese dependency at all, such as HBL Engineering, whose railway, defence and industrial chemistries are its own.
  • Indian engineering and research-and-development service firms, who get paid to help develop the process knowledge that is no longer available off the shelf.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream are the electric vehicle makers and grid-storage developers who were promised cheap domestic cells. Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles is Agratas' anchor customer and keeps importing cells for longer. Ather Energy and Ola Electric, who buy cells rather than make them, face the same extended import dependence. Grid-scale storage developers such as Tata Power bid fixed tariffs years before buying batteries, so a delayed domestic cell industry lands directly on their project margins.

Upstream

Upstream of an Indian cell plant sit three things China has restricted: the process licence, the manufacturing equipment, and the engineers who commission it. Agratas is working around all three by assembling a mixed Indian, South Korean and Chinese engineering team and developing its own recipe. Further upstream sit the cathode and anode materials — lithium iron phosphate powder, graphite anode, electrolyte and separator — which remain overwhelmingly Chinese-supplied and are the next obvious pressure point.

Where demand moves

Business

Demand for cell technology has been forced to re-route. It cannot flow to China, so it flows either to Japanese, Korean and European licensors, or to in-house development teams. The same re-routing hits equipment: electrode coaters, calendering machines and dry-room systems now have to be sourced outside China, which lengthens delivery times and raises capital cost per gigawatt-hour. Downstream, electric-vehicle makers keep importing finished cells for longer than planned, so demand that was supposed to become domestic stays offshore for another two to three years.

Capital

Capital is separating the cell-makers from the cell-buyers. Money should favour companies with non-Chinese technology paths or no cell dependency at all — HBL Engineering, and the engineering-services firms Codex flagged — and shy away from those whose entire investment case rests on a Chinese licence, principally Exide. On 4 August the market had not yet made this distinction: Exide rose 3.07% and Ather jumped 13.96%, both on company-specific results news rather than on this structural story, which is precisely why it is not yet in the price.

How it spreads across sectors

Automobile and Auto Components

The electric-vehicle cost curve stays higher for longer and import dependence persists, weighing most on companies whose investment case assumes cheap domestic cells.

Capital Goods

Battery equipment, dry-room and electrode-machinery orders shift from Chinese to Korean, Japanese and European suppliers, raising capital cost per gigawatt-hour.

Power

Grid-scale battery storage tenders carry more cell supply and price risk, squeezing developers who bid fixed tariffs years in advance.

codex additions

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

  • China restricts cell technology export
  • Indian cell localisation slows and gets dearer
  • EV cost parity pushed out 2-3 years
  • Imported cell dependence persists
  • Grid-storage tender economics tighten

Pattern name

Energy Transition Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Automobile and Auto Components
  • Capital Goods
  • Power

When it plays out

Immediate

Little immediate price action — this is a strategy disclosure, not an earnings event. Watch for any statement from Exide or Amara Raja clarifying whether their Chinese licences are affected, which is the question that matters most.

Medium term

Over one to six months the real test is Agratas' pilot line yields at Sanand. If a self-developed lithium iron phosphate process reaches commercial yields, it becomes a template other Indian firms can follow and the whole sector re-rates. If it does not, India's cell localisation slips several years, electric-vehicle price parity is pushed out, and the cathode and electrolyte materials chain — still overwhelmingly Chinese — becomes the next chokepoint.

Short term

Over one to four weeks, expect analyst questions on licence security at both Exide and Amara Raja, and possible commentary on equipment delivery schedules. Any confirmation that a Chinese licensor cannot ship equipment or engineers would be the trigger that turns this from a background risk into a priced one.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"China technology curbs force domestic LFP process development -\u003e Indian cell makers need localized cathode/anode/electrolyte/binder supply qualification -\u003e higher demand for specialty chemicals, fluorochemicals and battery-material intermediates, but with longer validation cycles","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","FLUOROCHEM","AETHER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Positive for credible battery-material suppliers; negative where delayed cell ramps defer volume offtake.","sector":"Chemicals and Battery Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"LFP localization reduces reliance on nickel/cobalt-heavy NMC chemistry -\u003e relative demand tilts toward lithium, iron and phosphate chains -\u003e Indian metal and mineral processors tied to battery inputs may see strategic interest, while nickel/cobalt exposure is less favored","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HINDALCO","VEDL","NMDC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"The NSE read-through is indirect because India has limited listed pure-play lithium exposure.","sector":"Metals and Mining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Slower domestic cell maturity keeps battery packs dependent on imported cells -\u003e more value capture shifts temporarily to pack assembly, BMS, power electronics and localization of non-cell components","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["KAYNES","SYRMA","DIXON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Beneficiaries are firms positioned in electronics assembly, control systems and EV/industrial electronics.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Longer import dependence for cells and critical battery equipment -\u003e sustained containerized imports from Korea, Japan, Europe and non-China Asian hubs -\u003e higher handling, warehousing and project-cargo activity","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude is limited because battery imports are one stream within broader cargo volumes.","sector":"Logistics and Ports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Domestic cell pilot and gigafactory validation require dry rooms, nitrogen, argon, clean utilities and process gases -\u003e slower but more iterative process development can increase testing and commissioning intensity","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LINDEINDIA","INOXINDIA","GUJGA S"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant to suppliers around Gujarat industrial clusters and clean manufacturing infrastructure.","sector":"Industrial Gases and Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Loss of Chinese process-technology transfer raises need for in-house manufacturing software, simulation, yield analytics, automation, digital twins and engineering validation -\u003e higher demand for ER\u0026D and industrial digital services","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LTTS","KPITTECH","TATAELXSI"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"KPIT/Tata Elxsi read-through is strongest through EV platforms and battery-management software rather than cell chemistry itself.","sector":"Information Technology and Engineering R\u0026D Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Grid-scale storage remains costlier or more import-dependent -\u003e renewable-plus-storage bids face higher tariff assumptions and execution risk -\u003e standalone solar/wind projects may be less affected than round-the-clock renewable projects","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPCGREEN","SUZLON","INOXWIND"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Negative for storage-heavy renewable tenders; neutral to mildly positive for non-storage renewable capacity if batteries remain scarce.","sector":"Renewable Energy and Solar EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"If EV battery cost declines are delayed, mass-market EV adoption can slow at the margin -\u003e petrol/diesel/CNG demand erosion is deferred -\u003e fuel retailers and gas distributors get a modest demand cushion","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","IGL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order hedge effect, not a direct operational catalyst.","sector":"Oil Marketing and City Gas","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher EV acquisition costs and uncertain residual values slow EV penetration in some segments -\u003e lenders may prefer ICE/hybrid financing or demand tighter terms for EV fleets -\u003e loan mix, risk pricing and fleet-credit exposure shift","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BAJFINANCE","M\u0026MFIN","CHOLAFIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Mixed because slower EV adoption can protect existing ICE loan books but reduce growth in newer EV financing pools.","sector":"Financials and NBFC Auto Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Who it hits first

  • EV/e-bus and Li-ion cell makers face input-cost inflation: OLAELEC (cells ~31.7% of cost), OLECTRA, JBMA, EXICOM, PACEDIGITK (cells ~54% of cost)
  • Lithium-chemical processors NEOGEN (carbonate/hydroxide) and INDOBORAX see feedstock cost up with partial pass-through to realizations
  • Battery maker ARE&M (Amara Raja) sees Li-ion gigafactory ramp-cost pressure, partly offset by its legacy lead-acid base

Who may gain

  • Lead-acid / non-lithium battery incumbents (ARE&M legacy, EXIDEIND, HBLPOWER) if a widening Li-ion cost gap slows EV substitution
  • ICE two-wheeler OEMs (HEROMOTOCO, BAJAJ-AUTO) on relative demand if EV payback worsens
  • Lithium-resource optionality plays (NMDC, MOIL, HINDZINC) on critical-mineral sentiment

Along the supply chain

Downstream

EV OEMs and e-bus assemblers (OLAELEC, OLECTRA, JBMA) and charger/BESS makers (EXICOM, SERVOTECH) face higher cell costs; end EV buyers see slower price declines, delaying adoption and pressuring volume growth.

Upstream

Lithium ore/brine is imported with no domestic mining cushion, so carbonate/hydroxide cost inflation passes straight through to Indian cell makers; lithium-compound refiners (NEOGEN, INDOBORAX) see higher realizations but also higher feedstock cost.

Where demand moves

Business

Sustained lithium-cost inflation raises Li-ion cell prices, compressing EV/e-bus and battery-assembler margins (OLAELEC, OLECTRA, JBMA, EXICOM); some demand rotates to lead-acid incumbents (ARE&M legacy, EXIDEIND) and ICE two-wheelers if EV payback periods lengthen.

Capital

Capital rotates away from cash-burning EV pure-plays (OLAELEC, EXICOM) toward profitable, lower-valuation battery/cell names (PACEDIGITK, ARE&M) and lithium-materials optionality plays; momentum money in richly-valued EV names (OLECTRA PE 69, JBMA PE 73) is most exposed to a de-rating.

How it spreads across sectors

Automobile and Auto Components

EV/e-bus margin pressure and slower EV adoption pace

Capital Goods

EV-charger and BESS product cost up (segment-dependent)

Chemicals

lithium-compound feedstock cost inflation with uncertain pass-through

codex additions

  • Power Utilities & Renewable Energy: costlier BESS weakens grid-storage economics (mixed)
  • Oil Marketing & Refining: slower EV adoption modestly supports fuel demand (positive, small)
  • Two-Wheeler ICE OEMs: relative demand support if EV payback worsens (positive)
  • Non-Lithium Battery Tech (lead-acid/sodium-ion): improved relative economics (positive)
  • Mining & Mineral Exploration: critical-mineral optionality sentiment (positive, small)

Commodity angle

Commodity

lithium (Li-ion cell materials)

Price note

Neo4j Commodity nodes for lithium are unpriced and fragmented across 40+ node variants; the article gives no confirmed % move (analyst opinion only). Commodity prices stale — using article-reported qualitative uptrend; margin_impact_bps not numerically computable.

Shock type

price_trend

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

  • Lithium uptrend -> Li-ion cell cost up -> EV/e-bus margin pressure & slower EV price declines
  • Relative support for lead-acid / ICE two-wheelers
  • Lithium-materials capex optionality (NEOGEN, mining)

Pattern name

Energy Transition Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Automobile and Auto Components
  • Chemicals
  • Capital Goods
  • Telecommunication

When it plays out

Immediate

Analyst-opinion headline; limited immediate price reaction beyond sentiment on EV pure-plays

Medium term

If lithium uptrend sustains, EV/cell-maker margin pressure and slower EV price declines; relative support for lead-acid and ICE; lithium-materials capex optionality

Short term

Watch lithium spot/contract prints and EV-maker commentary on cell-cost guidance

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Higher lithium lifts BESS costs -\u003e grid-scale storage economics weaken -\u003e renewable-plus-storage bids face higher tariffs/delays","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","TATAPOWER","JSWENERGY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Negative for storage-heavy renewable economics; positive for firm power if storage adoption slows.","sector":"Power Utilities and Renewable Energy","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Costlier batteries slow distributed storage -\u003e grid balancing leans on T\u0026D upgrades","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["POWERGRID","KALPATARU","KEC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Indirect but defensible.","sector":"Power Transmission and Grid Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher lithium raises EV prices -\u003e EV payback worsens -\u003e fuel-demand erosion slows","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["IOC","BPCL","HINDPETRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Limited by early EV penetration.","sector":"Oil Marketing and Refining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Battery cost inflation pressures e-scooter pricing -\u003e consumers defer EV or choose petrol -\u003e ICE incumbents gain relative demand","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["HEROMOTOCO","BAJAJ-AUTO","TVSMOTOR"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"TVS/Bajaj have EV exposure so net is mixed for them.","sector":"Two-Wheeler ICE OEMs","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher EV cost -\u003e larger tickets but weaker affordability/residual-value confidence","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["M\u0026MFIN","BAJFINANCE","CHOLAFIN"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for EV-fleet lenders if utilization weakens.","sector":"Auto Finance and NBFCs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Higher battery prices raise EV fleet capex -\u003e electrification savings shrink","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["ZOMATO","DELHIVERY","BLUEDART"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Mostly indirect via fleet partners.","sector":"Urban Mobility, Logistics and Delivery Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Costlier storage delays battery-backed renewable substitution -\u003e firm thermal stays relevant for balancing","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["COALINDIA","NTPC","NLCINDIA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Relative/timing benefit, not structural reversal.","sector":"Thermal Power and Coal Value Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Lithium rally improves relative economics of sodium-ion/zinc/advanced lead-acid","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["AMARAJABAT","EXIDEIND","HBLPOWER"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Depends on commercial readiness; lead-acid gains in backup niches.","sector":"Non-Lithium Battery Technologies","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Battery packs are major BOM in devices/portable power -\u003e higher cell cost compresses EMS margins","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["DIXON","KAYNES","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Larger where pass-through is slow.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Sustained high lithium incentivizes domestic critical-mineral exploration/auctions/tie-ups","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["NMDC","MOIL","HINDZINC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Limited listed pure-play exposure; sentiment/optionality.","sector":"Mining and Mineral Exploration","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

27 Jul 2026unspecified₹5.2
13 Nov 2025interim₹5.4
1 Aug 2025unspecified₹5.2
14 Nov 2024interim₹5.3
18 Jul 2024unspecified₹5.1
10 Nov 2023interim₹4.8
28 Jul 2023unspecified₹3.2
15 Nov 2022interim₹2.9

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 5 rows from NSE's archive (replace 0, delete 0, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
  • nse-rename-history fill: 1930 NSE bars before cutoff, ISIN INE885A01032@2016-01-01, symbols AMARAJABAT (docs/nse_rename_history.md)1× · 18 Oct 2023

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.