Bikaji Foods International Limited
NSE: BIKAJIPackaged Foods
Share price
₹472.05
+0.73% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 7 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
76
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹11,801 Cr
P/E ratio
45.2
P/B ratio
7.4
ROCE
19.8%
ROE
17.5%
Dividend yield
0.3%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 13.9% over the past year, and 16.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 8.4% to 13.4% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 16.0% a year against a sector median of 9.9% — 6.1 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 44.9× earnings it costs 1.9× the market, which pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 43.8×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 75.7×, the 0th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 1.9 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 24%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bikaji Foods International Limited — this one | 24%/yr | 44.9× | ₹1.9 |
| Nestle India | — | 68.7× | — |
| Britannia Industries | 8%/yr | 43.8× | ₹5.5 |
| Zydus Wellness Limited | -10%/yr | 71.8× | — |
| The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited | 31%/yr | 6.9× | ₹0.22 |
| Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited | 16%/yr | 42.2× | ₹2.6 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Packaged Foods), it ranks 6 of 20 on returns, 6 of 20 on growth, 8 of 20 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A narrow advantage: it earns 19.8% on capital, ahead of 70% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹970 crore of cash from the business and spent ₹617 crore on plant and equipment, with ₹353 crore to spare; it still raised ₹55 crore mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹160 crore to ₹299 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 7 years, about 107 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 14 days for its cash to waiting 21 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
9 of 9 checks clear · 100%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Sales grew 12.5% with volumes up 7.7%, and a 13-13.5% profit-margin target was set for the year
Announced 5 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹734 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+12.4%
Revenue vs last quarter
+1.8%
Net profit
₹59 Cr
Profit vs last year
+0.8%
Profit vs last quarter
+6.2%
Net margin
8.1%
EPS
₹2.40
Earnings call transcript · 6 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹11,801 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹472.05
- 52w High
- ₹769
- 52w Low
- ₹465
- Enterprise value
- ₹11,760 Cr
- Beta
- 0.6
- Price CAGR 1y
- -34.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 1.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- —
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 11.4%
- PEG ratio
- 1.9
- P/E ratio
- 45.2
- P/B ratio
- 7.4
- EV / EBITDA
- 28.5
- Industry P/E
- 43.5
- ROCE
- 19.8%
- ROCE 5y average
- 19.6%
- ROE
- 17.5%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.2
- Interest coverage
- 20.2
- Dividend yield
- 0.3%
- ROE 3y average
- 19.0%
- ROE last year
- 17.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹2,994 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹254 Cr
- Operating margin
- 14.0%
- Net profit margin
- 8.5%
- EBITDA margin
- 13.7%
- Sales growth 3y
- 15.1%
- Sales growth 5y
- 18.0%
- Profit growth 3y
- 24.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 24.0%
- EPS
- ₹10.3
- Sales growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 29.0%
- Dividend payout
- 12.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹734 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹59 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 12.5%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 0.0%
- OPM latest quarter
- 13.5%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹64.3
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹299 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹316 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹299 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 63.3
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹304 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹127 Cr
- FCF yield
- 0.9%
- Net cash flow
- ₹15 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 73.9%
- FII holding
- 4.6%
- DII holding
- 17.5%
- Public holding
- 4.0%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nestle India | 1,324.00 | 68.3 | 2,56,456 | 0.91 | 975.1 | 48.6 | 6,378.2 | 25.2 | 84.1 |
| Britannia Inds. | 4,780.00 | 44.2 | 1,15,107 | 1.89 | 593.4 | 13.6 | 5,000.0 | 8.2 | 56.0 |
| Zydus Wellness | 507.55 | 72.7 | 16,097 | 0.24 | 118.9 | -7.0 | 1,437.0 | 66.9 | 4.9 |
| Bikaji Foods | 483.55 | 46.4 | 12,133 | 0.26 | 59.5 | 0.4 | 734.3 | 12.5 | 19.8 |
| The Bombay Burmah | 1,269.40 | 7.1 | 8,845 | 1.34 | 582.7 | 17.5 | 5,088.7 | 8.0 | 33.0 |
| Mrs Bectors | 211.07 | 50.1 | 6,477 | 0.62 | 35.3 | 41.8 | 507.1 | 15.7 | 12.9 |
| ADF Foods | 291.70 | 33.2 | 3,210 | 0.41 | 17.3 | 13.4 | 167.3 | 25.9 | 21.8 |
| Gopal Snacks | 255.40 | 58.0 | 3,186 | 0.39 | 12.9 | 431.0 | 422.3 | 31.1 | 11.7 |
| Median | 250.20 | 44.9 | 722 | 0.04 | 9.3 | 23.0 | 139.8 | 15.7 | 14.0 |
Competes with: ADF Foods Limited, Annapurna Swadisht Limited, Britannia Industries, Dangee Dums Limited, Euro India Fresh Foods Limited, Foods & Inns Limited, Ganesh Consumer Products Limited, Gopal Snacks Limited, Hexagon Nutrition Limited, Lotus Chocolate Company Limited, Milky Mist Dairy Food Limited, Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited, Nakoda Group of Industries Limited, Nestle India, Palash Securities Limited, Prataap Snacks Limited, Sundrop Brands Limited, Tasty Bite Eatables Limited, The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, Zydus Wellness Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 482 | 609 | 624 | 614 | 572 | 721 | 715 | 611 | 653 | 830 | 790 | 721 | 734 |
| Expenses | 416 | 521 | 549 | 453 | 480 | 614 | 659 | 537 | 556 | 702 | 692 | 633 | 635 |
| Material Cost | 389 | 405 | 544 | 486 | 445 | 482 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | -3.99 | -5.29 | -27 | 14 | 13 | -16 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 23 | 25 | 23 | 16 | 6.12 | 6.46 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 41 | 45 | 53 | 52 | 49 | 54 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 90 | 87 | 110 | 124 | 120 | 110 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | 66 | 88 | 75 | 161 | 92 | 107 | 55 | 74 | 96 | 128 | 98 | 88 | 99 |
| OPM % | 14 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 16 | 15 | 7.76 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 12 | 12 | 13 |
| Other Income | 6 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 18 | 13 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | -4.35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Depreciation | 13 | 16 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 19 | 21 | 25 | 23 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 26 |
| Profit before tax | 56 | 75 | 62 | 155 | 78 | 93 | 39 | 55 | 79 | 107 | 82 | 77 | 81 |
| Tax % | 26 | 20 | 26 | 25 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 27 | 26 | 28 | 24 | 28 | 26 |
| Net Profit | 41 | 60 | 46 | 116 | 58 | 69 | 28 | 40 | 59 | 78 | 62 | 56 | 59 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.67 | 2.45 | 1.86 | 4.64 | 2.33 | 2.76 | 1.14 | 1.78 | 2.39 | 3.18 | 2.48 | 2.25 | 2.40 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 1.78 | 2.39 | 3.18 | 2.48 | 2.24 | 2.40 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 1,075 | 1,311 | 1,611 | 1,966 | 2,329 | 2,617 | 2,994 | 3,075 |
| Expenses | 979 | 1,166 | 1,471 | 1,752 | 1,937 | 2,287 | 2,583 | 2,662 |
| Material Cost | 1,676 | 1,879 | ||||||
| Change in Inventories | -8.80 | -4.24 | ||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 107 | 69 | ||||||
| Employee Cost | 159 | 198 | ||||||
| Other Expenses | 360 | 441 | ||||||
| Operating Profit | 96 | 145 | 140 | 214 | 392 | 330 | 411 | 413 |
| OPM % | 9 | 11 | 9 | 11 | 17 | 13 | 14 | 13 |
| Other Income | 8 | 11 | 10 | 23 | 27 | 31 | 47 | 50 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | -4.35 | ||||||
| Interest | 6 | 3 | 7 | 11 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 18 |
| Depreciation | 34 | 33 | 38 | 49 | 60 | 82 | 95 | 98 |
| Profit before tax | 64 | 120 | 105 | 177 | 348 | 264 | 345 | 347 |
| Tax % | 11 | 25 | 28 | 23 | 24 | 27 | 26 | |
| Net Profit | 56 | 90 | 76 | 136 | 263 | 194 | 254 | 255 |
| EPS in Rs | 23 | 37 | 3.12 | 5.50 | 11 | 8.01 | 10 | 10 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 8.02 | 10 | ||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 9 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 12 | 12 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 18%
- 3 years
- 15%
- TTM
- 14%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 24%
- 3 years
- 24%
- TTM
- 29%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- —
- 3 years
- 1%
- 1 year
- -34%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 17%
- 3 years
- 19%
- Last year
- 17%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 24 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Reserves | 505 | 581 | 796 | 931 | 1,193 | 1,358 | 1,582 |
| Borrowings | 54 | 87 | 160 | 170 | 166 | 231 | 299 |
| Other Liabilities | 94 | 124 | 122 | 146 | 145 | 313 | 325 |
| Minority Interest | 97 | 100 | |||||
| Total Liabilities | 677 | 817 | 1,102 | 1,271 | 1,530 | 1,928 | 2,231 |
| Fixed Assets | 407 | 423 | 511 | 661 | 812 | 986 | 1,034 |
| CWIP | 3 | 36 | 49 | 70 | 12 | 98 | 151 |
| Investments | 36 | 69 | 126 | 20 | 31 | 56 | 44 |
| Other Assets | 230 | 290 | 416 | 520 | 674 | 787 | 1,002 |
| Total Assets | 677 | 817 | 1,102 | 1,271 | 1,530 | 1,934 | 2,240 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 55 | 117 | 57 | 171 | 245 | 193 | 304 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -58 | -114 | -232 | -123 | -199 | -122 | -289 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -26 | -9 | 169 | -5 | -54 | -55 | 0 |
| Net Cash Flow | -29 | -6 | -5 | 43 | -8 | 16 | 15 |
| Free Cash Flow | 14 | 43 | -50 | 86 | 118 | 72 | 127 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 14 | 13 | 17 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 13 |
| Inventory Days | 22 | 26 | 27 | 21 | 20 | 25 | 25 |
| Days Payable | 8 | 20 | 16 | 14 | 14 | 16 | 14 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 27 | 20 | 28 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| Working Capital Days | 7 | -4 | 14 | 19 | 16 | 29 | 21 |
| ROCE % | 19 | 13 | 18 | 29 | 18 | 20 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-40.82inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
92,67,027inr
2026-03-31
volume growth %
7.70pct
2026-06-30
News
News and filings about Bikaji Foods International Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
- ADF Foods Limited
- Annapurna Swadisht Limited
- Britannia Industries
- Dangee Dums Limited
- Euro India Fresh Foods Limited
- Foods & Inns Limited
- Ganesh Consumer Products Limited
- Gopal Snacks Limited
- Hexagon Nutrition Limited
- Lotus Chocolate Company Limited
- Milky Mist Dairy Food Limited
- Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited
- Nakoda Group of Industries Limited
- Nestle India
- Palash Securities Limited
- Prataap Snacks Limited
- Sundrop Brands Limited
- Tasty Bite Eatables Limited
- The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited
- Zydus Wellness Limited
Uses as raw material
- besan / gram flour (from chana dal)
- dry fruits
- milk & khoya
- packaging (multi-layer laminates, tin-plate cans, rigid containers, cartons)
- potatoes
- spices
Depends on the price of
- Palm Oil
Sells to
- ETERNAL LIMITED · Packaged snacks/sweets sold via Blinkit/Zomato quick-commerce
- Swiggy Limited · Packaged snacks/sweets sold via Swiggy Instamart quick-commerce
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Fast Moving Consumer Goods
- Industry
- Packaged Foods
- Classification
- Fast Moving Consumer Goods › Packaged Foods
- ISIN
- INE00E101023
Plants
- Bikaji Bichhwal Industrial Area plant, Bikaner
- Bikaji India Food Park plant, Guwahati
- Bikaji Karni Industrial Area plant, Bikaner
- Bikaji Muzaffarpur plant (Vindhyawasini Sales)
- Bikaji Tumakuru plant (Petunt Food Processors)
News impact
Big market events that reach Bikaji Foods International Limited, and how the effect spreads.
23 Sept, 22:02 IST · Market event · medium impact
Amazon, Instamart, BigBasket, Flipkart, Zepto Face Penal Action Over Happilo Dates, Dhatura Sales
India's food safety body is punishing quick-delivery apps and sellers over risky food listings, hurting Swiggy and dairy maker Milky Mist with fines and checks while offline stores may gain shoppers.
Who it hits first
- India's food safety authority (FSSAI) has named Amazon, Flipkart, Swiggy Instamart, Zepto and BigBasket in penal action over risky food listings.
- The flagged items include Happilo date bites, Milky Mist dairy products and Dhatura (a toxic plant) fruits and seeds.
- Named platforms face fines, delistings and tougher listing checks; among listed firms Swiggy (Instamart's owner) is directly hit.
- Milky Mist, a listed dairy maker whose items were flagged, faces brand and recall risk.
Who may gain
- Avenue Supermarts (DMart): shoppers worried about online food safety may shift to trusted offline stores.
- Bikaji Foods: a rival snack brand could gain shelf space if Happilo listings are pulled, partly offset by sector-wide scrutiny.
- Compliant food brands and testing labs: stricter checks reward clean supply chains.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, delivery riders and dark-store operators see fewer orders on delisted items, while shoppers gain safer listings at the cost of narrower choice.
Upstream
Upstream, snack and dairy suppliers to quick commerce, including Bikaji Foods (a pack-listed Swiggy supplier), face extra compliance checks and possible order pauses on flagged lines.
Where demand moves
Business
Grocery demand may leak from quick-commerce apps toward offline stores and compliant sellers while flagged listings are delisted and checks tighten.
Capital
Capital is likely to shun the directly named platforms and the flagged dairy brand short-term, favouring profitable offline retail and unaffected staples.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Negative for food-delivery and quick-commerce platforms via fines and compliance costs; neutral for travel, hotels and edtech.
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Negative for the flagged dairy brand; neutral-to-negative for packaged foods on wider FSSAI scrutiny; alcohol and personal care untouched.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
Pattern name
Crude Oil Cascade
Patterns
- Crude Oil Cascade
Sectors queried
- Cement
- Chemicals
- FMCG
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
Named platforms and Milky Mist slip as fines, delistings and inspection headlines dominate the next few days.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months compliance upgrades and restored listings decide whether the damage was a blip or a lasting cost.
Short term
Over 1-4 weeks the fine quantum and any listing bans set the size of the hit; peers stay under watch.
31 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · medium impact
FSSAI moves to mandate red-hexagon front-of-pack warning labels on high fat, salt and sugar packaged foods; separately bars Everest and LG brands from selling hing
India's food regulator wants a red warning hexagon on packets high in fat, salt or sugar. Biscuit, snack and packaged-dairy brands may have to change recipes or lose some sales; fresh and health-positioned foods could gain.
Who it hits first
- Packaged-food makers whose main sellers are high in fat, salt or sugar - Britannia in biscuits, Bikaji and Gopal Snacks in fried namkeen, Nestle in instant noodles and confectionery, Hatsun in ice cream, Tasty Bite in ready meals - would have to print a red warning hexagon on the front of the pack or reformulate the recipe to avoid it.
- The separate order barring the Everest and LG brands from selling hing is an enforcement action against two spice brands, not a category-wide rule; on five past FSSAI enforcement actions the affected stocks were flat to slightly higher, so we treat it as neutral.
Who may gain
- Brands that already sell low-sugar, low-salt or 'better-for-you' products can advertise the absence of a warning mark as a selling point.
- Fresh and unpackaged food - loose dairy, bakery, fruit and vegetables - carries no label at all, so organised grocery and fresh-food chains gain relative shelf appeal.
- Food-testing and certification labs gain work because every manufacturer has to re-test its whole range against the new thresholds.
- Packaging and label printers get a one-time re-artworking order across essentially every packaged-food SKU in India.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Modern-trade grocers and quick-commerce platforms have to re-shelf and re-merchandise labelled products, and quick-service restaurants face parallel pressure to disclose the same nutrition thresholds on menus. Distributors carry short-term risk on old-artwork stock that has to be sold through before the deadline.
Upstream
Sugar mills, edible-oil refiners and salt suppliers face slightly lower offtake from packaged-food customers over time as recipes are reformulated downward, while specialty ingredient makers that supply sweetener substitutes, fibre and sodium-reduction blends see new demand. Packaging and label printers get an immediate re-artworking order across the whole industry.
Where demand moves
Business
Shoppers who see a red warning on a biscuit or namkeen packet buy less of it or switch to an unlabelled substitute, so demand moves from labelled packaged snacks towards fresh, loose and reformulated products. Manufacturers respond by buying more low-sugar sweeteners, fibre and salt-replacement ingredients from specialty food-ingredient suppliers, and by placing a large one-off order with packaging and label printers to redesign artwork.
Capital
Money rotates within the packaged-food sector rather than out of it: investors move from single-category high-fat/salt/sugar names (Bikaji, Gopal Snacks, Tasty Bite) towards diversified players that have low-risk categories to lean on (Nestle, Tata Consumer) and towards the picks-and-shovels beneficiaries - testing labs and packaging printers - that get paid whichever brand wins.
How it spreads across sectors
Consumer Services
Restaurants and food-delivery platforms face parallel menu-disclosure pressure
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Reformulation cost, SKU rationalisation and slower volume growth in high-fat/salt/sugar categories
Healthcare
Food-testing and certification labs gain recurring compliance work
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
sugar
Note
Demand-side trigger, added after the Layer 8.5 critic flagged it. A mandatory red warning mark on high-sugar packets pushes manufacturers to reformulate downward, which reduces industrial sugar demand from packaged food over 12-24 months. Nestle India, Britannia and Hatsun all carry a negative DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge to sugar in the graph, confirming sugar as a real input for each. None of those edges carries a cost_weight_pct, so margin_impact_bps cannot be computed from data and is deliberately left null rather than estimated. Note the direction conflict worth watching: the sugar benchmark is currently UP 25.02% over one month (a near-term cost headwind for these same companies), while the labelling rule is a medium-term demand REDUCTION for sugar. Nestle and Britannia also carry negative wheat, palm oil and dairy edges; Bikaji carries a negative palm oil edge and Gopal Snacks a palm oil edge at 28% cost weight.
Shock type
demand
When it plays out
Immediate
No trading impact on day one - this is a draft standard, not an enforced rule. Expect commentary and category-level de-rating chatter rather than sharp price moves.
Medium term
If enforced, 12-24 months of recipe reformulation and packaging redesign across the industry. Chile and Mexico, which did this first, saw measurable volume declines in warned categories, so the structural risk is to volume growth rates in biscuits, namkeen and sugary drinks rather than to any company's solvency.
Short term
Watch for the formal FSSAI notification and the consultation window. Industry bodies will lobby for higher thresholds and a longer transition, and any softening of thresholds unwinds much of the risk.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Mandatory front-of-pack red warning marks require artwork redesign, plate changes, packaging inventory write-offs and repeat print runs across affected packaged-food SKUs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","EPL","JINDALPOLY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is volume/service-led, though delayed SKU launches can create near-term execution noise. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Packaging and Label Printing","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Packaged-food companies reformulate to reduce sodium, sugar and saturated fat, increasing demand for sweeteners, emulsifiers, stabilisers, preservatives, flavour systems and texture modifiers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["FINEORG","CAMLINFINE","TATACHEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how strict thresholds are and whether large FMCG firms reformulate rather than absorb warning-label risk. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Ingredients and Specialty Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"High-sugar warning labels pressure confectionery, beverages, biscuits and sweetened dairy to cut sugar intensity, potentially reducing industrial sugar demand while increasing alternative sweetener adoption.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","DWARKESH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for refined sugar exposure; potentially positive for firms able to supply specialty sweeteners or ethanol-diverted economics. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Sugar and Sweetener Value Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Warnings tied to saturated fat can push snacks, bakery and instant-food makers to alter fat blends, reduce palm/vanaspati-heavy formulations and shift toward perceived healthier oils.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["AWL","PATANJALI","GOKULAGRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume mix may shift more than total edible-oil demand; margin impact depends on replacement oil costs. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Edible Oils and Fats","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Warning labels make packaged-food comparisons more visible at point of sale, driving shelf resets, private-label reformulation, promotions on compliant SKUs and consumer switching toward fresh or healthier baskets.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["DMART","TRENT","VMM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Retailers may gain bargaining power and private-label share, but high-HFSS category throughput could soften. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Organised Food Retail and Grocery Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If sweetened dairy products face warning labels, consumers may shift toward plain milk, curd, paneer and less-processed fresh alternatives positioned as healthier.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HATSUN","DODLA","PARAGMILK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for sweetened/flavoured dairy SKUs; positive for plain and fresh dairy portfolios. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Dairy and Fresh Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Brands need nutrient profiling, lab validation, contaminant checks and compliance documentation; hing enforcement also raises demand for quality testing in spices and additives.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VIMTALABS","LALPATHLAB","METROPOLIS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play food testing exposure is limited among listed names, so ticker linkage is partial. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Testing, Certification and Compliance Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Brands with warning-labelled products may pull back mass advertising or redirect budgets toward reformulated, health-positioned SKUs; challengers may spend more to capture switching consumers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SUNTV","ZEEL","NAZARA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Category-level ad budgets could churn rather than collapse, with creative and claims scrutiny rising. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Advertising and Media","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Although rule targets packaged foods, public attention to HFSS content can spill into QSR and cloud-kitchen procurement, nudging menus toward lower-sodium sauces, healthier oils and smaller dessert/beverage bundles.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","SAPPHIRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order reputational and consumer-preference effect, not a direct labelling obligation. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Restaurant Supply Chain and Foodservice Inputs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
15 Jun, 04:24 IST · Market event · medium impact
FSSAI cracks down on 15 popular Indian food brands for misleading names and claims
Who it hits first
- NESTLEIND already under FSSAI scrutiny; 15-brand list reportedly broader
- Listed FMCG packaged-foods (HUL, ITC, BRITANNIA, DABUR, MARICO, TATACONSUM, PATANJALI, BIKAJI) face uncertainty
Who may gain
- Smaller D2C/regional brands with simpler labels
- Hygiene-conscious consumer rotation toward HUL personal-care + Tata Consumer staples
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Retail shelf labels update; modern-trade partners (DMart, Reliance Retail) require updated artwork
Upstream
Packaging design + label-printing vendors see one-off uptick
Where demand moves
Business
Packaging redesign costs across FMCG; potential product reformulation; rotation within categories from claim-heavy to claim-neutral SKUs
Capital
Capital exits premium-PE FMCG names temporarily; rotates to ITC + value-FMCG until clarity
How it spreads across sectors
FMCG
label revision cost; brand-claim landscape tightens
Packaged Foods
competitive resetting
When it plays out
Immediate
FSSAI list publication triggers sector-wide reset
Medium term
Stricter labeling becomes BAU; smaller players bear disproportionate compliance cost
Short term
Companies submit revised labels in 30-60 days
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 17 Jul 2026 | unspecified | ₹1.25 |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2025 | unspecified | ₹1 |
| 14 Jun 2024 | unspecified | ₹1 |
| 8 Jun 2023 | unspecified | ₹0.75 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call7 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY276 Aug 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2623 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2622 May 2026
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.