Fin Cascade

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

Bikaji Foods International Limited

NSE: BIKAJIPackaged Foods

Share price

₹472.05

+0.73% close of 9 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹11,801 CrP/E 45.2

Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 7 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

76

out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹11,801 Cr

P/E ratio

45.2

P/B ratio

7.4

ROCE

19.8%

ROE

17.5%

Dividend yield

0.3%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 9 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹759.4552-week low ₹468.65

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Sales grew 13.9% over the past year, and 16.0% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 8.4% to 13.4% over the last four years.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

It grew 16.0% a year against a sector median of 9.9% — 6.1 percentage points faster.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

At 44.9× earnings it costs 1.9× the market, which pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 43.8×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 75.7×, the 0th percentile of its own range.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

Priced at 1.9 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 24%.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
Bikaji Foods International Limited — this one24%/yr44.9×₹1.9
Nestle India—68.7×—
Britannia Industries8%/yr43.8×₹5.5
Zydus Wellness Limited-10%/yr71.8×—
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited31%/yr6.9×₹0.22
Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited16%/yr42.2×₹2.6

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Packaged Foods), it ranks 6 of 20 on returns, 6 of 20 on growth, 8 of 20 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

A narrow advantage: it earns 19.8% on capital, ahead of 70% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹970 crore of cash from the business and spent ₹617 crore on plant and equipment, with ₹353 crore to spare; it still raised ₹55 crore mostly borrowed — borrowings rose from ₹160 crore to ₹299 crore. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 7 years, about 107 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 14 days for its cash to waiting 21 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

9 of 9 checks clear · 100%

Latest result · Q1 FY27

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Sales grew 12.5% with volumes up 7.7%, and a 13-13.5% profit-margin target was set for the year

Announced 5 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited

Revenue

₹734 Cr

Revenue vs last year

+12.4%

Revenue vs last quarter

+1.8%

Net profit

₹59 Cr

Profit vs last year

+0.8%

Profit vs last quarter

+6.2%

Net margin

8.1%

EPS

₹2.40

Earnings call transcript · 6 Aug 2026

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹11,801 Cr
Prev close
₹472.05
52w High
₹769
52w Low
₹465
Enterprise value
₹11,760 Cr
Beta
0.6
Price CAGR 1y
-34.0%
Price CAGR 3y
1.0%
Price CAGR 5y
—
Price CAGR 10y
—

Ratios

Return on assets
11.4%
PEG ratio
1.9
P/E ratio
45.2
P/B ratio
7.4
EV / EBITDA
28.5
Industry P/E
43.5
ROCE
19.8%
ROCE 5y average
19.6%
ROE
17.5%
Debt / Equity
0.2
Interest coverage
20.2
Dividend yield
0.3%
ROE 3y average
19.0%
ROE last year
17.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹2,994 Cr
Annual profit
₹254 Cr
Operating margin
14.0%
Net profit margin
8.5%
EBITDA margin
13.7%
Sales growth 3y
15.1%
Sales growth 5y
18.0%
Profit growth 3y
24.0%
Profit growth 5y
24.0%
EPS
₹10.3
Sales growth TTM
14.0%
Profit growth TTM
29.0%
Dividend payout
12.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹734 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹59 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
12.5%
YoY quarterly profit growth
0.0%
OPM latest quarter
13.5%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹64.3
Face Value
₹1.0
Total debt
₹299 Cr
Total cash
₹316 Cr
Borrowings
₹299 Cr
Reserves / Equity
63.3

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
₹304 Cr
Free cash flow
₹127 Cr
FCF yield
0.9%
Net cash flow
₹15 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
73.9%
FII holding
4.6%
DII holding
17.5%
Public holding
4.0%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
Nestle India1,324.0068.32,56,4560.91975.148.66,378.225.284.1
Britannia Inds.4,780.0044.21,15,1071.89593.413.65,000.08.256.0
Zydus Wellness507.5572.716,0970.24118.9-7.01,437.066.94.9
Bikaji Foods483.5546.412,1330.2659.50.4734.312.519.8
The Bombay Burmah1,269.407.18,8451.34582.717.55,088.78.033.0
Mrs Bectors211.0750.16,4770.6235.341.8507.115.712.9
ADF Foods291.7033.23,2100.4117.313.4167.325.921.8
Gopal Snacks255.4058.03,1860.3912.9431.0422.331.111.7
Median250.2044.97220.049.323.0139.815.714.0

Competes with: ADF Foods Limited, Annapurna Swadisht Limited, Britannia Industries, Dangee Dums Limited, Euro India Fresh Foods Limited, Foods & Inns Limited, Ganesh Consumer Products Limited, Gopal Snacks Limited, Hexagon Nutrition Limited, Lotus Chocolate Company Limited, Milky Mist Dairy Food Limited, Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited, Nakoda Group of Industries Limited, Nestle India, Palash Securities Limited, Prataap Snacks Limited, Sundrop Brands Limited, Tasty Bite Eatables Limited, The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, Zydus Wellness Limited

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales482609624614572721715611653830790721734
Expenses416521549453480614659537556702692633635
Material Cost389405544486445482
Change in Inventories-3.99-5.29-271413-16
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade232523166.126.46
Employee Cost414553524954
Other Expenses9087110124120110
Operating Profit66887516192107557496128988899
OPM %1414122616157.76121515121213
Other Income6661278810108111813
Exceptional items (within Other Income)00-4.35000
Interest2333334555445
Depreciation13161615181921252324242426
Profit before tax5675621557893395579107827781
Tax %26202625262628272628242826
Net Profit416046116586928405978625659
EPS in Rs1.672.451.864.642.332.761.141.782.393.182.482.252.40
Diluted EPS in Rs1.782.393.182.482.242.40

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Consolidated · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales1,0751,3111,6111,9662,3292,6172,9943,075
Expenses9791,1661,4711,7521,9372,2872,5832,662
Material Cost1,6761,879
Change in Inventories-8.80-4.24
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade10769
Employee Cost159198
Other Expenses360441
Operating Profit96145140214392330411413
OPM %91191117131413
Other Income811102327314750
Exceptional items (within Other Income)0-4.35
Interest6371111151818
Depreciation3433384960829598
Profit before tax64120105177348264345347
Tax %11252823242726
Net Profit569076136263194254255
EPS in Rs23373.125.50118.011010
Diluted EPS in Rs8.0210
Dividend Payout %9531491212

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
—
5 years
18%
3 years
15%
TTM
14%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
—
5 years
24%
3 years
24%
TTM
29%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
—
5 years
—
3 years
1%
1 year
-34%

Return on equity

10 years
—
5 years
17%
3 years
19%
Last year
17%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital24242525252525
Reserves5055817969311,1931,3581,582
Borrowings5487160170166231299
Other Liabilities94124122146145313325
Minority Interest97100
Total Liabilities6778171,1021,2711,5301,9282,231
Fixed Assets4074235116618129861,034
CWIP33649701298151
Investments366912620315644
Other Assets2302904165206747871,002
Total Assets6778171,1021,2711,5301,9342,240

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity5511757171245193304
Cash from Investing Activity-58-114-232-123-199-122-289
Cash from Financing Activity-26-9169-5-54-550
Net Cash Flow-29-6-543-81615
Free Cash Flow1443-508611872127

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Consolidated
Line itemMar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days14131715161413
Inventory Days22262721202525
Days Payable8201614141614
Cash Conversion Cycle27202821222324
Working Capital Days7-41419162921
ROCE %191318291820

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Consolidated · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters757575757575757574747474
FIIs7.026.897.667.517.487.707.336.646.344.924.684.61
DIIs141414131312121315171718
Public4.223.993.724.064.765.385.575.084.974.544.154.01
No. of Shareholders85,41186,93085,92792,0971,09,7801,42,5141,44,0001,33,5151,32,1151,19,9541,14,7831,11,049

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year -35.6% (₹733.00 → ₹472.05)Brick size ₹20.10 (fixed)Bricks 19
₹500₹600₹700₹472Dec '25Jul '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹472.05 on 9 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

-40.82inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-03-31

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)

92,67,027inr

2026-03-31

volume growth %

7.70pct

2026-06-30

News

News and filings about Bikaji Foods International Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

No recent news for this company.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Industry
Packaged Foods
Classification
Fast Moving Consumer Goods › Packaged Foods
ISIN
INE00E101023

Plants

  • Bikaji Bichhwal Industrial Area plant, Bikaner
  • Bikaji India Food Park plant, Guwahati
  • Bikaji Karni Industrial Area plant, Bikaner
  • Bikaji Muzaffarpur plant (Vindhyawasini Sales)
  • Bikaji Tumakuru plant (Petunt Food Processors)

News impact

Big market events that reach Bikaji Foods International Limited, and how the effect spreads.

Who it hits first

  • India's food safety authority (FSSAI) has named Amazon, Flipkart, Swiggy Instamart, Zepto and BigBasket in penal action over risky food listings.
  • The flagged items include Happilo date bites, Milky Mist dairy products and Dhatura (a toxic plant) fruits and seeds.
  • Named platforms face fines, delistings and tougher listing checks; among listed firms Swiggy (Instamart's owner) is directly hit.
  • Milky Mist, a listed dairy maker whose items were flagged, faces brand and recall risk.

Who may gain

  • Avenue Supermarts (DMart): shoppers worried about online food safety may shift to trusted offline stores.
  • Bikaji Foods: a rival snack brand could gain shelf space if Happilo listings are pulled, partly offset by sector-wide scrutiny.
  • Compliant food brands and testing labs: stricter checks reward clean supply chains.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Downstream, delivery riders and dark-store operators see fewer orders on delisted items, while shoppers gain safer listings at the cost of narrower choice.

Upstream

Upstream, snack and dairy suppliers to quick commerce, including Bikaji Foods (a pack-listed Swiggy supplier), face extra compliance checks and possible order pauses on flagged lines.

Where demand moves

Business

Grocery demand may leak from quick-commerce apps toward offline stores and compliant sellers while flagged listings are delisted and checks tighten.

Capital

Capital is likely to shun the directly named platforms and the flagged dairy brand short-term, favouring profitable offline retail and unaffected staples.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Negative for food-delivery and quick-commerce platforms via fines and compliance costs; neutral for travel, hotels and edtech.

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

Negative for the flagged dairy brand; neutral-to-negative for packaged foods on wider FSSAI scrutiny; alcohol and personal care untouched.

A pattern seen before

Cascade chain

Pattern name

Crude Oil Cascade

Patterns

  • Crude Oil Cascade

Sectors queried

  • Cement
  • Chemicals
  • FMCG
  • Power

When it plays out

Immediate

Named platforms and Milky Mist slip as fines, delistings and inspection headlines dominate the next few days.

Medium term

Over 1-6 months compliance upgrades and restored listings decide whether the damage was a blip or a lasting cost.

Short term

Over 1-4 weeks the fine quantum and any listing bans set the size of the hit; peers stay under watch.

31 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · medium impact

FSSAI moves to mandate red-hexagon front-of-pack warning labels on high fat, salt and sugar packaged foods; separately bars Everest and LG brands from selling hing

India's food regulator wants a red warning hexagon on packets high in fat, salt or sugar. Biscuit, snack and packaged-dairy brands may have to change recipes or lose some sales; fresh and health-positioned foods could gain.

Fast Moving Consumer GoodsConsumer ServicesHealthcare

Who it hits first

  • Packaged-food makers whose main sellers are high in fat, salt or sugar - Britannia in biscuits, Bikaji and Gopal Snacks in fried namkeen, Nestle in instant noodles and confectionery, Hatsun in ice cream, Tasty Bite in ready meals - would have to print a red warning hexagon on the front of the pack or reformulate the recipe to avoid it.
  • The separate order barring the Everest and LG brands from selling hing is an enforcement action against two spice brands, not a category-wide rule; on five past FSSAI enforcement actions the affected stocks were flat to slightly higher, so we treat it as neutral.

Who may gain

  • Brands that already sell low-sugar, low-salt or 'better-for-you' products can advertise the absence of a warning mark as a selling point.
  • Fresh and unpackaged food - loose dairy, bakery, fruit and vegetables - carries no label at all, so organised grocery and fresh-food chains gain relative shelf appeal.
  • Food-testing and certification labs gain work because every manufacturer has to re-test its whole range against the new thresholds.
  • Packaging and label printers get a one-time re-artworking order across essentially every packaged-food SKU in India.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Modern-trade grocers and quick-commerce platforms have to re-shelf and re-merchandise labelled products, and quick-service restaurants face parallel pressure to disclose the same nutrition thresholds on menus. Distributors carry short-term risk on old-artwork stock that has to be sold through before the deadline.

Upstream

Sugar mills, edible-oil refiners and salt suppliers face slightly lower offtake from packaged-food customers over time as recipes are reformulated downward, while specialty ingredient makers that supply sweetener substitutes, fibre and sodium-reduction blends see new demand. Packaging and label printers get an immediate re-artworking order across the whole industry.

Where demand moves

Business

Shoppers who see a red warning on a biscuit or namkeen packet buy less of it or switch to an unlabelled substitute, so demand moves from labelled packaged snacks towards fresh, loose and reformulated products. Manufacturers respond by buying more low-sugar sweeteners, fibre and salt-replacement ingredients from specialty food-ingredient suppliers, and by placing a large one-off order with packaging and label printers to redesign artwork.

Capital

Money rotates within the packaged-food sector rather than out of it: investors move from single-category high-fat/salt/sugar names (Bikaji, Gopal Snacks, Tasty Bite) towards diversified players that have low-risk categories to lean on (Nestle, Tata Consumer) and towards the picks-and-shovels beneficiaries - testing labs and packaging printers - that get paid whichever brand wins.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Restaurants and food-delivery platforms face parallel menu-disclosure pressure

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

Reformulation cost, SKU rationalisation and slower volume growth in high-fat/salt/sugar categories

Healthcare

Food-testing and certification labs gain recurring compliance work

codex additions

Commodity angle

Commodity

sugar

Note

Demand-side trigger, added after the Layer 8.5 critic flagged it. A mandatory red warning mark on high-sugar packets pushes manufacturers to reformulate downward, which reduces industrial sugar demand from packaged food over 12-24 months. Nestle India, Britannia and Hatsun all carry a negative DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge to sugar in the graph, confirming sugar as a real input for each. None of those edges carries a cost_weight_pct, so margin_impact_bps cannot be computed from data and is deliberately left null rather than estimated. Note the direction conflict worth watching: the sugar benchmark is currently UP 25.02% over one month (a near-term cost headwind for these same companies), while the labelling rule is a medium-term demand REDUCTION for sugar. Nestle and Britannia also carry negative wheat, palm oil and dairy edges; Bikaji carries a negative palm oil edge and Gopal Snacks a palm oil edge at 28% cost weight.

Shock type

demand

When it plays out

Immediate

No trading impact on day one - this is a draft standard, not an enforced rule. Expect commentary and category-level de-rating chatter rather than sharp price moves.

Medium term

If enforced, 12-24 months of recipe reformulation and packaging redesign across the industry. Chile and Mexico, which did this first, saw measurable volume declines in warned categories, so the structural risk is to volume growth rates in biscuits, namkeen and sugary drinks rather than to any company's solvency.

Short term

Watch for the formal FSSAI notification and the consultation window. Industry bodies will lobby for higher thresholds and a longer transition, and any softening of thresholds unwinds much of the risk.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Mandatory front-of-pack red warning marks require artwork redesign, plate changes, packaging inventory write-offs and repeat print runs across affected packaged-food SKUs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","EPL","JINDALPOLY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is volume/service-led, though delayed SKU launches can create near-term execution noise. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Packaging and Label Printing","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Packaged-food companies reformulate to reduce sodium, sugar and saturated fat, increasing demand for sweeteners, emulsifiers, stabilisers, preservatives, flavour systems and texture modifiers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["FINEORG","CAMLINFINE","TATACHEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how strict thresholds are and whether large FMCG firms reformulate rather than absorb warning-label risk. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Ingredients and Specialty Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"High-sugar warning labels pressure confectionery, beverages, biscuits and sweetened dairy to cut sugar intensity, potentially reducing industrial sugar demand while increasing alternative sweetener adoption.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","DWARKESH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for refined sugar exposure; potentially positive for firms able to supply specialty sweeteners or ethanol-diverted economics. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Sugar and Sweetener Value Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Warnings tied to saturated fat can push snacks, bakery and instant-food makers to alter fat blends, reduce palm/vanaspati-heavy formulations and shift toward perceived healthier oils.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["AWL","PATANJALI","GOKULAGRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume mix may shift more than total edible-oil demand; margin impact depends on replacement oil costs. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Edible Oils and Fats","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Warning labels make packaged-food comparisons more visible at point of sale, driving shelf resets, private-label reformulation, promotions on compliant SKUs and consumer switching toward fresh or healthier baskets.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["DMART","TRENT","VMM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Retailers may gain bargaining power and private-label share, but high-HFSS category throughput could soften. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Organised Food Retail and Grocery Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"If sweetened dairy products face warning labels, consumers may shift toward plain milk, curd, paneer and less-processed fresh alternatives positioned as healthier.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HATSUN","DODLA","PARAGMILK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for sweetened/flavoured dairy SKUs; positive for plain and fresh dairy portfolios. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Dairy and Fresh Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Brands need nutrient profiling, lab validation, contaminant checks and compliance documentation; hing enforcement also raises demand for quality testing in spices and additives.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VIMTALABS","LALPATHLAB","METROPOLIS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play food testing exposure is limited among listed names, so ticker linkage is partial. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Testing, Certification and Compliance Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Brands with warning-labelled products may pull back mass advertising or redirect budgets toward reformulated, health-positioned SKUs; challengers may spend more to capture switching consumers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SUNTV","ZEEL","NAZARA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Category-level ad budgets could churn rather than collapse, with creative and claims scrutiny rising. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Advertising and Media","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Although rule targets packaged foods, public attention to HFSS content can spill into QSR and cloud-kitchen procurement, nudging menus toward lower-sodium sauces, healthier oils and smaller dessert/beverage bundles.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","SAPPHIRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order reputational and consumer-preference effect, not a direct labelling obligation. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Restaurant Supply Chain and Foodservice Inputs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Who it hits first

  • NESTLEIND already under FSSAI scrutiny; 15-brand list reportedly broader
  • Listed FMCG packaged-foods (HUL, ITC, BRITANNIA, DABUR, MARICO, TATACONSUM, PATANJALI, BIKAJI) face uncertainty

Who may gain

  • Smaller D2C/regional brands with simpler labels
  • Hygiene-conscious consumer rotation toward HUL personal-care + Tata Consumer staples

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Retail shelf labels update; modern-trade partners (DMart, Reliance Retail) require updated artwork

Upstream

Packaging design + label-printing vendors see one-off uptick

Where demand moves

Business

Packaging redesign costs across FMCG; potential product reformulation; rotation within categories from claim-heavy to claim-neutral SKUs

Capital

Capital exits premium-PE FMCG names temporarily; rotates to ITC + value-FMCG until clarity

How it spreads across sectors

FMCG

label revision cost; brand-claim landscape tightens

Packaged Foods

competitive resetting

When it plays out

Immediate

FSSAI list publication triggers sector-wide reset

Medium term

Stricter labeling becomes BAU; smaller players bear disproportionate compliance cost

Short term

Companies submit revised labels in 30-60 days

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

17 Jul 2026unspecified₹1.25
29 Aug 2025unspecified₹1
14 Jun 2024unspecified₹1
8 Jun 2023unspecified₹0.75

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.