Fin Cascade

Prices as of 8 Oct 2026 close · Not investment advice

Tasty Bite Eatables Limited

NSE: TASTYBITEPackaged Foods

Share price

₹8,999.00

-3.99% close of 8 Oct 2026

Market cap ₹2,309 CrP/E 64.2

Business score

How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.

63

out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026

Your ratios

The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.

Market cap

₹2,309 Cr

P/E ratio

64.2

P/B ratio

6.8

ROCE

14.0%

ROE

10.7%

Dividend yield

0.1%

Price & valuation chart

How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.

Prices as of 8 Oct 2026 close52-week high ₹10,392.0052-week low ₹6,453.50

Answers

Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.

How fast it has been growing

Sales fell 1.2% over the past year. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales improved from 7.6% to 10.1% over the last four years.

Whether it grew faster than its sector

It grew 17.6% a year against a sector median of 9.9% — 7.7 percentage points faster.

Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating

At 64.2× earnings it costs 2.7× the market, which pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 43.8×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 96.2×, the 17th percentile of its own range.

Whether growth justifies the valuation

Priced at 12.8 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 5%.

Profit growthPrice per ₹1 profitPer 1% growth
Tasty Bite Eatables Limited — this one5%/yr64.2×₹12.8
Britannia Industries8%/yr43.8×₹5.5
Zydus Wellness Limited-10%/yr71.8×—
Bikaji Foods International Limited24%/yr44.9×₹1.9
The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited31%/yr6.9×₹0.22
Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited16%/yr42.2×₹2.6

Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

How it compares with its peers

Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Packaged Foods), it ranks 9 of 20 on returns, 5 of 20 on growth, 13 of 20 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?

A narrow advantage: it earns 14% on capital, ahead of 55% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.

Whether its growth pays for itself

Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹291 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹118 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹184 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 147 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 48 days for its cash to waiting 80 days for its cash.

Profit reality check

Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.

8 of 9 checks clear · 89%

Latest result · Q1 FY27

What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.

Announced 12 Aug 2026 · Standalone · Unaudited

Revenue

₹156 Cr

Revenue vs last year

+28.6%

Revenue vs last quarter

+32.3%

Net profit

₹9 Cr

Profit vs last year

+7.9%

Profit vs last quarter

+47.1%

Net margin

5.7%

EPS

₹34.45

Checklist before you investPRO

Points for and against, in one list.

Key numbers & peers

The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.

Price

Market cap
₹2,309 Cr
Prev close
₹8,999.00
52w High
₹10,544
52w Low
₹6,430
Enterprise value
₹2,324 Cr
Beta
1.1
Price CAGR 1y
6.0%
Price CAGR 3y
-17.0%
Price CAGR 5y
-12.0%
Price CAGR 10y
8.0%

Ratios

Return on assets
7.4%
PEG ratio
12.7
P/E ratio
64.2
P/B ratio
6.8
EV / EBITDA
38.1
Industry P/E
43.1
ROCE
14.0%
ROCE 5y average
12.4%
ROE
10.7%
Debt / Equity
0.1
Interest coverage
9.0
Dividend yield
0.1%
ROE 3y average
12.0%
ROE last year
11.0%

Annual P&L

Annual revenue
₹549 Cr
Annual profit
₹35 Cr
Operating margin
11.0%
Net profit margin
6.4%
EBITDA margin
11.3%
Sales growth 3y
4.9%
Sales growth 5y
7.4%
Profit growth 3y
5.0%
Profit growth 5y
-2.0%
EPS
₹138
Sales growth TTM
-1.0%
Profit growth TTM
-3.0%
Dividend payout
1.0%

Quarter P&L

Sales latest quarter
₹156 Cr
Profit latest quarter
₹9 Cr
YoY quarterly sales growth
28.6%
YoY quarterly profit growth
7.9%
OPM latest quarter
9.5%

Balance Sheet

Book Value
₹1,333
Face Value
₹10.0
Total debt
₹42 Cr
Total cash
₹27 Cr
Borrowings
₹42 Cr
Reserves / Equity
113.0

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow
₹59 Cr
Free cash flow
₹51 Cr
FCF yield
1.9%
Net cash flow
₹12 Cr

Shareholding

Promoter holding
74.2%
FII holding
3.7%
DII holding
0.0%
Public holding
22.0%

Peer comparison

CompanyPrice ₹P/EMkt cap ₹ CrDiv yield %Profit qtr ₹ CrProfit var %Sales qtr ₹ CrSales var %ROCE %
Nestle India1,315.5067.62,53,6700.91975.148.66,378.225.284.1
Britannia Inds.4,773.8544.21,14,9871.88593.413.65,000.08.256.0
Zydus Wellness497.3571.515,8240.24118.9-7.01,437.066.94.9
Bikaji Foods471.1042.511,8120.2664.62.2678.28.722.0
The Bombay Burmah1,221.756.88,5241.35582.717.55,088.78.033.0
Mrs Bectors205.7548.96,3160.6135.341.8507.115.712.9
ADF Foods287.7032.73,1610.4017.313.4167.325.921.8
Tasty Bite Eat.9,041.5063.92,3200.118.87.9155.828.614.0
Median244.9044.27220.049.323.0139.815.714.0

Competes with: ADF Foods Limited, Bikaji Foods International Limited, Britannia Industries, Gopal Snacks Limited, Mrs. Bectors Food Specialities Limited, Nestle India, The Bombay Burmah Trading Corporation Limited, Zydus Wellness Limited

Quarterly results

Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.

Standalone · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemJun 2023Sep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Sales15414513310985157179134121133177118156
Expenses12112512010184140156123105124151107141
Material Cost90858310090101
Change in Inventories-5.86-135.1912-19-4.91
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade000000
Employee Cost151213141215
Other Expenses242222252430
Operating Profit3320138.261.61172311168.74261115
OPM %21149.857.581.8911138.17136.58159.499.49
Other Income5.014.834.253.792.246.494.815.074.115.716.366.345.89
Exceptional items (within Other Income)000-0.4500
Interest1.912.171.391.531.311.811.881.191.251.761.371.390.97
Depreciation7.497.337.607.157.477.587.387.367.497.767.807.987.78
Profit before tax29158.333.37-4.9314187.44114.93238.1412
Tax %25252525-252728172627252626
Net Profit21116.252.55-3.6910136.198.193.62176.018.84
EPS in Rs8344249.94-143951243214682334
Diluted EPS in Rs243214682334

Profit & loss

Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.

Standalone · to 31 Mar 2026
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026TTM
Sales167196252296337426385372476540554549583
Expenses152174209248291381332338411464503487522
Material Cost361358
Change in Inventories-3.25-15
Purchases of Stock-in-Trade00
Employee Cost4951
Other Expenses9693
Operating Profit15214348464554346576526261
OPM %91117161411149141491110
Other Income111337182919131316192224
Exceptional items (within Other Income)0-0.45
Interest323244389765.775
Depreciation77911131717242730303131
Profit before tax16253441475353144156344848
Tax %353436363623252926252626
Net Profit11162226304139103042263536
EPS in Rs42638610311715915340118162100138140
Diluted EPS in Rs100138
Dividend Payout %232221122121

Compounded growth

Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.

Compounded sales growth

10 years
11%
5 years
7%
3 years
5%
TTM
-1%

Compounded profit growth

10 years
8%
5 years
-2%
3 years
5%
TTM
-3%

Stock price CAGR

10 years
8%
5 years
-12%
3 years
-17%
1 year
6%

Return on equity

10 years
16%
5 years
11%
3 years
12%
Last year
11%

Balance sheet

What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.

Standalone
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Equity Capital33333333332.572.57
Reserves42587297129161204215241284309339
Borrowings444163543971175138134867242
Other Liabilities243032385465667683747191
Total Liabilities113131170192225300448431461447455475
Fixed Assets616165768298179189207238216206
CWIP00921026426254192114
Investments120000000000
Other Assets516896113132175226180200190218255
Total Assets113131170192225300448431461447455475

Cash flows

Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.

Standalone
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Cash from Operating Activity101512215637406561673959
Cash from Investing Activity-4-7-24-7-30-52-56-47-34-16-12-6
Cash from Financing Activity-4-611-12-231543-49-18-56-20-41
Net Cash Flow21-122-027-3110-5712
Free Cash Flow79-141125-15-162323502651

Ratios

How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.

Standalone
Line itemMar 2015Mar 2016Mar 2017Mar 2018Mar 2019Mar 2020Mar 2021Mar 2022Mar 2023Mar 2024Mar 2025Mar 2026
Debtor Days404348454249515344404947
Inventory Days485669728777104981069791115
Days Payable585850556862749183585472
Cash Conversion Cycle304266636064826168798590
Working Capital Days62844576036424835617680
ROCE %23283130322818614171114

Shareholding pattern

Who owns the company — founders (promoters), foreign funds, Indian funds and the public. In %.

Standalone · to 30 Jun 2026
Line itemSep 2023Dec 2023Mar 2024Jun 2024Sep 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sep 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026
Promoters747474747474747474747474
FIIs3.733.774.124.123.873.793.743.703.683.663.673.73
DIIs0.480.470.470.470.480.440.610.460.460.460.460
Public222221212122212222222222
No. of Shareholders13,70213,93713,25014,82022,17921,64521,77719,92019,69319,78319,21218,396

Price trend

The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.

Change over 1 year +2.1% (₹8,815.00 → ₹8,999.00)Brick size ₹304.56 (fixed)Bricks 30
₹7,000₹8,000₹10,000₹8,999Nov '25Feb '26May '26Aug '26
Price moved up one brickPrice moved down one brickLast close ₹8,999.00 on 8 Oct 2026

Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.

Open interestPRO

Where option traders are positioned on this stock.

Industry numbers

The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.

1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive

0.00flag

2026-03-31

the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end

0.00cr

2026-06-30

the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)

0.00cr

2026-06-30

net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash

14.67inr_cr

2026-03-31

guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)

0.00cr

2026-03-31

security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP

0.00cr

2026-03-31

FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)

1,95,37,367inr

2026-03-31

News

News and filings about Tasty Bite Eatables Limited. Open one to see why it matters.

No recent news for this company.

Supply chain

Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.

Uses as raw material

  • Basmati rice and whole grains
  • Dairy (cheese, paneer, cream)
  • Fresh vegetables
  • Pulses and lentils
  • Retort pouch / packaging material
  • Spices and seasonings

Sells to

About

What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.

Sector
Fast Moving Consumer Goods
Industry
Packaged Foods
Classification
Fast Moving Consumer Goods › Packaged Foods
ISIN
INE488B01017

Plants

  • Tasty Bite Plant, Bhandgaon

News impact

Big market events that reach Tasty Bite Eatables Limited, and how the effect spreads.

15 Sept, 05:00 IST · Market event · medium impact

Emami board to consider share buyback on September 17

Ayurveda products maker Emami may announce buying back its own shares on September 17 — usually a quick boost for the stock.

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

Who it hits first

  • Emami stock rallies 2-4% into the Sep-17 board meet on buyback expectations.
  • A confirmed buyback shrinks share count and lifts per-share earnings and price.
  • FMCG peers see no fundamental impact — pure sentiment markers.

Who may gain

  • Emami shareholders: buyback price support plus reduced share count.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Distributors and retailers see zero impact from a board buyback decision.

Upstream

No direct supply-chain link — a capital-allocation event, not an operations event.

Where demand moves

Business

No business-demand change — this is capital return, not operations; traders supply event liquidity.

Capital

Money rotates into Emami for the event; record-date arbitrage follows if confirmed.

How it spreads across sectors

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

No ripple — single-company capital return with no peer read-through.

When it plays out

Immediate

Emami up 2-4% into Sep 17; peers flat.

Medium term

Executed buybacks support the price for quarters via a smaller share count.

Short term

Board decision day decides all: confirm (rally extends) or defer (full unwind).

31 Aug, 04:26 IST · Market event · medium impact

FSSAI moves to mandate red-hexagon front-of-pack warning labels on high fat, salt and sugar packaged foods; separately bars Everest and LG brands from selling hing

India's food regulator wants a red warning hexagon on packets high in fat, salt or sugar. Biscuit, snack and packaged-dairy brands may have to change recipes or lose some sales; fresh and health-positioned foods could gain.

Fast Moving Consumer GoodsConsumer ServicesHealthcare

Who it hits first

  • Packaged-food makers whose main sellers are high in fat, salt or sugar - Britannia in biscuits, Bikaji and Gopal Snacks in fried namkeen, Nestle in instant noodles and confectionery, Hatsun in ice cream, Tasty Bite in ready meals - would have to print a red warning hexagon on the front of the pack or reformulate the recipe to avoid it.
  • The separate order barring the Everest and LG brands from selling hing is an enforcement action against two spice brands, not a category-wide rule; on five past FSSAI enforcement actions the affected stocks were flat to slightly higher, so we treat it as neutral.

Who may gain

  • Brands that already sell low-sugar, low-salt or 'better-for-you' products can advertise the absence of a warning mark as a selling point.
  • Fresh and unpackaged food - loose dairy, bakery, fruit and vegetables - carries no label at all, so organised grocery and fresh-food chains gain relative shelf appeal.
  • Food-testing and certification labs gain work because every manufacturer has to re-test its whole range against the new thresholds.
  • Packaging and label printers get a one-time re-artworking order across essentially every packaged-food SKU in India.

Along the supply chain

Downstream

Modern-trade grocers and quick-commerce platforms have to re-shelf and re-merchandise labelled products, and quick-service restaurants face parallel pressure to disclose the same nutrition thresholds on menus. Distributors carry short-term risk on old-artwork stock that has to be sold through before the deadline.

Upstream

Sugar mills, edible-oil refiners and salt suppliers face slightly lower offtake from packaged-food customers over time as recipes are reformulated downward, while specialty ingredient makers that supply sweetener substitutes, fibre and sodium-reduction blends see new demand. Packaging and label printers get an immediate re-artworking order across the whole industry.

Where demand moves

Business

Shoppers who see a red warning on a biscuit or namkeen packet buy less of it or switch to an unlabelled substitute, so demand moves from labelled packaged snacks towards fresh, loose and reformulated products. Manufacturers respond by buying more low-sugar sweeteners, fibre and salt-replacement ingredients from specialty food-ingredient suppliers, and by placing a large one-off order with packaging and label printers to redesign artwork.

Capital

Money rotates within the packaged-food sector rather than out of it: investors move from single-category high-fat/salt/sugar names (Bikaji, Gopal Snacks, Tasty Bite) towards diversified players that have low-risk categories to lean on (Nestle, Tata Consumer) and towards the picks-and-shovels beneficiaries - testing labs and packaging printers - that get paid whichever brand wins.

How it spreads across sectors

Consumer Services

Restaurants and food-delivery platforms face parallel menu-disclosure pressure

Fast Moving Consumer Goods

Reformulation cost, SKU rationalisation and slower volume growth in high-fat/salt/sugar categories

Healthcare

Food-testing and certification labs gain recurring compliance work

codex additions

Commodity angle

Commodity

sugar

Note

Demand-side trigger, added after the Layer 8.5 critic flagged it. A mandatory red warning mark on high-sugar packets pushes manufacturers to reformulate downward, which reduces industrial sugar demand from packaged food over 12-24 months. Nestle India, Britannia and Hatsun all carry a negative DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge to sugar in the graph, confirming sugar as a real input for each. None of those edges carries a cost_weight_pct, so margin_impact_bps cannot be computed from data and is deliberately left null rather than estimated. Note the direction conflict worth watching: the sugar benchmark is currently UP 25.02% over one month (a near-term cost headwind for these same companies), while the labelling rule is a medium-term demand REDUCTION for sugar. Nestle and Britannia also carry negative wheat, palm oil and dairy edges; Bikaji carries a negative palm oil edge and Gopal Snacks a palm oil edge at 28% cost weight.

Shock type

demand

When it plays out

Immediate

No trading impact on day one - this is a draft standard, not an enforced rule. Expect commentary and category-level de-rating chatter rather than sharp price moves.

Medium term

If enforced, 12-24 months of recipe reformulation and packaging redesign across the industry. Chile and Mexico, which did this first, saw measurable volume declines in warned categories, so the structural risk is to volume growth rates in biscuits, namkeen and sugary drinks rather than to any company's solvency.

Short term

Watch for the formal FSSAI notification and the consultation window. Industry bodies will lobby for higher thresholds and a longer transition, and any softening of thresholds unwinds much of the risk.

Other sectors it reaches

  • {"causal_chain":"Mandatory front-of-pack red warning marks require artwork redesign, plate changes, packaging inventory write-offs and repeat print runs across affected packaged-food SKUs.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","EPL","JINDALPOLY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is volume/service-led, though delayed SKU launches can create near-term execution noise. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Packaging and Label Printing","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Packaged-food companies reformulate to reduce sodium, sugar and saturated fat, increasing demand for sweeteners, emulsifiers, stabilisers, preservatives, flavour systems and texture modifiers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["FINEORG","CAMLINFINE","TATACHEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Upside depends on how strict thresholds are and whether large FMCG firms reformulate rather than absorb warning-label risk. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Ingredients and Specialty Chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"High-sugar warning labels pressure confectionery, beverages, biscuits and sweetened dairy to cut sugar intensity, potentially reducing industrial sugar demand while increasing alternative sweetener adoption.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["BALRAMCHIN","TRIVENI","DWARKESH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for refined sugar exposure; potentially positive for firms able to supply specialty sweeteners or ethanol-diverted economics. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Sugar and Sweetener Value Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Warnings tied to saturated fat can push snacks, bakery and instant-food makers to alter fat blends, reduce palm/vanaspati-heavy formulations and shift toward perceived healthier oils.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["AWL","PATANJALI","GOKULAGRO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume mix may shift more than total edible-oil demand; margin impact depends on replacement oil costs. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Edible Oils and Fats","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Warning labels make packaged-food comparisons more visible at point of sale, driving shelf resets, private-label reformulation, promotions on compliant SKUs and consumer switching toward fresh or healthier baskets.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["DMART","TRENT","VMM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Retailers may gain bargaining power and private-label share, but high-HFSS category throughput could soften. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Organised Food Retail and Grocery Platforms","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"If sweetened dairy products face warning labels, consumers may shift toward plain milk, curd, paneer and less-processed fresh alternatives positioned as healthier.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["HATSUN","DODLA","PARAGMILK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for sweetened/flavoured dairy SKUs; positive for plain and fresh dairy portfolios. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Dairy and Fresh Foods","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Brands need nutrient profiling, lab validation, contaminant checks and compliance documentation; hing enforcement also raises demand for quality testing in spices and additives.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VIMTALABS","LALPATHLAB","METROPOLIS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play food testing exposure is limited among listed names, so ticker linkage is partial. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Food Testing, Certification and Compliance Services","time_horizon":"immediate"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Brands with warning-labelled products may pull back mass advertising or redirect budgets toward reformulated, health-positioned SKUs; challengers may spend more to capture switching consumers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SUNTV","ZEEL","NAZARA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Category-level ad budgets could churn rather than collapse, with creative and claims scrutiny rising. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Advertising and Media","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
  • {"causal_chain":"Although rule targets packaged foods, public attention to HFSS content can spill into QSR and cloud-kitchen procurement, nudging menus toward lower-sodium sauces, healthier oils and smaller dessert/beverage bundles.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["JUBLFOOD","DEVYANI","SAPPHIRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"This is a second-order reputational and consumer-preference effect, not a direct labelling obligation. (Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5)","sector":"Restaurant Supply Chain and Foodservice Inputs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}

Dividends, splits & big trades

Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.

Dividends

6 Aug 2026unspecified₹10
1 Aug 2025unspecified₹2
1 Aug 2024unspecified₹2
14 Jul 2023unspecified₹2
25 Aug 2022unspecified₹1
15 Jul 2021unspecified₹2
16 Jul 2020unspecified₹2
18 Jul 2019unspecified₹2

Splits, bonuses & buybacks

  • daily-prices repair: 7 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 0, insert 6), 2020-02-01..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 1 Feb 2020
  • bse-history fill: 301 BSE bars before cutoff, code 519091, seam residual 0.99861× · 23 Mar 2017

Documents

Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.

Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.