Exide Industries Limited
NSE: EXIDEINDAuto Components & Equipments
Share price
₹394.90
-2.00% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
60
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹33,567 Cr
P/E ratio
35.8
P/B ratio
2.4
ROCE
8.5%
ROE
6.0%
Dividend yield
0.5%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 7.6% over the past year, and 12.4% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 10.7% to 10.3% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 12.4% a year against a sector median of 10.5% — 1.9 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 35.8× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 51.0×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 32.1×, the 56th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 17.9 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 2%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exide Industries Limited — this one | 2%/yr | 35.8× | ₹17.9 |
| Samvardhana Motherson International Limited | 40%/yr | 35.3× | ₹0.88 |
| Bosch Limited | 14%/yr | 54.8× | ₹3.9 |
| Bharat Forge Limited | 33%/yr | 85.2× | ₹2.6 |
| UNO Minda Limited | 23%/yr | 51.0× | ₹2.2 |
| Schaeffler India Limited | 10%/yr | 46.2× | ₹4.6 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Auto Components & Equipments), it ranks 83 of 101 on returns, 36 of 99 on growth, 75 of 101 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 8.5% on capital, ahead of 18% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹6048 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹6565 crore on plant and equipment, ₹517 crore more than it made, paid from its own cash and investments. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 118 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 40 days for its cash to waiting 4 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
9 of 9 checks clear · 100%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue rose 17.8% year on year as lithium cell sampling began and full-year core growth guidance was no longer repeated.
Announced 30 Jul 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹5,528 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+17.7%
Revenue vs last quarter
+16.8%
Net profit
₹351 Cr
Profit vs last year
+27.7%
Profit vs last quarter
+61.9%
Net margin
6.4%
EPS
₹4.12
Earnings call transcript · 3 Aug 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹33,567 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹394.90
- 52w High
- ₹496
- 52w Low
- ₹287
- Enterprise value
- ₹34,880 Cr
- Beta
- 1.2
- Price CAGR 1y
- 1.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 16.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 17.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 8.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 4.1%
- PEG ratio
- 17.9
- P/E ratio
- 35.8
- P/B ratio
- 2.4
- EV / EBITDA
- 18.7
- Industry P/E
- 30.6
- ROCE
- 8.5%
- ROCE 5y average
- 9.8%
- ROE
- 6.0%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.1
- Interest coverage
- 10.7
- Dividend yield
- 0.5%
- ROE 3y average
- 6.0%
- ROE last year
- 6.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹17,995 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹860 Cr
- Operating margin
- 10.0%
- Net profit margin
- 4.8%
- EBITDA margin
- 10.4%
- Sales growth 3y
- 6.1%
- Sales growth 5y
- 11.7%
- Profit growth 3y
- 2.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 1.0%
- EPS
- ₹10.1
- Sales growth TTM
- 8.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 11.0%
- Dividend payout
- 20.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹5,528 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹351 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 17.7%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 27.6%
- OPM latest quarter
- 11.2%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹164
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹1,575 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹258 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹1,575 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 162.6
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹2,413 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹1,293 Cr
- FCF yield
- 3.5%
- Net cash flow
- ₹57 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 46.0%
- FII holding
- 10.6%
- DII holding
- 19.3%
- Public holding
- 24.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samvardh. Mothe. | 159.20 | 36.8 | 1,68,027 | 0.38 | 1,075.7 | 81.5 | 35,243.8 | 16.6 | 13.4 |
| Bosch | 44,410.00 | 55.4 | 1,30,992 | 0.61 | 706.1 | 5.2 | 5,841.9 | 22.0 | 21.5 |
| Bharat Forge | 1,841.80 | 89.1 | 90,003 | 0.46 | -89.9 | -57.7 | 4,639.9 | 18.7 | 12.6 |
| Uno Minda | 1,104.80 | 52.2 | 63,799 | 0.24 | 315.5 | 1.8 | 5,556.9 | 23.8 | 19.6 |
| Schaeffler India | 3,797.00 | 46.0 | 59,349 | 0.92 | 336.7 | 13.7 | 2,681.4 | 17.5 | 27.9 |
| Sona BLW Precis. | 810.50 | 65.1 | 50,589 | 0.42 | 220.1 | 73.4 | 1,157.2 | 50.8 | 15.1 |
| Tube Investments | 2,388.00 | 73.8 | 46,225 | 0.15 | 294.0 | -15.3 | 6,215.3 | 17.1 | 17.1 |
| Exide Inds. | 402.95 | 36.5 | 34,251 | 0.50 | 351.3 | 28.4 | 5,528.4 | 17.8 | 8.5 |
| Median | 462.10 | 29.9 | 1,631 | 0.32 | 12.3 | 22.3 | 265.5 | 21.0 | 16.4 |
Competes with: Bharat Forge Limited, Bosch Limited, Samvardhana Motherson International Limited, Schaeffler India Limited, Sona BLW Precision Forgings Limited, Tube Investments of India Limited, UNO Minda Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 4,245 | 4,372 | 3,980 | 4,173 | 4,436 | 4,450 | 4,017 | 4,335 | 4,695 | 4,365 | 4,201 | 4,735 | 5,528 |
| Expenses | 3,807 | 3,872 | 3,548 | 3,725 | 3,963 | 3,978 | 3,592 | 3,907 | 4,157 | 3,973 | 3,748 | 4,247 | 4,907 |
| Material Cost | 3,092 | 2,961 | 2,952 | 3,169 | 3,524 | ||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 41 | 5.27 | -162 | 29 | 260 | ||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 37 | 8.74 | 19 | 41 | 37 | ||||||||
| Employee Cost | 344 | 342 | 334 | 352 | 381 | ||||||||
| Other Expenses | 643 | 656 | 606 | 656 | 705 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 438 | 499 | 432 | 448 | 473 | 472 | 425 | 428 | 538 | 391 | 452 | 488 | 621 |
| OPM % | 10 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 9.87 | 11 | 8.97 | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| Other Income | 23 | 38 | 25 | 5 | 16 | 40 | 13 | 44 | 28 | 54 | 5 | 4 | 27 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | -10 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Interest | 24 | 30 | 32 | 31 | 30 | 34 | 54 | 35 | 32 | 40 | 25 | 27 | 20 |
| Depreciation | 132 | 141 | 145 | 142 | 144 | 146 | 145 | 148 | 149 | 152 | 149 | 138 | 142 |
| Profit before tax | 304 | 366 | 281 | 281 | 316 | 332 | 238 | 290 | 385 | 253 | 283 | 327 | 487 |
| Tax % | 26 | 26 | 28 | 34 | 30 | 30 | 33 | 35 | 29 | 31 | 31 | 34 | 28 |
| Net Profit | 224 | 270 | 203 | 186 | 221 | 233 | 158 | 188 | 275 | 174 | 195 | 217 | 351 |
| EPS in Rs | 2.62 | 3.17 | 2.36 | 2.17 | 2.59 | 2.72 | 1.84 | 2.20 | 3.21 | 2.02 | 2.28 | 2.53 | 4.12 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 3.21 | 2.02 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 4.12 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 9,471 | 9,477 | 11,179 | 12,808 | 14,721 | 14,471 | 10,359 | 12,789 | 15,078 | 16,770 | 17,238 | 17,995 | 18,829 |
| Expenses | 8,528 | 8,289 | 9,805 | 11,400 | 13,159 | 13,014 | 8,994 | 11,387 | 13,485 | 14,946 | 15,433 | 16,119 | 16,875 |
| Material Cost | 12,174 | ||||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -88 | ||||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 106 | ||||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 1,372 | ||||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 2,561 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 944 | 1,187 | 1,374 | 1,408 | 1,562 | 1,457 | 1,366 | 1,402 | 1,593 | 1,823 | 1,805 | 1,876 | 1,953 |
| OPM % | 10 | 13 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Other Income | 94 | 59 | 102 | 21 | 148 | 40 | 132 | 3,725 | 125 | 88 | 113 | 91 | 91 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | -10 | ||||||||||||
| Interest | 9 | 79 | 153 | 114 | 117 | 108 | 37 | 64 | 79 | 120 | 160 | 129 | 111 |
| Depreciation | 155 | 175 | 226 | 267 | 344 | 418 | 394 | 440 | 502 | 560 | 582 | 589 | 582 |
| Profit before tax | 874 | 992 | 1,097 | 1,048 | 1,249 | 972 | 1,068 | 4,623 | 1,138 | 1,231 | 1,176 | 1,249 | 1,351 |
| Tax % | 29 | 29 | 27 | 34 | 32 | 22 | 25 | 6 | 28 | 28 | 32 | 31 | |
| Net Profit | 616 | 700 | 804 | 694 | 847 | 762 | 803 | 4,357 | 823 | 883 | 801 | 860 | 937 |
| EPS in Rs | 7.23 | 8.20 | 9.42 | 8.13 | 9.95 | 9.14 | 9.53 | 51 | 9.68 | 10 | 9.35 | 10 | 11 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 10 | ||||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 30 | 29 | 25 | 30 | 24 | 45 | 21 | 4 | 21 | 19 | 21 | 20 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 7%
- 5 years
- 12%
- 3 years
- 6%
- TTM
- 8%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 2%
- 5 years
- 1%
- 3 years
- 2%
- TTM
- 11%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 8%
- 5 years
- 17%
- 3 years
- 16%
- 1 year
- 1%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 13%
- 5 years
- 13%
- 3 years
- 6%
- Last year
- 6%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 | 85 |
| Reserves | 3,756 | 4,305 | 4,947 | 5,344 | 6,022 | 6,382 | 7,187 | 10,499 | 11,047 | 12,801 | 13,828 | 13,820 |
| Borrowings | 58 | 115 | 187 | 60 | 89 | 196 | 509 | 520 | 588 | 1,123 | 2,017 | 1,575 |
| Other Liabilities | 9,989 | 10,866 | 12,546 | 14,326 | 16,235 | 17,549 | 20,625 | 2,799 | 3,037 | 4,140 | 5,459 | 5,737 |
| Minority Interest | 26 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 13,887 | 15,370 | 17,765 | 19,815 | 22,431 | 24,213 | 28,406 | 13,902 | 14,758 | 18,149 | 21,390 | 21,218 |
| Fixed Assets | 1,781 | 1,975 | 2,259 | 2,681 | 3,080 | 3,248 | 3,599 | 3,361 | 3,682 | 3,853 | 3,935 | 4,006 |
| CWIP | 115 | 192 | 149 | 241 | 300 | 405 | 431 | 341 | 525 | 1,352 | 3,643 | 4,198 |
| Investments | 8,817 | 10,446 | 11,884 | 12,490 | 14,328 | 15,816 | 18,807 | 5,558 | 5,106 | 5,940 | 6,468 | 6,131 |
| Other Assets | 3,175 | 2,757 | 3,474 | 4,402 | 4,723 | 4,744 | 5,570 | 4,642 | 5,444 | 7,004 | 7,343 | 6,882 |
| Total Assets | 13,887 | 15,370 | 17,765 | 19,815 | 22,431 | 24,213 | 28,406 | 13,902 | 14,758 | 18,149 | 21,390 | 21,218 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 180 | 1,583 | 937 | 914 | 1,687 | 1,619 | 2,263 | 61 | 768 | 1,533 | 1,273 | 2,413 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -61 | -1,329 | -727 | -535 | -1,438 | -1,097 | -2,082 | 66 | -799 | -1,458 | -1,934 | -1,551 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -199 | -167 | -182 | -386 | -217 | -532 | -170 | -172 | -30 | 108 | 515 | -805 |
| Net Cash Flow | -79 | 87 | 28 | -6 | 32 | -9 | 11 | -45 | -61 | 183 | -146 | 57 |
| Free Cash Flow | -149 | 1,161 | 497 | 108 | 1,001 | 1,024 | 1,771 | -603 | -217 | -338 | -652 | 1,293 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 27 | 28 | 24 | 31 | 31 | 27 | 38 | 31 | 30 | 30 | 36 | 32 |
| Inventory Days | 129 | 106 | 131 | 120 | 107 | 138 | 144 | 120 | 121 | 124 | 144 | 120 |
| Days Payable | 82 | 96 | 93 | 91 | 81 | 92 | 130 | 78 | 65 | 87 | 105 | 110 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 74 | 37 | 61 | 60 | 56 | 73 | 52 | 74 | 85 | 67 | 74 | 42 |
| Working Capital Days | 20 | -3 | 10 | 22 | 16 | 21 | -14 | 40 | 47 | 26 | 17 | 4 |
| ROCE % | 23 | 26 | 26 | 23 | 21 | 17 | 14 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 9 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
exports as % of revenue
5.00
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
3,35,77,523inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about Exide Industries Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
16 Aug, 18:05 IST · Company event · low impact
Ola Electric Mobility Limited has launched a product
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- barium sulphate
- carbon black
- lead & lead alloys
- lithium-ion cells (imported, pending EESL cell production)
- polypropylene (PP) / recycled PP granules / plastic
- recycled lead (from Chloride Metals end-of-life batteries)
- red lead
- separators
- sulphuric acid / battery electrolyte
Depends on the price of
- sulphuric_acid
Sells to
- Aftermarket / replacement (2W,3W,4W,e-rickshaw,UPS,solar) · replacement lead-acid + inverter/home-UPS + solar batteries (B2C)
- Ashok Leyland · commercial-vehicle lead-acid batteries (OEM)
- Atul Auto Limited · EESL lithium-ion battery customer (3W)
- Bajaj Auto · 2W/3W lead-acid batteries (OEM)
- Eicher Motors · 2W/CV lead-acid batteries (OEM)
- Hero MotoCorp · 2W lead-acid batteries (OEM)
- Hyundai Motor India Limited · automotive lead-acid batteries (OEM); EESL Li-ion MoU
- Indian Navy · submarine / defence batteries
- Industrial (telecom, railways, power, traction, data centers, industrial UPS, BESS) · industrial lead-acid + Li-ion stationary batteries
- Kia Corporation (South Korea) · EESL lithium-ion cells (non-binding MoU)
- Mahindra & Mahindra · automotive lead-acid SLI batteries (OEM)
- Maruti Suzuki India · automotive lead-acid SLI batteries (OEM)
- Tata Motors Limited · automotive lead-acid SLI batteries (OEM)
- Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Limited · automotive lead-acid SLI batteries (OEM)
Buys from
- Ducon Infratechnologies Limited · FGD system for a battery-breaking unit — MD&A milestone: 'India's first FGD in Battery Bre…
- Gravita India Limited · pure lead / lead alloys for lead-acid batteries
- Hindustan Zinc · SHG lead (lead-acid batteries)
- Honeywell Automation India Limited · Building automation (Enterprise Buildings Integrator)
- MODISON LIMITED · contact components for battery segment (concall-named)
- Neogen Chemicals Limited · lithium-ion battery electrolyte / electrolyte salts & additives
- Nile Limited · pure lead and lead alloys
- Pondy Oxides & Chemicals Limited · lead & lead alloys (battery OEM)
- SIS LIMITED · cleaning project / facility management services (seed default-kept: NSE-resolved)
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Automobile and Auto Components
- Industry
- Auto Components & Equipments
- Classification
- Automobile and Auto Components › Auto Components & Equipments
- ISIN
- INE302A01020
Plants
- Ahmednagar · Ahmednagar, Maharashtra
- Bawal
- Chinchwad
- Chloride Metals (CML) lead recycling - Haldia
- Chloride Metals (CML) lead recycling - Malur/Markal
- Chloride Metals (CML) lead recycling - Supa
- Exide Energy Solutions (EESL) Li-ion gigafactory
- Haldia
- Haridwar
- Hosur · Hosur, Tamil Nadu
- Prantij
- Roorkee
- Shyamnagar (Shamnagar)
- Taloja · Taloja, Maharashtra
News impact
Big market events that reach Exide Industries Limited, and how the effect spreads.
1 Oct, 19:39 IST · Market event · high impact
Tata nearly doubles EV registrations, Mahindra overtakes MG in September
India's electric-car registrations nearly doubled in September as Tata surged and Mahindra passed MG, helping Tata, Mahindra and EV-parts makers while MG and petrol-engine parts suppliers lose ground.
Who it hits first
- India's electric-vehicle registrations rose 94.7% from a year earlier in September, Vahan data show, meaning nearly twice as many EVs hit the road.
- Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles, Tata's carmaking arm, nearly doubled its EV registrations, cementing its lead in electric cars.
- Mahindra & Mahindra, which makes SUVs and electric vehicles, overtook MG Motor to take second place in the month's EV sales.
- MG Motor, which is not listed in India, lost rank even in a growing market, a share loss rather than a demand loss.
- The Tata Motors parent ticker (TATAMOTORS) has a fundamentals row but no candidate row, so no signal is emitted for it.
- Suppliers named in the pack - Bosch and Motherson to both carmakers, Exide and Sona BLW to Mahindra - see stronger component demand.
Who may gain
- Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles - near-double EV volumes
- Mahindra & Mahindra - EV share win over MG
- Olectra - EV sentiment as a listed electric-vehicle competitor
- Exide Industries - battery demand via Mahindra
- Samvardhana Motherson and Bosch - parts demand from both carmakers
- Sona BLW - EV driveline demand via Mahindra
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, dealers such as Landmark handle more EV deliveries, Tata Power and other chargers sell more electricity, and fleet buyers get cheaper electric running; the pack lists no factory customer between the carmakers and drivers.
Upstream
Upstream, Bosch and Samvardhana Motherson feed both Tata and Mahindra, while Exide (batteries), Sona BLW (driveline) and a long tail of listed suppliers feed Mahindra; Tata Steel and Hindalco metal goes into every car body.
Where demand moves
Business
Car buyers chose electric models in record numbers, so dealers place bigger EV orders with Tata and Mahindra, who pull more batteries, wiring, electronics and driveline parts from Exide, Motherson, Bosch and Sona BLW; charging use rises with more EVs on the road.
Capital
Investors rotate toward confirmed EV winners and their suppliers, bidding up Tata's passenger-vehicle arm, Mahindra and EV-parts makers, while money drifts from engine-only parts makers like piston and forging shops.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
EV makers and EV-parts suppliers gain volumes; engine-only parts (pistons, forgings) face mix pressure as electric share rises.
Oil & Gas
Every electric kilometre displaces petrol and diesel, a small softening signal for fuel sellers.
Power
More EVs mean more charging demand, helping power sellers and charging networks such as Tata Power.
Renewable
Prose only (not in catalog): stronger EV growth supports the case for green charging and solar tie-ups.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- EV registrations +94.7% → Tata/Mahindra EV sales jump
- More EVs → higher charging demand → Power sellers gain
- More EVs → fewer petrol/diesel km → fuel demand softens
- Green charging pull → Renewable support (prose only)
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Patterns
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Oil & Gas
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1-7 days, EV-exposed auto shares firm on the Vahan numbers; Tata's passenger arm and Mahindra lead, suppliers follow.
Medium term
In 1-6 months, sustained EV share forces bigger battery and component orders, while engine-parts makers feel the mix shift.
Short term
In 1-4 weeks, October registration tracking and festive sales decide whether September was a trend or a one-off.
30 Sept, 10:18 IST · Market event · high impact
CAFE III fuel efficiency norms notified for cars
India tightened car fuel rules through FY32, helping Maruti's small cars and Tata's electrics while pushing SUV-heavy Mahindra and parts makers to spend more.
Who it hits first
- India notified final CAFE III efficiency rules for M1 passenger cars, tightening fleet carbon dioxide nearly 17% through FY32 with yearly targets.
- One electric car counts as three cars toward the target, and wider credits for hybrid, CNG and ethanol cars give makers cheaper ways to comply.
- Maruti Suzuki, the small-car leader, starts advantaged on light cars, while Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles and Mahindra & Mahindra lean on electric and hybrid credits to offset bigger vehicles.
Who may gain
- Maruti Suzuki India (small cars and CNG models that lower fleet averages)
- Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles (electric cars that count three-for-one)
- Suppliers of efficiency and electric parts like Bosch Limited and Sona BLW Precision Forgings
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Dealers and lenders like Mahindra Finance feel second-order effects as sticker prices rise with new tech, shifting mix toward small and electric cars but not changing total finance demand much.
Upstream
Parts makers that feed Maruti, Mahindra and Tata Motors — Bosch for fuel systems, Motherson for wiring, Sona for driveline gear, Exide for batteries — see more orders for efficiency and hybrid content.
Where demand moves
Business
Car buyers still want affordable small cars and electrics, so showroom demand tilts to Maruti's light models and Tata's electrics, while makers order more fuel-saving parts, sensors and batteries from suppliers.
Capital
Investors rotate toward small-car and EV-credit winners and efficiency suppliers, trimming exposure to SUV-heavy lineups facing higher compliance spend through FY32.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Compliance costs rise unevenly; small-car and EV-credit holders gain share while SUV-heavy fleets spend more through FY32.
Financial Services
Vehicle lenders see mixed loan size versus volume as car prices rise, roughly neutral near term.
Power
More electrics over time lift charging demand, a slow positive for power sellers like Tata Power and NTPC.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- CAFE III M1 CO2 -17% by FY32 → carmakers add hybrids and EVs
- One EV counts as three → EV share push for compliance
- Battery and charging use rises → Power demand up slowly
- Petrol use per car falls → Oil demand eases at margin
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Patterns
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Oil & Gas
- Power
When it plays out
Immediate
Shares of Maruti and EV-credit names firm on headlines while SUV-heavy makers wobble as analysts map yearly CO2 steps.
Medium term
Fleet mixes shift toward lighter and electrified models, and charging and battery orders build if EV sales respond to the three-for-one math.
Short term
Suppliers guide on efficiency-kit orders and carmakers outline hybrid, CNG and EV compliance plans for FY32.
28 Sept, 17:39 IST · Market event · high impact
Switch Mobility secures order for 840 e-buses for Delhi under PM E-Drive
Switch Mobility, Ashok Leyland's e-bus unit, won an 840-bus Delhi order, helping Ashok Leyland and parts suppliers slightly while rival bus makers miss out and others stay flat.
Who it hits first
- Switch Mobility, the electric-bus unit of truck and bus maker Ashok Leyland, won an order for 840 electric buses for Delhi under PM E-Drive.
- The order covers 420 nine-metre and 420 twelve-metre air-conditioned electric buses, placed via Antony Road Transport Solutions for the Delhi Transport Corporation.
Who may gain
- Ashok Leyland shareholders, whose e-bus unit gains 840 buses of order inflow
- Battery and parts suppliers to Ashok Leyland, which could see small follow-on orders for batteries, electrical parts, and suspension
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, Antony Road Transport Solutions places the order and the Delhi Transport Corporation deploys the 840 buses for public transport in Delhi.
Upstream
Upstream, Ashok Leyland's suppliers of batteries, electrical parts, forgings, tyres, and steel stand to feed the 840-bus build, though each supplier's share is small.
Where demand moves
Business
New business demand flows to Switch Mobility and Ashok Leyland for 840 electric buses, with a thin trickle to battery, electrical, and suspension suppliers; rival bus makers win nothing from this round.
Capital
Capital flow should favour Ashok Leyland shares modestly on the order news, with light sympathy buying in e-bus suppliers and mild pressure on rival bus makers that missed out.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Mild positive readthrough for e-bus and EV suppliers on the 840-bus Delhi order, while rival commercial-vehicle makers see a small competitive miss; the wider auto sector is unaffected.
When it plays out
Immediate
In 1–7 days Ashok Leyland shares react to the 840-bus win while rivals and suppliers adjust modestly.
Medium term
In 1–6 months execution and any follow-on Delhi e-bus lots decide whether this win grows into a bigger order book.
Short term
In 1–4 weeks focus shifts to delivery timelines, pricing, and margins on the 420 nine-metre and 420 twelve-metre buses.
25 Sept, 21:54 IST · Market event · medium impact
Electric two-wheeler penetration nears 10%; Centre allocates ₹776 crore to upgrade EV testing infrastructure
The government stretched e-scooter subsidies to March 2028 and funded testing labs with Rs 776 crore, helping e-scooter makers and parts suppliers while petrol-only two-wheeler lines face tougher rivalry.
Who it hits first
- Electric two-wheelers (battery scooters and bikes) now make up nearly one in ten two-wheelers sold, and the Centre has stretched PM E-Drive buyer subsidies to March 2028 with a target of 45.8 lakh electric two-wheelers.
- The Centre is also spending Rs 776 crore to upgrade electric-vehicle testing labs, which should speed up approvals and build buyer trust in new models.
- That lifts demand for electric-scooter makers such as Ola Electric, TVS Motor, Bajaj Auto and Hero MotoCorp, and for the parts makers that supply them.
Who may gain
- Ola Electric, a pure electric-scooter maker, gets the most direct lift since every subsidised buyer is its customer.
- TVS Motor, Bajaj Auto and Hero MotoCorp, the big two-wheeler makers that now sell electric scooters alongside petrol bikes, gain showroom demand from longer subsidies.
- Parts makers named as suppliers in the pack, such as Gabriel India, Minda Corporation, Uno Minda, Endurance Technologies and Exide Industries, gain order volumes as scooter output rises.
- Ather Energy, another electric-scooter rival tied to the seeds by competition edges, also benefits, but the ten-signal limit means no formal signal is written for it.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, buyers gain cheaper electric scooters through longer subsidies and dealers gain footfall, though the pack names no dealer or customer company to track.
Upstream
Upstream parts makers named as suppliers to the four seeds — Gabriel India, Minda Corporation, Uno Minda, Endurance Technologies, Sedemac Mechatronics and battery maker Exide Industries — see bigger order books as scooter output grows.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand rises first at scooter showrooms as subsidies to March 2028 cut buyer prices toward the 45.8 lakh target, then flows back to parts makers through larger orders for brakes, wiring, lights and batteries.
Capital
Capital follows the subsidy visibility: investors favour two-wheeler makers and their suppliers on multi-year volume hopes, while the Rs 776 crore testing-lab spend pulls construction and equipment money into lab projects.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Positive: longer subsidies to March 2028 and a 45.8 lakh target directly lift two-wheeler volumes and parts orders.
Capital Goods
Mild positive: Rs 776 crore for testing labs pulls equipment and construction orders.
Power
Mild positive second-order effect: more electric scooters mean more charging demand over time for power sellers.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- PM E-Drive incentives to Mar 2028 → e-2W sales toward 45.8 lakh target
- Higher e-2W volumes → parts orders for 2W suppliers
- Rs 776 cr testing-infra spend → lab equipment and construction orders
Pattern name
Govt Capex Cascade
Patterns
- Govt Capex Cascade
- Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Auto
- Banking
- Capital Goods
- Cement
- Infrastructure
- Oil & Gas
- Power
- Steel
When it plays out
Immediate
Two-wheeler and supplier shares react to the subsidy extension within days as buyers restock.
Medium term
Volumes build toward the 45.8 lakh target over 1–6 months while testing-lab upgrades speed launches.
Short term
Scooter bookings pick up over 1–4 weeks as subsidised prices pull buyers into showrooms.
5 Sept, 04:29 IST · Market event · medium impact
Central Electricity Authority draft would make co-located battery storage of at least 10% of capacity mandatory for solar and wind projects commissioned from July 2027, rising to four-hour duration by 2029-31
India's power regulator wants every new solar and wind farm to come with its own batteries so the electricity can be stored and released when needed - which costs developers more to build but creates a large new market for battery and grid-equipment makers.
Who it hits first
- Every developer of new solar and wind capacity in India - NTPC Green, Adani Green, ACME Solar, JSW Energy, Tata Power and their unlisted peers - would have to buy and install batteries worth at least 10% of project capacity
- Project cost per megawatt rises, which changes bid tariffs on every tender awarded from now on for projects commissioning after July 2027
Who may gain
- Battery, power-conversion-system and grid-forming inverter makers such as HBL Engineering, Amara Raja and Exide, who gain a compulsory rather than optional market
- Electrical equipment makers supplying switchyards, transformers and protection systems for the additional battery yards
- Developers that already own storage capability or manufacture the equipment, notably Tata Power and JSW Energy
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Distribution companies and the grid operator get firmer, more predictable renewable supply, which reduces their need to buy expensive evening peak power and lowers the amount of thermal capacity they must keep on standby.
Upstream
Lithium cells, battery management systems, thermal management, enclosures, power conversion systems and grid-forming inverters all see step-change demand; most cells are still imported, so this widens India's battery import bill until domestic cell capacity from Amara Raja, Exide and others ramps up.
Where demand moves
Business
The rule creates demand that does not exist today: batteries equal to 10% of every new solar and wind project, stepping up to four-hour duration for 2029-31 commissioning. That demand flows first to cell and pack suppliers and power-conversion-system makers, then to the electrical balance-of-plant chain - switchgear, transformers, protection relays, cabling - and then to civil contractors building the battery yards. Working the other way, demand is destroyed for diesel and gas peaking capacity, because stored solar power displaces the expensive evening top-up generation the grid buys today.
Capital
Money should rotate from pure renewable developers, whose capex per megawatt rises before tariffs catch up, towards the equipment makers who capture that spend as revenue; because this is a draft under consultation until 4 October, the rotation is likely to be gradual and to reverse partially if the requirement is diluted in the final notification.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
battery, inverter, switchgear and transformer makers gain a compulsory new order stream
Metals & Mining
lithium, nickel, copper and aluminium content per megawatt of renewable capacity rises materially
Power
renewable developers absorb higher capex up front but win firmer, better-priced dispatchable tariffs later; thermal peaking economics weaken
codex additions
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Mandatory co-located storage from July 2027
- Renewable project capex per megawatt rises about 10-15%
- Battery, power-conversion-system and grid-forming inverter demand steps up
- Firm dispatchable renewable supply displaces evening peaking generation
- Thermal peaking and diesel backup economics weaken over the medium term
Pattern name
Energy Transition Cascade
Sectors queried
- Power
- Capital Goods
- Metals & Mining
- Automobile and Auto Components
When it plays out
Immediate
Battery and grid-equipment names get a sentiment lift; developers face a modest cost overhang, but nothing binds until the rule is notified.
Medium term
If notified as drafted, every renewable tender bid from 2027 carries storage in the tariff, and the 2029-31 four-hour step creates a second, larger order wave.
Short term
The comment window closes on 4 October - watch developer associations lobbying to dilute the 10% requirement or push out the July 2027 date.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Mandatory co-located BESS raises domestic demand for cells, battery packs, thermal management, enclosures and battery-management systems beyond EV demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["EXIDEIND","ARE\u0026M","HBLPOWER"],"magnitude":"large","notes":"Benefit strongest if developers prefer domestic sourcing or PLI-linked suppliers. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Battery manufacturing / auto ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"More battery installations increase demand for electrolyte salts, solvents, binders, separators, fluorochemicals and other battery-grade chemicals.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","SRF","FLUOROCHEM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Link depends on how much of the battery supply chain localizes in India versus imported cells/packs. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Specialty chemicals","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Higher renewable project capex increases debt requirement, refinancing needs and structured lending for hybrid renewable-plus-storage assets.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["PFC","RECLTD","IREDA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Credit risk may also rise for weaker developers if tariffs do not compensate for storage capex. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Financial services / project finance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"BESS co-location requires extra civil works, switchyards, protection systems, evacuation upgrades and grid-interface engineering at renewable sites.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","KEC","KALPATARU"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Some benefit overlaps with capital goods, but construction and grid-integration EPC are separate ripple channels. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Infrastructure construction / transmission EPC","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Storage mandates increase need for forecasting, energy-management systems, SCADA integration, grid-forming controls, dispatch optimization and digital O\u0026M.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","LTTS","KPITTECH"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More likely a second-order benefit through utilities, OEMs and renewable operators than a direct revenue shock. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"IT services / energy software","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"BESS containers, imported cells, power electronics and heavy electrical equipment raise project cargo movement through ports, roads and container logistics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","TCIEXP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude depends on import share and pace of project ordering before the July 2027 cutoff. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Logistics / ports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Co-located batteries add fire, thermal runaway, warranty, business interruption and performance-risk exposure, increasing need for project insurance and risk engineering.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ICICIGI","GICRE","NIACL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Premium opportunity may be partly offset by higher underwriting caution for BESS-heavy assets. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Insurance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"More grid-scale storage can reduce future reliance on gas or liquid-fuel peaking and backup generation, though gas may still be used for longer-duration balancing.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["GAIL","PETRONET","IGL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative for long-term peaking-fuel optionality; neutral to mildly positive if gas remains a complement for multi-hour or seasonal balancing. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Oil \u0026 gas / gas utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Additional BESS yards, foundations, control rooms, roads, fencing and substations modestly increase construction-material intensity per renewable project.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","AMBUJACEM","JKCEMENT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"A diffuse third-order effect, but defensible for large solar and wind parks adding storage infrastructure. [Suggested by Codex Layer 5.5]","sector":"Cement and building materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 3 Jul 2026 | unspecified | ₹2 |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Jul 2025 | unspecified | ₹2 |
| 22 Jul 2024 | unspecified | ₹2 |
| 1 Aug 2023 | unspecified | ₹2 |
| 7 Feb 2022 | interim | ₹2 |
| 4 Feb 2021 | interim | ₹2 |
| 4 Mar 2020 | interim | ₹2.5 |
| 18 Nov 2019 | unspecified | ₹1.6 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call3 Aug 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Annual report · 2025-2616 Jun 2026
- Earnings call6 May 2026
- Earnings call3 Feb 2026
- Earnings call17 Nov 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.