Meghmani Organics Limited
NSE: MOLPesticides & Agrochemicals
Share price
₹58.41
+1.16% close of 9 Oct 2026
Price-based ratios (P/B, dividend yield, EV/EBITDA) are as of 8 Oct 2026, the close above is 9 Oct 2026.
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
49
out of 100 · worked out 9 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹1,460 Cr
P/E ratio
22.8
P/B ratio
1.0
ROCE
6.7%
ROE
1.9%
Dividend yield
0.0%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales fell 7.7% over the past year. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 15.0% to 9.7% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 0.6% a year against a sector median of 10.2% — 9.5 percentage points slower.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
Too little price history yet to compare it with its own past.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Its earnings are falling, so growth cannot justify the price.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meghmani Organics Limited — this one | -49%/yr | 22.8× | — |
| UPL Limited | -21%/yr | 20.9× | — |
| PI Industries Limited | -1%/yr | 29.4× | — |
| Sumitomo Chemical India Limited | 2%/yr | 36.4× | ₹18.2 |
| Bayer Cropscience Limited | 1%/yr | 21.4× | ₹21.4 |
| Sharda Cropchem Limited | 26%/yr | 10.4× | ₹0.40 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Pesticides & Agrochemicals), it ranks 18 of 23 on returns, 23 of 23 on growth, 20 of 23 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
No durable advantage shows in the numbers: it earns 6.7% on capital, ahead of 22% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
No — Over the last five years it made ₹807 crore of cash from the business but spent ₹1099 crore on plant and equipment, ₹292 crore more than it made, paid from its own cash and investments. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 7 years, about 147 arrived as cash (before interest, which is why it can exceed the profit). Its cash comes back faster than it used to: it went from being waiting 57 days for its cash to waiting 10 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
8 of 10 checks clear · 80%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Announced 29 Jul 2026 · Consolidated
Revenue
₹543 Cr
Revenue vs last year
-11.5%
Revenue vs last quarter
+14.4%
Net profit
₹48 Cr
Profit vs last year
+280.1%
Profit vs last quarter
+500.2%
Net margin
8.9%
EPS
₹1.90
Earnings call transcript · 30 Jul 2026
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹1,460 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹58.41
- 52w High
- ₹83.4
- 52w Low
- ₹36.5
- Enterprise value
- ₹2,160 Cr
- Beta
- 1.7
- Price CAGR 1y
- -26.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- -8.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- -13.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- —
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 1.0%
- PEG ratio
- -0.5
- P/E ratio
- 22.8
- P/B ratio
- 1.0
- EV / EBITDA
- 10.4
- Industry P/E
- 20.1
- ROCE
- 6.7%
- ROCE 5y average
- 9.4%
- ROE
- 1.9%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.5
- Interest coverage
- 1.7
- Dividend yield
- 0.0%
- ROE 3y average
- -2.0%
- ROE last year
- 2.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹2,174 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹29 Cr
- Operating margin
- 8.0%
- Net profit margin
- 1.3%
- EBITDA margin
- 8.2%
- Sales growth 3y
- -5.2%
- Sales growth 5y
- 5.8%
- Profit growth 3y
- -49.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- -31.0%
- EPS
- ₹1.1
- Sales growth TTM
- -8.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 241.0%
- Dividend payout
- 0.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹543 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹48 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- -11.5%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 269.2%
- OPM latest quarter
- 18.0%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹61.8
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹726 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹25 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹726 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 60.8
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹222 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹178 Cr
- FCF yield
- 5.9%
- Net cash flow
- -₹7 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 49.0%
- FII holding
- 0.9%
- DII holding
- 0.0%
- Public holding
- 50.1%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPL | 483.75 | 20.6 | 40,824 | 1.21 | -73.0 | 92.6 | 10,181.0 | 10.5 | 10.1 |
| P I Industries | 2,144.30 | 30.1 | 32,533 | 0.68 | 244.2 | -39.0 | 1,702.3 | -10.4 | 15.0 |
| Sumitomo Chemi. | 418.40 | 36.6 | 20,884 | 0.31 | 216.5 | 9.3 | 1,054.1 | 0.6 | 23.5 |
| Bayer Crop Sci. | 3,453.30 | 21.2 | 15,520 | 4.35 | 321.6 | 15.4 | 1,835.0 | -4.2 | 29.1 |
| Sharda Cropchem | 729.85 | 10.5 | 6,585 | 2.05 | 88.0 | -38.3 | 1,073.8 | 9.0 | 30.3 |
| Dhanuka Agritech | 899.35 | 14.9 | 4,009 | 0.22 | 36.3 | -34.6 | 461.9 | -12.6 | 23.8 |
| Rallis India | 197.00 | 16.8 | 3,831 | 1.52 | 125.0 | 30.0 | 1,022.0 | 6.8 | 14.1 |
| Meghmani Organi. | 58.95 | 23.3 | 1,499 | 0.00 | 48.2 | 280.1 | 542.8 | -11.5 | 6.7 |
| Median | 307.20 | 20.7 | 1,611 | 0.17 | 24.6 | 16.8 | 383.7 | -2.3 | 15.4 |
Competes with: Bayer Cropscience Limited, Dhanuka Agritech Limited, NACL Industries Limited, PI Industries Limited, Rallis India Limited, Sharda Cropchem Limited, Sumitomo Chemical India Limited, UPL Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 426 | 379 | 352 | 410 | 414 | 544 | 569 | 553 | 614 | 577 | 509 | 474 | 543 |
| Expenses | 448 | 371 | 360 | 408 | 408 | 513 | 528 | 488 | 547 | 525 | 471 | 455 | 445 |
| Material Cost | 291 | 316 | 350 | 319 | 262 | 301 | |||||||
| Change in Inventories | 22 | 46 | -13 | -20 | 27 | -28 | |||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | -0.68 | 16 | 5.12 | 5.28 | 11 | 17 | |||||||
| Employee Cost | 30 | 30 | 37 | 37 | 32 | 34 | |||||||
| Other Expenses | 147 | 139 | 146 | 130 | 121 | 121 | |||||||
| Operating Profit | -22 | 8 | -8 | 2 | 6 | 31 | 41 | 65 | 67 | 52 | 38 | 20 | 98 |
| OPM % | -5.19 | 2 | -2.22 | 0.49 | 1.42 | 5.62 | 7.18 | 12 | 11 | 9.02 | 7.42 | 4.16 | 18 |
| Other Income | 7 | 12 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 28 | 15 | 37 | 12 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
| Interest | 4 | 13 | 27 | 2 | 11 | 26 | 13 | 19 | 29 | 24 | 18 | 20 | 13 |
| Depreciation | 24 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 29 | 30 |
| Profit before tax | -43 | -16 | -48 | -14 | -19 | -9 | 7 | 31 | 24 | 26 | 4 | 7 | 67 |
| Tax % | -20 | -3 | -20 | 25 | -13 | 1 | 159 | 35 | 48 | 56 | 179 | -12 | 28 |
| Net Profit | -34 | -15 | -38 | -18 | -17 | -9 | -4 | 20 | 13 | 12 | -4 | 8 | 48 |
| EPS in Rs | -1.36 | -0.60 | -1.50 | -0.71 | -0.66 | -0.36 | -0.17 | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.45 | -0.14 | 0.32 | 1.89 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 0.78 | 0.50 | 0.45 | -0.14 | 0.32 | 1.90 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 6m | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 700 | 1,637 | 2,498 | 2,553 | 1,566 | 2,080 | 2,174 | 2,103 |
| Expenses | 595 | 1,353 | 2,119 | 2,211 | 1,586 | 1,936 | 1,996 | 1,896 |
| Material Cost | 1,286 | 1,248 | ||||||
| Change in Inventories | -38 | 40 | ||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 16 | 38 | ||||||
| Employee Cost | 114 | 135 | ||||||
| Other Expenses | 559 | 536 | ||||||
| Operating Profit | 105 | 283 | 379 | 342 | -19 | 144 | 178 | 207 |
| OPM % | 15 | 17 | 15 | 13 | -1.20 | 7 | 8 | 10 |
| Other Income | 130 | 30 | 102 | 114 | 37 | 42 | 95 | 92 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| Interest | 18 | 11 | 9 | 66 | 46 | 69 | 92 | 75 |
| Depreciation | 22 | 51 | 63 | 77 | 92 | 108 | 119 | 119 |
| Profit before tax | 194 | 252 | 409 | 313 | -121 | 9.47 | 62 | 105 |
| Tax % | 23 | 26 | 26 | 24 | -12 | 212 | 54 | |
| Net Profit | 150 | 186 | 304 | 238 | -106 | -11 | 29 | 64 |
| EPS in Rs | 29,914 | 37,296 | 12 | 9.35 | -4.17 | -0.42 | 1.13 | 2.52 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | -0.42 | 1.13 | ||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 17 | 19 | 12 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 6%
- 3 years
- -5%
- TTM
- -8%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -31%
- 3 years
- -49%
- TTM
- 241%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- -13%
- 3 years
- -8%
- 1 year
- -26%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- —
- 5 years
- 6%
- 3 years
- -2%
- Last year
- 2%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Reserves | 961 | 1,148 | 1,441 | 1,644 | 1,502 | 1,490 | 1,519 |
| Borrowings | 264 | 268 | 499 | 824 | 837 | 829 | 726 |
| Other Liabilities | 407 | 533 | 832 | 705 | 676 | 741 | 750 |
| Minority Interest | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Total Liabilities | 1,657 | 1,974 | 2,798 | 3,198 | 3,040 | 3,085 | 3,021 |
| Fixed Assets | 481 | 634 | 911 | 1,166 | 1,152 | 1,575 | 1,494 |
| CWIP | 101 | 112 | 188 | 356 | 521 | 83 | 87 |
| Investments | 191 | 304 | 211 | 183 | 114 | 3 | 5 |
| Other Assets | 885 | 924 | 1,487 | 1,494 | 1,253 | 1,425 | 1,435 |
| Total Assets | 1,657 | 1,974 | 2,798 | 3,198 | 3,039 | 3,085 | 3,021 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 22 | 333 | 65 | 204 | 250 | 66 | 222 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | 13 | -307 | -133 | -418 | -178 | 31 | -38 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -26 | -14 | 58 | 234 | -85 | -91 | -190 |
| Net Cash Flow | 8 | 12 | -10 | 21 | -14 | 6 | -7 |
| Free Cash Flow | -49 | 124 | -177 | -259 | -14 | -20 | 178 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 241 | 92 | 79 | 75 | 101 | 99 | 113 |
| Inventory Days | 271 | 152 | 161 | 158 | 185 | 173 | 145 |
| Days Payable | 209 | 137 | 144 | 108 | 176 | 159 | 149 |
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 302 | 106 | 96 | 124 | 109 | 113 | 110 |
| Working Capital Days | 152 | 57 | 57 | 53 | 28 | 20 | 10 |
| ROCE % | 19 | 24 | 16 | -3 | 3 | 7 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
exports as % of revenue
76.80
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
700inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
1,82,05,512inr
2026-03-31
volume growth %
-17.00pct
2026-06-30
News
News and filings about Meghmani Organics Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Uses as raw material
- Chlorine
- Copper sulphate
- Phthalic anhydride
- Sulphur
Depends on the price of
- copper
- sulphuric_acid
Buys from
- Heranba Industries Limited · Agrochemical technicals
Sells to
- Sudarshan Chemical Industries Limited · Phthalocyanine (CPC) blue pigment / intermediates
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Chemicals
- Industry
- Pesticides & Agrochemicals
- Classification
- Chemicals › Pesticides & Agrochemicals
- ISIN
- INE0CT101020
Business segments
- Agrochemicals · 73%
- Pigment · 24%
- Others · 3%
Plants
- Ankleshwar Plant (Crop Protection) · Ankleshwar, Gujarat
- Dahej Plant (Crop Protection) · Dahej, Gujarat
- Dahej SEZ Plant (Pigments) · Dahej, Gujarat
- Panoli Plant (Crop Protection Formulations) · Panoli, Gujarat
- Sanand Plant (Crop Nutrition) · Sanand, Gujarat
- Vatva Plant (Pigments) · Ahmedabad, Gujarat
News impact
Big market events that reach Meghmani Organics Limited, and how the effect spreads.
23 Sept, 07:38 IST · Market event · medium impact
India starts anti-dumping probe into Chinese Glycine imports
India is probing cheap Chinese glycine imports, which could help home chemical makers later but may raise costs for food, drug and farm buyers if an import tax follows.
Who it hits first
- India's trade investigator (DGTR, the body that checks unfair imports) opened a probe into cheap glycine, a simple chemical used in food, drugs and farm sprays, arriving from China.
- If the probe finds harm to local makers, India can add an import tax (anti-dumping duty) that makes Chinese glycine costlier and helps home producers sell more.
- No listed glycine maker is named in the evidence, so any stock lift today is hope of future protection, while buyers of glycine could later pay more.
Who may gain
- Indian glycine and nearby specialty makers, if a duty lifts local prices (no single listed maker confirmed in the pack)
- Farm-chemical sellers such as PI Industries and GSP Crop, if protection spreads to agro inputs
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Indian food, drug and farm-spray makers that buy glycine could face higher input costs if cheap Chinese supply is taxed.
Upstream
Chinese glycine exporters face the probe; if a duty follows, their shipments to India shrink.
Where demand moves
Business
No extra orders yet — the probe only starts the case; real business gain comes months later if a duty curbs Chinese supply and buyers switch to home makers.
Capital
No fresh funds flow; investors may bid up chemical shares on protection hopes, but cash gains arrive only if duties lift prices and profits.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Small positive mood for home makers on protection hopes; real gains only if a duty lands.
Pharma
Mild cost worry since glycine feeds drugs; dearer supply would squeeze pill makers later.
Textiles
Negligible near-term link; fibre makers watch only for broader China-duty mood.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- DGTR probes Chinese glycine dumping → possible import duty
- Duty curbs cheap imports → domestic glycine prices firm
- Chemical makers gain share → pharma and textile buyers face higher costs
Pattern name
China Cascade
Patterns
- China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Pharma
- Textiles
When it plays out
Immediate
1–7 days: chemical shares drift on protection hopes with no order change.
Medium term
1–6 months: probe findings decide any duty; only then do prices, orders and margins move.
Short term
1–4 weeks: filings and hearing news set expectations; buyers watch for price hints.
15 Sept, 18:45 IST · Market event · medium impact
India, China start discussions on trade concerns
India and China have started fresh trade talks, but with nothing agreed yet no company gains or loses; chemical and metal makers face import risk while drug and electronics firms could gain cheaper inputs if deals follow.
Who it hits first
- India and China have started a fresh round of talks on trade concerns and supply chains, with more meetings expected. Nothing has been agreed or changed yet - no duties cut, no bans lifted, no orders signed - so no listed company gains or loses any business today. The companies most exposed if talks eventually change the rules are chemical makers facing Chinese imports, drug makers buying Chinese raw materials, metal makers watched for dumping, textile traders, and electronics firms using Chinese parts.
Who may gain
- Nobody benefits yet - talks alone create no winners. If later rounds cut import friction, Indian buyers of Chinese inputs (drug makers needing bulk drugs, electronics assemblers needing parts) would pay less and earn more. If talks instead tighten protections, domestic chemical and metal makers shielded from Chinese goods would gain pricing power. Both paths are months away at best.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Indian makers that consume Chinese inputs - drug formulators, electronics assemblers, pigment and dye users - could see lower input costs months from now if barriers fall; until then their supply and costs are unchanged.
Upstream
Chinese suppliers of raw materials (bulk drugs, electronic parts, specialty chemicals) could see steadier Indian demand if ties normalize, but no purchase-order changes until deals are signed.
Where demand moves
Business
No business demand moves yet: no buyer has new orders and no supplier has lost any, because the talks changed no rule. The path to watch is import policy - easier Chinese imports would shift orders from Indian chemical and carbon-black makers toward Chinese suppliers, while tighter rules would do the reverse.
Capital
No capital rotation is warranted on talks alone; money typically waits for duty or policy outcomes. At most, a light sympathy bid may touch large China-exposed importers, while domestic producers facing import risk may see mild caution selling - both likely to fade within days without follow-up news.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Pigment, dye and carbon-black makers compete directly with Chinese imports, so any easing of duties would squeeze their prices; no change yet.
Consumer Durables
Electronics assemblers using Chinese parts could gain cheaper inputs over time; gold jewellery has almost no China linkage.
Healthcare
Drug makers rely on Chinese bulk-drug imports, so smoother ties could slowly lower input costs; no change yet.
Metals & Mining
Steel and metal makers stay on dumping watch; talks could loosen or tighten the shield, direction unknown.
Textiles
Yarn and fabric trade flows both ways, so normalized ties are mildly helpful; nothing concrete yet.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- Talks reopen - no duty or policy change yet
- Chemicals: pigment, dye and carbon-black makers face Chinese import risk if barriers ease
- Healthcare: drug formulators could gain cheaper bulk-drug inputs over time
- Metals & Mining: steel dumping watch stays either way
- Textiles and electronics: two-way trade mildly helped by normalized ties
Pattern name
China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Chemicals
- Healthcare
- Metals & Mining
- Textiles
- Consumer Durables
When it plays out
Immediate
In the next 1-7 days expect sentiment-only noise of about 1-2% on the most exposed names, fading fast without follow-up headlines.
Medium term
Over 1-6 months, if deals are struck, duty changes could move chemical, metal and drug stocks several percent; if talks stall, the story dies with no trace.
Short term
Over 1-4 weeks watch meeting readouts for any mention of duties, import curbs or market access - that is what would turn this story into real signals.
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
White House names India a Tier-1 hub in China's shadow transshipment network, with $67bn routed via India, Mexico and Vietnam in 2025
The White House has publicly accused India of being one of the top three places where Chinese goods are re-routed to dodge US tariffs, and says new US trade deals will police this - which means slower US customs clearance and more paperwork for Indian exporters, especially small electronics, chemical and jewellery firms that sell mainly to America.
Who it hits first
- The White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy has published a report naming India a Tier-1 hub in what it calls China's shadow transshipment network - meaning Chinese goods being routed through India to avoid US tariffs. The report puts $67 billion of transshipment through India, Mexico and Vietnam in 2025, costing the US $28 billion in tariff revenue. Trade adviser Peter Navarro named India directly, and anti-transshipment clauses will now be written into every new US trade deal. This lands in the middle of India-US tariff negotiations that were already complicated by US pressure over India's Russian oil purchases. Indian exporters to the US face more origin documentation, slower customs clearance and a harder negotiating backdrop.
Who may gain
- Exporters with fully domestic supply chains and verifiable origin paperwork, which can now differentiate themselves from competitors that rely on Chinese inputs.
- Testing, inspection and certification providers, and customs and trade-compliance software vendors, whose services become mandatory rather than optional.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
US buyers of Indian goods face longer lead times and possible retroactive duty demands if origin is later challenged, so some will hold larger safety stock and others will dual-source outside India. Indian exporters' order books therefore see slower conversion rather than outright cancellation.
Upstream
Indian exporters that buy Chinese intermediates - dyes, pigments, aroma chemicals and electronic components - must now trace and document those purchases, which raises compliance cost and may force some to switch to costlier domestic or third-country suppliers. That is a demand transfer towards Indian intermediate makers over the next two to four quarters.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing physically stops moving, but the cost and time of moving it rises. Indian exporters must now document the origin of components on more shipments, which lengthens the cash cycle and ties up working capital. Demand does not disappear - it shifts towards exporters that can prove domestic content, and away from those whose products contain significant Chinese intermediates. Electronics assemblers and specialty chemical makers that buy Chinese inputs are most exposed; aerospace suppliers, whose origin rules were already strict and pre-audited, are least exposed.
Capital
Money is likely to rotate out of high-export, US-concentrated small and mid-cap manufacturers and towards domestically focused businesses, which is the pattern seen on the 31 July 2025 US tariff announcement. Within exporters, capital should favour those with either a US manufacturing footprint (Polyplex) or genuinely domestic value chains, over those reselling Chinese-origin content.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
Component exporters with Chinese sub-assemblies face origin questions.
Capital Goods
Electronics assemblers face the heaviest scrutiny, since that is where Chinese components most often enter.
Chemicals
Exporters using Chinese intermediates face origin audits and slower clearance.
Consumer Durables
Gems and jewellery exports face diamond and gold origin scrutiny.
Services
Testing, certification and trade-compliance providers gain work.
Textiles
Garment and home-textile exporters to the US face documentation load and a harder tariff negotiation.
A pattern seen before
Cascade chain
- US flags Chinese-origin content routed through India
- Indian exporters must document component origin on more shipments
- Working-capital cycles lengthen and US clearance slows
- Chemicals and electronics assemblers with Chinese intermediates take the largest hit
- Demand shifts to exporters with verifiable domestic value chains
- Testing, inspection and trade-compliance providers gain work
Pattern name
China Cascade
Sectors queried
- Textiles
- Chemicals
- Capital Goods
- Consumer Durables
- Automobile and Auto Components
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect high-export small and mid-caps to underperform. On the closest precedent - the 31 July 2025 US announcement of 25% tariffs on India - chemical and textile exporters fell 1% to 9% on the day, though aerospace-linked exporters actually rose.
Medium term
Over one to six months, exporters that can genuinely prove domestic content should recover and gain share from those that cannot. The structural risk is that India's China-plus-one advantage is partly neutralised if US buyers conclude that Indian origin is no longer a safe harbour.
Short term
Over one to four weeks the market will watch whether the India-US trade talks produce a deal that includes anti-transshipment clauses, and how onerous those clauses are. Any concrete US enforcement action against a named Indian exporter would sharply widen the sell-off.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"US trade enforcement tightens origin checks on India exports -\u003e pharma formulations/API exporters using Chinese KSMs/intermediates face documentation burden and possible shipment delays -\u003e firms with backward-integrated or India-sourced API chains gain relative advantage","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["SUNPHARMA","DIVISLAB","LAURUSLABS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"India is a major generic drug supplier to the US, while parts of the API/KSM chain remain China-linked.","sector":"Pharmaceuticals and APIs","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"India named as a transshipment hub -\u003e US scrutiny rises on electronics assembled in India with Chinese subassemblies -\u003e EMS exporters face higher compliance costs, slower clearance, and pressure to localize components","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KAYNES","DIXON","SYRMA"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Separate from broad capital goods; risk is concentrated in assembly-led electronics value chains.","sector":"Electronics Manufacturing Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rules-of-origin checks and anti-transshipment enforcement increase documentation and inspection intensity -\u003e container dwell times and rerouting risk rise -\u003e logistics operators may see volume friction but also demand for compliance-heavy forwarding and warehousing","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","CONCOR","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Near-term operational disruption could be offset by higher demand for traceable logistics services.","sector":"Ports, Shipping and Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US targets Chinese-origin transshipment -\u003e Indian exporters of steel, aluminium, fasteners, pipes and engineered metal products using Chinese inputs face origin challenges -\u003e mills with domestic sourcing benefit from substitution demand","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATASTEEL","JINDALSTEL","APLAPOLLO"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Metal goods are common anti-dumping and circumvention targets globally.","sector":"Metals and Metal Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters face delayed customs clearance and higher documentation demands -\u003e working-capital cycles stretch and receivable risk rises -\u003e banks with export credit exposure may see higher demand but also elevated monitoring risk","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ICICIBANK","SBIN","AXISBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect, via exporter liquidity and LC/documentary trade flows.","sector":"Banks and Trade Finance","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters need auditable origin records, supplier traceability and customs documentation -\u003e demand rises for ERP, supply-chain traceability, analytics and compliance automation -\u003e IT firms serving manufacturing/export clients benefit","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TCS","INFY","LTIM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More likely a services-demand tailwind than a near-term earnings driver.","sector":"IT Services and Compliance Technology","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"US anti-transshipment clauses raise burden of proof on origin -\u003e exporters need third-party certification, material testing, audit trails and supplier verification -\u003e TIC providers see higher demand","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INTERTEK","BUREAUVERITAS","SIS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pure-play NSE exposure is limited; SIS is an imperfect proxy, while many TIC leaders are not NSE-listed.","sector":"Testing, Inspection and Certification","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Origin verification becomes more stringent -\u003e exporters revise labelling, batch tracking, barcoding and packaging documentation -\u003e demand improves for compliant packaging and traceability-linked materials","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["UFLEX","TCPLPACK","HUHTAMAKI"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order beneficiary through compliance adaptation rather than direct trade exposure.","sector":"Packaging and Labelling","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Report lands during India-US tariff talks already strained by Russian oil pressure -\u003e broader trade negotiation risk raises probability of scrutiny or concessions around refined-product flows and crude sourcing -\u003e refiners with export exposure face policy uncertainty","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["RELIANCE","IOC","BPCL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Not a pure transshipment link, but connected through the same India-US trade enforcement channel.","sector":"Oil and Gas Refining","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
13 Aug, 04:28 IST · Market event · high impact
Ocean freight rates to the US and Europe surge three to four times, with Indian exporters now paying over $9,000 per container
Shipping a container from India to America or Europe now costs over $9,000, three to four times what it did, so Indian exporters of clothes, chemicals and machinery lose price competitiveness, while shipping companies that own the vessels earn much more.
Who it hits first
- Exporters of bulky, low-value-density goods - garments, agrochemicals, essential oils, engineering goods - lose price competitiveness because freight is charged per container regardless of contents
- Working capital cycles stretch as voyages lengthen and payment against delivery gets pushed out by weeks
- Perishable and refrigerated exports such as seafood face the sharpest hit, since longer voyages raise both cost and spoilage risk
Who may gain
- Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge directly - Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India own the vessels earning the higher rates
- Air cargo and express logistics gain share as exporters of high-value, time-sensitive goods switch from sea to air
- Freight forwarders and multimodal operators earn more on routing complexity, though their margin depends on passing carrier surcharges through without losing volume
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream buyers are US and European Union retailers, distributors and formulators. They face higher landed costs and respond by reordering from nearer suppliers or demanding a price concession from the Indian supplier. Ports and container terminals see mixed effects - longer dwell times and transshipment work rise, but underlying export volumes fall.
Upstream
Indian exporters' upstream suppliers - cotton ginners and spinners feeding garment makers, basic chemical producers feeding formulators - lose order volume with a one-to-two-month lag as export orders slow. Container availability at Indian ports is the binding constraint: empty boxes are stranded on longer rotations, so even exporters willing to pay struggle to book space.
Where demand moves
Business
Overseas demand for Indian goods does not disappear - it relocates. Under free-on-board terms the buyer pays the freight, so the buyer sees a higher landed cost for Indian cargo and reorders from suppliers closer to home: Mexico and Eastern Europe for the US and European Union markets, Vietnam and Bangladesh for garments. Indian exporters keep the order only by conceding on price, which is the real margin hit. In the opposite direction, demand flows to whoever owns vessel capacity - carriers and ship owners - and to air cargo for high-value goods that can absorb the airfreight premium.
Capital
Money rotates out of export-dependent manufacturers - textiles, agrochemicals, engineering goods, seafood - and into the asset owners who capture the surcharge: Great Eastern Shipping and Shipping Corporation of India. Some also rotates into domestic-demand businesses that have no export exposure at all, since this is a purely trade-side shock.
How it spreads across sectors
Chemicals
Agrochemical and pigment exporters face freight that is a large share of delivered price on high-volume cargo
Pharma
Least affected of the exporters - formulations are high value per container, so freight is a small share of the invoice
Services
Ship owners and liner operators capture the surcharge; freight forwarders gain routing work
Textiles
Garment exports lose landed-cost competitiveness against Vietnam and Bangladesh just as US tariff pressure had begun to ease
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
fuel
Note
Freight itself is not a tracked Commodity node. What is tracked, and what matters here, is bunker fuel: ship owners capture the freight surcharge but pay 11.41 percent more for fuel than a month ago, so the fuel edge is the cost offset against the revenue gain. Only Great Eastern Shipping carries a recorded fuel cost weight (13.39 percent); Shipping Corporation of India has the edge with no weight.
Shock type
cost_offset
Unit
USD/gallon
When it plays out
Immediate
Shipping stocks lead - the December 2023 Red Sea precedent had Great Eastern Shipping up 6.41% in a day. Exporters drift lower as buyers begin renegotiating.
Medium term
The January 2024 precedent shows the shipping trade has the longer legs - Shipping Corporation of India was up 31.01% a month later while Gokaldas Exports was down 2.67%. Rates normalise only when the chokepoint disruptions ease, which is tied to the Hormuz situation.
Short term
Watch export order books and the container availability position at Nhava Sheva and Mundra. Exporters will flag freight in their next quarterly commentary; the government may be pressed for a freight subsidy or interest-equalisation extension.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"High container freight to US/EU raises landed cost for exported components, reducing buyer margins and order competitiveness versus Mexico/Eastern Europe suppliers; working-capital cycle can stretch if shipments are delayed by rerouting.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["MOTHERSON","BHARATFORG","SONACOMS"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for export-oriented component makers with meaningful Europe/US exposure.","sector":"Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Although high-value shipments can use air freight, bulkier jewellery exports and importer replenishment still face logistics cost inflation and delivery uncertainty; weak buyer resistance can compress exporter margins.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["TITAN","KALYANKJIL","SENCO"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is smaller than low-value bulky goods because value density is high, but export demand and delivery reliability can still be hit.","sector":"Gems and Jewellery","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Longer voyages and higher refrigerated container costs raise delivered prices for shrimp and seafood exports to US/EU; cold-chain delays increase spoilage and rejection risk.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["AVANTIFEED","APEX","WATERBASE"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Shrimp exporters are sensitive to both freight rates and transit-time reliability.","sector":"Seafood and Aquaculture Exports","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight spike raises landed costs for rice, spices, tea, coffee and processed foods; lower-value or bulky exports lose competitiveness fastest, especially where contracts are price-sensitive.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["KRBL","LTFOODS","TATACONSUM"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on product value density and ability to pass through freight surcharges.","sector":"Agricultural and Processed Food Exports","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exported machinery, forgings, castings and industrial products face higher container costs and delayed delivery windows, hurting competitiveness and execution timelines for overseas orders.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CGPOWER","SKFINDIA","ELECON"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Order-book execution may be affected more than immediate demand if delays persist.","sector":"Engineering Goods and Industrial Machinery","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Freight volatility increases demand for forwarding, route planning, warehousing and multimodal alternatives; however, margin benefit depends on ability to pass carrier surcharges without volume loss.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TCIEXP","MAHLOG","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Asset-light forwarders may gain on spreads and volumes, while exporters cutting shipments can cap upside.","sector":"Freight Forwarders and Multimodal Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"Rerouting and schedule disruptions can increase dwell time, transshipment complexity and demand for container handling/storage; but weaker export volumes can offset handling gains.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ADANIPORTS","JSWINFRA","GPPL"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Beneficiaries mainly if congestion/storage revenues rise without a sharp fall in throughput.","sector":"Ports and Container Infrastructure","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Exporters of high-value or time-sensitive goods may shift from sea to air to protect delivery commitments, supporting air cargo and express logistics demand.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["INDIGO","BLUEDART","DELHIVERY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Only viable for high-value, low-weight products; not a broad substitute for container freight.","sector":"Air Cargo and Express Logistics","time_horizon":"immediate"}
- {"causal_chain":"US/EU-bound leather goods and footwear are price-sensitive exports; freight inflation raises landed costs and can shift incremental orders toward closer or cheaper competing suppliers.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["BATAINDIA","RELAXO","MIRZAINT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Listed pure-play export exposure is limited, but the sector-level causal link is defensible.","sector":"Footwear and Leather Goods","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 20 Jun 2023 | unspecified | ₹1.4 |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jun 2022 | unspecified | ₹1.4 |
| 15 Sep 2021 | unspecified | ₹1.4 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 8 rows from NSE's archive (replace 2, delete 1, insert 5), 2023-11-12..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 12 Nov 2023
Bulk & block deals
| Date | Who | Bought / sold | Shares | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 May 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | BUY | 16,89,971 | ₹57.70 |
| 5 May 2026 | NK SECURITIES RESEARCH PRIVATE LIMITED | SELL | 16,89,971 | ₹57.75 |
| 5 May 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | BUY | 13,77,824 | ₹57.81 |
| 5 May 2026 | QE SECURITIES LLP | SELL | 13,76,049 | ₹57.82 |
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Annual report · 2025-2614 Aug 2026
- Earnings call6 Aug 2026
- Earnings call · Q1FY2730 Jul 2026
- Results presentation30 Jun 2026
- Earnings call · Q4FY2616 May 2026
- Earnings call · Q3FY262 Feb 2026
- Earnings call · Q2FY2612 Nov 2025
- Annual report · 2024-255 Jun 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.