NMDC Limited
NSE: NMDCIndustrial Minerals
Share price
₹70.69
-2.90% close of 8 Oct 2026
Business score
How strong the business is, in one number. The parts behind it are in Pro.
68
out of 100 · worked out 8 Oct 2026
Your ratios
The numbers you want to see first. Tap Edit to change them.
Market cap
₹62,137 Cr
P/E ratio
8.3
P/B ratio
1.8
ROCE
27.6%
ROE
23.4%
Dividend yield
4.9%
Price & valuation chart
How the share price and its valuation have moved. Hover over the chart to see any day. Prices as of the last close.
Answers
Simple answers to the questions investors ask most, from the company's own numbers.
How fast it has been growing
Sales grew 27.3% over the past year, and 13.7% a year over its longer record. Meanwhile what it keeps of every 100 rupees of sales slipped from 42.6% to 29.8% over the last four years.
Whether it grew faster than its sector
It grew 13.7% a year against a sector median of 10.6% — 3.1 percentage points faster.
Room to re-rate, or risk of de-rating
At 8.3× earnings against a market that pays 23.9× across 2199 companies we can price. Its own industry sits at 21.1×, across 5 companies. It is against its own five-year median of 9.3×, the 39th percentile of its own range.
Whether growth justifies the valuation
Priced at 0.5 times its growth rate, on earnings growth of 17%.
| Profit growth | Price per ₹1 profit | Per 1% growth | |
|---|---|---|---|
| NMDC Limited — this one | 17%/yr | 8.3× | ₹0.49 |
| Lloyds Metals And Energy Limited | 60%/yr | 21.1× | ₹0.35 |
| Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited | -38%/yr | 26.0× | — |
| Gravita India Limited | 19%/yr | 28.4× | ₹1.5 |
| MOIL Limited | 3%/yr | 15.3× | ₹5.1 |
| Ashapura Minechem Limited | 51%/yr | 10.8× | ₹0.21 |
Compared with companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
How it compares with its peers
Against companies the exchange files under the same label (Industrial Minerals), it ranks 1 of 10 on returns, 3 of 8 on growth, 2 of 10 on margin. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
What makes it hard to beat — and is that still true?
A wide advantage: it earns 27.6% on capital, ahead of 90% of companies filed under the same label. That grouping comes from the exchange's filing category, so some of them may not be real rivals.
Whether its growth pays for itself
Yes — Over the last five years it made ₹23064 crore of cash from the business, spent ₹10694 crore on plant and equipment, and returned ₹10753 crore to lenders and shareholders. And the profit is real: of every 100 rupees it reported over 12 years, about 75 arrived as cash. Its cash comes back more slowly than it used to: it went from being waiting 30 days for its cash to waiting 67 days for its cash.
Profit reality check
Is the profit real cash? Simple checks on the accounts. Facts only, not advice.
8 of 9 checks clear · 89%
Latest result · Q1 FY27
What the last results showed. Whether management kept its word is in Pro.
Revenue and profit were both flat against last year, at ₹6,795 crore and ₹1,976 crore.
Announced 15 Aug 2026 · Consolidated · Unaudited
Revenue
₹6,795 Cr
Revenue vs last year
+0.8%
Revenue vs last quarter
-40.1%
Net profit
₹1,976 Cr
Profit vs last year
+0.4%
Profit vs last quarter
-2.5%
Net margin
29.1%
EPS
₹2.25
Checklist before you investPRO
Points for and against, in one list.
Key numbers & peers
The main numbers grouped by topic, and how the company compares with similar ones.
Price
- Market cap
- ₹62,137 Cr
- Prev close
- ₹70.69
- 52w High
- ₹97.5
- 52w Low
- ₹70.1
- Enterprise value
- ₹57,149 Cr
- Beta
- 1.2
- Price CAGR 1y
- -5.0%
- Price CAGR 3y
- 15.0%
- Price CAGR 5y
- 14.0%
- Price CAGR 10y
- 9.0%
Ratios
- Return on assets
- 15.4%
- PEG ratio
- 0.5
- P/E ratio
- 8.3
- P/B ratio
- 1.8
- EV / EBITDA
- 6.2
- Industry P/E
- 15.4
- ROCE
- 27.6%
- ROCE 5y average
- 33.6%
- ROE
- 23.4%
- Debt / Equity
- 0.2
- Interest coverage
- 84.9
- Dividend yield
- 4.9%
- ROE 3y average
- 24.0%
- ROE last year
- 23.0%
Annual P&L
- Annual revenue
- ₹32,071 Cr
- Annual profit
- ₹7,450 Cr
- Operating margin
- 29.0%
- Net profit margin
- 23.2%
- EBITDA margin
- 28.9%
- Sales growth 3y
- 22.0%
- Sales growth 5y
- 15.8%
- Profit growth 3y
- 17.0%
- Profit growth 5y
- 4.0%
- EPS
- ₹8.5
- Sales growth TTM
- 27.0%
- Profit growth TTM
- 14.0%
- Dividend payout
- 41.0%
Quarter P&L
- Sales latest quarter
- ₹6,795 Cr
- Profit latest quarter
- ₹1,976 Cr
- YoY quarterly sales growth
- 0.8%
- YoY quarterly profit growth
- 0.4%
- OPM latest quarter
- 36.3%
Balance Sheet
- Book Value
- ₹38.8
- Face Value
- ₹1.0
- Total debt
- ₹6,407 Cr
- Total cash
- ₹11,387 Cr
- Borrowings
- ₹6,407 Cr
- Reserves / Equity
- 37.8
Cash Flow
- Operating cash flow
- ₹4,996 Cr
- Free cash flow
- ₹1,826 Cr
- FCF yield
- 2.7%
- Net cash flow
- ₹63 Cr
Shareholding
- Promoter holding
- 60.8%
- FII holding
- 13.6%
- DII holding
- 13.8%
- Public holding
- 11.8%
Peer comparison
| Company | Price ₹ | P/E | Mkt cap ₹ Cr | Div yield % | Profit qtr ₹ Cr | Profit var % | Sales qtr ₹ Cr | Sales var % | ROCE % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyds Metals | 1,812.70 | 21.4 | 1,02,064 | 0.05 | 1,733.9 | 169.1 | 7,354.4 | 208.6 | 27.3 |
| NMDC | 71.70 | 8.4 | 63,037 | 4.86 | 1,976.2 | 0.4 | 6,795.3 | 0.8 | 27.6 |
| G M D C | 473.00 | 26.4 | 15,041 | 2.00 | 163.4 | -0.2 | 906.6 | 23.8 | 10.8 |
| Gravita India | 1,495.50 | 28.2 | 11,038 | 0.42 | 106.4 | 14.1 | 1,475.1 | 41.8 | 16.2 |
| MOIL | 234.05 | 15.7 | 4,763 | 2.24 | 87.6 | 70.1 | 370.9 | 6.6 | 12.4 |
| Ashapura Minech. | 474.00 | 11.0 | 4,528 | 0.41 | 108.3 | 5.0 | 1,616.1 | 19.2 | 20.7 |
| Orissa Minerals | 3,505.00 | 633.4 | 2,103 | 0.00 | 3.5 | 223.7 | 28.7 | 47.9 | 9.6 |
| Median | 442.50 | 15.7 | 3,315 | 0.41 | 55.1 | 15.7 | 343.6 | 21.5 | 15.2 |
Competes with: 20 Microns Limited, Adani Enterprises, Ashapura Minechem Limited, Goa Carbon Limited, Gravita India Limited, Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Lloyds Metals And Energy Limited, MOIL Limited, Nile Limited, The Orissa Minerals Development Company Limited
Quarterly results
Sales and profit for each of the last 13 quarters. Newest on the right. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Jun 2023 | Sep 2023 | Dec 2023 | Mar 2024 | Jun 2024 | Sep 2024 | Dec 2024 | Mar 2025 | Jun 2025 | Sep 2025 | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 | Jun 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 5,395 | 4,014 | 5,410 | 6,489 | 5,414 | 4,919 | 6,568 | 7,005 | 6,739 | 6,378 | 7,611 | 11,343 | 6,795 |
| Expenses | 3,401 | 2,824 | 3,403 | 4,388 | 3,074 | 3,533 | 4,196 | 4,953 | 4,260 | 4,385 | 5,467 | 8,700 | 4,327 |
| Material Cost | 4.14 | 216 | 0.07 | 668 | 464 | ||||||||
| Change in Inventories | -32 | 107 | -53 | 213 | -1,094 | ||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 92 | 431 | 582 | 2,837 | 0 | ||||||||
| Employee Cost | 412 | 403 | 445 | 680 | 488 | ||||||||
| Other Expenses | 3,784 | 3,228 | 4,492 | 4,301 | 4,469 | ||||||||
| Operating Profit | 1,994 | 1,190 | 2,007 | 2,102 | 2,340 | 1,386 | 2,372 | 2,051 | 2,478 | 1,993 | 2,144 | 2,644 | 2,468 |
| OPM % | 37 | 30 | 37 | 32 | 43 | 28 | 36 | 29 | 37 | 31 | 28 | 23 | 36 |
| Other Income | 294 | 321 | 84 | 389 | 365 | 361 | 375 | 492 | 300 | 383 | 372 | 432 | 347 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
| Interest | 6 | 19 | 32 | 21 | 23 | 29 | 61 | 65 | 27 | 8 | 35 | 51 | 22 |
| Depreciation | 69 | 89 | 82 | 111 | 74 | 103 | 103 | 141 | 109 | 110 | 107 | 152 | 103 |
| Profit before tax | 2,212 | 1,404 | 1,977 | 2,359 | 2,608 | 1,614 | 2,584 | 2,338 | 2,643 | 2,259 | 2,375 | 2,873 | 2,691 |
| Tax % | 25 | 27 | 26 | 40 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 37 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 30 | 25 |
| Net Profit | 1,653 | 1,026 | 1,482 | 1,410 | 1,969 | 1,205 | 1,880 | 1,477 | 1,968 | 1,698 | 1,757 | 2,027 | 1,976 |
| EPS in Rs | 1.88 | 1.17 | 1.69 | 1.61 | 2.24 | 1.38 | 2.14 | 1.68 | 2.24 | 1.93 | 2 | 2.31 | 2.25 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 2.24 | 1.93 | 2 | 2.31 | 2.25 |
Profit & loss
Yearly sales, costs and profit for 12 years, plus the last 12 months (TTM). ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 | TTM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales | 12,356 | 6,456 | 8,828 | 11,615 | 12,153 | 11,699 | 15,370 | 25,965 | 17,667 | 21,308 | 23,906 | 32,071 | 32,127 |
| Expenses | 4,591 | 3,771 | 5,233 | 5,812 | 5,228 | 5,697 | 6,580 | 13,338 | 11,613 | 14,014 | 15,755 | 22,811 | 22,878 |
| Material Cost | 2,172 | ||||||||||||
| Change in Inventories | 236 | ||||||||||||
| Purchases of Stock-in-Trade | 3,942 | ||||||||||||
| Employee Cost | 1,940 | ||||||||||||
| Other Expenses | 14,521 | ||||||||||||
| Operating Profit | 7,765 | 2,685 | 3,595 | 5,803 | 6,925 | 6,003 | 8,790 | 12,626 | 6,054 | 7,294 | 8,150 | 9,260 | 9,249 |
| OPM % | 63 | 42 | 41 | 50 | 57 | 51 | 57 | 49 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 29 | 29 |
| Other Income | 2,155 | 1,682 | 910 | 667 | 588 | 416 | 351 | 716 | 2,004 | 1,087 | 1,591 | 1,488 | 1,535 |
| Exceptional items (within Other Income) | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Interest | 0 | 66 | 21 | 37 | 40 | 10 | 17 | 39 | 75 | 78 | 178 | 121 | 116 |
| Depreciation | 173 | 218 | 197 | 257 | 279 | 295 | 229 | 288 | 336 | 351 | 420 | 477 | 472 |
| Profit before tax | 9,747 | 4,084 | 4,287 | 6,176 | 7,194 | 6,114 | 8,896 | 13,016 | 7,646 | 7,953 | 9,144 | 10,149 | 10,197 |
| Tax % | 34 | 34 | 40 | 38 | 36 | 41 | 30 | 27 | 28 | 30 | 28 | 27 | |
| Net Profit | 6,351 | 2,544 | 2,543 | 3,808 | 4,617 | 3,573 | 6,276 | 9,429 | 5,601 | 5,571 | 6,539 | 7,450 | 7,459 |
| EPS in Rs | 5.34 | 2.14 | 2.68 | 4.01 | 5.03 | 3.89 | 7.14 | 11 | 6.37 | 6.34 | 7.43 | 8.47 | 8.49 |
| Diluted EPS in Rs | 8.47 | ||||||||||||
| Dividend Payout % | 53 | 171 | 64 | 36 | 37 | 45 | 36 | 46 | 35 | 38 | 44 | 41 |
Compounded growth
Average yearly growth over different spans, as stored. A span can cross a demerger or an acquisition.
Compounded sales growth
- 10 years
- 17%
- 5 years
- 16%
- 3 years
- 22%
- TTM
- 27%
Compounded profit growth
- 10 years
- 11%
- 5 years
- 4%
- 3 years
- 17%
- TTM
- 14%
Stock price CAGR
- 10 years
- 9%
- 5 years
- 14%
- 3 years
- 15%
- 1 year
- -5%
Return on equity
- 10 years
- 21%
- 5 years
- 26%
- 3 years
- 24%
- Last year
- 23%
Balance sheet
What the company owns and what it owes, at the end of each year. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity Capital | 396 | 396 | 316 | 316 | 306 | 306 | 293 | 293 | 293 | 293 | 879 | 879 |
| Reserves | 31,870 | 28,784 | 22,266 | 24,101 | 25,738 | 27,367 | 29,591 | 17,725 | 22,328 | 25,363 | 28,817 | 33,183 |
| Borrowings | 0 | 1,497 | 0 | 500 | 364 | 566 | 1,994 | 1,800 | 2,128 | 3,359 | 4,276 | 6,407 |
| Other Liabilities | 2,197 | 2,079 | 3,201 | 3,774 | 3,483 | 3,056 | 5,051 | 5,094 | 5,204 | 6,646 | 7,035 | 7,851 |
| Minority Interest | 14 | |||||||||||
| Total Liabilities | 34,464 | 32,756 | 25,784 | 28,691 | 29,891 | 31,294 | 36,930 | 24,912 | 29,953 | 35,661 | 41,007 | 48,320 |
| Fixed Assets | 1,468 | 2,058 | 2,095 | 3,457 | 3,512 | 3,810 | 3,933 | 3,662 | 3,199 | 3,377 | 5,038 | 5,856 |
| CWIP | 7,801 | 9,747 | 11,855 | 12,545 | 13,819 | 15,530 | 17,158 | 1,333 | 1,998 | 3,235 | 4,737 | 6,749 |
| Investments | 319 | 592 | 612 | 673 | 859 | 910 | 875 | 895 | 940 | 956 | 978 | 1,372 |
| Other Assets | 24,876 | 20,359 | 11,221 | 12,016 | 11,701 | 11,045 | 14,964 | 19,022 | 23,816 | 28,094 | 30,253 | 34,344 |
| Total Assets | 34,464 | 32,756 | 25,784 | 28,691 | 29,891 | 31,294 | 36,930 | 24,912 | 29,953 | 35,661 | 41,007 | 48,320 |
Cash flows
Real money coming in and going out each year — from the business, from investments and from loans. ₹ crore.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operating Activity | 3,999 | 2,502 | 2,109 | 3,376 | 4,002 | 2,126 | 7,266 | 6,942 | 1,838 | 7,394 | 1,894 | 4,996 |
| Cash from Investing Activity | -517 | 3,645 | 5,171 | -1,865 | -789 | -313 | -4,316 | -3,214 | 202 | -6,076 | 306 | -3,842 |
| Cash from Financing Activity | -3,449 | -6,290 | -7,249 | -1,557 | -3,201 | -1,753 | -2,591 | -4,067 | -2,067 | -1,302 | -2,225 | -1,092 |
| Net Cash Flow | 33 | -144 | 31 | -46 | 11 | 60 | 359 | -339 | -28 | 16 | -25 | 63 |
| Free Cash Flow | 1,185 | -1,073 | -211 | 1,318 | 1,996 | -278 | 5,644 | 5,743 | 590 | 5,547 | -1,336 | 1,826 |
Ratios
How fast customers pay, how long stock sits, and how well capital earns — year by year.
| Line item | Mar 2015 | Mar 2016 | Mar 2017 | Mar 2018 | Mar 2019 | Mar 2020 | Mar 2021 | Mar 2022 | Mar 2023 | Mar 2024 | Mar 2025 | Mar 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debtor Days | 52 | 45 | 43 | 46 | 43 | 69 | 51 | 42 | 90 | 60 | 118 | 105 |
| Inventory Days | 170 | |||||||||||
| Days Payable | 27 | |||||||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle | 52 | 45 | 43 | 46 | 43 | 69 | 51 | 42 | 90 | 60 | 118 | 247 |
| Working Capital Days | 101 | 7 | 3 | -4 | 9 | 53 | -19 | 30 | 94 | 9 | 55 | 67 |
| ROCE % | 32 | 14 | 16 | 25 | 28 | 23 | 30 | 50 | 29 | 31 | 30 | 28 |
Price trend
The price as a Renko brick chart: small moves drop out so the bigger path stands out.
Every brick is the same size, about one typical day's move. A new brick needs a full brick's move; turning the other way needs two. Bricks show where the price went, not where it will go.
Open interestPRO
Where option traders are positioned on this stock.
Industry numbers
The numbers that matter most in this industry, from the company's own filings.
1 when an audit qualification is filed as repetitive
0.00flag
2026-03-31
the company's own unlisted debt securities in default at period end
0.00cr
2026-06-30
the company's own loans / revolving facilities in default at period end (standalone filing)
0.00cr
2026-06-30
net debt from the filed balance sheet at the newest year end: Borrowings − Cash Equivalents − Investments (Current); negative = net cash
-4,987inr_cr
2026-03-31
guarantees / comfort given for promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
loans outstanding to promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP (governance filing)
0.00cr
2026-03-31
security given for the borrowing of promoter, promoter group, directors and KMP
0.00cr
2026-03-31
FY revenue / permanent employees + workers, same basis (calc)
5,50,67,539inr
2026-03-31
News
News and filings about NMDC Limited. Open one to see why it matters.
No recent news for this company.
Supply chain
Who it buys from, sells to and competes with — as recorded in our map of company links.
Competes with
Depends on the price of
- Iron Ore
Buys from
- BEML Limited · Mining/earthmoving equipment (iron ore mining)
- Central Mine Planning & Design Institute Limited · coal/mineral exploration, mine planning & design, and allied engineering consultancy servi…
- Mstc Limited · e-auction services for iron ore, diamonds & minerals
- Orissa Bengal Carrier Limited · road transportation / bulk FTL, LTL, parcel and 3PL logistics services
- Rail Vikas Nigam Limited · infrastructure/civil construction (buffer stockpile facilities, EPC)
- Revathi Equipment India Limited · drilling rigs/equipment and related spares/services for iron-ore mining operations
- SEPC Limited · by-product complex + ETP EPC, Nagarnar 3.0 MTPA steel plant
- Sab Events & Governance Now Media Limited · event sponsorship, conference partnership and digital media advertising
- South West Pinnacle Exploration Limited · Mineral exploration and drilling services
- Suraj Limited · stainless steel seamless pipes, tubes and fittings (named as 'National Mineral Development…
- TRF Limited · Bulk material handling and mining equipment, systems and services
- Tega Industries Limited · Iron-ore beneficiation, screening and wet-processing plant + wear consumables (Donimalai 7…
Sells to
- JINDAL STEEL LIMITED · iron ore
- JSW Steel · iron ore
- Jindal Stainless Limited · iron ore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited · iron ore
- Steel Authority of India · iron ore
- Tata Steel · iron ore
About
What the company is, from our own records: where it sits, where it makes things, and what it is made of.
- Sector
- Metals & Mining
- Industry
- Industrial Minerals
- Classification
- Metals & Mining › Industrial Minerals
- ISIN
- INE584A01023
Business segments
- Iron Ore · 77%
- HR Coil & Sheets · 12%
- Pellet ,Other Minerals, Products, Services & Others · 11%
Plants
- Bailadila Iron Ore Mine (Bacheli Complex)
- Bailadila Iron Ore Mine (Kirandul Complex)
- Donimalai Iron Ore Mine · Donimalai, Karnataka
- Kumaraswamy Iron Ore Mine · Kumaraswamy, Karnataka
- Panna Diamond Mine · Panna, Madhya Pradesh
News impact
Big market events that reach NMDC Limited, and how the effect spreads.
28 Sept, 15:59 IST · Market event · high impact
NMDC commissions ₹5,427 crore iron ore processing complex in Chhattisgarh; stock slides 2%
NMDC opened a Rs 5,427-crore iron ore plant in Chhattisgarh, so it can sell more ore over time, helping NMDC and steelmakers, while rival ore miners face tougher competition.
Who it hits first
- NMDC Limited, India's big iron ore miner, has opened a Rs 5,427 crore complex in Chhattisgarh with a new ore plant at Bacheli, a 135-km pipeline carrying 15 MTPA of ore mixed with water (slurry), and a 2 MTPA unit at Nagarnar turning ore dust into small balls (pellets) for steel furnaces.
- With its own washing, transport and pellet units running, NMDC can sell more finished ore over the next few quarters at a lower cost per tonne.
- Even so, NMDC stock fell about 2% that day, which suggests traders had already expected the opening or are cautious on ore prices and project spending.
Who may gain
- NMDC Limited itself, the iron ore miner, gains higher sale volumes and lower transport bills from its own pipeline and pellet unit.
- Steel makers that buy NMDC ore - Tata Steel, Steel Authority of India with its 7 MTPA Bhilai plant in Chhattisgarh, JSW Steel, Jindal Steel with its Raigarh plant in Chhattisgarh, and Jindal Stainless - get steadier local ore and pellets, which can trim input costs.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Downstream, steel makers Tata Steel, SAIL, JSW Steel, Jindal Steel and Jindal Stainless receive the benefit, as local Bacheli ore, pipeline transport and Nagarnar pellets improve availability and can lower their input bills.
Upstream
Upstream, firms that supplied NMDC - rail builder RVNL, equipment makers BEML and Tega Industries, planner CMPDI and service firms MSTC, SEPC and SouthWest - did their work during construction; with the plant commissioned, this event brings them no new orders.
Where demand moves
Business
Business demand flows from NMDC outward as saleable ore and pellets: NMDC can now offer more washed ore and Nagarnar pellets to its steel customers, while equipment and construction suppliers see no fresh orders because the build phase is over.
Capital
Investor money is likely to favour NMDC for rising volumes and its steel customers for steadier costs, while trimming smaller rival miners on fears of extra supply, though the 2% slide in NMDC shows near-term caution on spending and ore prices.
How it spreads across sectors
Metals & Mining
Leader NMDC adds low-cost supply, which supports sector output but squeezes smaller rival miners on price and share.
Steel
Steel makers gain cheaper local ore and pellets from Chhattisgarh, aiding margins if steel prices hold.
When it plays out
Immediate
1-7 days: NMDC trades flat to soft after the 2% slide as traders weigh priced-in opening vs volume promise; steel buyers react mildly.
Medium term
1-6 months: Higher NMDC volumes and pipeline savings show in sales, while rival miners feel any price pressure and steel makers bank cost relief.
Short term
1-4 weeks: Watch NMDC dispatches, pellet sales and any ore price moves; steel makers comment on input costs in updates.
23 Sept, 06:58 IST · Market event · medium impact
Adani Group settles legal issues with Sebi, pays Rs 1.5 cr over corporate governance violations
Adani companies paid 1.5 crore rupees to India's market regulator to settle complaints about company rules, helping Adani investors as legal worries fade, hurting no one directly.
Who it hits first
- Adani Enterprises, the Adani Group's main company that starts new businesses and mines, and Adani Green Energy, its clean-power producer, jointly paid Rs 1.5 crore to SEBI to close cases about related-party deal disclosures and company governance.
- Adani Enterprises paid Rs 76.05 lakh of that total, ending a governance overhang tied to questions raised in the Hindenburg Report.
- The cash cost is tiny for companies of this size, so the real effect is reputational: fewer legal headlines and slightly easier talks with lenders and investors.
Who may gain
- Adani Green Energy, the clean-power producer running solar and wind farms, as a named settler seeing governance worries fade.
- Adani Enterprises, the Adani Group's main company that starts new businesses and mines, as the other named settler.
- Adani Power, the group's electricity generator, via group-sentiment spillover rather than new business.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
No downstream change — Adani Power, the group's power generator that buys from Adani Enterprises, burns the same fuel and sells the same electricity; only group sentiment, not volumes, shifts.
Upstream
No upstream change — solar-module makers, project builders, and steel and cable suppliers to Adani Enterprises and Adani Green see no new orders from a paperwork settlement.
Where demand moves
Business
No new business demand — nobody orders more power, coal, or solar panels because of a governance settlement; electricity sales, mining volumes, and module orders are unchanged.
Capital
Small positive capital flow for Adani shares as the SEBI closure trims legal risk; lenders and foreign investors face one less governance headline, but the Rs 1.5 crore sum itself moves no valuation.
How it spreads across sectors
Infrastructure
Neutral — no new roads, ports, or construction orders flow from a Rs 1.5 crore governance payment.
Power
Neutral for other power makers like NTPC and Tata Power — tariffs, demand, and project pipelines are unchanged by Adani's paperwork settlement.
When it plays out
Immediate
1-7 days: mild relief bounce in Adani Enterprises and Adani Green shares as headlines note the SEBI closure; peers stay flat.
Medium term
1-6 months: no lasting earnings impact from a Rs 1.5 crore payment; governance record matters only if no fresh SEBI queries appear.
Short term
1-4 weeks: sentiment fades as investors refocus on earnings, debt, and power tariffs; no order or tariff change follows.
27 Aug, 04:35 IST · Market event · medium impact
Supreme Court issues notice to Tata Steel as Odisha revives a Rs 4,313 crore mineral-dispatch shortfall demand that the Orissa High Court had quashed in April 2026
Odisha wants Tata Steel to pay about Rs 4,313 crore for digging out less ore than its mining agreement required. A High Court threw the demand out in April; the state has appealed and the Supreme Court has now asked Tata Steel to respond, so an old risk is back on the table.
Who it hits first
- Tata Steel faces a revived Rs 4,313.63 crore demand from Odisha - Rs 1,902.73 crore for the fourth year and Rs 2,410.90 crore for the fifth year of its Mine Development and Production Agreement, both for dispatching less mineral than the plan required. The Orissa High Court quashed both notices on 20 April 2026; the Supreme Court issuing notice means the state's appeal will be heard.
- Nothing changes operationally. No mine is stopped, no production is curtailed and no payment is due while the High Court order stands.
Who may gain
- JSW Steel is the relative winner because it does not hold the Odisha leases at issue and would face no equivalent claim if Tata Steel's landed ore cost rises.
- The benefit is thin. In all three past episodes we measured, peer steel stocks moved on their own drivers rather than on Tata Steel's Odisha news.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Tata Steel's automotive and construction customers recorded in our graph - Maruti Suzuki, Tata Motors, Mahindra & Mahindra, Ashok Leyland, Hero MotoCorp, TVS Motor and Larsen & Toubro - face no supply or price change. A Rs 4,313 crore penalty, if ever paid, is a one-time cash item and would not be passed into steel prices in a market where iron ore is already down 12.51% over three months.
Upstream
Tata Steel's mining contractors, explosives and equipment suppliers in Odisha see no change while the High Court order holds. Its recorded suppliers such as Elecon Engineering for material handling and ABB for mine automation face no order impact. If shortfall penalties are eventually upheld, mining service contractors gain because lease holders would raise dispatch volumes to stay above the plan.
Where demand moves
Business
There is no change to steel supply or demand from this - the mines keep running and Tata Steel's customers see no disruption. The only genuine business flow is the possibility that, if shortfall penalties are upheld, Odisha lease holders raise dispatch volumes to avoid future penalties, which would add iron ore supply and soften prices. That would help steelmakers who buy ore, such as JSW Steel, and hurt merchant miners such as NMDC.
Capital
Money rotates from Tata Steel toward peers without Odisha shortfall exposure during the news window, mainly JSW Steel. Because the sums involved are small relative to these companies and the legal position still favours Tata Steel, the rotation is shallow - the 2017 Supreme Court Odisha judgment saw Tata Steel rise 14.55% over the following month while Jindal Steel fell 11.43%, so the flow went to the strongest balance sheet rather than away from the accused.
How it spreads across sectors
Automobile and Auto Components
No steel supply or price effect - carmakers are unaffected
Construction
No steel supply effect; project steel costs unchanged
Metals & Mining
Reopens the question of penalties for producing below an approved mining plan, which touches every Odisha lease holder
codex additions
Commodity angle
Commodity
Iron Ore
Note
Iron ore is included as background because the dispute is about iron and chrome ore dispatch volumes, not because this event moves the iron ore price. The rank-affectedness ranker could not resolve a directional move for Iron Ore - its five-day move of 0.13% was inside the +/-2% deadband - so it kept each DEPENDS_ON_COMMODITY edge role unchanged and its propagated directions for this event are sector-driver signs, not commodity-derived ones. No margin impact is attributed to any company from the ore price here, so every impacted_companies entry carries a cost weight of 0 and 0 basis points.
Shock type
context_only
When it plays out
Immediate
A shallow one to three percent drag on Tata Steel, with Jindal Steel & Power the peer most likely to move in sympathy on precedent risk.
Medium term
A full hearing is likely a year or more away. The genuine risk is a broad ruling on Rule 12-A shortfall penalties that reaches every Odisha lease holder, which would be a sector event rather than a Tata Steel event.
Short term
Watch whether the Supreme Court grants any interim stay of the High Court order. Absent a stay, nothing is payable and the news decays quickly.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Large mining penalty risk can weaken borrower cash flows, raise contingent-liability scrutiny for metal/mining exposures, and affect working-capital appetite for steel and mining clients.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","AXISBANK"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is likely contained unless litigation risk broadens across Odisha lease holders or rating agencies flag leverage/covenant concerns.","sector":"Banks and NBFCs","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If regulatory pressure or cash conservation curbs mining/steel capex, demand for industrial construction materials can soften; conversely unchanged steel supply limits near-term input-cost shock for cement users.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","AMBUJACEM"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More relevant through mining-region capex and infrastructure sentiment than direct commodity pass-through.","sector":"Cement","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mining penalty uncertainty may delay mine expansion, beneficiation, material-handling, and steel-plant capex orders from affected operators.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["LT","BHEL","THERMAX"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Order timing risk is higher if the notice becomes a precedent for other Odisha miners.","sector":"Capital Goods and Industrial Equipment","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Stricter enforcement of approved mining plans can raise compliance burden, alter production schedules, and delay excavation or mine-development contracts in iron ore and chrome belts.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["GMRP\u0026UI","LT","ASHOKLEY"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Pure-play listed exposure is limited; equipment and mine-infra proxies are more practical.","sector":"Mining Services and Contracting","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Any production curbs, delayed dispatches, or cautious mine operations in Odisha iron ore/chrome leases would affect bulk mineral movement by rail, road, and ports.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","VRLLOG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"No immediate supply disruption is indicated, so this is a second-order volume-sensitivity risk.","sector":"Logistics and Rail-linked Freight","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel and ferrochrome operations are power-intensive; cash outflows or operational caution at mining-linked steel producers can marginally affect industrial power demand and captive/open-access offtake.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["NTPC","TATAPOWER","JSWENERGY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Magnitude stays small unless litigation affects production or broader metals capex.","sector":"Power Utilities and Coal-linked Energy","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel and ferrochrome producers consume refractories, electrodes, fluxes, and process chemicals; weaker steel capex or constrained operations can soften demand for these industrial inputs.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["RHIM","GRAPHITE","HEG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More exposed to production/capex trajectory than the legal notice itself.","sector":"Specialty Chemicals and Refractories","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Large regulatory claims can increase demand for liability, credit, and project-risk cover while also making insurers more cautious on underwriting mining-sector risks.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["ICICIGI","NIACL","GICRE"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Potential premium opportunity is offset by reassessment of mining-sector legal and environmental risk.","sector":"Insurance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"The dispute includes chrome leases; any precedent affecting chrome mining economics can ripple into ferrochrome availability, stainless steel input costs, and margins.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["JSL","SAIL","TATASTEEL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Direction depends on whether enforcement raises costs for captive chrome miners or tightens merchant chrome supply.","sector":"Ferroalloys and Stainless Steel Value Chain","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
24 Aug, 04:24 IST · Market event · high impact
India notifies the MMDR Amendment Act 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling unpaid pre-Act state levies - Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh threaten to move the Supreme Court
A new mining law stops state governments charging miners extra taxes on the land their mines sit on and wipes out the unpaid old bills, which saves money for miners like Coal India, NMDC, Tata Steel and SAIL - but the states say they will fight it in the Supreme Court.
Who it hits first
- Companies that own their own mines in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh no longer face open-ended state cess bills. Tata Steel, SAIL, NMDC, Coal India and Hindustan Copper had been staring at instalment payments that were due to start from April 2026, and the unpaid part of those bills is now wiped out.
- Manganese and copper miners with pits in Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan get the same certainty, but a smaller one, because those states never levied the aggressive cesses that the eastern states did.
Who may gain
- NMDC and Coal India, which sell ore and coal at administered prices and could not pass a state cess on to buyers, keep the money instead.
- Integrated steel makers that dig their own iron ore and coal - Tata Steel, SAIL, Jindal Steel - see the cost of self-mined ore stop drifting upward.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, aluminium smelters and thermal power stations that buy domestic ore and coal are the end users. Their input bills stop being exposed to a state deciding to add a new cess mid-contract, which makes long-term supply pricing easier to fix.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and mine-developer-operators get more predictable client budgets, because their customers no longer have to set aside cash for disputed state levies. Adani Enterprises, which runs mines for state generators, is the clearest example.
Where demand moves
Business
Nothing changes in how much ore or coal India buys. What changes is who keeps the cash: money that would have flowed from miners to state treasuries stays with the miners. Steel mills that buy ore in the open market may eventually see slightly cheaper ore because sellers no longer have to build a state cess into their price.
Capital
If the relief is believed, money rotates into the companies with the biggest cancelled bills - Tata Steel, SAIL, Coal India, NMDC. So far it has not: the group is flat to down over the eight sessions since the Bill passed, which says investors are waiting to see whether the states win in court before paying for it.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and contract-mining order books become easier to plan once miners are not holding cash back for disputed tax bills.
Metals & Mining
Contingent liabilities set aside for state mineral cesses can be written back, and the cash cost of self-mined ore stops rising.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India, which faced some of the largest state demands on coal-bearing land, keeps cash it had provided for.
Power
Thermal generators buying domestic coal get more predictable fuel costs, since coal suppliers no longer need to price in a possible state cess.
When it plays out
Immediate
Little share-price reaction is likely, because the Act was already notified on 17 August and the market has had eight sessions to react and did not. Watch for companies quantifying the write-back in their September-quarter results.
Medium term
If the Act survives, mining project economics improve permanently and captive-mine expansion becomes easier to underwrite. If it is struck down, the twelve-year instalment clock from the 2024 ruling restarts.
Short term
State governments file in the Supreme Court. Any interim order that stays the Act would hand the relief straight back and hit the same shares.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Lower legal/tax uncertainty for limestone and other mineral-bearing land reduces contingent cost risk for cement producers with captive mines; if states cannot add mineral levies, royalty-linked input inflation risk eases for clinker/cement capacity in mineral-rich states.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["ULTRACEMCO","SHREECEM","DALBHARAT"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most relevant for cement companies with captive limestone exposure or large eastern/central India operations.","sector":"Construction Materials","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cost certainty for iron ore, coal and aggregates can reduce pass-through risk in steel, cement and power inputs; lower perceived project-cost inflation supports EPC margins and road/rail/industrial capex execution.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LT","NCC","PNCINFRA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order effect depends on whether miners and metal producers pass cost relief through to customers.","sector":"Infrastructure \u0026 Construction","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If steel and cement cost pressures ease, construction input-cost volatility declines for developers; lower commodity-linked working-capital stress can support project margins and launch economics.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","GODREJPROP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Impact is indirect and likely smaller than demand, interest-rate and local approval drivers.","sector":"Realty","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Reduced tax overhang for domestic iron ore, manganese and steel producers improves steel cost visibility; auto OEMs and component makers benefit if flat/long steel price risk moderates.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"More visible for steel-intensive vehicles, forgings and components; pass-through contracts may dilute near-term benefit.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Components","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty in steel, copper and aluminium supply chains can stabilize input costs for appliances, cables and electrical goods; improved metal availability reduces procurement risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["VOLTAS","BLUESTARCO","DIXON"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Benefit is indirect and depends on commodity price transmission rather than the legal change itself.","sector":"Consumer Durables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cancellation of unpaid pre-Act levies lowers contingent liabilities and credit-risk tail events for leveraged miners, steel producers and power-linked borrowers; banks/NBFCs with commodity-sector exposure may see reduced provisioning risk.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Large diversified lenders see diluted impact; project financiers with metals, mining and power exposure are more relevant.","sector":"Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral extraction and dispatch plans become less constrained by tax uncertainty, rail, port and bulk logistics volumes for coal, iron ore, steel and allied minerals may improve; eastern corridor movement benefits most.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GESHIP"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Volume effect requires actual production/dispatch response, not just accounting relief.","sector":"Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mining-cost certainty for coal, limestone, rock phosphate and mineral inputs can marginally improve domestic raw-material availability and energy-cost visibility for fertilizer and industrial chemical producers.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["TATACHEM","GNFC","CHAMBLFERT"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Positive input-cost effect may be offset by administered pricing, subsidy timing and global commodity trends.","sector":"Chemicals \u0026 Fertilizers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states lose potential retrospective levy collections, which can pressure state capex, receivables discipline or subsidy payments; utilities and contractors exposed to Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh state entities could see mixed fiscal knock-ons.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["NTPC","POWERGRID","IRB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Not a pure NSE sector classification, but relevant as a cross-sector fiscal transmission channel.","sector":"State-Focused Public Finance / Utilities","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
14 Aug, 04:27 IST · Market event · high impact
Parliament passes the Mines and Minerals Amendment Bill 2026, barring states from taxing mineral rights and cancelling uncollected past mineral levies
Parliament has stopped state governments from charging their own taxes on mining, and cancelled old state demands that were never actually collected - a large windfall for miners and steel makers like Tata Steel, Coal India and NMDC, and a revenue loss for mineral-rich states such as Jharkhand and Odisha.
Who it hits first
- Parliament has passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill 2026, which stops state governments charging their own taxes and cesses on mineral rights and mineral-bearing land, and cancels past state demands that were never actually deposited or recovered. This directly reverses the effect of the Supreme Court's July and August 2024 rulings, which had let states tax minerals and recover those taxes going back to April 2005. Miners of iron ore, coal, manganese, limestone and copper - and integrated steel makers with their own captive mines - lose a large, open-ended liability from their accounts.
Who may gain
- Integrated steel makers with captive mines, above all Tata Steel, which had disclosed one of the largest provisions against retrospective state mineral demands.
- Iron-ore, coal and manganese miners - NMDC, Coal India, MOIL and Hindustan Copper - whose per-tonne cost becomes predictable again.
- Cement makers with captive limestone quarries, whose cess exposure is now capped by the Centre rather than open to state discretion.
Along the supply chain
Downstream
Steel mills, cement plants and power stations that buy these minerals get a more predictable delivered cost, because the risk of a state suddenly adding a cess to their input price is now removed. That improves the reliability of their own margin guidance rather than lowering their costs today.
Upstream
Mining contractors, explosives makers and equipment suppliers gain, because miners freed of a large contingent liability can restart or accelerate expansion projects. Solar Industries and mine-development contractors sit in this queue, though orders typically follow two to three quarters behind the cash release.
Where demand moves
Business
No physical supply is disrupted, so tonnage does not change hands. What changes is money: a contingent tax claim worth tens of thousands of crores across the industry is cancelled, so cash that miners had set aside stays with them. That cash tends to go into paying down debt and into expansion capital spending, which over the next few quarters means more orders for mining equipment, explosives, and mine-development contractors. In the opposite direction, mineral-rich state governments - Jharkhand, Odisha, Chhattisgarh - lose an expected revenue stream, which can slow their own infrastructure spending and hurt companies dependent on those state budgets.
Capital
Money should rotate into the metals and mining sector generally, and within it towards the companies that had actually provided for the retrospective demand - those get a direct, quantifiable write-back - rather than towards recyclers and traders that never had the liability. Some money may rotate out of state-government-dependent contractors and state-focused lenders in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.
How it spreads across sectors
Capital Goods
Mining equipment and explosives makers benefit as freed-up cash funds expansion.
Construction Materials
Cement makers with captive limestone lose an open-ended state cess risk.
Financial Services
Lenders concentrated in Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh face a modest negative as those state budgets lose an expected revenue line.
Metals & Mining
A large contingent liability is removed and future mining costs become predictable.
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Coal India's state cess exposure is capped, the single largest such exposure in the country.
Power
Thermal generators get more predictable delivered coal costs.
When it plays out
Immediate
Expect mining and metals stocks to open higher, with the biggest moves in the names that had actually disclosed provisions - Tata Steel, Coal India, NMDC. Note the historical precedent runs the other way and is noisy: on the two adverse Supreme Court dates in 2024 these same stocks closed higher the following day, because the bad news had already been absorbed on the ruling day itself.
Medium term
Over one to six months the durable effect is lower and more predictable mining costs, which supports Indian steel and cement margins. The offsetting risk is that mineral-rich states cut their own capital spending, which would hurt regional contractors and state-focused lenders.
Short term
Over one to four weeks, watch for companies to quantify the write-back in exchange filings - that is what turns a headline into an earnings number. Jharkhand and Odisha are likely to challenge the law or seek compensation, and any credible legal challenge would take some of the gain back.
Other sectors it reaches
- {"causal_chain":"Removal of contingent mineral-tax liabilities improves cash-flow visibility and credit metrics for mining, steel, cement and power borrowers; lower probability of stressed working-capital drawdowns or covenant breaches benefits lenders and financiers exposed to these sectors.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SBIN","ICICIBANK","PFC"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Benefit is indirect and strongest for lenders with commodity, infrastructure, PSU and project-finance exposure.","sector":"Banks \u0026 Financial Services","time_horizon":"1_to_4_weeks"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower tax uncertainty for coal, iron ore, limestone and metal producers can support mine dispatches, steel/cement production planning and bulk commodity movement; higher freight volumes benefit rail-linked logistics and port handlers.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["CONCOR","ADANIPORTS","GPPL"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Magnitude depends on whether producers convert liability relief into higher output rather than balance-sheet repair.","sector":"Railways \u0026 Logistics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Improved capex confidence in steel, metals and mining can lift demand for oxygen, nitrogen, argon, acetylene, electrodes and welding consumables used in smelting, fabrication and maintenance.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["LINDEINDIA","INOXINDIA","ADORWELD"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Second-order capex and utilization play; not an immediate earnings driver.","sector":"Industrial Gases \u0026 Welding Consumables","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Steel, cement and non-ferrous producers facing lower mineral-levy risk may run plants at steadier utilization and restart deferred maintenance/capacity programs, increasing demand for refractory bricks, monolithics and kiln/ladle linings.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["RHIM","IFGLEXPOR","VESUVIUS"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Most relevant if steel and cement producers expand output after cost visibility improves.","sector":"Refractories \u0026 Industrial Ceramics","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"If mineral-rich states lose expected retrospective levy revenues, their fiscal room for state-funded roads, irrigation and local infrastructure may tighten; however lower steel/cement cost risk can support project economics for contractors.","direction":"mixed","example_tickers":["IRB","PNCINFRA","ASHOKA"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Negative state-capex channel versus positive input-cost visibility channel.","sector":"Roads \u0026 Infrastructure Developers","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Cement and steel cost uncertainty eases as limestone, iron ore and coal levy risks are capped; this can improve margin visibility for developers and building-material users if input prices stabilize.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["DLF","LODHA","OBEROIRLTY"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Pass-through and demand conditions matter more than the tax change, so the link is defensible but diluted.","sector":"Real Estate \u0026 Building Products","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Lower uncertainty around steel, aluminium and copper supply costs can reduce input-cost volatility for vehicle makers and component suppliers, especially if metal producers pass through some benefit via prices or stable contracts.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["TATAMOTORS","M\u0026M","BHARATFORG"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Third-order effect; stronger for metal-intensive CV, tractor, forging and component chains.","sector":"Automobiles \u0026 Auto Ancillaries","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"Mineral-rich states facing weaker revenue expectations may slow payments, local schemes or contractor spending, potentially softening rural liquidity and credit demand in affected regions such as Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh.","direction":"negative","example_tickers":["CREDITACC","SPANDANA","UJJIVANSFB"],"magnitude":"small","notes":"Regional and fiscal-transmission risk; not a direct balance-sheet hit from the Bill.","sector":"State-Focused NBFCs \u0026 Microfinance","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
- {"causal_chain":"With retrospective levy overhang reduced, miners may have greater certainty to maintain or expand extraction plans, supporting demand for industrial explosives, blasting services, mine development and contract mining.","direction":"positive","example_tickers":["SOLARINDS","GOCLCORP","GMDCLTD"],"magnitude":"medium","notes":"Most sensitive to actual mine production growth and tender activity after policy clarity.","sector":"Explosives \u0026 Mining Services","time_horizon":"1_to_6_months"}
Dividends, splits & big trades
Money paid out, share splits and buybacks, and big buys or sells by funds and insiders.
Dividends
| 5 Oct 2026 | unspecified | ₹1 |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Feb 2026 | interim | ₹2.5 |
| 14 Aug 2025 | unspecified | ₹1 |
| 21 Mar 2025 | interim | ₹2.3 |
| 27 Dec 2024 | bonus | ₹0 |
| 17 Sep 2024 | unspecified | ₹1.5 |
| 27 Feb 2024 | interim | ₹5.75 |
| 31 Aug 2023 | unspecified | ₹2.85 |
Splits, bonuses & buybacks
- daily-prices repair: 9 rows from NSE's archive (replace 1, delete 1, insert 7), 2016-10-30..2026-02-01 (docs/flat_day_repair.md)1× · 30 Oct 2016
Documents
Annual reports, results presentations and earnings calls, straight from the source.
- Earnings call1 Jun 2026
- Annual report · 2024-256 Aug 2025
Facts from company filings and exchange data. Not investment advice: nothing here tells you to buy or sell.